[000:00:00;00] security aid, which is very important, we believe that the house should urgently accept the additional request that we have sent not only for the financing of security assistance to ukraine, not only for the financing of security assistance for israel, but also for the financing of humanitarian assistance that we requested for the people of gaza, in our view, this is extremely important, both for their safety and well-being, and for the long-term security interests of israel. mr. oleksandr, at this time, when matthew... talked about the need to restore additional funding for ukraine, israel and the gas sector, a humanitarian, regarding humanitarian issues, there was a ukrainian delegation in the united states of america, and it is still headed by the deputy prime minister of ukraine, yulia sveredenko, and andriy yermak is a member of this delegation.

andrii yermak made several statements regarding the fact that 2024 will be a turning point... a year for ukraine, well, today i am looking at the statements made by yermak that the issue of closing the sky over ukraine was discussed, i.e. providing additional pppo, because ukraine will to open one of the civil airports, and it will be necessary to solve this issue somehow, as you assess, such diplomacy as the ukrainians are currently demonstrating. the ukrainian delegation and how effective it is in the current situation, how convincing it is and whether yulia severdenko and andriy yarmak were from that category of people who conducted the negotiations, unfortunately, ukraine is a hostage of internal political processes in the united states, and there are a certain number of congressmen who want , so that ukraine withdraws from these aid projects, so that ukraine

is not financed. then they put forward different let's put it this way, the claims against ukraine are not talking about ukraine at all, but they are talking about the fact that the dollars of american taxpayers should be spent on their own american interests, and of course they will be convinced by any brilliant diplomat or politician, whether it is the head of the office, the president, vice prime minister cannot. but there is also a conscious part of republicans who say that we are ready to allocate money, but we need it. to understand what, that is, what is, as they call the theory of victory, and the second point, they say about control tools over the spending of these funds, because you know very well that ukraine does not have a very good reputation for corruption, of course, that we can , let's say, make arguments in our favor that the european union and

the european commission are watching and say that we must to launch the process of negotiations regarding ukraine's membership in the eu, looking at the success or success in reforms that the ukrainian authorities have demonstrated recently, and of course we have arguments, but in any case , let's stop it, corrupt state, it it remains, and our enemies also use it, with regard to the transparency of use, there are actually no problems here, since from the very beginning of the front transfer of weapons to us, mechanisms were already laid, that is, monitoring of this, and in the summer, i did not see the latest public figures, but in the summer there was information that about 4-40 reports of this inspector general of the pentagon had already been prepared and in none of them there were violations on the part of the ukrainian military, that the weapons went somewhere in the wrong place, another question, of course, is economic aid and other types of aid, there may be questions, but there are also tools for control over this, and actually

what ukrainian officials and politicians in washington can say, of course they can say about what we are planning, i.e. what actions we have from the point of view of military actions, ukraine's readiness to further defend itself and liberate its own territory , well, actually give at least some guidelines, although in fact, anyone who is currently in washington, he cannot and will not be able to clearly form which we can achieve since it depends a lot on not on ours. will, not from the fact that we have human resources who are ready, let's say so, to risk their own lives to protect their own state, but what resources can be given to us, in fact, first of all , the united states, and here is such a, you know, closed circle, we it is necessary to say our goals, well, we have clear strategic goals, the complete liberation of the territory of ukraine, but let's say, we cannot do this with those, albeit large resources, which were provided to us

starting last year, but not... sufficient for to cope with the largest country in the world, with the largest military power on the territory of the european continent, so of course, i think , there will be a moderate... the success, the success of our interlopers who are there, i think they will give certain arguments to the administration, which will use them to , to convince first of all the house of representatives, and i hope that the $14 million aid to israel has already been voted in the senate, during this week at least two resolutions on the continuation of the american government should be voted on, and i hope that next week, or in a week, they will get... hands on the aid package for ukraine, on the southern border with mexico, strengthening it and about taiwan, and i hope that the senate and speaker johnson will show their skill politically,

