[000:00:00;00] to attract people to the army, how to do it, and not instead to talk about what, by the way , maryana bezumnytsia wrote when she started to tell what the general staff told them that they needed in order to release people from the front 20 000 people to replace them, and it's like, how come we can't do it without a plan, that's the plan, marianne, that's the plan, for you to run around there that you're developing ideas, how to release people from the front, so to release them, you have to send someone to the front, and it must be some people , so what is going on, you say, why instead of thinking about replacing people with the general staff, instead of looking for a way to rotate people at the front with the general staff, why are they starting to talk

about the war plan. i'm going to make a suggestion that, you know, some people might not like, but it seems to me that these conversations are happening because instead of tackling the hard, really hard things, the office of the president decided early on that they already know, won everything in the war, and we need to take care of the future elections, which will take place sometime later, or not later, right now, and in order to somehow win these elections, we need to nurture our electorate, and you know, from these words of arahamia and these pretensions, in the style of an uklanist, who tells how it is that we need to call someone, give us a plan, or we will not go anywhere to fight, so this gives the impression that the servant of the people,

the party, the servant of the people sees as his electorate... and those people , who do not participate in the defense of the state, and c this is the whole problem of the current political situation in the country, as long as the current government sees as its electoral base people who are very far from the war, and as long as it considers those people who are fighting for itself as a threat, they will produce such, you know, giving passports , russian... propaganda, and it is not the worst thing that they give passes to russian propaganda, the worst thing is that in this way they divide society instead of collapsing it in the struggle for victory, instead they try to preserve their electorate, that is, for as it turned out about these politicians, they don't really care about those people who are currently at the front, they don't really care about their rotation, they don't really

care about those who are already serving... it is very important for them to prevent the emergence of a new mobilization of people who have not yet contributed to the defense of the state , and they probably avoid this, and it is bad, because the logic of the ukranian should not be the logic of the current government, it should not be the logic of the ruling party, it is just some absolutely catastrophic situation, also, apart from this story, you know, it was not limited to herewith quoting politicians from the ruling party the servant of the people party with russian resources. another person who was quoted, and has been quoted by the russian media for three days, literally non-stop, is actually david arahamia, and his last interview, which he gave on november 24,

well, to the all-ukrainian channel 1.1. well, first of all, let's understand here in more detail, because there is simply a layering of a bunch of different, you know, strange statements, but first of all, what arachami did not say, but what the russian, well, propagandists are trying to attribute to him, so arakhamia did not say that ukraine was going to sign some agreements with someone, and that these agreements were not allowed to be signed by some external forces at the beginning of the war, and that ukraine directly sought to surrender, but arahamia definitely did not say this. moreover, he said that all the negotiations with russia actually rested on the fact that russia was not going to leave ukrainian, ukrainian territory, they were going to literally stand somewhere, that is, where they captured something, and then sign something there and so on , well, let's go, let's not

go, that was already the question, well, let 's see, first of all, what about this, well, he said arahamia, in words, they were ready for a lot of words, but we understood that everyone has something on each side. there is a game of its own, well, that is, this whole game directly depended on successes or defeats at the front, well, in words they said that’s it , we are going home to where, where you were, you are there one, two, three, four, five , accept, and that's all, and then in the details, that we will stand until you accept everything, well, actually, this quote itself, which was stretched by the russian media and which they began to comment on, let's also look at it, they really, really to almost to the last hoped that they would pressure us to sign such an agreement

so that we would accept neutrality, this was the biggest thing for them, so that they would be ready to end the war if we would accept, as finland once did, neutrality and give an undertaking that we we will not join nato, just one point. in fact, the key point was this, everything else is there, cosmetic, political seasonings, such as about denazification, the russian-speaking population and blah blah blah, why did ukraine not agree to this point, well, first of all, in order for this point to agree, we need to change the constitution, our path to nato is written in the constitution, secondly, there is no trust and there was not and there is no russians that they will do it. it could only be done if there were security guarantees, well, we couldn’t sign anything, leave, everyone would have exhaled there, and then they would come in better prepared, because they came in really unprepared for such resistance, so

