not aware that in ms. ostashchenko's warehouses there were medicinal products , crystalloids, solutions, which we have in tons at every front-line checkpoint, and they disappeared, the expiration date has expired, and of course, our partners are not satisfied with this, because they transferred it, but it turns out that it was not used, and therefore it is a pity that this system still endured for so long, and let's say, in this case there is not even an investigation, we know that there were moments of corruption when i worked, the right hand man was mr. ostashchenko, colonel prudnikov, who worked purchases under yanukovych, and he was reinstated again, and he through his daughter-in-law, the deputies are conducting an investigation there, he does not remember how many millions of hryvnias, he conducted tenders through his daughter-in-law for hospitals, including civilian hospitals, this that was about, and that's why even this is just like that... this person was quietly removed.

such things, unfortunately, this means that the military branch cannot always investigate corruption internally, there should be, there should be public control, and therefore such things it is necessary to help, to make sure that the system still works and volunteers only help, and not replace the state, because now, as far as the checkpoint, combat medics, volunteers and charitable organizations have replaced the state, it is very difficult for them, i recently. foundation managers, this is one of the best foundations that helps combat medics, they had 4,000 applications for tactical medicine, for 100 points, for combat medics, at the same time when they went, yes, well, combat medics from the kms check, they were shocked that on the chiefs and brigade commanders had 100% of the property in warehouses, that is, it was not distributed to battalions. were not distributed in the battalion

, because, because they were afraid of write-off, because the mechanism of simplified write-off has only now started to work, there is an order, they will announce it, the command of the medical forces, according to which it is now simplified, that it is necessary only by the order of cambrig, to write off the property there, as far as i understood that it is possible to write off up to 8100 medical assets per day, this order is just cambriga, that before it was necessary to write off each catheter, each, each, every turnstile, and by the way, just a turnstile, it was impossible to write it off without first-aid kits, that is, it was thrown away, well, in vain, almost two years of an uncorrected system, and it is certainly a shame, i hope that at least the new command should do it , i hope that a lot of people from the military will come to work in the new command, because of course we are interested in having many young, zealous, motivated, already very professional doctors working there. thank you, ms. oksana, it was volunteer oksana. friends, we are live

channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live on youtube, please like this video, subscribe to our youtube page and participate in our vote, today we ask you the following , does the west want to defeat russia, yes , no, everything is quite simple on youtube, choose an option, yes or no, or write your own opinion, what do you think about it, we are interested to know, write: and you can vote by phone lines, now we see intermediate results vote, 34% believe that the west wants to defeat russia, 606%, do not think that the west wants to defeat russia, phone numbers to vote, by phone, phone numbers, or rather, donate 0800 211-381 if you think that the west wants.. defeat of russia no

0800 211-382. all calls to these numbers are free, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next , we will be in touch with dmytro snigiv, co-chairman of the public initiative right to the right. mr. dmitry, i congratulate you and thank you for joining our broadcast. congratulations. come on, sir. congratulations, thank you for the invitation. let's start our conversation with the ukrainian saboteurs who were in bama, according to reports, the ukrainian special services staged a sabotage on the baikal-amur highway, and with the goal, on this highway , goods of military purpose were brought or are being brought from china, artillery shells from north korea, to ukrainian saboteurs managed to arrange two explosions, the first one is a freight train exploded directly north, tunnels and

after that the russians began to use a detour through the damn city. during the passage of the train over this high 35-meter bridge, as reported by the ukrainian special services, explosive devices were planted in it, how do you assess the work of ukrainian saboteurs, mr. dmytro, in the enemy's rear? well, if this information is confirmed, then , accordingly, it is about blocking the main logistics of the russian occupiers, namely the baikal highway, and both the main and the secondary route, it is about the fact that the russian federation is currently in fact. military equipment from communist korea, which is used in the first place artillery shells in the war against ukraine, therefore the blocking of these extremely important logistical components, i.e. the northern tunnels, respectively, of the cities, is a successful , extremely successful operation of the ukrainian special services, and

