[000:00:00;00] talking about the fact that we support ukraine, and ukraine must win, this, well, no, is not equivalent to the fact that we will do everything for russia to lose, and totally lose, that's right, i understand, that's it , mr. sergey, and the main, main problem, they don't want the defeat of russia, they don't want this er, monster, monster, which is the biggest threat to everything. world has finally disappeared from the face of the earth and they do not want to understand and this is the saddest and most terrible thing for me, they do not want to understand that the disappearance of russia from political map of the world in its current form, this is a colossal plus for their national security, for their economy, for the fight against warming, because russia

is producing in this regard... things, in order to jointly develop the arctic, in order that, countries , which will be formed on its territory, were peaceful, were demilitarized, were such that you can do normal business with, as good neighbors, instead, they think that it is bad, that it is better to have, putin's pro-fascist regime, which threatens everything, includes ... or by others than to act in advance, that is the huge mental problem of our western partners, unfortunately, they are not leaders , they follow, they follow events, they do not want to create the events themselves, they only react, this is a reactive policy that always leads to that in the end you will lose, well

, unfortunately, it is mental. the problem with our current western partners is that they do not want to closely understand objective and obvious things. and mr. volodymyr, two statements from the united states of america, the american congress can to allocate additional aid to ukraine by the end of this year, said mike johnson, the speaker of the lower house of the highest legislative body of the united states of america, the house of representatives, during a trip to the state of florida. let's listen. ukraine is another priority, of course we cannot allow vladimir putin to march through europe and we fully understand the need to provide assistance to ukraine, but we have repeatedly said that in order to allocate additional support to ukraine, which most members of congress consider important, we also need to change our own border policy. and the strategic communications coordinator of the

national security council of the white house. john kirby said that the additional funding for ukraine and israel that president joe biden has asked congress for is absolutely necessary, let's hear it kirby. i would like to remind members of congress when they return to work that the numbers in this supplemental request were obtained from our ukrainian and israeli partners. we didn't just pull these numbers out of thin air, they're whole answer because our partners have told us what they need in the coming months. this is the impression, mr. volodymyr, that the americans are convincing themselves, that is, one part , the congress, and part of the white house, are convincing each other, whom they are convincing and whether, in this situation, aid to ukraine does not become a hostage to the presidential campaign,

which has already begun... i so i understand in the united states of america, and in this situation, will we not be hostages of what will happen in the election campaign from the 24th year onward? well you know if this decision, which we are talking about now, will be made during these two weeks, the next, then, of course, then ukraine will be used to a lesser extent by some, you know, element of the pre-election struggle, but if this does not happen, then it is obvious that we will, be played out between republicans and democrats, and everyone will try to get some political dividends in this regard, but for some reason it seems to me that, despite everything, and this statement by johnson, which you just

mentioned, it indicates that after all... most of the sober-minded politicians on the capitalist hill understand that not helping ukraine is a loss for america itself, and they perfectly understand that by helping ukraine in the form of far from ultra-modern ukrainian-american weapons, they are helping their own military industry to increase efforts, create jobs and earn a lot of money, not only in america, but also around the world, because the world sees what this, excuse me, rubbish of soviet, soviet-russian production is capable of and how it cracks under the blows of dale...' on a new of american equipment, so this is also an entry into the world market on an even larger scale , so i think that the decision will be positive, but there is no need to disperse, we need to convince everyone and everything, both in america and in

europe, that the defeat of russia is their victory , and that's when we'll have what we need, otherwise it's going to be constant stuff, you know, from the tennik formula. today there, tomorrow here. mr. volodymyr, at the same time, today there was information that the office of the president of ukraine is sending special forces to the united states of america, as if they are going there deputies, government officials, to build relations with the republicans, well, at least, yes, the publication nва insists, referring to its sources in the office of the president of ukraine. again, about the diplomat. who conducts it, how is it conducted, how professionally do we now communicate with the americans in order to protect our interests and do we do it at that level and in that way? well, you know, this is the right move, i

will tell you honestly that this is a good idea, it has been talked about many times before, it seems that now it is finally starting to be implemented, what does this mean, it means that two or three... ukrainian politicians with two or three representatives of some public organizations come to the conditional state of arizona and have a substantive, understandable, simple conversation with those who govern this state, with the same representatives of the republican party, say. the only point that surprises me in this situation is that, as some people say, i can't say anything here 100 percent, that only representatives of one action will be sent, because, they say, well, those who know the english language, well you you know, there is in the parliament there are many deputies who know good english, but not only from one faction, so i think that if we want

to work in this case not for the party's interests, but for the state's interests, it should apply to everyone, all those who want and can do this work , and you can really gather a lot of such people in the parliament, well, you mean that, after all, this conversation should be a general public, a single ukrainian general public, and not absolutely, and not divided there own, foreign, absolutely, and if to things, they will, er, send only their own, that will be more one sign that not everything is in order with our democracy, because they don't do it that way, especially when it comes to... a period of war, when there is no party in war, when there are no factions in war, there are those who are either on their side country or against it, i think it is impossible to consider the situation differently.

