archa, whose team builds an editorial policy, and they have to implement it, that is , the impression is that we are breaking the rules by which zelensky is used to existing in the information world, in particular on the marathon tv channel, which currently form the backbone of the information policy, where everything just exists according to those , about which zelenskyi said, well, as for the prisoners, listen, well, this is funny, clearly zelenskyi had aggression towards the novel, due to the fact that he had read more than one. the article was written, first of all , you are right, serhii, regarding ukrinform and temniki, this scandalous story, let’s not do it now to delve into, which was not a surprise for journalists, but for public civil society, well, it was so unpleasant, yes, but most of the tv channels that you are watching now, friends, on television, not on the internet, not private tv channels, not independent journalism, what is, for example, ukrainian truth, and espresso, and what we do, on us. no one influences,

in zelenskyi’s opinion this is nonsense that harms their chosen strategy of victory, why there is no donbas, the pokrovsky disaster, what is there, that’s why that there is a strategy of victory, and who is hindering him in this information strategy, for him is an inconvenient figure whom he considers possible to scold, to be rude, it would be very embarrassing to observe, regarding the phrase, i will say a few words... about foreign journalists, you understand very well that the neighbor who lives with you on the next street knows much more about you than your classmate or business partner with whom you communicate on whatsapp or see when you fly to him once a three months, so he's fine a ukrainian journalist perfectly understands the background of what is happening, foreign journalists mainly ask questions.

by answering which, the journalist will not be able to appeal later, not owning, not owning, well, the whole system of negative things that we, as journalists, presidents, and civil society, point to, that we point to, like those dogs, i told yulia mostova, and the president i don't like it, because i asked a question that was even uncomfortable, shut up and listen to what they told you, the microphone will not be near you, because, well, that's why that everything should be quiet, by the way, a few... regarding viktor yushchenko, despite what i said, and it is really true, i think you will agree with me, at that moment freedom of speech, well, everything is absolutely , as far as democratic values ​​are concerned, we have improved, well, there was still something to compare to yushchenko, but somehow in one of the interviews, it seems, by the way, ukrainian truth, i said the phrase that viktor yushchenko wasted his chance to change the country , and since then victor yushchenko does not give me an interview, does not comment on anything, and we have no communication at all. no with

him, it's about how our politicians treat criticism and something uncomfortable, and it's very, very sad. well , when they are still in power, they still turn off the channels from t2, as happened with the fifth channel from the press and live, because suddenly someone in the president's office decided that we are a threat to ukrainian diplomacy, democracy and diplomacy as well, during the war, we were simply cut off from t-2 and until now we... no, we are not present in t2, and president zelensky is sitting and says: listen, you work behind the scenes there, so we created a large information the car, it works democratically, a single telethon, all those who are not in a single telethon, all are simply in uzbichka, we have already asked, by the way, i spoke on this topic with the former deputy head of the president's office, kyril tymoshenko, when did this story happen in general with the closing of three tv channels, well, first of all, i don't care, because... at least there are two or three

people with whom i constantly communicate, whose broadcasts i watch, i know that this is independent journalism, well and our rendezvous broadcast on the fifth channel will not be seen by the general public mass, to which the deputy head of the president's office at that time told me that criticism will be carried not only objectively, but also completely non-objectively, that is why we are taking risks during the war. to have such rats inside the country, that's why it has to be covered up, well, actually there, i think, everything is much deeper, and it was exclusively related to some political dividends, which i think they lost, you saw the trust-marathon ratings, here is the result of this policy , well, in this situation , i would like to talk not only about ratings telethon, and about what the country is losing, because we, well, we are already talking about the development of democracy, people are now at the front in order, not in order ... for there to be a single telethon, and

the entire information policy was concentrated in one hand and in perspective has turned into something not very good, we have already mentioned yushchenko, there were different situations under... different presidents , i can probably mention different stories here for half the program and they are not very good about almost all presidents, sorry, because we have seen all of them dear and inexpensive ones and everyone else at press conferences, so under yanukovych this story was with mustafa naim, but for some reason it was very similar to the story with roman kravets, well, there was approximately such a dialogue in... mustafa with yanukovych when he asked him about mezhyhirya, and he said that he did not envy him. well, zelensky could also say roughly the same thing, if he continued the dialogue with roman kravets a little. olya, well , we are now in such a difficult situation, when ukraine is fighting for

its freedom and independence. freedom of speech is a part of this independence, and a guarantor of this independence, freedom of expression. and when we see that someone is trying to limit it in some way or to say that journalists, you are there with some dark people, you are working with poroshenko, you are working with some other oligarch there, this is an attempt to devalue our work, this is not an attempt to simply reprimand everyone there personally, to take and create an image of journalists that is venal, that does some kind of bidding. some topics, although, well, we are sitting in the studio, there are no jailers in front of me, no one gives me any instructions, and i can say the same to volodymyr oleksandrovich, well, let him show at least some example of who is working with what jailers, like people who are

