will give to the needs of the armed forces of ukraine. the total was about 17 hryvnias. i don't know that i would have helped everyone so that the war would not have happened, whatever i could, i would have helped so that the war would not have happened, and that's all, me, that, the same, life, well, we just live on then, after communicating with volunteers and the military, relatives advised mrs. nadiya to buy a drone, they say, it is a very popular annual. and two days later, when such an idea arose , the drone was already at mrs. nadiya’s, but it would seem so small and breaks the hut, breaks everything and everything, well, just think about it, children, the relatives of nadia believe that this example with the drone will inspire other people to continue helping, because there are many needs for the ukrainian army, they say, well, you understand, the state is not visible, so far it is not able

to provide everything completely, because, well , at first a lot of people were actively involved in this help, now is such a time, it is now cold, and now the boys will again need some clothes and some food, the modern russian-ukrainian war, says mrs. nadiya, is crueler than it was world war ii, at least from what she remembers, the woman notes that she especially aches for the ukrainian children who are suffering from hostilities and who were illegally...ported to russia, however , she says, she does not lose faith, well, i think that there will be victory for us, we pray for them, that there will be victory, lord, god, he says, lord , lord of my life, god, help that this war ends and that those children return home, to their families, to their parents and children, the purchased drone was handed over to the soldiers of the sniper company of the 80th separate airborne assault unit.

svoboda ranok, this is a svoboda ranok project, a project about an important thing, don't miss it in the broadcast. and did the famine affect your family, already tomorrow ukraine will remember those who died during the years of the famine. however, despite long-term research, the exact number of victims of the events, which three dozen countries have already recognized as genocide, is still unknown. why is it so important and what should be known about the famine today? in the parliament. blocked the bill on the legalization of medical cannabis due to a large number of amendments from people's deputies, the members of the committee on health of the nation, medical care and health insurance olha stefanyshina, whether the deputy will support the draft law, which, according to many activists, should help cancer patients and post-traumatic stress disorders caused by the war. when this will happen and what are the main comments of the opponents of the legalization of medanabis, we will talk further. if you have thoughts on topics that could be discussed on the broadcast, be sure to share. in

the comments. the draft law on the legalization of medical cannabis has been blocked in the council, reported deputy from the voice olga stefanyshyn according to her, people's deputies submitted 882 amendments to the draft law, which the parliament is currently considering. for three months, the comments were considered in the committees , consultations were held with agraias, the national police and the public, but the motherland faction, the leader of which is yulia tymoshenko, opposes the legalization of medical cannabis and submitted to the project... 226 amendments, which stefanyshina called a grave. most of these amendments, says nardepka, her colleagues want to slow down the consideration of the draft law and deprive it of votes in the session hall. the deputy says that all constructive comments were taken into account, and everything was done so that the law would be implemented next year, as soon as the relevant acts are adopted by the cabinet of ministers. let me remind you that in the summer of this year, the verkhovna rada supported the legalization of medical cannabis in the first reading, 268 people's deputies voted for it, and already in october , the specialized committee... changed the bill

to the second reading. the cabinet of ministers of ukraine also supported the project. the national security and defense council of ukraine also called for the legalization of honey-cannabis, citing world practice and the urgent need for ukrainian realities. medicines based on medical cannabis are used to reduce pain, spasms and convulsions, treat anorexia, post-mortem syndromes and anxiety disorders. also, these drugs are necessary for seriously ill and palliative patients, among whom are oncology and diabetes patients. medical cannabis is legalized in 56 countries. the world, in particular in the usa, the countries of the european union and great britain. oleksiy kucherenko, the people of ukraine, the ninth convocation, the motherland faction joins our broadcast, i congratulate you. congratulations, good morning, glory to ukraine. and we are also waiting for the representative of the voice fraction, olga stefanyshyn, who should also join, but we will start with you, mr. oleksiy. so why did the motherland faction submit as many as 200 amendments if you are against legalization.

