should give kyiv the right to strike at legitimate targets on the territory of the russian federation. there are two concepts that prevent nato and primarily the united states from making this decision. the first is what they call escalation, especially uncontrolled escalation. in the minds of the americans, uncontrolled escalation is a mandatory use of nuclear weapons. the second problem that exists is the direct involvement of nato in the fighting, which in principle leads in the end to an uncontrolled escalation. our. the task of explaining to nato: firstly, the assessment is not entirely accurate of reality, secondly, the escalation is controlled. vadym prystayko, for three years, from 2020 to 2023, was the extraordinary and plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to great britain. it was this country that was the first to publicly grant kyiv the right to strike legal targets on the territory of the russian federation with british weapons. this was stated by the minister of foreign affairs of this country, david cameron. great britain was much more from the start. advanced in this process and ready

to act, you will remember that one of the countries that directly warned us, having for great britain had this intelligence and other abilities and capabilities. i remember that we came with boris johnson as prime minister, i accompanied him on february 8, that is, literally two weeks before the start of the war, and the conversation was, among other things , about missiles, about the ability to strike where we need to. we didn't think about impressions on russian territory at the time, but the fact that britain was there from the beginning, obviously they have a reserve for... flexibility, they were the first with us then, they gave the first missiles, the first tanks, they always understand that this leads to the next step of escalation, to the next level of escalation. this gun is located in the immediate vicinity of the ukrainian-russian border, but neither it nor other larger-caliber means that the armed forces received from the west can fire at legitimate targets on the territory of russia, and this... this american m101 gun

is precisely you can't call it modern, it's written in the 53rd, it's much older now, yes, maybe my grandfather had a chipratuse, yes, such a gun, there were even older ones, there in the 47th, in my opinion, somehow or other older, but the age of the gun is not subject to restrictions, 105mm projectiles. at most, they fly a little further than 11 km, and this caliber is very helpful, first of all, to the infantry, but what is the difference, the main thing is that there are muzzles and we shoot at them, whether it is russia or ukraine, in principle, i do not see the difference, all that in the radius of our cannon's reach, that's what we hit, well, we can't take heavy equipment so hard to knock it down there or scare it and that's it. well, we are on combat

duty now, there is no such rest here, here at any moment you can go to the cannon and to carry out my combat task, i have more than 170 shells, that’s for what interval, in a day, it happened that from 4 in the morning to 9:80 shells, such a number of shells fired, these are memories of battles, including under the audio booth, it was from there the unit was transferred to the border. the fighters of this calculation have been fighting for more than one and a half years, but with the existing ban on strikes on military facilities of the urf, it is impossible to realize the full potential of weapons in defensive battles near the border, well, we have not felt much yet, we have dug there, and there is so much we haven't worked here yet and somehow we didn't get into trouble, as they say, while we still have more or less, well, you can hear the cabs flying and all this noise is going on, that's understandable of course. what

's going on there permission is necessary for the use of any western weapons, but in this context the position of the us is important, if only because the main part of weapons, equipment and ammunition comes from washington. in addition, the position of the white house can affect other countries. so far, the main long-range strike capabilities of the ukrainians are again drones. they allow you to apply the maximum damage in that part of the front where the enemy is in principle. does not expect this, we fly into the rear, we fly into narrow places in the enemy's defenses and can inflict very painful and deadly blows. we are dambila belgrade for ourselves, when it was not yet mainstream, when after the kharkiv counteroffensive we launched drones there with special gifts. it is clear that back then the technologies were not as efficient as they are developed today. i know a lot.

