tical turbulence , questions also remain, the political process in the states continues, in your opinion, will ukraine not find itself again in the conditions that existed at the beginning of this year, at the end of the previous one, when there was a delay in financing the appropriate means to conduct defense, and whether ukraine's other partners have drawn conclusions, relatively speaking, whether europe will be ready in the event of that to provide ukraine with the necessary... to conduct a defense operation, this is actually a constant challenge, and this is what russia is counting on, because positional wars, on attrition is a very difficult thing in terms of attracting further attention and resources, people lose interest, people lose focus, and this is what russia is also counting on, that is, to weaken one of the two consensuses that ukraine should be helped, this is how we see those discussions, are going

to the usa, and we do not particularly like some of these discussions, but still, i would not make any hasty conclusions about there, for example, donald trump under the conditions of coming to power, including the fact that, look, in the usa, sociological surveys clearly show that 2/3 of americans are in favor of continuing support for ukraine, that is, yes, there is a certain segment of skeptics who, based on their ideological views, would not particularly want to help ukraine and it is difficult to work with them, we need to work with... the wing of the republican party, which is there for various reasons, interests in opc, interests in foreign trade, it is in favor of continuing to support ukraine, there is an interesting point here, which i think is a little optimistic, because when we remember this vote that was in april, okay, in the house of representatives, the majority of republicans voted against , unfortunately, from the republican faction, but in the senate, almost 10 senators were additionally added to the republican party, and the senators represent the state. not some particular

electoral district, but a state, for example, in the majority of the so-called red states that vote for republicans, there is the american opc, or texas, texas, arkansas, other states, yes, absolutely, and this, and this who you can work with and the mood of the voter is still the mood of the voter, in fact, on the other side is europe, and europe can not only produce some ammunition for us, but also buy from the usa, for example, and even donald trump will agree, i think, to sell ammunition, and here exactly the problem is that, okay, the europeans will develop the production of artillery ammunition for gavbets , but there is also ammunition for air defense, there is ammunition for mlrs, in fact, there is another nomenclature of ammunition for which europe cannot fully provide us, and therefore we will still have to turn to the united states of america. after all, see, there are promises

there is trump, what will i try in the case of what to bring it to a settlement? first, i think he will understand how difficult it is, and he will not be able to go completely against the will of the american people and against the mood of the american people, and this attitude that any settlement, it will not involve the need for further aid in order to it was steady and long and long, i think trump will understand that too, but also in the end . any settlement, well, let's imagine, for example, settlement just there stabilization of the front line, it will already be sanctified by, for example, donald trump, and would putin dare to challenge donald trump, who is a man, well, we see so sharp, and anything that is seen as a challenge to him can be perceived negatively, so i would not engage in excessive fatalism, of course we it's difficult, of course, it's a challenge for us every year to attract help, but we have an appropriate argument, we have... a

lot, if friends, actually, people who actually carry out active activities, advocacy for us, and we still came out from russian shadows, because even after the 14th year, unfortunately, we did not come out of the russian shadow, after the 22nd year we came out of the russian shadow, we are perceived as something different, as something separate, and they understand why it is necessary to invest in the ukrainian security, and actually have already invested in ukrainian security, so much so that any abandonment of ukraine at will. it will no longer be the failure of ukraine, but the failure of the west itself, that is, this is the same moment that significantly limits the room for maneuver for our partners, from the point of view of simply drawing a certain line and saying: that's all, we have enough, that's why no, from the point of view of attracting resources, at least for strategic defense, we can continue to do it, you already mentioned that russia is making efforts not only in the military sphere, but also in the political sphere, and it is certain that in particular it was in this direction.

