well, i also think that putin understands that in his environment, even all these comrades from the ozera cooperative, caddy players, they are not satisfied with the way the war is being waged, and maybe even there may be after a certain time, if not slaughter, then certainly some opposition to his actions, i don't know if august, which is traditionally dangerous for any power in the kremlin , will end with putin being removed or something, god forbid. will happen to his health, so basically we saw his confusion, how to act, he didn't choose the right words, and plus he needs something was to show him to his friends xi jinping, kinchen-in and moulam in iran, because he is the leader of the largest nuclear power, here representatives of a country that does not exist invaded his territory, that is, in principle, all these things, they put pressure on him. john kirby, white's advisor. on national security issues, says that putin

is concerned about the situation in kursk oblast and is looking for ways to counter ukraine's advance to the north, but he is not ready to use nuclear weapons, to quote mr. oleksandr, john kirby. if he moves troops there, then he is somewhat concerned about what is happening. i don't know if this qualifies as an interrogation or not, but he definitely reacts to what is happening in kursk oblast. but we did not see or hear any. escalating rhetoric, especially regarding nuclear weapons in recent days, kirby noted. how, mr. oleksandr, can you explain the reaction of putin and , in general, the reaction of the russian leadership, which until now has been saying by mouth, including dmitry medvedev, that if there is a threat to the territory of the russian federation, then they will use their military doctrine, according to which they can use nuclear weapons if it

threatens the territorial integrity of the russian federation. why do we not see such a reaction from putin, does this mean that these red lines, which the kremlin talked about for so long, simply disappeared, they do not exist, and now, in principle, the whole world understands that putin and medvedev are the ones who constantly is bluffing well, you know, the white house spokeswoman, actually. said that if putin did not escalate the situation, meaning nuclear escalation, it is not means that it will not happen in the future, and in this way she explained why the policy of banning missile strikes by american systems on russian territory is still unchanged, and maybe putin and his entourage, they were simply paralyzed by the fear of what happened, understanding the possible consequences, and that's why they even completely forgot about...

the red button, but on the other hand there are other things, well, the first and most important thing is that the americans usually listen to rhetoric, including dmitry medvedev, who, for silence, has already forgotten about this red button as well, most importantly , they are looking at the possible preparation for the use of tactical nuclear weapons, by the way, the principles of the state policy of nuclear deterrence of the russian federation... among those, let's say, reasons that could lead to the use of nuclear weapons by the russian federation, there is no crossing of the border or seizure of any territory of the russian federation, there are other cases that could fit our case, for example, it is striking the systems and means of nuclear deterrence. we recently destroyed regular m-22 tu-22m, strategic nuclear.

, and this year we struck the sprn, that is, it is a system of early warning of a missile attack, and actually, according to the doctrine, then russia could legitimately, from the point of view of russian legislation , strike ukraine, but it did not even prepare for this, and rhetoric of course remained rhetoric, so i think that in the west they understand the flexibility, the elasticity of the red lines by the russian federation, they understand that... ukraine has shown the ability to change the course of this war, i hope that the kurdish operation, this is the black swan that will bury this regime, the russian federation, and of course they have no choice but to support us and help us with armed ammunition, and this is of course very relevant in the context of the elections in the united states, by the way, such a change in the position of the united states, well, if we assume that they knew that such an operation was planned. agreed to this and gave permission

to strike deep into russian territory, this means that there has been a transition in the administration, in fact the formulation of policy on ukraine in... jake sullivan to phil gordon, this is the national security adviser, camila harris, the vice president, and of course, if she becomes president, he will most likely head the national security council. perhaps they thought that against the background of those positive electoral successes, and camila harris has now somewhat detached herself from donald trump, and she has a very positive dynamic, that it is necessary to add positive news from ukraine to her portfolio. and that is exactly why we can consider that aid, an increase in aid to ukraine, reducing the number of restrictive rules, it can be invested in the election campaign of kamila garis. mr. oleksandr, in parallel with our successes in kurshchyna, we are observing activity,

information activity in the international media, in particular in the american press, and in the wall street journal it is written about the fact that... they were allegedly involved in the undermining of nord stream-2, and all this the story spread in the 22nd year that ukrainian saboteurs were allegedly involved in this, and the former chief of the armed forces of ukraine is also accused valery zaluzhnyi in this, well, that is, we see a powerful enough powerful attempt to present or, shall we say, present ukraine. on the international arena, as saboteurs and terrorists, and obviously, this is no accident either, and despite the fact that the wall street journal has a reputation as an international media there, we are still in this situation, obviously, we have to perceive it

