i welcome you to the broadcast of the television channel, studio zahid program, we will analyze the most important events of this week, the most important economic and geopolitical signals that our state received from various capitals. our guests today are mark fagin and daniel frith. now on the air. will work mark fegin, a figure of the russian position on emigration, former deputy of the state duma, video blogger. glory to ukraine, mark, i congratulate you. i am glad to welcome all viewers. well, alarming signals are coming, in particular, it is about the appearance of many different publications with a certain leitmotif. yes, we are we understand, there may be nothing behind them, but the appearance of this leitmotif is extremely stressful. they write: what will happen, for example, to europe, the world economy, and so on, if ukraine loses? and here the key story is not that

someone can question it, yes, but in general that at this historical moment, the issue of allocating funds for stabilization, the issue of allocating ammunition, and so on, someone is regularly pumping this matter, you know how, certainly on in the west we see that some group has formed, there it is different, that in america, that in europe a stable group of insiders who... in general are trying to change events in favor of, say, a greater compromise with moscow, will allow this compromise, yes, because at our expense, at ukrainian expense, certainly, of course, that is how is this, in principle, the whole situation looks like in america with disputes over the allocation of these 60 billions, although there is not only money from ukraine, but also from israel and taiwan, to a much lesser extent, but none the less. with mexican

borders, i am asking how it is weighed on the scales, that is, ukraine began to be manipulated in solving its internal issues, namely to manipulate, realizing that one part of the government, there are the same democrats, and they, by the way, are very heterogeneous , depends on even relative success on the front in ukraine, in general, the situation related to ukraine, the preservation of its sovereignty, protection from aggression, and so on, in order to solve their problems, and in general, it is appropriate to solve such problems at the moment...

on this help, will be accepted in principle the decision on the allocation of funds, but you understand how the background is very bad, and what will happen next time, that is, the war does not tolerate pauses, does not tolerate breaks, lunches, christmas holidays, the war continues every day, well, i would say that there is a group of parasites of this type of realpolitik or isolationists, if we are talking about american politics, who use this situation as an agreement to solve their own problems, by the way, they are not only interested in trump winning the elections, there are also their own. there will be elections, they need, so to speak, and the support of voters during their elections, and they are mostly trumpists, you see, if we say republicans, as for the wing of the inner-democratic party, then it is stable, this is everything that goes against the policies, let's say, that are carried out by the american leadership, regardless, republican , democratic including, at least the support of israel, at least the support of ukraine, everything is bad, this is a liberal left, such a left wing, extreme left wing, well, in essence, the left is liberal, but it is left.

consists of something that generally appeals or parasitizing, if you will, on moods, like, why does ukraine pay us so much money, yes, why do we support it in the war, why do we need taxpayer money? spends in advance on such a hopeless business that is completely hopeless, let’s better let them come to an agreement, but not at our expense, but at their own expense, approximately such sentiments contribute very much to this, of course, if the objective fatigue is from wars, fatigue from the fact that the markets are feverish , there are refugees from ukraine, of course, this is also the case, yes, but even there will soon be 2 years into the war already 2 years, this is a protracted war by any standards, remember how azerbaijan and armenia quickly got along, there are two wars, just strive. it is possible that the story is not only about elections and money, well, at one time, in principle , the situation was outlined quite well by the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine

valery zaluzhnyi, as he said, well, in general , in order to win in such wars, it is necessary to increase the nomenclature and the number of this nomenclature, well, without aviation.

he was not wasted and even nuclear if the weapons were not given, then there would be no war, but how to fight? therefore, naturally, of course, this is all trouble, but it is difficult to address them, at least to zelensky, at least to zulazhny, at least to whomever it is, well, it is somehow difficult, it is clear that this is the same ukraine, and the ukraine that was under yanukovych and ukraine the current ukraine is the same, but the politicians are different , you see, that’s why these accusations look like transferring from a sick head to a healthy one, because in the conditions of chaos, this is the war, this is the direct fire of this... discussions about what was done not so many years ago, or what needs to be done right now, but not at the expense of western aid, but at the expense of ukraine itself, such a thing is not very grateful, the point is that it is still the west he himself signed all these deliveries, that of airplanes, that of long-range

