ah, so it will be such a one- goal game with a result that will be written in advance. well, the belarusian opposition, in some way or another, is preparing for this date, let's say, tykhanovskaya, or your coordination council, that you, of course, well , we are getting ready, but we understand that the fate of power in belarus will not be decided in these elections, on those, in general, it was not decided much, because no one counted the votes from lukashenko, yes, there are numbers known in advance, the fate of belarus is decided on the streets on the battlefield in the war, now. lukashenko is now leading some negotiations, you said that somehow it is necessary to come out of this story as a winner, lukashenko, because it is obvious that , being next to russia, there will definitely be no attention and gratitude from european partners, and this is an overlap of economic paths, directly, or where are

lukashenka's negotiations with certain leaders now, established, establishing ties? now this is not the case, there are signals from lukashenko of readiness for such negotiations, but i understand that we are the new coalition that came to power in poland, we, lithuania, latvia and estonia, which is a guest, well, how about our neighbors, they are not yet ready for any... any negotiations with lukashenko, well, the americans simply do not like him, and he is a nobody for them, that is, if they are big countries, like america, france , germany, they will talk to someone, they will talk to the russians, because they believe that lukashenko is just a puppet in the hands of putin. ugh. mr. andrii, finally, we recently mentioned the so-called statistics, sociology, which are conducted in russia on the support of the so-called special operation, which started by putin, there is data about it.

70% of people who support what is happening in ukraine, in belarus there are similar calculations, similar polls, and according to independent ones, this is the sociology that exists, well, official sociology does not ask about the war, well, so as not to be upset or does not ask publicly about everything in case, independent sociology says that support for the war in ukraine is less than 10% of the population. it may change a little there due to topics or events at the front, but in general it is overwhelmingly low percent, which did not allow lukashenko - to join this war in any way, or even - openly - to support putin - as if he would stand right next to him as an ally, and he still tries to pretend that he is against this war

and he does not directly support himself, but how about such a peacemaker and a man who is trying to build a bridge, ugh , mr. andriy, thank you, andriy kureychyk, a member of the coordinating council of the belarusian opposition, a researcher at yale university, was in direct contact with us , and the ones information marathon continues news, we continue to work for you live. chevorons, who are approaching victory, this year's winter promises to be difficult again, the enemy is targeting critical infrastructure facilities, so you have to prepare... for

the most difficult scenarios. keep the heat, insulate the houses, it will be difficult, but the fighting spirit cannot be borrowed from the ukrainians. think about an additional safe source of heat, everyone should be responsible this winter. invite your relatives who you know from the regions that have been destroyed, together it is warmer and more fun. the best way to warm up is to engage in light sports, because our energy is enough to overcome any cold. stock up on flashlights and. power banks, charge them and stock up on food, water and warm clothes. warm up deliciously, fragrant tea or a hot dish gives warmth from the inside, and calories are not superfluous in winter. make friends with your neighbors, it is easier to beat the enemy in a group, and even more so to winter. and most importantly, support the armed forces. thanks to them, we have the opportunity to meet this winter. and as long as we are united, we are not afraid of any enemies. it's cold, let's hold on to each other

one, let's beat the winter together. a warm country: ukrainian gives freedom. even the letters hide our determination and defiance. who else puts not just a dot over i, but two dots over i. ukrainian the language of the free. the 16 american fighter jets will probably be handed over to ukraine closer to spring. currently, pilots are studying at various bases in europe and the united states under the supervision of local instructors, and ukraine is also doing its homework at the same time, namely preparing for the acceptance and maintenance of new aircraft, and what and how ukraine should prepare, he will tell then anna brykova. while waiting for the f16, the first ones

may appear in ukraine as early as next year, their number will gradually increase, however , the exact number of aircraft has not yet been named, yakit. i do not have any specific information about when the first f-16 will take to the skies of ukraine. i know that pilot training continues. in particular, in denmark, where a group of pilots has already started training flights with instructors in the usa and great britain. currently , a training center is being built in romania, which will later train pilots from both ato countries and ukrainian the netherlands has already transferred the first five fighters there. the rest of the engineering staff is also trained in other countries within the aviation coalition, because it is a whole complex. one plane will serve several brigades. weapons brigade, specialists, specialists of radio equipment, communication equipment, guidance systems, navigation, and the aircraft technician himself, he is responsible for all procedures related to the airframe itself,