ukrainian manufacturers who make beautiful complexes and battlefields, and well, deep diving into er territory of the enemy, but we would like to get from ... western partners, real systemic, expensive things that can be more effective in our conditions today. the stupidity of this policy has long been known to military experts, i think it is now clear to people without expertise in the field of war, because now you can see how it hurts. kharkiv is 30 km from russia, people understand that many people die in kharkiv because of this... bad policy, i think they understand that because of this policy russia has been more successful on the ground, especially in the northeast, and that is one reason, perhaps the main reason, that the administration is now under increasing pressure to change this policy. in recent

weeks, there have been several statements that it is necessary to allow ukraine to use foreign weapons on its territory. russia, such a step was supported by nato secretary general jen stoltenberg. sweden has already allowed ukraine to do this, as a matter of fact, it transferred a small number of long-range archer sauvs to kyiv. as for the states, there is a part government representatives are also in favor. for example, speaker of the house of representatives mike johnson, as well as secretary of state anthony blinken. he visited kyiv not so long ago. the new york times wrote about his position. so many people in congress, not just republicans, have criticized the administration, even publicly, for this really stupid policy. it seems that anthony blinken may not have performed very well during his visit to kyiv last week, but he came back with the important insight

that this policy is pointless and its must be changed. so, now the administration is in trouble. i think there's a significant chance, maybe even higher than 50%, that this flight will... change because the whole world sees how stupid it is. it's not certain, but i think there's more than a 50% chance that things will change in the next few weeks. at least 10 countries have already allowed their weapons to be used on russian territory: great britain, canada, finland, poland, sweden, the czech republic, the baltic states and the netherlands. as reported by the american publication politico, the us president joe biden yes... secretly agreed to the use of american weapons for strikes on the territory of russia, but only near the kharkiv region, it is not known what range or type of weapons are in question. ukraine has confirmed the lifting of some restrictions. why is this decision urgent for ukraine? according to the video

of the ukrainian military, it can be seen that one of the main means of counter-battery combat and the destruction of important targets in the near rear, such as rep stations, uav operators and the like. in recent months , jemeler missiles from the haimars complex have been launched. near kharkiv the armed forces cannot use them, despite the fact that there is enough for this type of ammunition. and here the question arises whether there will not be a limitation on the range of use of western weapons already after the permit takes effect. suppose the administration says: you can use any weapon that we. transferred only 100 km deep into russia. i think it is possible. i don't think it's a good idea, but they might go for it. even, let's expand a little, up to 200 km deep into russia. this might solve the problem. which concern kharkiv and the offensive in the northeast, but still, i

hope that there will be a final break with this stupid policy. it's bad for the united states, terrible in terms of deaths, civilian deaths and casualties, and damage done. infrastructure of ukraine. often it is not measured in kilometers, but in specific goals that are sufficient to risk making a decision. in particular, we sometimes do not think about the fact that, unlike russia , it is extremely important for the west that there should be no civilian casualties, for example. well, that's just it the red line is real, not what the russians draw there every time and then redraw, because support for us, support for our armed forces, support within those countries, their governments, which help. it depends on how high the moral bar is, the moral bar of ukraine is extremely high, we are fighting for our independence, for our survival, and we are doing everything possible so that not a single civilian is harmed, even when we have to hit the npc with you, when we it is necessary to hit the boarding station some node, when we need to hit the port and so on and so on

and so on, this is important, and that is why i am sure that the conversation is just not in kilometers, centimeters, kilograms, but about such general things, before that all political decisions . measures that increased the potential of the ukrainian army to repel the russian invasion were delayed for a long time. this was the case with tanks, long-range weapons, or with f-16s, which still do not participate in hostilities. as vadym prystayko says, convincing partners to help is a difficult process. in great britain, be any other country there may be other considerations, for example, when the financial year ends, when the electoral cycle ends, when a new electoral cycle begins, and then our task with you as the government of ukraine, as diplomats, is to explain that look, you have so much, let's say you need to start production, you haven't started yet, or just starting, so based on what you can convey, we understand that you are worried about what you will defend yourself with. that russia, and that's right, it's your responsibility as your state, and that's ours there are so many units left, i don't know,

