after paying a bribe, they could leave the territory of ukraine. for $3,500 , decisions were made in court that fictitiously determined the place of residence of minor children by husband. this gave conscripts the right to go abroad despite the martial law. according to the investigation, the scheme has been operating since mid-april 2022. over 1,000 similar decisions were issued during this time. a lawyer involved in the scheme was looking for clients. pravozahnyk also acted as a mediator. when transferring money. scheme with fictitious court decisions on the residence of children on the favor of the father was activated just at the beginning of the full-scale war and last year gained skyrocketing momentum. ngl media journalists have analyzed such court decisions since 2021 . then there were 289 of them. in 2022, the number increased to 859, and in 2023 it is as many as 2708 and 30%. of them were passed in

the belgorod-dniester court, we actually found that specifically four judges made all these decisions, you can apply if you have a lease agreement for housing, i have reasons, what is called according to the place of registration to apply to the court, and and actually, how about me these things also testify to the scheme, well , because most people, well, accordingly, did not live, according to the investigation materials, one of the key figures in the scheme is the former head of belgo. oleksandr boyarskyi of the dnistrovsky district court, if it was not a pressure trial today, then what was it at all? and i am asking you to shed light on this issue. oleksandr boyarsky was informed of the suspicion. the higher anti-corruption court chose a preventive measure for him in the form of detention with the possibility of release on bail in the amount of uah 1,59,800. boyarsky has already stated that will pay the bail, and it is not surprising, money for... the judge does not have a problem. odesa media

call the boyar judge a millionaire. for 2022, he declared $30,000 in cash. the judge has $7,200, almost €46 , and almost uah 3 million in his accounts. oleksandr boyarskyi is currently also involved in another case. in july 2021, the state bureau of investigation exposed him for attempted fraud. the head of the court , through the mediation of the lawyer, promised the odesa resident to ensure acceptance by others. judge of a positive decision. first, the judge and the lawyer planned to receive uah 700,000 from the citizen, and then reduced the amount to $600. the law enforcement officers documented the transfer of $3,500 to the judge, the lawyer was detained while receiving the rest of the funds. now there is an open criminal case against him, which is still being investigated and is still in court. the supreme council of justice suspended boyarsky from the administration of justice. however, he returned to his post in two months. established the names of other judges

of the belgorod-dniester court who made decisions that allowed men to evade mobilization and travel abroad. the second according to our rating was the current head of this court, valentyn zaviryuha, that is, he was also the second, the third is serhiy savytskyi. officially, the judges do not yet appear in the case of the sbu and nabucza. in general, the judges of the belgorod-dniester court could earn more than 3 million dollars by helping the man. fake divorce in order to avoid mobilization and leave the borders of ukraine. for today, i have everything, it was the program court control and i by tetyana shustrova. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal solutions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you in exactly one week.

greetings, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, the program studio zahid, we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular, we are talking about the consequences of the davos forum, in particular for ukraine, we will also analyze an extremely dangerous signal from the kremlin, in particular, the former president of russia medvedev said, that russia will lead. not only against the ukrainian state, but against what is called ukrainianness. matthew talks about it on our broadcast bryza and mark fagin. and now mark feigin, a figure of the russian opposition in emigration, former deputy of the state duma, iconic video blogger, will work on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mark, congratulations. glory to the hero, i congratulate anton, i congratulate all the viewers. well , i would not like to work as a psychoanalyst for medvedev, but he gave an extremely harsh, boorish and not ... safe signal, well