the fuselage, refueling with appropriate fluids, refueling, and tracking all problems , what a review. which should do every time by engine. and while everyone is studying, ukraine is doing its homework to adopt the f-16. improving the quality of runways, those that are available, there are others, well, we have many operational ones. next, what we need is, of course , shelters, shelters for airplanes , both reinforced concrete and temporary, and maybe even underground, here we are talking about preserving the equipment that our partner gives us. you will have to take care not only of the planes themselves. this is the protection of all radio equipment, including radar stations, stations short-range drive, long-range drive, well, everything that provides it, take-off and landing.

moreover, the planes will not be stationed all in one place, just as ukraine is currently protecting its existing combat aircraft. the air force assures that there are opportunities for the adoption of american iron birds, and in ukraine these are by the way. will also not be the first time, in 2018 in starokostyantinov, it was a clear sky training, where f planes, 15c eagle, this is a larger plane, with two two-wingers, f16 were also landed in the 12th year, in the 11th, 12th , in myrhorod on training ground, at the myrhorod airfield, there was also training , provision, holding of euro 2012 there, and ukrainian airfields calmly accepted them... despite the difference in runways, ukrainian runways are tiled, and american ones are mostly smooth, however, for the full-fledged operation of american fighters, it is worth also agree on equipment for take-off and landing and navigation, and it will also be necessary to equip our command posts with communication systems compatible with american

communication systems, i am talking about ling 16, first of all, this is a system that ensures the reception large volumes of information, on board the aircraft and , accordingly, the transfer of these volumes of information. in the future, the air force is counting on its own training center, because it is necessary to train and improve the qualifications of specialists. however, when exactly this will be put into practice is still unknown, while experts are skeptical about such an idea. well, it is possible to create ukrainian educational centers, but on polish territory. we have already had as many strikes on our training grounds where we were preparing, so no, no. in my opinion, it will be possible either prepare small groups, however, time will tell, experts say, the main thing is for the fighters to appear in the ukrainian skies as soon as possible, because they will significantly strengthen both air defense and be able to gain an advantage in the sky, and this can save a large number

of lives. anna brykova we are ukraine, single news marathon. the us senate passed a temporary project on additional funding to avoid a shutdown, it was supported. senators, and before that the document was approved by the house of representatives and now it will be sent to president joe biden for signature. i would like to remind you that the project will continue funding the work of the government until the beginning of mid-january. february, until january 19, funding will be allocated for priority sectors, until february 2 , the remaining functions of the government will be funded. well , it is important for russians to create the impression that the whole world has left ukraine, said mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the head of the president's office. according to him, the aggressor needs the illusion of the unimportance of our country, because now there is a conflict in the middle east and all attention will allegedly be directed there. but european countries. declare their support for ukraine. in the united states, there are even heated discussions about providing aid to our

state. together with our , let's say, military enterprises, they are developing plans for investments in military production, either on the territory of ukraine, or it doesn't matter which territories, and today they are prioritizing what we need. today, ukraine is the top topic, be that as it may, for but, despite all these discussions, why would the united states in any case help ukraine to the extent that it is about today it is said, there are 61 billion or more even and so on and so on. why? i explain, because again, this is not an investment in ukraine, this is an investment in the global leadership of the united states. they want to prove that they should sit at the table with china and work out a new format of the global security framework, for that they need to confirm their leadership. the united states has no questions regarding military aid for ukraine, the ambassador

of ukraine to the united states, oksana markarova, said. according to her , the main discussions among the american the authorities are concerned with the budgetary and humanitarian components. the position of ukraine and our friends needs all the help, and we need it as early as yesterday, that is, as soon as possible. it could be as soon as congress gets back to work, after thanksgiving. november december the embassy of ukraine in the united states and the entire ukrainian team, all delegations from ukraine and all video phone contacts are actively working to communicate the urgency of aid and the importance of all its components. oksana markarova, ambassador of ukraine to the usa. today the world is experiencing a turning point, and decisions made now will set the course for generations to come. us president joe biden wrote about this in his column for the washington post. according to him, vladimir putin and the terrorist hamas are pursuing the same goal in the war - to erase the neighboring