the statement made by vladimir putin is actually an ultimatum regarding peace talks, do you think that in general such an element as peace talks is somewhere from... now on the horizon, well, again, everything depends on those conditions, sooner or later we will talk with the russians the question is that at that point they accept several things, the key of which is that they cannot move the front line here and now and in the long term, if that happens, it will already significantly strengthen our negotiating position, make any settlement more actually stable, but in general, negative things usually happen, because in the... two years that have passed since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, that ideological vacuum that was palpable and obvious in the first months, it has been filled, and filled with very terrible things, some russian leaders go so far as to openly say that

there is a direct conflict between the security of russia, as they imagine it, and the existence of ukraine, that is, there cannot be one if the other exists, and this, of course, makes it much more difficult for us. any settlement and not a very peaceful coexistence, if we get to that stage, of course, and this again brings us to the point of going to the partners and saying, look, if you think that after some document, there will be a period, when it will not be necessary to invest in the defense of ukraine, well you are very wrong, that period has long passed, and any permanent settlement in order for it to really have an appropriate character and it would be desirable if the end... ultimately it will require resources precisely because there has been such an ideological change in russia, the change is much worse, when ukraine is shown to be an existential threat by the russian leadership, and the security of russia is defined in such a way that ukraine should not exist as a sovereign state even there, so

yes, from this point of view, everything has become much worse and there may be a situation when putinism without putin, in fact, there is no longer an ideologue, the main inspirer, but the ideology has survived, and after how much they were pumped up, that is, how many years must pass before the corresponding ideological framework changes, so there are certain markers that will allow us to talk about that this settlement, this or that settlement will have a permanent character, here, but from the point of view of peace, which will not require any investment from our partners, we have passed this period, in connection with the ideological degradation that took place in russia. .. federation for the last there almost for 2 1/2 years, and actually for coexistence with russia, ukraine is looking for safeguards, in particular on the way to nato, the summit ended, the declaration stated that ukraine would be supported in nato on the irreversible path to

integration into the alliance, or in fact does it change something, or is it just another, documented statement that actually has no effect on us? there is one obvious problem in relations with nato, and it is obvious from the bucharest summit, in fact, despite the fact that circumstances are changing, changing in the worse side, about what suits our partners, if, sorry for tavology, partnership model, that is, we are ready to give you weapons, ammunition, training, training of your personnel, there management level, intelligence, but we are not ready for your membership, and as a result... every new summit has a certain challenge to hide this reluctance, to actually speed up ukraine's movement towards nato, to hide the fact that they are comfortable with the model of such a partnership, an enhanced partnership, and in fact in this

way simply prolong the situation further, so last year we saw it, we saw it this year, if nato is preserved, continues to function, then we will have the next summits. the same problem for nato, as on the one hand the wording, the relevant dates, but these wordings will rather hide the lack of desire to join ukraine to itself, in fact to make it the 33rd member of the alliance, but this does not mean that we should abandon the corresponding goal, because the very question of membership is, as it were, the tool by which we can receive this or that help practically, that is, our task to formulate only for... and we do it, we argue it for many reasons, why it is beneficial for us, why it is beneficial for the west, for euro-atlantic security, the west must answer, and in the process, of course, it may not find what we most needed, membership, but he finds additional help, so as a kind of irritant that

makes the western bureaucracy move, it is a very important tool, but this problem is unfortunately not going away, we will live with this problem, and despite ... everything should be evaluated on this, as for me, the nato summit, such summits here and now from the point of view, and was something done to actually disrupt the russian theory of victory there, this is their plan, certain steps were taken here. what air defense systems have actually been promised to us, and also the promise of 40 billion euros to provide assistance next year, is it enough, probably not, but better with it than without it, and so we continue to knock on this door in order to get practical assistance, in the matter of membership and for some time we will see a situation where we and our partners have different expectations, and as a result this conflict of expectations will be hidden behind one or the other. wording without any, unfortunately, real progress so far, you

