journalists, well , you think, well, let them listen to these journalists, or about the detention of businessman mazepa, who was going to davos, today i even saw a comment by a person that, well, otkiy is submitting to the council a draft law that will allow all ethnic ukrainians to have ukrainian citizenship and their descendants from different countries, except russia. according to zelenskyi, earthly volunteers who came to the defense of ukraine will also be able to obtain ukrainian citizenship. for everyone who can feel that being in ukraine means being at home, not tourists citizens of the great, cathedral, united ukraine, for the freedom we are fighting for, for the right to be ukrainians, and the corresponding decision, one of the elements of such freedom, one of... the realization of such a right,

the right to be ukrainian. the ground is being prepared for a possible meeting with orban, the head of the office of the president of ukraine andriy yermak considers a possible meeting between zelenskyi and hungarian prime minister viktor orban. he stated this in an interview with interfax ukraine. yarmak said that the preparation of the meeting between the two leaders will be the main task during the minister's talks of foreign affairs of ukraine dmytro kuleba with uhorsky. colleague siyarto in uzhhorod on january 29. polish prime minister donald tusk arrived in kyiv. this is his first visit to ukraine since his appointment as the head of the government. it is planned, in particular, to discuss poland's embargo on the import of ukrainian agricultural products and the blockade of the border by polish carriers. the european commission wants to allow import restrictions.

ukrainian agricultural products to certain countries. corresponding changes to eu trade legislation can be presented this week. about this said european commissioner for trade valdis dombrovkis. he noted that currently the distribution of ukrainian agricultural exports is uneven. according to the european commissioner, the proposal will cover the year until june 2025. however, it must first be approved by the european parliament and the majority of eu member states. kyiv will be able to attract much more funds from other donors if the american congress approves the financing of ukraine, said the special representative for the economic recovery of ukraine in us state department, penny pritzker. in particular, she called the economic support of ukraine from the us a force multiplier. if the congress allocates the invited 11 billion 800 million dollars, then... other donors, in particular the international

monetary fund, will triple the total financial support of ukraine. and to operational information from the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine. 68 combat clashes took place at the front during the day. in the lyman direction, the defense forces repelled five attacks near terni and yampolivka, and another six near bilogorivka. the russians do not stop trying to surround avdiivka. there, our defenders repelled more than stormed in the bakhmud direction, ukrainian defenders stopped seven russian attacks, and repulsed the same number in the zaporozhye direction, near vervovoy and robotyny. in the kherson direction, the russians tried to attack our positions six times. our aircraft made nine strikes on the area where the occupiers were concentrated. and rocket launchers and gunners hit the personnel concentration area, three artillery pieces and destroyed the control post of the muscovites. by the day

of the cathedral, our defenders were released ukrainian land from 830 occupiers , and in general, since the beginning of the full-scale russian invasion, 376,860 russians have already left our country in black bags, the defense forces took care of enemy equipment, 11 tanks, 23 armored combat vehicles, 21 artillery systems were reduced to ashes in the past day alone . the enemy, as well as 29 vehicles, two air defense systems and five units of special equipment. 25 enemy drones and one cruise missile will never fly into the ukrainian sky again. the general staff reminds that all data are approximate. the sbi began investigating the murder of four people in liman, donetsk region. previously , a conflict arose between a local resident and a military serviceman. they left on call.

the investigative-operational group, however, contact with them disappeared, later law enforcement officers arrived there, at the scene of the tragedy they found the bodies of two colleagues and two women, a pensioner, as well as her daughter, soon... servicemen from the national guard detained. the body of an eight-year-old boy was recovered from the ingulets river in kirovohrad oblast. this was reported in the state emergency service. local the resident last saw two boys near the reservoir. after that, the children disappeared. in the morning , rescuers found one of the boys dead. the search for another child continues. double somersault in the air. in uzhgorod, the driver flew into a ring, fleeing from patrolmen. the incident took place at the intersection of hrushevskyi and minaiskyi streets. the driver of the bmw was fleeing from patrols throughout the city, accelerating to 140 km/h, but lost control, hit the curb and landed on the lawn.

