of ukraine or passive against ukraine, that is, you know, there cannot be a greater escalation in this war, because russia is throwing at us everything that has missiles, drones, meat, and iron, and therefore there can be no escalation, and in the same way, there cannot be this bigger, even bigger unification around the fuehrer of russian peace, that is, it is not about that, dilemmas, the creation of dilemmas - this is also from the field of strategic science, from international relations, and there may be several moments here. the first dilemma is that in order to stop the offensive of ukrainian forces, it is necessary to take other forces somewhere, well , the easiest thing to do, of course, is to abandon these conscripts then, and actually it is already happening now, and of course this is a big problem, because it will not solve the security problem, but create a political and social problem inside the russian federation, of course there is an option... to transfer

troops from hot areas in the east of ukraine, and actually we are now, at least there is some information that this is happening, there is a political dilemma in that putin, for example, in order to that he lacks people, and he would need to introduce general mobilization, and again, several russian opposition politicians say, based on their sources in the ministry of defense of the russian federation, that this is not just... it is being considered, it is already planned, but this is a common dilemma that will be extremely uncomfortable for putin, that is , in fact, whatever choice he makes, this choice will reduce his, shall we say, opportunities, because now motivated people are fighting against us, they are given money from 400 to million, there is a little more correspondence to the region from where they recruit these mercenaries, but if there is...

a general mobilization, it will affect everyone, and above all the big cities, which have not been affected so far, now only volunteers came from st. petersburg, from moscow, sign contracts, receive good raises, and thus they have such incentives, mr. oleksandr, if you want to have time to ask, look, valery chaly, ex-ambassador of ukraine to the usa, wrote on his facebook that according to article 51 of the un charter, ukraine has an inherent right to individual or collective self-defense, if there is an armed attack on it, that all means... for defense, including weapons and equipment provided by partners can be used, if this is the case and whether it is the case in full, why president volodymyr zelensky, as writes the telegram publication, putting pressure on great britain to still allow it to strike deep into russia, because these are some other agreements other than what was described in the un are working, of course, well, there is a realistic approach, there is idealistic.

is based on international law, and in fact we have absolutely all, let's say, reasons for hitting russia, and it was senseless, the restrictions that were in place back in 22nd year, i will remind you that then our partners did not they even wanted us to hit the temporarily occupied crimea, but we did not listen, we struck and after a certain time it became a normal practice, the second, the second thing, this is a restriction from the side of the british, and this, i think, they didn't introduce it themselves, it was most likely a bell, let's say, from washington, because there they are afraid of escalation, horizontal, that is, the expansion of the conflict zone from the territory of ukraine to russia to other countries, and of course they fear that this is one of the nato member countries, and then the fifth article of the washington treaty on collective security should be used, and they are also afraid of vertical escalation, that is , the use of nuclear weapons. but from the very

beginning of the war we have shown that this is nuclear blackmail and bluff, and it makes no sense from a military point of view for putin to use nuclear weapons against us, this is the first thing, and secondly, that the united states the states, and many other countries, and the same china, they constantly warn the russian federation against the use of nuclear weapons, which is even in this and in the 12 points of the chinese position that was made public. in the 23rd year and in the six points of the joint common understanding of brazil and china, there is a point about the non-use of nuclear weapons, well , nuclear security in general, because russia seized our zaporizhia nuclear power plant, so all these fears, they have already decreased in size, but unfortunately, it is still in the minds of strategists in washington, and they are trying to limit ukraine's actions in order not to cause a direct clash between the allies. at the same

time, by its actions, ukraine is pushing for the whole situation to change and the red lines are somehow constantly being drawn, what we are observing, i thank you, mr. oleksandr, for joining, oleksandr khara, expert of the center. svoboda ranok was a guest of these strategies. meanwhile, the local population continues to leave the russian border. currently , governor gladkov has declared a regime on the entire territory of the belgorod region state of emergency and declared that children continue to be taken out of there. earlier, russia announced a counter-terrorist operation regime in three regions: india-obryan, belgorod, and kursk regions. the day before, it became known that almost everything left the krasnoyarsk border district of the belgorod region on... against the background of the advance of ukrainian forces in the neighboring region. evacuation continues in the kursk region, in another area that does not border ukraine, bolshesoldatskyi, evacuation was announced there. the head of this district is volodymyr zaitsev said that until now people have left on their own, while many people

