that the child is really unaccompanied, ask the people nearby if they know the child or if they saw who she was with, find out the child's name and where she is from, ask the names of her parents or other adults who were with her, maybe they left the child a note with your contacts, ask the child about it, and of course, call the police and the magnolia children's search service, our hotline number is 11630, calls to all mobile operators in ukraine are free. we have created a resource through which you can report any crime against a child. in anywhere, anytime. just go to the site and report, and we will launch all possible mechanisms to punish the criminal. stopcrime.ua.

there are discounts represent unbreakable discounts on troxivasin 15% in pharmacies plantain for you and the saver allergies are few lions overcome tsy3 lev c3 lev neo protects against the most common allergens try flebodia 600 pink french pills for acute hemorrhoids flebodia 600 heal hemorrhoids without any oops, there are discounts, represent unbreakable discounts on emolium, 25% in pharmacies, travel stores, you and savings exclusively on the air of our channel. greetings , friends, politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week.

russia's war against ukraine, the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland. topics causing resonance in our society: drone attack on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other russian cities. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country should get the right to start negotiations on joining the eu. vitaly portnikov. and guests of the project: we are bored, that's why that there is nothing to fight about, let's get out, help understand the present and predict the future, for the world the second presidency of trump will be terrible. project for those who care and think politclub. every sunday at 20:10 at espresso. vasyl zima's big broadcast. two hours of air time. hours

of your time, two hours to learn about the war and what the world is like, two hours to keep up with economic and sports news, two hours in the company of your favorite presenters, presenters who have become familiar to many, and distinguished guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, espresso in the evening. the verkhovna rada regularly passes new laws, but what about these changes? affect our lives. we have analyzed the new decrees to inform you about the latest changes in ukrainian legislation. how do legislative norms change our lives, what should we prepare for? leading lawyers of the aktum bar association will answer these and other questions that concern ukrainians. watch every tuesday at 7:55 in the program legal expertise on espresso tv channel. in principle, i... am against the russian orthodox church existing in

ukraine. yes, and a very logical, logical answer, they bless the war, it's not normal, and i think they don't belong here, that's for sure. i would simply pack up these priests and send them back to russia, and let them do what they want there, you see, they have a whole network of agents, developed, i don't understand how things are going in the country, the country in which it is going war, as such is generally permissible, i understand. here, why i think so, because the russian orthodox church has been around for a long time not about religion, that is, there is the so-called orthodoxy of the brain, and it is about the fact that people, these popes of ephesus, use religion to cover their anti-ukrainian activities. well, of course, there should be a ukrainian church, a russian church in ukraine. 65% of ukrainians believe that the russian orthodox church and

moscow patriarch kirill encourage and support aggression against russia. 47% of ukrainians believe that representatives of the uoc-mp spread russian propaganda and justify russia's actions. 34 are convinced that the priests of the uoc mp are cooperating with the occupying russian authorities. cars lined up against us under the fence of the church, supported them with military equipment, and at that moment left the church. father victor came out with some man, well, not in a typical uniform, well, i understand that these are the special services, and he told us that we were detained, that a special check would be conducted on us, it would take about a day or two, at this point, father said ,

place people, do we have a chance? solve the issue of historical scale, yes, if the parliament finally considers in the second reading the draft law on the prohibition of the procedure, it took almost two years, we in the parliament wrote out a balanced effective law, it was not easy, we had to overcome the resistance of roc lobbyists and make difficult compromises, but when it remained to make the final decision to vote in the second reading, everything stopped. on may 21, at the conciliatory council of the parliament, representatives of the servant of the people and... opzz did not support the proposal to include the law on prohibition of the russian orthodox church in the agenda. the position of the pro-moscow fifth column from the opzh is known, but it is not clear why the servants of the people ignore president zelensky, who called for a solution to the issue precisely in the legal field. unfortunately, even

russian terror and a full-scale war did not convince some activists that it is worth overcoming the temptation of evil. these and others. decisions, we guarantee ukraine's spiritual independence. i want to emphasize that in 1991 , our state started on the legal and democratic path, we will continue on this path , only legal steps, balanced decisions and national interests. the opposition had to block the podium, heated discussions. continued in speaker stefanchuk's office. as a result, the servants agreed to collect signatures, if there are enough of them, submit the draft law for consideration in the second reading. but here we have to watch our hands, i will tell later how they can bury this law, or delay the case again for months or even years.

