at the time of the school, when the ukrainian army was withdrawing, the thing that shagolkova definitely suffered was her head. now she accepts humanitarian aid from the russian federation, thanks stroya for the restoration of infrastructure and tells the students of the school a completely different story of the heroic city of happiness. under the leadership of the director stocholkova , other collaborators shined. our next seller works in the same school number 56. this is lyubov ivanivna korshyk, born in 1959 on... until february 24, she was a teacher of junior classes at school number 56, but with pro-ukrainian views according to locals , she had been a supporter of the russian peace since the 14th year, so after the occupation of khushsheti , she stopped hiding her true views, started thanking the russian soldiers and asked them to return alive from the so-called svo. soldiers, we are so worried about the events that are happening now in our country, we believe in... victory, that you will return

alive and healthy, we pray for you, the understanding of all soldiers of the svo, for your victory, so that people understand who our real enemy, we pray for your health, soul salvation. her the daughter, a well-known blogger in ukraine, eva korshyk, told in her interview how she and her mother had an affair in the 14th year, i had hysterics, mother, let's go, i dreamed of leaving because... i mother begged, mother with such a consciousness, she cannot, and father and mother were already divorced, she could not imagine how she would change her life. eva left happiness, and her mother stayed. and as we can see, despite the horrors of the war that russia started, lyubov korshik supports the russian boys. i want to say, hope in vain your little soldiers will come back to you in black garbage bags and no prayers will help. and finally, i will tell you about the evil flea. you didn't hear me. this is the case

when the surname fully describes the nature of a person. kateryna blokha was born in 1994 in the city of svatov, luhansk region. until february 24 , she worked as a saleswoman in a store, when the city was captured, the girl's social status rose. for the love of all things russian , the rashists allowed her to work in the cultural center. now this saleswoman in a t-shirt with the russian flag entertains the arshi audience and sings about how cool it is to be an orc. in addition to howling, the bad girl was distinguished by the fact that she distributed propaganda newspapers during the illegal referendum, thanking the russian army for her liberation. i feel that i will jump soon.

a flea from our armed forces somewhere in bolot, but even there the parasites should not feel safe, so it is better to surrender and serve 10 years in a ukrainian prison, you will be healthier. it was the program collaborators and i, olena kononenko. if you have information about the kremlin sellers, write to us at this email address or simply on facebook, together let's send all the traitors after the russian ship. see you in a week on espresso. turn on the good - this is when everything is as you want, click and you are in the world of cartoons, click and the world of cinema is around, then on the good, oh, what is needed, meggogo, turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports, wow, i went for a walk, water, ordinary water is not enough here, drink it. rheo. i'm

saving myself. rheo. you're ready, my dear, you're ready. took reo. reo - water for special medical purposes. i welcome you, on radio svoboda, today oleksandr kornienko, the first deputy chairman verkhovna rada of ukraine, good day, good day, don't give me no, i am not sure that he is good, well, when we are writing this program, yes, ukraine is under attack again, i think that many ukrainians are simply used to the fact that this is the case the day begins, you know, today's scale somehow he... reminded

the worst of some such memories, raised people, i see people like this on social networks, many mention the 24th actually, i will start our conversation about mobilization this week. in the verkhovna rada, has already appeared on the website of the verkhovna rada the mobilization bill, and it has caused a lot of debate in the community because it involves restricting the rights of people who evade mobilization, or will you support it as it is now? er, i will be unoriginal here and stand in solidarity with the president with stefanchuk, the chairman. of the verkhovna rada, it must be discussed on the basis of the committee, it will be logical, because the committee still has to make some kind of decision and discuss it with the participation of at least three of the most important stakeholders of this draft law, these are the military, this is the general staff, that is, we heard their positions were different, and they all