nothing is known about the victims at the moment. corrected missile strikes on mykolaiv. service security delayed. russian informant. the intruder sought information for the occupiers about medical facilities and military hospitals where ukrainian defenders are being treated. the russians wanted to use the electronic map with the necessary markings for future missile attacks. the law enforcement officers responded promptly and exposed the perpetrator before the data was transferred. and the espresso tv channel asks that the losses of the occupiers be greater. to join the gathering of soldiers of the legendary 95th separate airborne assault brigade, you need a cargo bus. defenders of the car used for the fastest delivery of ammunition to the settlements that destroy the russian invaders and their armored

vehicles. in general, our goal is uah 200,000. you and i have already collected over uah 190,000. there is very little left until the end of the collection. your help is extremely important. you can now see all the details on your screens. for now, this is all the news for this hour, you will learn more later. i welcome you, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, the program studio zahid. we will analyze the most important events of this week, including the consequences davos forum, in particular for ukraine. we will also analyze an extremely dangerous signal from the kremlin. in particular,

the former president of russia medvedev said that russia will wage war not only against the ukrainian state, but against what is called ukrainianness. matthew bryza and mark fagin talk about it on our broadcast. and now mark feigin, a figure of the russian opposition in emigration, a former member of the state duma, an iconic video blogger, glory to ukraine, mark, congratulations, glory to the heroes, congratulations anton, congratulations to all viewers, well, i didn’t want to work would work as a psychoanalyst for medvedev, but he gave an extremely harsh, boorish and dangerous signal, well, the key story here is how seriously we should interpret what medvedev wrote, i don’t know whether it is from bodun or not from bodun, but in any case in any case, he described the situation as the preparation of the russian federation for the so-called existential war with ukraine. it is not the first time that medvedev issues something similar and even more deviant, let me remind you, he recently in connection with the visit of the prime minister of great britain rishunyk

showed little unpreparedness for war under certain circumstances, not to mention the shelling of belgorod and the like. so from a personal point of view, this is not a fully representative opinion of russian. head of putin's security council, he is a former clone, but the president of the russian federation, so his words, even if not at least, have to be taken more seriously: firstly, no one stops him from the kremlin, does not refute his words, he is an official person, not some average propagandist there. therefore, it is possible that medvedev conveys the atmosphere of the mood in the security council the kremlin rules because it is allowed to make just such a presentation. presumably, they use it to test, provoke, check the reaction that may be to such statements. yes, they are wild, completely infernal. but it's interesting for the kremlin, they like to play this kind of game. and what is valuable and important here,

because putin himself two days ago said things no less dekun. he said that fools do not want to negotiate with us. everyone has heard these quotes that everything would have ended a long time ago, you yourself understand, this is his direct quote: no territories we will not return those captured, we are not even talking about the referendum, but we captured and will not return. the russian-speaking population, just as in he granted it with the fact that they will protect ukraine, hinting at the war in the baltic countries, i would say that, although not in form, but in content, what putin himself declares differs little by. regarding ukraine: first of all, in ukraine they have already

waged an aggressive war and are killing people. can we expect more from them, for example, the use of nuclear weapons? it's always a story that has a crazy explanation, but who said that the kremlin is irrational in its behavior and cannot allow for itself just such a course of events. therefore, it is worth listening to such words. existential war for existence is already a question of interpretations, because today, too, the question arose without the use of unconventional means precisely about the threat to the existence of ukraine itself. this is exactly what the kremlin is trying to do, so you can’t make any promises about negotiations, because the goal... i spoke with moscow, it’s not the consolidation of the status quo, compromises, etc., but capitulation, i.e.

the destruction of ukraine as a subject of international law, as a sovereign state, as an independent nation. there should be no illusions here, there should be no naive expectations on this issue that moscow is ready to stop at something. no, medvedev said, we will never detach from ukraine, i read and translated it in ukrainian. it declares officially. a person of a country that is a permanent member of the security council with the right of veto, a founding country of the un, which guarantees, in fact, as one of the five states, international security throughout the world, in the scale of the planet. this should be perceived as the real position of the kremlin and its residents. well, the key story is how relevant the so-called collective event will be now, so we listened to several extremely important speeches, in particular at davozskyi. forum, so we understand that french president emmanuel macron also gave a signal, in particular, it is about supplying us with additional

scalp missiles, so we also understand that they worked extremely well in their time, we understand that there is a question about money and about common strategy, but the key story is how seriously the west has become involved in the so-called military deterrence of the kremlin, or is it, so to speak, that we are moving along a certain palliative path, that is, the kremlin will constantly increase the production of weapons, if not itself, then it will lend them in china or the republic of korea, well, when i say korean i mean north korea and so on and so forth. starting from the autumn, but really from the end of the winter of 2023, the situation began to change, because the american administration began to behave more decisively. she also supports ukraine in words, but the truth. saying, this delay in the allocation of 60 billion for ukraine and the disputes between the republicans and the democrats suggest

the worst thoughts. in contrast to this, europe , on the contrary, somehow radicalized not only macron and scholz and some persons from the german leadership, despite the decision of the bundestag to retain and not provide taurus missiles to ukraine. in addition, they generally take a fairly clear position and publicly articulate it. on the other hand, in america, as we can see, the strong influence of the presidential election campaign, which is already takes place and ends in november 2024 . how it affects the issue of support for ukraine, military aid, the position of western countries, especially washington, as the leader of the western world, has a direct impact. even the biden administration, in contrast to the republicans, behaves much more cautiously. ukraine, as we understand it, until