missiles, he also declared this, i remember all these ramsteins, on which all this was declared, supported, fixed, it was said that of course this must be done, this everything, everything, it's like... well , it's fair, everything is understandable, yes, that's what's needed here they will get it, here they will dial and so on , and what happens now, these obligations have not been fulfilled, but the prospect of their fulfillment can be well determined, yes, but, but not in time, again, and what kind of strategy is being prepared, here we are too we don't understand, he is gaining in numbers, so that they are not given weapons, so that they simply have masses again, that they want to fight, we reproached moscow for this, they said that moscow fights with meat against iron. why would ukraine repeat this tactic on the one hand, although again, well, the military is needed there mobilization is necessary, but it is necessary to report that without weapons, this is absolutely without what the western allies who have undertaken to do this can convey, this is all meaningless, it will not give the desired effect, again, what kind of war, let's

say, will there be plans in the twenty-fourth year in ukraine, in the armed forces, to deoccupy these 20%, well, there probably will be, but the main focus should be on... ensuring the defense of the already protected territories of 80%, everyone is talking about this, it is fair, it is necessary to create such defensive ones constructions, as moscow did in zaporizhzhia, there are three lines of defense, minefields, good tactics, they worked, so why not use them in order to protect ukraine, at least from a possible change in the situation on the front of offensive requests from the occupying forces troops of their territory , these 80%, because the question is still the same, and for once...

it is read in certain offices in the west, it is also read in the kremlin, well , what are they waiting for in the kremlin, that is, the key story is yes, the introduction of the so-called split elites and manipulation on this and accordingly... in i would like to talk about the strategic plans of my strategic plans, by the way, also from the side of the kremlin, that is, on the one hand, putin also told various fables for a long time and boringly during his so-called concluding new year's line, so we understand that he lied from the tribox, on the other hand we understand that he is seriously preparing for a long scenario, that is , he did not deviate from the course either, you know, putin was inspired by the course of events this year,

he can conduct the election as he wants, he can continue to spend this resource is dangerous for him, perhaps, gathering russian commoners, sending them to the front in avdeevka , where they die by the thousands, you know, this is a little man who could, under certain circumstances, show his dissatisfaction, and so, you know, they spent, the next ones went, that is, a lot what useful things does he get out of the war, so, of course, everything that was done will be done, but there will also be a lot of new things, but putin's stake is still political. on changes in the political decisions of the new leadership, if it comes to power in the united states

in the states, that is, everyone is waiting for the november elections , whether trump will come or whether biden will remain there, which is already becoming less likely, some tactic or strategy of the kremlin is already oriented towards this, it may, they may be deceived on this account, they may well there may be an inadequate assessment of the situation in this sense, but nevertheless they report that the situation can change for their benefit. although to be honest, always when they relied on political changes, these changes deceived them in their expectations, you see, that is in ukraine, every new president they hoped for, well, in particular , zelensky, he did not live up to their expectations, to put it mildly, so the same can be said about every new administration in america, because trump, who from 16 to 20 held a position in the avalan cabinet, it would seem, rhetorically indeed...

that, perhaps, he is mistaken in his expectations, putin, hoping for a protracted war before the results of the elections in the usa, they can greatly disappoint him. well, on the other hand, he managed to conquer the so-called order day inside russia, mark, you very correctly noted that, in principle, fascism was successful, certain mobilization processes are ongoing, a man is dying near avdiivka and there is no end in sight, i think this is the main thing that putin wanted to demonstrate to... the western audience, i.e. western generals, they are not used to perceiving war as a meat grinder, which

you can throw 10, 20, 30, 50 thousand personnel, take prisoners, scroll them to mincemeat and on and on, and after that, well, behind the scenes, what applause , putin certainly parasitizes on the lack of responsibility for the death of dozens, and even hundreds of thousands of military personnel whom he sends, and he has nothing in russia in general... except for this sporadic indignation of such a minimum on the part of the relatives of these mobilized people, they gave him the wrong color, and there was a refrigerator for small, yes, yes, in general, there is nothing, and he uses it to the maximum, even zaluzhny himself wrote in his article in the economist, well, we said that we did not expect that it is possible to spend 150 thousand, nothing, i myself, he speaks in vdeevsk the direction was observed, he remembers what he writes there.