, the key story here is how seriously we should interpret what medvedev wrote, i don't know if it is from bodun or not from budun, but in any case he described the situation as preparation. of the russian federation before the so-called existential war with ukraine. it is not the first time that medvedov has published something similar and even more deviant. let me remind you that recently, in connection with the visit of the prime minister of great britain, iri shunyk, he almost appeared ready for war under certain circumstances, not to mention the shelling of belgorod and the like. so from a personal point of view, this is not a fully representative opinion of the russian authorities. but medviev is still the deputy chairman. for putin's security, although he is a former cologne resident, he is the president the russian federation, therefore, his words should be taken more seriously, if at all. first of all, no one stops him from the kremlin, does not refute his words, he is an official, not some ordinary propagandist. therefore, it is possible that medvedev conveys

the atmosphere of the mood that prevails in the security council in the kremlin, because he is allowed to make such a presentation, presumably through him they test, provoke, check. but it's interesting for the kremlin, they like to play like this, such an elusive game. and what is valuable and important here, because putin himself two days ago said things no less dekun. he said that fools do not want to negotiate with us. everyone has heard these quotes that everything would have ended a long time ago, but you yourself. you see, this is his direct quote: we will not give back any captured territories, we are not even talking about a referendum, but we have captured and we will not give it back, and everyone in the west understands this, etc. putin also spoke about the baltic countries, which

are expelling some agents of moscow under the threat of national security. he attributed this to the fact that the russian-speaking population would be protected, just as in ukraine, hinting at the war in the countries balttia. i would say that, although not in form, but in content, what putin himself declares differs little in aggressiveness of rhetoric. as for ukraine, first of all, in ukraine they have already waged an aggressive war and are killing people. can we expect more from them, for example, the use of nuclear weapons? it's always a story that has a crazy explanation, but who said the kremlin is irrational. in his behavior and cannot allow for himself exactly such a course of events, therefore it is worth listening to such words, it is necessary to study them, despite the insignificant source, from which they proceed, because certain attitudes of medvedev are transmitted from the kremlin after all.

existential war for existence is already a question of interpretations, because today, too , without the use of unconventional means, the question of the threat of existence itself has arisen. this is exactly what the kremlin is seeking, so you can’t make any promises regarding negotiations, because the goal of negotiations with moscow is not to consolidate the status quo, compromises, etc., but capitulation, that is, the destruction of ukraine as a subject of international law, as a sovereign state, as an independent nation. there should be no illusions here, there should be no naive expectations on this issue that moscow is ready to stop at something. we will never let go of ukraine, i read and translated it in ukrainian. this is stated by the official of the country, which is a permanent member of the security council with the right of veto, the founding country of the un, which actually guarantees, as one of the five states, the

same international security throughout the world, on a planetary scale. this should be perceived as the real position of the kremlin and its residents. and the key story. how now, how much the so-called collective action will be relevant, so we listened to several extremely important speeches, in particular at the davos forum, so we understand that the french president emmanuel macron also gave a signal, in particular, it is about supplying us with additional scalp missiles, so we understand that they worked extremely well at one time, we understand that there is a question about money and about a joint strategy, but the key story is how seriously the west has become involved... in what is called the military deterrence of the kremlin, is this, so to speak, we are moving along a certain palliative path, that is, the kremlin will constantly increase the production of weapons, if not itself, then it will borrow them from the chinese or korean republics, well, when i say

korean, i mean north korea and so on and so on so on. starting from autumn, but really from the end of winter 2023, the situation started. because the american administration began to behave more cautiously, it also verbally supports ukraine, but to tell the truth, this delay in the allocation of 60 billion for ukraine. disputes between republicans and democrats suggest the worst thoughts. in contrast to this, europe, on the contrary, was somehow radicalized not only by macron, but also by scholz and some persons from the german leadership, despite the decision of the bundestag, however, to keep and not provide taurus missiles to ukraine. in addition, they generally take a fairly clear position and publicly articulate it. on the other hand, in america , as we can see, there is a strong influence in... how it

affects the issue of support for ukraine, military aid, the position of ukraine in the west, especially washington, as the leader of the western world, directly influences, even the administration biden, in contrast to the republicans , behaves much more cautiously, there is information from bloomberg that in davos sullivan will convey the position. we need to move into a positional stage, a defensive position for ukraine, as we understand it, until november 2024, until it is decided who will be the master of the oval office for the next four years. this is a strange position for the simple reason that this is exactly what moscow is striving for, to give it a break, to give it an opportunity to accumulate strength, and then for sure no sullivan. will not stop offensive actions, not to mention the fact that there is no plan b.