we could only to work when there is a hundred percent certainty that it will not happen a second time, and there is no such certainty, moreover, when we returned from istanbul, boris johnson came to kyiv and said that we will not do anything with them at all. sign and let's just fight, well, actually, on the basis of these words, a wave of manipulations, you know, fabrications and conversations swept over arachami , well, let's also listen to them, from sochi , from sochi, our boy, that's the ego carried away, when sochinsky carries jehyt, he begins to cut the truth mat. and he told the truth, it turns out, всё это время, we were all right here, it turns out, putin spoke the truth, i was endlessly impressed that

everything that the russian propaganda lied about, as they told us, at some point, turned out to be pure truth, everything that was laughed at, also turned out to be really true, then when putin announced that it was johnson who broke the peace negotiations, caused a smile in the west, laughter in ukraine, then putin showed the document, but no one believed that either, now, when arachami explains step by step exactly how the peace negotiations broke down, it becomes clear that everything, that they arranged in buche, they arranged it themselves, they killed their own citizens, only in order to publicly explain to the world why... well, as you can see, arkhamia did not say anything about what happened in buche at all, well, in this context,

that's why that a riot is a riot, but what happened in istanbul is what happened in istanbul, these are different things, and a russian crime in a riot, a russian crime in a riot, but again, why i... that this is manipulation, because these words, for some reason, they did not give literally what was said in the next seconds of this interview, which completely refute this whole set of words of russian propagandists, and we will look at it, well, to see what was actually said, to what extent this process of belarus and istanbul was overseen by washington, london, warsaw. embarrassed, not managed in any way, but by agreement, that is, they understood, we had a group, a group of security advisers of these countries, our partners, was immediately created, but we gave them information dosed from the point of view of

the lag of a little bit of information, that is, so that it did not spill out you just saw that it was enough everything happened discretely, because we were just dosing, when arahamia says about, the information lag, which means that the allies could not even know that ukraine was negotiating something there and what specifically ukraine was talking about in istanbul, because they were simply receiving information later than it happened, this means, informational bullshit, but the main thing is the message that johnson came there and disrupted everything , it turns out that this is also not true, absolutely, and this is also, absolutely clearly saying, you could already sign these treasonous arrangements about the neutral status of ukraine, but

johnson came as a firefighter. and said to no house it was not like that at all, that is only said by people who want to twist any event there for political purposes, so that we can sign, look, neither i could sign it, nor any member members of the delegation, we don't even have the legal right to sign anything at all, that's right, that is , it could only theoretically happen if there was a meeting with zelsky putin, theoretically and sign something, then it would have to be ratified in the parliament that is, when people say that, they say it only to an unprepared reader or viewer or listener, that is, absolutely, you know, manipulations are like that, well, that is not surprising in principle, but i would like to say something a little different here, you understand , it's just this case that shows us how cautious ukrainian officials should be in saying something to the general public, and when they start...' about why we did that, why did we

do that, well, you have to weigh your words a little, well, because anything becomes as a result the subject of manipulation, if you suddenly think that this subject of manipulation and that's all the talk , russian propaganda will not bring it out, will not start circulating it in the international press, then you are mistaken, because it will be brought out, they will threaten it, and everyone, as i will now explain in detail what happened. what was said and what was not said is impossible, simply, so before you go out and tell something, well, you need to think at least a little about how your words will be interpreted, and not only these words, but also the following ones, for example, also one more, let's let's watch the episode, which just complements this picture from that interview, putin showed the document, and according to the result of the belarusian negotiations, to the african delegation, he... demonstrated it, where, as he claims,

