[000:00:00;00] i would focus on the second question, well, we will move on to it now, but if you are answering as a military man, what do your colleagues say, with whom you communicate, are they talking about demobilization, because we started with this, well, in ideals, i'll tell you what we're talking about, you know, sometimes, when we have free time, listen, it would be great if you fought, you know until what date, and then you were released for a certain period, for six months, not three weeks? to the landfill, or not even for a month to the landfill, for six months, but home, and then i am ready to return and continue to fight, this is exactly what i am conveying to you verbatim from my conversation with my brothers, it is important, it is important to hear this, and solomiya also said about this that, well, you need to understand the extent to which a military man will go to war, solomia, the actual question of mobilization, what mr. oleksandr said, what do you think, how much public opposition is possible there,

let's call it that, if for example the initiative, which the people's deputies are also talking about and which was voiced, if i'm not mistaken, ms. bezugla, also the members of your committee, that perhaps the postponements will deprive those people who are getting a second or third higher education, as far as this will not contradict the constitution, as far as these conversations are really now being held in the parliamentary committee, in the council itself, and will this not cause some internal resistance, because for the constitution no one does not have the right to conditionally deprive citizens there of the opportunity to obtain an education, and no one takes away their right to an education in the first place . the fourth education, as it turned out, and they go, for example, vocational and technical studies, being, for example, already with a higher education or more than one higher education, obviously everything becomes a logical question, friends, we understand that our nation is educated with a number of diplomas, which exceeds the standards there per square meter, but in two years it showed a clear trend, moreover, the word work seems to me to have made good analytics, how many people were added in the last

20 months. in education and began to acquire candidate status, postgraduate or higher education or ptu, having previously already diplomas, and here we are not talking about 18-year-olds, 20-year-olds, 25-year-olds, we are talking about another category of citizens who already have an education and for whom, let's be honest, obtaining an education became just another opportunity and to avoid mobilization , once again i am here with sashko in complete solidarity, well, it is not fair, it is not in relation to others, in fact, it is unfair in relation to others, and the booking, which is sometimes very often not filtered, who is booked, who, who is given postponements, who, who are hidden, and this huge number, the male population, especially in cities, in regional centers, i don’t know, in gyms, maybe it affects only a part of society, but it is an indicator that we have a fairly strong resource, and for those who will go out for sowing in the spring in the villages,

i have a question , who will do it, it seems to me, given the fact that everyone is in institutes or sports, it will probably be done by older women. ms. solomi, i will ask a very simple question, as any of the audience would probably ask, that is, all those, well, or part of those conditional gaps that are given today the possibility of avoiding mobilization, such as reservations, such as the third, fourth education of people who are 35 plus, specifically of male age, the council will still work in this context, some vision of how to make it so that this is no longer in the legislation, and then the only law about which mr. rahamia spoke yesterday, in particular, of the ten that we have in the parliament, the discussion around, will they foresee all these gaps in order to remove them from the legislation? look, there will be no gap, then, we are talking about reservation, because it is the cabinet's responsibility government, but really this is a huge number of changes to a number of laws, such a talmud of these changes , which i hope

we will register in the coming weeks, and there we are talking not only about the postponement of the right to demobilization, i want to emphasize that there will be another important clause for those who are released from captivity with the right to discharge from military service is something that we have been pushing for a very long time, more than a year and is actually a very valuable, for me also painful, vindictiveness that has been ripe for girls and boys who after captured and are not ready to continue their service, but they will changes, in particular, for example, for the tsk and they should be helped by local self-government bodies and state authorities, which have their own... to ensure the appearance of these future fighters to the tsk so that we don't see these thefts on the street, here i have to clarify how this will happen, summonses will be delivered to workplaces, summonses will be brought home even more actively there, because now , it is not about the form of summons delivery, it is about the fact that in addition to the tsc, this will be handled by local government bodies, that is, the executive committee, services