democracy from the map. both putin and hamas hope to undermine broader regional stability and integration and take advantage of the ensuing turmoil. america cannot and will not allow this to happen, for our own national security interests and for the good of all the world the obligations of the states to ukraine today are investments in american security. candles from us is the solution to the problems of our time. joe biden, president of the united states of america. dmytro abramson, blogger, us political commentator, is now in direct contact with us. mr. dmytro, good morning, it's already morning, yes. good night, glad to see you, as always, glad to join you. mr. dmitry, you see how many topics have accumulated, literally in the last day or two, political life is very active in the united states, very a lot has happened, and a good one.

the news is that ukraine is on the budget agenda, yes, as a participant, as it were, in this budget political debate, this is good, but the bad thing is that we still understand that biden did sign this temporary budget, and this will mean that is postponed, well actually for several months, and we have hopes, maybe for a week, maybe after the day of the pojaka there will be some change, eh. you know, it is very difficult to predict how it will end, i can tell how the situation would have changed in the last a couple of weeks, i was with you on your channel a couple of weeks ago, when we didn’t have a speaker yet, when the republicans couldn’t elect anyone, that is, there was no speaker yet, the congress did not function at all, they finally elected mike johnson , who, unfortunately, is from that wing of the republican party that resisted any allocation of any money for ukraine, so he was finally elected speaker, a speaker like

me already told, it depends very much, he in almost all cases there are maneuvers, but they are very complicated, but he can block, in general, the introduction of a bill for discussion, and even if the bill theoretically has enough support for it to be accepted, accepted in the chambers in the representative's chamber, he simply can to block, different committees to which he appoints his people may also try to do so, so the situation did not look very good, however, so far he is showing himself more as a speaker, that is, he entered, as it were, in a different role than when he was just like... a congressman and voted against some bills to finance the american budget or money for ukraine, that is, we observe that he seems to have stepped into the role of speaker and tried to come to an agreement with different factions of the republican party, about , how to extend the american budget, and after he listened to everyone, he finally came to the conclusion

that even within the republican party, they just can't come to an agreement, let alone come to an agreement with the democrats, and will come to an agreement with the senate, which is dominated by democrats, and will come to an agreement with the white house, which can, in principle, impose a veto and not sign the law. and then he practically did the same thing as his predecessor, kevin makati, he said, let's just extend the existing budget. but i will remind you that the previous time , when this happened on september 30, the budget was extended for ukrainian money, it was not included there, it was a kind of ultimatum of the house of representatives, and the senate had to agree to it, despite the fact that in their version 60 billion dollars were allocated for ukraine at that time, and now something similar happened again, he simply extended the existing budget, as you correctly said, part until january 19, part until february 2, how will this issue be resolved further, it is not clear if someone then he can predict it for you, don't believe it, because the house of representatives itself does not know how

they will do it, they can try to tie , tie ukraine's money to money for israel, for taiwan, for the southern border, as he suggested, they can try to vote separately, they can block it or include it already on january 19 in one of the future american budgets, but what exactly will happen, i unfortunately cannot predict. and what do you think, mr. dmytro, why, well, why is there no such certainty, in fact, this is not the topic of the week or the month of aid to ukraine, right? that is, it seems that an agreement has already been reached there. a certain amount of money is determined and so on, that is, it depends on certain ideological differences, or is there something else, something that is connected precisely with the internal economic policy of the united states states? again, i believe that ukraine had strong bipartisan support until the actual leader of the republicans, donald

trump, began to speak out against it, and then part of the republicans agreed. voters in the congress, mainly in the house of representatives, began to speak out against it, and the balance of forces turned out to be such that they were able to block this assistance, that is, the last budget for ukraine was actually allocated in december last year, when the democrats still controlled the house of representatives, so there are already elections they lost, the next control was passed to the republicans, but it was supposed to happen on january 3, they managed to allocate 40 or so billion dollars for ukraine, which they calculated should have been enough for the summer or until the summer or even for the whole year. since then, they have not been able to allocate any budgets, so to speak, any budgets for ukraine, there were 300 million dollars that speaker makarty managed to put to the vote, a fairly modest amount, compared to the billions we