touched on the topic of victory strategy quite often in your answers, and you had an article about what the victory strategy should be and the time to start a public discussion, i wanted to clarify, in your opinion, it's not like a slogan, it's a statement about what politicians say, that you need to leave at the border in 91, it's not enough in your opinion, well, first of all, thank you, what did you mention? article yes, it was an attempt to fill a certain conceptual vacuum, because it feels like there is a certain disorientation in society, we understand that we are at war, but what are our goals here and now, what are our achievable goals here and now, how do we, how are we going to achieve them here and now, in relation to this there is a lack of discussion, this is very dangerous, i explain in this article, as well as many other points, see, the task of strategy is to correctly balance several things, it is ... such a triangle, which is about goals, resources and tools for achieving resources , and the task

of any higher military-political management is to find the right balance, it's never going to be perfect, uh, because again we come back to this contradiction when we have to attack, but for now we only have the resources to defend, and it would be good if we defended effectively, without losing people and territory and inflicting the maximum level of damage, that is, there will be no such ideal scenario. but our task here and now, taking into account all the variables, diplomatic, political, military of various military levels, to find this correct balance, and this balance then, to give people to form a consensus around it inside the country and give it to the partners, because the partners also expect a realistic certain plan from us, i even remember such an article in politico after the aid package was approved, this large one for 61 million, what the white house is waiting for, and what ukrainian plan is realistic, so the main task of the strategy in this, in terms of borders,

is, you know, this is something that can be communicated very clearly and most people will understand it, our main task is actually to launch post-imperial transit in russia, and this post-imperial transit can happen even if, for example, we do not liberate all our territories. and it may not happen, even if we can liberate all our territories, that is, even such a paradox can be, that is, our main task is to lead russia to certain political changes, and this is a little more difficult to communicate, so i understand why they chose the appropriate thing , and indeed the territories, people, our fellow citizens who are currently in the temporarily occupied territories, this is really what should push us to appropriate actions, but our real political task is to start the russian post-imperial transition, so that the russians do not,

if they frame their security accordingly, or what it is to be a great power in the 21st century, because they still cling to the 19th century idea that a great power is the one that can dominate other states, instead of the big state being the one that lives there normally, economic development, social development, that is, this is our main task, but it is much more difficult to communicate than the borders of 1991, the task strategies - it is... to find the right balance in this triangle, because if it is not found and is not implemented, then it is clear that it becomes more difficult in the process of the war, so this is the task of the strategy, and the desire, and the goal of this article was precisely the first , if raising these issues for a wider readership and showing how we can actually act is not the best option, and i understand that many may not like this article, because it does not promise a quick complete defeat of the russian interspecies grouping, but how me our tasks, and i them at the beginning of the article determine, it is indeed on the one hand to inflict

maximum damage on the enemy, while preserving our people, the territory, but also to remain as a functioning state and nation and not to undermine the consensus within, if we can balance all these tasks and pass the next year and a half there, then we we approach certain conditions that will allow us, well, to say with more confidence, it is not optimally possible. but it is realistic, because otherwise this effect of disorientation will only increase and mobilize the country in a broad sense, not only people for conducting hostilities, but in general for... maintaining a war will be much more difficult, so yes, this is like a bell for me that, let's say so, the corresponding task is ripe and even overripe, and it is necessary something should be done about it, because otherwise negative trends will actually increase, but again, you see, we can go back to the first world war, to its analogies to

the lessons of the first world war, well, we can also look at... period of 1916-17 , a certain apathy, a certain disorientation, it has already begun to increase, it has increased in all countries, both in the entente and in the central powers, the question is to find the optimal strategy to pass this crisis period in fact, and it is within our power to do so. thank you for the conversation, thank you for the invitation. there are discounts until independence day on baneocin 20% at psylshynic bam and ochadnik pharmacies. maria

gurska meets with the head of the committee every week of foreign affairs of the polish sejm by pavel koval, the polish government's commissioner for the restoration of ukraine. as always, we talk about the most important things that happened this week in poland, ukraine, and europe. what is being said about ukraine in the eu, how should we perceive the statements of european politicians and what will our accession to the eu look like. in the project close to politics , close to the world with maria gurska. every sunday at 15:30 with a repeat at 22:00 in cooperation. from sister au. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp delivery facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresin had done so, he would have gone to prison. a special look at the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish is rotting from the head? no, not off the top of my head. but beyond it. and then who is china? me, my heart