, one way or another, did not object either to the number or to the need for people for the war, yes. then it is necessary to discuss exactly how they see it, because the system of recruiting, recruitment of people is now managed by the general staff, the ground forces, as you said, the three main stakes, yes the military , the military, the military, the second is a fairly broad group, this we see it as representatives of specialized committees, but this is what is meant, for example, we discuss the topic of people from restrictions, which are proposed to be called more broadly with functional ones. restrictions , what are the disabled persons of the third group, for example, we need to invite doctors, in our country it is the national health committee, we need to invite the social policy committee, we have it in a tertiary way, to discuss how many such people, how many such diagnoses, can the vlk do all this through to miss myself, how will it all turn out, well, because these are very serious

issues, perhaps we should abandon these categories, and of course it is the ministry of finance, because we have seen very disturbing things in the last two days the news from their side, and their assessment, it is... such a scale raises the question of whether we can support it with taxes, i want to remind you that our army is financed exclusively by taxes in ukraine, and it is clear that we cannot multiply to raise taxes tenfold, well, it is impossible, there are simply no such people with the money to pay such taxes, therefore , of course, there will be a huge question regarding the provision of this mobilization with financial resources, therefore, answering my question, will you support this law, in which it yes, you are not yet ready to say, you will be, i am not ready to say what the final version will be, my prediction is that there will be some kind of compromise version, i don't know what the compromises will be around, but it will definitely be different from what the government has introduced, it will probably be some kind

of committee version, so-called, where several alternative bills are taken and a joint revision is made, and it can probably go to the first reading in the hall, but... the second reading will still have corrections, that is, what will then be signed by the president, it can definitely differ from what the government introduced and what do you think about restrictions on the rights of citizens, in this version of the draft law that is currently in place, do you support these restrictions ? mobilization, for the time being you support these restrictions, i think that they are also needed separately. consider, here i would rely on the opinion of people who work more with law, with constitutional law, constitutional lawyers say that they, that these norms limit rights of citizens, during martial law , the state can restrict certain rights, and we did so on february 24 in the law

on in the votes on the introduction of decrees on martial law, but here yesterday we heard the position of , for example, the ombudsman and i... relied more on opinion of specialized communities, we must also never forget that any strong restrictions in our society, in our legal culture, as a rule, lead to two things: either to corruption, or to ways of circumventing these restrictions, so, for example, i the position seems to be that the management of these restrictions, it will be only in the hands of the military committees. because it is written there now that it is all done according to the idea of ​​the tsc, yes, roughly speaking, they can create a register of debtors in the bank, enter the register of debtors, then send the bank there or back, it seems to me that this is such a big risk for some hands

just to collect something, it doesn't matter whose hands these are, i don't care about the file right now, they also do their work normally, most of them, except for borisov and others there. which we have seen, but simply concentrating something in one hand is such a no-no a very good story, a separate one, of course, if you superimpose this law on... the government project and this matrix of finance issues, it turns out that with certain actions proposed in the government draft law, we can reduce the amount of taxes, and then it turns out that here we solve one problem, as if we increase the number of those who can be drafted and reduce the number of evaders, as you say, and on the other hand, we reduce the tax base, because people there will go into the shadows because of this, because of this, and these people because of this and... and then we do not solve the problem as a whole, because in us, if minus on plus gives us a minus

inside there, well, the leadership of the parliament and ruslan stefanchuk, and we inside there , we definitely say that it is necessary for this to be a broad discussion, no, i don't know if it should be public, because there is there are a lot of issues of both the dsc and military secrecy, but some part can be public, but the committee must report on a daily basis that he, he held some meeting. yes, he should come out and tell people, i am very conditional now, for example, the doctors said that calling up disabled people of the third group is not a very good idea, because there is one, two, three, yes, and now let's all decide how we deal with this further, the first, on the first day when this draft law came out, we really wanted to listen to the deputies about the pro-presidential of political power, but the deputies received recommendations from the servant of the people, recommendations to refrain from any comments. because this is a very sensitive, sensitive issue, why did deputies receive such

