civilians were fired upon. my daughter came, i hoped that it was not them, it turned out that they were in this colony. mr. serhiy's daughter died together with her husband, but five-year-old yaroslav survived. a boy who also traveled in this convoy survived and was baptized. it was he who saved the child and allegedly managed to get to luhansk together with yaroslav. there, the man and his godson apparently spent some time in the hospital, and then, it is not known, he left for russia in the belohorod region, allegedly ended up in the luhansk hospital, my grandson's godson and mother, son-in-law, and supposedly yaroslav, my grandson are there in the dreams of the belarsk region, now they have been transported from luhansk, i don’t know how it happened at all , they don’t want to communicate with anyone, they don’t communicate, i don’t know what is happening there at all, to this day, i cannot do anything to return my grandson... whether mr. serhiy's grandson

is really in russia now and whether he is really in the belohorod region is not known for certain, so if suddenly someone has information about yaroslav maigur and his possible whereabouts, do not delay and immediately call us to the magnolia child tracing service at the short number 1163. from any ukrainian mobile operator, calls are free. i am asking everyone. knows about my grandson, where is he, what is he doing, how is he feeling, please let me know, this is very important to me, for me, the last child of my family, i don't know who to rely on anymore, we have created a resource thanks to which you can report any crime against a child, anywhere, anytime, just go to the site and report, and we'll launch all possible mechanisms take the punishment

of the criminal: stop crime ua. in the russian federation, what in my opinion is happening right now? mr. dmitry, when you say, they, they, they, you have someone specific in mind now, the cooperative, i said the politburo, so far solovei has identified patryshev as the head of this politburo, but this is a whole group of people, well, i think that plus or minus - these are those who were at the russian security council when putin spoke about the start of the war against ukraine. ugh. mr. dmytro, but in the russian media, in particular , there is information that the kremlin is likely will want to expose a technically sparring partner, so to speak, a possibility.

well, someone, let's say, who will make such a certain competition, so conditional to putin, and among the candidates who want to put forward their candidacy from the kremlin's submission, there must be someone who publicly opposes the war with ukraine, in order to somehow legitimize , that is, for example, let this anti-war candidate, conditionally speaking, get 1.5 percent, putin gets 85%, and this will be an argument, look, the russian people, he is under...' continuation of hostilities, continuation yes so-called, special military operation, but does the kremlin need such a candidate and is it dangerous, because if this person crosses a certain, let's say, well, as far as i understand the line, regarding criticism towards putin, then such a number of people can actually vote for him, that it will be difficult, for example, to say right away that this is a one-and-a-half-year candidate, oleksiy, i think that immediately on this person, if such ratings do not appear, immediately on this person... there will be a case,

there will be a lot - a lot of nuances, kremlin himself will nominate an anti-war technical candidate, well, he may nominate, but i wonder if he is needed, is it dangerous , yes or no, well, i think that if such a candidate flies through russia, for example, to novosibirsk, then something will happen to the engine of this plane, and unfortunately, everyone will talk about the fact that this candidate did not make it to the elections, well, i think that something like this will happen to a person, they will show him what once happened to prigozhny, well, first of all, i think that , what you are talking about, it looks like bee's plan, if no one recognizes patrushev as the leader of this politburo, which offers something to the world and ukraine, well, accordingly, they will say , well, well, then we will continue to live with putin, and putin should continue to rule our country called russia, ah, well, then, according to this plan bye, they will use such an alternative candidate