younger than us, who are in charge the state, where did they get these formulas about some dark people, about some... existence, some instructions and someone pointing to someone, i have been working in journalism for 32 years, you are already working, i am afraid to even name it, yes, i am afraid to name it, i'm nina, i've been working in journalism for a long time, well, i don't know where these people, young people, come from people, well, zelenskyi is a young man, well , a relatively young man, but where do they get it from, that someone is sitting under the table and conducting or narrating or pressing my... fingers and telling me what to say. many questions, and they are really serious and difficult questions for me, at least. well, for starters, yes, eh, without getting personal, well, as they say in a decent company, it’s not about you, and not about you,

and not about me, yes, but colleagues, well, yes, putting my hand on my heart, i’m not i can say that absolutely all editions in ukraine, er, are working without dark people, they work in such a way that you can go on the air, but you will never come here, well, that is, i will not delve into it, but unfortunately, i do not have in front of me an absolute, monolithic picture called the journalists of ukraine, that is enough such a motley, to say the least, such a canvas, here, and well... to call it some kind of unified journalistic front, which speaks either for or against, my tongue will not return. second, er, i would say that now we are not just, i will intensify it, we are not just fighting for freedom and democracy, the country

is fighting for his statehood and for life, should we live or not live, this is a philosopher of austrian origin... he was in the poper, i do not guarantee the accuracy of the quote, but it is roughly like that, so our faith in freedom, er, gives to us, hope for victory, but we must remember that the struggle for freedom can also end in defeat, in fact, we must be... ready for the fact that freedom will cost us our lives, that's roughly how i see today's the situation in ukraine, and yes, talk about freedom of speech and democracy in

a democracy in a period where there is no war, and in the period where there is war, these are completely completely different things. first and most importantly, since we are talking about journalists first, we have to remember that, conventionally, we are being played against by a huge po... powerful, god, control my vocabulary so that i don't have the word powerful anymore, well resourceful powerful, yes, well, this is zelensky’s vocabulary, by the way, so i ask you to control me so that i don’t use such words again, powerful power, so powerful power, so the so-called russian media, these are simply all propaganda media, this is my... my kremlin squad, which, well, you know, i am for, as they say, out of duty,

i read tas, pity me, and tas, and riyaanoviny, and there are leading telegram channels, and voynkor , where without them, and i must say, the way they destroy zelensky every time is unprecedented, right? uh, that's why, well, to put it mildly, i don't believe him that it was some such cunning plan to use him, as they sometimes say, that they didn't plant him there, they are hungry to tear him into small pieces, moreover, yes, this is a message, and it comes from putin, and they repeat, uh, putin says it more gently, but these are all listed by me, they are in...

i will not help them play in this, but honestly i will not, because it will happen somehow. well , to put it mildly, not in a human way, yes, although, although, i absolutely agree with ms. yanina, and with you, uh, level, well, yes, uh, there are things that are unacceptable in communication with journalists who you can't afford, which are unfortunately surprising, and - well, you can wish for anything, yes, change the environment there, change the communicators, nevertheless, i see

a certain progress here, as it was at the beginning, at least, i am sure that president zelenskyi has already realized, uh, what is it called, the power of the journalistic word and the journalist staff there, and there is no such disdainful attitude as there was, say, in the 19th year, this progress is obvious, uh, with on the other hand, well, what i said, we will now look at tatarov, this small fragment, because it is very revealing, maybe from our tv viewers, not everyone saw, not everyone heard how it all happened, when the president zelenskyy explained to our colleague that the adviser to the head of the president's office oleh tatarov and the head of the sbu, vasyl... malyuk , participated in the elimination of chechens in the capital at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, or rather

tatar in the status of deputy head of the office of the president of ukraine, let's hear it. i didn't want to say it, the united states and everyone knows it, oleg tatar together with vasyl malyuk killed chechens in ukraine, in kyiv, while you were not here, it was not enough to expel, expel. him to be killed by the russians? here, it's simple, i don't know how, to be honest, to comment, well, he has to sit in the office for the rest of his life now the president, if he killed there, he killed someone, and if he killed, then why does the president say it publicly, well, he said that off the record, i said about it, and in communication with journalists, that you put the same questions to me again question, yanina, should the journalist ask about tatarov, about... who sold raspberries there for $300,000, or whether his relatives sold them there, he then