as part of the informational and psychological special operation of the russians, or how should ukraine react in this situation and how should ukrainian. attempt to prove that it is not ukrainians who are terrorists, but terrorists in fact russians, obviously, and such a special operation, which took place at the bottom of the baltic sea with nord stream-2, could be organized by a sufficiently powerful, subversive and terrorist state, such as russia? yes, indeed, there are many technical points here, and frankly, it is simply ridiculous that on a small commercial yacht it was possible to ... transfer half a ton or more of explosives there and then, well , actually, without special equipment, mount these explosives and blow up the gas pipeline, which on 15 m buried under means soil at the bottom of the sea, and it is clear that it is simple, well, i would like

our special services, the maritime center that we have, they are really professional, good guys, but this is specific, specific. environment, and frankly, i doubt that we have such professional people and the most important equipment that would allow us to do this, in any case, our partners should be shown evidence and not just what someone said there, or in the camera recorded people of some kind of athletic appearance who are loading something onto a yacht, that is, let's take a look the fact itself, the second point, is the positive reaction of germany itself, where it was already said that... even if they were ukrainians, it will in no way affect the support of ukraine, because these are unrelated things, the protection of ukraine from a genocidal war and what happened to nord stream 2. i looked at the reaction

of the western expert community, american, british, and others, in general , european in general, they ask questions absolutely in the ukrainian way, whether it was bad, even if they are ukrainians. it was bad to destroy that one the tool with which putin actually conquered europe, and on the contrary, should we not conduct an investigation into the role of schroeder, merkel and many others who, despite, let's say, the objections of ukraine, despite the advice of the same trump, remember how at the session of the general assembly the un, he told the germans that we are protecting you, and you are building gas plants and are going to buy more gas from russia, they then... smiled, so in principle, the situation is like this, let them show the evidence, let's see, i don't think that the ukrainian authorities it is necessary to do more than she did, because she denied our involvement, i honestly do not think that the situation was such that zelensky first gave the green light, and

then stopped this operation, but someone else, whether it was lazuzhny, or budanov, i don’t know who else, just ignored the president and decided to... carry out such an act, so i think we just need to keep calm, not react to these provocative things, and i absolutely agree that in a strange way this... news, it came out when the ukrainian military perform an important mission in kursk, and of course, this partially interrupts the agenda of information, on this information market in the west. well, you have to remember that in the early 2000s, you remember, there was the whole story with chain mail, when they tried to accuse ukraine of selling chain mail to iraq, and this... the whole story was in the international, in including the press and kuchma had to make a lot of excuses and

explain that ukraine did not do this, but at that time, russian resources obviously had more opportunities and capacities than ukrainian ones in order to heat up this topic and in this way take steps to bring ukraine closer to russia, president kuchma, already then the president of the russian federation, well... at the very end, mr. alexander, trump publicly accused biden of russia's invasion of ukraine, about this, the candidate from the republican party said on elon musk's broadcast on platform x, how do you feel about such statements by trump, this is trump's campaign rhetoric, that he says that everything that happened before me, or everything that happened before the possible of my arrival, this is all wrong, is biden to blame for everything? this is a common position of the conditional republican party there, and the republicans also

believe that if it were not for biden, the situation in ukraine and between russia and ukraine would have developed in a completely different way. i think that this is trump's stream of consciousness, which his associates, the eyes of the magus, let's say , this nato, and of course ordinary americans, the republic, are happy to pick up. which refer to trump, or rather to the trump cult. i don't think there is any doubt that russia is the only one to blame, that it attacked ukraine among the conscious, traditional republicans i'm not talking about the democrats. therefore, this is exceptional pre-election rhetoric. second, you know, we live in a, shall we say , world where the ideas of the enlightenment, based on reason, on logical thinking, are in decline now, because when trump says, if i

were president, putin would not attack ukraine, in english it is called an unreal past, that is, it is something that simply cannot be verified, because in history we cannot set experiments from rewinding, that is why it is used, and unfortunately, i did not particularly see anyone protesting. at the same time, it is true that under trump there was no escalation of russian aggression against ukraine, there was not much, including, for example, an attack on israel by hamas, hamas terrorists, but this does not mean that trump stopped it, because there are certain processes, the same russian federation was accumulating forces and means, preparing, and thus undermining our statehood in other ways , and actually tried to put pressure through the minsk agreements. the united states then was not very interested in interfering in this story, therefore

i think we should just take this as rhetoric, although i'm absolutely sure that in trump's head it was, that he is the best president of the united states ever, that everyone fears him, that he can solve any problem because he is not predictable because he can actually threaten anyone with anything. that is, this is the type of personality that does not base its actions on reasoning and logic, that can change its mind, that can come up with any plan at the last minute, and that is exactly why i do not believe that he has any real plan for ukraine, i think that he is simply thinking of meeting with putin and zelensky at the same table, and with the power of charisma to achieve something, and what to achieve, well, for sure, he is currently that he does not imagine himself... himself. thank you, mr. oleksandr, for the conversation, it was oleksandr khara,

