a person can be counted as an accomplice of the russian federation, that is, he implements maidan 3, that is, serhiy rudenko came out, said to the maidan, or roman bezsmertny, a participant of maidan 3, and a dog of the russian federation? well, conversations will always be held, mr. sergiu, and the reason for these conversations is different. it is known that sabotage is being carried out by the enemy, and this can be seen from the actions of the special services and security services. and the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense, which constantly provides facts, these facts are confirmed by subversive work the fsb and the foreign intelligence services of russia and western countries, especially the current situation in poland, france, and germany, this is confirmed by a number of facts that have been published and so on, and from my point of view, when such information appears, it does not... carry confirmation

of documentary, factual or operative actions, it is only a tool of influence on the information space, and as for the fragments that you said, it is obvious that we come from there, and we are not deprived of all these dislocations and in the head and in actions, here we are we all understand very well that there are people, including both in society and in the system of authorities, who sometimes resort to such methods, and we are learning democracy, and building democracy in conditions of war is oh so difficult, oh so difficult, from yes, i do not rule out what you said at all, because well, i have already lived a lot and seen a lot, but if we speak definitively and what can be said in general, then... neither the first, nor the second,

nor the third revolution, and those that will come, no one here in ukraine organized them, from the point of view did not support external influence, they were self-initiative, self-management, political forces, society, and the actual organization of ukrainian society and self-organization and the third sector, in principle, was always an example not only for... the soviet space, but also for the european space, this was noted and noted by all analysts in the world, therefore this is not the case, ukrainian society, which can be manipulated, it is capable of organizing itself and fighting back, including directing those on the path of truth, forgive me for this a biblical phrase: those who are in power do not understand where to look and what to do.

society clearly understands what can be done during martial law and during war, and what can't be done, well, this is also very important, but actually we lived the year 2023 all the time in this discussion, you remember, it was constantly, what is it, then a connecting rod, then some other bisun and so on were developed and tried to be implemented in ukraine, but ukraine withstood it, this confirms the soundness. the spirit of ukrainian society, its understanding of all those processes, which take place both at the front, and intuitive, and understanding, including in international relations. mr. roman, today the deputies of the unrecognized transnistrian republic of moldova at the congress, the so-called congress, of the so-called deputies of various levels, appealed to russia for the protection of the region and warned about possible ...

provocations that could lead to an escalation of tensions, i will quote this document, well , the appeal to russia, the first point reads as follows: appeal to the federation council of the state duma of russia with a request to implement protection measures transnistria under conditions of increased pressure from moldova. more than 220,000 russian citizens live in transnistria. russia participates in the peacekeeping mission on dniester and is a guarantor and mediator in the negotiation process, the congress resolution said. well of course. russia is not a mediator or guarantor in this negotiation process, it is a participant in the conflict and has been for the past 30 years, but the fact that they announced this today, and tomorrow putin delivers his annual message to the federal assembly, in your opinion, can they to be interconnected facts, well, of course , tomorrow we will hear what putin will say, but isn't this a reason for putin to start saying that we will now also return transnistria back, because this is new russia. and also

transnistria, just this will be the boot that we will have in the south and southwest of ukraine, and, accordingly , in the east, east, southeast of moldova. well , firstly, one must be ready for any development of events, and secondly, well, it is obvious that both the numbers mentioned there and the information that preceded it about the possibility there an invitation, a call and so on, like al yanukovych, how he once addressed putin and so on, as you can see, this did not happen, but you must understand that this fact and this... event, it is clearly fabricated under the message, in order to create an additional informational pretext, and i am convinced that this fact will be heard in the message, will be heard, and it will be very densely

advertised, scattered all over the world by the information powers of fuhrer moskovsky, this is also obvious . thing at the same time it is clear that what is happening now in transnistria, the activation of chauvinist russian forces, transnistrian separatists, it is primarily connected with a widespread informational and psychological attack on ukraine, now please note that the situation at the front, it has also shaken information. psychological attack on ukraine , and this is one of the components, including this and the attack, that is, here we need to think about organizational countermeasures, and against operational-tactical countermeasures, and against and also

work with psychological tools so that ukrainian society to explain the components of what these devilish transnistrians are. the chauvinists are russian , and it is necessary to explain to the partners in the west, and it is obvious that this requires special attention and help to moldova, because president sandu is under constant attack by the führer of moscow, and by the chauvinists who have now settled there, russian chauvinists who have settled there in transnistria, so it is multi-component. a thing to which one must relate, but with a calculated counteraction, a planned counteraction, and here in no case can one reflect, but we must be prepared for the fact that all these components will be implemented by the moscow führer using the fact of events in

