the electoral system from the usa, it is very complicated, but it allows difficult decisions to be made at the convention in august on august 19, i would say, even the candidates are known there, there are four today, two governors of california and michigan, and the first, of course, i think, after all kamala harris, and well , everyone there always takes into account, suddenly michelle obama will change her point of view, but that's pretty much it. and hypothetically, i think that, of course, the easiest option is to rehabilitate as much as possible at the debate in september, because i will remind you that the last election, when it was on debates, then there were two rounds, because there was no third round due to covid, then at these debates joseph biden won twice, so in principle it is possible that it will be difficult for obvious reasons, or maybe simply... then it

will be forgotten and some meaningful things will still come to the fore, which will receive a lot of attention, unfortunately, i can state, with such a stereotypical, superficial, well, such not deep question, no one asked how the presidential candidate will continue to change politics, how he will change approaches , that is, there were already two completely formed... well, no just formed two presidents, both were already in the post of president, and everything was very personal, 46% of personal criticism from trump and 38 from biden, that is, in fact , there was no conversation about such deep problems, and i will remind you one thing that is very important, yes, these discussions will take place, we will see, i say, they depend on the sociological measure, but the main constituencies, for example, the republicans, who

were currently choosing the nomination from their party, all those who voted against aid to ukraine , they are, well, not all of them, many of them are not passed, and those who voted for aid to ukraine, remember, it was said then that it would harm them in the constituencies, nothing like that, everyone won 100%, took their nominations, do you think it will affect approaches, of course it will affect even in ... donald trump: if the senate is in the hands of the republicans, then this is one thing, and if the senate is not in the hands of the republicans, it is quite another, then candidate trump, if he suddenly becomes president there, then he will not be able to appoint his own people, because the senate will be in the hands of the democrats, that is, a lot of things are decided by districts, the composition of the senate there will be a game, the house of representatives, we know who approves the budget, so a lot of things. we concentrate, we focus

only on one issue, everyone understands november 5, everyone praises trump or biden, and you know, the world is so dynamic now, and black swans are flying that even, i will tell you, even this is not the final fact, by the way, in conclusion, why did everyone suddenly decide that they were, i will note. it was a debate between two citizens of ukraine, ukraine, i say, the united states of america, who do not have any now electoral status, one current president and one former president, they still have no status of candidates before the convention. well, yes, this is a very important clarification, because really they are not yet official candidates for the presidency, there is one former president, there is... the current president of the united

states of america, well, during the debate, trump spoke about ukraine, to whom biden, that trump spoke about biden, he accused him of not being able to end the war in ukraine, assured that he would not allow putin's invasion. let's hear what trump said. this should never have happened. i would settle this war between putin and zelensky. as president-elect even before his january 20 inauguration. i will settle this war, people are being killed needlessly, so senselessly, and i will settle it, i will settle it quickly, before i even take office. mr. valery, it is not the first time that he is talking about the fact that he will come to office and in almost a day there will end russia's war against ukraine. so, to what extent what he is saying now is not yet in a comprehensible status, i.e he's still... a candidate for president, but he's

saying that he's ready to win and end this war as far as that seems realistic under the current conditions and the current circumstances. first of all, i think he understands that he means that he stopped the war, in short, it is ukraine's agreement to most of the russian surrender conditions, with this option, that is, it is obvious that it will stop immediately after some time, with the territorial concessions of ukraine with everything, i.e.... what influence did he have on this, that is, apart from the conversation with putin, he will really talk, it is obvious, and with the president of ukraine, he will say two, two levers are key for him, well right away, it is the provision of weapons, because the vote of the package

of 61 billion in the congress does not mean that these funds, first of all , all have already been distributed, secondly, that they are already, well, that ukraine receives weapons for these co... weapons, that is, nothing like that, well, it is very important here that the current administration does not delay, because i see a large amount of funds that should have gone to the united states companies, they still, well, as far as i understand, not even all of them went there, that's the first thing, the second is his opportunity, let's say this, to influence the funds, which before the inauguration, half of the funds for makrafin, which... according to this law, joseph biden cannot provide benefits to ukraine until january 20, that is, he has leverage over ukraine pressure, what are the levers of influence on russia? well, if these levers, they were, of course, and he talked about them, it is at

one time the readiness to terminate the treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive weapons and to develop the nuclear program of the united states. the program for the production of strategic minnetmen 3 missiles, that is, he was proactively ready to tear it all apart, as you know, now it turned out differently, russia in fact has not yet reached it, it does it all so cunningly, as if threatening everyone, but understands that if the usa comes out of all this finally, everything, then russia will be the soviet union, and uh, so trump wanted to do it, the second lever of influence, of course, well, i... i don't think it can be done quickly, as he says, providing maximum weapons to ukraine, right there in a few days or in a month, although he is not capable of it, if he will see what putin will absolutely focus on this time, but i am a bit wary of the phrase before the inauguration, i