for now, let's remember how it was done until now. the majority of factions in the parliament support the ban on the activities of the russian orthodox church. the nsdc made the appropriate decision: the most important thing is the will of the people. straight 63% of ukrainians approve of the prohibited activities of moscow priests. as early as december 1 , 2022, president zelensky instructed the cabinet to develop and submit for consideration verkhovna rada draft law on banning religious organizations that are managed from russia. it took two months. not two months have passed, almost two years have already passed. what went wrong? why the story of the liquidation of the russian network in ukraine has become so confusing: who is saving the kremlin church? i will tell. the details are still unknown, because only through publicity can we disrupt the situation with you, only our mobilization will force the authorities to finally vote for the banning of the russian orthodox church. why was it not accepted, you ask, well, what can i say, that's why

that there are lobbyists in the verkhovna rada, not only that, and we remember there that as far as i read there, the main representative of the russian orthodox church even now has... a bracelet, for example, why was it taken off, what the hell, he was bothering him there to pray or something, and so a person sits at home to himself, well , that is, there are a lot of questions, probably why there are such blinds, because incompetent people sit in their positions, you just understand, who simply peck at their citizens for their duties, the beginning war, they grasped it because they needed it for trends, we are the supreme council, we are for ukraine, we woke up, yes, we are for the ukrainian language, they will accept everything for them. what's ukrainian, vyshyvanka, borscht, everything, everything, everything, everything, but what hasn't been voted on yet? it is unprofitable for someone to adopt this law, of course, we, we understand that he went to the verkhovna rada, that he went to the presidential administration, there are rats that need to be weeded out, by the evening they will all die, in the name of the father and the son and the holy spirit, we commemorate

the patriarch and pray for him, i recently met with him, as our patriarch kirill once said, between the church and the state should be a symphony. after the full-scale invasion, ukrainians were shocked by the cooperation of roc priests with the invaders. the indignation was rapid... it became: the authorities, which before the war cooperated with the moscow patriarchate, could no longer ignore the facts of mass collaboration, espionage, adjusting the fire of pro-russian agitation. after the appointment of vasyl malyuk as head of the sbu in the fall of 2022, the special service began to investigate these episodes. like millions of ukrainians, i supported such actions of the security services, but at the same time i understood that only by the forces of the special service, this issue cannot be resolved. system solutions are needed. hopes that the church communities would independently get out of the control of patriarch kirill, who called for the destruction of ukraine, did not come true. in

the third year of the great war, only 685 churches severed ties with the russian orthodox church. this is less than 10% of their total number of more than 800. it must be admitted that the moscow church in ukraine withstood the first blow, they managed to deceive the majority of communities and convince them that the mp is now an independent church and has nothing to do with cyril. from the church charter the provision on the connection with the russian orthodox church was excluded, except for the reference to the letter of patriarch oleksii ii from the early 90s, but this was such a tactical ruse. in january of the 23rd year , the state examination established: "upcmp remains a structural subdivision of the russian orthodox church and has not severed the canonical connection with it. neither metropolitan noufry nor the synod of bishops addressed moscow with a message about breaking ties with the russian orthodox church. therefore, in pcmp will continue to be canonical." and is organizationally subordinate to the organization headed by patriarch kirill.

many priests and bishops still commemorate him. it is no coincidence that only the pcmp is allowed to serve in temporarily occupied territories, while clerics of the ocu, gcc and protestants are kidnapped and killed. while the legal casuistry continued, ukrainians switched to other problems. the roc felt that public attention to it had decreased. and went on a counterattack. it continues to this day and may even end with the victory of the moscow church. only 19 court verdicts were handed down in two years. several more priest -hierarchs were exchanged for our prisoners of war. that's all. i predicted that this would happen, therefore, as soon as the sbu began to investigate cases against the servants of the russian orthodox church, he registered bill 8221 on the ban. activities of this organization in ukraine. at that time, there were already enough facts to claim that this