medical cannabis itself and against this law in general, i apologize, but about the fact that we are against legalization, drugs, cultivation and sale. of drugs in ukraine, it is well known, papia even before the first hearing and these discussions were very heated in society, very hot in the verkhovna rada, and actually speaking, when adopting the law in the first reading, we already explained 100 times why i can now 101 times, mr. oleksiy, we will stop there, but just for understanding, if the faction opposes, there will be no vote , that is, by submitting these amendments, do you thus want to slow down its adoption, or why is the homeland faction submitting these amendments? i would suggest you first of all not to manipulate here on the air, i'm not pandering, i 'm asking you a question, that's why submitting edits

deputies to the second over reading is the absolute european norm for the passage of draft laws, amendments are submitted to very many draft bills, and 1,000, and two, and three submitted to budget draft bills, to others, and their consideration in the hall is absolutely... a normal parliamentary procedure, therefore, the hysteria surrounding the fact that this is something so extraordinary is nothing more than the hysteria of certain lobby groups, which simply for the sake of vital interests see the passing of this bill, i personally am the author of several amendments, and i is ready to defend them on any forum, it is possible here olga stefanyshina, who mentioned that you evaluate the amendments that were submitted, it is necessary to note not only the representatives of the homeland, also european solidarity submitted amendments, and deputies of the pro-government faction servant of the people also submitted about three hundred amendments, how can you comment on this, ms. olga, good morning, well, first of all, i want to thank those colleagues who really submitted

very good substantive amendments, and some of those amendments were adopted, and i believe what today... the law looks so good that we can expect, if we pass this law this year, next year, after the cabinet passes by-laws, that people will be able to get medicine immediately, we have written it like this, and we held negotiations with the ministry of health and the ministry of internal affairs, with agricultural associations, organizations, so the text is quite like this, well, it is of high quality, i will say that until the amendments of some deputies, well, i read them all, because this i was just curious yes, and now i'm opening yulia

tymoshenko's edit, and i see, for example, that there are almost 10 exercises that she submitted, just as an example, and some of these? 200 is with some amendments, it is just spam, because the amendment first includes the entire clause, then with the next amendment, each paragraph of this sub-clause is then removed , then it is asked to be included again, this is called technical spam, which the homeland faction uses to simply block law, this amendment does not make any sense, it does not improve or worsen the law, it is just to have a minute in the hall. speech, and pr on this topic, unfortunately, today in the parliament, this celebration of populism is still possible, at that time people with great pains, with stress, are waiting for their medicine, because the deputies today decided to block this draft law,

in particular the deputies faction of the fatherland, there is a representative of the faction of the fatherland, let 's listen to the position so that it is objective, and the palexium, thank you, well, let's do it, because these manipulations are real. they are already going beyond the limits, i want, i don't want a discussion put, i am addressing the ukrainians, i claim that today absolutely nothing opposes or interferes with the use of drugs that include cannabis, this is all the prerogative of the government, and according to the relevant government resolution, the list of these medical drugs is approved annually, and the government simply calmly buys them for budget money, has all the powers to ensure that our soldiers, our patients, really receive these medicines in the proper way, in the proper amount, this is all complete manipulation, but we had a minister

of health in our faction, and once again i rewatched it the video, i can give it to you, it is a recording when they asked the honorable minister one key question, please tell me, here is the law passed, when you will be able to make ukrainian medicines on the basis of the ukrainian so-called medical plant growing there, he said at least three. .. four years, this is his direct language, so the manipulations are primitive around the fact that the homeland is against medicines for the sick, this is a very negative non-european absolute practice of a certain political force, pay attention, they said about 860 edits, but for some reason ms. stefanishina all the time one and the same thing, tymoshenko's homeland, yes, we do not accept your medical reform, we know that you worked as an intercessor.

mr. oleksiy, let's not get personal, we are talking specifically in the context of the draft law, and not the medical reform as a whole, i already mentioned this level of aggression on your broadcast, maybe i will comment, that is, regarding the resolution of the corrupt stepanov, i remember, we remember we blame the whole minister, it was he who approved and wrote the resolution, then in fact it does not correspond to reality, unfortunately, we see it in practice, the resolution is doesn't work, no medicine in ukraine, it was approved by the government for a year and a half, so you understand, nothing happens, there is no medicine, because that's why it's absolutely not true, i think that every time you invent a new argument against the law, you just going against the people, in fact, today you talk about a resolution, tomorrow you talk about something else , and these are, well, these kinds of excuses to just block the law, so i really just want

