but i became more cheerful, thank you very much for such an incredible trip, it will never be forgotten in my heart, let's give memories together that will warm our hearts and help us survive these difficult and scary moments. we return. to the live broadcast, a new week, new thoughts, a new vision of what is happening in ukraine and the world, and now we have an hour of our thoughts, our analytics, and communication with you, which is important and communication, yes, we will answer those questions , which you, you, at least we were asked in social networks on the youtube channel of the espresso tv channel, and we remind you, of course. to you about

our survey, it goes like this: will a global peace summit lead to real peace, you can pick up your phones, call these numbers that are on your screens, if you think that a global peace summit will lead to real peace, then dial 0.800 211 381 if you think not then dial 0.800 211 380. all your calls are free and i think we should also talk about the global peace summit about the consequences, about what, in the end, he will bring to ukrainian politics, to world politics, whether peace will come, whether peace will not come, whether it is a sum, we need to come down a little from heaven to earth, or it is purely conditional. a political

event that is simply unifying and political, but khrystyna has her own thoughts, i suggest scanning how ukrainians reacted to the final photo of a large number of countries that are represented at such a high level, the point is that how does it happen always, opinions are very divided, and each side has its own arguments, about what it's about, let's remember, this is a memorable video about how they made the final at the global peace summit, photo. glory to ukraine, glory, well, a large number of people, very tall, tall people, people who approve. the decision

of the fate of the world, this is absolutely no exaggeration, and here i would like to quote oksana zabushka, a writer, she writes: i love transitions from the profane to the symbolic, don't say that, but it's still majestic, when about 100 countries against the background of the harsh alps pronounce the ukrainian, glory to the heroes, well, it's true, it really looks triumphant, but nevertheless under it... ms. oksana, ukrainians began to express their opinions, many reasonably, to be honest, in some sense i can absolutely agree with this, they note that they do not understand why this the head of the president's office, andriy yermak, is necessarily present near the photo of the ukrainian president, they say, it shouldn't be like that, someone thinks that it doesn't matter who is from ukraine in the photo.

it is extremely important and we need to rise above the situation and to see how much reality has changed in general in the historical perspective, here it would be appropriate to quote olga reshetylo from the media initiative for human rights, the absolute importance of who stands there or would stand in the center, for this moment generations of ukrainians paid and continue to pay with blood, this recognition of the nation's centuries-old struggle, for me personally... it takes my breath away from the fact that it fell to our generation to be participants in this long-suffering and long-awaited process. this is the story, andrew, can we still marvel at the presence andriy yaermak on similar in similar episodes, should we be surprised, is it possible to recognize reality and tell ourselves honestly, yes , a person whom no one chose, a person with whom no one delegated decision-making. or

some diplomatic functions, after all , he performs all this work, well, there is probably no reason to be surprised, because, because... yermak actually took part in a huge number of events, that is, we see that he is also present in the united states of america, as well as at the j7 meetings, and at others, including bilateral meetings, at the signing, in particular, well, the same security agreements, yes, so, well, i don't know why we should be surprised here , relatively speaking, but the other side of the coin, it is that, well... we are really asking ourselves there, and a person with what status, that is, what status, why such a representation, and why not the prime minister of ukraine, for example, yes, why yes, why, why is it possible that he is not the speaker of the parliament, yes, that is, there are actually many questions, but this the choice

of the president, that is, we have to understand that this is the choice of the president, that specifically andriy yermak is present at such events, and here... as they say, with this choice, well, no, you can't argue, because that's his choice and that's his decision, but don't the reactions that are there, in particular in the ukrainian segment of the network, prove about the fact that a certain, certain part of ukrainians, and we are not talking about the majority or the minority now, but this specific and prominent part of it hears, does not understand and increasingly asks questions, why, why exactly, and i repeat once again... a person to whom the ukrainian people did not delegate any power, at such a level, is not just present, but will actually introduce it certain negotiations on behalf of the state of ukraine, i understand why such questions are asked, because people, especially the conscious part of our society, the part and time

of society that reads the laws, that can open google, go in, analyze the current legislation, analyze the current constitution. that's why they naturally ask themselves the question, how does it happen, why is it so, why, why does it happen, that in fact, well , representation, it is disproportionate to the current legislation that we have in the country, yes, that is, that's why people ask questions, maybe not because it is yermamak, let's say any other surname, you can substitute it here, but people really don't understand, it's the same with us. other issues, people similarly do not understand why we now have a reduced status of the parliament, why our parliament does not quite make those decisions, at least in some discussions, in the formation of the agenda that should be in the country, why

