a good phrase that money made him stupid, that is, material things ceased to have any meaning for him, he obviously decided to go down in history, but i am interested in your opinion on how to stop him, and therefore the whole of russia, and whether there is, whether this understanding reaches world leaders, this individual, as the late kozlovsky prisoner and writer said, he said that this is more of an infernal personality now, what putin is. of course, i cannot speak neutrally about putin, i say evil, i say it as revenge, a reasonable person cannot himself in these circumstances, to which he led the country to proceed, i think that in 25 years he created the most unsuccessful project for russia, how to destroy such a country as russia, and i am convinced of this that... one of the formats of victory

in today's war is not only about how to reach the mykhailivskyi farm with ukrainian troops and stop there, it 's not about that, if we leave the evil called putin, and with him putin's russia, fascist russia, where putin is fed as the energy of 145 million small. putin's and that the beginning of the source of putinism. this is the blessing they give. yes, if we stop at mykhaylovsky hut, it will be a big mistake. i don't mean that we should physically remind of the green wedge, the crimson wedge, the yellow wedge, the gray wedge, the ukrainian taganrog, the ukrainian bilhorod, the ukrainian. kuban, well

, in one word, i wanted to name a whole series of extreme territories, where the ukrainian presence, it is centuries-old, centuries-old, we are not talking about this now, we are not talking about this dimension geography, we are talking now, if europe, if the world does not understand that there can be no victory under which putin's regime. it remains that there is no negotiation process, when president putin is sitting in one of the chairs, this is the first sign that you have lost, that you are giving some way to feed this mess, you do not need it, i am talking about the portuguese or the germans or the french , you don't need him, he will pick you up tomorrow. in what form? let

's not guess now, i just want to say one thing that today, if you don't solved the topic of security, you have not solved any of the issues that are on your agenda, security is such a thing that knows no borders, regardless of whether you are 600 km or 10 00 or 15 km away, and therefore obvious to himself. today, a big task is how to correctly formulate the definitions of exiting the war brought by putin. i only want to emphasize one thing, so as not, no, no, there, not to give rise to any prejudicial discussion, the presence of putin at any conference, the presence of the need for putin's signature on behalf of the people's prison.

does not give the answer to our victory, it should not be left for tomorrow, and then we quietly approach the thoughts, which i think are very undervalued in today's world, i fear, or i am wary of the syndrome that we experienced in the 90s , when the president of the united states arrives from the podium. parliament says in 1993 that you ukrainians do not dare to create sovereignty, and george bush, from whom everyone expected support, absolutely, on the streets of kyiv for three months there have been many thousands of rallies for independence, the president of the largest democratic state is coming, he says: you wouldn't think of doing that, you wouldn't think of me... and

i'm sorry that he stopped by in my way to kyiv then after moscow or to moscow, well, in any case, it was a visit by road, i know that the speech he gave in... the verkhovna rada on the way from the airport to leonid makarovich, well , he gave either theses or verbally what he wanted to say, as if he agreed with leonid makarovich, as the chairman of the verkhovna rada, well in a word, i have a heavy feeling that today the world has stopped and european including at the crossroads if tomorrow after completion. we see this war in the bosom of russia, in the russian model, in its presence on this political field, i think that we are making a huge mistake,

a huge mistake, we are taking the time-out that putin needs most today, so that later come to the borders of poland. of slovakia, bulgaria, and continues to do the evil thing for which he saw the russian mission, when, you know, on the same question, where is the end of russia, where, where are its borders, from peter the first, we hear such a historical hymn that russia's borders are where its interests end. good formulation, then putin's formulation of the 2000s, well, to be more precise, it was in 2006, at one of the language conferences expressed by his wife, reports that

were written in the kremlin, and she voiced the position of the kremlin. russia ends there, guys, where the russian language ends. the last three months. putin conducts an optional historical duty course and there he asks a seven- or eight-year-old boy where the border is russia is coming to an end and that guy is trying to remember geography, to name something correctly, where are the borders, and he approaches him like this, pats him on the head, and if... saves him from this impasse and gives advice to the drunken russian nation, fills in, russia has no borders, how are you going with this philosophy, it’s not a joke, well, as the president, the president of the country comes out, every word, it’s

official, and he says that his state, which occupies one eighth of is currently fighting maybe 10 wars. maybe even more, well , count how many wars there are in africa, count africa, count the caucasus, count eastern europe, and this is a country, a member of the united nations, the highest security organization in the world, chaired the security council, a member, a permanent member of the security council, this is a country, an aggressor, this is a country where its the leader is recognized as an international criminal, at every step. in europe , a criminal is wanted for photos, putin and so on and so on, and we live in such a world, this is a country that has not even been formally accepted as a member of the united nations. listen, wonder-wonder what it is