people to understand how cynical the parliament looks today, when he comes up with arguments, well, just from the finger, which do not work, if this resolution you are talking about worked, there would be no patient rallies, no briefings by veterans' organizations, which were, i simply asked the parliamentarians to finally pass this law. today we followed the european practice, i know that we should release you sooner, that is, you consider it important to pass this law and you believe that the parliament will find the votes to pass it as soon as possible, considering the fact that such a number of applications were submitted , we have no choice but to pass this law and give people need medicines, because these medicines relieve pain, they relieve stress, and more than 6 million ukrainians need them today. mr. oleksiy, we have limited air time, yours is three or four. the main comments from those amendments that you submitted in particular, we literally have a minute and a half to finish, even less, maybe, and what comments, amendments

are absolutely reasonable, well thought out, cannabis drugs can only be prescribed in the absence of alternatives, only those with a proven track record are used efficiency, production activity and transportation and implementation only by state structures, no business should be done on this, immediately all lobbyists forget...' to say that this is huge money, this is billions of business, you don't understand, their main argument is that 1 hectare with cannabis milks , gives a million dollars of profit, this is the main argument, and in their dreams they see fields sown with this cannabis and ukraine becomes the center of narcotic substances, cultivation and distribution, they do not hide it, so i want to say once again that the motherland is fundamentally against this bill, if the amendments of the homeland are taken into account, will there be two hundred? there will be no support for this draft law in general, even if budeho follows his own procedure

, why these tantrums, why is the normal parliamentary procedure followed, and the very fact that this degree is rising shows how much money is at stake for this draft law, well, that’s it, in conclusion the procedure is just going on, that is , one way or another, if amendments are submitted, the procedure is delayed conditional on the adoption of this draft law, listen, well, a lot of laws were passed in this way, well, here, well, every the third bill passes the certificate. what is not here, what is so unprecedented here, why these emotions, i see artificially made against the background of problems of the state, energy, military, add one more problem, to split the country, that is the purpose of these tantrums, we will not play this game, i thank you for tuning in, oleksiy kucherenko, people's representative of ukraine from the homeland faction, as well as olga stefanyshina , representative of the voice, were guests of our broadcast, we talked about medical cannabis, which caused so many emotions on our broadcast. and now you can... assume what is happening in the parliament when this bill is being discussed. thanks for enabling. tomorrow in

ukraine, the memory of the victims of the holodomors will be commemorated, it is about the massive artificial famines of 1921-22, as well as 1946 and 47, and the officially recognized genocide of the holodomors of 1932 and 33 . this year marks his 90th anniversary. it was the result of the purposeful policy of the communist totalitarian regime, i say. in the ukrainian institute of national memory, and its purpose was to suppress ukrainian resistance to the regime, noted in the national museum of the genocide famine. the truth about the holodomor in the soviet union carefully. were hidden, but the tragedy of the famine affected many ukrainian families. our correspondent ruksulana bychay asked ukrainians in kyiv what they currently know about the holodomor, i am in the 33rd year, i am 90, so you were just born when it was in such dark times, i couldn’t guess, but i survived, i have several relatives who died in those years in the village

of sobolivka, vinnytsia region, the city was probably not so terrible as in the villages of 46-47 i remember that year well, those were also such hungry, difficult years, i caught a pigeon, somehow shot it down and it was a great happiness, we got meat in the family, my grandmother told me, the neighbors ate their boy, then, when they came to them, they found a few more heads in the basement. told me that the holodomor was created artificially, because they came with weapons and took everything they could, i myself am from the kherson region, the village of darivka, actually my great-grandmother, she talked a lot about the holodomor, about what happened in her family, a lot died like her relatives, and in general, i see how it was imprinted on

our family, about certain patterns, about how we stockpile, about how our attitude towards chli... like, i catch it in my mind, always when my grandmother told stories, she didn't talk about who organized the famine, she always just talked about the fact that there was a famine, she told a lot of terrible, well, kind of events, what they ate , how they survived, my grandmother told me that when she was little, her mother talked about how it happened in their region, these were stories related to cannibalism, for example, such a legend or not a legend, no one knows anymore, about the fact that a young girl lived in the village, and she disappeared during the famine, and probably she ate the exact number of victims of the famine of 32-3 years is still unknown, but historians say that there were millions of dead. different numbers are called, from two million to more than 10. in recent years , there have even been scandals among scientists on this topic, about the difficulties

