is not doing enough now to fight russian propaganda, including in ukraine, not enough, for example, with laws that need to be strengthened, again, this is about the work of the parliament, which we cannot re-elect, but also this they were reduced to digital platforms, here we are on digital platforms, russian music is simply teeming with it, we can regulate it by law, we can, by the way, many such things regarding types of... content are accepted by the european commission, in the european union, if there is any content , which is unacceptable, accordingly, the european commission applies to this or that platform, this content does not work on the territory of this or that state or the european union, we can do it, we can do it, russian music, russian films, russian culture, it has from ukrainian digital platforms,

to disappear from the ukrainian, from the ukrainian public... space, and the state must work here, we, it cannot be that you, i, or someone, or a large number of our wonderful citizens who contribute to the struggle every day with this racism contribute on a completely voluntary basis, because they understand that today it is, and tomorrow we will turn again to what happened before, and when we talk about... these istanbul agreements, yes, which putin promoted, which the occupiers promoted, there was not only the issue of the army, not only the issue of nato, there was not only the issue of the movement of ukraine or the foreign policy vector, there was a huge number of people who read these treaties, devoted to ideological issues, decommunization, decolonization, language. culture,

were even prohibited, according to this treaty, to name streets after ukrainian heroes. russia perfectly understands, perfectly understands that culture, language, information policy, historical and cultural policy, this is no less important than any other policy, no less important, and they with this soft... this they strangled ukraine with a hybrid war, starting from the time of the restoration of independence in 1991, they strangled ukrainian television, strangled ukrainian music, they strangled ukrainian cinema, literally strangled everything ukrainian, and in 22, without getting all of ukraine, without occupying it, they wanted to promote the destruction of the law on language, to destroy... decommunization,

decolonization, to destroy everything related to ukrainian identity, they know very well that this is preparation of the ground for the future further occupation, they were preparing this ground until the 14th year , they prepared this soil later, they invested billions and billions of bloody dollars, bloody rubles in this cultural and informational propaganda, and believe me, they will continue to do it. how effective it will be for them, they, nothing surprising because russia continues to do what it has been doing for centuries with all its circulars and bans on our language and so on and so forth. it's strange to me that you know, there are rakes, orchards, and there are our favorites, on which we dance, and this is about ukrainians who are ready to make a retreat, which you just mentioned, i remember the first reactions during a large-scale invasion it

was impossible to hear the russian language until... until the blackness, this is such a crazy trigger that was present in the minds of many ukrainians, and it seemed to me, oh, finally some reflections people woke up, eh, i was very happy, because the reaction is so intolerant to the language and culture of the aggressor country, but how does it happen that the more blood russia drains from us, the more our people... die and the more missiles are attacked our head, little by little, this rollback is still happening, it is probably some kind of psychological effect, and it must definitely be investigated, maybe such studies already exist, but nevertheless, the situation still seems inexplicably complicated to me personally, so what could be simpler, here is the one who attacked you, and you do not want to know or hear about everything connected with aggression. and no,

unfortunately for us, well, someone says that it is different, that culture is outside of politics, that it is not putin, you can get paid for this thesis, many people for some reason believe that putin is to blame, or his entourage is to blame, is the kremlin to blame, but not russia or some individual representatives of russian society, and i always ask the question, who was to blame 500 years ago, 400 years ago, 300 years ago, who? syndrome i have balls too, so the problem is that it's not... it's far from putin, it's far from medvedchuk, medvedev or any other representative, well, putin, well, well, substitute any other name. the question is that this is a permanent russian policy, an imperial one, which is many

hundreds of years long, it will never change as long as this state entity exists. but it will exist, what will we do with it. hope that it will collapse in its place, there and be swallowed up by the ocean, we cannot, what, we should already think about what to do after the end of the war. i say why this is important because after the war is over we can go full circle. russia will be, russia, if it remains in the form in which it is now, and it most likely, let 's be honest, most likely will remain, even if there are some certain movements, maybe at first some. .. minimal liberalization once there, as under yeltsin, yes, but in the end russia will slide into the same thing, it simply cannot exist without it, we must already think about what we should do next, how we should build this border, what laws should we adopt, how should we work with society, how should we work with

youth, how should we work with and with state institutions, what should we do so that we do not slide back into this russian mirgu. this racism. and what should we do in order not to become like them, obviously, some of those who are watching us may now notice. the fact is that we mentioned that ukraine is doing everything possible to join the european union as soon as possible. nevertheless, our viewers ask questions: roman chervinskyi, roman dudin, andrii malakhov, tuman, andrii yangolenko, slobozhanshchyna, serhii pashinskyi, oleksandr vodolazkii. does the west know that there are so many politicians in ukraine? heard that is what the person who left the comment calls these people. will they help us despite the fact that a dictatorship is actually being built in ukraine. and this is also the subjective opinion of a particular contributor. i, i would not talk now about the fact that we are building a dictatorship,