entered uah 56 million in the declaration, he could not explain at first where he got this money from , that is, is it on time, on time, if we think about what let's not put uncomfortable questions to our president, because we will be very similar to the russians, who criticize him in everything, call him a drug addict and generally try to... give ukrainians the idea that he is a bad president, he has no leverage, no professionalism, and in general he runs the country terribly, and in general, let's negotiate. it's all because of him. we have respect for the president, as an option, as for the institutions of the presidency in ukraine. i think each of us understands that this is a democratically elected president, but the president must respond to those requests of society, and this is not there is a request from journalists only to ask about tatarov, this is a request from society, this is an acute

issue, within which there is a person who has not passed the lustration, accordingly, there is a violation of the law. who talked about how the protesters on the maidan are criminals, then representing the ministry of internal affairs, where zakharchenko invited him and then made him a representative speaker on the events on the maidan during the revolution, the second point, cases related to corruption, closed in a strange way regarding him and mr. nikitas, let me remind you, ukrbud and social housing, and tatarov, plus portnov, appeared in these cases. plus tatarov, tatarov defended portnov for a second, friends, he was portnov's lawyer, a close person, one of those close to yanukovych, one of the kremlin's ringleaders, who was portnov, it is difficult to find someone who would have such a memory, the talent

to build anti-ukrainian strategies , how did tatarov do it, so did partnov, so did tatarov just... he was portov's lawyer in cases related to ukraine and state treason , among others. plus, let me remind you that mr. tatarov had petition, defending the side of the attacker on serhii sternenko, tatarov also did this, i remind you, tatarov was the lawyer of the girlfriend or wife, i no longer remember their civil or official relationship, as a result of the attack on serhii sternenko, which... took place after numerous attacks, the attacker was wounded, and he died, and tatarov was the lawyer of this attacker in the sternenko case and defended the side of the criminal. there are a bunch of cases that i think there should be a question about the background of the person currently sitting in the office

of the president and oversees the entire law enforcement system, but... the president talks about the chechens, which, by the way, i don't know why no one discussed this issue with him, usually presidents prepare, understanding what questions will be asked, and about tatarov , it was obvious that it would be staged, not the chechens, but the kadyrivians, the president meant, and we have a lot of representatives of echkeria fighting as part of the armed forces of ukraine voluntarily, coming to defend, help our country, defend, they are among my acquaintances , and believe me, i'm with them spoke they were puzzled by what the president of the country said, that's why, in summing up, regarding tatarov, i have only one reason why zelenskyy defends him so much, and that reason is that, apart from possibly some institutional and professional qualities, which depend on there are a lot of things in the law enforcement

system of our country during all the years of zelenskyi's tenure and not only the full-scale war. in addition to these qualities of debugging, conditionally, debugging the system, as it is explained to zelensky at the ponds and at personal meetings, there is something else that you and i do not know about we know, i think, in a considerable number of folders, which does not allow to remove close people from the law enforcement system with the experience that is currently in the president's team, i think the same applies to ermak, well, these are my guesses, again, i do not pretend to be grateful, will you allow until... i think it would be logical, since the word has been said now to ukrainian journalists, to demand, i won't choose another word, a press conference, not at all, but a briefing by messrs. tatarov and malyuk on this very matter, i would very much like to hear the first

source, i am aware that there is a lot out there things about... they can't talk about, but when it was said at this level, they should have come before the media and removed the subject, that is, to satisfy the curiosity, because it has already been said, and one more note, yes, that's it refers to those people who are not just preparing the president, this is a normal practice all over the world, not a single president, not biden. no there, i don’t know who macron is, he can’t know everything, well, it’s henrieu, yes, there are specially trained people who are preparing for the press conference in different directions, that’s right, but there is another point here, i noted, since this is not the first time that the president touches on this topic at the drg in kyiv at the beginning

of a large-scale war, there are vague doubts lurking about who is from the closest circle of the president, this puts him in consciousness. and in a certain way distorts the real picture of the world, i cannot count myself among those people who know this history very well, but i did not leave kyiv for a single day at the beginning of the aggression, and when i was afraid, there on the 25th-26th , i walked from nivok to the city center, through roadblocks, just to see what was happening in... the capital, well, opportunities, of course, i communicated, er, so, er, as far as i was told, and

also they were not some, well, absolutely left-wing and uninitiated people, large-scale some detachments of the drg, who entered kyiv, especially on the equipment, according to which it was simply necessary to take some, well, extraordinary measures, there was no such thing, but what... there was, unfortunately, there was friendly fire, and there was a lot of fire, and this is a very serious topic, and you know, the more time passes since then, then it is forgotten, there are many tragedies, and then, well, let's say, the same shootout on beresteyskyi, well, it's just that very close to me, and it was all audible, and the next day i did go there, and well, it was there, as far as i know. the relatives of those soldiers who died in the firefight, they turned to the president's office, they wrote letters to the president,