of calculating the victims of the holodomor, a journalist rfe/rl's halyna tereshchuk spoke with historian andrii kozytskyi. you can read the full interview of this conversation on the radio liberty website, watch it on the youtube channel of radio liberty and radio liberty ukraine. i suggest you listen to an excerpt from this conversation. the debate about the number of victims is, to a large extent, a consequence of the fact that the soviet authorities did everything possible to hide their crime, and later to destroy even the traces of its commission. according to the definition he proposed. sociologist paul conerton, what happened to memory of the holodomor, we can call it a tactic of forced erasure. for a long time, the soviet authorities did not allow us to talk about it at all, falsified demographic information, and therefore attempts to recreate the real number of victims began late enough and

there were no source materials that could accurately allow us to determine this number of victims. the numbers you mentioned appear in the scientific environment, but each of them has its own claims, the fact is that in order to get some strictly scientifically based number, you need to agree, at least about three things, the first thing is about the research methodology, how exactly we try to get this figure, whether we, for example, compare the number of people who lived in ukraine before the holodomor and after it, and here the first difficulties arise, because the censuses in soviet ukraine took place in in 1926, that is, long before the famine, and then in 1937 and 1939, also after a certain period after the famine, moreover, the census data of the 37th year were falsified and there are ongoing discussions as to how much we

can use them. the second thing about which it is necessary to agree, in order to get a single figure that would satisfy everyone , this is who we consider victims of the famine, because it is not only about those people who died of hunger, but also, let's say, repressed, those people who were deported to siberia, they were sent into exile, people died there, not always they died in 32-3 years, but if, for example, they were repressed, in the context of grain procurement in this period. they are justified, they should probably be considered as victims of the famine, and finally the third thing, which also does not fully allow us to agree on how the final number of victims of the famine should be is a question of whether we should take into account the so-called excess mortality,

because the figure of 3.9 million assumes that these are the people who died in 1932-33, minus the natural mortality of this period , this is almost a million people, but a logical question may arise here if a person had to die of old age. in december of 1933, and she died of hunger in january of 1933, so should she, and is it logical, not be considered as a victim of the famine, so discussions about the number of victims continue, moreover, sometimes they take on such a sharp confrontational form, the deliberate or deliberate exaggeration of data on the number of ukrainians killed as a result of the holodomors can play into the hands of those who do not recognize it as a historical fact, so says lesya hasidjak, acting general director of the national museum of the holodomor genocide. it is primarily about modern russia, in which these events are denied, about what number of the dead can be considered correct, and also about what

is happening with the policy of memory of the holodomor in the temporarily occupied territories, lesya gasjadzhak said in a comment to katerina nekrechii. i am a supporter and follower of the following situation, on the topic of demographics of the famine, on the topic of demographic losses during the years of the famine. only those who have researched this topic have the right to speak, that is, we theoretically can as patriots, as ukrainians call with reference to german diplomats, to italian diplomats who called the number 10 million, losses and the like, of course we can do it by referring , also referring to other people who called the number 2 million, such numbers also exist, but...' a researcher can competently speak , in my understanding, this is a demographer, today in ukraine there is one institute of demography and

social research named after ptuha, the number they arrived at as a result of research is 3 .9 million, this is the excess mortality, that is, this is the excess mortality from the genocide in 32-33, if you count total losses with hypothetically those natural ones that could have been, regardless of whether or not there was a genocide, uh, this , 4.600, 4 million, it seems somehow so, is this a true figure or final, this figure is the responsibility of demographers, they call this figure , they arrived at it by the method of their research, and i personally and many scientists trust them and rely on... this figure , to say whether this figure is true or false , i can't, because i'm not a demographer, i didn't do the research, i can judge the truth of the figure, or the falsity,

understanding whether there were any studies, approvals of this figure, discussions in a professional scientific environment, er, criticism, can be , criticism of the discussion and everything else is normal, logical, understandable scientific. process, well, the number 3.9, it was established for a long time, and until alternative, alternative numbers appeared, in particular , the one that turned all life in ukraine, it is scientifically in ukraine, it is a number of 10.5 million. uh, whether this number is true, again, i don't know, because i'm not a demographer, but i trust what's in the information space first. the appearance of this number was accompanied not only by a scandal, but also by direct testimonies of people who at that time worked in