thank you, mr. volodymyr, for the conversation, it was volodymyr ogrysko, politician, diplomat, former minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who who is currently watching us live on youtube and facebook, please like this video and also subscribe to our pages on these social networks. and besides, take part in our survey, there are literally a few minutes left until the end of the first part of our program, so we ask you about the following: do ukraine need diplomatic relations with belarus, yes, no, everything is just on youtube, two options, or leave comments under this video, what do you think about it, and for those who are watching us now tv, pick up the phone and vote if you think we need diplomatic relations with belarus, 0800 211

381, no, 0800-211-382, we already have the interim results of this vote, let's see on the screen what has already been voted and in what proportions are our viewers, because i know that there are already certain results on youtube, yes , let’s see, yes, 22%, 78% no, well, that is, 22% of our tv viewers believe that diplomatic relations with belarus are necessary for ukraine, on youtube has approximately the same proportion, yes 20%, no - 80%. got home from heavy and bulky saws, then the compact and powerful strong saw will unpack the tv just for you. now you can easily trim trees and bushes. the strong saw is so convenient to use for carpentry, too. an ideal tool for your home or

garden, and the price is only uah 1,499. also a reliable battery in the kit, cut branches, cut timber, chop firewood, you will do all this in one movement, with the strongg saw, just look how quickly it copes, even with thick branches, the strong saw easy to use and mobile, once it's ready, and unlike standard forks , it's so convenient to use in hard -to-reach places, it comes with a powerful... wrench and screwdriver, as well as a charger that will allow you to always have a charged saw at hand, call and order: a reliable and convenient tool, for only uah 1,499. powerful strong saw, what you need, call, attention, a good offer, order a smart light bulb at a special promotional price, only uah 149. durable, reliable and so powerful. and the price only 149 hryvnias. ordinary light bulbs are available in stores. cost more than 250 hryvnias, and we

offer you a light bulb that lights up even when there is no light for only 149 hryvnias. take advantage of such a favorable offer. the smart light bulb works even without electricity for up to 6 hours without recharging. the secret is in the built-in city battery. it's so convenient, especially now. and the bulb is a smart light, it is not afraid of voltage drops and will not break when dropped. the standard base is suitable for almost any chandelier or floor lamp. suddenly they turned off the lights, you need to light candles again or look for a flashlight in which the batteries are dead, let there be light in your home, always, a smart light bulb for only uah 149, it works even without electricity, the offer is limited, call, see this week in the program judicial control with tatyana shustrova. applicants to the constitutional court, to whom the council of judges gave

the green light. they delegate there those who are representatives of the old system. but why do candidates register property for relatives? my sister earns a pretty good salary received from 2005 to 2013. on thursday, november 30, at 5:45 p.m., watch the judicial control program with tatiana shostrova on the espresso tv channel. events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess events, analyze them, modeling our future, every saturday at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m. studio zahid with anton borkovsky at espresso. shelter in

the apartment building where i live, or can strangers be allowed there? yes, during an alarm , people who do not live there can and should be allowed into the shelter of the house, because everyone has the right to civil protection, even if the person is not familiar to you, it is everyone's right to be safe. greetings friends, the tv channel is live, the verdict program continues, we are working live, my name is serhii rudenko, today i am in the program. the activation of russian spies in the ukrainian government, how to overcome the influence of the kremlin, the ban of the moscow patriarchate, the relevant bill blocked in the council, which of the people's deputies is against and why? the green cardinal of kyiv, a fair in... the list of politicians, has the head

of the president's office really become a key figure in the ukrainian government? friends, today we are conducting a survey, today we are asking you about this, do ukraine need diplomatic relations with belarus, yes no, please vote on our youtube and facebook platforms, please like this video, subscribe to our youtube pages and facebook, well, if you watch us on tv, pick up your phone and progo... if you think that ukraine needs diplomatic relations with belarus, call 0800-21381, not 080-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free. today in our program is sofia fedina, people's deputy of ukraine, european solidarity faction, mrs. sofia, i congratulate you, thank you for joining our broadcast. good evening, friends, thank you for the invitation. oksana savchuk, people's deputy of ukraine, non-partisan. mrs. oksana, i

congratulate you and i am glad to see you on our air. i congratulate you. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. mykhailo tsimbalyuk, people's deputy of ukraine. motherland action. mr. mykhailo, i congratulate you and thank you for being with us today. i wish everyone good health. greetings, well, since we, ladies and gentlemen, are asking our tv viewers whether ukraine needs diplomatic relations with belarus, i will also ask you what you think about it, because ukraine still maintains diplomatic relations with belarus, despite the fact that since on february 24, 22, belarus acted as a springboard for the attack. to ukraine, and lukashenko acts as a co-aggressor and co-defendant of those war crimes committed by the russian federation, the russian army on the territory of the ukrainian state. mrs. sofia, please, you have the floor.