hurts. all this in the informational marathon with mykola in september. saturday - 17:10, sunday 18:15. on espresso. new week on espresso. weekly summary information and analytical program. a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, an analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts of the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join the discussion. spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andriy smoly every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. the television premiere of a documentary film about the most difficult 10 years of our lives through the personal stories of extraordinary ukrainians. public activist roman ratushny, journalist and military officer tetyana chornovol, the founders of the taira angels unit

yulia paevska, writer svitlana povalyaeva. about how we changed, what lessons we learned and... who we will never forget in the tape 10 years of war. exclusively. on the air of the espresso tv channel. for more than 10 years, russia has been waging a war to destroy ukrainians, our state, and our historical and cultural heritage. the enemy destroys buildings, conducts illegal archaeological excavations, appropriates museum artifacts and archives. the russians are trying to eliminate as much as possible of what constitutes the ukrainian identity. according to the data according to the ministry of culture and information policy of ukraine, only during the period from february 24 , 2022 to april 25, 2024, the russian federation destroyed or damaged 1,062 objects of our cultural heritage, including 123 monuments of national importance.

kharkiv oblast and kherson oblast suffered the most from the aggressor. next comes donetsk region, odesa region, chernihiv region, kyiv region. and kyiv. these crimes began back in 2014, when russia not only illegally occupied ukrainian territories, but also began destroying and looting cultural monuments. during active hostilities actions in the east of ukraine, the russian troops dug in in burial mounds and settlements. how many mounds were destroyed is not known for sure. according to the calculations of the ukrainian historian serhii telzhenko, there are at least 60, and if... what to take also the occupied part of luhansk region, the number is much higher. after the occupation of the crimean peninsula, contrary to the norms of international humanitarian law , russian scientists began to carry out illegal archaeological excavations. they appropriated valuables and exported them en masse to the territory of the russian federation. since december 2017 in the buffer zone of the museum

the occupiers of the chersonese tavriysky reserve began to dig everything in a row. they removed a considerable collection of dishes. metal, glass, stone and bone products, jewelry, lamps and more than 600 coins. according to ukrainian experts, during the occupation of crimea, russia exported as little as possible. million archaeological artifacts. in october 2022 , the russian occupation authorities announced the so -called evacuation of the kherson regional museum of local history. the russians ransacked the archaeological and historical exposition, stole archaeological finds. today's place the whereabouts of these museum objects is unknown. the fate of the collection of skivsk gold from the melitopol museum is also unknown . exhibits from the occupiers, ukrainian museum workers, as in the second world war, even froze the exhibits in the walls and buried them in the ground, however, the russian marauders got

to that. at first, the occupiers claimed that the collection remained in melitopol, then it came to light in the cultural center in berdyansk, where the collection is actually located and what is the exact list of those stolen by the russians exhibits of skov gold - an unanswered question . cultural heritage. this is a very important story not only for ukraine, but also for the international community as a whole, because we are such a part of the world's cultural heritage and must be protected taking into account various tools of interaction, therefore, as of now , we have more than 2,000 objects of cultural heritage and infrastructure damaged and destroyed, and now we have such an outcome in cooperation with law enforcement agencies as much as possible to document these damages in the context of bringing to responsibility in the international arena of those guilty of. what is happening here in ukraine. according to unesco, ukraine needs $9 billion over the next decade to rebuild its cultural sites and

tourism industry after a large-scale russian invasion. the organization also notes that the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage objects, including religious buildings and artifacts, can be equated to war crimes under the norms of international law. tatiana in the pharmacies psyllium, bam and oshchad, there are discounts until independence day on magne b6, 10% at psylshynyk, bam and ochad pharmacies, there are discounts until independence day on motorex pills, 10% at psyslynyk, pam and ochda pharmacies. vasyl zima's big broadcast, my name is vasyl zima, this is the big broadcast on

