positively, another 21 have a neutral perception of the situation, five could not form their opinion. during the last month, international and ukrainian media have been writing about the alleged conflict between zaluzhny and zelenskyi. adding fuel to the fire are the statements of mp from the servant of the people, maryana bizugloi, who openly declares that the industrious must be released because the military leadership has no plans for war. well, at the press conference on the eve of the president, various journalists asked him several times about his possible conflict with zaluzhny, about his prospects. the dismissal of the chairman and whether maryana's position does not reflect the position of the president's office, listen to how the president answered all these questions, what is the purpose of helping someone and developing this topic, i have a working relationship with the hostage , he has to be responsible for the results on the battlefield as a commander, together with the general staff, there are many questions regarding maryana. and

they have several more people there, it is very difficult, they all like to comment, like, on facebook, they communicate there very often, in they are in dialogue, they are from the first days, then they go to the front together, then they quarrel, these are difficult questions, to be honest for me, that is why i told you, it seems to me that we all need to give results to the state every day, and we will have time for a selfie. what do you think about such rhetoric , you can leave your comments in the chat under this video, and our broadcast is joined by oleksiy garan, scientific scientific director of the ilko kucheriv democratic initiative foundation, professor of political science at the national university of kyiv-mohyla academy, good evening, good evening, by the way, i fully agree with the words of mr. kuzyk, it is absolutely fair, people need to be explained, a lot of military specialties.

which are not filled, which do not necessarily imply that you have to directly, well , go on an assault, gives a bunch of other military specialties, this should be clarified. the second point, which i would like to say right away , is what worries me, and just today exams, tomorrow exams with students, you know, sometimes you get the impression that there is a war somewhere there, people are fighting there, something is going on here normal life i think we need to think about how to involve everyone in what's going on, and we're talking about drone gatherings, well listen, well, many peaceful citizens can do this, and students, by the way, can do, yes, because students, as students , some study, some don't study, some go out there for themselves, it has to be done, some, some fight at the front, some collect drones, some sew camouflage, because yes, when the enemy stood... kyiv

, we were somehow united , everyone felt everything, everyone wanted to do something, and now somehow again the situation that existed after 2014 is a little repeated, that there is a war somewhere, and we are somehow persuading ourselves here, and we need to think about it. mr. professor, i will ask you as a professional political scientist, but this rhetoric of the president, maryan, valera, selfies, posts, what is behind such rhetoric, should it be attributed to this style of conversation, communication style of the president. yes without such without formally so communicate very, informally more precisely, is this such a conscious use of exactly such rhetoric, if so, then why, with which purpose? look, i have this approach now, because i am also bombarded by western journalists, every day i give an interview on the topic of the split between luzhnev and zelensky, so my position is that we must in every way... demonstrate our unity ,

moreover, we, well, objectively, look, i am a politician and there are military personnel, objectively they will have a difference in approaches, but we should not dramatize it and we should talk about the fact that, in general, if we united and moving forward, that is, i would not in any way want to boost and connect to the boost the atmosphere, if we analyze yes... polls, by the way, of the same commission, then we will publish ours next week at the end of the year. support than that of zelensky, respectively 62.88%, but 62% for the president of a warring country, this is also very high, and ...

any western politician would envy that, yes, so what's more, these kmis polls, they show that 59% approve... both of zelensky as commander-in-chief and of zuluzhny, as to the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. that's a good number. this means that only 1% of those who support zelensky do not support zaluzhnyi, and 14% of those who support zaluzhnyi do not support zelensky. that is, in general, this suggests that the population is not polarized here. and again, we shouldn't push it. going back... directly to your question, well, i would like to say that my general impression of the press conference, the president's press conference, so the first moment, it was not a hot tub, the questions were critical ones, yes, because we were afraid that they didn't let that in, they didn't let that in, that it would all

be staged, no, it wasn't, from the first question there were quite sharp, quite critical questions, that's a plus, the second, the conference.. . the president's answers were not wrong in general and he generally gave the right answers, but in several moments his reaction was too, let's say, emotional, in particular with regard to this question, i believe that this question should not have been answered in such a way , it was necessary to say: we are the only one, nobody, we may have differences in some approaches, but we are united and no one will be able

to write off the style of the president, the style of the president, his style, his emotionality and his trust in his team, because there were two more... but here is a bright , a portrait of a famous person , without whom, of course, we would not have received anything, neither air defense, nor so on, that is, there were two acute questions, from the ukrainian truth and from the mirror of the week, about the situation in his team, about whether mistakes and so on, we saw that the president responded, unfortunately, emotionally, and well, they were unsuccessful responses, as well as not quite successful. was the answer to that about , that is, when he said working relations, okay, but then, that's that, well, again, i want to put it down to the communication style of the president, that is, again, you understand, well,

