have created a resource through which you can report any crime against a child, in any city, at any time, just go to the site and report, and we will launch all possible mechanisms to punish the criminal. stopcrime ua. there are discounts on... evkalor 20% in psarynyk, pamp and oskad pharmacies. 93 separate mechanized brigade kholotny yar is in dire need of fp drones. to effectively hit the enemy and increase the losses of living and non-living forces of the occupier. to get closer to the victory that all of ukraine is waiting for. glory

to ukraine, to heroes. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresen. sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. and in america they also say, let's have better roads , we will have even better ones. a special look at the events in ukraine, there will be some katsaps on the border of kyiv and beyond. what kind of world does he dream of, mr. norman, we can do it ourselves. imagine it. all this in an informational marathon with mykola veresny. saturday - 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. every day, every hour, every minute we we get a lot of information. the most anticipated event of the year, what is actually happening on the front? what are the losses of personnel and equipment on the battlefield? how does the international community evaluate our successes and what is moscow lying about? from the stream of news coming from

all over the world, we single out the most important ones. the world is closely watching whether there will be weapons for ukraine and what kind, and what are the russian occupiers whispering about behind the commanders' backs? news, summaries of the week - this is an overview of only important events, important, reliable events, this is analytics, fact-checking, professional comments. that's about it many more in the release today. about important things, in simple language, available to all viewers. congratulations, iryna koval is in the studio and this. bags of the week on the espresso tv channel. news, summaries of the week, every saturday at 21:00 on espresso. verdict with serhiy rudenko, from now on in a new, two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests. foreign experts, inclusion from abroad. about ukraine, the world, the front, society. and feedback. you can express your opinion on the bad day with a phone survey. turn on and

turn on the verdict with serhii rudenko every weekday from 20:00 to 22:00 at espresso. kanal spresso and ukrainian pen present their own title project with myroslava barchuk. a series of conversations with ukrainian and western intellectuals who analyze and comment on the most relevant social debates. what news will be analyzed by the guests of the project this week, and actually, who will be the guest of the studio? let's find out. on sunday, the topics will definitely be relevant, the guests - special, proper names with myroslava barchuk. sunday: 17:10 for espresso.

greetings, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, the program studio zahid, we will analyze. events this week, there are

quite a few, and they are serious. our guests today are valery chaly and andrii pionkovskyi. valery chaly, ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary, will now be on the espresso tv channel. ambassador of ukraine to the united states in 2015-19. glory to ukraine, mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. i congratulate you as a hero slava. well, there are two processes going on. on the one hand, ukraine is trying to obtain the appropriate amount of weapons and financing. on the other hand , the big forum in davos is coming up. we understand that our issue is at the top of the agenda. well, you mentioned the forum in davos, let's start with that. this is a forum after all. where it traditionally started with the fact that business is going, and such large forces of an economic nature determine their actions, well, they say for the future, but at least for a year ahead, so for several months now there

is such an idea circulating among businesses that it would be desirable to forecast , or so that it happened that the hot phase of the war russia against ukraine ended sometime before the middle of the summer, that is, they had... this was their reasoning, i will tell you, it was possible around the time when the president of ukraine , volodymyr zelenskyi, visited new york, he also had meetings there with big business, and after that there were, information appeared in the american media that the dates just appeared, well, i also confirm with facts, this is because the international monetary fund was planning a so-called financing plan. until july 15 of this year, but now it seems to me that exactly these forecasts will be discussed correction regarding the time frame of the war , that is, there will be an economy, but an economy that will be based on a lot of geopolitical projections,

and i think it will be difficult to do even for the influential such shadowy business structures , big funds, hedge funds out there, because ... there is no complete certainty so far in those countries that they cannot, but could not now control or seriously influence them there, therefore, in principle, the part that will concern the general davos, it will not be completed in terms of forecasts, and a plus there will be a ukrainian-initiated part, a meeting based on the peace formula, yes, that is, also what was already discussed at... above the un meringue by their representative, that there will be such and such a format, and without russia, what kind of meeting is this without russia, this shows that this is a step in the right direction , what the result will be, we will see, perhaps not immediately after the delivery, as a result of decisions on