for the world so, what i'm getting at is that no one can use the answer with such a russia. today, to sit down with him for negotiations, this... means he will repeat munich in 1938, do you remember when chamberlain flew in, waved one sheet of paper and said, i brought you a measure while you were walking, i worked diplomatically, excellent, i the mir brought, you know, he spoke there in france, and now we are standing, listen, we need red lines, we need to listen to what this executioner of nations, prisons of nations, so to speak, warns. this is a territory where more than 100 indigenous peoples are under the cover of colonialism lives where someone's native language dies every two years, listen, we

are actually in a terrible world, and that's why, when in europe they try to form some kind of tolerance, that it is possible to make a deal with this evil for a few years at all. this is a very wrong policy, on the other hand, ukraine gives you an example of how to fight for your sovereignty and independence. how is it really possible to be an armored car of europe, in other words, how is it possible to enter the territory of the aggressor's country and force putin with trembling hands to read something out of a piece of paper, having gathered your generals and not knowing what to do, it turns out that it was possible, here again, they do not understand what it will all lead to, but we understand that ukraine sometimes shows, just such an example to your words about the fact that europe does not know what to do with putin, but at one time... alexander the great defeated hamel in battle and showed what could be done with the persian empire by destroying

an army that was ten times larger, half of which failed to destroy the world of empires , but the world of empires collapsed after 100 years after napoleon, that is, without taking a certain step now, we will simply delay it in time, then there may be, absolutely, paragraph number one: do not look for a partner in putin, he will never be, he is a speculator who will use today's historical position in order to tomorrow... knocking at your door and so be wiser, although it is more difficult to do, certainly the things that we say that the answer, how to democratize russia, i do not find it in the answer that there will come one ideal democratic power that will now support 144 millions of russians, i'll take this as a conventional figure. there is no such force and never will be, in

the dictatorship regime this force feeds putin, his government and his junta very well. the problem of russia, by the way, is not only possible for russia. putin's evil triumphs not least because of what is happening in russia. so many, and it is so strong, what we call evil, i think, in the formula of putin's existence, the strongest point is that in russia there are the most indifferent, and the indifferent, they automatically close with evil, and it, and it triumphs , and it's because of indifference, you know when you... "when you

go out on the tver boulevard and stand like that near the monument to the ukrainian prince dolgoruky, you will be arrested, when today we are talking about a world that is informational, where billions of megabytes of memory are exchanged instantaneously, more than 1 thousand in the prisons of russia, several thousand political prisoners of all levels, local and up to the highest, this is a country that lives among us, how are you going to arrange your future with such inhumans, in general, do you not feel the danger with this indifference that exists in russia , which was brought up as a political well, not a single state institution works there. here, there is no parliament, neither the upper house, nor the lower house, this is a printer that

will issue you any regulations by the evening, any, start a new war, in 15 minutes the document is already signed by putin, any evil, it will be so scaled that in the community, political, or within the country, or in europe. or in the world, there is no way to stop it, sooner or later we want to come to terms that such a political system with such a leadership that exists today in russia, the world does not have a green light for its existence, no, sooner or later, rather at the most inconvenient time, there will be a knock on your door and they will say that... you fell asleep two years ago, 3 years ago, evil, that you fell asleep, what

you did not decide and acted inadequately, now it is knocking on your door, and you are poles, or you are germans, or you are french, you will give the answer that you did not give 5 years ago, in fact, the awakening of the world is , obviously, if you, if you remember in the 22nd year, how 16 hours at'. french president macron spoke with putin, it's just a miracle, this is one of the leaders of europe, it sounds like a criminal who started a new world war. well, what are you asking him for, what are you begging him for? well, at the beginning of the conversation, put it, put it, well, a healthy analysis, will he let go of the territories he occupied after your call? no, will his plan to escalate new territories change? no, what is the purpose of your

calls, are the elections taking place. chancellor scholz and in one of the interviews, the first interviews, he says: "that germany will not give to ukraine." the question seemed to be: what about germany? will give to ukraine? no, the question was, what will germany give to ukraine? so katzler began by devoting 2/3 of his speech to the fact that germany won't give it, it won't give it, it won't give it, it won't give it, it's gone, yes, and what it will give no? at the end of the video he says: germany will give 500 helmets and 25 field bags with a red cross. yes, that's exactly how it was. listen now, ah, chancellor scholz. he tears putin, and even on a human level, without any patience. he uses

the deepest characteristics of the system. actions, gestures, listen to the e-e of the french president today macron. as a person after all, all, how to say, these scenarios, how to modernize the world, how to learn to respond to the disaster that russia brings, come to the concept of a new security and defense policy of europe, along with nato, when... the president of the united states of america said that the europeans should rethink their attitude to the formation of nato resources. in parallel, europe is coming to the point that, along with nato, you must have your own original project that provides an answer to the rapid security of europe. it goes to ukraine, there

one of the very interesting places is allocated, and where, by the way, the commission and... of the european union is currently working on the first security project of europe, and the second commission is how to respond to the challenges that china and the united states of america are bringing to the european economic market. in this way, i conclude that today we are witnessing a rethinking of many established relations, and perhaps russia during the 25 years of putin's reign. has reached the lowest point of disrespect for itself and for the politics it forms. i definitely can to testify that you will not find russia in the first row of countries that shape the politics of europe or the world. i think they are, she is not in the second one either.