the draft peace agreement with ukraine is written, and on the eh, this document was apparently signed in istanbul, this document was called: agreement on permanent neutrality of ukraine and security guarantees. putin said that there were 18 articles, er, and as he said, i will quote, everything is spelled out from combat equipment to personnel of the armed forces of ukraine. he said there was a signature. the head of the delegation, that's how putin claimed, why didn't he make this document public , you paid attention, what do you think, why, if he had the document, he would have made it public already, well, probably the document really didn't exist, but you you know, when this discussion was going on, these 18 points were known and even i also talked about them in my program and said then why it is impossible to agree to them at all, and here i have to say that if probably in this

interview, which is now quoted by the russian media actively, and who distort and manipulate, obviously, but if arahamia had not told in it that johnson had come, yes, but instead told that in these 18 points, for example, there were such as, that the russians, will inspect military bases on the territory of ukraine, troops, that ukraine should reduce the number of troops, that ukraine should not purchase western weapons. excuse me, then what kind of weapons should we buy at all, or should we remain unarmed, that among these 18 points there was also a point that ukraine should not conduct joint exercises with nato, then probably the result of this interview for information policy would be somewhat different than simply saying that all the russians wanted was for ukraine not to join nato, and of course, it is a very strange idea to speak like that to a person who has not been in politics for the first time... in politics, in principle, he, mr. rahamia

, has been among politicians for a long time, and he has been speaking publicly for a long time, he speaks well publicly, come on, and he could probably be more clear will express his opinion, and so it turns out, that literally all they want from us, it turns out, is not to join nato, no, it's not like that, it wasn't like that from the first, and it wasn't like that from the very beginning, they asked us to surrender, and unfortunately of this mr. raha. did not say, more so, instead of telling that putin cannot show the documents, he really cannot show them, he waves them from afar, what is written there, by whom, is not entirely clear. so, instead of all this , it was probably necessary to simply explain in more detail and speak more truthfully about who did what and who did not do what and why it was impossible to do, and you know it, it looks like maybe mr. arahamia

himself spoke about something recklessly at those negotiations, and now he is trying to explain to a wider circle, that it turns out, we can't sign all this nonsense just because of that... because it is written that way in our constitution, and if it was not written in the constitution that we could sign, it must be understood that way, well, it is obviously not true, well, perhaps we should talk about it, well, that is why such stories, well, actually summing up today's story, i can't complain a lot about the russian propagandists here, because what they say, they have been saying for a long time, they say it too , they lie, and this is not news to you, but yes, well, in this particular case, we would very much like , so that our politicians do not cause unnecessary discord and do not create situations that stir up society, that lead to incorrect conclusions that give fuel to russian propaganda. moreover, i

believe that in this situation, of course, perhaps mr. arahami should come out and explain once again what he meant and what he did not meant, but with another? because on the one hand, you know, in order for there not to be these conversations about the fact that there is a conflict, that zelensky wants to remove the tyrant, it is probably time for zelensky himself to speak up and say something like that, on the other hand, if the same deputy from servants of the people are saying some absolutely crazy things , so that no one thinks that zelenskyi is the initiator of these actions, he should use his influence and force various...' rumors to stop stirring up strife in ukraine, well, to deprive maryana of the deputy the mandate is impossible, because she was elected from a majority district, but the servant of the people faction can definitely deprive her of her position in the committee, so that she stops interfering in security politics, and so that this unbalanced

person cannot breed all these things around it, after all, the servant of the people faction remains simple option: to deprive... marianne bezuglu just, well, the possibility of being a faction, and depending on whether the faction does that, we'll see who's really bringing discord into society, because they have to do it, to take all the eyes off, you know, conversations, thank you. wivinil agency presents: december 3, 18:00, fest republily invites you to a fabulous concert by solomiya chchubai, lullabies for oleksa. time to believe in miracles. jalapita band, rococo. school of arts of the free and indifferent. a concert