it is worth talking about a multi-planned combination, that is, first the detonation in the northern tunnel, and then, respectively detonation across the bridge, i.e. the calculation was that the russians would clearly use a duplicate logistics route, and for the transportation of dangerous goods as well, therefore it is no accident six cisterns caught fire on the bridge, the consequences of the fire were such that a fire engine was used to contain them, these are serious consequences, and it is worth noting that the northern tunnel, respectively , of the city, they got out, well, at least for several weeks, with the corresponding work schedule, and this is a blow not only to the army, but also, accordingly, to the economic component

of the russian federation, the economic losses will be quite significant. how do you generally feel about the transfer of the war to the territory of russia, well, no only, work. sabotage and reconnaissance groups , and in general strikes on military facilities, mass strikes, we observed for a certain time how ukrainian drones were used and these strikes were carried out on the territory of the russian federation, because today information was made public that from the beginning of 23 in 2018, the russian occupiers shelled populated areas in 24 regions of ukraine 59,000 times, as a result of which 2,000 people died and 11,000 were injured. this is information from the head of the ministry of internal affairs of ukraine , ihor klymenko. military facilities, because they usually hit peaceful cities and the civilian infrastructure of ukraine. we cannot, we

have the legal and moral right to attack military facilities on the territory of the russian federation, they are a legitimate military target according to all international norms, the means are another matter. damage to the ukrainian side, unfortunately, there is a certain ban on the part of the western countries on the use of the corresponding hymars, mrs and, most importantly , scalper shtorshed air-based cruise missiles, therefore on the territory of the russian the federation uses exclusively ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles or modified missiles of the s200 or neptune type. unfortunately, we are forced to state that the ukrainian missile program. namely, otrk sapsan , which was presented to the ukrainian community back in 2016, and remained in the framework of two copies, one of which was actually the front of the saudi side, which gave money for this

program, and the other to the armed forces of ukraine, so the tactics and technical characteristics of the falcon are 500 km, the range of damage, and i have it the question is the second year of the war, and when is it currently released. representatives of the ukrainian military industry are talking about the fact that $500 million is not enough for the improvement of the peregrine falcon, i have big questions, and what is happening, are they able to find $500 million, is there no political will to create ukrainian weapons that could strike targets exclusively on the territory of the enemy country, we are primarily talking about military airfields and, accordingly, military factories for the production of, including cruise missiles without... aircraft, i.e. this the issue is complex, if we expect to solve this issue, namely, the neutralization of the enemy’s military infrastructure on its territory exclusively with the help of unmanned aerial vehicles, then this is the wrong way, there should be a missile program of ukraine, accordingly

, a so-called missile spear, which would give an adequate response to by the enemy's efforts, but to create storage bases in the zone of destruction of these missiles and accordingly develop the military infrastructure for the production of weapons on ukrainian territory. today. mr. dmitry, british edition za economist writes that russia can defeat ukraine and is winning so far, as they write, europe needs a defense plan, do you agree with the assumption made by the journalists of this british publication, that this is possible? well, let's start with the fact that, well , a lot of questions for this publication, at least, recall frankly fake information about the capacity. the military industry before the modernization of russian tanks, which are stored at

long-term storage bases, called the number up to 115 per month. it is worth noting that the new york times, so far, has noted that 200 tanks per year, that is, here is the question, and bild , in turn, provided information about the capacity of the russian military-industrial complex at the level of 600 tanks, yes, i told you the three most respected western publications, one of which you quoted. and all three editions do not correspond, the information of these three does not correspond to reality. the last russian tank came from scratch from the assembly line in 2011, for which you spread frankly stupid and provocative information, including in the ukrainian segment, in order to create the appropriate mood among the ukrainian people regarding the capabilities of the russian side. answering your question, no, russia has not won and will not win, moreover, despite all the hysteria of the western media that there are no results of the ukrainian counteroffensive,