in order to provide aid to ukraine , i don't know in what amount, maybe it will be less than 60 billion dollars, but of course, it has to happen, and it's very good that he once said that - the united states should not allow russia to win in ukraine, that is, he personally interested in providing help, will he be able to find such forms of packaging those things that are needed by the extreme right wing of the republicans with actually ukrainian interests, we will see and see, i think in the next two weeks, and the chancellor of the federal republic of germany, olaf scholz, who assured of support of ukraine. let's hear what scholz said. i again want to assure ukraine of germany's incredible solidarity and our support. after the united states, we are the biggest supporter of ukraine. we have every

intention of continuing to help. the only thing that is not said scholz, mr. oleksandr, that they are ready to give much more to ukraine than they are giving, although, since the beginning of the great war, it is obviously not... more progress from european countries, except for great britain , is demonstrated by germany, because germany generally started with quite modest aid to ukraine, we are all waiting for the taurus missile, but scholz doesn't talk about it either, that is, according to you, in germany they realize that the lack of taauus and serious weapons in ukraine can end badly for the whole of europe, i think yes, they realize that if the ukrainian counteroffensive is not successful, and we already have to talk about the 20th campaign of the 24th year,

of course, that this campaign definitely cannot be called a dead end, as some of our enemies abroad claim, and of course , that is, such wording was definitely not used by general zaluzhny in his article. he just said that we need such means so that we have a qualitative advantage over our enemy and do not lead to a positional war, we can use this feminism in quality there is synonymous with a dead end, so of course the germans clearly understand this and it is absolutely possible to say that what we are observing, in what way the policy of berlin has changed since the very beginning of the large-scale: invasion, these are really tectonic changes, and germany is the country that which will say, perhaps less than we want, but to do more, they have already learned this lesson, for the russians, there are questions, fear of escalation on the part of the russian federation, and

perhaps from the point of view of how many of these systems are actually in service with germany, because you know, with the large-scale invasion, the germans found out that they have a bad business with the production of those weapons, ammunition, which are actually ready for use, and of course, like any country, they look after their own interests first , and then the interests of its allies and only then about partner countries, such as ukraine , but all the rhetoric that we hear from mr. scholz and indeed those actions, since germany has broken out into second place after the united states in terms of the amount of arms supplied to us and of other help, they say, that this awareness is definitely in berlin. thank you, mr. oleksandr, it was oleksandr khara, a diplomat. thank you for participating in the program. let me remind you that we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. during the current program, we

are conducting a survey, we are asking you about whether ukraine needs a single telethon. this, this poll continues on youtube, so far 600 participants have voted. and 10% said yes, 90% said no, let's see the results of a telephone survey, because during the program we also conduct surveys by telephone, so 90% believe that it is not necessary, the only telethon in ukraine, 10% that it is necessary, then we will have a big program, the second part, after the bbc news release, in we will be on the air the people's deputies of ukraine, yaroslav yurchyshyn, viktoriya syumar and kostyantyn bondarev, we will talk about the criminal case of farion, how she was fired from the lviv

polytechnic, about the single telethon, who receives money for the single telethon from the budget about the oligarchs and how zelensky doesn't fight them, or does he fight, in a word we'll talk about it all in 15 minutes, please wait , i was flying, flying, and a cough stopped me, a cough is a symptom of a respiratory disease, that's why we're doing inhalation lordegal - inhalation a cough remedy, a direct way to expel phlegm, there is a 15% discount on templegin at podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. attention, an incredible novelty from unpack tv: super warm and very comfortable boots alaska style. perfect fit, waterproof material and a feeling of warmth even in 30-degree frost. alaska style boots have a universal design and practical black color, so they will suit both men and women. sizes range from 36 to 46, so get

