above and the ukrainian language of the free russian military ship, i propose to lay down the weapons and surrender, russian military ship, and gloriously. they will fight in the light of fate, our little girls will throw the whole cross in the sun, i will dominate, on my

side, soul and body, we will put our words to rest and show when the brothers are prose. there is a war going on, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds, we are engaged in propaganda, russia is throwing millions of oil dollars to turn ukrainians into little russians. ukraine will become russia. let's counter the information attacks of the russians in the chronicle project informative. on monday, tuesday, thursday,

at 17:15 on the espresso channel. see this week in the collaborators program. convicted traitors, which of the fanatics of the kremlin are already behind bars? i would not say anything like that on ukrainian television. but how the ukrainian fomid punishes the adapted for serving the occupiers. only russia, the russian federation came to the rescue. on tuesday , november 28, at 5:45 p.m., the collaborators program with olena kononenko on the espresso tv channel. hello, this is svoboda ranok information project radio svoboda. top guests every day. this is the shipping district, kherson. inclusion of profits.

we are somewhere in the vicinity of bakhmut, we tell the main thing, on weekdays at 9:00 a.m., a big broadcast by vasyl zima, my name is vasyl zima, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important thing, two hours to learn about the war, serhiy izgurets joins our broadcast, the military results of the day, and how the world lives, what is happening in the world , will be told by yuliy fizel. two hours to keep abreast of economic news, i say oleksandr morchivtsa, he will talk about the economy during the war and sports news. evgeny pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters. lina cheschenina is ready to talk about culture during the war. presenters who have become like relatives to many. maybe the weather will at least give us some optimism. mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us. and also distinguished guests of the studio. we will have volodymyr ogrysko today, if all goes well. events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project

for smart and caring people. in the evening on espresso. verdict with serhii rudenko, from now on in a new two -hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics , even more top guests: foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion on the bad day with a phone survey. switch on and switch on, verdict with serhii rudenko every weekday from 20 to 22 at espresso. attention, friends, urgent collection. espresso tv channel asks to join the urgent collection for a car truck for the first separate special purpose brigade named after ivan bohun. artillery reconnaissance. artillery eyes, they need a new car. our defenders are in a zone of active hostilities and recently spent a lot. a very successful

operation, but the enemy destroyed their suv, so it is important to send them a new one as soon as possible. a car at the front, especially in the winter for our soldiers, is everything, without it, fighting is much more difficult, let's help, collect funds and buy a car for our defenders. the car has already been found, it remains to buy it. cars at the front are consumables, they are constantly being destroyed, so donate and help our armed forces, support our gathering together to victory. uah 45,000 is the cost of the car, uah 4,500 is the amount that needs to be collected.

the shelter is in bad condition, where to go , check the shelter yourself , the instructions from the ozone public monitoring group will help with this, download it, check the shelter and pass the information to the representatives of the state administration in your area. they will convey the remarks to the person responsible for the condition of the shelter, the balance to the recipient and will monitor the execution of such works. everyone has the right to try safely. congratulations, danilov, the secretary of the national security council, gave an interview to the foreign press the other day, where he said that russia will now act to activate all its agents, in order, well, including in the authorities, in order to tell that there is

a split between zelenskyi and zaluzhny, well, you know, from the reaction that russian... propagandists are currently having, one might get the impression that danilov was speaking directly about the deputy from the people's servants, maryana bezuglu. valery zaluzhny, head of the ukrainian armed forces, does not have a war plan for 2024, after which he must retire. this was stated by the deputy head of the committee of the verkhovna rada on national security and defense, nardepka, a servant of the people. bezuglaya referred to some, as she put it, non-public discussion with the military, from which it became clear that zaluzhny does not know how to fight in the twenty-fourth year. at the same time, the head of the nsdo, danilov, said that a split between zaluzhny and zelensky had occurred

because of russian spies. in an interview with the times, he spoke about a network of agents embedded by moscow in the ukrainian government. we were assured. there is no conflict between zelsky and zaluzhny, now they themselves confirm the existence of this conflict, it is simply impossible to deny it. and you know, it is really very difficult to deny that there is no conflict when people close to the president's office are constantly generating it, but i will still say that there really is no conflict, because it takes two for a conflict, we do not see any such conflict actions. we see some strange statements and some kind of strange information-policy on the part of only one wing, on the part of people close to the president's office, including maryan bezugla, are they some kind of straight, i don't know , icebreaker or what, who constantly writes something,