are talking about, these are 300 million, indeed for they voted, all the democrats and less than half of the republicans in the house voted, this is what he managed to do, and now there are enough people who resist if, if johnson put money for ukraine on a general vote, i i guarantee that 3/4 of the house of representatives would vote for this package, it would be almost all democrats, democrats have never voted against it, and it would be about half of the republicans who really want to support it. ukraine, but they can't because of this the second half, which blocks all of this, and how do they explain it, you know, there are very, very strange arguments, because ukraine is at war with our geopolitical enemy, due to relatively small amounts, which, by the way, are spent mainly in america, then these are jobs in america, weapons are produced in america, we are, as it were, with the help

of ukraine, let's be honest, despite the fact that your army is fighting. we are destroying the russian army, and the arguments why they do not want to help further cannot stand any critics, i can't give you a rational explanation other than that this is a political game that former president trump started. by the way, donald trump may become the biggest danger to the world next year, writes the british publication in its annual forecast for the next year. the article notes that the fate of the world will depend on the votes of the american people, because if trump wins the election, it will have a great impact on the united states and the situation abroad, it is also possible that the politician will be ready to conclude an agreement with the president of china regarding taiwan. donald trump is also most likely to unconditionally support israel and may destroy nato by abandoning the us commitment to treat

an attack on one country as an attack on all. the article also notes that trump's policy is likely to be sharply at odds with the vector of europe, so putin will have an incentive to continue the war against ukraine, as well as to take the former countries into his hands. ssr, about this greatest danger to the world, this is an exaggeration or not, mr. dmitry, what is meant, you they joke that economist commentators have forgotten putin's last name, calling trump the biggest threat. you know, i believe that trump's threat to america and the whole world is not exaggerated, in fact it is underestimated, and often when i say this, people think that i am exaggerating, but. in fact, it is impossible to congratulate here, you should listen to what, firstly, see what he did in the previous four, in the hour and 4th year, when he was in power, and secondly, what he said now after thank god,

the authorities separated him from the authorities through and through democratic elections, and it is very difficult to exaggerate the threat that he poses, in our various respected publications, information has appeared about how he plans, how we will joke, how we will... to everyone who is ego, ego, yes say, spoke against him when he returns to power, how he will use the ministry of justice for his own selfish political purposes against people who, as he believes, betrayed him, among whom, by the way, there are a lot of people who worked for him administration, i will repeat once again, the people who worked in his administration themselves say that under no circumstances should he be allowed to come to power, the people whom he himself appointed, the people who... know him very well in the post of president, they openly speak about the that he cannot in any case be allowed to come to power, and he is already planning how he will deal with them

when he, well, he thinks, when he wins the elections of the twenty-fourth year, and as for international politics, as i have already said, he always flirted with putin, that's it a long, long conversation, a long story, and this may be one of the reasons why he now stands against the support of ukraine, and the same... about nato, he openly spoke and says that he wants, well , to leave nato or they will threaten, at least they will threaten the nato countries, that america will not protect them, and this list can be continued, i am sure with taiwan and china. mr. dmytro, you know, there was a moment when volodymyr zelenskyi, the president of ukraine, publicly said in one of his addresses, if in we have some questions, or donald trump has them, he could come to ukraine, this. there was no official invitation, but donald trump reacted to it, it happened literally a week or two ago, he says that if i go to ukraine to talk to volodymyr zelenskyi, it will be a conflict of interest, because volodymyr zelenskyi

is talking to the president of our country, joseph biden, and here is to explain exactly, this is impossible, because any american citizen can come by land, and i think he will be shown everything he needs, that's why donald trump is using such rhetoric. he has no prohibition to come to ukraine naturally, the only thing is that he cannot conduct official american policy on behalf of america, because he is a private person, he speaks publicly, so he, you know, at least change what he says publicly, even times, to explain everything that donald trump says, that it is very difficult in his head without a medical diploma, because because i am not making it up, because we had psychiatrists, psychologists, workers of this profession who are forbidden to diagnose