objectively, we see numbers of support for zaluzhny, i.e. if zelenskyi now goes for aggravation, well, withdrawal, but i... i wanted this topic to be discussed at all, frankly, in our media, media space, then it will be a failure, first of all, for zelenskyi, and it has to realize both volodymyr oleksandrovich and him political technologies that surround him, so my advice would be to leave this topic and in every way say that we act on we act together, and well, as i said, it seems to me that this would be the right approach, of course, but here you... you mentioned the question that came from the ukrainian truth, from mykhailo tkach, he asked volodymyr zelenskyi, well , what to do with officials and deputies who use their official position for their own enrichment, and he asked the president, and what exactly the president can do to do in order to fire someone, punish

someone, replace someone so that this does not happen, and here i am, let's listen again, this is also, i agree with you, it was very important and an emotional response, and then we will continue the discussion regarding my team, if i get rid of my team, i have a small one, five or six managers, then we become weaker with you, there will be less air defense, there will be less help, with all due respect to your rhetoric, i cannot, i simply cannot allow this is what all government officials should be a moral example, unfortunately there is no such thing, here i agree with you, what can i do as the president, i cannot disband them. because then there will be elections, i cannot hold elections during the war, that is, i can only do them according to the legislation and i live according to the laws of ukraine, at least i do everything for this, maybe sometimes something does not work out, well, excuse me, what is it, well, you see, it looks like so that the president

does not see any problems in his team, is not going to fire or change anyone, and thanks to five or six managers, ukraine has air defense, aid and so on, well... to some extent , it's as if, you know, leveling the government, parliament and all other institutions, or am i wrong, well, yes, to me , well, again, you know, if i were preparing the president for these from. i would , of course, advise him to answer it differently , well, i don't know, yes, because he immediately turned the arrows on the deputies, yes, who deserve criticism, obviously, but even here i would say that listen, well, the question not that martial law, not only that martial law, that i cannot dissolve, there are three conditions for the constitutions under which the president can dissolve the parliament, i just asked the students today, name them. that's all, they are very limited these, these, cases, so, well

, here it is, this is just an example, here i had these three points, the answer to the up, the question of the up , the answer to the question of the mirror of the week, and the third is the one that has to do with the industrious, i think it was a failure, but look, again, what i want to do is to... howl, i want to emphasize that we, well, you, as journalists, and you invite us experts to discuss these or other issues, that is, we we are primarily looking for sensationalism, first of all, something that can be latched onto and submitted to. in general, i think that the press conference, it was not, was not correct, in general answered, other answers of the president, they were correct. yes, maybe in some places there was a lack of some kind of drive , the only such thing, you know, the message from this

press conference, that is, i believe that not everything is lost, yes, not everything is lost, i still hope for the weight of decisions, and here i am just i hope for pragmatism and precisely the fact that the president's team is different. people, let's talk like this right away, and if , let's say, well, volodymyr oleksandrovich trusts andriy borisovych very much, yes, yes, and he can't do without him, well, okay, yes, he really took over many, many functions, including in the field of international relations there, and this is the preparation of the summit on the peace formula, his international activity is very great, and his, if it were, activity... everyone here knows, i can say about it, because i returned from the pairs and from the south africa and from

mexico, where we discussed precisely the participation of these countries in these summits, preparations for this the peace summit, and yes, they know and are in contact with yermak, okay, okay, with all the criticism, but there are other people who, unfortunately, make mistakes, who concentrate on themselves, who concentrate on... themselves, public criticism, there are several, there are several surnames, well, we all know them, yes , that’s why i think that the president should know about it, and he knows, i hope, and based on the polls, and they also closely follow these polls, according to sociological ones, you have in mind, the eyes that we show, regarding trust, distrust, there involved, uh, and, well, not only to those involved, yes, that is, to... zelenskyi , yes, trust in zelenskyi has fallen, but again, when i comment on the west, i explain it,

well, to the international community in general, then i explain it, well, listen, this should not be surprising , there is a war, a difficult situation , yes, we had high expectations, again, due to the fact that someone promised us that we would overcome all this very quickly, that is why some ukrainians like to criticize the government, that is, i still try , if we were to lower these... and this degree, the degree of mutual criticism that we have, even in the conditions of martial law, even in the conditions of martial law, and i think that, look, there is a good example, yes, when i tried, the office of the president tried to promote the topic of early, early elections, and the president himself said that i was thinking about it, well 80 % of ukrainians said that we do not do this... 100 influential public organizations signed a statement against this, well