it is worth saying that ukraine has already created a historical precedent in world history when, not having a fleet, it forced and inflicted the catastrophic defeat of the russian federation, which had the second largest fleet in the black sea basin. this is an unprecedented case in world history, it is the first. second, the ukrainian side removed nervous tension in western countries regarding the possibility of russian weapons, namely cruise missiles such as caliber and eskander and, accordingly, kinjal, with which they used to scare nato countries. it was the ukrainian pppo that proved that they are not that there are no analogues there, but they are also... successfully disposed of by the ukrainian pppo as actually iranian

drones and, accordingly, the key moment of the military-political pressure of the russian federation was removed precisely by this missile potential on nato countries from the agenda of the day, and the third, dear company, night terror of nato countries - the first tank army, which was considered one of the most combat-capable, it actually ceased to exist on the territory of ukraine, and western analysts admit this, with a sigh of relief, so what defeats are you, sorry, hanging noodles on the ears of ukrainian society, well, you are asking british journalists, not tv channel, we are asking you as an expert, how do you assess this, well, look, it is negative, mr. sergey, extremely negative, because this is, i emphasize once again, the information does not correspond to reality, and most of it is aimed at

to create a certain informational background, let's be frank, this is an element of military-political pressure on the military and political leadership of ukraine with the aim of making territorial concessions, finally we need to call things by their names, stop playing zopp language, look, mr. dmytro, when we speak about what pushes ukraine to make territorial concessions, when we talk about the fact that some western countries are careful to ensure that russia does not suffer a defeat, do you think there is some common vision in the west, in western countries, i would i will say, because a collective measure is a very bad concept in western countries, about what the defeat of russia should be, how this war should end. for russia, and what is the victory of ukraine, because a victory in ukraine is seen

one way, in the west, a victory over russia is seen differently. absolutely wrong, and it is worth saying that there is no clear understanding of what is really in their interpretation of the victory of ukraine and how they actually consider the final stage of this war. in the west, there is an opinion that military action cannot be allowed the defeat of the russian federation, because it will lead to decentralization processes within the empire itself, the collapse of the empire and its creation on its ruins. a number of countries that will, well , possess nuclear weapons, this scares them more than anything, therefore, to talk about the fact that in the west they are sleeping and they see how ukrainian soldiers will march, respectively, in the red square, no, this does not correspond to reality, and therefore such a restrained nature of the transfer of the latest

technologies of high-precision weapons of ukraine, on the one hand, seems to be a help. but on the other hand side, it is a weapon of deterring an attack, and not of deoccupying the territory, thus inflicting a military defeat on the russian federation. the coordinator of the white house for strategic communications, john kirby, during the briefing, once again called on american lawmakers from both chambers of the highest legislative body of the united states of america not to delay the allocation of funds for ukraine, let's listen to what he said. we expect russia to return to these brutal tactics in the winter and once again attempt a campaign to destroy critical energy infrastructure of ukraine. in the past few days alone, we have witnessed several airstrikes. it seems that

they were aimed at those defense systems that the ukrainians installed to protect their energy. and over the weekend, the russians carried out a large-scale attack using drones against kyiv and other cities. president putin intends to continue this conflict and bring it directly to the ukrainian people in the coldest month of the year. mr. dmitry, when you listen to kirby and other high-ranking officials, including the north atlantic alliance, in principle, everything of course, they understand how it threatens ukraine, they understand how it threatens europe, they understand how it threatens the world. what is missing, or what arguments are sufficient for them to give the ukrainians the weapons that will allow them to defeat russia? an interesting question is what arguments, well, first of all, let's talk about the fact that the main argument, not in favor of

ukraine, is the presence of corruption schemes in the system of the ministry of defense of ukraine. let's call a spade a spade, if after the so -called voluntary resignation of resnikov comes out the president of lithuania, one of the most loyal friends of ukraine, says that the corrupt component of material and technical procurement for the systems of the ministry of defense has become an obstacle to the accelerated nature of military and technical assistance to ukraine, then here is the answer, until they are eradicated corruption phenomena. schemes not only in the defense system, but also in accordance with the entire structure of the defense forces of ukraine, including law enforcement agencies, the security service of ukraine and others, which are responsible for a number of, say, areas, then, to calculate on the expanded nature of military-technical