asking that their relatives who died, it was february 26, to have the same status as those who died on the battlefield, well that so that's how this story ended, i... unfortunately, i don't know, i lost this contact, who i was talking to, but this is very important, this is what i would very much like the president to know, but none of the who was in the territorial defense, and oleg simoroz spoke about it, a war veteran who lost his limbs in the donetsk direction, but i will tell you frankly, i wrote to several representatives of teroborona, a high class, that... about this story with the kadyrivites, whom zelenskyi called chechens who were killed by tatarov and the baby according to the president's version, no one saw tatarov with a weapon in his hands, and

he didn't see him without a weapon either, here it would be wrong to equate tatarov with malyuk, i think malyuk deserves more respect than tatarov, however, believe me, this is some kind of bluff, and what, if... there is a secret operation , i would like to hear, but just speak without taking responsibility for my words, well, this is not the position of the president, i really hope that we will really hear the truth, if this is so, it would be great if tatarov came out and people could ask him questions, but unfortunately, they will not do it, otherwise tatarov will have to be released, well, let's check, tataraluk, the journalist is called to attend a briefing on this issue. at least today we testified about it, so it would be desirable if zelenskyi told about those members of his former team who fled abroad, because

we have a whole list, and we specially compiled in the editorial office people who fled abroad, who were members of his team, but some criminal prosecutions, incomprehensible figures of some cases of embezzlement of money, all of them ended up with... abroad, the former head of the state property fund, dmytro synychenko, the former head of the national bank, kyrylo shevchenko, not to mention yevgeny murayev, natalia korolevska, these are not members of zelensky's team, but they are all fled abroad, i.e. yefremov, trubitsyn, dmytruk, the last one who escaped, andriy portnov, yaroslav dubnevich, oleksandr tupytskyi, bogalyubov, aristovych, kholodov. that is , the number of these people who went abroad, because, in principle, the border is closed for most of those men who are here in

these photos that you see on... on the screen, because they are all military ized, but they are all sitting abroad, and we do not have answers to the question of why this is happening, just as we do not have answers regarding dmytrouk, what there is a whole big system that helps people go abroad, and the fact that it has already acquired such a large scale, industrial scale, i would say so, within the borders of the state, it is absolutely obvious, but we do not have the answer to these questions, and it is obvious we will get them someday, but already... definitely not in this program, and obviously in the next press conference of president zelensky, i have to thank yenina sokolova and olga musafirova, thank you for participating in the program, it was interesting, there was not enough time, i want to talk more, come again, we'll be there for you wait on our tv broadcast. i will remind our tv viewers that during the entire broadcast we conducted a survey and asked you, friends, whether you are satisfied with the communication of the president, the president of ukraine with

society in... so, let's look at the results of the television survey, yes 6%, no, 94% . i hope that the office of the president of ukraine, which monitors the information space, will take these figures into account, they are accurate, well , at least on our channel we monitor it so that they are representative, so in principle we are waiting for a reaction. thank you, it was verdict program with serhiy rudenko, goodbye. now i have a toothpaste that does more, lakad active plus with a plus of active ingredients, i use it to overcome problems with teeth and bad smell, lakad active plus with two-phase technology, actively overcomes bleeding gums and gives fresh

breath. lacalot active plus. which you feel right away, there are 15% discounts on decateln until independence day in the pharmacies of psyllanyk, bam and oskad. read in the august issue of zhuranaukrain. how maidan and the volunteer movement formed a new ukrainian identity. the phenomenon of ukrainian stability. why did the enemy underestimate the power of freedom? from the gray zone to the european stronghold, what lesson did ukraine teach the world? ask at the points of sale. press or subscribe online. the country is in the center of the main events. tingling, numbness or crawling of ants in the limbs arise spontaneously and worry you. a special complex of active substances, dolgit antineuro, helps to normalize the functioning of the nervous system. dolgit antineuro helps to return to usual activities without tingling and numbness in the limbs. dolheid capsules antineuro - help for your nervous system.

there are discounts until the day of independence for ta'. 10% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. there are discounts until independence day on estezifin, 25% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. oh, i remember, you see, although they say that our memory weakens with age, but i am attentive and remember everything. we take the memo effect from dr. tice and feel the difference. the active substances of memo effect improve the functioning of the nervous system and contribute to the normalization of mental activity. memo effect by dr. tyce improves memory and attention, helps to think. fm: galicia. listen to yours. few lions have overcome allergies. cetrilev neo protects against the most common

allergens. there are discounts until independence day on bionorm detox 10% in pharmacies psylansky, bam and oskad. national tv on megogo is a lot of channels, well, a lot of channels, as well as movies, cartoons, series and favorite shows. turn on mego on various devices without unnecessary wires and antennas. and all this from uah 49 per month. congratulations, for some time now it has been possible to observe that russian propagandists, when they talk about strikes on civilian ukrainian infrastructure, or simply on the civilian ukrainian population, then...