espressu tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component. serhii zgurets and how the world lives. yuriy fizar is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening, two o'clock, what... to be aware of economic news, it's time to talk about money during the war oleksandr morchyvka is on the field with me and sports news, i invite yevhen pastokhov to talk, two hours in the company of favorite presenters, about cultural news, alena chechchenina, our art watcher, ready to tell, good evening, presenters, who have become familiar to many. vitalka didenko, already next to me, is ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as the distinguished guests of the studio. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening at espresso. greetings,

this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already approached the serpent himself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live kamikaze drone attacks. political analytics, objectively and meaningfully. of the political season, exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. shot, svoboda life - frankly and impartially. you draw your own conclusions. verdict with serhiy rudenko, from now on new, two-hour format. even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests: foreign experts, inclusion from abroad. about ukraine, the world. front society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion on a bad day with the help of a telephone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, from

wift. hello everyone, have a nice day, this is a project without armor on fm halychyna, my name is andriy zholub, i hope you have finally remembered what i look like and what i am talking to you about, our next issue, to be more precise our current issue, our current guest and our current conversation... will be in the medical direction, but here we will not talk about medicine on the battlefield, here we will talk about medicine at such an extreme stage of evacuation in a large hospital, in a large hospital, and first i'm ready to show and introduce our guest, so ostap zubach, ostapchyk, please introduce yourself, hello everyone, my name is ostap, i'm a ukrainian doctor,

well, thoroughly, a traumatologist. we don't have anything more to say, right? ostape, please tell me how they differ from each other civilian patients and those patients who are brought from evacuation, because the anatomy is rougher and the same, in principle, the repairs, as they say, of the human body, they cannot differ, because the human body of a military person, that of a civilian, is absolutely similar, in what what is the specifics of actually working with military patients? it's really two big differences, two big differences, two different types of injuries, completely different severity of injuries, because what we did before is fundamentally different from what we do now, and the most important thing is that we keep learning, learning on our mistakes, we continue to learn from our friends, abroad, they often learn from us, well, really, because with so

much combat trauma. i think even foreign doctors have not encountered, there is such a paradox that countries that are at war, they do not write science, do not analyze, and simply do not have the resources, strength, time, but countries that are not at war, they analyze, study this experience and they try to improve it, and in that sense , an exchange always works out, because doctors from abroad have a large baggage of their own knowledge. but they hardly have that kind of experience, you know, i have come across more than once even fellow citizens, foreigners, americans, in particular and so on, who worked there at one time in the campaigns in iraq, in syria, they worked for a week, conditionally here at the ingulets bridgehead , came out and said: guys, we have never seen anything like this in our life, we had no idea that so many things could fly at us, in fact, they will ask you whether

foreigners really have a moral right... no, doctors have to teach us for some reason, is this not an instruction, rather training and help, as it is correct to perceive, because many people express themselves, what they can tell us, they have never seen such a thing in their life, they do not know what it is about, it really depends on who you talk to, doctors who have tried this gunpowder, they are usually very careful in in their assessments, they are very professional, and they are very good... they know how to listen, most often questions arise at such a gap in qualifications, where people who had no experience at all, at some point they felt as if they were extremely competent, those doctors, foreign , who took part in iraq, in afghanistan, i had the opportunity to meet doctors from the vietnam war, they actively go to ukraine to share their experience, to...

first of all, to be involved, that is, they feel a moral, moral necessity to be here, and again, when a dialogue is established, new ideas are born at the junction of these experiences, different methods of treatment are born, because the trauma that occurs now on the battlefield is completely different, it seems that everyone has seen it, but now it is ... the newest war with the use of other means of destruction, completely different terms of evacuation, other opportunities, those countries that waged war with superior forces and had the opportunity to conduct military operations in the way they were taught, as they know how, and with the provision of such as is necessary for this, of course, they had a different experience, than the experience gained by ukraine. ostab,

please tell me. please, or rather, not even to me, but to ours...