his insanity is obvious from the first day, so it makes no sense to comment on him, and this is his sore point, to make a new world order, which from his point of view, when russia will rule the whole world and decide for itself, will be the most important in the world, whom he wants to destroy, whom he wants to support, well, this is a fantasy, a phantasmagoria, the 84th year beyond the urals , no one will build it now, it is simply impossible, and such systems as there are in russia , despite the fact that they are extremely dangerous, but together with the extremely weak. and do not have potential in order to have a perspective , by the way, at the very end to confirm your words, i will say that today there was information from bloomberg that india will look for new sources of oil imports because it is afraid of sanctions from the united states of america, and empty the ports are big in china, which used to be overcrowded, because also the sanctions, well, since there is an understanding that there was some support, obviously from russia, well, this is what hits the pocket, it shows once again that, well... maybe the fight

for markets is really more aggressive, but it can give a greater result, and russia will eventually sell oil with a surcharge from itself. thank you very much for joining, mykola knyazhytskyi was with us, a people's deputy of ukraine, we discussed current political topics, and i will remind you of the question that we voiced, we asked you today and we continue to ask whether a new world order is possible without an aggressive russia, yes or no, let's see how you vote. if i see well, yes, well, at the end there will be results, well, you see the phones, i will not repeat, i think that everyone, everyone is fine see the screen of your gadget or tv or where you watch the verdict program, well, now we are moving to the military topic, which is also very important, because the question, let's say, do we shoot down planes, is probably the question that most often comes up in conversations today, even between people who are far, as they say, from the battlefield and from military topics in general. mykhailo samus, military expert,

deputy director of the army, conversion and disarmament research center, director of the new geopolitics research network, mr. mykhailo, i congratulate you, i congratulate you, well, there are 13 planes there in how many, in 10 days, if i’m not mistaken, this is how we have such a harvest of russian aviation, one version is that we are spending it now, as they say, already to the bottom the patriot missile for patriottv nasamsiv, secondly, that it is s... it is said that it is some ukrainian system that no one knows about, and fourthly , they say that after all it is an f-16 in the sky of ukraine, just no one knows about it it doesn't tell us, your opinion, well, my opinion is that it doesn't matter what they're shooting down, the main thing is that it's happening, the main thing is that the ukrainian army, the air force, stop, or at least try to...

influence the use of cabs by russia, because in reality, this is really good news, but what is behind it is not very good. russia continues not only to reduce, but to increase the use of corrected aerial bombs, it can use about 150 aerial bombs per day, this is a huge number that greatly affects the conduct of offensive operations by russia and defensive operations. ukraine, i hope that these effective strikes against russian aviation ukrainian air force, they will now reduce the use of cabs, although on the other hand, we clearly understand that before the so-called election of putin, russia will throw in any resources, including super-expensive planes, which they do not have time to produce at those rates, with which ukraine knocks them down, but between the one whom putin is most interested in, or the people who stand around putin, the main thing is that on...

the maximum possible result, the most beautiful, let's say, a beautiful process, is recorded, so if we talk about , what is beaten, i think that after all, this is not an f-16, but it is an anti-aircraft missile system that can really achieve such a result in various combinations. you know, i'm not joking, i'll just say what's obvious, i think everyone saw the video, well, the real video was when... the ukrainian military filmed with the help of a drone how a certain flying ob an object, a flying object, which could not be determined, because something was hanging in the sky, and well, it's not a fake, it's just that i 'm not saying it, and you know, such thoughts are already said, that it's obvious that some extraterrestrial civilizations are helping us, or some other such thing, of course, i'm trying to lighten the mood a little here, but you see these videos now, well , it's hard to understand what it is, isn't it? something

is falling, or is it flying, well, it's definitely not a phosphorus bomb, but some such anomaly in the sky was filmed, here i'll say again, no, and now you're also seeing a video, recorded by the armed forces of ukraine. some certain unidentified aircraft, which really did not fly there, it was hanging in the air, you know, here now i understand what is here it is useless to say that they contributed to this, but i will tell you this, my grandfather fought in the second world war and then i was still very young. in heaven, i would like to... comment on what you know, people will say, well, i have to say that everything can be, or is it some kind of simple, something like that gave people, well, we can't explain everything, we are limited in our intelligence, in fact, we develop, at least in the facts of limitation, that is, in knowledge