very often our parliament does not solves the issues that it was supposed to solve, i.e., as of today, the ukrainian parliament in the parliamentary-presidential... public he does not have the status that it should have according to the constitution and the initial legislation, this is also the same problem, similar to the question regarding, in principle, this vertical of power, in our country for two years practically no government officials came to the parliament, they did not report to the parliament , there were no hours of questions to the government, i apologize, the situation turns out to be such that very often the verkhovna rada summons some official in order for him to... report, because the verkhovna rada of ukraine elected this official, this minister or this the head of another department, but in response, the person simply does not come, that is, this is the downgrading of the parliament, and this is a crisis of state

institutions. and is this acceptable in a situation where we will soon be talking about our steps to join the european union. so, literally at the end of june, it will be about how our closest western european partners see us next to them, in what role, in what format, what we can give to the european union, and what it should give us, because this, this should be a movement along the way, like us we understand, two ways, yes two ways necessarily, and in this situation. we understand that after the elections to the european parliament, when the main trends became clear, even after the exit polls, everything is going to the point that in france, in the end, emmanuel macron decides to dissolve the parliament, because it does not exactly correspond to what the electorate demonstrated

on elections to the european parliament, that is , high-ranking officials, in particular... the president and, in general, heads of state, are so sensitive to the opinion of their citizens that ready to make important decisions, and again, as we often say in ukraine. to subject our state to this electoral drudgery, pre-election processes and so on, for us it is always crazy stress, but we remind you that this is precisely why democracy is carried out, well, if we are talking now, then of course we cannot hold elections, i.e. we understand that we cannot compare the situation in france and france and the situation in ukraine, unfortunately, now with all the fact that many people, maybe there or some people would say, it is necessary... conduct elections, but there are many technical and legal nuances here that we cannot

do it, as of now, although there is also a certain discussion in society, but less with what, as they say, we have, what we have, but here, for example , when you talk about the movement of two institutions, the state of ukraine, as a large institution to the european union, and vice versa, this is a movement that goes towards each other, and here we... must understand that ukraine, despite the fact that we are now we are in a state of war, that we are now slightly different from the conditions we were in before february 24 22nd year, all the same, ukraine must take those steps to harmonize its legislation, so that ukrainian politicians, the ukrainian system in general, ukrainian elites meet the requirements and spirit of... the european union, the spirit of european integration, when scandals are happening in our country regarding

mass media information, when we have, i apologize, entire tv channels are switched off from the digital network, when we have a scandal with a public broadcaster that happened recently, then this is not exactly the movement, and by the way, this is what is included in the demands , if you look at those requirements and... and that one the report that was presented in november of last year, it clearly indicated about freedom of speech, and similarly, we saw the report of the state department of the united states of america, which also indicated this, so we want to, we don't want to, but we must understand that the issue of freedom of speech, the issue of freedom of expression of opinion, it should take place, but, i'm sorry, let's not do it... now, uh, compare or equate the freedom of speech that concerns

the russian world, this is where, as they say, there should be a sign x , here here here, you understand, here no, there should be another sub for this, you know, andrew, even before the large-scale invasion, i have received such comments several times, very skeptical, from people who consume the television product, i will ... say so about what about what freedom of speech and what kind of comprehensive coverage of opinions you can talk about on espresso, you do not have regionals, well, that is, they are part of the ukrainian parliament, they were elected by someone from ukrainians, and this is a large part of our people, and why do you don't give them word, and here i would like to note that i have always answered, you know, the truth is not somewhere in the middle, the truth is there... this is the truth, and if, if the word is given simply according to the principle

of covering all absolutely participants in the process, then it is not always about information hygiene, not always about national consciousness, and not always, as we can see, and i was right in this, about the interests and national security of our country, to this gently, what is actually meant, medvedchuk will be remembered like this. well, you can, you can mention medvedchuk, by the way, to mention in the context of many things, because on the one hand, putin is giving ukraine ultimatums, and in particular, putin is declaring that he is ready for peace talks. medvedchuk, in particular, said in an interview with a russian news agency that odesa and other cities must be occupied if ukraine does not agree to the same... capitulation that putin is now offering, and now we see this very quote on the screen :