recommendations from the servant of the people? i understand that i did not receive recommendations from above a recommendation, maybe because i am not a deputy from a servant of the people, i am non-factional, i don't know what it could be related to, but you did not receive such a recommendation, you would not have been told to keep quiet until the military came out for a press conference, yes, it can't be like that. uh, well, no, no, there can’t be such a recommendation to deputies, we still saw it even for the first time, well, because a deputy is free, i have doubts that deputies are free people, free, free, believe me, when you need to be free, eh, we even saw the first hours there there were some comments from someone, from the servants of the people, and yesterday, the day before yesterday, we were there, yehor cherniv comments on a whole podcast for 50 minutes, well , he comments less on the law, there is more. about nato, but, well, when already, when already, when valery zaluzhnyi already came out with a comment,

then, of course, the deputies also started to comment, why do you think such an important bill was not presented by the president himself, as the supreme commander, and why should it be presented by the president, the president can choose what to present to him and what not to present, firstly, secondly, we have of the law, it seems to be about regulations, or i don't remember, the president introduces only a very small number of draft laws, that is , he necessarily introduces ratifications and decrees for approval in the country of war and he is the supreme commander, shouldn't he have introduced this draft law or at least communicated it, well, look at this position, i read it on facebook of a political party. i'm not sure that many, well, many or not,

we can there, it can be said by someone there the survey is representative, i saw that this is a more political position, i think that the bill was introduced by the government because it is a product of the military, the ministry of defense together, and this is the government, the ministry of defense is part of the government, the president expressed his opinion on this in that the same day, and he clearly gave, if it were understood , that he was in favor of this draft law being well worked out in the committee, finalized so that the discussions were somehow successfully conducted, but if the military needs it, then of course it is for defense capability, in this moment, we should all also need it, i think it's not necessary... it's like that too, let's say it, there is

such a thing, there is such an opinion, there are such assumptions that volodymyr zelenskyy did not come out specifically to present this bill because it is very unpopular the draft law, although very necessary, but if it came out, it would have hit his political ratings very hard, and that is why he held back and valeriy came to the front stage, so to speak. is it true, well, for two years we have heard a lot of different things about the rating of the president, and then polls show that he still has 70% confidence there, i think that here, well... one of the answers to your question, that the president may not be afraid of unpopular things, he said, by the way, at the press conference , he said, enough unpopular things, as far as i'm concerned , and i think that during the war , the commander-in-chief and the chief diplomat of the country should do what the president does, well 100%, he does everything for

victory both in the military and in between. dear diplomats, well, it is difficult to blame these amounts of aid and those solutions there, with the help of which there are problems, you know, on next year, it negates the previous 270 billion, no, it doesn't, i'm just stating that at the end of the year there are big problems with a small part of aid from one country, but at the same time there are no problems with most of the aid from all other countries, well here well, let's take a comprehensive look at what was done and what the results were. are you talking about the united states? yes, it is in the overall balance, probably a third or a fourth part, something like that. yes, this money is needed, it will be very difficult without it, and it will be about, uh, i wouldn't

dramatized, as yesterday, about teachers and so on, we will probably still have this resource. internal, but some things are connected there with the same expenses for the public sector, it will probably be possible to reduce them even more, although we have reduced them very much, but the key is the continuation of stable implementation, for example, of imf programs, and these are precisely the laws , which we are voting on, which the government is bringing in , you mentioned teachers, this... was the statement of the minister of economy that if there is no help by march, there is a risk that people will be left without salaries and pensions, i think that's what she said. i have one last question about mobilisation, i will bring up a point that i thought really benefited from the great popularity on facebook, there were a lot of comments and posts. ihor lutsenko

, a people's deputy of the previous convocation, he is now a military serviceman, and he addressed the people's deputies, and he said that soon... you will have a choice, you will be forced to vote or not to vote for the bill on mobilization, whether you want it or not want, but as a result of this decision , a large part of people will go to the front and to it is a great pity that one of these people will die, and he said that he proposed that from each faction 10% of men could go to the front, choose by lot or voluntarily, it does not matter for six months, but not for staff positions, in the fields: aerial reconnaissance, sniper , drivers. what do you think of this idea? well, i understand that the issue of the deputies having to serve there in the trenches, yes, as i divided it for myself into two such big, two big extremes in this issue, one extreme consists in the fact that a non-working, inefficient parliament