humanity, which is limited, that is, i really read a certain analysis of american experts and researchers on this matter, that indeed the american army often... can record such and such phenomena, but there was an explanation that these are some really natural phenomena, that is, it it is possible to somehow explain some warm air , cold air there, but in principle, again, it is difficult to confirm everything, and let's hope that someday we will reach, maybe with the help of artificial intelligence , we will reach such a level of analysis that it is clear that this so, well, the pentagon at least provided a video where there was something like that, and there were also rumors... in the senate, they heard from the military who had similar experiences, they reported to the senators, but in any case, if something flies there and somewhere helps us to shoot down russian planes, well, suddenly, we are only for, absolutely, i will now quote the general of the syrian commander, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine,

he, after visiting the area of ​​combat operations in the avdiiv and kurakhiv directions, where fierce battles continue, praised the fighters for the third time assault brigade and the 25th separate airborne brigade, which knocked out the enemy from the outskirts of orlivka and promised to allocate additional reserves to the avdiiv direction. i quote: during the work, some commanders were found to have certain miscalculations in mastering the situation and assessing the enemy, which directly affected the stability of the defense in certain directions. i took all measures to correct the situation in the city by allocating additional resources, ammunition, and material resources, as well as the necessary supplies. reserves, well actually let's talk about syrsky's visit now , like you, well here, he is probably in a very hot phase right now, it's somehow difficult to evaluate, but still, syrsky's arrival in this position in such a responsible period, which would have come anyway, should have been exit from avdiyivk,

anyway it should have been with zaluzhny or with syrskyi, how do you evaluate his leadership and here is his constant stay there, in fact, with some exceptions, where the front line is, how effective it is. well, at the moment , of course, it is too early to talk about the effectiveness or not inefficiency. in principle, when syrsko was appointed to the position, everyone agreed that he is one of the most experienced generals, perhaps the most experienced general of the ukrainian army, and therefore his level of professionalism, his professionalism does not cause any doubts to anyone, that is why he is acting now actively at the forefront, some criticize it, i, for example, support it, that in such a hot phase, when the format of hostilities is really changing now, in general, the 24th year is critical from the point of view of the situation on the battlefield, in the conditions , when we were stopped assistance from the united states, we understand that there is a constant shortage of ammunition and other

resources, and therefore the presence of the commander, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, who, in principle, is trying to figure out the situation himself, so that it does not happen later that... for some reason, there are no prepared lines in some directions or insufficient attention to engineering, engineering preparation of the territory, or, for example, there are no reserves, and his presence and control over the actions of the commanders, i believe that this is quite the right thing, in principle, now he is forming his not only management system, and its management atmosphere, let's say, an ecosystem, that is , all commanders must clearly understand the requirements of the commander, the commander-in-chief, having heard accordingly... perhaps it is better not through any orders from him personally, i think that this will create a more effective the work of lower-level commanders , well, the main thing is, you know, it is difficult to evaluate here yet, but the main thing is to understand that he did not lose the helm, and taking it, well, at the will of the president, at the will

of the president in fact, and i believe, i believe that now there is so much management going on , including the organized exit, although of course there are some problems with implementation even now... although it seems to many that now some incomprehensible process is going on, when the russians are pressing, and the ukrainian troops are withdrawing. in fact, a controlled process is underway, when ukrainian troops are taking really prepared positions even now. once it is being prepared, that is, if you look at the map there, you can roughly say where the new front line will pass, because it is determined, among other things, by the geography of the area, there you cannot just stand in the field, even if you create some fortification lines of defense there, it is still better to use the characteristics of the terrain, the features of the terrain, and just there to create more effective defensive lines, which are actually being formed now, well... i want you to comment this tragic story of losses and there is some

knowledge about the reasons, but again , people who have certain information and understanding of the situation in general should comment here, in the special operations forces of the armed forces of ukraine , they reported that during the execution of combat task in the clash with the russian occupiers died heroically, having accepted the battle , the soldiers of the 73rd naval center of special operations, according to the military edition, it is about the battle of february 28. during the landing of groups in the occupied territories of the kherson region in the area of ​​tendrivska kosa, well, here, well, i ask you to comment on what you know, how you see this story, because you know, there is just a lot of hate and hype, and that that should not be in such a situation, especially since the vast majority of these people definitely do not understand the work of the sso and what could have happened there, well, the main thing is that the special operations forces, that is, the operations of the special operations forces are... always beyond the limit, i would say, not even at the limit of risk, but beyond the limit of risk, that is,