the resource is infinite, unlike ukraine, and he is afraid of it, that he has a different mobilization approach, ukraine does not proceed from the fact that as many people as possible will be digested in this meat factory, and putin does not have such restrictions, you see, and this certainly makes an impression , even on the ukrainian side, what are you talking about in the west? the west is shocked, to say the least, because when the american side declares that in a month the russian armed forces lost 15,000 soldiers under avdeevkoy, well, you can imagine how... imagination, considering that for each soldier there, in general, the responsibility is incredible , and they protect their war victims, nobody wants 15.00 people there per month, that is , for them it is incredible, but for putin it is strong side, you know, the strong side , everything else is in anabiosis, look, even

the oligarchs as an element that he doesn't like, of course war, and they don't want this war, they only lose from it, but nevertheless they covered everything up. you mentioned that you need to send strong powerful signals, so about the unity of the elites, well, like it, don't like it, everything must remain, everything , so to speak, the internal kitchen must remain within the limits of the situation rooms, that is, it cannot be tolerated, it must be demonstrated that the readiness to go through a long, bloody cycle, so we do not know approximately with what resources. will be ready, so to speak, to intensify offensive actions, that is, we do not know whether he will have enough living or technical resources, but at least we see the process of involving russian society in the full length of the war, accordingly, ukraine also has i am currently building several very important cases, and i would actually like to talk about them with you. as for

ukraine's strategy in general, it is certainly important for ukraine to demonstrate some successes in order to show the west. the basis in internal affairs comes from this resource of victory, because in the west it is very important, especially in america, to demonstrate even a small but success, that everything is not in vain, you see, it is not necessary only success on the fronts, yes, that is it is not necessary only there the conversion of the weapons received and financial means for military victories, this is also such a relative thing, but in any case , what ukraine is doing today is the maximum possible. it is necessary to understand that if it is possible to disrupt the elections, if it is possible to continue some actions in relation to russia and its territory, this would be a great help in various issues, despite the indignation of the west, so to speak, in russia there will not be an internal headache that can will arise from the raids on belgorod, from some operational actions

carried out by the ukrainian special services, then in the kremlin and no worries and no troubles, you see, and we are nothing. why are they nervous about what, if everything is good, but the front is somewhere, it is far away, it does not affect putin in any way, but it is necessary to continue the tactics, throw the war back into the russian federation, so that the population there too experiences immediate problems are also the reason for this, and not only the fact that relatives are being killed and there are numbers of mobilized people and so on, this tactic is important, well, plus look, here are now the so-called elections in russia 17 marta, it is necessary to achieve their delegitimization. it is necessary for the west to say its word that we do not recognize putin as the president -elect, he is a war criminal, i do not know, he is being prosecuted by the international criminal court, and this means that if he is an illegal illegitimate president, then it is necessary from all organizations, including to the united nations, yes, i mean the representative office there that implements

russia, as the country of the founders or the president. that's it and his choices, too, you need to somehow round it all in general to the side in which there will be no chance for any return. legitimate field. putin is very concerned about this. this is his last visit to the arab emirates and saudi arabia, he was called precisely to break this blockade of his order mus, at least with the global south. well, china is a separate story there, of course, it can be found in china. it is painful for him. this is very important. yesterday, for example, macron said that, in response to a journalist's question, putin may

be invited to normandy for the eightieth anniversary, but of course, if certain conditions. it is clear that under these conditions means the end of the war. er, that means compliance with all the requirements that are imposed on him, it is clear that he will not do this, but the very nature of such an assumption by macron, yes, that in principle putin can come, well, i understand that they are trying to deceive putin, they understand that nobody invites him anywhere, but this is a rhetorical game so that, listen, putin, you can get rid of both the warrant and the sanctions, well, you have to give in, you have to return the captured territory to ukraine, i understand, macron did not just make such a throw, that is, it is a signal, well, a key story. how will the recipient of this signal react, yes, that is, what is the scale of value there, well, a person who i do not know has already put it in avdiyivka, well, it will be exchanged for some such...

it is the right, therefore, the right to decide the fate of ukraine, there is something else, he is one of those people who does not put his finger in his mouth, you know, he will bite, i think that this is definitely a big omission, but again, i understand the review, why these statements sound, and because all of a sudden trump will come and we extremes will stay here, one on one with this comrade, and trump declares, let's increase the nato budget there and we are not going to fight for you at all, but in this situation they are asking, that is, to prevent this potential threat somehow. will be pushed aside so that, well , god forbid, it is not enough, so this is also a very awkward position in all respects. mark, according to the installation, in your opinion, the driving force is internal, that is, it is some kind of

individual psychedelics, or is it putin’s conscious desire to fascism normally and enter the third world war, so to speak, the third world war from vladivostok to lisbon, well, at least on the european continent, especially taking into account the prospect of trump's arrival. to power and a certain isolationism, or putin, so to speak, is trying to bluff, bankroll, and what will be, will be, that's how we thought that he was somehow bluffing with ukraine, that's what we also thought, until a certain moment , well, i understood that after the fourteenth year i no longer had any illusions, i always said that he would attack, but in the fourteenth year, for example, i did not i expected that he would seize crimea, for example, but i didn't expect it, when i commented on it, i said that it was complete madness, because it didn't fit in my head.