our inter-factional association for a free and democratic belarus, ever since the illegal elections, in which lukashenko essentially declared himself the ruler, demanded the severing of diplomatic relations and the recognition of this particular government in belarus as invalid, i i personally believe that the maximum that there should be some envoy or military attache, through which could be negotiated with regard to, in particular, our people who are in belarus and also those belarusians who today defend the ukrainian state in order to protect their rights. all the rest, belarus today is an appendage of the moscow federation, which helps to attack and destroy the ukrainian state. thank you, ms. oksano. what do you think about this? well, look, first of all we have belarusians who are fighting for ukraine today, and first of all, secondly - this is a country that today we really perceive as being under illegal and undemocratic leadership

elected president lukashenka, but in ukraine we divide belarus into the one that wants to be democratic, and the belarus that really leads today. a tyrant and a president completely dependent on russia , that is exactly why i believe that we should first of all condemn all the actions of the current government and the current president and actually hope that ukraine is ready to cooperate with the democratically elected leadership of belarus, but today it not like that thank you, ms. oksana, mr. mykhay. but when the war between russia and georgia began, then georgia severed diplomatic relations with russia, and all consular issues were resolved through the swiss embassy in moscow. well, it is clear that when we talk about diplomatic relations between ukraine and belarus, we are talking about those citizens to whom we provide

assistance on the territory of belarus, if we do not have an embassy or consulate there, it means that we will not be able to help them with anything . can we follow the georgian path and create such conditions that will allow us to ensure the rights of our citizens on the territory of the republic of belarus, but at the same time we will not maintain diplomatic relations with the current, with the current belarus of lukashenka. thank you, sir, the question is actually very difficult, i am not a specialist in diplomacy, but i will say that even the representatives of the opposition of belarus, which is divided, they also do not have a single answer, on the one hand, yes, someone needs to represent the citizens of ukraine who are on the territory of belarus, but will the consular and diplomatic services in such a state as belarus be able to adequately

represent and protect the citizens of ukraine, in i have a big doubt, because of the fact that, in my opinion, it is necessary not to delay. or to give a clear signal both to ukrainian society from the side of an external political agency, i.e. the ministry of foreign affairs, or also to our european partners , why we act as a state, although perhaps in reality we do not know something, and there is some other, different behavior, agreed upon with our partners, it is important that we do not look for originality here, follow the advice of our international partners, they know more, and for them it is a geopolitical game, thank you mr. mykhai ladies and gentlemen, let's get back to ukraine, to those issues that, over the past few days, have been sufficiently relevant for society,

for the parliament, for the military leadership, and for those who monitor social networks, this this absentee discussion, which was launched in the media office by two people's deputies, one of them is the head of the servant of the people faction, and the other is a substitute member of the servant of the people faction, but the deputy head of the parliamentary committee on national security and defense, davyd rahamiy and marian bezugl, regarding the plan for the 24th year, eh , i think that most of our viewers and readers on social networks, including, have seen that mariana bezugla wrote a large post where she accused the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine that she does not have , the plan for the 24th year, issued a lot of different figures there, which can now be qualified as disclosures,

state secrets, but at the same time bluntly stated that in her opinion zaluzhny should resign, but from the moment the bluntness announced, there is no reaction from the supreme commander-in-chief, that is, the member zelenskyi's team is reprimanded by the commander-in-chief, who obeys... and is accountable to the supreme commander-in-chief, and he is simply silent so far, sir, ms. sofia, why do you think zelskyi is silent, and why doesn't bezugla ask zelskyi where the plan for 2024 is, after all, zelenskyi is higher in this hierarchy, he is the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine, well, you know, if you're joking, they probably have one and only plan, and the plan here does not mean the actions of the armed forces of ukraine, but those substances that are prohibited to

cultivation in ukraine, because otherwise i cannot assess this completely inadequate situation that is happening with a particular deputy. if we say why the commander-in-chief is silent, as far as i know, in the office of the president, they wake up and go to bed with an assessment of public sentiment, and accordingly there are people who test public sentiment, and after that... the president already reacts in some way, so i think , that they are now trying to understand, evaluate, calculate the possible losses from these specific scandals, it is meant, what is the reaction of society, and the reaction of the society is critically negative regarding the actions of arahamia, and everyone else is extremely supportive of the commander-in-chief, so i think that now there is a wait, but what can i say so as not to get burned and what can i say so as not to harm my own rating , well, but i’m sorry, you know, when talking about the plan , when talking about this post, mrs.