don't understand what it means before the inauguration, because in principle he will be the president if he suddenly changes. maybe, then this transition period, it cannot influence, especially during this period it is generally recommended to avoid any steps, because the current president ends his term, so this phrase before the inauguration can only indicate some decision, well, let's say on the budget, and you you know, it's going to be a difficult year to end because during the debate donald trump didn't give a clear answer, that he will not set the final results... from the third time i will not do it, if all the election results are, he said that yes, i will be there honestly, well, he understands yes, honestly, this is his victory, it is clear, because it will with the blackout, what will happen to the budget, will it be postponed, how will

ukraine be involved in these decisions, that is, there are a lot of issues at the end of the year, somewhere after november 5 this period, and do not forget that there is in the current house of representatives , republicans, so it's still a question of what he means by not having some presidential powers, how it will affect the establishment of peace quickly. this is alarming, because the impression is that he is somewhat following putin's timing or plans, but putin has exactly such plans, now give it your all, throw on the meat. in a month, as many as they kill and injure , well 200, that is, as many as they kill, so much to direct, there is no possibility for more, and now they are straining as much as possible until this day, then the russians, of course, expect

to push, plus difficult situations in ukraine, energy stability is undermined, well , they are still trying to hit further, but it seems to me that this is all... yes, for some reason, everyone made november 5 a critical date, i don't think so, i think that all this will be postponed to next year for sure , and then they will start. to accept some decisions even without ukraine, if someone thinks that this will happen, even donald trump, it will not happen, but we have to think, if such statements, well, this is a serious person, i mean vplivova, that is , then you have to think like your to have a weapon so as not to to depend on bans, we have seen, bans on shooting abroad, but joseph biden there himself personally made the decision at what distance we can answer on the territory of russia, he will come. there, for example, another one, he will say: and i forbid, and what will we do then, and

the missiles to petri, now we have received three more installations, thank you very much, germany, the netherlands, romania, well, it is clear that this is the decision of the united states , then missiles are additional to them, including spain, denmark, well, these countries, and what will happen next, it’s all consumables, that is, we need our own weapons, if we couldn't... convince the americans to make patriot missiles here, well, then we need to understand what we will do in such a scenario, that is, such a scenario in which it doesn't matter who it will be, it doesn't matter, we just have to understand that there is a big risk of changing the intensity, the focus of attention for this period, why i said well, that the ukraine campaign is the focus of attention, because otherwise it would be... during the discussion, you see that in the first place politics in general is the 30th position somewhere they are concerned about the americans' turn, as are we in principle

always prices, inflation, well, it's just that we have a war, and that's why it became number one, but the issue of veterans is discussed there, that is , all these issues in principle affect the company, god forbid that it be in the focus of attention, our question further, for the situation to be like today, five floors were demolished in dnipro, for it to appear there, apart from the company on... and newspapers and on television, it depends on us, but it also depends on the scattering or focusing of the attention of the americans, that's why i think that it is necessary to prepare, well, let's say so, i don't i want to say for the worst, well, you have to prepare for difficult scenarios, and to prepare means having your own weapons, which can now be stockpiled, missile weapons, such as the ukrainian shield and sword and... in the case of such political vicissitudes that may affect to the situation

at the front, to have your own backup option, then it is obvious that it is obvious to me that even donald trump will not stop the war there for a day, that is clear, but it is clear that this is such an allegory, that is, that he can just do completely how he does it, well, i'll tell you this is not such an unequivocal result, i 'll just remind you, it's a fact that during his stay as president we received the first lethal weapons, we actually knocked down this wall that was with barack obama, the provision of lethal weapons, just under him that is, it is not so simple, and with him not before, but joseph biden, of course , was immediately very skeptical about the provision of weapons there, although he supported the provision of weapons to us more than barack obama, but then, you see, under certain circumstances, he changed , therefore... i generally think that it is not for us we need to look not at who will become

president, we need to see how attentive america will be to the affairs of europe, how much it will maintain this interest, against the background of the fact that they are saying that in the coming weeks hezbollah may attack israel from lebanon, that is, and secondly, not only who will be the president, but who will i support... there will be a senate and a house of representatives. biden strongly condemned trump's position on limiting funding there or the participation of the united states of america in the north atlantic alliance, and biden said at the debate that putin could attack anywhere unless nato allies increase their defense budgets. let's hear what biden said. wants to restore the soviet empire, not just peace. he wants all of ukraine, and do you think he