well, ukraine will create defense structures and mine it as necessary to protect the 80% of the territory that remains outside kyiv. but the question is different: what if trump wins the election? a rhetorical question. sullivan and the biden administration are offering some sort of plan in case that happens. maybe if... that trump comes, that's my point of view, maybe it's better to saturate ukraine with money and weapons as soon as possible, so that for a while, until trump will come to power after his inauguration in january 2025, at least this year he could fight normally. yes, with the support of european states, with financing, with those funds that european countries, in particular france, with their scalps and other countries, can provide, but funds are needed in any case. there are many questions, we will hear the answer to many of them when the senate does decide

whether it will take up the issue of allocating these ill-fated 60 billion dollars. we will understand then whether the american establishment is ready, as before during these two years, to support ukraine in its defense of sovereignty in this war with russia, that is the question. mark, well you have outlined very clearly, so to speak. two speeds, at least two or three geopolitical speeds. on the one hand, we understand that the kremlin is counting on the american election campaign, we understand that it will be far, far from simple, to put it mildly, that is, scenarios of certain cannibalism are already beginning there. we understand that the kremlin is counting on a series of elections in the countries of the european union, on general fatigue, yes, we remember the speech of here is an extremely strange provocateur, a slovak deputy. to the european parliament, yes , which began to talk about the brothers of the slavs, and so on, and so on, to reconcile, so we have

certain corresponding scenarios that the kremlin is very clearly counting on, in particular, when it comes to its preparation for various, perhaps of global things, about global threats , the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi said recently, if you try to summarize all this into a single concept, which you see with... now, for example, medium- and short-term movements on the part of the kremlin and , in general, how we will build our , i don’t know, international communication correctly, first of all, trump himself adds to the fire, he said that he would agree with putin, that putin is a normal dude, he evaluates him in a business-like way, and this counting the primaries in iowa, where he received 51%, but this is a dangerous signal, that is, he continues, despite the situation, to publicly voice his comp. he does not try to silence this issue, to avoid

it during the election campaign, no, he clearly marks it. why is it important if suddenly he will win the elections, he will say: listen, i did not deceive you, dear voters and partners of the usa. i said during the election campaign about my position that i would come to an agreement with putin, that we would come to an agreement normally, share everything and decide. of course, he is not going to negotiate, he maximizes the result, demands capitulation, we simply do not know what trump will be ready for in case he comes to the white house and changes the american strategy accordingly.

that he just sprays, here is your profit time, here is mine, he thinks like that developer he does not cease to be them, even despite the previous first term from 2016 to 2020, in which he was the president of the united states. i always like the criticism of the trumpists, who say: "oh, poor trump, they don't give him anywhere." they are being persecuted everywhere, but he has not only already served four years as president, he is going to take it again. and i don't see that they are already persecuting him so kindly, preventing him from participating in the election campaign, at least in the nomination for the republican party nomination. therefore, in this difficult situation, after all, in ukraine, kyiv needs to act bolder, try to work with the american establishment, trump's entourage, at least find out finally what strategy you plan to follow. yes,

trump will determine many things, but he will not rely on a majority in congress. which will still be republican in the house of representatives, in particular, and what is the us strategy in the event that a change of power takes place , at least it would be desirable to receive guarantees from the republican establishment, even trump's entourage, that fundamentally, strategically, nothing will change, that ukraine will support in the war with moscow, this is on the one hand, on the other hand, you need to realistically assess the situation, whoever is the candidate from the republican party, biden's chances today, i don't know what... will change, a lot can still change, currently small, for today it is necessary to get out of it for the time being. well, we have a year together with the biden administration, and so the key story is how to use this time right now, yes, well, in particular, it's about resources, and on the other hand, i wish we could just feel, on what will happen now