- this is russia's dream, this is russia's dream, because as soon as the ukrainian parliament stops voting, the whole euro is covered. integration, because technically 90% of the component of european integration is voting, but a decision requires 226 votes, or 300, a constitutional majority, there are more than 400 people in the parliament, if the parliament gradually loses deputies, then sooner or later it will reach the 300 mark there , and this, well, if it does not meet the criteria for joining the eu, nato and so on, this is one extreme, another extreme, why do people want that. for us to go to the front, because deputies, unfortunately, during the war, not all of them show decent behavior, not that there is a deputy, but just a person, it then raises many questions, and it is possible, it is possible to appeal to this in society, and i understand there is a position that all these deputies should be sent somewhere, uh,

technically about 10%, probably ihor lutsenko, whom i respect very much, proposed some... compromising story, like, not to send all of them, yes, to keep the capacity of the parliament, er, to actually send 40 people, yes, er, well, if 10% of the parliament, if 10% men are 30 people, because there are 80 women in the parliament at the moment, and then there are a number of such organizational and ethical issues, whether everyone should be invited or given the same deferments that exist in life, so that it is fair, well, for example, i understand you, you a father of many children, for example, someone is disabled, someone else is there, although i am there, i do not shy away from this, what to do with the presidium is a separate issue, which they can fulfill there according to the constitution. duties of each other, yes, a separate issue is huge, regarding the fact that we have no legal grounds to do this, because

deputy, well, probably, in the law on martial law and on military obligation, we can remove the postponement, but i am not sure that the constitution will allow it, and in all this, yes, we need to look for an answer somewhere, i think that the answer and... it should also be with the fact that somehow, i don’t know how to achieve this, but this is a request for the deputies to give less reasons to consider them as someone bad, yes, this request definitely exists in society, it is about cases on rampant suspicions, of which there were several there only recently, during the war, these are different investigations, of which there are many. they are not all fair, but there are, well, where there is evidence, these are declarations, and there, for example, which deputies submit a little at a time, but this is on the other

hand, for example, and the issue of, well, political struggle during the war, i think that this is also such a question, enough, no, not black and white, it gives, not the fact that it gives minuses only to each other's opponents, yes, it is still on... for sure, i give minuses to all of us, as an institution, as, as organizations, well, you understand what the question is, here the question is what if you you make such important decisions and in fact , as a result of such decisions, huge ones , hundreds of thousands of people will go to the front, then friends, maybe a small percentage of you will go, maybe that would be fair, because everyone sees justice differently, but as i understand it , this is one of the options for achieving this justice. well, if, how can i say, on the other hand, if

it gives someone some, i don’t know, satisfaction that the deputies there will die in the trenches there, well, surely someone there can see it that way, think that way, i don’t delivers the pleasure of hearing that my loved ones are dying there, acquaintances there and so on, or there... when i go to the brigades there, with whom i help, they tell some cases, it does not bring me any, it is about some kind of satisfaction, come on they will all go, die and we will all be there and something will happen, that justice, will everyone be happy, will we win, will we win the war, about what, how will a battalion of 200 deputies help us win the war, let's talk more , who will not vote at this time. and we will not advance on other goals, then let's talk about promotion for other goals, and what is called, and you already mentioned, we already mentioned with you about help,

about what difficulties can be, like this one, if this help is not received on time, last week the supreme the council voted for the appointment of four members of the accounting chamber, you voted for, for our audience, i will say that the accounting chamber is a body that monitors the effective use of public funds. money the state budget of ukraine consists of more than 60% of international aid. international partners demanded, the ambassadors of the big seven countries wrote posts in black and white on twitter that ukrainians, please reform the accounting chamber, and then appoint the chairman and members of the accounting chamber to it. they can be understood if the budget of ukraine consists of their money. they want to see how efficiently this money is used. what does the verkhovna rada do? the verkhovna rada does not carry out the reform. accounting office and simply appoints four members there without any contests, and you vote for, as my colleague yuriy said nikolov, an investigative journalist who