november 2024, until it is decided who will be the master of the oval office for the next four years. this is a strange position for the simple reason that this is exactly what moscow is striving for, so that behind this positional defense, change tactics and strategies, give it a break, give it possible. from the rock and will mine it , it is necessary to protect the 80% of the territory that remains behind kyiv, but the question is different: what if trump wins the election? rhetorical question. is sullivan and the biden administration offering some kind of plan in case that happens? maybe if trump comes, this is my view, maybe it's better

to saturate ukraine with money and weapons as soon as possible, so that it will last for a while, and until trump ... comes to power after the inauguration in january in 2025, at least this year, it could fight normally, with the support of european states, with funding, with the funds that european countries, in particular france, can provide from their scalps and other countries, but funds are needed in any case. there are many questions, we will hear the answer to many of them when the senate does decide whether it will undertake to solve the issue of allocation. of this ill-fated $60 billion, we will then know whether the american establishment is prepared, as before, during these two years, to support ukraine in its defense of sovereignty in this war with russia, that is the question. mark, well, you very clearly outlined, so to speak, two speeds, at least two or three

geopolitical speeds, on the one hand we understand that the kremlin is counting on the american election campaign. and we understand that it will be far, far from simple , to put it mildly, that is , scenarios of certain cannibalism are already beginning there, we understand that the kremlin is counting on a series of elections in the countries of the european union, on general fatigue, so we remember the speech of extremely the strange provocateur of the slovak member of the european parliament, yes, who started talking about the brothers of the slavs and so on and so forth, to reconcile, and here we have a corresponding certain scene. on which the kremlin is very clearly counting, in particular, when it comes to its preparation for various, possibly global things. the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi recently spoke about global threats. if you try to bring this whole thing into a single concept, which you see now, for example,

medium-term and short-term movements on the part of the kremlin and in general, how will we be right build ours, i don't know. first , trump himself adds to the fire, he said that he would agree with putin that putin is a normal dude, he evaluates him in a business way, and this is counting the primaries in iowa, where he got 51%, but this is a dangerous signal, that is, he continues, despite the situation, to publicly voice their complementary attitude towards putin. he does not try to silence this issue, to avoid it during the election campaign. clearly marks him why this is important, if suddenly he wins the election, he will say: listen, i did not deceive you, dear voters and partners of the usa. i said during the election campaign about my position that i would come to an agreement with putin, that we would come to an agreement normally, share everything and decide. these are illusions, of course he is not going to negotiate, he is maximizing

the result, demanding capitulation, we just don't know what trump will be ready for in the event. who will come to the white house and accordingly change the strategy of the american administration, another question is whether he is able to do this? and as he himself, he himself says, i would agree on this, but under what conditions to give 20%, and 80%, you agreed, agreed well with putin, offered this plan to ukraine, and 80% remain sovereign, they go to nato, the eu. this is where i seem to have a lot of illusions, maybe trump thinks that he is just spraying, here is your profit time, here is mine, he thinks like a developer. he does not cease to be them, even despite the previous first term from 2016 to 2020, in which he was the president of the united states. i always like the criticism of trumpists, saying: "oh, poor

trump, he is not given anywhere, everywhere persecuted, but he has not only served four years of the term of the president, he is going to take it again, and i do not see that he is being persecuted so kindly, not allowing him to participate in the election campaign, at least in the nomination for the nomination of the republican party therefore, in this difficult situation, after all, in ukraine, kyiv needs to act bolder, try to work with the american establishment, trump's entourage, at least to finally find out what strategy you plan to follow, so trump will determine a lot, but he will rely on the congressional majority, which will be republican in the house of representatives for the time being, esp. and what is the strategy in the usa in the event that a change of power takes place... at the very least, it would be desirable to receive guarantees from the republican establishment, even trump's entourage, that fundamentally nothing will change strategically, that ukraine

will be supported in the war with moscow, this is from one on the one hand, on the other hand, you need to realistically assess the situation, whoever is the candidate from the republican party, biden's chances today, i don't know what will change, a lot of things can still change, at the moment they are small, for today we have to move on from this, well... we have a year together with the biden administration, and the key story is how to use this time right now, yes, well, in particular, it is also about resources, and on the other hand, i wish we could just feel what the kremlin will be capable of now, we understand that the kremlin can threaten, but the question of the threat, the question of real ability, that's a little different, look, from biden, now the main thing that can be obtained is clearly what is needed to continue to fight for these 60 billion, to try... to convince both republicans and democrats that they are necessary, it is necessary to achieve at the summer nato summit, which will be hosted by washington and