transnistria. mr. roman, the moldovan government believes that the so-called transnistrian congress of deputies and its decisions do not pose a threat of escalation and destabilization. calling this meeting a purely propaganda event, one can evaluate differently, of course , what happened in the so-called transnistrian republic of moldova, but can moldova officially appeal to ukraine with a request to help settle the issue transnistria, that is, it is clear that now russia does not have the opportunity to help the military contingent. which is located on the territory of the transnistrian republic of moldova, there seem to be about 7,000 military personnel, well, different figures are called, there are 6,5, 7,000, and there are large warehouses of ammunition, could ukraine

solve the issue of moldova and its own, because this contingent , which is located there, although it is small, but it is still a threat to the southern, southern regions of ukraine. there in the sausage town, that's what it's called, where are these the former formations are located somewhere, if you put everything together, in the vicinity of 500 military personnel, but only 1,500 of them are those people who are trained, able to participate in some actions, that is why what is written, it is usually either exaggerated, or is reduced to impossibility. the real situation in fact, it is quite, let's say, balanced for moldova, especially since the government of moldova received during the last year quite serious assistance with equipment and weapons in order

to keep this enclave in the appropriate status, now regarding the appeal, definitely this there may be an appeal, but it depends on... the government of moldova, on the interaction, on the dialogue between the government of ukraine and the government of moldova, what will be the answer? well, here it is necessary to weigh all the pros and cons, and... as far as i know, the dialogue two years ago, and a year ago, was very dense, and the ukrainian general directorate of intelligence constantly informs the people of chisinau about the course of events, moreover, about this and head of the ministry of defense gur spoke several times, including his last contact with the mass media, where he spoke about possible actions of the assembly of deputies of all ranks. and about the extent to which the appeal to putin will be, what it will be, what it will be in terms of content,

that is, in fact, there is interaction here at the level of special services, especially since the prime minister of moldova is a former head of the security services, and an adviser on of security, has the office of the president of moldova, the former, that is, in fact, we can talk about the fact that ukraine, as far as i know. from the point of view of operational-tactical cooperation , it cooperates quite strongly with the government of moldova. as for the fate of this republic and these of all people, here ukraine defends the need to comply with international legal norms and the principle of moldova's sovereignty, that is, its territorial integrity, and therefore, if the official government of the republic of moldova needs help, and they

will ask for this help, well it is clear that the ukrainian leadership will consider it and make a decision, because similar actions, which are currently taking place in transnistria, carry the signs of a threat to ukraine, and these are all singing along to the moscow führer in conditions when ukraine is at war. with moscow, this may be perceived by the government of ukraine as a certain threat, so it is obvious that ukraine should take appropriate steps , especially since ukraine, in accordance with the agreements that were signed between teraspol and chisinau, is a participant in this dialogue and guarantor of this dialogue, therefore in this case. ukraine can take all necessary steps as a participant in this process. mr.

roman, on february 26, emmanuel macron met with the leaders of european states in paris, one of the statements that came out of the french president in the discussion was that that he does not exclude the fact that the troops of nato member countries may be on the territory of ukraine, caused a stormy reaction from everyone. well , the first thing in russia, of course, and in the world as well, the white house announced that they do not plan to send the troops of the united states of america to fight in ukraine, let's listen to what john kirby said. well, that's a sovereign decision that each nato member would have to make on their own. you heard how secretary general stoltenberg himself said that there are no plans or intentions, certainly under the auspices of nato, understand. troops on the ground, and president biden from the very beginning of this conflict clearly stated

that there will be no us troops on the territory of ukraine to carry out combat tasks. well, the minister of foreign affairs of lithuania, gabrielus lansbergis, believes that it is worth thinking about macron's idea about the possibility of the allies deploying ground troops on ukrainian territory. let's listen, sorry, it is decided on the battlefield in ukraine, in times like those we live in, political leadership, ambition and determination to think unconventionally, initiative will be very necessary yesterday's meeting in paris deserves attention, mr. roman, when macron talks about the fact that the troops of nato member countries can be on the territory of ukraine, it is not about the participation of nato as an alliance in participation. in the russian-ukrainian war, we are talking about the fact that this will not be a consensus decision, but each state can decide and say that we