, as they always used, because in all the elections there was someone who is an alternative to putin, a democratic alternative, that is, they are still playing this game that russia is a country that elects. the president, and of course he is the candidate can say something about us, about the need for some kind of peaceful coexistence in the world, and so on , but listen, i think that the whole propaganda machine will be turned on, which will tell that this candidate is wrong, and they will say very reasonedly for russians with vodka how is it correct to understand what this candidate is saying, well, listen, they study stalin and continue to study it even now, and stalin tells them that everything is equal, how people vote, it is important how it is counted, so i do not see any problems neither for the politburo of the collective putin, nor for putin himself, if they go with plan b, that is, they will elect , reassign, let's say, putin, to the position of governing this country on

some further topic, ugh, but let's talk a little about russian legislation, if you don't mind, uh, a perversely spicy topic, in fact, if you get into it, then, according to him, the presidential elections in russia, the federation council must make a decision to announce, no earlier than 100 days and no later than 90 days until the day of the vote, in fact, we have the date of the 17th december, later than december 17, a decision cannot be made. mr. alexander, will we see his decision before that time, and what will be his harbinger, maybe just otti. successes on the front, which they are now trying to achieve, the russian side, the enemy side, maybe as soon as they tentatively have it, even if it is not there, they will draw it, this success, after that we will hear from putin, probably what, what he goes like this, actually, attempts to take the avdiivka

bridgehead avdiivka, they are exactly, and correlate, with this question of putin's possible elections, so that they need sleep now. which can be articulated, of course, they cannot take any big city, that is, we are not talking about kherson there, or any other city, but even capture, we remember what happened with the defense, capturing bakhmut or north donetsk, capturing avdiivka for them will be a success that they will see as another stage of progress in this war, that is , they, an analogy comes to mind here... saddam hussein, when desert storm was an operation in '91, you remember, and broken there were all the tank units of this iraqi soldier, when he went back to iraq , he announced that they won this war,

defeated all these coalitions that were under the nato flag, and represented in the domestic market, it was like a victory, russia it also follows the same path, that is, propaganda does not always take into account what is happening in reality, what are the facts that have already been accomplished and the same military achievements, because there are some small advances, but at the same time, to make, to form this victory, which should be you know, sacrificial, but suffering, and now they need another such hook, from which they will move on and create a new one. theirs in the fact that they will create a history of winners on the battlefield, this is a challenge that for ukraine is, well, overcoming the meat assaults that rush to obtain this audio, and here it is important not to allow

this, such a victory in the benches russia, and of course, take into account this political... element in its question of such an alternative, let's say, will this political instability be on the russian horizon? no, it does not exist and it will not exist, that is, they determine it themselves, and this is actually the implementation of the plan , which is carried out with the simple use of this instrument of sanctification through the election, let’s call it... that’s right, and let’s recall the analogy of medvedev’s election, which was, well appeared out of nowhere, in fact he became the president, who performed such, a little, let's say, puppet, position and puppet role, but at the same time there may be such an option, that is,

but he is now as an alternative to the military, military success can be some kind of political, but in any case we are in general, we are talking about the issue of the stability of political power in russia, it is currently cemented by an autocratic system, and here is the question of how it can undergo internal changes or external influence in order to have this system of political power that is not determined by the political process of elections , it is determined by other factors , that is, for this government to undergo transformation and change, and here the question of losses, big losses on the battlefield, the question of economic and political losses that are happening today, but they are not domestic political, market, and, it is

, in fact, well, lower and lower dropping russia in the ranking of states on the international arena, and not allowing it, we remember that russia tried, for example, why it fought for the right to hold football championship, the olympics, she wanted to be such an active international player who is constantly in the circle of all states and organizes something, and there is such a desire to legitimize herself in reality and to establish herself here and there, it is a little painful for russia, throwing her out of international platforms should continue, and russia should become less, and it should first be defined its clear position that it is a pariah state, which, well, on a level with one like north korea, should stand there somewhere and watch how to move in the democratic world. and in what direction, this is a question, and the question of the influence of this political regime

that exists in russia, regarding its possible transformation into other forms, well, the washington post and a number of other western media claim that the dictator putin is going to go to the elections not with military slogans, despite what we see on the front and the efforts of the occupiers capture, further settlements, on the territory of ukraine, they say, the popularity of the war in russia is decreasing, and here you can trust, not trust various statistical studies there, especially russian ones, you can just look at the west in google and in yandex, for example, just interesting fact, over the last year there have been inquiries in google and yandex related to the purchase or sale of symbols of things with symbols, for example, of the so -called special military operation. or there were banners, some posters glorifying russian soldiers, they fell from