of light and goodness on nicholas day for children with love. december 3, 6:00 p.m. festreblik ticket equals charity, live sound. big broadcast of vasyl zima, my name is vasyl zima, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important thing, two hours to learn about the war, joins serhii izgurets of our broadcast, the military results of the day, and how the world lives , what is there in the world, for two hours to be aware of economic news, i will give the floor to oleksandr morchyvka, he will talk about the economy during the war, and sports news, yevhen pasukhov is ready to speak about sports, two hours in the company of her favorite presenters, about culture during the war, lina chisheni is ready to talk about the presenters, that many have become so-called, maybe the weather will at least give us

some optimism, mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, as well as distinguished guests studio, we will have volodymyr ogryzko today, if all goes well, events of the day: in two hours. vasyl winter's big broadcast. a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. watch judicial control with tatyana shustrova this week in the program. reform of the constitutional court. who is running for office? oksana blazhivska acted as a representative of this unscrupulous judicial corporation. but why didn't the previous conclusions of the state security council be stopped. oleksandr prokopenko, he has a negative opinion from the public integrity council. congratulations, judicial control is on the air. the judicial system of ukraine needs thorough reboot. this is one of the requirements of our accession to the european union. soon , ukraine will begin selection for one of

the country's most important judges - the constitutional court. the selection conditions are strict, and even in spite of this, unscrupulous servants of themis are trying to get into the body that interprets the main state document and decides on the conformity of the ukrainian legislation with the constitution. why judges of dubious reputation. rush to positions, about it and let's talk today, but first to the news. last week, the higher qualification commission of judges began the qualification evaluation of the current servants of themis for their suitability for the positions they hold and has already made the first decisions about the impossibility of judges to administer justice. the judge of the donetsk district administrative court, olena galatina, did not pass the assessment. in 2019, the previous composition of the vkks recognized it. that corresponds to the position, despite a negative conclusion from the public integrity council. judge for four years

managed not to declare her home, and also forgot to declare the car she bought, and the most interesting thing: in 2016, a ukrainian judge repeatedly went to russian-occupied donetsk, allegedly to pick up things. moreover, she made court decisions from there. i was at work in the first half of the day, and then i left. however, the mother council of integrity and the higher qualification commission found inconsistency with these words. therefore, judge galatina did not confirm the ability to administer justice. for her release, this conclusion must be confirmed by the supreme council of justice. another a judge convicted of bribery mobilized to the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine. so now the hearing of his case has been stopped. oleksandr lysyuk, the former head of the baryshiv district court of the kyiv region, joined the army. at the end of march, the highest anti-corruption court of ukraine. sentenced to three years of imprisonment with confiscation of all property and deprivation of the right to hold positions in state authorities. according to the case file, the judge

received $25 in 2017. the first part of the bribe for making a decision in civil cases in the interests of third parties. in general, the judge demanded uah 5,000 for a positive decision. oleksandr lysyuk filed an appeal against the verdict, and now he decided to go to the armed forces. so the case is stopped. that among the judges convicted and detained for corruption, the practice of mobilization to the army has recently gained considerable momentum, so the ministers of themis, who skillfully possess legislation and an understanding of the judicial process, use all the loopholes in the legislation, mobilize to the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine and stop judicial proceedings against themselves , avoiding punishment. soon it will start in ukraine selection to one of the most important judicial bodies of the constitutional court. previously, judges of the constitutional court of ukraine were appointed by the president, the parliament and the congress of judges. according to

the constitution, selection takes place on a competitive basis. however, in reality, the procedure did not involve a real competition, since each subject of appointment separately held its own formal competitions, which did not in any way ensure the verification of candidates for compliance with the requirements of the constitution. therefore , the risk of political influence on the court was enormous. at the end of last year, verkhovna. council adopted the law on changing the process of selection of judges of the constitutional court of ukraine. the law creates an advisory group of experts, its composition will include six members: one each from the verkhovna rada, the president and the congress of judges of ukraine, one person from the venice commission and two persons delegated by international organizations that provide assistance to ukraine in reforms of the rule of law. the advisory group must analyze each candidate for compliance with the criteria of integrity and professional competence. and this is a good group