structure had lost its religious features and was performing military tasks. i made two investigative films about the need to ban the activities of the russian orthodox church, where i thoroughly presented my proposals. in the end, my draft law was registered, it was supported by all pro-ukrainian factions, and also unanimously a profile committee of the parliament, where the majority consists of deputies from the servant of the people. and... but the authorities themselves did not notice him. finally, in the winter of 23, the government submitted its draft law 8371, but time passed and it became clear that no one was serious about banning the russian orthodox church. the government document was ignored, as was mine. the spring of the 23rd year came, the tension in society grew, because the russian orthodox church continued to commit crimes and provocations. on what basis did you not let our two dead boys in here to die. what, so that you understand, what i cannot deserve from them, what do you want to serve at the funeral,

a chaplain or the ocu, then don't ask me to take them to the church, its priests forbade to mourn the fallen ukrainian soldiers, i beg you, it came to fights with relatives and brothers of the hero. after that, a wave of public protests swept across ukraine, congregations

of several cathedral churches in khmelnytskyi, rivne, and lviv left the russian orthodox church. city councils took land and premises from the moscow church. the situation was heating up. actually, what i warned about happened. if not solve the problem through the law, then the street will have its say, but during the war, any disturbance in our body is in the hands of the enemy. and only in the fall of the 23rd, a year after the registration of my draft law, the government document was finally brought to the session hall. it was voted in the first reading, although my draft law was already supported. profile committee, nevertheless, i agreed to work on the government one in order to make it high-quality, because the document that came to the parliament from the cabinet of ministers did not solve any issue at all. i detail its shortcomings discussed in my previous films, but i will point out the main flaw: no one was going to directly ban the activities of the entire russian orthodox church in ukraine. they wanted to consider each community

separately, and there are almost 9,000 of them. it was necessary to go through several bureaucratic circles, and then all the courts. with the risk of losing the case at the european court of human rights. it was an unrealistic task for many years. in my draft law, i proposed another way, to ban all structures of the russian orthodox church because of their direct threat to national security. this approach is not would cause objections in europe. we already have such examples. i will talk about them later. however, the very fact that the government submitted its draft law was already our big victory. because they didn't even agree to that before. we won. an important battle, our information activity, public pressure, sbu activity forced the authorities to react, and after the vote in the first reading, it was time for analytical and lobbying work in the committee. the head of the committee, nikita poturaev, although he belongs to the presidential faction of the servant of the people, and i belong to the opposition, of european solidarity, we both combined our efforts. we were moving in

the right direction together. not everything was successful. for example, the committee did not support my proposal to enter the bill into law. but we agreed to other fundamental amendments from the draft law 8221 and the draft law on the decolonization of cultural space. in particular, the reason for banning the activities of the russian orthodox church is the national security interests of ukraine. this is in line with the european convention on human rights and the case law of the european court of human rights. to ukrainian legislation the definition of ruskagmir as a criminal ideology, which is prohibited on the territory of our state, is introduced. it is prohibited. activities of other religious organizations that are affiliated with the center of management in the country of the aggressor. this affiliation is determined by the court. the state returns to its ownership religious buildings and other real estate in the event that a religious organization refuses to sever ties with the russian orthodox church or other organizations on the territory of the aggressor's country. another military winter passed, but in the spring of the 24th, the russian one

the orthodox church continues to operate in ukraine, although for its ban there is... it is necessary, the military and political need to strengthen national security exists, it exists, there is public support, the loss of the character of a religious organization by the russian orthodox church, because it became an accomplice of armed aggression against ukraine, having given it a sacred character, of course, patriarch kirill personally, the clerics of the russian orthodox church justified aggression against ukraine. the most ardent chauvinists in their sermons blessed the murders of ukrainians. without prayer in a package a package. you don't equip hails, you push every cigar, lord, have mercy, lord, have mercy, and so on, and so on, and so on, then, uh, not because you want to, you have to, but as an institution, the russian orthodox church supported the genocidal war on march 27 of the 24th year, on this day