there is some historical maximum there, absolutely down, that is, we see that the popularity of the war inside russia seems to be absent, and here it immediately seems logical to conclude that putin can go for other slogans, for this process, which they call elections there, mr. dmytro, what do you think, first of all, please comment on whether the popularity of war is really decreasing within the russian federation itself, and what putin is up to, with what slogans he can go to the elections this year, offensive, next year, yes sorry er, yes, well, first of all, you know, i recently watched an interview with khrushcheva, who spoke about her impressions when she walked through moscow, specifically walked through moscow, just during the prigozhin rebellion, and she observed some surrealism, that is, she says , that i'm going to a wedding somewhere, people are walking there with strollers, so no one is afraid that prigorzhin will run here to moscow now, and

one woman with whom she was talking said that listen, we prefer putin, that's why that with putin we are walking here, we have everything here fine, and pryguzhin will take everyone and fight, well, forever against the ukrainians, against everyone else , that is, there was a mood that these people definitely do not want war, and for them putin is better, because he will not lead them to what they can and do want war, they are not against war, they do not want to fight here themselves. let's put it this way, they themselves, they themselves definitely don't want to fight, it's one, two, well, there are a lot of these sofa aggressors who drink vodka on the couch, eat sliotka there and shout that we're going to bomb london, well, our permanent, our a regular guest is oleksandr shulga, the head of the center for the study and research of russia, he conducted sociological research inside russia, interviewed russians about their attitude, about the war, and so-and-so reigns there , so-and-so said inside russia, as if he personally had a telephone call, yes, by phone

, and they introduced themselves as russian researchers and polled the public opinion of russians, and there is an interesting thesis that mostly russians support the war, but when it comes to mobilizing them directly or their relatives, they do not mobilize want, that is, they want someone to fight with the ukrainians, for example, conquer new territories there, then they don't want to have anything to do with it, it's just an interesting fact. mr. dmytro, about what you are talking about, yes, yes, yes, well, this is exactly what i am talking about, that, whatever they say there, whatever they say in sociological studies, various russian sociological, well, so-called sociological groups. did not say that they support putin, support the war, support svo, as they say, and so on, in fact, well, they don't want to fight and die themselves, and well, the second point that is worth talking about is that, well, too many, russians are dying in this, in this war, and well, it already affects the consciousness of those people who are

by the families of the dead, or by friends or acquaintances there, or... who cooperated with these people there, and that is, to hide the fact that such a huge number is dying, well, it is already impossible, and a question arises for them, well, listen, they are talking about , that everything is fine, this is not a war, this is svo, and we were promised that it would be easy and quick a walk, and these are huge losses, and people, of course, in the russian federation, people have lost the opportunity to think, but they have huge problems with thinking, they... draw those conclusions that are not related to the thinking process, they draw conclusions, which are related to what they heard on the tv, and the tv gives them an algorithm of what to say, but this algorithm, it breaks the inner thirst of a person into the desire to think, and when they have this desire at least think arises, they face an internal problem, too many people

are dying, what is going on, isn't this a war, and of course they don't want to participate in it themselves, that is, the contacts i am trying to track there in russia say that a lot of people there have taken their husbands or children away abroad, or hidden so far that they will not be found, because they are afraid of mobilization, that is, the internal instinct of russians says that they do not want to fight, and this is a huge problem for putin, that is why he and his politburo do not declare war , that's why they...' admit that the mobilization that putin signed does not have a signature, that the mobilization is over, partly mobilization, it continues, and people are somehow found there and sent to the war, well, we are not talking about the pension system, what are they doing with the , and recently this one of the glaring cases, when the man who organized the murder of politkovsky was