remain in the district, but they do not show a desire to leave there. in general, in kursk oblast, the population of four more districts, suzhan, glushkovsky, rila and... it is interesting that the acting governor smirnov stated that the people of kurd oblast can be evacuated and these evacuees can be taken to the occupied ukrainian territories. in the telegram, he wrote that he allegedly called the occupation leader of the zaporizhia region region yevgeny balytskyi, whom the ukrainian court, by the way, sentenced in absentia to 15 years in prison. and according to smirnov, boarding houses and sanatoriums on the coast of the sea of ​​azov can be used to house evacuees from the kurt region. in the near future, as a russian official says, flights will be manned to transport people from kurshchyna to occupied zaporizhzhia. serhiy zayets is now joining our broadcast, we are waiting for me. i already see

you, mr. serhiy, greetings, lawyer, adviser of azons on the application of the practice of spl and international protection of human rights. mr. serhiy, congratulations, thank you for joining. it was unusual for me to adjust. to this conversation in view of the fact that earlier on the air we met and talked about the violation of the rights of ukrainian citizens due to the russian-ukrainian war, due to the armed aggression of the russian federation, at this stage of this war we and the advancement of ukrainian forces on the territory of russia, in kurshchyna , another topic arises, and i understand that international law does not currently interpret this as the occupation of russian territories by ukraine, how is this correctly defined now, how is it formulate? by the way, ukraine has already said, the ministry of foreign affairs said that they do not claim to be on the territory of the russian federation. greetings katerina, the situation is really very unusual, because we actually learned to talk for 10 years from the side of the victim

of russian aggression, but now the situation has changed, and when we talk about the presence of our troops. on the territory of the russian federation, then it is a mirror, a mirror in relation to those rules that can be applied to the assessment of its actions by the ukrainian authorities on the russian territory, and this is where the interesting begins, because when we say a on the one hand, we can talk about abstract and... legal norms about how it should be regulated, and on the other hand, we can, we have to focus on political decisions, and from the point of view of legal norms, we have a mirror situation, as i said,

the same norms apply, but when we talk about political decisions, the situation is completely different, that is, you mentioned occupation, well , occupation, if... to put it very simply, it is the establishment of control over the territory of another state by with the help of the armed forces, and this, it is probably happening, it is difficult to say to what extent the armed forces of ukraine really control the territory of the russian federation, we have very contradictory information, and this is not an issue that we need to solve now, but i wanted to... emphasize something else, which actually the word occupation is such a neutral legal regime, such a legal order that is established on a certain territory that is controlled by the armed forces of another state, it is not good, not bad, it

is so, it is a matter of fact itself, and a situation that concerns the presence of ukrainian armed forces on the territory of the russian federation. is radically different from what russia is doing, because ukraine really does not claim to appropriate these territories, and what the country is doing is not an expression of the armed aggression that the russian federation has launched against ukraine since 2014. therefore, the presence of our troops, we can simply consider it in two contexts, from the point of view of international humanitarian law and from the point of view of human rights law. if we look at it from an international perspective of humanitarian law, then here... it is necessary to explain, because sometimes at trainings, even for

people who should know what it is about, when i ask what international humanitarian law is, they very often answer that it is about humanitarian aid, in fact , it's not, international humanitarian law, it's about how the armed forces should behave, it's the rules of war, to put it very simply, that is, it applies to civilians, right, because international humanitarian. the law is not quite like that, it refers to, first of all, to the armed forces, to the armed forces of ukraine, if we are talking about the presence of the armed forces of ukraine in the kursk region, but it also determines a certain status of people from the occupied territory, what guarantees they have, what they are protected from, and so on, what, what, what is allowed by towards them. red flags, what can’t be, well , obviously, what we saw after the deoccupation