relevant, social services, a state authority, namely, for example, it is the regional military administration, or the district administration, which should ensure the transmission of these summonses, and not only the tsc, which catches people, we are currently still in discussions about the role of the national police before those people who don't want to go to tsk, because tsk can be passed simply by checking their souls... still no one takes them away, let's start with the fact that this is one of the stages, but in order to change this form and approach in the military, and help the military stop simply looking extremely shameful in the eyes, states, in particular, other authorities should be included, i thank you very much for enabling, unfortunately, the airtime is not so extended, we cannot talk more about or topic, but one important thing, mr. oleksandr, thank you for being turn on, take care of yourself, i remind you that we talked about the need to draft a joint draft law ukrainian parliamentarians, currently there are about 10 draft bills from different factions, from different groups, and they will draft one actually. oleksandr yapchenko , soldier of the zsu, solomiya bobrovska people's deputy of ukraine, members of the security, defense and intelligence committee of ukraine, guests

of our broadcast. the ukrainian air defense is getting stronger literally every month. this is how ramshtay summarized the results of the meeting of defense ministers of ukraine's partner countries. president zelenskyi. as a result of the meeting, a new coalition of ground-based air defense was formed. leaders in air defense assistance are germany and france. in total, 20 countries joined the coalition. this was reported by the minister of defense of ukraine, rustem umeru. in addition, the netherlands have prepared 2 billion euros for military aid to ukraine, and estonia will provide half a million dollars worth of funding for it coalition activities. great britain and norway will look for ways to strengthen security in the black sea, umira announced. for the first time, by the way. once, the commander-in-chief of the zsu valery zaluzhny took part in the ramstein meeting. in a telegram, he wrote that he informed his partners in detail about the situation on the battlefield, noted that the situation at the front is complicated, but under control.

meanwhile, the g20 summit in online format under russian president putin appeared and spoke in india's presidency, and in his speech he called to think about how to, quote, stop the tragedy of the war in ukraine. at the same time, putin used the word "war" instead of the kremlin's term "special military operation" and assured that russia has never refused, never refused peace talks with ukraine, and the leaders of the united states and china missed this meeting this time, why the question, because the g20 summit was taking place , our european correspondent, zoryana stepanenko, will tell, she already is contact us. zoryan, hello and word to you. good morning, colleagues, vladimir putin personally joined the leaders' meeting for the first time since the beginning of russia's full-scale war in ukraine, which also launched the biggest confrontation between the russian federation and the west since the cold war. the heads of the leading states of the european continent, which belong to the prestigious 20,

also had a video call with the russian president for the first time. speaking, he drew attention to the words of his colleagues, who said that they were struck by the war that is still going on in to ukraine, replied that hostilities are a quote-unquote tragedy and said that it is necessary to think about how to stop it, and also reminded that russia, they say, has never refused negotiations with ukraine, here i will note that western leaders regularly note that they they do not see any signs of vladimir putin's readiness to end the war and settle the situation, in general. this is not russia, but ukraine. this is not russia, ukraine has publicly announced that it is withdrawing from the negotiation process, and what's more, it was signed. edict, decree the head of state, who forbids such negotiations, understand that this is a war, the loss of life cannot but be impressive, the bloody coup

in ukraine in 2014, is it not impressive? this fragment of the speech of the russian president was published by the russian state television, on the screen, as you saw, the prime minister of india, which currently chairs the g20, as well as the delegates of indonesia, korea, as well as the invited representatives of singapore, bangladesh, and they did not react to what they heard with any emotions. well , at least visually it was not noticeable, about his video dialogue with the russian the president, this dialogue was later told by the german chancellor, who literally days ago did not rule out the possibility of a conversation between them, while noting that it makes sense if vladimir putin is ready to move on, and while saying this, olaf scholz called on the president of the russian federation to withdraw russian troops from ukraine, emphasizing, once again, that he does not see signs of readiness for this. as you know, today. for the first time since the beginning of the aggressive war against ukraine, the russian president took part in a video call of the heads of state and government of the 20. i called on president putin to stop the attack on ukraine and withdraw the troops from the territory

of ukraine so that this war will finally end. at the summit, where the results of the indian presidency in the 20s were summed up, the situation in the world economy was also analyzed, and not only were they not present, indeed, as you noted olezhe, the president of the united states, as well as the leader of china, joe biden, as noted in his. in the press office combined preparations for his birthday and thanksgiving, but the reasons why xijin pin missed this event were not reported. colleagues thank you very much, zoryana stepanenko, radio's european correspondent. svoboda about the results of the actual g20 meeting, where russian president putin spoke online for the first time. the european union has prepared a draft of security guarantees for ukraine, bloomberg writes about this with reference to a document received for study. this is still a guarantee project, bloomberg notes, among the proposals of brussels, a long-term mechanism for the provision of military equipment to ukraine, training of the armed forces of ukraine and strengthening of cooperation with the ukrainian defense industry. the plan also talks about sharing intelligence and