the supply of weapons, on support for ukraine, that is, in fact, this is a place where many influential people from various fields will meet, and it is obvious , that this is an opportunity... the position of ukraine to show more clearly our vision and our capabilities. there is a public side, it is very clearly declared, everything is clear to everyone. on the other hand, you rightly noted that russia will not be there, no one is inviting it to davos, and in general it does not take part in the discussions of the peace formula, because it is the direct culprit and aggressor. but the parameters of what will be discussed at davos in the context of the so- called peace formula. and this is how i understand the idea of ​​president volodymyr zelenskyi to give a new push so that more countries get involved, people from all over the world come to devoz. i think that it is unlikely that there will be any interruptions, because, based

on the fact that in this formula the first position, not the first in importance, but maybe even in importance, is the de-occupation of the territories, and by the year 91... .. well, it is obvious that this is a position that must be fulfilled in order to move on. i think that it would be desirable to discuss the point which is so vaguely set out in the peace formula, which is what concerns security guarantees. well, i know that the meeting was held by our government, regarding this position on nato. i hope that this will also be used to promote the very idea of ​​how to provide a security umbrella, not only for ukrainians. citizens , but also for that international business that will invest in ukraine after the deoccupation, i.e. whose investments must be physically protected, including from any attempts at russian provocations in the future, they will not end with the deoccupation of the territories, therefore

, in principle, i do not rely on it's kind of beyond expectations, to be honest, because there are many things now it is definitely not succeeded, and our... expectation that something will be resolved somewhere, for us or behind the back of ukraine, is not an expectation, some have fears, some have expectations, this is not really the case. that's not how decisions are made, and ukraine is subjective enough to talk about the fact that our fate is not decided by chance, well, that's for sure, it's not even decided in washington and not in brussels, it's decided in ukraine, first of all, and while ukraine is a subject, it happened in a strange way that the maximum subjectivity is ukraine received during a full-scale war, when the factor... of the armed forces of ukraine and the defense forces and the ability to stop a nuclear state, well

, at least one of the two most powerful in the world, let's not say, nuclear states, indicates the increase of ukrainian subjectivity, by the way , which is reflected even in the ratings of our military strength. ukraine has climbed several positions in the international rankings this year, that is, we will expect the next one, i think we will be even higher. well, in any case, we understand that subjectivity needs foreign aid, and i wanted you to analyze the dynamics that are currently observed in the united states, in particular with the allocation of macrofin for ukraine, this is also an issue directly related to security assistance, in particular, it is about supplies, ammunition, artillery systems and so on and so on so on, and the key story: a new factor has appeared, which is being discussed extremely powerfully in the united states, in particular, it is about the transfer of frozen russian assets to... the country, we understand that this is total war, total

it is meant that now russia is trying to force it to capitulate, that is , they have a constant idea, they do not hide it in principle, precisely by putting pressure on the fact that ukraine cannot stand it, as a smaller country, as a country with three times the population less, and the territory will not withstand such pressure, and in... in this version, in this situation, partner assistance, in particular with regard to these critical payments in the social sphere, it is really very important, but you know, first of all, i do not think that even in the worst case scenario, if there is no american money there, package 61.4 is 11.7 billion, if i am not mistaken, which the ukrainian government is counting on, in general, according to their statements, the government needs somewhere up to 30... 9 billion of annual external income, then i think that