patients at a distance, especially if they are not their patients , but they wrote open letters that mrs. trump has a narcissistic personality disorder, and i don’t know how to say it correctly, in russian, but that he is a sociopath, that is, he does not experience empathy, and he is primarily concerned about his ego, as it were, and therefore... it is possible to look at it in this way, but why did he say this, if, again, they observe everything that he says, very often he says what in this the moment comes to his mind, but it is obvious that he does not want to go to ukraine, because he is already predisposed against supporting ukraine and does not even want to find himself in a situation where he will be asked to be influenced in this sense, such appeals coming from trump are already his own, well, to some extent pre-election slogans, and the fact that

what he's going to do next and what he's going to appeal to his voters, these ideas, as far as they are now, popular with voters, and really how they 're responding to trump wanting to close, cancel nato, what he's saying, that the united states will not support either the country, if he becomes the president and there is any conflict in the world, well, that should cause some reactions? you know, unfortunately, we have a very polarized society , and most people look at the american presidential election, in general, the american one... they have everything in black and white, and if people have registered themselves, let's say in the republican party, although there is an exception, but if people let's say they wrote themselves down as saying that they support trump, i observed that it would be useless to talk with them further about any issues, because in the end everything it boils down to the fact that they will still support trump, no matter what he says and no matter what policy he proposes, there are some key issues that

concern them, in the rest... they will simply adapt to as i say, dear leader, i believe that this is approximately what happened in ukraine, as long as there was bipartisan support, and everything became clear when trump began to say that he was really against additional aid to ukraine, he gives some sufficient primitive arguments, and those are people who are egos and so they supported, they simply changed their opinion, they did not go into details, he is right, he is wrong, you need to support ukraine, you don't. they just changed their own, their own, their opinion to fit their, well, as we say tribe, yes, that is , to fit their group of people who support trump, and so if, if, if the people who support trump, they support in any case, even if he wants to leave nato, even if he wants to stop helping ukraine, although it is obvious that in the american interests, they will help better, on the other hand, there are people who perfectly understand

that from themselves... trump will vote against him in any case, again independently, that is, he did not add anything new here, we understand anyway , that he cannot be allowed to power, unfortunately, joe biden is also not popular, so you can look at the public opinion poll, unfortunately, trump, first of all, this is a big problem, that trump, in principle, has a chance to become president, in in any case, that he does not lose there with gap of 30%. second, yes, joe biden is unpopular, unfortunately. often associated with age, but not only, but we do not have a second candidate now, at the moment, this is the only person who can really win, because we simply have a two-party system and it clearly looks like biden should receive the nomination, if he only doesn't refuse, well, that's why this is the situation, mr. dmytro, one last thing, we literally have one and a half or two minutes left, an article in the washington post, well this

maybe it's not an article, it's a column, yes, by the president of the united states, joseph biden, where he spoke about the turning point in the world, he mentioned ukraine, he mentioned putin and mainly focused on the hamas terrorists, he laid out his vision of the political future, and by the way, the same the washington post, already later, made another publication about the fact that there are preliminary agreements on a truce between hamas and israel, and the united states participates there. here you are, if you read this column, literally your impressions, you know, i didn't read it, i just don't remember whether i finished it or not, but i can say in general that, well, i imagined what he wrote there, and i can say in general that biden is really trying now turn to american people, to american citizens, and call on them to support both israel and ukraine and

oppose putin, and this is... very good, because one of the problems with president biden was that he he may not have done it often enough, that is, he pursued the right policy, but he didn't always effectively or even did not ask sometimes to explain why he does and what he does, that is why the recent appeal to the american people, a column in the newspaper, this is all he is trying to somehow compensate and explain to the voters, why he is somehow calling them to support his policy, that is why it it is important, in this column, if i remember correctly, he connected that hamas, russia, iran, north korea, i don't remember, maybe even china, that these are somehow all our opponents, at least, and well, enemies, and we, we, as a democracy, we must help other democracies in this by the way, ukraine and israel, and this is our, as it were,

america's role in the world. we should not refuse it, so.