, the authorities were forced to react to this and say that no, there will be no elections, so this is very important, by the way, this is the question , which is often asked abroad, and why don't you have it elections, when you explain them, they say , well, everything is clear, because they think that this is a sign of undemocratic behavior there, and they do not know that it is exactly ukrainian civil society, they say that no, we do not need elections now, what. .. ukrainians are against the elections, so , thank god, they took into account here, here opinion, i thank you very much, i thank you very much, mr. professor oleksiy haran, and director of the democratic initiative foundation named after ilko kuchariv, professor of political science at the kyiv-mohyla academy , we talked about volodymyr zelenskyi's press conference, certainly, this is not just the top topic of yesterday, but the top topic of the week. thank you very much. well , that's the end, i'll remind you that the day before, radio svoboda

broadcasted volodymyr zelensky's press conference live from the beginning to the end, and after svoboda live you can do the same from the beginning. watch it until the end on radio svoboda's youtube channel, and also subscribe to our pages on social networks, we are on instagram, telegram, facebook, choose, leave comments in the chat under the broadcast, and svoboda live will be back on the air tomorrow. turn on well - it's when everything is as you want it to be. click and you are in the world of cartoons, click and around the world of cinema, then on the good, oh, what you need, megogo, turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports, there are discounts on molterenforte 20% in pharmacies psyllium, pam and oskad, plantain knows what helps, there was an accident, nina galamask,

your mother, mother, there are other relatives, no, but it seems you have a grandfather, we are flying near the tsuva carpathians. the washstand is behind the house, and the toilet is downstairs, where is it? and if there are no cigarettes, then what will you do, he says, well, if there are no cigarettes, then will smoke the rural council, how long do you need, it takes 10 days, that's what you should do , i didn't come here to look at the old farts who collect cones in the forest,

what will be your vaman, vakantse, vakantse, novels. i ask you to pray to god, i ask you to drink, and tomorrow fly to your sunny italy, mykola, don't spill blood on your wedding night, mykola, myhody!

there, there, come on, make a chair!

winter solo, commander of the third battery, artillery division, well, 71 yegerska. brigade of airborne assault troops, we have american m-101 howitzers, howitzers are old, but modified , reliable, they shoot well, they are very helpful in supporting our infantry, that is, i don’t even take into account, well, taking into account the fact that if the year of these howitzers is there... years, compared to the soviet ones that we had at the beginning of the war , then it's just heaven and earth. the howitzer showed itself excellently in its work. there are shortcomings, but they can be easily eliminated, one can say on the spot, and accordingly we work very accurately. in

terms of supporting our infantry, it happens, well, as a rule, we attach ourselves to some unit that works on the corresponding sector, and we perform the tasks that they directly give us in support of their attack or defense, the goals are different, of course. that basically , taking into account that the caliber of the gun is not very large, it is a force , the enemy’s fire means are there, the enemies are in shelters, well , we make an impression, according to the advance of our troops, or the defense, what actions the enemies are taking, we get a command , get the coordinates, get the target and make an impression, thanks to the accuracy. of this weapon we can we can make a fire impression on the enemy , well, in the immediate vicinity of our troops there, which we help the infantry a lot, that is

, we can hit the enemy when our troops are close to their lines, well, thanks to, well, it helps, as it were, faster advancement, faster performance of tasks, i.e. we made an impression on our e... immediately, well, our troops immediately moved forward and so gradually-gradually push the enemy out of our lands, i.e. gabyssa has proven herself very well, 105 caliber, well, as a rule, the second or third projectile already flies into the target, at the expense of this caliber for this bull's eye, well, it is enough, since we have been in the combat zone for more than six months, that is, in fact, for... there were no such problems with the delivery of bc , that is, we work constantly, there are no such hard limits at the moment, plus now

such a scheme is used, i won’t tell you in more detail how it all happens, but the point is that we get as close as possible to the front edge with our firing positions, eh, i.e mobile groups are created consisting of one or two guns and directly... the proximity to the front line allows us to make an impression more effectively, accordingly, we can hit targets further, the maximum range of this weapon is 11200, so we can, well, if we hit the enemy directly at zero, yes itself and impress his logistics, impress him, if the rear that. on average, if our artillery division had been participating in hostilities since february, our first