, of course, other mechanisms can be found, they may not be so pleasant, it is clear that this is inflation, this is a certain printing of the hryvnia, or, for example, some other economic means, but this is not a catastrophe, moreover, i think that in despite the war, there is a way to rearrange priorities so that, for example, we do not spend money on capital construction, i in general, to be honest, i don’t understand, in the 14th year a government decree was passed, which forbade carrying out any repair work or buying cars, let’s say, yes, it was when, in principle, the war was not on such a scale as it is now, but this resolution, i remember perfectly how it was implemented, and now it has become easier, and we continue to build... some even declare about the subway, build new buildings, buy cars,

not those for the front, that is to say , and for internal use, even state ones institutions, and after that to convince the outside republicans that we don't have money, well, literally, at nikki haley's debate with desantes last week, there was a debate, and desantes said directly that... your money of american taxpayers is going into your pocket ukrainian bureaucrats, literally, and we understand that in ukraine, that we don't spend money on this, because everything in the army goes to the front. by the way, i don't know by what decision and why it was decided that ukraine can't, what for, what the west can't do with aid money send to the front, why is it prohibited, well , i understand that certain regulations. for a certain type of grants, i understand it, but why is there such a general rule, that is, the front is a critical issue for us,

and with regard to the rear, well, here we will have to close the holes in the customs finally, the huge smuggling of cigarettes, the production of illegal tobacco products, we do not see this , what enormous resources are being stolen from the country, taxation, well, not only take from... what do you want there, the idea of ​​the government to introduce more draconian taxes for people 18% on cash, just that the salary will drip there, you will have 18% on the card, that's what they want. well, you are delusional, but where are your solutions effective so that you close the holes, that is, in fact, internal resources can be sought in ukraine during the war, if everything is oriented correctly, nevertheless, if there is external help, then we will direct more to the defense of the country, yes, more funds and for de-occupation, so the question is not closed even

with this package of american aid, when it will be... i said a long time ago that it will not be before january, the end of january, the beginning of february the decision, moreover, now it is tied to the primaries, well, everyone expects the primaries, these primaries are the primaries where it will be determined who will be the republican candidate. the main fight will be between nazi primer at the end of the month, between donald trump and nikki haley, that is, most likely between them. and after cruz withdrew from the race, most likely these voices will leave, after all, there is no elena desantis, so in new hampshire, they do not want to make any drastic decisions before new hampshire, at the same time they are moving along the track adoption of the budget in general, on may 2 they

have to adopt by the third, in fact, the entire budget of the united states, that's it, well, you see. i'm sorry, not may, february, february, that is , it's somewhere around march 5, big tuesday, that's more than 800 votes of voters in the usa are distributed among the primaries of many states and caucuses, that is, the republicans want to drag this story out until march, but the white house wants everything still before, well, that's how i understand the meeting of the supreme court, which will finally decide on the admission of donald trump to the elections, and so on. from everything is interwoven into this and all these factors, which should give us an answer sometime in early february. now the answer is, if there is a 61.4 package, there will also be what you are asking about, the financial track, which is called, not only budget funds, but also for energy, for the development of some projects, additional funds for assistance in reforms, well, not only

military money, yes, not only for armaments, there is a large package, and this will then be... a signal that others, well, the kremlin, and, for example, the germans, that we can talk about taurus missiles, that there is a possibility of deoccupation and change move war, if this does not happen, then the disaster will not happen, because the usa will still help, moreover, 300 million is already unlocked, i understand, because the nda, they voted, this is the defense budget for the 24th year, that is. .. there will still be at least 300 million for two such current tranches, well, you see, they are allocating somewhere around 150-250 by the end of the year, that is, for another couple of months, well, they have not yet supplied weapons to all of ukraine, but you ask the right question, this is a financial signal, it will be bad, because our government is in a strange way

says, for example, i heard an official statement that then salaries will have to be postponed, there will be a payment in... a month of delusion, i say again, delusion, the government was created for that, to look for solutions, and not to transfer problems to international partners, well that's this government can't, another government can't, that is , these explanations are very strange, we can't , we will have to not pay salaries, i faced this, by the way, even when i was working for the ambassador, when i was told that there were no salaries for january, i say what, what... is it written down in your possession, where is it written down in your possession that you do not have payments to diplomats for january, well, yes , mr. ambassador, it has always been like this every year, you just encountered it for the first time, i say it will not happen, i am the responsible person, i am writing you a statement and filing a lawsuit against you that you do not pay salaries employees, you know the payment, all the payments, not by all embassies, but in the usa