they are always operations behind the front line, these are always critical operations, i.e., as a rule, special operations forces perform tasks for the implementation of a specific influence, let's say, or on high-value enemy targets, or on the preparation of certain territories, creating conditions there for conducting or extended operations ssso, or for the preparation of more... operations of other units of the armed forces of ukraine, therefore the fact that there was a landing on the territory occupied by the enemy, this is the functionality of the ssso, why such a situation occurred when our group was discovered and the battle began, it's already a real problem, because the csos have to work in such a way that they can't be detected, it's extremely difficult to do that now, it's a little bit different than it was even 20 or 30 years ago. because there are drones constantly hanging in the air, which also work at night, all the time

technical means of intelligence , coverage of the situation work very tightly, and therefore conducting such covert operations, they are always very complex, as our group was discovered, of course, these are all details that will never be revealed, this is actually part of the functionality of special operations forces, and errors should also be resolved. draw conclusions within the structure and, of course, learn these lessons so that this does not happen again, but in reality, the operations of special operations forces are always, well, very risky and can always face such situations, the most important thing is that conclusions should be drawn, eternal honor and memory to the heroes who gave their lives in this battle with the enemy. in an interview with cbs news, the head of the main intelligence department, kyrylo budana, correctly called the decision of zelensky, the president of ukraine and the supreme commander-in-chief, to dismiss the chief ex-commander valery zaluzhny from

the post of commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine. i will quote. if everything is good and everything is great and everything is done right, then why are we in the situation we are in that edition of the word budanov. and why am i asking this anyway, because i see even in the comments, our viewers write: why is it budanov commenting on zuluzhny, or why is it budanov commenting on zelenskyi's decision. why is this so? and how do you explain his words? well , he was asked for... a question, he commented, here, here logically, he was answering a journalist's question, in fact, well, in principle, my hypothesis is quite similar, when there was this active phase, let's say, of the replacement of commanders-in-chief, and when journalists me they asked me what i thought, i said yes hypothetically, i can assume that when zelensky was now assessing the situation for the 24th year and for the 25th year, and i emphasize... in my opinion, the 24th year is decisive from the point of view of the possibility of this chance for the armed forces

of ukraine change the situation, ah, and general zaluzhnyi in his essay to cnn, when you remember, he published and said that he needed 5 months for the technological rearmament of the armed forces and plus certain resources, it is obvious that this could not suit president zelensky , and general syrsky could, for example, say that he can... to offer certain options for conducting operations, including with limited resources, which can change the situation at the front. well, general zaluzhnyi had his chance in the 23rd year, when he conducted... a counter-offensive, now general syrskyi got a chance in the 24th year, in principle, i don't see any problems here at all, we are talking about the intrinsic value of ukraine, that is, we are now talking about finding the most effective manager , the most effective options for the development of the situation so that we do not get into in the 25th year, we are trapped, when we will simply be

put at the table of surrender, i would say so, not even negotiations. capitulation with russia, which was talked about, including trump , who can quite likely win the negotiations, so in the 24th year we need to do our best so that when trump comes to power, he has no chance to start putting us at the table of capitulation , still help us to continue, and this is possible if we achieve success in the 24th year, therefore , in principle, the logic of budanov's answer is clear. he says that if we are in a difficult situation in our country, then indeed, maybe part of the responsibility lies with the commander-in-chief luzhnoye, this is logical, budanov knows more, we can only assume the specifics of this situation, well, in any case, i we still have a few minutes here, i would like you to give your comment

on putin's statement, today he said a lot, and he also talked about weapons, russian dictator vladimir. putin said that the strategic nuclear forces of the russian federation are on full alert readiness and once again boasted about the development of new weapons. let's listen to the aggressor, and then discuss. thus, the kinzhal hypersonic aviation complex is not only put into service, but also used with high efficiency to attack particularly important targets during the svo. also, a blow was already used in the battle. hypersonic complex of sea-based zircon, which was not even mentioned in the message of 2018, but this system is already in service. hypersonic blocks of intercontinental range avangard and peresvet laser complexes. tests of the burevisnyk unlimited-range cruise missile and