satellite images, on supporting demining efforts and on improving ukraine's ability to resist cyber threats and disinformation. instead, ukraine undertakes to continue a number of reforms, including in the law enforcement, judicial, security and defense spheres. at the same time, bloomberg writes with reference to an unnamed eu diplomat, the european union's plan to allocate 20 billion euros for arms for kyiv over four years is under threat, after all. some states, in particular germany, could not agree on the terms of their allocation funds instead, eu member states hope to agree at least on the allocation of 5 billion euros next year. this plan should be considered next week by the ambassadors of the european union states, and in december it should be discussed at the level of the country's leaders. what kind of security guarantees are these, and how effective they will be in general, we will try to find out together with our guest, maria mezyntseva, deputy head of the committee on the integration of ukraine with the european union. to the council of ukraine

of the ninth convocation, our guest, i congratulate you, i sincerely congratulate, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, thank you for joining, well, actually , we have gone through the points that plumberg writes about , and there, an expected effective, stable, long-term mechanism for the provision of military equipment to ukraine, which mobilizes or should mobilize the european defense industry , this is actually one of the main points, long-lasting and long-term, it is to what extent, what are the needs of the european union now and what opportunities does the european union have, how can you explain to us, well, taking into account the financial plans that approved for herself refi, recently, in the framework of the budget process, gives us and our partners only one signal, it is a signal that we also need to prepare very seriously and give in order to give a decent

fight back, that means, everything from ppp systems . and by the way, the partners are already talking about this very clearly, not like it was last season, protecting and allocating very, significant finances for our critical infrastructure, a lot of people, i think, were able to compare their photos on social networks literally a year ago, when there is a power outage and it is damaged infrastructure already had... place, that is, at the end of november last year, now, thank god, russia does not carry out such massive attacks, and the infrastructure of ukraine is much more protected, precisely thanks to the building that you see on the screen, this is the european commission, which allocated enough funding, what about military aid, here you know, our defense forces are expanding, new batteries are being created, and in the defense forces, in the resistance forces, which need not only

training, for which the european union allocated 45 million, this is the first time in history of existence project, as well as direct military aid, and by the way, the very formulation that there is an effort to create a unified aid package for several years within the framework of 20 billion euros is already a winning strategy, that is, separately. from the ramstein meetings, separately from our american partners, who are considering the figure of $61.7 billion, there are actually a lot of numbers, a lot of numbers, but i want to understand very simply, what do you think are the chances that these guarantees, when they are approved there already in the final result, they will be fulfilled, and it will not work for for example, as now, when the european union cannot fulfill its plan to deliver a million artillery shells to ukraine by march 24 due to the state of defense production and various bureaucratic

processes there, although this was also announced, and it was actually hoped for this and kyiv itself, well, you know that at the last ramstein and within the framework of all security conferences, for example, as its annual conference in canada, in the city of halifax on security and defense of the world, we raise these issues, really the world was not is not ready for the beginning of the 22nd year, nor can it now cope with such volumes of needs, for example, 155 millimeter shells of the nato format, since ukraine uses , including... the 152nd format, it is soviet, we are moving for the latest weapons, that is why i am affiliated with the latest modern standards, there is also a question of domestic, domestic capacity, domestic production and security, i will not go into details here, but there are agreements with partners, as you

already know, on the repair of their weapons on the territory of ukraine and on our own production, we have certain safeguards for this. guarantees for partners, and people, engineers, workers, potential new jobs, there are cities that are ready to localize it for the fastest production, and i will add, recently the minister of defense of germany was on an official visit to kyiv, you saw artillery shells in a package there too , systems, and not only, our defense forces. they hold the front firmly, this includes avdiyivka, kupyansk , bakhmut, and the melitopol direction, so for us it is an existential issue, i think,

you know, my own feeling, after communication with the generals of different countries of the world, in canada, that our partners finally understood that the phrase is not to help ukraine as much as it is necessary, but to help ukraine... so that we can win faster, this is a different philosophy, this is another approach, and still article five of nato, although we are not yet a nato country, but we are sure to be the 33rd after sweden joins, we are technically absolutely ready for this, this is a political decision, we are counting on the summit in washington, and here is an important point, article five, which has never been used yet, well, almost never, colleagues from nato, it... is used in fact by providing us with exactly this ammunition , i.e. not by supplying people, but by supplying weapons , at the end of our conversation, it is probably also just for understanding, this is an important moment when these guarantees will be accepted, to what extent, countries

