time, we will go, we will go, we will go to victory in spite of everything, the ukrainian language of the free. rules of a warm country: healthy care. thank you for gaining energy by walking. you damage the elevator and restore health. let's beat the winter together. ship, i suggest you lay down your weapons and surrender.

like dew on the sun, satanuim, and we are brothers on our side, soul body.

greetings, russian propagandists these days have two topics that cause joy, one is somewhat strange, namely, it is surprising how along komsomolsk with a fire russian propagandists report about the bad weather that has hit the south now, and this it is even disgusting when propaganda is so afraid to inform the russian people about something alarming that even in extreme weather phenomena they look for positive ones, but look at this positive idiocy, the storm of the century, брошился сегодня на юг россии, the number of deaths from natural disasters in the kuban in the crimea has increased to four , the prosecutor's office of the krasnodar region reported. approximately 1,200,000 people remain without electricity. krym and sevastopol took the main blow, the wind gust reached 40 m per second, even more in the mountains. this video became viral crimean squirrel clings desperately to a branch.

trying to cope with the wind, the video, as they say, is funny, the situation is terrible, the aquarium museum in sevastopol was flooded , as a result of which a thermal shock occurred, approximately 800 rare marine animals died, the monument to andrew the first-called on the sevastopol embankment that survived the storm looks even more miraculous everything is washed away, everything is destroyed by water with huge boulders, embankment... well, somehow it is very russian, you know, to rejoice and consider suffering funny animals, and at the same time to be happy that another statue of them has been established, well, that’s it, they always valued their statues more than any living creatures, well, but what’s even more interesting is what subconscious

comparisons come out of them and you now you will see that he was not the only one who came up with something there, but they came up with such a method, it can be compared to the storm during the crimean war of 1854, when dozens of turkish, french and english ships were sunk. a storm of such force has never been observed in all time, but the only such one i managed to meet a historical analogy today, during the crimean war, in the fifty-sixth year there was the same terrible storm that hit the crimea and during the storm more than thirty ships were sunk. sardinia took part in this intervention there, well, in total, more than 30 ships intervened under...

the subconscious of the propagandists suggests interesting things, because the comparison is very telling. 30 ships of the russian invaders have not sunk yet, as far as i know, it is known that one of them broke into half and three vessels collided with each other, which were previously not seen as transporting stolen ukrainian grain, and a line of russian fortifications built with chalk in the crimea, we hope that there will be other losses in the russian troops and their infrastructure, and about the crimean war, it is also interesting, the crimean war ended with the defeat of the russian empire and the signing of the peace of paris in 1856, he deprived russia of the right to have not only a military fleet on the black sea, but also deprived of fortresses and coastal arsenals, so such comparisons are not only positive, but also indicate that russian propagandists are fully

aware of their future fate. so far, let's put it this way, they have nothing to be particularly proud of at the fronts, although it is clear that the situation there is difficult and tense, both for us and for them, but... but to say that there are direct reasons for joy, there is none, after all no, well, let's see, i'm always there, when such almost bravura relations start, that's all ukraine, they fall apart, i'm always there i am very wary, that is, here you always have to keep yourself in your hands, especially since the collapse of the front is not yet visible, and there is some very neat, let's say, progress, but the collapse of the front from the side of ukraine is not yet observed, yes, vladimirovich, i completely agree with you, now until the end of the year, with arms and equipment, they will still have resources, and no one has completed mobilization activities, their resources are quite large,

but nevertheless, the period of revelation, which is now coming for political leaders as well on ukraine, and nato officials, says that the situation in ukraine is quite difficult. and this is what is happening in ukraine, this is, as they say, some kind of political frankness, as you can see, they are not connected with the situation, the objective situation at the front, which is no less difficult than it has been all these years and a half , there were no easy situations during these one and a half years, i must say it directly, but it is connected with the internal things that are happening in ukraine, about which i already told yesterday, today we will continue, which frankly please russian propaganda. zaluzhny, the head of the ukrainian armed forces, must now also be cautious . kiev spiders seem to have started a new flock. maryana bezuglaya, deputy deputy of the people's people, who does not do anything without personal consultation with ermak and zelensky, called on the glavkom to resign. it is curious

that earlier official kiev in principle refuted the split between the president and head of state, but as you can see, there is. and of course, this is the grand prix of this festival of sincerity. the masters of arachama, but the leader of the faction of the servants of zelsky, and their joy is so great that they even expect that in the near future, something will happen to them that directly inspires them. regarding the processes that take place inside ukraine, they are, well, every day, it seems to me, that the speed of change in public opinion and in the degree of public rhetoric is simply accelerating, well , i don’t know, hardly by an order of magnitude, but at times, a day these days, in the next week, i think, we will see a lot of incredible, a lot of strange things, a lot of things that even in the summer