are sending some military contingent to the territory of ukraine, or in this situation, for example, if lithuania entered some contingent on the territory of ukraine, and if russia attacks lithuania, accordingly, uh, how to be in this situation, that is , lithuania made this decision independently, and nato should be responsible for... is there no contradiction here? and mr. serhiy, we talked about this topic with you, do you remember, once in ukraine everyone insisted that nato countries cannot provide assistance and interact with ukraine on the basis of... bilateral agreements, and we then with you came to the position that it is possible, it is not prohibited by the nato charter. moreover, in the situation now described, most precisely, most precisely, paradoxically, well, this sometimes happens, it was described by this political

animal, the prime minister of slovakia, robert fico, he. analyzing, he said that individual nato states are considering the issue of sending troops to ukraine based on bilateral agreements, and further he says that this gives him goosebumps, but this is the right of every state. now regarding the option. which you are talking about: first, if we take the military countries of nato, and this was demonstrated today, in particular, by the chief the headquarters of the netherlands troops, saying that any variant of the development of events should not be discounted, and one should be prepared

for any development of events, including the one about which... this language, it will be found now , that now it is necessary to equip, he is talking about this and send troops to ukraine, but we must be ready for any development of events, regarding whether, on the basis of bilateral agreements, nato countries, including, can deploy troops to ukraine, i still once i want to say, no one, not a single document denies such a possibility, moreover... if you look at the already signed agreements with countries on cooperation in the field of security, there are no direct indications of this, but it is there from the content, because any agreement, apart from the fact that it has a formal side , it also has a meaning and is interpreted as a whole, there from the meaning follows the probability and possibility of such

a course of events, it is not an obligation, but it is... a probable option, i emphasize this, moreover, this option cannot be canceled including nato. it is decided in accordance with the national legislation, constitutions of all countries that concluded similar agreements with ukraine. now , the likely scenario that you said that, and if in the case of such a scenario, the führer... of moscow would attack any member of nato in response. in this case, there is an unequivocal requirement of the fifth article of the charter of the north atlantic bloc to protect any state, and it is absolutely irrelevant how the fuhrer of moscow and his clique

will interpret the event and the behavior of lithuania and estonia. latvia or any nato member in the event that they provide ukraine to ukraine as appropriate military assistance to the state based on bilateral agreements. therefore, from my point of view, this shriek, which has now started from the pope to washington, is only a political shriek, and if we talk about the military headquarters of the armed forces and... and within the framework of nato, and national governments, and including the pentagon, then none of them exclude such an option. moreover, if you carefully read the article of the washington post, which is called last week, what americans have learned from ukrainians, then there, including

it is noted that only direct participation in similar events can. to give serious skills in order to lead the conditions, to lead a war in the current conditions, so it is obvious, and this has been known for a long time, that most countries not only conduct training, but also analyze the development of events on the russian-ukrainian front, and even build separate operational-tactical actions based on what is happening on the russian-ukrainian front. and now even individual headquarters are staffing new units, based on the lessons that these states take and study. the situation on the russian-ukrainian front, from here it becomes obvious to me that the question of involving troops on the basis of bilateral

agreements, of nato countries to participate in countering russian aggression, is only a matter of time, and this shriek, which has now arisen, is only evidence that the european parliament elections are ahead. everyone is trying to make ends meet so as not to fall, but the situation with the threat of the russian aggressor will very quickly bring to mind those who do not understand the thesis that was recently voiced that there is an opportunity to stop the aggressor in ukraine, if someone does not understand this, then it will stop at his home, by the way, and mr. roman , do they understand in poland that... ukraine is now stopping the aggressor, because we can now see a rather wide panorama of what is happening in the bilateral relations between ukraine and poland, and it looks quite

unacceptable and ugly, because in poland the roads leading to the ukrainian border are blocked, our government officials for some reason go to the ukrainian border to meet with donald tusk, who did not go there, today tusk said that he is ready to make difficult decisions in order not to ... was of unnecessary tension, but we must find a long-term solution and said that he can temporarily completely close the border for ukrainian goods, although taras kachka denied this statement today, by the way , how do you look at this situation and what has been done in this story right and what is wrong and who is right and who is guilty? from my point of view, and polish politicians should open their jobs. from bignim byzhzhynskyi, it is described in great detail that the future stability of eurasia depends on the strength