a diplomat, and friends, we continue to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, throughout our broadcast we ask you the following: can the uoc become independent from the russian orthodox church? 0800 211 381, if you watch us on tv and have a smartphone, if you believe that the ukrainian orthodox church can become independent from the russian orthodox church. no, 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free on youtube , everything is quite simple, no, or please leave your comment in the comments under this video, we can be contacted by volodymyr tsibulko, political analyst, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation, mr. volodymyr , i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today, congratulations, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, let's not start from kursk, let's start with biden and his flirting with the russian opposition, with the people that putin released, or

putin traded for his terrorists and spies, joseph. biden met at the white house with vladimir karamurza, who was released from a russian prison , and his family, and in fact, biden himself posted this photo on the x network, which was written by the president of the united states of america, today i welcomed vladimir karamurza and his family to the white house to celebrate his return to america. volodymyr spent 2.5 years unjustly imprisoned in russia for... speaking out against russia's war in ukraine, today his family is whole again, how do you, mr. volodymyr, perceive the efforts of the united states of america to find good russians and , according to tradition, probably since soviet times union to create or try to maintain

this image of some group of people who can return to their homeland and change everything there. this is such a soviet mythology, i have the impression that biden supports a certain such, well, phantom of sovietism and dissidence soviet, because he sees that putin lives by it, and biden creates a mirror for him, a mirror through which putin would see himself, so to speak, on one side of the continuum. than the scoop, the scoop traditions, and on the other hand, well, i felt powerful, like the soviet party bonzes, but we perfectly understand that the current russian federation is, it is not the soviet union at all, secondly, if we warm dissidents, or create even such a network of dissidents, then we perfectly

remember the dissident solzhenitsen, or the dissident... yanukovych, who carried such nonsense and such a chauvinistic heresy, so to speak, that it was not pulled to the head, but in principle it is important for democracy to support any opponents of the current fascist regime in russia, in the hope that something democratic will grow from these seeds, i doubt it, mr. volodymy . but the united states of america is trying to constantly flirt and show this pseudo-russian opposition, and this is also, well, the creation of some kind of false world, because as long as joseph biden will show whether there is kamala harris or

donald trump, while they will show russian oppositionists and say, look, these are the people who... can stand up to putin, until the world will believe that putin, putin is impossible, it is impossible, how impossible, to connect with everything by the people and carry out denazification, de-rasification, deputization, because putin is bad, and there are good russians, isn't washington now sending false messages to everything. well, it's not really creating an alternative to putin, it's just trying to protect those who challenge putin, it's, it's a little bit different logic, united the states, in principle, understand the current russia, and they, they think how to encapsulate it, and this regime, how to balance this regime, so that

it does not finally dissolve into the chinese regime, so that it still leaves... the whole at least semi-sub objective, because china, china sees, looks at russia as an instrument of competition with the united states, and the united states, well, in the united states there is such a, well, the idea is cultivated that if russia is pulled out of the mouth of the chinese dragon, then russia is too early is democratizing too late. firstly, russia cannot to democratize, because 30 years after the spam sent by the russians, they simply reformatted their population. and this population does not think in democratic categories, it is, by the way, very, very dependent, post-soviet, paternalistic, that

is, it looks at the state as its only regulator and feeder, that is, this population in its mass is not independent, it needs of a paternalistic guide, and because of that it cannot help but pay the price with its own life. putin must go and die for putin, they they go because they can get money for it, they think that this is such a lottery game, someone died, and i, and i will slip, and i will survive and have 20 thousand dollars in the account or something else, it is so infantile absolutely thinking, but this russian nobility is also racist, fascist, it also thinks such categories are infantile. mr. volodymyr, let's return to ukraine, because zelenskyy made several statements, and, in particular, regarding the fact that decisions should be made on

the spiritual independence of ukraine from russia, and obviously we are talking about a draft law that will ban the activities of russian religious organizations on the territory of ukraine, mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine, wrote today that the committee on humanitarian and information policy supported the amendments to the final version of the government bill on the banning of the uoc mp, and, as knyazhytskyy writes, unanimously voted to committee for the latest amendments, sought compromises, but did not retreat from fundamental issues, we will start the next plenary session of the verkhovna rada with consideration of this issue, and zelenskyy too announced that among the urgent bills with which... president zelensky addressed the verkhovna rada, there is a demand to deprive traitors and collaborators of state titles and awards. let's listen to what zelensky said. anyone who serves putin,

or justifies his war, or helps evil, does not deserve to keep everything that the ukrainian state celebrated him or her with. traitors who fled to russia after february 24, collaborators who work for the war, all... criminals who went into the service of the russian state, they should be deprived of any titles and awards in ukraine. is it correct, mr. volodymyr, i understand that on the eve of the next independence day, ukraine will meet on this day with a decision to ban religious organizations that are connected to russia and cancel the title of hero of ukraine. yuri boyka and people's artists anna lorak, taisi povaly, and other people who fled outside of ukraine.