of kyiv region, there is no such thing, every ukrainian understands that, and, that is, what are the red proportions, what the ukrainian military should pay attention to, we have already seen, by the way video how the ukrainian military conducts a dialogue with the locals in the ukrainian language, there the military tells that, whenever there is an opportunity, they take someone somewhere, that is, how should it be, they should provide some, i don't know , transport, some humanitarian aid. should ukraine already bring water and food there, or should we simply let the russian federation evacuate its people who want to continue military operations there, what are the red proportions? well, there are actually certain political solutions here, that is, it is possible to organize a green corridor for evacuation, if it is from a point of view security and politically expedient, or. it is possible to provide for the population that ended up in

the occupied territories at the expense of ukraine. here it is a matter of policy, what can't be done, you can't forcibly move the civilian population from these territories, except when there is a threat to these people from hostilities or from some, possibly other factors. that is, if people refuse to evict and their eviction is not due to any threat, this cannot be done. if we are talking about the immediate zone hostilities, then evacuation is possible, but this is not displacement, but evacuation, to put it more simply. that, accordingly, if ukraine controls these territories, then the issue of, ah,... food, water supply, some kind of current life activity of the population that paid off,

ended up in the occupied territory, this also depends on ukraine. in fact, if we take a step back, what our military personnel can and cannot do, but we have one minute, mr. sergey, i apologize, first of all, they should distinguish between military and civilian objects, and civilian objects do not have. in no way subject to attacks, attacks, confiscation, anything, property cannot be touched except when it is due to military necessity, that is , the civilian population, it can suffer from armed conflict, but to the extent that it is related to the interests of our an offensive, a raid, i don’t know what to call it, different terms are being used now, we will learn about it later, that is, it may be a consequence, but not a direct application... targeted against the local population, we we cannot do all the things that we have accused

the russian federation of for 10 years regarding the events in crimea or donbas. yes, well , about these, about the violation of human rights, it is not necessary to say that in ukraine they know, maybe they formulate so much and accurately, and that, but of course, during the 10 years of this war, and you and your colleagues have done a lot to talk about it talked more, obviously ukrainians understand such global basic things regarding rights violations. was a guest of svoboda ranok. thank you to all our viewers for being with us, for your support, like, share these videos on your social networks, write comments, share your vision, this is really important, we are with you every weekday morning from 9 o'clock on the air of tv channels and on youtube, on the radio liberty channel, join us and see you.

do you want to wake up as if you were a child with your grandmother , full of strength and energy? then the new product from mattress market is just for you. meet the feather mattress dreamlight. the perryina dreamlight mattress smooths out all the unevenness of old mattresses, sofas, folding beds, it can be laid for sleeping just on the floor. soft, comfortable, beautiful, and so affordable. only from uah 499. ordinary toppers cost one and a half, two and even 300 hryvnias. and we offer. you can get an extra-quality buckwheat mattress for only uah 499. the economy is incredible, soft, fluffy, hugs like a cloud, resembles a real grandmother's buckwheat. you no longer need to spend crazy money on a new bulky mattress, everyone can upgrade their mattress from now on. you will get the same comfort in incredibly high-quality performance from only 499 uah.

a profitable solution. the perina dream life mattress is suitable even for people with a large mass bodies there were no slips or deformations. the sperina dreamlight mattress provides an ideal microclimate during sleep. it dries quickly, does not absorb moisture, is completely hypoallergenic. we use extra quality materials. the uppers are made of the softest of nose-resistant microfibers and the filling of sintepon with the addition of wool is the perfect duo for your comfort. an elastic band will add convenience. the mattress is pleasant to the body, provides excellent support. it is not hot in summer, warm in winter. careful execution, thorough quality control, maximum durability. be sure. inflatable mattress. will serve you for many years, besides , it can be washed in a regular machine, and other mattresses are capable of this, provide yourself with perfect comfort, without tiresome shopping trips, without unnecessary expenses, without the hassle of delivery. order the perina dreamlight mattress, and you will have it in the near future, which is durable, easy to care for, the perina dreamlight mattress only from uah 499.