it was impossible for neither us nor our opponents to believe, the orchestra is thundering, here we are close to catharsis. or the khokhlys are close to catharsis, i don’t know who will have catharsis first, and that’s why we are forced to talk about the internal situation, because now it is not so much the russians who influence it as our internal, some things, let’s talk about that with political scientist vitaly kulyk, director of the center for research and problems of civil society, we will talk precisely for this purpose, so that you know, catharsis has come to the russians after all. vitaly, congratulations, and well, let's just start with the main thing, but what prompted your opinion, these eyes suddenly really strange statements, both on the part of maryana beznoglu and on the part of arachami, who were, well

, let's say there, yesterday we analyzed it in great detail, there it was not so much what he said, how much he was interpreted, but even the fact that he said, it was said carelessly, to say the least. why is this internal , you know, strange turbulence happening now? well, it is obvious that after the articles and statements that flowed. there should have been some clarity from the military leadership as well as from the political leadership, at least the next step, if we talk about the fact that at the front we we are observing a certain pause, we are talking about getting involved in a positional war, on the one hand, on the other hand, we hear from the bankers that it is not worth going into politics in the military leadership, that is, these statements of the banker... are perceived as certain political

statements, and therefore we see an aggravation, well, not a contradiction, but a divergence in the directions of the political process, perhaps the banks overestimate or somehow paint a picture for themselves that here we are entering a decline, a decrease in the intensity of the war, which means a certain thawing of the political process , although... at the bank itself, they constantly emphasize that there will be no elections, that elections are not held during the war and similar things, but the tail has been wagging the dog for a long time, and we are already directly hearing and seeing that an electoral, one-time law is being prepared on the post-war, or elections during the war, as they are called, on the impossibility of the law on the impossibility of holding elections in the occupied territories, which must be according to the law passed before the elections themselves, we see working groups being assembled, how

backoffices are being created, how mobilization is taking place political technologists to participate in the meddling headquarters, but so far everything is at such a low start, but not launched in the process, that is , by and large, the decision that there will be elections, it is at the level of such a feeling in the political class, rather than an already recognized fact. but this feeling, it creates nervousness, certain political fears are given as signs, the main actors, the forces that are ready to compete for power now, understand that it is impossible, not to go into a false start, but you cannot fall behind, and they are trying to throw such trials pebbles, how will society perceive those or other possible solutions, certain actions.

this is roughly how i see the statements of the bank when evaluating zavruzhny’s article, as well as some of the statements of individual political figures from various political forces. somewhere there is a smell of these elections, of this rebirth of the political process . they will go to the elections. regarding her blunt statement about zaluzhnyi's resignation, well, apparently everyone has already spoken, and even the representatives of the office and the people's servants in the crowd declared their tiredness from ms. bezovleyu and that sometimes her statements can be read. opinions in high offices, but sometimes they can go ahead of the expressed, request or

expressed position, it runs far ahead of what was wanted to speed up or vice versa, to reduce the pace, but of course, this is a good feature for propaganda, now it is the russian language that is being used as much as possible... ganda is repulsed by just a mass ipso, now these statements are circulating all over the networks, indicating that tomorrow will be the resignation of the head of the central committee, that the decision has already been made and bezugla was the first to voice this desire, that these are the opinions that are on banking in the first office, in fact it may not be, it may be the position of some players on banking who would like to speed up, or... this is the position of the most blunt person who expressed an opinion that echoes on the sidelines , she wanted to serve someone in this way, i.e

while i would not exaggerate the fault lines between the bank and the military leadership, this is, firstly, secondly, there have already been cases when the alleged conflict between the president and the military could be interpreted as inevitable, that it has already deepened so much that only the managerial the decision was resignation, no, they turned the page, came to some sort of understanding, and the work... constructively continued. this time, the ball is now on the big bank account and they have to react to it, or they say, then they confirm the words of the bezgul and say that there is questions to the employee and they demand, for example, a personnel decision, or vice versa, they do not demand a personnel decision, but demand some kind of document, some certainty in the plans and in the questions that the bezuval asks, because, frankly, some questions are quite valid, they do not sound like only among the deputies of the verkhovna rada, but this is civil society, experts ask this question

before the military leaders, so it is also worth considering that it is not all nonsense that our people's deputies sometimes do, although sometimes it seems so, and that is why i would not have committed a huge betrayal and catastrophe without it, i see here that now interpretations are involved to a large extent, and by and large it is already becoming difficult for the russian pso to distinguish the difference between interpretations, that is why the government, or rather the political leadership should first of all dissolve... the emphasis should be either an interview or some kind of statement from the president, the head of the administration or the leading members of the president's team, who would lay out the situation from a to z, put all the accents and explain no matter what further steps are taken, the situation cannot be escalated, because this creates a window of opportunity