the poseidon unmanned aerial vehicle are being completed. these systems have confirmed their high, one can say without. we will soon demonstrate them in the areas of the base on combat duty, there such old men sleep when putin talks about his petrels, well, in any case , to whom is he addressing, to ukraine or to the world, talking about petrels, sarmatians, mace, voivode and all their other rockets, well, this is a traditional set of his such... facts, which he is proud, apparently, this is basically a pre-election, pre-election speech like this, and therefore it is still an appeal more to the slaves, but of course he demonstrates the west, and there were also remarks regarding macron's statement that those who declare that some there, the troops

will be used against russia, they may regret and so on, there will be tragic consequences, that is, he intimidates, of course, the west, which is included... in such a way that he functions today, but in reality, of course, it was also a demonstration to his slaves that everything ok, svo continues, weapons are fired, and targets will be achieved, although there is little he can say about the front, because there are actually no such victories that can be boasted of at such a strategic level, he very, very briefly touched on the successes at the front there somehow in passing. well, yes, indeed, addressing a country that occupies one-sixth or one -fifth of the land mass, and telling this country with a population of 140 million that in four months you were able to capture avdiivka, the district center or not even the district center, well probably really and there you are fighting for an eagle with a thin one, there are three houses, two streets, so obviously,

obviously it is definitely not, thank you very much for joining, thank you for your comments, mykhailo samus was with us, expert, deputy director of the center research on the army of conversions and disarmament, the director of the new geopolitics research network, he was in touch with us on the air, and now we will look again, i will remind you of the survey, we will collect the results of the survey at the end of our air, and at the end of our weather will be in 20 minutes. so, is a new world order possible without aggressive russia? yes or no, you can vote, i will say again in latin, this is the novus ordum secloruum. the new world order, everyone always said that there are some secret forces that are building this new world order, a secret government, the government of the 13, there's the anonaki, that's it, but it's really just the rules of the game. by which the world that wants to live, develop and definitely not disappear as a result of ecological or nuclear cataclysms should live by, well, actually closer to this topic, volodymyr yelchenko, diplomat, ex-representative

of ukraine under the organization of the united nations in 15-19 years, then the former ambassador of ukraine to the usa in the 20-21 years was engaged in this, mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, good evening, of course we will mention putin today, but i i will ask you more about what we should expect from johnson and his team. some help to ukraine, well, but still, and let's start with putin's address to the world, first of all, because everyone is watching, despite the fact that he says a lot of clinical things, but it is worth understanding whether there is more aggression, or more than that, let's somehow agree, because we will not be sovereign and strong, and then you will all die, and without russia you will not be able to, how do you comment on the diplomatic point of view, if you can say so, putin's statement today, there was no more war were there more conversations about... that he doesn't mind talking about something on his own terms, of course. well, i personally heard only aggression. moreover, the aggression was so

weak. well, if you can combine these two concepts. it reminded me of such, you know, performance, well, brezhnev is somewhere in the middle the period of the former soviet union in the 70s, that is, not yet late, but not early either. not yet decline, but no longer development, something in the middle, and actually speaking, i was paying attention to the faces of those people who were sitting further, well, besides the fact that they are all potential clients of the future international tribunal in gaza, although there are very many of them there a lot, i think that no tribunal can handle so many people, but for some of them those who... sat in the first rows, they will definitely be clients of this tribunal if they live, of course, and somehow i didn't see a lot of optimism on these faces, well, there were thunderous

applauses that arose from time to time, they were also so, well, rather artificial, and again, there were no smiles on the faces, well, actually , and the whole situation is such that... which did not set us up for any joy there or any kind of equality, well, what putin said, we did not hear anything new, all this has already been said thousands of times, at least during the last 10 years there, eh -uh, well, you know, my main impression is that uh, well you know, the impression is that he tried in every possible way to avoid the topic of the war in ukraine, well , what