two pairs at once, for you and your husband. side zippers will ensure a perfect fit, even on the widest leg. ekofur insulation perfectly retains heat and wicks away moisture, and the top is made of waterproof and wear -resistant raincoat fabric and reinforced with eco-suede. alaska style boots can be worn both in wet weather and in very severe frosts. high-quality, light and warm boots alaska style will provide comfort and skillful wet autumn and frosty winter and in unpredictable spring. you will always be warm, comfortable and dry. universal design, basic black color and good price. only from 799 hryvnias. call attention, an incredible new product from rozpak tv: super warm and very comfortable alaska style boots. perfect fit, water-repellent material and a feeling of warmth even in 30-degree frost. alaska style boots have a universal design and practical black color, so it will suit both men and women. sizes range from 36 to 46, so get two pairs at once, for you and

your husband. furnace zippers will ensure a perfect fit, even on the widest leg. the insulation perfectly retains heat and wicks away moisture, and the top is made of waterproof and wear-resistant raincoat fabric and reinforced with eco-suede. alaska style boots can be worn both in wet weather and in very cold weather. high-quality, light and warm alaska style boots will provide comfort and skillful wet autumn and frosty winter and in an unpredictable spring. you will always be warm, comfortable and dry. universal design, basic black color and good price. only from 799 hryvnias. call see this week in the judicial control program with tatyana shustrova. the beginning of the assessment of judges for their suitability for positions. she came up with a scheme according to which not only they, but in fact the rest of the unscrupulous judges can avoid. before that, and who is trying to disrupt the qualifying assessment? this is for the entire duration

of my life of preservation, see thursday 16 november at 5:45 p.m. the judicial control program with tetyana shustrova on the espresso tv channel. every day, every hour, every minute we receive a large amount of information. the most anticipated event of the year, which is actually happening on the front. what are the losses of personnel and equipment on the battlefield, how does the international community evaluate our successes, and what is moscow lying about? from the stream of news coming from everywhere, we single out the most important ones. the world is closely watching whether there will be weapons for ukraine and what kind, and what the russian occupiers are whispering about behind the commanders' backs. news, summaries of the week - this is a review of only important events, important, reliable events, this is analytics, fact-checking, professional comments. about this and much more today at about important things in simple language available to all viewers. greetings,

iryna koval is in the studio, and these are the results of the week on the espresso tv channel. news, summaries of the week, every saturday at 21:00 on espresso. greetings, friends, this is the verdict program, my name is serhiy ordenko, we continue the live broadcast of the tv channel. the second part of our program begins, from now on weekdays the verdicts are issued in a two-hour format, we work from 8 p.m. to on the 22nd, we are talking about ukraine, about the world, about war, about victory , about what interests you, our dear tv viewers, today we will talk about the television empire of the office of the president of ukraine, about how the security service of ukraine got involved, well and about how the secretary of the national security and defense council wants to wall off telegram channels,

or rather, make them more orderly in terms of information submission, yaroslav yurchyshyn, people's deputy of ukraine, voice fraction, is a guest of ours today. mr. yaroslav, i am you congratulations and glad to see you on our air. good evening. kostyantyn bondarev, people's deputy of ukraine, homeland faction. mr. kostyantyn, i congratulate you and thank you for joining our broadcast. good evening. and we are waiting for the inclusion of victoria syumar, people's deputy of ukraine from european solidarity. throughout our program, friends, we conduct surveys. we are you. today we are asking about the following: should ukraine have a single telethon, we ask this question on youtube and there is a fairly simple yes-no option, or your answer, please write in in the comments, and for those who are watching us now on tv, there are phone lines that you can call. if you

think that ukraine needs a single telethon, call 0800-211-381, if not, 0800-21. 382 all calls to all these numbers are free, and with this short question, i hope we will start our conversation with our guests with short answers, we will start with mr. yaroslav, do you think ukraine needs a single telethon, if he had all national channels are included and there was a greater balance of positions, such a form as a single informing... society during military operations is quite acceptable. in its current form, it does not fulfill this function. thank you, we have been joined by viktoria syumar, people's deputy of ukraine from european solidarity. ms. victoria, i congratulate you, i am glad to see you on our air. we have just started a blitz survey on