for russian propaganda to split ukrainian society and the political class, well, as for me, if there is any... fatigue from the endless, then it is probably the easiest to get rid of it simply because removing her from the national security committee and introducing her, for example, to the health care committee, it will be in her specialty in the end, she is a doctor, psychologically, and she was finally where she should be and i could finally do something professional, but here is another interesting thing, you already mentioned the words of zelensky, where he interprets the general participation of the military in 2014. in politics, in izasan's article, we even have, it seems, a graph on this matter , he writes there that various political forces are pushing the military into politics, it was after 2014, when every political party wanted some military stars of war, and i believe that it was a very big mistake, they were pushed into politics, because they were all destroyed,

their reputation was destroyed, well, etc., the main thing is that he said that it was a mistake directly and that very strange words, because in the faction itself, the servant of the people and in their party, there are also people who were in the military in 2014, now it is wonderful, for example, deputy yehor cherniv, i consider one of the most worthy, really deputies in this verkhovna rada , who is now doing a lot of positive things and to say that his entry into politics was a mistake , well, you know, it is a little inadequate to the situation, and on the other hand, what is the problem for zelenskyi with the entry of the military into politics, well, on the contrary, he should would even welcome them in himself in the party, why, why is he so afraid of the military, after all? well, first of all, i would, no, really, i don't really think that the use

of the military in politics is a normal phenomenon. because we hear ideas about the creation of a party of the military, the political power of the military, the demand for a strong hand is born from here, stories about the fact that the military in politics gave more discipline, introduced a new quality, in fact no, really the arrival of the military after the 14th year, only some of them, well, were able to realize themselves as politicians, while others were not to a large account more as frontmen who voiced certain political positions, trying to reach the military environment, or surfing on the trust of the army, which was formed after the 14th year, and on the other hand, i understand the logic of the bank, because in speaking of the fact that the military has discredited itself in politics, and by summarizing all this, they thus hint or convey

a message to the same glaucum and some other generals who... already see themselves or can see themselves in politics and whom the banking considers, well, if not competitors, then they see certain challenges for themselves from there, because the mood in society is far from the 14th year, and the support of the armed forces is at the level of 90% or more, if not 98, then it is obvious that in the eyes the bank this support of the armed forces, it is translated into a possible rating of politicians, military politicians, but in the electoral process, in the electoral process... there are no arithmetical rules, there is no automatic translation of the rating of the armed forces, the level of support by citizens of their army, to specific

military personnel who go to politics and are running for office, that is, of this sign of equality, that this person, that military man, if we get on the list, he adds some percentage, this is not an ambiguous decision, this is an ambiguous result, that is, yes, electoral logic, the electoral process does not work like that, there is no such arithmetic, take here and add here, no, it doesn’t work that way, in order to talk about the rating of this or that political force, there is a whole complex of factors, if we are talking about conditional military personnel who have a level of trust, there, they are in cognition , suddenly they find themselves on the heads of a political force, where corrupt officials are represented, for example, or where there are old politicians, this does not mean that all this 90% of trust and support... will be this political force. therefore, i see here more , well, a misunderstanding of electoral processes, or really certain phobias, fears, or rather, fears

that exist in the environment of the president regarding the fact that certain military personnel will enter politics. as history shows, sometimes the military make good politicians, and sometimes they make very bad ones. well, obviously, things are different, moreover, if we talk about our military, well, some of them, first of all, we understand that this is a phobia. she is relative to the diligent, the diligent never said that he was going to engage in politics and go somewhere in politics, he is, well, he, he understands his profession, and he develops within the limits of the profession he once chose for himself, this is one thing and another the thing is, when we're talking about the, well, hundreds of thousands of people who are in the military right now, who are not in the military, they're people who had a civilian career, they're now retired from the military, and why after... after they go back to their civil life, they cannot go to politics and we will interpret

them as some people who are not as good-looking as zelsky likes, who avoided , for example, service in the army, i do not understand, for example, for me this is an incomprehensible position a priori, olya, we are talking about professional soldiers, that is these are not those who were mobilized, received a rank, because they had a military department or had some military experience. and they entered the army from civilian life, stayed in the army during the war, then retired and went into politics, right? this is not about these people, president appeal, we are talking about professional soldiers, yes, professional soldiers almost did not participate in the last elections , there were two or three of them, that’s all, that is, it was not a mass march, there is nothing to say about it at all, it is a normal fluctuation, exactly as there were as many priests, there were actually more artists, but let's be honest, if we talk about... about the military, after the 14th year, in