capable kremlin. we understand that the kremlin can threaten, but the question of threats is the question of real ability. this is a little different , the main thing you can get from biden right now, it is clear that you need to continue to fight for these 60 billion, try to convince both republicans and democrats that they are necessary, you need to achieve at the summer nato summit, which will be hosted by washington and biden, the 75-year anniversary summit of nato, so that the invitation to join nato is given to ukraine. this is the best. security guarantee and the rest yes, this is a process, it will not happen in one day, but there will still be a discussion within nato, and maybe it will take another year to make some decisions regarding the admission of ukraine to nato. but this will be compensation for the fact that the democrats may lose power and the situation may change radically. membership in nato and

coverage by the collective agreement of the north atlantic alliance is, after all , compensation for all those problems that are already in ... at least until november 2024. this seems to me to be a fundamental key point, if biden does not dare to do so, and this is historic decision. we realize that the chances of a person in his nineties to stay for another four years are illusory, not zero, but not obvious. maybe something else will change radically, and of course it would be some kind of compensation, the creation of a certain guarantee that this tool will help ukraine defend itself in the coming months, or even years. mark, what about putin, what will putin do in the current situation , what can putin do and what is he simply not in a position to do, i don’t know, due to a lack of resources or certain fears, what can be realized not just by someone there bashkartostan scenario, and what else is additional, well, we understand how they react very, very much to something like this, well, it's

not even hidden, putin is waiting for the elections, he says, the armed forces failed the counter-attack. the entire initiative is in the hands of the russian troops, this is declared publicly, that is, he does not give up hope that some of the offensive operations will end in success, for example, maryinka, although this is a very specific operation, when the russian troops entered a completely destroyed settlement, besides, see after all, they tried to advance on avdiivka, more than two times months, no result, before that there was a very acute situation with kupyansk, kupyansk is a knotty one, it opens up to... i was in kupyansk both in the center and on the positions. it is difficult to imagine how much effort and resources need to be spent to take kupyansk. i suspect that it is the same in avdiivka, i have not been there, i really wanted to visit, but i suspect that it is not too

easy there either: in the area of ​​the coke plant, you will put another 100-40 people to take it all as a pyrrhic victory. perhaps it has a political connotation, he needs until march 17 to to show at least something about their elections. who is in the elections, it is clear that there are no elections, he is simply drawn by these 80-85%, and it is important for him to control public opinion, that everything is not in vain. look, yes, we fight, we advance slowly, we want something and occupy, but all the sacrifices are not in vain, all the expenses are not in vain, we achieve some incredible geopolitical success in the long run, protecting our defense capabilities and the like. so putin, of course, despite the wait. position for the election period in the usa is definitely preparing and will start some offensive actions in the east, maybe in the south, in the south it is more difficult, but in the east it is possible to assume, but from

the belarusian direction? no, i think he will survive the pause, what is the price? if you try to get involved again through belarus in some hostilities, there will be a problem with lukashenko, what is lukashenko afraid of, he will be mad at ukraine and belarus, actually, too, but he... it is much easier for the ukrainian special services to simply kill prominent generals or responsible persons from belarus , management for such, who will allow the next riot? and the defensive line with belarus is very strong, because kyiv is nearby and everything is mined, so it will not be easy. but on kharkiv, sumy or chernihiv, the question is still open here, whether

russia can launch an attack on these border cities from the territory of the russian federation. whether this can be expected is an open question. in my opinion, such an operation is more likely than an invasion from the territory of belarus. because lukashenko himself to the last. will take such a turn of events, because he understands that this will not leave him any chances, he no longer has relations with the west, and it is clear what he has relations with the kremlin, but with ukraine there is such an unspoken parity, you don't touch us, you don't allow a new massacre and a similar horror that happened, and we still endure all this. and this status quo suits lukashenka, and if he can move the situation, who knows, putin will not be able to do it. everything before lukashenka is much simpler, that's the point. therefore, i believe that everything will be much more difficult there, even if it happens, lukashenka will not be asked. mark,