in particular, she is this actually wrote this post on the social network on facebook, where she began to tell that she was not given any plan, and since they did not give her any plan for 24... they did not tell her for a year, then it means that the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine has to resign, this, you know, is quite very a strange statement, of course, but... i wouldn't say that here we are dealing with one , well, not very adequate person, it would be exactly such a story, if a few days before this post, on the topic of the plan, davyd arakhamia, who in principle is one of the leaders of the servant of the people faction and a person even closer to the president's office, also began to tell, come on, he said verbatim: that's it, let's talk about it a little, because you know, there is no other topic right now at

russian propagandists than discussing the statements of these two people, bezugglai and arahamia, and until we understand what was said and what was not said, we cannot also, well , somehow understand who exactly instigates this informational, actual operation. the third issue that is very hot in the committee, how many more people are mobilized, is the mob resource, it is known, if rotation is done, it is necessary to mobilize another half of the people in the country, if not, then they suffer, what to do with it , whatever a long plan, or at least a short one, for a year, give some vision, the military leadership, they say, give a vision, a vision there is no vision, we just live as we used to live. and we are not satisfied with this, if we take the war plan now, by the way, we have been waiting for it in the committee

for a long time, they say, look, well, we are not military, we are public control, democratic control, what should be a war plan, you general the headquarters has to make a plan, well, i don’t know, i’m busy, i whispered, everyone’s there, the warlord, i’m not talking about personal matters, i’m talking about the institutions , yes, the institution says, i want to fight next year , yes, i need so many people, so many people i have to let go , because they already are they are fighting so much that they can’t, so let’s go, and i need so much money , and you don’t have this plan, and no one has such a plan, well , in fact, there is a plan, and he made it public, when he wrote an article about which we discussed earlier has already been told, where he clearly said that the war in the form it currently exists will continue, well, in such a rather complicated state, until there is some , well, cardinal solution of some or larger supplies of weapons or some orientation towards some

new technologies or something else, but what do we see when these conversations about the war plan, well, first of all, there is not one war plan, there are several of them, and i am sure that in fact the general staff submitted everything to it, and everyone knows about it, who is involved in it, if the deputies do not know it, well, maybe they do not have access to state secrets. at this level, to tell them this, because not too long ago, let me remind you, one of the deputies was accused in the state council, this is mr. nekta dubinsky oleksandr, who is a deputy from the faction of the ruling faction of the servant of the people, before that several other deputies were also from this one the same factions accused each other of the same treason, and is it possible for the general staff to do something special in such a case. to tell a lot to the deputies, who have a faction, well, as it turns out, a bunch

of traitors, simply, who can pass information to the russians, well, probably not, that's probably why all the talk about the plan, they are about something other than the plan itself, the idea and so on further, and in principle, in fact, arahamiya said about it, what he meant, he began to talk about what we have in order to release those people, who have been fighting for half a year, we have to call up the same number, and what is so strange and unexpected about this, excuse me, word, well, that's right, that's exactly how it is, in order to let someone go on rotation, someone must be called up, and from here we see some strange reluctance, both from the president's office, and as it turned out from arahamiya himself, to talk about how we should replace... those people and at least let them go a little bit, who are already fighting, and we also see that instead

of carrying out an information policy in the country about what should really be fought, well there is a larger circle of people than the 10% who are fighting, and who should be tangential to the war, more than a few people, if we really want to win, and not just wait for some, you know, miracle, that victory will come by itself, that you can believe in the armed forces, and somehow this faith will save everyone, so if we are going to make an effort, then we should talk about it, how to attract new people to the army, how to do it, and not instead talk about what, what the hell things were written by mariana the madwoman when she began to tell that the general staff said that in order to release people from the front, they need 20,000 people to replace them, and they say, how come we can't do it without a plan, this is a plan,

marianne, this is a plan, for that you are running around talking about what, uh, you are developing ideas on how to release people from the front, so in order to release them, it is necessary to send someone to the front, and it must be some people, so what is happening, you say, why instead of thinking about replacing people together with the general staff, instead of together with the general staff is looking for a way to rotate people at the front, why are they starting to talk about the war plan, i will express my opinion. an assumption that might, you know, be uncomfortable for some people, but it seems to me that these conversations are happening precisely because instead of tackling the hard, really hard tasks, the president's office decided early on that they've already, you know, won everything on war, and we must take care of the future elections, which