assistance, we are unlikely to be able to, well , the countries of the european union so often... talk about sanctions, about the fact that everything must be done so that russia experiences economic, well, if not collapse, some kind of economic troubles , and there was information from skynews that some countries of the european union have increased the import of russian nuclear fuel, despite the desire to completely abandon it. bulgaria, the czech republic, finland, hungary and slovakia will exceed the level of nuclear fuel imports with russia federation compared to the 21st year by 30%. although such... is not subject to eu sanctions , the bloc seeks to reduce its dependence on moscow, the article says, you believe that economic sanctions can simply suffocate hydra racism, because this hydra racism needs money, a lot of money, which russia receives from exporting your products to

foreign markets, i don't believe it, mr. serhiy, thank you. i'll explain why: since the start of the full-scale invasion, the russian federation has sold a fantastic $550 billion worth of ransom minerals, and 180 of them belong to eu countries. explain to me, these are double standards, about which then the expanded nature of the military-technical, excuse me, economic sanctions against the russian federation is in question, another example, already after the so-called and strengthened nature of economic sanctions, information appears that the russian federation was able to establish supplies for the needs of the military industry, microelements, microchips. necessary for the production of high-precision weapons in the amount of 3.2 billion dollars, and the lion's share is the firms, respectively

, of the united states and eu countries. here you go the answer to your question. on the one hand , they talk about the ineffectiveness of economic sanctions, on the other hand, they actually trade with the russian occupiers, giving them the opportunity to resume production, first of all, of means of destruction, and most importantly. serhiy, there is no point in talking about it, despite the economic sanctions, the russian federation surprisingly increased its gdp by 4.6%. likewise, over the past year, the volume of import-export operations of the russian federation has increased, and it is no coincidence that the latest decree was signed by the russian dictator, this allocation of 11 trillion rubles for the needs of the defense sector. this amount exceeds all the previous ones by several times, so explain to me, well, what is the effectiveness of sanctions, what

effectiveness of sanctions are they telling us about in western countries, as the only possible option for restraining russian aggression in ukraine. thank you, mr. dmytro, it was dmytro snigov, a military expert. friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those. now watch us on youtube and facebook, please like us this video and also vote in our poll today we are asking you if the west wants to defeat russia yes no and you can also vote by phone if you are sitting in front of the tv please pick up your phone and vote , if you think the west is bent on defeating russia, then call 0800 211-381, no, 0800 211-382. calls to these numbers are free, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. ihor lapin, an officer of the armed forces, will be in touch with us further forces of ukraine, major, special officer,

people's deputy of ukraine of the eighth convocation. mr. major, i welcome you and thank you for joining our broadcast. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. mr. major, we are asking our tv viewers what they think, whether the west wants to defeat russia or not, how would you ... the west just wants to end russia and how does it want to end russia, if it wants to? well, let's be honest, i have already said many times that the western world is ready before our victory, he is even ready for the defeat of russia, but he is not ready for a quick defeat of russia, because a lot of geopolitics has not yet been resolved. issues that the western world would like to solve for itself. well, for example , to deal with china in the context of the energy carriers of russian siberia, is it possible

that now we see that the american military-industrial complex has reached a level that it has not reached in the last 10 years, and we also need to speak frankly about this, because there are government orders, even for the aid of ukraine, but everything is allocated a lot for this colossal funds, so the question is whether they are ready for a quick defeat of russia, no, they are not ready, they are absolutely not ready, and i see that at this rate they will not be ready in a year or two either, well , let's be honest, abrams tanks in march, april, 22nd year, and the f-16 planes are conditionally there in the summer of 22nd year, that would probably be a different story, however, today we see that the russians are restoring their military, military potential, yes. they are stepping forward in the context of receiving additional aid from some sanctioned north korea, which already has dozens years under sanctions, and today