they paid, and you know why, because we are used to this kind of disenfranchisement of a civil servant... that is, he constantly raised his hand, because you are in the civil service, so you have there is nothing like that with everyone, there is work efficiency, there is no such option, look for another, but no may be from this, firstly , people who are now giving results for the defense of the country will suffer, and secondly, well, you can't, go and give it to others, that's all, that's why i said it for so long, because our logic has to change , we should not... see the results of the war only in whether the west will help us, it just does not change the results of the war, but how much of it. it will drag on, it changes the course, it changes the intensity, it changes our possibilities for rapid deoccupation, but it does not affect the basic decision in ukraine, which

has been officially announced, that ukraine will not go to surrender, we understand that now on the battlefield the ukrainian army is also, well, in the same situation that we were in about a year and a half ago, in particular in terms of the number of artillery shells and not only them, well, and accordingly also... maybe it’s a conspiracy, maybe not , but there is a feeling that it is possible that they want to influence the intensity of the war at our expense in this way, simply by not supplying, the debate about the taurus has been going on for more than one year, the story about the f-16s, which keep flying and flying, is also not new, we understand , that all the graphs are a bit small are moving, if we talk about the situation, then i think that it is obvious to everyone that our strategy... of ukraine and, say, the united states, did not completely coincide from the very beginning, that is , the strategy of the united states is designed to contain the war within the territory of ukraine, that it did not go

to the countries nato, let's say, yes, that is, this position is clear, we are not allies, and there they are allies, but also the second position, they do not know what to do with russia, so they are very afraid, they were afraid of strikes on russia, yes, including their weapons, well, it is clear that in closed mode it is... discussions were ongoing berlin-moscow, paris, moscow, washington, moscow, that is, what they won't tell us, but it all went on, and beijing, let's say, washington, well, the meeting was in san francisco, i think there is such an agreement behind their backs, behind their backs, to prevent nuclear escalation, putin was clearly told by both the usa and china that this is a red line, it is impossible to cross it in any case, it is so constant. positional struggle, roughly so, and it is said publicly, if you give taurus, we will start taking over there from china or over there from the north korea's weapons, well, for example, i'm telling you this

theoretically, well, that's how they started, there are no taurus, and korean ballistic missiles are used, and that's another story, and this is a training ground for north korea, for these missiles, south korea knows very well, what if the time of preparation of these missiles and the strike on the south is shortened. at times when you have technical specifications at the training ground, and we, unfortunately, have a testing ground for them in this way. iran can also use it for ballistic missiles. that's why they understand it, start to think, change position there should be a correction of the strategy, and in principle, this is a political decision. no matter what they say to me, there are atakams over there, remember , they said, we simply don't have enough atakams, we don't have enough of them, and now suddenly the materials have appeared, they are being written off, they are being destroyed altogether. for what kind of conversation is this a very alarming signal , in fact, it is a bad conversation with ukraine, at first you say that you do not have one, so speak honestly, well, at least germany began

to act differently, after all, chancellor scholz first came up with reasons, whatever , now they say in open text, well, it's strange explanation, taurus won't help you, but still, it's not what they say there, you don't have experience, you don't have that, that, that means it's called ot... this ot war of regulation of escalation or regulation of dynamics , they did not succeed in this , moreover, this regulation did not help us very much in our attempt to de-occupy last year, it did not help much, because they allocated so much weapons for replacement, which in their understanding was only enough for an attack, and there was some in one direction, as they thought in the southern eye that's enough, i'm sorry, that's not how wars are waged, that is, well... that's definitely not how they're waged, they understand it now, there's been a lot of criticism that it's drop-by-drop dosing, 30 avroos tanks, what will 30 avroos tanks do, well