all councils of all levels, they can really be compared with the arrival of the call of priests to organs in local councils and supreme council somewhere after 1991, we will remember that there were even some local councils where there were three or four priests... local councils, that is, somewhere it is approximately in number, somewhere it is, and then there is a decrease in trust, then there is a reassessment, again there were mostly people who had been connected with the army for quite a long time , who returned there without resignation from another job in the army, well, that is, it is also very strange, come on, this is such a story, i understood yours, well, rather than all this just some really well phobia, but there is one more thing that me. actually very impressed with what has been said in recent days, and let's listen to it, because it is such a statement of arachamia, which, well, it seems that it has not been paid attention to, but in view of

the conversations that, as he says, he clearly said that the elections it won't happen, we all agreed that there will be no elections and that it shouldn't happen, but at the same time, for some reason he thinks that there can be some kind of referendum, let 's see, now i think that the entire leadership of ukraine is military-aviation, and political and the military about fighting, why? because we can't sit down at the transition table now, here the negotiating position is very bad, why are we going to sit down now, where we remain, let's just finish, well , do you think that ukrainian society will accept, i generally think that if the war does not end, except for a complete victory, ugh, everything else should be go through a referendum, because i’m not sure, i don’t know, if it’s possible... it will be an organic, you know, ending, like in korea, where nothing was signed, huh, then maybe it’s possible, but if someone signs something, well, i no, and then it will have to be ratified in

the parliament, well, they will just kill each other, there will be very polar views, and such things, i think, should only be done through a referendum, because when the people say that it is necessary, then i will vote, well, without looking, i will simply put my opinion away and do as the people said , and if this is what the deputies will say, it will be decided, well, i don’t feel the strength to decide, let alone to campaign for something, i still haven’t understood why mr. rahamiya doesn’t feel the strength to decide, that is, what is he preparing, that he is afraid to decide this, what is it all about, maybe that is why we are seeing all the fluctuations now and we see, well, sometimes it is quite difficult to analyze the speeches of our deputies, some, here we hear two mutually exclusive opinions, on

the one hand we will choose no, and on the other hand we will choose a referendum. a referendum when after the end of hostilities, no, instead of the end of hostilities, this is the impression , well, he says what will happen after the end of the war, like a complete victory, or a referendum, a referendum to ratify something signed, yes, that is, we are talking about post-war period, in the post-war period holding some kind of referendum, which should legitimize what they during the negotiation process... they may come out, yes , that's what he's talking about, but this is a transfer of responsibility to the citizens, because they have a mandate for negotiations, and they have the power for this, for which in the 19th voted, therefore, to talk about the fact that, let 's put every decision of the negotiation process to a referendum, well, this is speculation, absolutely speculation,

the negotiation process is difficult. to constantly scold the people for their opinion, you can conduct polls, but to talk about making some kind of decision in a referendum, that is well, to a certain extent, speculation, but in this way they cover, as they say, their way of retreat by appealing to the people in the event of the need to make unpopular decisions, this is important, because at the moment both the arakhan and this fix that the other the option of ending the war, which is victory, society will not accept, everything else is unpopular decisions, and therefore it is a challenge to the existing government, to which the existing government does not have an answer yet, and it uses such a term as a referendum, allegedly after consulting the people, carried out , and taking

for citizens to consider an unpopular decision, giving...so to speak, the right to decide directly to citizens, although they perfectly understand in power how referendums are held, how it is possible to ensure the necessary result, that the answer is either yes or no, to the formulated question that referendums have consultative direct actions, that the referendum procedure also needs verification, ensuring different opportunities to introduce different... and access to mass media of different points of view and so on, that is, it is a lot, but if you can't sorry to interrupt, but the most important thing is, well, isn't this situation similar to the one you described , when everyone says there will be no elections, but everyone is preparing for them, and on the other hand, we are not negotiating, but for some reason we are talking about a referendum in order to secure something, well, the fact that elections, the fact that negotiations are not

conducted, maybe this is a trick, because negotiations and consultations are conducted on various platforms, maybe they are not direct, but with the help of intermediaries, they are conducted, although at least not exchanged captives, yet is happening, but negotiations about it are going on, i am not revealing a big secret, and therefore to say that there are no negotiations, no, they are on one or another small case, there are no major negotiations that provided for the achievement of any agreements, key agreements on this war, such there are no negotiations at the moment. because none of the hundred parties is yet ready to officially enter them, each party sees the situation as one that can change it to its advantage. what arahamia says, i only care about two, two issues, if you want to hold elections, but you don't want a problem, but, let's say, you declare that you don't want to hold elections, but you want to hold a referendum, this is an outright manipulation and a lie, because the procedure...