whether ukraine needs a single telethon, because we are asking tv and youtube viewers about it. do you think it's too short? necessary. does ukraine have a single telethon or not? you know, i will say that ukraine does not need censorship, because censorship kills the truth, and censorship kills freedom of speech in general, and this is a huge challenge today. in our country, unfortunately , what was called a marathon actually became a tool of censorship, and today it actually destroys public trust in the state, and therefore it is a dangerous phenomenon. thank you, mr. kostyantyn, and in your opinion, is there a need for... a single marathon telethon in ukraine or not? you know, today, the whole world is democratic the world is actually at war with the world of dictatorship, and what is our advantage is that we are a freedom-loving and democratic and free

people, and therefore i believe that we do not need any framework, in the form of a telethon, we need a more transparent system of owners, and also, who exactly and what is said in the mass media, in order for there to be appropriate responsibility, here, in my opinion, we need to put things in order, and there is a certain issue with sometimes telegram channels, we need to work in this direction, but also, create a single communication such a direction. submissions we definitely need information and ideas with society. i believe that our society does not need a single telethon today, for sure. since we started with blisopytuvaniya, let's expand this topic, for the year 2024, 2 billion in the state budget

is laid for a single telethon, this year, how the money was distributed among the main participants. of this telethon, we will now show a graphic, and this is a graphic that was accordingly created on the basis of the data published by the state enterprise multimedia platform inomovlenya of ukraine from april 12 of this year, so the largest amount of uah 146 million was received by the limited liability company we ukraine for the production of 900 hours of product, that is uah 163,000 per hour. content, then the slm news company receives uah 112 million for the production of 780 hours of product, then studio 1.109 hryvnias for the production of 780 hours of product and the inter tv channel will receive

uah 97 million for the production of 780 hours of product, well, that is, we see, relatively speaking, there are three or four groups media, which will be financed from the budget, that is, there is a group kolomoiskyi, although kolomoiskyi sits in sizo and he seems to have transferred the management of corporate rights, but those presenters who worked in ukraine work there, and there is inter, which just yesterday became the property of firtash, firtash is sitting in austria, he is under threat of deportation to the united states america, his business works normally in the telethon, earns the game. and everything is fine, ms. victoria, since you have been involved in the media sphere for quite a long time and studied the media

sphere, how can you explain this structure and the structure of financing and the structure of ownership those who are now participating in a single telethon, because it gives answers, perhaps, to the main question, whether zelensky is creating a television empire around the president's office, and whether we are behind these crowds. ukraine and the inter tv channel, which can be owned by someone else, and this state financing of these tv channels, doesn't it turn them into the main media oligarch in the country, that is, the president's office as the main media oligarch in the country. you know, i'm afraid that according to this formulation, we are transforming ukraine there, not even in russia, not even in belarus, in general in the dprk, because objectively, you really showed a part. of those tv channels that today work in a single marathon, that received funds, what is the we ukraine channel , well, you already mentioned it, they are journalists

of the former channel ukraine of renat akhmetov, who wrote a lot about it, media experts, in fact, today, most probably cooperate with the office of the president of ukraine, since a shareholder was named who simply did not have the opportunity to be a shareholder, yes, that's why... it is necessary to establish a tv channel there, that is, in fact, the state, through the state budget, and the state budget is allocated by the government, the government got the we ukraine channel in this way, and here is this sign, it just clearly proves it, i don’t really understand what it is, slm, but i suspect that this is the group that makes the product for the state tv channels, but we still have one huge problem, which is present in the marathon, by the way, we bred a huge number of state tv channels, if... in previous years, generally in 14-19 years ago, we had one

the european approach that we should denationalize all media, they should not belong to the state, but we should have one, but powerful public broadcaster, then we now have, in addition to the public broadcaster, which is financed from the state budget, the tv channel rada, which is financed from the state budget, the freedom tv channel, which used to be the foreign language channel, but now it is actually a tv channel that speaks to the interior of the country, because there is no foreign language there today, english language does not exist there, products are produced there, for some reason also in russian language, it is not clear for whom at all, but he is also present in the telethon, and these are three channels in addition to myma ukraine, which are essentially controlled by the government today, and you correctly said about inter, now there is a lot of information, there are rumors that the drawing is actually negotiating with the government today, about its main businesses, which are focused there. obviously, in the oil and gas sector, there are regional gas companies and similar things that are subject to