of the military-political-economic union of the four countries: france, germany, poland and ukraine. what is currently happening in poland, as fsb saboteurs... turn the behavior of polish protesters, both against ukraine and against germany, shows that in moscow these textbooks were read, in warsaw they were forgotten, and therefore periodically all these people need to be reminded of all these things regarding the tactics of solving the current issue with the protesting farmers. then the answer to it must be formed in brussels, because the pretext is the formal pretext of these protests, there are a number of decisions that were taken

within the framework of the european union, regarding the so-called common agricultural policy, but this policy provided for the decisions of the relevant procedural decisions within the framework of national governments, that... a part, and today it must be said honestly, the majority of european governments slept through this moment, and appropriate adaptive steps were not taken and led to the fact that it shook farmers' protests, because as you know, they took place starting from december last year and are still happening now, and this in the conditions and... conducting and preparing, preparing and introducing an election campaign to the european parliament carries a very huge threat, so

it is obvious that this requires a corresponding meeting within the framework of the european government, the european council, and such a meeting, last monday, already began to take place, where tactical steps for the introduction of joint are discussed. policies within the european union. its main components, which annoy farmers the most, are the so-called green agreement, the content of which is primarily the processes of decarbonization, minimization of mineral fertilizers, all kinds of poisonous substances and so on. the next is the introduction of organic methods of agriculture, which minimizes. the use of chemistry and so on, and bringing the balance of the use of land resources of each state, let me remind you that in accordance with

international standards... the destructibility of soil in the territory of any state should not exceed 30%. to date , a number of european countries have crossed the 50 and 60% mark a long time ago, which can actually lead to an environmental disaster. but what i am now i tell you, no one ever explained to the farmers, did not organize with them. appropriate work, moreover, the european union for all this, including the processes of decarbonization, the transition to organic farming, provided payments, payments are provided for young farmers, even for farmers, women, even for farmers, women, managers, where for each head of cattle, from a goat to a cow, sheep, including for each hectare of land in

dependence. according to the type of agriculture , appropriate subsidies are provided, i, when for all this i look, and i know very well that a ukrainian farmer , who does not receive a single penny of such money, would long ago have envied such help, which is provided by the european union and national governments, to the farmers of european countries, i am not talking about things that concern individual and ... tariffs, for electricity, special prices, for fuel for agriculture, mr. serhiy, i apologize for taking up your time, but i just want all of us to understand that there is no fsb inside these protests got away because what they they write and hang on these banners, there is absolutely no relation to the real situation. thank you, mr. roman, for

the conversation. it was roman bezsmertny, politician, diplomat, former ambassador of ukraine to the republic of belarus. friends, we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, and at the same time there and there we are conducting a poll, we are asking you about whether russia is capable of provoking maidan 3 in ukraine. if you are on youtube, everything is quite simple, yes, no, or write your version of the answer under this stream, and if you're watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone and vote if you think russia can provoke. no 0800 211382 all calls to these numbers are free, call, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we will be in touch with my colleague, tetyana vysotska, who works in strasbourg. congratulations tatyana. a session of the european parliament took place today, during which the issues of the future and

future security were considered. many statements by the leaders of european countries, as to whether they will whether they will send troops to ukraine or not, obviously we are talking about the creation of a new european security architecture, perhaps a little separate from nato, because trump's statements, as i understand it, scared many in europe that at some point the united states of america will not stand up for the countries , which are part of... the north atlantic alliance, tell tetiana how this discussion was conducted today, and actually, what was agreed upon, or not agreed upon, but what are they agreeing on? and yes, actually today's security debate in the session hall of the european parliament proved that the european union is now absolutely in a state of disarray and is seriously trying to prepare for putin's possible invasion of the territory of the european union. today, speaking in the session hall.

the president of the european commission, ursela fonden, probably for the first time in my memory, so diplomatically but clearly stated: "war between the european union and russia is something possible." i will even quote her directly, she stated: "the threat of war is probably not inevitable, but it is not impossible." there should be no risk of war to exaggerate, but we must be ready for them - said ursula funderlajen, and in connection with this, just this new architecture. security of the european union, the eu plans to build over the next five years. ursula fondeyan stressed that europe must wake up urgently and said that europe itself is already waking up, because this year the defense spending of the european union states is 20% higher than last year, and also ursula fondeyan announced the news that in the coming days the european commission will submit proposals for the creation of the first in history

which strategy of the defense-industrial complex with a corresponding investment plan, and this strategy will give priority to joint long-term defense purchases, so that every... year the european union becomes stronger and stronger. ursela fonden also confirmed the news that the next european commission will have a new position, the european commissioner for defense. sergey tatiana, even today president zelensky spoke in tirana and...