but it is definitely necessary to cross the line in a situation where, on the one hand, you are defending yourself against extremely powerful neighbor. on the other hand, you need to work on the fact that... to move precisely in the direction of western civilization, because you chose and wrote it into your basic law, this is very important. on the third hand, somehow it is also necessary to keep in balance the internal political and economic situation, now the energy situation, or all this is insanely interconnected. in a word, the ukrainian state now needs to sit on absolutely all chairs, not to fall from any of them and make as few mistakes as possible. and in this aspect mentioned. questions which regarding restrictions on freedom of speech, restrictions on the work of some media on specific sites, actually arrests, which are not always clearly articulated and argued from a purely legal point of view, all these questions

continue and will continue to be asked of us, and i really thank the viewer who or who left this comment, and andrei, can we really talk about some kind of dictatorship, in your opinion, does the west know that we have certain problems that can be compared to these symptoms, to before the beginning, here is our hour this time, i spoke about the fact that, first of all, our institutions should work, the verkhovna rada should work adequately, well, the government, and there should be full accountability, it cannot be, i say once again, that someone... somewhere does not work, or someone somewhere does not obey someone there, we must understand that we are a parliamentary-presidential republic, and by the way, all these issues, they would be resolved if, for example, a government of national unity was created in ukraine, that is, if such a government was created, we would then understand that the parliament,

that the government, that all political forces are involved in this process, and then there were counterweights, but ukraine, it always... why didn't it slip into a dictatorship? and we had such periods after, after the restoration of independence, and i say once again, since 1991, when we could slip into a dictatorship, we had such and such moments. there was not one and not two, but ukraine was always saved by the fact that we had this balance, even a balance, relatively speaking, an absolute opposition, opposing sides with different views, and this balance always made it possible to keep in ukraine one or another, but democracy, when there is no balance or will not be, this is purely hypothetical, we must understand that i will. certain aspects that will actually relate to such and such semi-semi-authoritarian

things, well, yes, the compliment andriy made in some sense to the ukrainian state was to restrain the counterweight, we know that it is more and more about the united states of america, we are trying, we are stretching, but , but not only this attraction, but also kicks, which very often any power. in ukraine, and can provide maidan, which is any - in any the moment is able to gather in our country, and i think that this domoklov sword, which hangs over any power, is a certain safeguard that really saves us so far. i would like to briefly summarize the results of the survey that we conducted on the phone among our television viewers, thank you very much to everyone who participated, and let's look at the screen, i will remind you that ... we asked you about your impressions after the global peace summit, whether do you believe that it

can lead to real peace, and as we can see, 14% of our viewers think so it's possible and the vast majority 86% don't believe it, too bad? well, no, well, no, it's not a pity, it's good that people are looking at the situation realistically, it's a pity that the summit, people understand that it's a peace summit. not about peace today, not about peace tomorrow and no, not about peace the day after tomorrow, this is the coordination of political and geopolitical positions, relatively speaking, of our allies and those states that may be on our side, and peace and victory can only be ensured by the armed forces of ukraine and all of us, on all fronts and in all spheres of our lives. thank you for being with the program for a new week, you and i... now we will meet on mondays, andriy smoliy and khrystyna yatskiv, take care of yourself, believe in ukraine, develop

ukrainian and we will meet with you next monday at 8 p.m., goodbye, there are discounts present, unbreakable discounts on hepa- thrombingae 15% at travel pharmacies for you and savings. there are discounts representing discounts on urulessan. 15% in podorozhnyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime. two o'clock your time i and my colleagues will.

to be aware of economic news, it's time to talk about money during the war morchivka is next to me and sports news, i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation, two hours in the company of favorite presenters about cultural news, our tv viewer is ready to tell good evening... vasyl zima's big broadcast , a project for smart and caring people, in the evening over espresso. see this week in the collaborators program. putin

and some of the kremlin propagandists received 15 years for his willful decision to start the svo prison? russia has already said that this is an effigy, no one will talk to him at all. on tuesday, june 18, at 5:45 p.m., watch the collaborators program with olena kononenko on the espresso tv channel. verdict with serhiy rudenko from now on in a new two-hour. format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion to the malice of the day by means of a telephone survey, turn on and tune in, verdict with serhii rudenko, from tuesday to friday from 8 to 10 p.m.