will take place sometime later, or not later, right now, and in order to somehow win these elections, we must nurture our electorate. and you know, from these words of arahamia and these pretensions, blunt in the style of an uklanist who tells how it is that we need to call someone, give us a plan, or we will not go anywhere to fight, so from this we get the impression that our by the electorate, the servant of the people, the party, the servant of the people, sees ukrainians and those people who do not participate in the defense of the state, and this is the whole problem of the current political situation in the country, as long as the current government will see its electoral base as people who are very far away from war, and as long as it will consider those

people who fight for themselves as a threat , they will breed like, you know, give passes to russian propaganda, and it's not the worst that they give passes to russian propaganda, the worst is that in this way they divide society instead of collapsing it in the struggle for victory, instead they are trying to preserve their electorate, that is, as it turned out for these politicians, they are not very concerned about those people who are now at the front, not very concerned about their rotation, not very concerned about those who are already serving, it is very important for them... to prevent a new mobilization of people who have not yet contributed to the defense of the state, and probably avoid it, and this is bad, because the logic of a partisan should not be the logic of the current government, it should not be the logic of the ruling party , this is just some absolutely catastrophic

situation. also, apart from this story, you know, not about not, not... the quoting of politicians from the ruling servant of the people party by russian resources was limited to this. another person who has been quoted for three days already, literally not ceasing to quote the russian media, this is actually david rahamia and his last interview, which he gave on november 24. well, the all-ukrainian channel 1.1. well, first of all, let's understand here in more detail, because there is simply a layering of a bunch of different, you know , strange statements, but first of all, what arachami did not say, but what the russian, well, propagandists are trying to attribute to him, so arakhamia did not say

that ukraine was going to sign any agreements with someone, and that these agreements were prevented from being signed by some external forces at the beginning of the war and that ukraine directly sought to surrender, but arakhamia did not say this for sure, moreover, he said that all the negotiations with russia actually rested on the fact that russia was not going to leave ukrainian, from ukrainian territory, they were going to literally stand somewhere, where they captured something, and then sign something there and yes, well, let's go, we won't go, that was already the question, well, let's see. the first thing, arahamiya said, they were ready for words, but we understood that everyone, each side has its own game. well, that is, this whole game directly depended on successes or defeats at the front, well, that is, in words, they said that's it, let's go home to

where, where you were, you are there 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, accept, and that's it , and then in the details, that we will wait until you accept everything, well, actually, this very quote, which the russian media stretched and which they began to comment on. let's also look at it, they really, really until almost the last, hoped that they would pressure us to sign such an agreement, so that we would accept neutrality, this was the most important thing for them, so that he, they were ready to end the war, if we take, like finland, once there, neutrality, give a commitment that we will not join nato, only one point, well, actually key. there was this point, everything else was there, cosmetic, political seasonings, such as about denazification , the russian-speaking population and blah blah blah, why

did ukraine not agree to this point, well, first of all, in order to agree to this point, it is necessary to change the constitution, our path to nato is written in the constitution, secondly, there is no trust and there was not and there is no russians that they will do it, it was possible only if there are security guarantees, well, we couldn't sign something, leave, everyone would have exhaled there, and then they would come in more prepared, because they came in really not prepared for such resistance, so we could only work when there is one hundred percent certainty that this will not happen again, and there is no such certainty, moreover, when we returned from istanbul, boris johnson came to kyiv and said that we will not sign anything with them at all. and let's just fight, well, actually, let's go

on the basis of these words of arkhamia, a wave of manipulations, you know, fabrications and conversations, well, let’s also listen to them, from sochi, from sochi, our pyrinok, this is what swept him away when carrying sochi dzhegita, he begins to cut the truth of the womb, and he said : the truth, it turns out, all this time, we were all right here, it turns out, putin was telling the truth, i was endlessly impressed that everything that the russian propaganda lied about, as they told us, at some point turned out to be the pure truth, everything over chem laughed, too, it turned out it's true, when putin said that it was johnson who disrupted the peace talks, it caused a smile in... the west, laughter in ukraine, then putin showed the document, but no one believed it then either, now, when arachami, in essence, step by step