the national museum of the holodomor of genocide and explained that this number is falsified, it is invented, why do those who do it need it, i can admit that it is such a complex, on the one hand, a victim complex, when we, as a nation that lived for several decades under the conditions of... not to talk about the famine, when in soviet times a generation will grow up who knew nothing about it, about the fact that their relatives died, about the fact that genocide was committed against the nation, and one of the tools artificial famine became the genocide, but there were other tools, such as repression against the church, the repression of the intelligentsia, and the like, i can assume that this trauma is speaking to us now, which wants us to recognize that the whole world recognizes a much higher number, because it seems that the bigger the number, the bigger our mountain, but the un convention on the prevention of the crime of genocide, it does not define the number of casualties as some... defining feature

for the interpretation of genocide, whether these acts were genocide or not, if even 10 people were killed because of their racial, national or religious affiliation with with a special intention, this is already genocide, and it does not matter whether it is 3 million, or 5 million, or 10 million. there may be another goal, it is the discrediting of the very topic of the holodomor, because as we know, the enemies of ukraine... then take this the story with falsified examinations or something similar and interpreted, as you can see, they have ukrainians, they made everything up, they have it all falsifications, we told them that there was no famine, but they said that there was, now they said that they draw this number, as they write, as they want, as they see fit necessary, in this way we give bread into the hands of the enemies of ukraine, primarily the russians, i

would like to ask this: about the situation in the occupied territories, this question may seem so rhetorical, but on the other hand, i think it is important to talk about it as well , according to your information, what is the situation in the occupied ukrainian territories, is the occupying russian government erasing the memory of the holodomor, relatively speaking, will schoolchildren studying in the occupied territories know the truth about the holodomor, well, the earliest examples that i can remember , this mountains of books on the history of ukraine prepared for burning and burning, including editions of our museum and just editions on the subject of the holodomor, that is , the russians came after occupying the territory, are revising the library, the russians are burning the new things that form, that helped in the formation of identity

in working with young people and the like, respectively, so the story of the famine in the book is evil for them, and it is destroyed by them, and the second story is an example of the monument to the victims of the famine in mariupol, which was shown last year, was dismantled, making for this accompanying a parallel program, as i call it, that is, by including in the process the teachers of a local university, well, collaborators, of course, students , some, well, they did such a staged action, i urge you to subscribe to the youtube channel of radio liberty ukraine, this is radio liberty and radio liberty ukraine, there are two youtube channels , and in particular, on the youtube channel of radio liberty ukraine, there is a very interesting material about how a witness of the holodomor event remembers those times, it is called there was nothing to eat, and the ussr took away food by ships, and you can watch this material, there is a lot

memories, this is really important information in the context of history, well, the ministry of defense of ukraine says that in 2024 the government will spend about 175 billion uah on missiles and ammunition, this information is already from the radio liberty website, deputy minister of defense yuriy reported this in particular dzhigar, his words were quoted in the press service of the ministry of defense, i would like to remind you that radio liberty is present on all platforms, it is youtube, and instagram and all the platforms that exist, also look for us in tiktok for short informative videos view, share them with friends, it is important that you and i are friends on these platforms. because then you will have the opportunity to quickly receive verified information, which is very, very important, the goal we set for ourselves is that the information is verified, so subscribe to our platforms, follow them, well, in the comments in the chat, while there is still such an opportunity under broadcast, write what topics you are interested in, maybe these topics will become the topics of our next broadcasts, thank you for being with us, the weekend is ahead, we wish them as safe as possible, we will meet with you from monday, this is the freedom of the mornings project, my name is oleg galiv , see you,

it's 10 o'clock on the clock, it's time to find out what 's happening in ukraine and the world at this time, in the studio. khrystyna parubiy works. three people died and 11 were injured in the kherson region. among the injured are two children. a 15-year-old boy and his 11-year-old sister were injured during shelling in kherson. oleksandr prokudin, the head of the regional military administration, informed. russian in a day terrorists shelled the region 119 times, fired into residential quarters of populated areas. 22 inhabited...