do they call it... territory of ukraine , even if they do not consider it an aggression, but a so-called special military operation, but the fact that three more planes were shot down today, two yesterday, already 13 in a week, eh, and putin talks about heroism and that a new generation of soldiers is growing up, who are the future of russia and so on, that is, this completely disconnected from reality , quite a lot was said about nato, but also somehow so frivolously and not specifically, well, again , we did not hear any new threats, all these storm clouds, zircons and everything else, again, we watched these cartoons before , i think that it didn't scare anyone, and it didn't make anyone in the hall happy either... so my impression is that it was a rather average performance, he didn't say anything new. i don't

know who it was all aimed at, well , it's clear that this was the oath of the dogdal meetings, that is, first of all, it was about internal issues, and in fact, the majority of the speech, after the introduction of such an international one, was concerned with internal issues, i don't want to talk about it at all, that is, let the russians analyze it there. how their well -being is growing and so on, we see this from those tv channels that show it, not russian, i mean alternative ones, so that what was related, well, if it was such a message to the world, then it it didn't work unequivocally, and by the way, the recent interview with takir kamson, on which huge hopes in russia were based. but it is also in a day or two was forgotten and no one remembers about this or about the interview or about khan anymore, i think that this message will be forgotten in one or two days, and in any case... in this case, we

in ukraine should not contact it is a special attention, because you will not find anything particularly new there. here, by the way, it is important, well, he actually suggested to the united states what can be said, because a sovereign without a sovereign, strong russia, the world order will not take place, it will not be stable, although, again, once again, perhaps the persian empire said that without the persian empire there will be no sovereign strong world order, then the roman empire, then maybe also... khremog, timur, timurlan, they could also say that, well, but everything disappeared over time, somehow a new world appeared, and without these empires it, this the world order existed, but here is a very important phrase, we will now move on to macron, because he finally, in my opinion, said the phrase aljager kumalager, and decided that, well, in war , it is in a military way, and then we must fight, this phrase,

by the way very... caused a lot of excitement both with a plus sign and with a sign, let's talk now macron, good, because it is important, and lloyd austin’s statement is also important, just recently he made a statement about the war in ukraine, i will ask you to comment on it, but macron did not disappoint, that is interesting, he does not disappoint, he does not say: i didn't mean that, you know, but you simply translated my words incorrectly, i didn't say that we will send troops to ukraine, no, i meant that someday, perhaps, some of our troops will be able to train ukrainians on the territory poland, no, he... said that my statements about western troops in ukraine were considered and thought out, i wasn't uh , i wasn't drunk and i wasn't under the influence of anything, but i said it consciously, and if he says so, then obviously this conversation already took place, as you think, and this is an unexpected turn from macron's side, has he really thought it through, talked with whomever is necessary and is ready to act further here, i don't think it was... it was

impromptu, of course, a person like the french president, or macron, or another person in his place simply does not say anything. i think it's an attempt to show france's leadership, uh if we look at the evolution of france's position over the past two years, well, from almost nothing, that is , such a very serious caution, remember how many times macron tried, and not only tried, he called putin. well, two years ago , he tried to talk with him literally every day, tried to propose some peace initiatives there after he was convinced that it was all hopeless, he began to change, his position began to change and, accordingly, the position of the whole of france, that is, the french government , and today macron is trying to recover leadership, if we take into account the fact that, well

, within nato in france. there was always such a very special position, on the one hand, they even left at one time, well then it was called the military part of nato, remained in the political union, then returned, then france was one of those countries that stood at the origin of the idea of ​​creating european forces security, or the european army, such a military wing of the european one. union ee, and now, i think that he, he is trying not just to return the leadership of france in all these issues, but to really take the initiative and show an example to other countries, after all, france is, you know, also a former empire, but of course, without all the features that are characteristic of russia today, some other former empires, eh, and and...

and france would very much like to regain such real leadership, not on paper, but real leadership in europe and perhaps in the whole world, and macron sees that the weaker position of the united states of america, which is natural before the presidential elections and all those problems with the aid package and everything else, confrontation between republicans and democrats, it also does not go unnoticed. and he is trying, well, to occupy this niche , let's say, security, the leadership of this niche, that is, to show that france is ready to go much further and stronger than anyone might think about it, so, well, again, given the caution of france's position , which was at...