, well, it was important to unblock the german supply, yes i understand, but if you are betting on the result, you need to concentrate all the supplies now in the coming months, and several hundred missiles, these are not long-range missiles, these missiles are just... we will be allowed to hit on the territory of ukraine, you can even make a strange decision, yes, when we promise not to shoot missiles at russia there, well, this is generally some kind of delusion, because , well, just now our partners have just started to change their position, why not, which one, well, what kind of question is this, if they hit our territory with constantly strategic bombers, and we do not have the opportunity to cover the same base. well, i'm not talking about bombers, because they take off far away, but they specifically hit kharkov with missiles that are intended for anti-aircraft missiles, there are

s-300s, they hit. according to the people in kharkov, we have the right during the war to cover them there, that is what is here, and here is the source of supply, so i think that these games will end with a regulated escalation finally, will end, or maybe on the contrary it will be a prolonged affair, and actually it may be connected with the decrease of the macrofin, i will tell you the key thing, which which i told them with facts, i will not reveal the details of our conversations, but i will. i am sure that the situation in ukraine is stuck like this, that is, a dynamic permanent trench war, but there is no movement. in this situation, because russia is in defense 460,000 stands on our territory, and it fixed, despite the fact that we do not have the means of de-occupation, and they are concentrating on striking a nato country, parallel, not that we are what they say, if, if ukraine

loses... plays the next nato countries, no, the formula another, ukraine will not lose, ukraine is in history, it will drag on then, but it will win, everything will win, and you will be hit, that's what they underestimate, putin can during the war with ukraine, strike a nato country, maybe because look, i'm not claiming, but i just don't have any secret information there, but first... a fact: there were russian plans to attack estonia, operational plans, there were, this is a fact , i can confirm it, a fact, as an option, as a scenario, in 2013, and only by the fate of fate it turned out that they went to us , and not to estonia. second, look at estonia, narva and this piece, how long it takes to occupy narva, 89% of russians live in narva.

i.e. 5% of only estonians, how many agents of the kgb or fsb there are a lot, so this piece, for, well, i am not talking about an hour, as they talk about two or two or three weeks days kyiv, i say that it is absolutely realistic, not having a huge advantage there in manpower to occupy and protest, how nato will react to this. well, there is the question of finland, yes, and this is in the direction, it is there , they are creating this district now, they are transferring forces there very quickly, so it is clear that their hands are itching, it will hit there, it is just that ukraine is now a distraction, but if you put ukraine in defense mode, well, because you will not provide it with weapons, then putin will release part of his forces and carry out a provocation

there, so that they raise the rates, so that... then they trade at the expense of ukraine, that is the scenario, i think, could be. i would also like to ask you about the powers of the presidential delegation that will discuss the issue of security guarantees, the powers and , in general, the parameters of what can be discussed. well, regarding the form, when last year istanbul was this document, from our side, i publicly said then that it is absolutely wrong, there is no delegation, no chapter, no decree. the president has no directives, now in this case everything went right, there are directives, they are secret delegations, well, the delegation is a bit strange, because there are not many diplomats there, well, as a rule, delegations for negotiations are formed from diplomats, there are either diplomats who have never been abroad, well , they did not participate in negotiations at all, or?

just the heads of law enforcement agencies, so it is if i perceive more how to give weight to this delegation, well if, it is clear that it will not go to negotiations in such a composition, conduct negotiations, it will not be, that is, it will be simple, well, there specifically will be one or two people who will be on behalf of andriy yermak conduct some kind of preparatory work there, and accordingly, the head of the office will discuss it directly, what is my concern here? worries about what it is called in relation to security guarantees, our partners categorically do not perceive the word guarantees and throw them out of the draft of all agreements, and the president's office knows this. the president's office explained that they did not deny it in the president's office, because it is true, but they said, well, there will be no assurances, as was the case in the budapest memo. listen, that's stupid.