explains exactly how the peace negotiations broke down, it becomes clear that everything they arranged in buch, they arranged themselves, they killed their own citizens, only in order to publicly explain to the world why they knew nothing about what was happening in buch, arkhamia did not speak at all, well, in this context, because bucha is bucha, but what happened in istanbul is what happened in istanbul, these are different things, and a russian crime in bucha is a russian crime in bucha, but again , why do i say that this is manipulation, the words, for some reason they did not give literally what was said in the next seconds of this interview, which completely refute this whole set of words

of russian propagandists, and we will look at it, well, to see that in fact , it was said that to what extent this process, belarus and istanbul was overseen by washington, london, warsaw, not managed in any way. not managed in any way, but by agreement , that is, they understood, we had a group, a group of security advisers of these countries, our partners, was immediately created, but we gave them information in doses from the point of view of the lag of a little bit of information, that is, so that it did not just spill out you saw that everything happened quite discretely, because we were just dosing when arahamia says about the information lag. this means that the allies might not even know that ukraine is agreeing on something there and what exactly ukraine is about speak in istanbul, because they just received.

information later than it was happening, that means it's a piece of information, but the main thing is the message that johnson came there and disrupted everything , it turns out that this is also not true, absolutely, and this is also, absolutely clearly said arahamiya, you could already sign these treasonous agreements about the neutral status of ukraine, but as a firefighter, johnson came and said: there were no houses there at all, everything was not like that , only people who want to twist any event there for political purposes say this, for that we could sign, look, neither i could sign it, nor any member of the delegation, we don't even have the legal right to sign anything at all, right, that is, it could only theoretically happen if there was a meeting between zelensky and putin , theoretically and sign something, then it would have to be ratified in the parliament

, i.e.... when people say that, they only say it to an unprepared reader or viewer or listener, well, that is, absolutely, you know, manipulations are such, well, what in principle and not it is strange, but i would like to say something else here, you understand, it is just this case that shows us how cautious ukrainian officials should be in saying something to the general public, and when they start to think about... why we did this, why did so, well, you have to weigh your words a little, well, because anything as a result becomes the subject of manipulation, if you suddenly think that this subject of manipulation and that's all the talk, russian propaganda will not take it outside, it will not begin to be replicated in the international press , then you are wrong because it will be brought out, they will reproduce it, and everyone, like me, will now explain in detail what was said and what was not.

it is said, it is impossible, simply, so before you go out and tell something, well, you need to think at least a little about how your words will be interpreted, and not only these words, but also the following ones, for example, also one more, let's watch an episode, which simply complements this picture from that interview, putin showed the document, and according to the result of the belarusian negotiations, to the african delegation, he demonstrated it, where, as he claims, a draft peace agreement with ukraine was written, and this document was apparently initialed in istanbul, this document was called the agreement on the permanent neutrality of ukraine and security guarantees, putin said that there were 18 articles, eh, and as he said, i will quote, everything is spelled out , from military equipment to the personnel of the armed forces of ukraine, and he said that

the signature of the head of the delegation is there. so putin claimed, why didn't he make this document public, you drew attention, what do you think, why, if he had the document, it would have been made public by now, well, for sure that document really did not exist, but you know, when this discussion was going on, these 18 points were known, and even i also talked about them in my program and said then why it is impossible to agree to them at all , and here i have to say that if probably in this interview, which is now... the russian media are active and are distorting and manipulating, obviously, but if arahamia had not talked about the fact that johnson had come, yes, but instead , he said that in these 18 points, for example, there were such things as that the russians would to inspect the military bases on the territory of ukraine, the troops, that ukraine should reduce the number of troops, that ukraine should not purchase western weapons, excuse me, what kind of

weapons should we buy in general, that we should remain unarmed, that among these 18 points there was also the point that ukraine should not conduct joint exercises with nato, then probably the result of this interview for information policy would be somewhat different than simply saying that all the russians wanted was for ukraine not to join nato , and of course this is a very strange idea yes to speak to a person who is not the first day in politics, in principle, mr. rarahami has been among politicians for a long time and he has been speaking publicly for a long time, speak publicly, let's go and he could probably express his opinion more clearly, and so it turns out that literally everything that they want us, it turns out not to join nato, no, it's not like that, it wasn't like that from the first, and it's not like that from the very beginning...