capacity and so on, we can stretch them for a long time, until you have our closest partners have an electoral cycle and maybe another government will come, we have to be aware of that, or you can squeeze it all and give us now and then we will strike hard and we can improve our situation and your situation and give you an opportunity to give us more, that is, for the complex, you know, connected rhetoric that is... we have here, the cities are suffering people suffer, which is strung on the actions of other partners, this entire complex mechanism, a complex picture, and ultimately leads to decisions that are not needed. i wouldn't be surprised if people in the white house are trying to figure out how this will affect the presidential election, but the timidity that characterizes the policies of this administration in trying to stop russian aggression in ukraine, that timidity was evident before the big one. how many times has the administration said no to sending a certain weapon and then reversed its position. so it fits that one

a scheme that two years ago had nothing to do with our upcoming presidential election. today it is possible, but again , this pattern existed long before that. the ban on the ukrainian military to fire at targets on the territory of russia helps the invading forces and leaves a new round of aggression. expansion of the front line with impunity. the limited capabilities of the armed forces, together with the indecision of the western partners, may lead to an even greater stretching of the front line in the north of ukraine. and every day of delay with the decision increases the price that ukraine will have to pay, being on the defensive. it was donbas realii, my name is roman pagulych. see you turn on well - it's when everything is as you

want. click and now you control the game. the bird and you are in a tv show. oh, what is needed. migo turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports. there are times when the body quickly loses fluid, which can lead to dehydration. when ordinary water is not enough ireo. rheo - water for special medical purposes. allergy started lev overcomes deer. cetrilev neo protects against the most common allergens. is discounts, represent unbreakable discounts on exodoril solution, 15% in psyllium pharmacies, you and savings. exclusively on the air of our channel. greetings friends. politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week.

russia's war against ukraine. the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland. topics that resonate in our society. drone attack on kyiv. and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other cities of russia. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country has to get the right start negotiations on accession to the eu. vitaly portnikov and guests of the project: we are bored, because there is nothing to fight about, let's invent, they help to understand the present and predict the future. for the world, a second trump presidency will be terrible. a project for those who care and think. political club. every sunday at 20:10 at espresso. vasyl zima's big broadcast: two hours of airtime, two hours of your time, two hours to

learn about the war and what the world is like, two hours to keep up with economic and sports news, two hours in the company of your loved ones presenters, presenters who have become like family to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people in the evening. espresso. verdict with serhiy rudenko. from now on in a new two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests: foreign experts, inclusion of law. about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion at any time of the day with the help of a telephone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhii rudenko, every weekday from 20 to 22 at espresso.

greetings, friends, this week, for sure, one of the... brighter news in the world of culture was certainly the news that we will soon have a film adaptation of the tereodors from vasyukivka to sevalo denistaika, but it is not yet certain, knowing how much right now , our cinematic process is faltering a little, but at least the filmmakers have bought the rights to the film adaptation, we will talk to them today, ask them how they see the film adaptation, because there are many different irritating we... points, first of all, the book by vsevel danestayka, as an unconditional bestseller, is loved, i will not mince words, by millions of people, children and adults, but there is still a question as to whether the authors will satisfy people's tastes or expectations, because expectations will definitely be , because the news, actually, about the idea of ​​ukrainization has already spread, and there are also various

moments that are also contradictory with the soviet union, because you remember, there are many episodes, but there are ideological moments that are disputed in literary circles, to delete them or not to delete, some say that it is not possible with there is nothing to delete the books, you just need to write signatures, disclaimers, explain that this was such an era and such were the realities, accordingly, in schools, you should also talk to children accordingly, we will talk about all this with the authors in literally 15 minutes, but for now i will tell you about ... what we even have in our cinema to show to children, because there is a popular opinion that we have very little content for children, even speaking broadly, not only about cinema, but also about television content that trouble is trouble mountains, mountains, that our children and teenagers, teenagers have nothing to watch, and i want