well, an intimate delicate question, i would not like to spread conspiracy theories, but oleksiy restovych and his strange interview, strange conversation with latynina, i watched this case and my eyes stopped. much more than in latin behind the glasses, even she couldn't stand it anymore. oleksiy began to turn such a thing on the fan, which simply does not fit into the concept in general. so you, as a person who worked with him, spent more than one hour on the air, right? i think you read oleksiy himself very well. in general, i would like to ask you what, in your opinion, is happening with him now. i always, when asked this question, i answer during the period when he was on my airwaves, then there were also some shoals, but this is not what is happening now, for the whole year and a half you could make claims that he

said something wrong, said something wrong, but still it happened in the context of the general position, public opinion of ukraine, the majority at least, fluctuations within the so-called general geopolitical policy of the pro-ukrainian party, in general, yes, you can review all what happened to him next? i said in august, when many criticized me for stopping doing with him programs, the first alarms started already in the summer , they scared and alarmed me a lot, because arestovych declared that he has political ambitions, that he wants to become president, i do not understand how it is possible to become president without presidential elections, they would not have been intended for what a person relied on it, he openly... declares that this is not polishenel's secret. it seems to me that a lot of things were mostly dictated by this, i will criticize the government and thereby earn points for my election campaign, something from...

let's have it, that's how i saw it, and now this cannot be explained, because the position is strange, then he and putin want to sue europe and the west, then he praises lukashenko as a great patriot of his country, then he is sorry, he says: uh, no, everything was wrong, then i scared you, and now i stop scaring you and return to another previous position. such zigzags are incomprehensible to me, i would not make programs with such a person now under any circumstances, what is really happening with arastovich. i don't know, i don't communicate with him until august 2023. many accuse him of being pro-moscow position, and almost in connection with the kremlin or even the fsb. i don't know that. but i want to say that if you chose such a position, then you should be in ukraine. in kyiv, at least, without saying that it is on the front line. it is necessary to take such a position within ukraine, it is right. after all, if you pronounce it at home,

then... trust in you is higher, that is, a person sees that this is how it should be. from abroad it looks somewhat unconvincing, to say the least. if you have such a position, then be kind when you already apply for a position the president of ukraine or the ukrainian politician, you have to do it all at home. if you feel a danger to yourself, then this also explains a lot. why such a change in views occurred, because the question is not that the authorities do not like this position. and why were you an adviser to the president before that, since the war had just started in february? the head of the office, as far as i remember, he was an adviser to the head of the office, something like that was written in the certificate on public grounds, he was a part-time employee, you voiced one position, then another position began in 2023, this is something it scares and it is strange, you either said something that did not

correspond to reality. although he did not say anything so dubious then. let it be two or three weeks already, but this has already become a weighted assessment of his personal opinion. now he says: "zelensky is a corruptor and a dictator." and why didn't you say about it earlier? you saw it when you worked in the president's office. why was he silent then? and this is not your opinion, marko, this is psychology or political technology, this is what works in it now, well, you understand. that it's a question, you know, up to your intuition, i think that first, there is some kind of attempt to manipulate, aristovych does not consider this, he says openly, i do not see a political position here, he has gone through various stages in his biography, it seemed to me that a person has become wiser, he is a little more than 50 years old, a year or two is needed to have a consistent position, i am a person who has never changed my position, for which i have been criticized all my life, i have been

unequivocal all my life and always appreciated it in others, principledness, when a person has the same position, sticks to the same views this does not mean that it is impossible to criticize, to change the attitude towards people. but in the main issues you need to remain who you are. it is impossible if you are a supporter of liberal ideology to become a communist. this is nonsense to me. how to change your views depending on your condition. are you in power or not? why did you go there? you were at public events. i think. that there is some psychological defect in oleksiy aristovych, or something was not added to him, or he believes that he was underestimated, in my opinion, there is something personal here. thank you very much, mark, for this frank and extremely interesting conversation, i want to remind our viewers that mark fegin, an activist of the russian emigration in exile, a former deputy of the state duma of the russian federation and a well-known blogger, was currently working on espresso. thanks mark. thank you, everyone, all the best.