this is such a benefit! instead of buying a new heavy mattress, order a dreamlight buckwheat mattress and enjoy your quality and... with any dream of the pirina dreamlight mattress , call! we are back, we thank our colleagues for their work, we thank you for your donations, because already in the morning we have 14.5 plus on the account for drones and rep tools, keep it up? yes, you will see the qr code, here it is already there, which means that our three teams, fpv and rere will definitely help in the hot section. from the eastern russian-ukrainian front, and it seems that thanks to the russian public, because they listen and do not remain silent, we learned and received confirmation that perhaps this was one of the most successful, most massive strikes on russia, since their air defense operated in eight regions, we paid

attention specifically to strikes on airfields. because when the ministry of their fairy tales, i don’t know, the ministry of defense tells a fairy tale that they shot down 117 drones, it is absolutely strange, because maybe they shot down 117, how many should there have been in order for there to be such consequences as there are, i will tell about them now , and secondly, they post videos, and as we saw, this savasliyka airfield, from which we always have air danger and anxiety on a national scale, is where the migs take off from... it is there thanks to these good russians who post videos , to 10 explosions, they themselves confirm, even filmed uav flights. also , two more airfields were hit, in addition to voronezh, there are two airfields around it, one of them has such a strange name baltimore, so this is exactly the airfield from which su took off and dropped these

cabs on the kharkiv region, maybe we can relate to this to know what the people of kharkiv told us about today... less about the fact that it became calmer, fewer strikes, fewer attacks, in fact, in one word, these results are related to each other. now about how the world is respond, in particular, to kurdish operations and further support for ukraine, we will talk with stanislav zhelikhovsky, candidate of political sciences, international expert, mr. stanislav, congratulations, glory to ukraine, congratulations, glory to the heroes, so let's start, probably with the fact that for the first time ... us president joe biden commented on the events in kurshchyna in russia and said that he was in constant contact with kyiv and informed. and the events themselves create a real dilemma for putin. what did president joe biden mean by the word "dilemma for putin". well indeed

now the united states of america and ukraine are carefully exchanging information regarding the operation concerning maneuvers in the territory of the kurdish region of the russian federation, and this will reveal a very important development of the russian-ukrainian war, because after all... it changes the situation that took place during many months, which means that it is necessary to really coordinate with our western partners, and above all with the united states of america, the actions that will follow after the ukrainians have crossed the russian-ukrainian border, well obviously now it is difficult to say what the real tasks were, so we cannot fully analyze uh... this whole operation and accordingly how far this operation was planned together with the western community, but in my opinion, nevertheless, communication in this direction was taking place, and

understanding that now joseph biden wants to show that he can really do something effective for the domestic policy of america and for its foreign policy dimension, he is the main one. in a way that concerns just that of the russian-ukrainian war, i think he knew about this operation, but of course officially only now the americans confirm that they are receiving information about what is actually happening there, well, regarding what he said in the context of the dilemma, well, it is possible it is connected precisely with the turn of the russian-ukrainian war, with the turn of hostilities that are taking place. which obviously put putin in an awkward position considering the fact that he did not expect such, such a move, such a military maneuver on the part of the ukrainian

state, after all, putin understood that all hostilities are taking place on the territory of ukraine and that russia is not, in principle, under such blows, under such threats that it needs to face real hostilities on its own soil. which can be said for the first time since the second world war, and so, i think that biden made it clear that if putin does not want to end the war, if he does not want to sit down at the negotiating table, such operations can continue in the future with unknown consequences for russia itself, because obviously, even if you read a lot researches of the press, mainly in the west, all, well, the majority agree that this is true. the operation to arrest putin znenatsk and put him in a very unfavorable light and obviously not only this light, well, it is his