russia's security interests dictate the need for further hostilities to combat the neo-nazi regime in order to achieve full demilitarization and denazification, while it is clear that the interests of the zelenskyi regime and the interests of the ukrainian people are directly opposite. ukrainians want peace, and zelensky wants war with the western puppeteers, even. with the price of extermination of the ukrainian people, and this people must be freed from this criminal nazi government. i emphasize once again that this was said by putin's best man, medvedchuk, a human being. which has actually been engaged in destroying our country for many years, and this statement, it correlates with another statement, putin's statement, which he did on friday, and on friday, putin said, let's also see, he said

that he is ready for peace talks, but for that , ukraine must withdraw its troops from all regions occupied by... russia, well, which ones so to speak, included in the constitution, the so-called constitution, because why so-called, because after, because after russia actually included the territories of another state in this constitution, i'm sorry, it's not a constitution, well, when when a spoon with a brown substance falls into a plate with honey, then the seat is broken, how can i explain it on my fingers, and i wanted to for... well, i will quote putin, these conditions are very simple: ukrainian troops must be fully deployed within the framework of the peace summit, within the framework of all other ukrainian successes, within the framework of those the very successes at j7 and so on and so on, so we must understand that this, this is what this racism is,

this is what the russian peace is, well, if putin is like the head of the russian... state, the head of the state, because frankly , his election there, which he held for himself, it was very funny, uh, like the head of the russian state says that ukraine should withdraw its troops only from those territories that he has included in his type of constitution, but medvedchuk just goes a little further, he thinks it is already inappropriate to accept donetsk, luhansk, zaporizhia and kherson regions into russia , he... believes that it is necessary to aim at odesa, because ukraine is not capitulating, well, that is, how it is generally correlated with each other, i do not fully understand in the mind of this person, but if you do not agree to the conditions that you just nominated by the russian president, get ready, we we will do everything to conquer even more of your territories. well, odesa, as we

understand it, and the odesa region in general, in a certain way has its own specifics, as well as... ukrainian regions, and of course, you know, as journalists, we would like to talk about good news, but our work is like this , to inform you about something not very pleasant, and now i will unfortunately do the same again. language scandal in odesa, another one, local blogger yulia karavajak was asked to leave the so-called networking evening, an event, as i understand it, where bloggers gathered there, maybe some local opinion leaders, i don't know, she demanded the speaker speak. in ukrainian, i can't let you listen to how exactly this dialogue with a speaker who speaks russian takes place on our television right now , but ms. yulia asks to speak in ukrainian, to which she is told, i'm not very comfortable, so what are you starting, ms. yulia asks if she should expect an interpreter, and she

is forced to leave the event, once again the girls. a ukrainian citizen who asked to speak publicly in the ukrainian language on the territory of the ukrainian state in odesa, that directly proportionally it is written in the ukrainian legislation, she was taken out of this event, where the leader of opinions, so to speak, or who he spoke in russian, we were not able to find out, i also searched on the internet to understand in general who it was , what is it, well at least. the organizer , a well-known odesa activist, maryan hanul, came to him , thank you very much, he talked to this man who organized this event, the man apologized, i don't know if we can show it or not, man apologized

said that this will not happen again and so on and so on, let's listen, let's listen. i want to apologize for the fact that we did not finish it, i want to say that it is i, as the organizer, who should be responsible for such issues, i am fully responsible, i apologize to all the people who were affected by this, and to yulia, who, with whom we, let's say, what kind of misunderstanding did we have, i want to say that we are adequate ukrainians, we are for ukraine, we help the armed forces, but this does not justify us, because now it is necessary to help everyone in the armed forces, but i understand that in order to in order to achieve any large scale in ukraine, it is necessary to completely... go to the ukrainian language and conduct events in the ukrainian language. well, here is such a video, another apology,

why another one, because there were already many of them. yes, and now it is very important to articulate, it is not about emphasizing the specific region in which it happened. the same thing happens regularly in many ukrainian regions, cities, and so on, and it still remains for me. an open question, why in the third year of the war language scandals still have any place at all, in particular, in the discussions, in the ukrainian segment of the network, i do not know what the fate is and whether it is possible to consider the reputations of those who spoke and those who made such a decision in relation to ms. yulia karabaghak, that is, to expel her from this event, to be nullified, but i it seems that kenselites need not... er , only russians, but also make their own comments. by the way, about the level of this cancellation, i don’t know, andrei, how you look at it, but how not

to cross this fine line, that is, there is an apology, there is an understanding that something may have happened, with on the other hand, there is also a regular approach to the same circle, if not the same people, then the same bodies. well, first of all, uh... i would like us to move away from such a concept as a language scandal or some kind of language problem. what happened here is far from a language problem, it would be a language problem if it happened there in germany or in the united states of america or in poland, it happened in ukraine, where the legislation on the ukrainian language is clearly in force. the law of ukraine on ensuring the functioning of the ukrainian language as the state language. article 29ta. of this law clearly states that all public events must be held in the state language. no one should ask anyone to switch