good evening, we are from ukraine. greetings, dear tv viewers, my name is vasyl zima,

this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel, for the next hour and 46 minutes, i and my colleagues will be. to talk about important topics, the results of the swiss summit, what was achieved and what was not achieved in ukraine, when is the next summit and why some countries withdraw their signatures under the final communiqué. shame in munich, how the ukrainian national team was ashamed and they already say that it played his worst match in history, this time the opponent was romania, the result of the match and its discussion with yevhen pastukhov, economic news from oleksandr morchevko, and also the situation near vovchania. the enemy counterattacks, how nato treats the nuclear threat, serhii zgurets will talk about it. and actually, i invite him to talk. serhiy zgurets, director of the defense agency and leading the military summaries of the day column. serhiy, congratulations, i would like to speak to you. i congratulate you, vasyl, i congratulate our viewers. today we will really talk about two topics. the first is this nato's plans to change approaches to

the alliance's nuclear weapons and an assessment of the course of hostilities in the kharkiv region in a conversation with we are the third separate assault brigade, more on that in a moment. nato countries have begun discussions about deploying more nuclear weapons because of the growing threat from the russian federation and china. this is one of the theses of nato secretary general stotenberg in an interview with the british newspaper the telegraph. he also says that... the alliance is holding consultations on removing missiles from storage, as it is written, and bringing them into combat readiness and that nuclear transparency should be a cornerstone of the alliance's nuclear strategy as a deterrent. in fact, this article contains a number of such inaccuracies that may annoy experts, but this is more of

a journalist's problem, but in fact these are new statements by the general secretary. they are extremely important, and this is a new reaction on the part of the leadership of the alliance to the regular threats of representatives of the kremlin, to the possibility of using nuclear weapons both against ukraine and against european states. and now we are joined by oleksiy yezhak, an expert of the national institute of strategic of research mr. oleksiy, i congratulate you. congratulations. have you deciphered what the secretary general of nato is talking about, and what signal the secretary general of the alliance is sending to moscow. european countries and what changes can actually take place with nato's nuclear arsenals, primarily in europe? well , in terms of aviation, in principle, it is all aviation and b61 bombs on f-35 fighter jets , they are all basically

deployed there, they are not in such a condition that what is a reserve, they will deploy. the only thing is that of this number of bombs that are in europe, perhaps some are considered in reserve and, well, me i think everything that is already in modification 12, well, we don’t know the exact plans, how the modernization took place, it’s already drafts, maybe there are not drafts yet, but i think what we are talking about, if we actually talk about the physical part of the question, when, when there were a lot of nuclear weapons... and decisions were made, historical decisions regarding medium-shorter -range missiles, separate decisions, they are not formalized as a treaty, but they are important in relation to the drastic reduction of the arsenal of nuclear... warheads, there are generally a lot of nuclear ammunition, a lot that was destroyed artillery was destroyed, mines, a lot of things were destroyed there, but still, of the two types, well

, at least yes, two types, that is, well, the ground version of the tamahawk, relatively speaking, and pershing-2 missiles, the warheads of them were not destroyed, well, partially destroyed, and they were transferred to the reserve, in principle, even now the united states has well... a new new generation of missiles, including, i do not exclude that there are discussions about what, well, there are missiles, there are warheads, relatively speaking, where to deploy them, in principle, what was up to this day was it is known that these missiles are first of all, the americans are making missiles of a new generation of medium, well, intermediate range, they are still for the far east, but now the situation is like this, well, it is interesting. statement, i think it is symptomatic, as they say sometimes, in principle, always, starting with the korean war, nato planning and planning in the far

east, what is happening, it was agreed. now, now the situation is that two big nuclear countries with big arsenals, china and russia, and china is building up these arsenals, they are trying, well, they are conducting their policy, as i understand it, nato came to the conclusion that... all this talk about russia being able to be separated from china is already, it is already the past day, and now it is obvious that the russian nuclear arsenal can serve china, and now in in connection with this, there is such a change in politics, the politics of western countries, it consists in the fact that the united states, europe, well, you can say, if you say, a signal, what a signal, but i would interpret it as such that the united... . in the current situation, they cannot do without european allies, without the european theater in order to resist this

joint, this, well, so far it is not a threat, nuclear pressure from russia and china, that is what they are actually talking about, whether it is, whether it is necessary to divert part of the russian resources, respectively part of the chinese resources to the european theater... from what they are trying and planning to do in the far east. oleksiy, i wanted to ask again, that is, what i interpreted as a translation error, where the word rocket was used in relation to arsenals in europe, in your opinion, this is not a mistake and it is possible to return missiles equipped with nuclear warheads to europe as another element of the alliance's nuclear equipment, well... it was said, this is clearly not a plan, not a decision yet, let's see what will be written in the decisions of the washington summit, but this is