, the so-called world russian people's council was held in the cathedral of christ the savior in moscow, it was convened and conducted by kirill gundyaev. it was he who, even before the revolution of dignity and the start of the war with russia , presented the pseudo-theological concept of russkamir to putin. thanks to kirill this one ideology in russia became the state base for future aggression. that is why the march cathedral is called the present and future of the russian world. according to its results, the so -called order was adopted, where the war in ukraine was called the "holy war". the special military operation is a new stage of national liberation. the struggle of the russian people against the criminal kyiv regime and the collective west behind it, which has been taking place on the lands of southwestern russia since 2014 . during the svo, the russian people with weapons in their hands defend their life, freedom, statehood, civilizational, religious, national cultural identity, as well as the right to live in one's own

land, within the borders of a single russian state. from a spiritual and moral point of view. this is nothing but a call for genocide, the destruction of ukrainians as a nation, and these statements did not go unnoticed by the civilized world. already on april 17, 2024, the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe unanimously recognized the russian orthodox church as an instrument of kremlin propaganda and influence, and the head of the russian orthodox church, patriarch kirill and the hierarchs, as accomplices in crimes russia against ukraine. adopted the resolution contains strict characteristics of both the patriarch personally and the entire hierarchy. the regime of vladimir putin is committed to the neo-imperialist ideology of the russian world. which the kremlin has turned into an instrument of stopping the war, the hierarchy of the moscow patriarchate of the russian orthodox church upholds the ideology of russian peace, declaring the war

against ukraine and the satanic west a holy war for all russians. the decisions of this council clearly showed that the russian orthodox church is a fundamentalist organization that ideologically serves the terrorist actions of his state. this is a kind of pseudo-orthodox hamat. in our parliament, this order also caused indignation, some colleagues, who had hesitated before, decided to support the ban on the russian orthodox church, but suddenly a new obstacle appeared. a few days later , a strange letter arrived at the moscow cathedral addressed to the leadership of the verkhovna rada. in it, the deputies were threatened with sanctions from the us and international courts if they dared to ban the russian orthodox church. the letter was written by an american-canadian lawyer robert amsterdam. he was hired by an oligarch of russian origin and a sponsor of the russian orthodox church , vadym novinsky, to protect the interests of the moscow patriarchate. a month before, the lawyer visited kyiv, spent eight days there,

met with the head of the uocp, metropolitan onufrii berezovsky, and based on the results of this trip, he decided to block the adoption of the law banning the russian orthodox church with threats. if this law is voted on by the council, our team will work to ensure that sanctions and other legal consequences are in place. imposed on those who allowed the attack on freedom of religion in ukraine. of course, this is not true, there is no question of persecution on religious grounds, because the russian orthodox church is not a church, but the same tool of the kremlin in the war as the fsb, the army or propaganda. this was clearly stated by the council of europe. for their part, the parliamentarians accused robert amsterdam of interfering in ukraine's internal affairs and asked the sbu to contact the fbi to analyze his actions there. after that, the lawyer wrote. another letter, in which he excused himself that in fact he did not threaten, but only warned it was just a change of tactics, so as not to get into trouble, he decided

not to persecute the entire parliament, but specific deputies, on whom the adoption of the law most depends. this draft law not only exposes people's deputies, such as stefanchuk, knyazhytskyi, poturaev, kravchuk and the like, to the threat of american sanctions for violating the basic. through bill 8371, zelenskyi will go down in history as a person who illegally imprisoned priests and destroyed the ukrainian church. zelensky suddenly became a hostage ultranationalists. but while we were solving one problem, others appeared. at some point, it became clear that this was no accident. but let's go in order. around the same time as the letter of the russian orthodox church lobbyist robert amsterdam to the chairman of the verkhovna rada, ruslan steph. another letter arrived, this time from ukrainian experts on religion, with as many as seven points undermining the approved draft law. i will dwell on some of

the most odious. in particular, religious scholars are outraged that the law will ban only the russian orthodox church, but other russian churches will work and further. this is manipulation. the law offers a framework that can be expanded. experts, for example, can collect evidence about the crimes of other russian churches and on this basis demand their ban. currently, the sbu has such evidence only in relation to the russian orthodox church. the seventh point states: the authors of the editorial stubbornly drag the concept of national security into the draft law, although they cannot fail to know that the ninth article of the european convention on human rights does not operate with this concept. it is noteworthy that the mention of national security does not add anything to the draft law, does not make it any less more effective, more efficient, more legally perfect, but is subject to sharp criticism from the human rights community. and this is also a lie, which in a strange way... coincides with russian narratives. the draft law does not concern the right to practice religion, which is provided for in article nine of the convention. it applies only to activities of a religious