such unfavorable position refers to the foreign dimension, accordingly it also applies inside russia itself in front of russian society, because obviously russia was not ready for this, we see how poorly prepared and defensive capabilities were in this region. as well as in others that are adjacent to ukraine, and that's all the front of hostilities, and we see how, how inefficiently the services of the russian federation cope and the like, but actually we see that putin actually suffered, well , received a considerable, let's say, a slap, precisely from this kurdish operation, so accordingly , if he continues to resist and prefers to continue. well, against ukraine, it will obviously sharpen him even more, because it is already quite obvious that russia is absolutely not as powerful and not as

threatening as the russian leadership wants to show it, and by the way, this is a very important signal for our western partners, because after all, they previously saw any escalation on the front as a threat to themselves, that it could turn into some poison. not a conflict and the like, but now we see that the ukrainians are operating on the territory of the russian federation, even moving forward, entrenching themselves somewhere, and we see that, in principle, everything is going according to plan, we hope that it will continue to be so, and therefore this means that ukraine needs to help even more and send even more positive signals, in particular in the context of being able to strike across the the territory of the russian federation. about this, mr. stanislav, i want to ask further, we understand that the world, and especially the general public, love winners, love the successful, and of course, that there were hopes after such a

not... unexpected success after this surprise at the kurshchyna, that the green light we will actually be given in the field of use of missiles and other weapons at distant locations in russia, in britain they say no-no-no, no stormsheds for strikes on kurshchyna, in particular, there is a task for umierov to come up with something and develop a plan to get this permission , what diplomatic ways do you see to implement this in the... in the near future, is it possible in your opinion? well, in fact, ukrainian diplomacy and the ukrainian authorities have been working for a long time to ensure that these permits can be obtained, we remember that this applies to both british and american colleagues, but we see that indeed the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi instructed the minister of defense to well, to develop such a plan so that it is possible to remove these restrictions, but by

the way, a similar, similar, similar request. was from from ukraine, when in when representatives the ukrainian authorities worked in washington, and then they also wanted to get permission to use american atakams missiles, but so far we have not received a green light from either london or washington, but i think that we need to get permission first of all on this from the american partners, and i think that... british colleagues and many other countries, which provide us with such types of weapons, so that we can really strike all the targets that are on the the territory of the russian federation, i.e. much further than that, than it is now, well , we see that just these days there was a visit to us from ukraine by american senators linzi graham and richard blumenthal,

who called on the administrator. joseph biden's proposal to remove restrictions on strikes on russian territory by american long-range weapons, i don't know whether biden will hear them or not, but for me it all depends on how successful this operation will be, how long it will last and how urgent it will really become the task of advancing further and striking targets on the territory of russia, i do not rule out that we will be able to get this permission, and maybe biden will still accept it. decision, but again, we don't know how much he is connected with the election campaign, because on the one hand, he supposedly won't take part in the presidential race, and he supposedly has more room for maneuver, but again after all , the democratic party is saving for its representative to win in the elections in the usa, meaning kamala harris, and also for them to have

greater presence in the american congress and so that this permission does not interfere precisely with the domestic political field of america and so that it is not used, for example , by donald trump or the republican party, which should also not be ruled out, because whatever they do there, it can always be reversed by political opponents the other way around, again we'll see, hopefully we'll get the green light after all, because we definitely need to... we need to get it to be able to really operate, because warfare is asymmetric, and obviously ukraine should be able to strike those blows that would be able to get closer, it is really important, mr. stanislav, thank you for the conversation, stanislav zhelikhovsky was with us , a candidate of political sciences, an international expert, and he mentioned, in particular, the visit of two senators who promised in september party support, because blumenthal and gren are preparing the very bill that should

be approved. aid to ukraine is already in the form of a law, just in case the next president has something against it. news time on the espresso tv channel, khrystyna parubiy and all the news editors have already worked, prepared a selection of the most important information and will share it with us. christina, we give you the floor for this. thank you, colleagues, there are new details of the attack on russia, what is happening there, i will tell you in a moment, so...