partial nationalization there today, in exchange for the fact that inter will actually be controlled by the government as well, and information it's not a secret it is also present absolutely everywhere there on the same media detector and many other resources that monitor processes in the media sphere, that is, this is another channel, yes, it is already the fifth tv channel, which today... is actually controlled by the authorities, i am not talking about 1.1, their information policy , which has always been very close to, let's say, the team that is at the bank today, and it is obvious that funding from the state budget makes this editorial policy completely loyal to the government, because it directly depends on the government whether it receives 100 million hryvnias for production of its product, channel 1+1, that is, this is another tv in the field of power, we see that today, you know, tv channels are not concentrated in the marathon, they are actually concentrated in the hands

of the authorities, in fact, these are state tv channels, we have turned the country into a country of the unified state television, since other tv channels, ukrainian tv channels, independent tv channels, we simply unlocked, the authorities simply unlocked from digital broadcasting and thus concentrated in their hands, in fact, a monopoly on de facto state television, an extremely dangerous situation, absolutely not european and absolutely similar to the situation even in north korea, nor... about what i said, in russia there is at least some semblance of pluralism there, thank you, ms. victoria, and mr. yaroslav, i wanted to ask you about one of participants of this telethon, group 1.1, because it so happened that over the past six months or a year, in one way or another, people are tangential to 1.1 or the owner of a share

of 1,1 and 2 +2 viktor medvedchuk, who was extradited to russia, is suspected of state treason. one of those who was a 1.1 star, there, on what terms he made programs, it is not so important, but he was a 1.1 star , oleksandr dubinsky was charged with treason, treason, suspicion of treason, guests who were constantly there, nestor shufrych also received suspicion of treason, kulyk, the prosecutor who was treason, and a completely personal question arises, i.e. why does this tv channel , which is financed by people who fled... another way were involved in treason, still determines or participates in the determination of the state information policy in the state or not just for at least a while on the parliamentary level to ask the question, listen, well, what are we doing, we take the products in which state traitors were involved, and stuff them into one national telethon, into a big

patriotic telethon, what should it be? well, i want to remind you that until recently , nestor shufrych was the head of the committee on freedom of speech, and if, among the politicians you mentioned above, actually in the pool of the channel, 1.1 or inter, and also here in principle, do not take any product, with a single marathon, there are a lot of questions, why exactly, exactly, this product was ordered, why is this, we are fighting so hard for the fact that, in fact , open tenders, open competitions, and even military procurements, victoria and i work in the corruption committee, we initiated a bill so that non-armed procurements

of the ministry of defense, at least in fact informed about how the bidding took place, from whom the purchases were made, so to understand, in this case we really see that the resources that should go to the support of all the channels involved in the formation of a single marathon are distributed quite opaquely, not to mention the fact that the list of channels that join the single marathon is also, well, very strange, and, in addition to the public one, there are only representatives of oligarchic channels, so-called, we can talk about the fact that under pressure... fear of getting into the register of oligarchs, someone rewritten the property, someone, on the contrary , returned the public share in the media asset, as firtaz has now done, and therefore there are more questions than answers and it would seem that a sufficiently progressive law on the media was adopted, but

the personal composition, the national committee of telerio , i.e the commission of the regulator in the field, and again, a native of one, ms. gerasumiuk, heads it, and again questions arise, and who is the regulator, so frankly speaking, at the level, actually, i would perhaps partially agree with, actually, victoria about the fact that we have such a serious state monopoly on the media, but here i would more correctly say that it is probably the authorities, because we have a state broadcaster, public broadcasting. which, during the previous convocation, received a sufficiently serious independence and, thank god, preserved it, and if you look at the results of the study of the institute of mass information, this is the most balanced share in the single marathon , that is, is it possible to submit materials in a balanced way, yes, but if you do not depend on the authorities, that is why it is a big challenge, we