on immigration, a former member of the state duma and a well-known blogger. oh, there are no potatoes, you can bring them , but my son, something has caught him. i remind you, put on dr. tice's vitiligo and get back to work. have comfrey, a german ointment for pain in the joints and muscles. liver bone restores movement from pain in joints and muscles natural father with live bone from dr. thais. try also the warming cream with comfrey dr. tice. proven tool.

daniel fried, the former coordinator of sanctions policy at the united states department of state, a man who knows, will be on the air now. about american domestic and foreign policy, if not everything, then almost everything. i welcome you, mr. ambassador, to the studio of espresso tv. congratulations. extremely important story, the news came from the state of colorado. the local court gave ukraine and not only ukraine a chance, yes, donald trump may not get into the american election race. when we read the signals from donald trump, we understand that this can directly affect the containment of russian aggression against ukraine. it is a shame that the world does not see the best side of american strategic thinking these days. donald trump represents the so-called america above

all school, that is, the school of thought of the 1930s, when the united states had no real interest in european security. it was a disastrous policy. it is not about the policy of the united states government, which was then headed by franklin roosevelt, but about the mood of congress. which prevented roosevelt from doing more in the fight against hitler. the disaster was that the second world war started and the west needed stalin to defeat hitler. it was catastrophic for poland, for ukraine, for europe and for the united states. so trump represents this bad tradition, which i will be very clear about, as well as my disagreements with former president trump. you asked about... the decision in colorado is an unprecedented case in american history because in the united states yet there has never been a president who made an effort to cancel an election and participated.

in the rebellion against the political transfer of power. we didn't have this before. section 14 of the constitution states that no agent of the government of the united states who engages in sedition against the government of the united states shall hold any office. this amendment was passed after the civil war to prevent former confederates from serving in the united states government or congress. once it was applied, but to a candidate in presidents never the colorado supreme court ruled that trump was involved in rebellion against the united states. he also concluded that under section three of the 14th amendment, trump is ineligible to become president, and thus ineligible to appear on the ballot. the other side's arguments could be either that

trump was not involved in...which is a difficult position because we've all seen the opposite, or that he wasn't convicted of supporting or leading an insurgency, so the 14th the amendment will not be applied, it will already be a legal question that the supreme court of the united states will step into, and i actually expect them to not uphold the colorado supreme court's decision, and probably determine that trump is in the right one way or the other. this will be hotly debated, but in my opinion, trump will still be the presidential candidate. i'm not saying this as a trump supporter. i'm trying to give you an idea of ​​how things might play out. of course, i could be wrong, but that's my initial view. i would ask you to analyze the possible ones now scenarios of the development of events related to the allocation of a package to ukraine and the state of israel.

macroeconomic assistance, we understand how much ukraine will depend on the receipt of those tranches, and in general, whether the administration of president joseph biden is in a position to convince a part of the republicans through large intra-american budget negotiations. the secretary of state, antony blinken, said that if anything there is an option b. that's another case i don't want to talk about. the united states should have provided ukraine with an additional one a long time ago economic assistance. i wouldn't say it's been blocked, rather it's been delayed because of the debate in congress over the security of the southern border. republicans in congress say a deal on the southern border is needed so that money for securing the southern border is allocated along with money for israel and ukraine. the current united

states senate is in intense negotiations. in search of a solution to the problem of the southern corridor, which opens the way to financing ukraine. so far, such a solution has not been found, but the negotiations seem to be quite serious. i think that eventually a solution will be reached and aid will be provided to ukraine, but i cannot guarantee it. so we have an unfortunate case where american and european policies hinder both the eu and the united states. provide financial assistance that we must provide. in the european union, the problem is that hungary, represented by viktor orbán, is blocking decision-making for no good reason. while the republicans in the united states insist on solving the southern border issue before they agree to help ukraine. not the best moment, neither for the united states nor for europe, but i

think we will succeed in the united states. find a solution and help ukraine.