acquitted of criminal responsibility for the fact that he fought against us, against ukraine, the word symptom is very serious, yes, because we remember as prigozhin involved prisoners, that is, we can say that this trend is still going on, are now only those who were previously recruited fighting against the defense forces, just so that our viewers understand, the case that says that the man who organized the murder of politkovsky, received amnesty and continues to fight, says that those who are in prison are called up, sent to war and given a promise that they will be released, by the way, in society, among the relatives of those mobilized in the russian federation there are also huge negativity regarding regarding that but the prisoners are called up and after six months they are promised freedom, and those mobilized

who were mobilized, they still continue without rotation, well actually refer to slaughter, and this is also one of the points of conflict that is not resolved by this society, they they don't know what to do about it, it's a huge problem for them, that's why jailers, prisoners continue to be sent to war, they continue to fight, willingly or die, so that they don't live the miserable life they live in prison, or get, well at least some possibility of obtaining freedom, that is, we described that an unpopular war, then on what other theses can putin go to these elections, if not on a military topic, let's say this , well, look, that's why, i think, the politburo decided that putin in the fans, yes, and that is why they are trying to emphasize that patrushev has now entered the public arena , and like, he is in charge of the whole situation, in this way, they understand that they have a huge problem, and they can soon

fall very hard , they are afraid of it, and for that, to show the world that they are ready to negotiate, let's leave things as they are. but let's sign peace agreements, they buried putin in the pubic area, so this is just a sign that they are in an impasse and they don't know how to get out of it, so, well, they are on the brink, they are on the brink, and if this continues, well, in fact, in fact, the next year can be absolutely devastating for them, both for the kremlin and for russia, hey, gentlemen, let's talk about one point, about what literally a month ago the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe recognized russia is a dictatorship and has called on all members and all states of the council of europe not to recognize the legitimacy of the head of the russian federation, after the end of his tenure in this position, of course, we do not yet know how the elections in russia will end, whether they will take place, we suspect,

we suspect, because eh, because they have this question forever, but this is the decision of the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe, in particular, whether it will have any influence on the situation with the elections in russia and whether, perhaps just that, the members of the apere will somehow react and the world in general can maybe somehow legally influence what is happening in the unrecognized elections in russia, well, for example, so what's next, well, how much will it actually affect the perception of putin as the leader of russia there, putin is illegitimate and the elections are not recognized, so look, the council of europe and today there are 46 member states, this is all of europe, except for belarus and the russian federation, during all elections, both parliamentary, presidential and local, there have always been observation missions, including from the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe, they were held in

to ukraine, in particular together with the osce and the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe, when it came to local ones, it was the congress of local regional councils of europe and so on , the presidential as well as the parliamentary assembly sends its monitors, who are the international controller that approves the quality of the elections, and in fact, to some extent legitimizes them in the international arena. the refusal of the parliamentary assembly to recognize the results of these elections in advance shows that, well, first of all, there is no question of their participation as observers in these elections goes in general, and russia is now a zone of total uncontrolled situation from the side of any international observers, whether it is the council of europe, or the united nations, or the osce, which would give an independent view of what is happening

in this state, and accordingly, this is a decision that is political, because the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe is political, it is a consultative body , in fact of the council of europe, such a decision, it, is a recommendation, no more than, and at the same time, it is such a definite signal as to how a position is being formed on the european continent, in general, regarding putin's power in russia and the position of russia as a state, which, well, has its own dimension, according to the scale of democratic values, because the council of europe is their e, three well-known, fundamental, principles of existence, this is supremacy rights these are human rights and pluralistic democracy, none of these principles are currently present in the russian federation, in fact, this was the reason