, who will be the signatories of these guarantees undertake to fulfill them one hundred percent , are there possible risks in the context of the fulfillment of these guarantees, well conditionally, the military and defense industry of any of the countries on which they will rely will have certain problems, therefore these guarantees will not be fulfilled, or there will be problems for the european union with funding, therefore these guarantees will be fulfilled, i.e. how one hundred percent do the countries commit to ukraine to fulfill these guarantees based on the results of when they are accepted, the word guarantees, the word memorandum has various components of international law, the main thing is that this is not a memorandum, and this is not a memorandum, the president... he was the first to initiate these security guarantees and contractual relations with various countries of the world, there are already more than 35 of them, that is, it even exceeds the number of nato partner countries, so does each country, well, someone can provide the leopard-1 tank, leopard-2,

someone simply does not have it, for example, partners from canada, they do not have their own pppo production, but they were happy to finance . one of the systems through the united states of america for its production, therefore, both here at ramstein and in the direct communications of the ministry of defense and our commander-in-chief, the supreme commander-in-chief, there are very specific, as president zelenskyi said, i know about everything you have, that's why we have to match here, very adequately, the potential of our partners, and what they can provide us, they have to understand one very simple thing: we protect them, we protect and protect democracy, so well, we have to receive as much as we can, that's the slogan, english in ukraine will be studied officially soon, at

all levels, it's important, thank you ms. maria for the inclusion, maria mezyntseva, deputy head of the committee on the integration of ukraine with the european union in the verkhovna rada rady, ukraine 9th convocation, nardepka, the guest of our broadcast . this was reported by time of israel with reference to an unnamed israeli official. i noted that on wednesday morning, israel and the us-eu designated terrorist organization hamas agreed to a four-day ceasefire to release hostages on both sides and deliver humanitarian aid to the gaza strip. the start time of the ceasefire and the release date of the hostages are not officially known are reported reuters, however, the office of the israeli prime minister says that it will take place no earlier than friday, that is, tomorrow. it is known that the radical group hamas must release at least 50 israeli hostages, and jerusalem will release them in return. 150 palestinians. leaders of various countries welcomed the four-day truce. and israel said that it could be extended if more

hostages were released. according to the israeli side, hamas holds 240 people captive. i will remind you, the most aggravation in recent decades between israel and the radical hamas organization began on october 7 this year, when hamas militants unexpectedly launched a large-scale rocket attack on israel and simultaneously invaded the territory of ukraine. they killed soldiers and civilians and took hostages. in response, jerusalem declared war on hamas and declared that it would continue until the group was completely destroyed. israel also launched massive rocket attacks in the gaza strip. according to the palestinian health authorities, during the month and a half of hostilities approximately died 14,000 residents of gaza. israel, for its part , reports 1,200 dead. ihor simevolos, executive director of the middle eastern center , is the guest of our broadcast in these seconds. good morning. good morning. mr. igor, do you think whether the actual ceasefire between israel and the hamas organization, which

was recognized as a terrorist organization by the eu and the usa, will be respected. well, i think israel is interested in the return of the hostages, it's one of those important, important elements of judaism, the ransom, the hostage. therefore, i think that, in general, there will be a truce to act, of course, the question is when it will start and when the hostage transfer will begin directly, whether it will start today or on friday, when they promise to transfer the first batch of hostages, but in any case, it seems to me that this is a truce , will be in effect for a certain period of time, so please tell me if there is any light in the context of the possibility of an extension. could this indicate that the conflict may come to an end in the near future, conditionally hamas will lose, israel is there, i don't know, will win, is there anyway to talk about it for now

early? well, this is a difficult question, a difficult question in the sense that there is no clear vision, israel itself does not have a clear vision, not only that how, actually, how to end the conflict and what will happen next, uh, there is a strategic decision , which was accepted, which was supported in principle, by the representatives of the european union, the united states of america, that hamas cannot be the ruling force in gaza, and that's all, as of now, all other aspects, they would remain in the fog, and it's very difficult talk about whether this will be the beginning of de-escalation. or through some time hostilities will resume, what can be said for sure now, well, the pressure on