to say that if we talk about television series, we really do not have such ... examples, although some are quite decent, for example, like the first swallows, two seasons, the series is absolutely, i think it's luxurious, but let's remember that we have from such the most vivid or the most discussed, regardless of quality, well , for sure, in the first place, in any case, we have a monkey, so that this tape is the highest-grossing of all ukrainian films and the highest-grossing of all films released. ukrainian rental, if i’m not mistaken, if we’re talking about money, and it’s an incredible success, i personally didn’t expect such a thing, the cartoon was expected for a long time, there was a lot of advertising campaign, you could see all these different ones in supermarkets, i don’t know, whether -what kind of goods with a mauve, and the outline of a bunch can also be purchased, but here, or see

a cartoon somewhere, most people liked it, although there was criticism about, probably, the most... everything looks, not our way, and i was so hammered, he said, somehow it's disney-esque i understood that the disney style is considered bad by these people, i personally liked the cartoon, so i am happy about its success not only in ukraine, but also abroad, well , we also have a cartoon, one of the most popular, called the stolen princess, it is the same producers, as well as mother, the film ua, animagrad and from stolen. the princess was like that, well, first of all, it's also a popular cartoon, i think it's quite well made, there the stars voiced the main characters, and it's also such a hollywood scheme, when stars are involved, for example, show business, and they always voice something there, duplicate it, but the problem is that this cartoon is based on pushkin, now

many people are triggered by pushkin, and then, well, in 2018, somehow not so much. during the war, but there were much fewer such voices, i am sure that if this cartoon had been released now, there would have been much more of a scandal, and also the cartoon, well , by the way, if you watch it, it tells about kyiv, everything is in the trailer itself emphasizes that it is kyiv, everything takes place in kyiv, let's give an excerpt let's see this is kyiv, a wonderful city, it is ruled by the glorious prince volodymyr, and this is me, an ordinary actor, a troubadour, hello, you fell asleep there, huh, ruslan, a restless wandering troubadour . the producers

sold its rental there, and there was such a scandal in 2019 that the distributors are already russian, they demonstrated all this not only on the territory of russia, but also on the occupied territories, for example, in crimea, and our producers are ukrainian, when they were approached they said that it was unacceptable, we did not allow such a thing to be done, this cartoon was called in russia, and ruslan and lyudmila reboot, there are also such questions in general about these popular cartoons, such, well, hollywood type, when they began to be drawn somewhere, i think, since 2015, well, they started to be released a little bit there in the 16th and 17th, somewhere like that, and they... were often released in russia as well, they were released in many other countries, but we is definitely interested in russia, this, you know, then before

a full-scale invasion there were questions, i will repeat myself once again, regarding this practice, but many people believed that it was a completely normal story, to sell something to the russians, this trade went anywhere, and holivar returns, there was such a cartoon that was released ... in 1021, he, these are the producers the 95th quarter was, there was a lot of talk about this cartoon, many people also discussed it there, some liked it, some did not like it, but the question is that ilya maksimov filmed it, he is a russian director, and the rental was also in russia, i remember i think, at the premiere, i approached i asked one of the producers, are you going to sell this cartoon in the territory of russia, he said that they will sell it all to the library or sell it to mod distributors who will already be engaged in the distribution of this cartoon to different territories, and maybe they will also sell this

cartoon to russia, but we, they say, have nothing to do with it, i will say that this was such a popular scheme from smears for our producers, to say that we just sell it to some libraries, we just sell it to distributors , well, these are already them they will give... the go-ahead to which country to sell to , to which not watching when very, very similar series are released in russia and ukraine, they are almost the same, and clara and the magic dragon, i will say that this is just a cartoon that was filmed according to the same scheme, now we can see it. there were a lot of reviews, by the way, back then, that this was such a cartoon, what a 19th year, many people liked the picture, right? here, but

they criticized the plot itself, they say, a weak plot, they would like something brighter, here, but the issue is that the tape was also released in russia, but it was absolutely like this, i repeat, a standard situation that was repeated with almost every cartoon . but not all children's children's content was not all released in russia, because, for example, such a film as hell's banner, it could not be released in russia, because there at all, you know, like all the cartoons i talked about above, and mavka, and the kidnapped princess, and that's all, they were filmed in such a neutral way to serve and sell for different markets, but the hellish banner is absolutely such a pronounced ukrainian. the story, the main character is a cossack played by hryhoriy boklanov, he is very cool, he acted, i generally liked this movie, although there are terrible graphics, absolutely, i do not know how much they spent,