knows these moments very well, he said: the people's deputies just took it and snarled in the face of our partners, why did you do it? well, yuriy can evaluate our performance as he likes, look, the next seven members will be by competition, why did you appoint these four without a competition? the next seven members will be by competition under the new law and the majority will be, as you say, with the influence of internationals. we appointed because the competition was over, and it was necessary to appoint, and it was impossible not to finish it, myself the competition was transparent, there were transparent interviews, you can watch it all on youtube , it’s all there, moreover, there are people who are representatives of these four people there, for example, who worked on the side of the partners from yuseidu, and there are no questions that you don’t know why you did not listen to the recommendation of the g7 countries and did not first carry out the reform, and then you would have made it

transparent. these people were appointed in competitions, why did it have to end, and now these four were appointed without a competition? well, i already gave the answer, because the contest is over, i have to was to finish the competition, appoint people , the time for the competition has passed, why are these people there, the members of the accounting chamber perform their function, i read, they count, as you say, if they were not there, the accounting chamber would stop, it would be paralyzed, there the drain is flowing the term of office of many members already expires. well, it seems that at the end of january or in february, well, until february, it seems, until march, or until february, until march, until march, it was possible to make a reform, start it, approve the agreement, i am sure that lawless people will become lawless so quickly voted, there are many discussions about it, that is, you, the first deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada, are fully aware that the ambassadors demanded in ukraine not to do this, you were fully aware of this and

did everything differently, i... think that in general, the problem is not so much as it is demonized, because the majority of the members of the accounting board will be through a fair competition, which they think they have with foreign experts, with the formation of a commission, in another way, well, now there was no commission, but the committee itself conducted it , that's how the committee conducted the competition, of course, but oh well secretary tsabal volodymyr was in charge of this, well , if there is a question about his integrity on... on the same day when you appointed four members of the accounting chamber, you also voted for the head of the accounting chamber, you did not vote, you held a signal vote, gathered more than 230 votes, they saw that there might be a lack of votes in the main voting and postponed this issue, you personally also voted for the signal voting, it was proposed to appoint olga pishchanska to this position, why did you vote by? the chairman of the verkhovna rada has the authority

to propose the chairman of the accounting chamber. he suggested olha pishchanska, a well-known specialist, she used to be the head of the anti-monopoly committee, during her tenure as the head of the anti-monopoly committee , there were not many such critical questions regarding her integrity or the functioning of the mcu, instead , anti-monopoly investigations were conducted, fines were issued, quite a lot, you can it's all to be followed, and there were also quite noisy cases, that is, is it correct? i realized, if on that day it was put to a vote to appoint olga pishchanska to the position of head of the accounting chamber, you would have voted for it in the same way as you voted for the signalman, well, yes , yes, i voted for the signalman, uh, you know that olga pishchanska, well you are from kryvyi rih, and she is an old friend of the president's family, well, this is some information, first of all, which needs verification, journalists, investigators have already verified everything, it is publicly available, okay,

let's get acquainted with this. you know that the person who should head the accounting chamber, according to requirements, she must speak english , she spoke the interview, no, it is an interview, no, she was asked a question in english, and she said, i 'm sorry, i'll answer in ukrainian, and she showed that she doesn't speak english at all language or speak it at a very low level, well, you have to rewatch the interview, because you should have rewatched it before... from the president's office to vote for olga pishchanskyi, the instructions from the president's office on how to vote do not go to the verkhovna radisto can anyone receive recommendations, that is , you were ready to appoint not only four members of the accounting chamber, but also the chairman of the accounting chamber without a transparent competition and

without reform? well, regarding the head of the accounting chamber in general, well, i don’t see anything about the requirements for transparent competitions, but maybe not for that, no, he ’s not there, it’s a collegial body, anyway, he ’s not there, if it’s strong, well, it’s not a minister, it’s a slightly different story well, it's like he has more powers than a member of the government, but he doesn't manage. member, i'm about it, i'm just still i will repeat once again that between the fact that more than half of the budget of ukraine consists of international aid, and as experts told me, the accounting chamber in the view of the partners is such a body to whom they can really trust their money, if it is independent, and they want to be certain