organization that are directed against national security. and this is under the control of article 11 of the convention. numerous decisions of the european court of human rights contain conclusions about these differences. therefore, the mention of national security is the fundamental motive for adopting the law. but this is a purposeful denial of the norm on the protection of national security. only proved the correctness of our plan. it is precisely on this basis that the activities of the russian orthodox church should be banned. this is an iron argument, because no state will allow religion to be used against public and national security. and ukraine is no exception. but the closer we got to introducing the bill for the second reading, the stronger the resistance became. the number of unexpected opponents grew. and that's the main thing the legal department of the verkhovna rada tried to undermine its adoption. they wrote as many as three. pages of remarks, but the main claim, like that of religious scholars to the norm on national security, is that they, in particular, write: at the same time, neither the constitution of ukraine nor the european convention

on human rights, which is referred to... the draft law, nor the international covenant on civil and political rights, which also protects these freedoms, which, however , is not mentioned in the text of the project, do not provide for the possibility of limiting the rights to freedom of conscience, religion and association in religious organizations in the interests of national security, and as a conclusion, limiting the freedom of worldview and religion for the protection of national security is possible only during the period of martial law, and again for money, no one limits the freedom of worldview and religion. the activity of specific structures that the aggressor state uses in the war with ukraine is prohibited. if the communities that are currently in unity with the russian orthodox church withdraw from their membership, the law will not apply to them either. but it seems so intentional substitution of concepts is not accidental. no one is even going to analyze the experience of other countries, members of the eu, which have passed much harsher laws against the russian orthodox church. in september 22 , the diet of latvia adopted

the draft law submitted by the country's president, eiels levits. on the withdrawal of the latvian orthodox church from the power of the moscow patriarchate. already in october, the cathedral of this church announced its withdrawal from the russian orthodox church. the updated law did not concern canonical issues, by the way, like ours, but unlike ukraine, in latvia it is provided state control over the appointment of hierarchs. this was done so that moscow could not annex the church from the inside, as was done in ukraine in 1992. therefore, in latvia , safeguards were installed after the election of the head of the church. metropolitans or bishops, the decision on this should be published by the official printed body of the office of the president of the republic of latvia. it would seem that this is just a formality, but it is not. if there is no such message, the appointment is not valid. and this is already the task of the special services to identify those disloyal to persons of the latvian state and submit information about them to the office of the president of the republic. renunciation of any connection with the patriarch of moscow is an important issue

for all our orthodox. of latvian society and national security, definitely not, because i still remember from school that the state and religion should be separate, well, it's all politics in any case, it's money and politics, so of course, how are they money and such amounts and churches , well, in general, the land is disposed of, of course, it must be approved not only by the church, and at least by the state, my personal opinion is that they should be approved directly by the sbu, you understand, through... a truth detector through several checks, you understand, in the same way, let's say, as i was admitted to the army, it is written in the laws that the church separately, we somehow have no involvement there, but if it affects the social order and the constitutional sovereignty of the state, then the question here is no longer whether it is a democracy or not, here it is a question of what correct decisions should be made, so i am inclined to that it should be so, therefore the latvians had the same motivation as

us, the protection of national security. and no one criticized their members of the european union for this. perhaps yez knows human rights worse than some ukrainian religious experts and lawyers. and now, following latvia, estonia is also going to ban the activities of the structures of the russian orthodox church. note that none of these countries have been attacked by moscow, but they are acting preemptively. and the ukrainian authorities have been marinating the law banning the moscow church for more than a year, which it wrote itself, is it like sabotage? the key the same scandalous council on march 27, where the war in ukraine was called sacred, was the reason that prompted the estonian authorities to closely engage... the russian church. to begin with , the estonian government summoned representatives of the russian orthodox church to explain such statements. and on april 11, the minister of internal affairs of estonia, lauri lenemets , said that the russian orthodox church is no different from islamic terrorists and is directly subordinate to putin, so he will propose to the parliament to declare the russian orthodox church a terrorist organization. the city hall selected talin from the russian orthodox church.

the house in the center of the capital, where it was located.