probably 15 hryvnias for it conditionally, because it is of course, it's a shame to make such graphics, but i liked everything else, there's an interesting plot, there such a cossack, you know, he was, well, plain, yes, no, not such a positive hero, when you look at him and there the milk just sours. who is he with a trick, there is a devil, he is fooling the devil, let's see an excerpt, you are crazy, hands, i apologize, i am in trouble, my son is missing, i need to be saved, is that what they are asking for, in spades of flour, and why would they want you i see, because you are the smallest, you are such a gift to them, i do not know how, but i will teach you, i promise, here is a cross for you. we also have a kind of parody of home alone, this tape is called adventures of s. mykolaiv, adventures. st. nicholas

directed by semen horov, whom i think we remember well for these musicals, these evenings at the huts of the blizdikan women, who spun for the new year, these products were filmed together with the russians, even i think, with russian money, and there was much more, and this one, you know, it is unlikely that these musicals can be shown on tv now, but here he filmed this december fairy tale, or the adventure of saint nicholas, it is called a tape. masha efrasynina is, well, a continuation of the tradition of inviting not actors, not actresses, but media people to attract the audience, and they leave it there too sister and brother at home alone and bandits rush to them and the children of these bandits start mocking a thousand people there , and of course the film is much weaker than one at home, but everyone immediately saw that

this was such a parody, that's why the film put out... quite ambiguous, ambiguous views, and impressions, but still many, especially children liked it, because it is so colorful, it is bright, and i saw how children like all this, they watched it with pleasure, and there is also such we have the movie foxter and max, he shot it the other one, i think, is a director known to you, whose name is anatoly meteshko, i think you remember him. on the tv series "the birthday of a bourgeois" and here he filmed a children's such a teenage story, a children's, probably still fox max about a boy and his dog, such a nano dog. i will say that this is not a pespatron, now you will see, it is a fox terrier, because many people confuse such exteriors with jack russells, but here is this film, i also liked it enough, there it is about this animal, there it is

also about some adventures, about ... love about such you know, a boy who is not very confident in himself, but later he finds some cool sides, strengths, and becomes much more confident, and his girlfriend also finds a lot of good in him, gives him this confidence, i liked this approach , well, i also can’t help but mention the babai cartoon, i want to mention it only so that you know how it can be, what cartoons we had, well, it was terribly criticized, now you can even see, well , the image itself, how much it is cheaper, smaller professional than the cartoons we saw before, but this guy was criticized for the selection of these absolutely crazy colors, so very, very, very bright, and for the plot, which also seemed to many to be quite weak, well, that is...

with very poorly made cartoons, this is a ukraneme production, and therefore i just showed you this cartoon so that you could compare it with the previous ones and understand that we are basically moving in the right direction and our cartoons and animations are developing, although, if you talk to the directors and directors of animated films, then animated films, then they will cry to you and say that they do not pay attention to this industry. attention and they will be right, but on the other hand, i want to say that cartoons, and family films in general, are very profitable for rental, as long as they are made of high quality and get to the audience, because family films are considered profitable, because children come and come they are not alone with their parents, that is why tickets are bought much more than for any other tapes, and this is the same

popular genre all over the country. are also considered local comedies, and we can see from our box office that this is really confirmed, because some of the most popular films in our box office have become the local comedies i, you , him, her, or crazy weddings, and so on. well, now, friends, you and i are moving on to the toreodors from vasyukivka, our guests are already on the line, but i will tell you such a short background story that we have. and now we can see an illustration of the tereodors from... a future movie, a future film, one of the directors, roman krasnoshchok, posted it on his facebook, now we will ask him whether will this film be like this, like that, or will it still be different, because if we remember the monkey, the monkey that was shown to us at first, it was categorically different.