to the state language, no one should ask anyone for an interpreter. the event that takes place wherever it is, in lviv, in odesa, in kharkiv or in any other city of ukraine, must take place. in the state language, this is an axiom, this is the law, and to talk about the fact that someone should ask someone for something, no, no one should ask anyone, we have one country in kyiv, in odessa, in dnipro, and in ternopil, and one a law that applies everywhere, unfortunately, it’s simple, well, banal, it doesn’t reach many people, uh, they even, i’m even talking now about the moral aspect, about some aspect of what we give... what about the medvedchuks, the putins or to another, i'm sorry, this russian scumbag, we give, we, we are essentially violating the law, this is

a violation of the law. moreover, i want to say that what happened is, in essence , an encroachment on the constitutional order, on the norms of the law, so it should not just be the state language commissioner who has already reacted to it, and to taras kremen for it separate thank you, the security service of ukraine should work here, because if a person is taken out of the hall, from the hall for asking to comply with the law, if these people say, yes, listen, we will continue, go away, we will continue in russian, then this is already an undermining of the constitutional system, when people directly say, yes, we spat on this law, yes, we spat on all this, and now another... question, moral and political, by the way, the entire russian press has already reacted to this scandal, all russian television, they

applaud, they are delighted with these persons, to thing, out of all the speakers, only one spoke there in ukrainian, everyone else spoke in russian, and now this statement by medvedchuk, which we have already talked about, is coming out, and it will come out and medvedchuk will come out, because we, as a society, as a state, we give them the opportunity to do it, to, to, to, to, to a part of society, unfortunately, it still does not understand that this is important, at least in the public space, no one approaches anyone, you said, where is the line? no one goes to anyone in private. spacious, no one tells you how to speak at home, even at home swahili, whether, well, whether in hi, in any language in the world, that's your right, but there is a public

sphere, television. radio, performances, education, culture, cinema, everything that is now in the current legislation, it must be the state language, and bloggers and public figures have a very big responsibility to really switch to the ukrainian language and promote ukrainian culture, i this is exactly what i wanted to point out, that odessa is not only about such incidents, it is also about, for example, sternenko or others, and... and they are quite popular now photographers who are engaged in a very important business, they document both the crimes of the russian federation and, in general, the course of the russian-ukrainian war and the heroism of ukrainian defenders. konstantin and vlada, they are from odesa, in connection with this video that we just showed, and with this case that we just showed, they wrote on instagram today when they ask us why

we moved? from odesa to kyiv, we will show this video. there are many incredible people in odessa, many real patriots from odessa at the front, but also as you see in the video, unfortunately, they are also present, and it's just a shame. i really hope that this is regional leadership, yes, the blogosphere is regional in some sense, it will also be reformatted and will, well... let's say, reflect the main trends that exist in our country, because in my opinion, the trend into the ukrainian language, finally healthy, natural, i don’t know how, my right hand is now a trend, all this is now, why is it so actively resisted, i don’t understand, some, for example, say that there is a rollback for a certain group of citizens , here i was today giving comments, i am also asked, some say that there is a backlash

for some of our citizens, who... conditionally speaking, that is, some, conditionally speaking, are returning to the russian language again, the issue here is very complex, in fact , extraordinary russian propaganda is at work, who will come there in tiktok, in facebook, in instagram, well, to a greater extent in tiktok, apparently, there is just an insane amount of russian propaganda against the ukrainian language, when all of them were there. situations with, including there with farion, including there were several other situations, remember, with a kyiv taxi driver, russia simply cut this russian propaganda at a frantic pace, and unfortunately, many of our citizens cling to this propaganda, moreover, we also have to be frank that ukraine as a state

is not doing enough to... fight russian propaganda , including in ukraine, is not enough, for example, with laws that need to be strengthened, again, we are talking about the work of the parliament, which we cannot re-elect, but this one was also brought to nothing, the same digital platforms, that is we have russian music on digital platforms it's just swarming, we can legislate it , we can, by the way, many such things regarding the removal of content are accepted by the european... commission, in the european union, if there is some content that is unacceptable, the european commission accordingly turns to this or that platform, and this the content does not work on the territory of this or that state or the european union, we can do it, we can do it, russian music, russian films, russian culture, it has from ukrainian digital platforms, from ukrainian, from ukrainian public