for them to be deprived of membership in the council of europe, starting from march 16 last year, by the way, it will be just as well the second anniversary of the absence of russia, if we are talking about march 17 next year 2024 , in fact, on march 16, they were thrown out of the council from the council. yes, we have the second anniversary of the actually undemocratic existence of this state. ugh. but in general, if, if not recognized, yes, if not recognized, the election is not recognized, if the president, not recognized. the same situation with lukashenka, the results, the results, the election, which were not recognized at the level of the council of europe and at the level of the european union, that is, it is actually not recognized as legitimate. the head of state and with him

there are no negotiations or he is not present in any diplomatic communication in the capacity of the head of state, that is, this is complete isolation, diplomatic, this is an attempt to create isolation, as we understand it, we mean from the side, from the side of the civilized world, well , we are talking... now about 46 states that have adopted this decision, this is the level of the council of europe, if the country has an unrecognized leader, the civilized world, what then happens to the representative offices of this country in other countries, with embassies, with representatives in various different instances, this good question, but nothing happens, for example, if the president is not recognized , so is he legitimate, then, for example, the minister of foreign affairs, so, so and so, by the way, this is one of the issues that is related to who will

brought to justice for the commission of a crime, and now there is a stumbling block between the ukrainian side and our foreign partners, who also support us in this process, and actually, the question is whether this trio is functional, that is, the president, the minister of foreign affairs and the prime minister, they are subject to persecution, whether they will remain with their immunity, because someone has to sign the act of surrender figuratively. saying, somebody has to be responsible and somebody will be entrusted with the implementation of that decision, and accordingly, if there is no person who will be responsible for the implementation of those decisions, then it will be a problem, this is one such dilemma that is being solved now and at the international level, but this does not mean that it is necessary to ask the question that putin will automatically be recognized based on the results of the elections that

will take place or not, there, let's say, his status as president will continue due to various legislative tricks there, let's say, because here it is also quite simple to do and create such a mechanism that would extend the term of office in this position to some there for an indefinite time, in a state of limbo, and it can last for years, there are such practices, that is, most likely they will go this way, that they, taking into account the martial law that they plan to sign, that is his, his tenure. elections do not take place and thus on capitulation under the capitulation will be signed by putin himself, such a scenario can be recognized that it will turn out that putin will no longer be alive then, then they will show us another refrigerator and say that it has been lying there for 5 years, that is, here, russia is now playing a magician,

with which one must continue, to keep a very close and careful attention, and that table at which putin is sitting reminds me of something, such an attribute of an illusionist who, you know, hides a lot of all kinds of things in that table, therefore, all this is not accidental things, there is neither concrete nor eh, let's say the conviction, where is the real putin, in what specific situation, since there are doubles that are constantly exposed to different ones. and this is not a secret, but also the question of putin’s existence and, we will not go into these mythological theories now, but he is the functionally recognized leader of the state today, the president-elect, who is completing his term there, where there are other representatives who they can, let's say

, speak... on his behalf, and once again the responsibility for the actions taken between all these representatives is shared, that's another thing too question, but for today, i think that the world should ask questions about the existence of a state with this type of government, where this personified power is also blurred behind such manipulative, let's say, scenes, when it is not possible to hold a specific person accountable for committing actions, although we know, issued, by the way, another anniversary , this march 17, 2023 , an arrest warrant was issued for mr. putin from the international criminal court, yes, that is why there is a fourth date, which will also be in the next 2024, it will be

there is exactly an anniversary. of this arrest warrant, and dmytro vasiliev is also with us, mr. dmytro, in general about internal political processes, yes, we have seen an increase recently, against the background, in particular, of these anti-semitic pogroms in dagestan, we also mentioned today the leader, there patrushev, was mentioned today as a person who could potentially embrace, let's say, take power into his own hands, we see the strengthening of certain persons, in particular the war criminal kadyrov , who has recently been in public space more and more often, he has not been so active for a long time, putin gives constant such passes in the direction of the muslim world, the formidable is defined as the cultural capital of russia in 2025, in moscow there will be the construction of the largest, almost in europe, mosque, kadyrov himself

is promoting. .. judge your son.