departure was the donets direction, directly avdiyivka, the whole spring was spent under avdiivka, in the hottest period of the armed presence, you can say, because at that time there were very strong attacks on this city, so for three months directly in that... they worked, performed firing tasks, then moved in the plan of our counter-offensive actions, our offensive actions in the direction of zaporozhye, we are already working here, at the beginning of the summer we worked in one sector, now we have moved to another, also the hottest sector in this counteroffensive, our offensive, we are completing the task, at the expense of our attack. which exert forces defense, yes, there is an opinion that it is going slowly, but taking into account the defense structures the enemy has built during this time, i

think that everything is going as it should go, because we protect the lives of our infantry, we protect the same fire means of impression, and well... we are moving, moving, especially the last month, the troops are going very well, actively, the first milestone has been passed, and everything will go faster from now on. he graduated from the sumy military institute of artillery, 1998-2002, but did not serve in the army, resigned. well, but already when the full-scale invasion began, on this, well, at the moment, well, at that moment i was in poland, if i had already settled my life there, i was planning to move my family. well, what happened happened on february 24, 2022 , the war started, i returned to ukraine, well , because i understood that there my knowledge acquired at

the institute would be needed a lot, and that's how i got into the war. for me, what was the motivation? i definitely, well, if i realized for myself, taking into account the events there from the 13th-14th year, and which continued, if it was not a full-scale war, but there was still a war. at that time could not accept in participation in this, well, if there was a family, three young children, but for myself i always understood that there would be a full-scale war and that it was a very long story, and that's why i... for myself , i internally postponed it, well, it would be later , there i will put my children on my feet and still go to fight, well, but it happened a little earlier, the plans changed, i did not have time to move the family to poland, and so i ended up in the war , they did not want to take me, i had to write, how to say it, that i am voluntarily going, i am voluntarily going to war, but my brothers did not want to go to that one

moment... well, the children were all minors, well , but after 8 months, the eldest daughter was already 18 years old, so if it is not relevant now. the family knows who i am, what i am like, so there were no questions, everyone understood that i would leave immediately from the first days. oh , i don't know, he doesn't want to, or he's afraid, or he doesn't know, well , it's a difficult question, i can't condemn these people, because war, if it's a terrible thing and you wouldn't wish anyone to go through it, but still. well , there is a moment, there is an influx, well, a cruel enemy, orcs, i don't know what to call them, well, we need this do, it is necessary, because it will be for a long time , the story is very long and unambiguous, well, everyone will be forced not to participate in this in one way or another, whether to fight at the front, or who does not have the opportunity due to their own moments, or family or for health, to work out.

volunteering, because without it there would be nothing at all, no matter how hard the state might try, no matter how much our partners help us there, that is, this whole cob depends on the people, at the expense of training and gaining some kind of military experience, so really, well as for my division of my battery, well, the main mass there, 70-80 percent, are people who have never faced a war before. combat operations, maybe someone somewhere once served in the army, well, because the main age of the unit is 40 there plus 50 plus, the main desire, you can learn everything, there is nothing difficult, desire, practice and everything will work out, well, at the expense of the fear that is there take the first step, you just need to overcome yourself, definitely, well, there is always support,

there is always... friends, combat buddies, team, i.e. try not to think about it , it's scary for everyone, that's for sure, it can't be that it's not scary, because if you're not scared, then it will definitely lead to death, but it's the same to drive these thoughts away from you, if you you think about work, about military self-improvement, well, these fears recede into the background, and you simply, simply do your work, the best work of all. for me it means victory, well, of course, it is, well, at the very least, it is going to the borders of 1991 in the plan of reconquering our lands of our country, well, the second is the maximum destruction of the enemy, just the maximum destruction of the enemy, well, i think only this would give the maximum victory in addition to the fact that we will go to the borders, that is, in addition to the fact that we need to strike them on our land, it is also necessary as much as possible to impress them and on their

land. what concerns their entire military infrastructure, which, well, so that it cannot bring evil in the future, well, let's say this, in our country, my opinion, at the expense of the enemy, he will not concede in any perspective, that is, only for destruction , to work for destruction, no agreements, to believe in nothing, only to take a strong position to conduct negotiations, or just as combat actions only for destruction. well, at the expense of all the skeptics who think there about slow movement or slow progress, or about some negative, future prospects, everything will be fine, we work for victory every day, there is still enough enthusiasm, because the main thing is that the shells do not reduce the shells, so that then everything continued as it was and everything will be fine, we are destroying the enemy.