it is already sending to russia, well, they say, about 2,000 containers, which is approximately 2 million shells, at the same time, all of western europe, which promised us in the 23rd year to give us a million shells, said that sorry, no we can, we will give the rest for next year, that is, you understand. the difference between the military potential of ukraine together with these chapels, as i say , interspersed aid, military aid, so it looks like interspersed, because well , conventionally, the western partners have more than 5,000 f-16 aircraft, the russians have 400 aircraft, so for western partners, 10% of such planes would not change the weather, but we, on the contrary , would destroy for these 10%... the second army of the world, which is primarily a threat , including them, let's speak frankly, that's why all these things are now about this we must speak and we must

explain to our western partners. that it is necessary to help ukraine today and already, because after the last ukrainian soldier falls, nato soldiers will begin to fall. first of all, the baltic countries understand this, the poles understand this, although in principle they calmly watch how the ukrainian economy is put 10-15 bunch of fringe pro-russian alleged demonstrators, in fact , these rallies have nothing to do with european values, and they perform the function of blocking, ukrainian vessels, russia does it from the sea, and polish carriers do it by land, slovakia joined them today, and impotence of our authorities in solving these problems, two have already died, today our transporters arranged, they started a hunger strike, of course, we came to them there, they solved some issues there, well, they supposedly stopped it now, but that doesn’t solve it the question is about the essence of the problem, these are point

-like things, the actions of our government in the foreign policy arena, so blaming only the western world for the fact that they do something slowly or do not complete it is necessary after dealing with their rascals and scoundrels who are actually sabotaging any good initiatives, by the way, i want to congratulate everyone in quotes, i apologize to the volunteers, but i want to note to all my comrades on the front lines that the volunteer movement today faced a cancer in front of customs officials for ukraine, because the resolution of shmyhal and our the government has already begun to actually and physically block volunteer aid for the armed forces of ukraine, so what do we want from the western world? mr. major, president zelenskyi said today in an interview with ip that the war with russia is at a new stage, let's hear what zelenskyi said. we have a new phase of the war, and

this is a fact. war is complicated, winter in general is a new phase of war, or war, winter, it takes place not only on the front line, but also in the middle of cities, due to the large number of uses by the enemy, drones, due to the large number of missiles, including ballistics, etc., and that is why the winter war, it is difficult, mr. major, why did you enter a new phase of the war, in the office of the president, entered into a war with the industrious? well, let's be frank, you said it right, it was the president's office, not the president, that openly, namely yermak's office entered into an open confrontation with the tyrant, in the interests of which country this is being done, our counter-intelligence, the sbu, should be investigating this, of course, because the efforts

representatives of the presidential... faction of politicians, and i would say politicians, to get access to documents that are reported to the commander-in-chief, this can be done only in the interests of some foreign country, in particular the aggressor country, or, for example, to sow, so to speak, distrust among the soldiers in the top military leadership in the country, this can only be done thanks to active measures of informational and psychological operations for the benefit of the aggressor country, but the office of the president, which is actually today headed by a green cardinal, as yermak was called in the polls by the western partners, headed by a green cardinal, actually has all power, zelensky removed himself from state management, directly in personnel policy and in many things that he instructed the green cardinal yermak to do, well, like,

according to what powers... yermak goes to the media and says: i gave the order to the prime minister to the minister, it wasn't igor who said it, it's true, yermak said it, and therefore president zelenskyi recused himself from carrying out his, such powers, because the secretary cannot give instructions to the prime minister, but nevertheless, glorifying yermak, we understand that for sure in yermak after the uman meetings have a very serious compromising effect on president zelenskyi, since he is still giving more and more full... yermak, despite the decision of the national security and defense council and the statements of the secretary of the security council of our defense security council danilov, the state of ukraine must represent not some tourist in a striped swimsuit, but president zelenskyi, the prime minister, or kuleb, the minister of foreign affairs, may represent him, however, mr. yermak also took over the representation in our country, and he says all these things.