will stop there, if he takes ukraine, what do you think will happen to poland, what will happen to belarus? what do you think will happen to nato countries? therefore, if you want war, you must find out what he is going to do. well, mr. valery, it seems that biden, let's say, named belarus, and not some other eastern european country. because belarus, and what about belarus? belarus is already a part of russia, well , in this situation, no one will argue there, but this discussion about the fact that putin must be stopped is... a very important discussion in these debates, and the main thing is that in these debates trump and biden, and both candidates talked about the fact that the victory of the opponent will lead to the third world war, and this too, these are interesting dialogues, i suggest you listen now about the third world war. we are

very, very close to world war iii, and he will get us there, and the president. let him win, and let putin say: do what if you want the third world, let it, nato. in this story, in this debate, well, there was no actual debate, but what to do? with the current situation with russia, and i did not hear the answers to these questions, maybe it will be at the moment when there will be an official debate, maybe i did not hear and did not perceive what biden and trump said in the same way, that is, they have different positions on what should be done with russia, well

, unfortunately, we won't hear that at the debate, because you see, i said that these debates are completely different. than between those candidates who ran for the presidency there for the first time, it is completely different, there is a lot of personal, and , to be honest, a lot of lies, there are various inaccurate data, to put it mildly, so the accusations are mutual, there are a lot of such statements, that is, what will bring the third world closer, well , i think the third world in general, at least in cyberspace, is already underway, it will already bring it closer, it is already developing, so it is possible... we are talking about, by the way, about this little was said, the position of the united states, yes, since the general phrases were there, what needs to be stopped, but there are no mechanisms, well, we don’t know yet, they are known to joseph biden, because he is currently the current president, and therefore we may like or dislike the pace and strategy of such de-escalation, or

supervision of escalation, but she nevertheless now holds... aid to ukraine and partnership with the grand coalition of ukraine, so it's a difficult, exhausting path, but at least it's clear, and donald trump, frankly, well, it's not known what kind of team, and we know how does he make decisions he can make a single decision, he can rely on the advice of someone he trusts, and that decision can be... be either very good or very wrong, i think he will have this time if he is president , and the senate will be for the republicans, there will be an opportunity to appoint the people he wants, and it is, well, it is not known whether it is better, i know who is advising him now, including, including on issues of migration, security, well,

i'm not worried about donald trump anymore, i'm worried about the people around me, because with them people... i've dealt with, and i know how they can either block something or help, and in my case, or in our case at the time, it was half the white house for us, half against, from the staff, so it's it was funny, of course, but it's funny at work, because there were situations when just energy and confidence allowed us to solve the problem, so you can work with any option, there is no plan, well, donald trump obviously does not have one, but he is such a leader, who can make bold decisions, they, i say again, they may be wrong, but the ability to make individual decisions, decisive , he has, mr. valery, but throughout

the day, i read comments on social networks and on the network of ex-pro... what, what actually happened on these debates, and many commentators pay attention to or write about the age of biden and about the age of trump, biden is 81, trump is 78, and say, well, don’t americans have younger presidential candidates who could do a lot of useful things there, given this age the backlash they have there, how? how americans perceive the fact that their leaders, their presidents, they are already at such a respectable age, is this important for american politics? and is not so fundamental and , accordingly, for the voters. god give us a system like the american one, with all their problems, and if i am not delighted that we

have no-names who have not undergone any, no work, who was a photographer and suddenly pops up, solves our issue of national security. and if i don't like the fact that we have people who worked in show business popping up, and then suddenly nothing... they have lost the trust of the voters, once in a situational moment they jump out and take high positions there, and then we sort it out, he is now running after them, then one is hiding somewhere, then he left, and then, and those there were agents at all, i like the american system better, it is imperfect, but it goes through party selection, it goes through the selection of funding by voters, that is, it is not just like that, in order for these candidates to... become in such positions, for they had to give money, and to things, everyone donates or there, well, well, to the campaign, yes, it is limited to a certain amount for

voters and for legal entities, that is, it is not such a large amount of money, if they simply supported 10-15 large businesses, then this is one story, such are supported by a huge number of businesses of both, that is, it is a selection. which has been building for decades, and the fact that they, well i will say this, there may be a moment here, well there is a moment, i will say this, i don't want to interfere in their election, but i i for some reason felt that the next president of the united states would be a woman, well, it was for some reason this feeling, it seems to me, they somehow missed, well, somehow , their historical development a little bit... they are not catching up now, they are not keeping up with it, it is the americans, it seems, that there is, and as for the attitude towards people who are wise, then - firstly, physical age,