boyka did not escape, but he is a hero of ukraine. perhaps, after all, he will fall under the category that will allow him to be deprived of this title? i will remind you that on the day of the great russian aggression, february 24, a memory. boyko went on the air before solov'ov, already, already in kyiv, houses were bombed, people died, and boyko for some reason decided that he would talk about the peoples of the brothers on the russian air. so, in fact, if the government had been consistent, then the opzh faction, or rather, even a rudiment of the opzh faction, would no longer be in the verkhovna rada, nor in the councils of various levels, in particular the councils of the otg and... in the district and oblast councils and city ones, but we see that only in ukraine in general these deputy groups in the councils of various levels were

not even dissolved, but removed from voting, even in the kyiv city council , the opz faction remains, and it votes in the same way together with its servants, well, throughout ukraine, i will interrupt you, sorry, in 2020 , more than... 4 thousand opz deputies were elected throughout ukraine, and they remained, that is, they were only repainted, well, they did not always remain, if they remained, then in many councils they were deprived of the right to vote, that is, they formally remained, because, let's say, the authorities took a strange line of behavior in relation to banned parties, some smaller batches at once. sharia, quiet they were almost expelled from the cities, but opzh remains in many councils, but in the kyiv region

the first fastiv voted. for depriving them of the right to vote, well, they remain equal in the councils, so if the government is consistent, it should also give such a gift to the ukrainians, do you think that the decision on the ocp will be resolved next week, in short, if possible , the problem is that with this law, speaker stefanchuk has already revealed several times that he deceived the opposition, and by the way, and well... in some cases, the committee correctly voted for introduction of this law, and then stefanchuk found a reason not to introduce it, well, it’s interesting, because, by the way, they publicly promised european solidarity in front of the whole of ukraine that they would start a new session with this draft law, that’s an intrigue, let’s see if they will deceive the ukrainians or not ? thank you, mr. volodymyr, it was volodymyr tsybulko,

the people's political expert. deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation, friends, we continue to work live on the espresso tv channel, we will look at the interim results of our television poll, today we we are asking you about whether the ukrainian orthodox church can become independent from the russian orthodox church, 60, 51% think so, 49% no, that is, 50 to 50. there are discounts until independence day, quoted by ramon darnytsia, 10%. in pharmacies, plantain pam and oskad. do you suffer from heartburn? i recommend izoto. isoto interacts with the acid in the stomach, which leads to a reduction in heartburn symptoms. isotaa your water if heartburn bothers you. there are discounts until independence day on gelta cream dolgit up to 30% in psyllany bam and oskad pharmacies. there are 15% discounts on linuxforte until independence day in psylansky bam and oskad pharmacies. vasyl's big broadcast

winters my name is vasyl zima, i am a big star on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component. serhiy zgurets. but how does the world live? yuri fizer is already in front of me and it's time to talk about what happened outside ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk. about money during the war oleksandr morchuvka field with me and sports news i invite yevhen pastukhov to a conversation for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters about the cultural news of chechchenin. communications mr. mustafa, i congratulate you on a good day , events of the day, in two hours, vasyl

zima's big broadcast. a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. television premiere a documentary film about the most difficult 10 years of our lives through the personal stories of extraordinary ukrainians, public activist roman ratushny, journalist and military officer tetiana chornovol, founder of the angels taira unit yulia paevska, writer svitlana povalyaeva. about how we... have changed, what lessons we have learned and what we will never forget in the tape 10 years of war, exclusively on the air of the espresso tv channel. verdict with serhii rudenko, from now on in a new, two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you can express your opinion at the end of the day with the help of a telephone

survey. turn on and tune in to verdict with serhii rudenko from tuesday to friday from 20 to 22. greetings, friends, on the live air of the tv channel. the second part of the verdict program. my name is serhiy rudenko and in this part we will talk about such a kursk ruckus for putin armed. forces of ukraine are successfully developing an offensive operation on the territory of russia, which will lead to the desacralization of the kremlin dictator. an attack on the northern stream. american journalists accuse the ukrainian side of sabotage. who benefits from the spread of anti-ukrainian hysteria in the world.