biden, the 75-year anniversary summit of nato, so that the invitation on accession to nato was given to ukraine. this is the best guarantee of safety in the end. yes, this is a process, it will not happen in one day, there will still be a discussion within nato, and maybe... it will take another year to make some decisions regarding the admission of ukraine to nato. but it will compensate for that democrats may lose power and the situation may change dramatically. membership in nato and coverage by the collective agreement of the north atlantic alliance is, after all , compensation for all those problems that are already visible, at least until november 2024. this seems to me to be a fundamental key point, if biden does not dare to do so, and this is historic. we realize, a person in his nineties, the chances of staying for another four years are illusory, not zero, but not obvious. maybe something else will change radically, and

of course it would be some kind of compensation, by creating a certain guarantee that this tool will help ukraine defend itself in the coming months and even years. mark, and putin? what putin will do in the current situation, what putin can do and what he has done. simply not in a position, i don't know, due to a lack of resources or certain fears, that it is not just some bashkartostan scenario that can be implemented, but what is additional, well, we understand how they very, very react to something like this, it is not even hidden, putin is waiting for the elections, he says, the armed forces failed the counteroffensive, the whole thing the initiative is in the hands of the russian troops, this is declared publicly, that is, he does not give up hope that some of the offensive operations for... besides, look, because they tried

to advance on avdiivka. more than two months, no result. before that , there was a very acute situation with kupyansk. kupyansk is a junction, the road to kharkiv opens. i was in those places, i had the opportunity to see everything directly, i looked down on the shard-river. was in kupyansk and in the center and in the positions, i can hardly imagine how much effort and resources need to be spent to take kupyansk. i suspect that it is the same in avdiivka , i have not been there, i really wanted to visit, but i suspect that it is not too easy there either, in the area of ​​the coke plant you will put another 1040 people to take it all, a pyrrhic victory. perhaps it has a political connotation, he needs to show it by march 17 before his elections. this is not to win the elections, it is clear that there are no elections, he is simply drawn by these 80.85%, and it is important for him to control public opinion,

that everything is not in vain. look, yes, we are fighting, we are slowly advancing, we want something occupy, but all the sacrifices are not in vain , all the costs are not in vain, we achieve some incredible geopolitical success in the long term, protecting our defense capability and... by the time of the elections in the usa, it is definitely preparing and will start some offensive actions in the east, maybe in the south, in the south it is more difficult, but in the east, one can assume, but from the belarusian direction? no, i think he will survive the pause, but what is the price? if you try to get involved again because of some hostilities in belarus, there will be a problem with lukashenka. what is lukashenko afraid of? him to sneeze at ukraine and on belarus actually too, but he is afraid that ukraine will respond. ukraine already has the means to shoot at his residence and kill

someone from his entourage. and no one will hang around anymore, as it was in february 2022, it is much easier for the ukrainian special services to carry out punitive or sabotage actions there, just to kill prominent generals or responsible persons from the belarusian leadership for such, who will allow the next massacre, and the defense line with belarus is very strong, or kyiv is nearby and everything is mined, so it won't be easy. sumy or chernihiv, here for now the question is open whether russia can launch an attack on these border towns from the territory of the russian federation. whether this can be expected is an open question. in my opinion, such an operation is more likely than an invasion from the territory of belarus. because lukashenko himself will deal with this development of events to the last, because he understands that it will not leave him any chances, he no longer has relations with

the west, and it is clear what he has. relations with the kremlin, but with ukraine there is such an unspoken parity, you do not touch us, you do not allow a new massacre and similar horror, which was, and we still endure all this. and lukashenka is satisfied with this status quo, and if this situation is to be moved, who knows, you won't be able to reach putin, but lukashenka is much easier. that's the thing. therefore, i believe that everything will be much more difficult there. even if this happens, lukashenka will not be asked. mark, well, an intimate, delicate question. yes, i would not like to spread conspiracy theories, but oleksiy restovych and his strange interview, strange conversation with latinina. i looked at this case and my eyes became much larger than in latin behind glasses, yes, even she couldn't stand it anymore. oleksiy began to convert such.

on the fan, which simply does not fit into the concept in general, but you, as a person who has worked with him for more than one hour on the air, so i think you can read oleksiy himself very well, in general, i would like to ask you what is happening with him now, on your opinion, i always, when asked questions, answer for the period when he was on my airs, then there were some shoals too, but this is not what is happening now, all year and a half it was possible fluctuations within the so-called general geopolitical policy of the pro-ukrainian party? in general, yes, you can view all these ethers, they are there, what happened to them. what happened to him next? i said in august, when many people criticized me for

what i stopped doing with... the first alarms started already in.