comparable to the ukrainian age, subtract 12 years, this is a consequence of medicine, a consequence of the quality of life, products, water, i.e. somewhere here and there, well, of course, it is hard work for politicians, but... nevertheless, it affects everyone, so if a bright brain and wise decisions work, then frankly speaking, americans look calmly at some physical nuances, after the senator was in a debate alone, well, i won't name it specifically, after a stroke, immediately after a stroke he was in a debate, he won, well, you know, this story is known to roosevelt or not? four times the president of the united states, despite the fact that everyone understood the fourth term, that he is in a very difficult situation, nevertheless, they gave him confidence and, that is, the institutional machine

of the united states, the state, it is so strong that it allows decisions, well which is possible, from which point of view you asked, maybe risky, but they have a lot of different ways out of it. thank you, mr. valery, for your answer, i will remind our viewers that we are working live, we have valery chalilei, a politician, a diplomat live, and we are conducting a survey during our broadcast, we are asking you about this, do you believe that trump is able to end the war in ukraine? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, your own opinion, please write in the comments under this video, like this video if you watch us live on youtube and facebook, if you... watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote for the appropriate numbers. if you believe that trump is capable of ending the war in ukraine. 0800-211-381, no 0800-211-382. all calls to

these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. mr. valery, this week there was quite a serious and such a significant event before... before this event and before we came to this event, you and you were involved as a person who started the european integration the processes of ukraine after the revolution of dignity in petro poroshenko's team, and now we are already on the threshold of negotiations with the european union, and moldova is also with us, does this mean that the european union's decision to start changes. with ukraine and with moldova, this is actually the destruction of all geopolitical plans and intentions of putin, to turn ukraine and

moldova into... a part of some pseudo country or a new country like the soviet union, well , in fact, european politicians clearly made it clear to putin that his plans for humanitarian, military, political annexation and ukraine and moldova, well, in fact, they failed and the next stage after the start of negotiations to join the european union for these countries will be an invitation to the north atlantic alliance. this is one of the stepping stones to nato. many questions. first of all, thank you for mentioning that the process of european integration did not begin with the submission of an application, that is, a formal application for receiving a candidate. and then we heard from all the official tribunes that in two years we have passed everything here, well done, submitted an application and became candidates, and we have already opened negotiations. this process i have been going for many years, i will tell you that... i

am involved, only maybe in some interesting moments, i remember we prepared, i think, in 1990, probably the sixth year, such a report, in general, what are the copenhagen criteria, the specifics of the achievement these goals were passed on to the then president, that is , it was still then, well, a lot of people did not know about this one at all. way, although we have already decided on the essence of the european future, well, in essence, our first european deputies even and then the perception of the constitution, with which i congratulate you today, just the anniversary of the constitution of ukrainian, they determined this path, then i want to note that there were stages of integration, in fact there is one moment that no one considers, you think, i say this to those

who declare that and... integration began just yesterday, that is, or during the term of the current government, nothing like that, do you think that the stages do not pass the free trade zones, first, the association agreements, by the way, the most interesting thing, i will say, we are now within the framework of the association agreement, and we will be in the implementation for a long time of all requirements, including including the rule of law, including democracy, freedom of the press, the judicial system, and justice. criminal decisions, and no one canceled it, so please forget the euphoria, because it will be a difficult process, yes, it is very good, what a political step, the merit of the students in 2014, who came to the maidan for european integration, the merit of civil society of ukraine, which was not so oppressed as now and then it was under pressure even abroad, traveled, put pressure on this decision, that is, and today... our

government has forgotten about it, we do not have this at all interaction, i am involved in the fact that i was the chairman of the public expert council under the committee of ukraine european union, and we, the cabinet of ministers, listened, just representatives of non-state institutions, invited to meetings, european issues were raised in accordance with the legislation in the parliament, parliamentary hearings, committee and that's how we moved, that is, that's why it all started a long time ago and now... we're entering only a certain stage, and now regarding your question, is this stage the final answer to putin, at each stage of our integration, and i said that it started with the free trade zone, economic integration, then the association agreement, russia put sticks in the wheels and tried very hard to oppose it, this was happening even now in principle, so the stages are

like this... you will also see, they will try through the member states of the european union to block our negotiations, that is , to block the achievement of the opening of the next chapters, it starts with basic issues, but these are 35 chapters, 33 in six clusters and two separate ones, so they are at stages, i think will block it, in many ways, now what has been done is positive, it is really a huge achievement of the ukrainian people, and i think that... that this is exactly the dream path that many people thought about earlier, and for they gave their lives for it, and not only now, because now intensively and a lot of people are giving their lives for it, but also in ato in the 14th year, and even before that, even defending this position before...