bezugliy, i saw a very interesting phrase there, why is the purchase of turnstiles not included, i apologize, the procurement is handled by the ministry of defense and the agency procurement, and there is a medical command, which the ministry of defense is also responsible for appointing and dismissing, if bezugla makes claims about turnstiles, then one can doubt her competence at all, because volunteers have been shouting for six months that turnstiles are necessary and to change and issue those that are american and in general to bring to responsibility the command of the medical forces that were previous, so in this case, i understand that as a member of the committee, she has the right to ask questions, but what she asked in this particular questions, it is in essence and here are all the posts that she exhibited and photos against the background of the equipment, and here i see the same in the case of vagne. where the information merged, i think that there are many points at which she should already be responsible for the disclosure

of, let's say, information with limited access, and today she should be responsible for the attempt to undermine the defense capabilities of the ukrainian state, because that is all that it throws out, it is aimed at this, an attempt to discredit the armed forces of ukraine, and the ukrainians will not allow this to be done, mr. general, let me ask you as in a person who... very clearly understands how the system should work , especially during war and in general the paramilitary structure, or the military structure, which is our entire army during war, that is what bezugla and arahamia are doing now , how are they generally evaluated from the point of view of military people and those people who are used to not saying some things in public and or not... spilling there plans for the 24th year to the general public, well, for example, to the parliament, where there may be fsb agents , not that they can, but

obviously there are, because we see that they are the last ones two... months, two people's deputies were suspected of treason, they are shufrych and dubinsky, is this how a person who is one of the heads of the committee on national security and defense should behave, and how it threatens the armed forces and society. first of all, i am categorically against any public discussions during martial law, regarding the methods of uh, regarding the defense forces, and even more so, any judgments, even certain numbers are displayed in the post, i am worried about such a situation, because ms. maryana, she is the secretary of the working group to which

i enter as a representative of the faction where a lot of important issues are being discussed, which are discussed in secret, which cannot be made public, moreover, we are there without mobile phones and even without watches, and some facts are presented exactly will be discussed at such closed meetings, because it categorically contradicts any orders, doctrines, and it harms the national defense security, because the aggressor state does not need to have deep, deep intelligence. it is enough for some judgments and analysis certain expressions in the public sphere, due to the fact that, i am sure that the president, as the commander-in-chief, is not silent, but he understands that this should not be a public discussion, i am sure that this situation was also discussed at the level of the commander-in-chief, it is important that these persons draw

conclusions immediately, because now the situation is not easy, and such discussions, which turn into not only nationwide, but international judgments, they are not useful, i would like everyone to draw conclusions, because this is not the first such emission into the public sphere , but still once again, i emphasize, conclusions must be made by everyone, including representatives of the committee of the national security and defense council and those who allow themselves to comment unprofessionally on those things that are truly subject to the seal of state secret and are not subject to any disclosure, but i will never believe that

in such a structure as a servant of the people, a civilian person will simply come out and start pouring water, let's say, in the direction of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine during the war, that is, i absolutely reject what she can do on her own initiative, she i tried, and i don’t like the hard worker there, well, it doesn’t work that way, ms. oksana, what do you think, is it possible to talk about some, perhaps political, roar of political jealousy, political competition, or is it possible that the leadership, the civilian leadership of the state . is preparing a replacement for the head of the armed forces of ukraine, just now such an information ground is being prepared, well, you see, he did not submit a plan there, he also did not submit a mobilization plan, now some problems will begin there at the front, well, it means that he is also guilty and must answer, even people's deputies talk about it, not only there, at the commander-in-chief's post or

, let's say, in the offices of the president's office, well, let's start with the fact that when the defense committee was formed at the very beginning, and we still entered the parliament, when we have had a war since 2014, so any candidacy that was elected to this committee , among the people's deputies, it actually clearly happened with the approval, and not only the servants of the people faction, if we are talking about their composition, including victory. regarding other colleagues from other factions, after all, these were people who agreed, and that's why when today and not only today, when constantly for a certain time, marijanna, because i don't know other members of the committee, who constantly gives out some different points, allows himself to comment and take it upon himself