experts, it has to filter candidates, so to speak, and already from the filtered candidates , both the president, and judges, and the verkhovna rada will already choose their own, for their quota, whom they will appoint as judges of the constitutional court, and although the new conditions of selection for the position judges of the constitutional court are tough and transparent, especially the desperate unscrupulous servants of themis do not lose. hopes of climbing into a high chair. this is oksana blazhivska, a former member of the supreme council of justice. she had a rapid career, which by a strange coincidence circumstances coincided precisely with the appointment to a high position of her father, yevgeny blazhivskyi. as soon as he became the deputy of former prosecutor general viktor pshonka, president yanukovych appointed blazhivska as a judge of the commercial court of kyiv. before that, she worked as a lawyer and a notary. there are already people who have proven themselves, let's say, in other positions and we know about them, well , there was one before that, in particular ms. oksana blazhivska, who was a member of the supreme council

of justice until recently, who is in this position... and completely factually acted as a representative of the unscrupulous of this judicial corporation, maintained the status quo as far as possible. the blazhivskyi family has considerable wealth, a real palace in the village of dmytrivtsi near kyiv. blazhivska assures that he inherited it from his grandmother. my mother inherited, construction began in 2002 with a summer kitchen, two garages, 1200 combined. and the house itself is a one-story building. three, 300. earlier , blazhivska also declared an apartment with an area of ​​110 square meters in kyiv, registered to her underage daughter solomiya. the judge also has a lot of precious jewelry, their value can reach more than million hryvnias. despite her dubious biography and even more dubious fortune, in 2019, president volodymyr zelenskyy appointed oksana

blazhivska as a member of the supreme council of justice, where she is. proved herself as an active defender of unscrupulous judges, the most famous case of judge kostyantyn babenka, who in december 2019 was caught driving drunk out of mind blazhivska delayed the consideration of the complaint the judge who dishonored the judge's mantle for more than a year, the disciplinary chamber of the russian federation recommended the dismissal of judge babenko only in march of this year. somehow, by the way, the ethical council, which checked the members of the supreme council of justice, did not leave, did not find major problems in this, and left her in her position to earn, let's say, this term, this is, by the way, an unnecessary example once again that this the ethical council, which was formed according to the same principle, where there are three internationalists, three ukrainians

delegated by the judiciary, well, not always and not works very well. the judge of the great chamber of the supreme court of ukraine oleksandr prokopenko also wants to go to the constitutional court, despite the negative conclusion of the public council of integrity and questionable property, some of them also, for example, have negative conclusions of the public council of integrity, if we are talking about oleksandr prokopenko, and the judge of the supreme court, he applied to the supreme court, then he had, or rather has a negative opinion from the public. the council of integrity, which concerned both property and, well, some of it solutions according to experts, prokopenko probably appropriated official housing, an apartment almost 130 km away, privatized it for his mother, and also substantially and most likely deliberately understated the value of the property in the declaration. for example, he indicated that in 2014 he successfully purchased a lexus for only $10,000, which is

three times less than the market value of the car. in 2020, the plenum of the supreme court issued a public statement condemning the actions of the odious head of kyiv's most scandalous district administrative court, pavlo vovka, and judges who participated in illegal schemes, as undermining the authority of the judiciary. this statement was supported by all judges of the supreme court, except for three, including oleksandr prokopenko. evidently, he did not consider the actions of the oascu judges to be dishonorable. mantle, the fate of several key reforms depends on the constitutional court right now, in particular, the further implementation of the reform of the supreme council of justice, the reform of the land market, and others. after the end of the war, the constitutional court will consider the complex issues of reintegration of the occupied territories. so we hope not to the unworthy judges will be able to occupy high positions. and for

today i have everything, it was a court order. and i, tatyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report a judge's abuse of his authority or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the email address you see on your screens. all the best and we will meet in exactly one week. you are watching the ukrainian voice of america program chas time, i'm natalya leonova, congratulations. an aid package for ukraine and israel is critically needed and requires the fastest possible response