israel is increasing, increasing from the united states of america, the european union, the arab countries, those that have recognized israel, those that are in communication with israel, respectively pressure is also increasing within israeli society, we have seen numerous demonstrations. in tel aviv , the families of representatives of the hostages, the families of the hostages who demanded the release of these hostages, the adoption of relevant decisions by the government, and the pressure itself is growing netanyahu, there are more and more people in israel who are saying that he should take full responsibility for what happened on october 7 and step down accordingly, so in that sense there are a lot of these... a transition of circumstances that, well

they say that de-escalation is possible, but whether it will be, it is difficult to say, taking into account just the composition of the israeli government itself, do not forget that there are ultra-rights, and it will depend on them whether there will be a coalition in the future or not, mr. geru, there is still here is an important clarification in this context, here is how you predict, how you see how you assess, let's ask this, the primary goals that israel set before itself in order to, as they said, destroy the hamas group, they remain as they are now, is it still possible , somehow there have changed in the context of how events took place, and now we can also be talking about something else , well, netanyahu is speaking most optically, yes, he is saying that after the defeat of hamas, israel will retain control over the sector, yes, that is what this means is difficult to understand. obviously it can mean the reoccupation of gas, it can mean

another blockade, and many other things, let's say. members of the government, some of the members of the ultra-right and the members of parliament of the ruling coalition, they are more sincere and frank, and they talk about the re-occupation of the gas, even there are talks about the deportation of palestinians in the sector, someone there dreams of the restoration of jewish settlements and the like, that is, there is a very a lot of different readings and different signals, yes, the government is now trying to localize them...' localize, i mean, a busy cabinet, so as not to create additional pressure on israel from partners who also ask these questions, there are no clear plans, if we talk about israel's plans, many say that there is no strategy, they just take some tactical actions and sell them as a strategy, and

actually, let's shift the focus a little to ukraine, that 's how much conflict there is between. ha hamasem is really diverting the world's attention from the large-scale russian aggression against ukraine, and how is it divided on the map of the world now, actually war here, war there, how does the world look at it? well, it is clear that the world's attention is really, more now, focused on israel and palestine, that is, this conflict, which is understandable for very, well, for the majority of the public. it is long-standing, there are clear political views regarding this conflict, it is generally such a system-forming conflict, and it is clear that here, for us, it is a problem, it is also a problem from the point of view of ammunition, yes, because it is no longer a secret that often some of the ammunition, especially large

-caliber shells, were diverted from ukraine to israel. and about e, about e formation of a coalition, in principle, the ukrainian coalition is much more than a pro-israel one, and here it is important for us not to lose support, and that neutrality is active, which the leading arab countries had, and so that there is no shift in emphasis and, accordingly, that ukraine remains faithful to the international right and those resolutions that were signed and voted at one time, which provide for the creation on the territory of historical palestine of two states, arab and jewish, this, this is very important for ukraine, is the confirmation of loyalty

international law, but to say that ukraine has been forgotten? no, no, they did not forget about ukraine, because it is still, it is enough to see and remember two speeches, an article by joe biden, the president of the united states of america, to understand that we are included in this context as well. thank you very much for your professional analysis, ihor samovolos, executive director of the center for middle eastern studies, guest of our broadcast, we talked about the fact that israel and the hamas organization, which is recognized as a terrorist organization in the eu and the usa, agreed to stop. for exchange hostages. this is the svoboda ranok project, as always, at this time we inform you about the most important things, subscribe to our youtube channel, like, comment on dates, share videos with friends, besides we are on all other information platforms, where i also invite you to join , and with you on the air, see you tomorrow, take care and have

a safe day as much as possible. it's 10 o'clock on the clock, it's time to find out what is happening in ukraine and the world at this time, khrystyna parubiy is working in the studio. 61-year-old the man was seriously wounded as a result of enemy shelling in the izyum district. the russians attacked at least 18 settlements in the kharkiv region, the head of the region, oleg senigubov, said. in vovchansk, enemy shells hit a utility company, which started a fire. private houses in kupyansk were also damaged as a result of shelling. liquidation of the consequences is ongoing. one person died and another was injured as a result of