a reminder russia, that missiles and nuclear warheads are not only in russia and not only in china, and there are actually a lot of them, in general , if what kind of structure of nuclear forces is what is deployed, directly ready to fly and shoot, it is a strategic... no force , which are in constant readiness, there it’s always just a command, it flies and shoots, and there is a little lower readiness when you need to equip, let’s say f35, you need to equip a bomb, but it’s not done quickly, but not in a minute, not in minutes, it takes a certain time, but it also deployed in a smaller less ready, or naval systems that have to be loaded onto the ship, but it more or less. and there is also a reserve, what is in warehouses, and there is in this reserve, the united states allocates such and such a component, as, well, even, i don’t know, reserve, sometimes

they say reserve, but this is what, well, in principle , this is the reserve, it is ready, but there are no carriers, now the discussions are about the fact that since china and russia are combining their nuclear arsenals, the united states must prepare. before the war, as far as the balance between this union of russia and china is concerned, and without allies it is difficult to do this, firstly, and secondly, without withdrawing part of the warheads from this hedge, from the reserve and equipping the concrete carriers is also already impossible, that is is being discussed, the news is that it is now being discussed in nato, and in the united states, the united states has already discussed it, well there year. when it became clear that china and russia are united in this nuclear planning, or close to it, they talked about the fact that part of the warheads from the reserve should

be transferred to the carrier. and now nato has joined, this is an interesting new, new circumstance, well , those inaccuracies that you said, they indicate that this is only the beginning of the discussion, because there is nothing concrete yet, mr. oleksiy, thank you very much for your clear and interesting explanations, let me remind you that according to oleksiy yezhak, an expert of the national institute of strategists for strategic studies, hereafter we let's move on to the front line, where the enemy is trying, using the advantage in manpower, to push through our defenses in certain... areas, he continues his creeping mood, while receiving a decent rebuff, as is happening in the kharkiv section of the front, and now major rodion is joining us kudryashov, deputy commander of the third separate assault brigade, mr. rodion, i welcome you to kanaluso's broadcast, glory to ukraine, glory to you, i wish you and our viewers good health. what is the current situation in your battalion's area of ​​responsibility, how have the dynamics changed over time

last week and what now. is happening right now, because the general staff reported that the enemy has resumed offensive actions in the direction of kharkiv, in particular in the vovchansk area, what can be said right now, the situation is tense in the area of ​​responsibility of the third brigade, the enemy has been trying to concentrate all its efforts for the past month exactly in our direction, as a form. simulate reconnaissance data from interceptions and from information from the enemy, then we, the third brigade, are in one of the main directions of the enemy's efforts and attack, i.e. the enemy is trying to break our defensive edge with all available forces and means, against the background of what is happening, we see raid and strike actions, assault

actions, in which... the enemy uses both equipment and infantry, as well as the use of a large number infantry, which, if translated into civilian language, means that the enemy's infantry is trying to storm our front edge in large and small groups every day, today the enemy has not had any operational successes, although a lot of effort is devoted to this, yes, therefore, in general, the situation is... . is to be tense, but absolutely controlled by all our forces and means, including modern weapons, fpv, drones, which help us to better hit the enemy who is trying to storm our positions. mr. ardion, you have tremendous combat experience, you and your brigade have fought the enemy in different areas at different time

periods. how can you now assess the training and equipment of those russian units that are fighting against you now, what changes in the enemy are most threatening and what can you draw conclusions from this? well, i will say that the enemy evolves during a large-scale invasion, he tries to correct all his mistakes, which are, uh , now... all the enemy assault units are quite well equipped, they have powerful support, that is, artillery support for their assault actions and in general any -what kind of actions, and if in general, the tactics of using the enemy’s troops, it has not changed, they continue to use their two main advantages, which are the number and ammunition for means of destruction, well, in my opinion

opinion opinion, yes, according to the numbers that we see, it is an unlimited human resource that he constantly uses on the front line, again, to translate into civilian language, then for one attack an assault detachment of a group or a platoon, yes, they, we his defuse, they send the following, and thus for a month now there has been active fighting directly in our sector of the front, you and i... the battalion commander and i would like to ask how the effectiveness of a commander is determined, how do you determine the effectiveness of company commanders platoons, which ensures the advancement of the commander through the hierarchy on the career ladder, relying precisely on the approaches of the third separate assault brigade. well, the management approach we use, in my opinion...