we won't call this, you know, a water bottle. leaders of other countries and no more, and no more, just the dependent colonial state that it is today, and with those unique opportunities, more than 40% of the world's wealth and resources are concentrated in russia, i have two blitz questions, and one a little broader, so that we we had time, because here we are talking about ukraine and its prospects, blitz questions, well, you know, you need to dispel myths, separate ones, don’t ask, i won’t ask about me... but weapons, because those documents were not signed in your time, but many people say so, well, this is a common story that it was necessary to push in 2008 at the nato summit, and we would have been accepted into nato, then a number of countries gained membership there, there was expansion, and if very briefly, why then, i understand that it

did not depend on ukraine there, we remember putin, on the other hand, his words. we remember that ukraine is not even a state, but why then, or what did they say, here's what they said to you, that is, you won't be able to catch the conditional chancellor of the federal republic of germany or someone else to say, well, come on, and how did they argue, as if, well, they don't threaten you, well what do you want, well, let's start from 1994, the 1994 memorandum, which i believe... from the point of view of the mission for the world, ukraine with its step put the last point in the end of the cold war, or as it is called the third. war, i think that the leadership of ukraine at that time had extremely high respect for the mission of guaranteeing security

of ukraine within the framework of the signed document. there are two direct points in the document that... testify to the creation of a full guarantee of your territorial integrity and political sovereignty, and under this document is the signature of the president of the united states, the president of france, britain, the chairman of the people's assembly of china, one might say, the entire nuclear club, from the position of 1994, one can read that listen, there is no such document, such weight. no country in the world, except for ukraine, why in this way, because now it is possible to analyze,

so analytically already, and what, and why tactical the weapons were not brought out, there were arrears, were they not limited to carriers and so on, why did ukraine act the way it did and sign this... memorandum, my short answer: we were one on one then, we were not supported by russia, obviously, in the sense that ukraine would like to see the toolkit for the formation of ukrainian security, we were not supported by the united states, because the common task, the third nuclear arsenal, and it must be dismantled, and it was combined... the united states and russia, and this made it possible to connect the other three members of the nuclear club of the world, and when it was necessary to form even a constitutional period

of relations, whether in the 14th year or in the 22nd year, we very difficultly managed to form a round table of consultations with our guarantors, and to this day, by the way, these five and not... sat down at the table, well five, not five, but the four never sat down at the table, and this, in my opinion, made for the security of the security policy of the world, a very unpleasant fact of history, i don't i know how the world will speak, for example, to the north korean leadership regarding nuclear disarmament. when the time comes, or with iran, or with iran, or with pakistan, or with three more countries, about which it is already possible to say today that the fact is most likely that

they possess nuclear fission, how does one say with them, what is the argument, nuclear the world, the nuclear club will lead them when there is an example of ukraine, which sincerely...openly accepted the proposals of the nuclear club and suffered, by the way, a question, this war, speaking, in your opinion, there is an agreement today, i do not know which level or on which channels that it will not be completed in any case with the use of nuclear weapons, it is this war that russia has unleashed, well, at least now ukraine is directly participating in it as an opponent of the aggressor, assessment of the risk of a nuclear conflict. the temperature of the nuclear factor is cooling, cooling, cooling, and the world is increasingly coming to understand that, in fact, the first

sign of the death of putin, putin is a sign of his use of anything from the nuclear arsenal, this is a war with the whole world, this is his personal death and the end of this war, and today about these the red lines already somehow and not everyone understands where they pass and that is, actually at the end , to put such a final point and already, because there are still many questions, unfortunately, there is no time, the formula of taras hryhorovych, whom you have repeatedly mentioned, today to fight to fight - this is a really working formula, and obviously, this is what ukrainians should wish for today, it is definitely the most important part for the ukrainian part. the answers to our victory is the understanding that our power is in our hands, this is the first thing, and this power is formed by the national spirit. not an ak-47, no

p-300, not anything, if you have an indomitable spirit, you are carriers, authors of victory. viktor andiyovychko was with us, the president of ukraine. thank you for being with us, listening, stay tuned, see you soon. read the august issue of ukraine magazine. how maidan and the volunteer movement formed a new ukrainian identity. the phenomenon of ukrainian stability. why did the enemy underestimate the power of freedom? from the gray zone to the european stronghold. what lesson did ukraine teach the world?

ask. at press outlets or pre-pay online. the country is in the center main events the book women at war is a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the spirit and letter publishing house. the book is based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the military. women at war, search in bookstores of ukraine. with the support of the konstantin zhivago charitable foundation. in september, there are discounts on amiksyn ic. 10% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. ukraine-albania only on meego. conclusions after euro are made. now it's time for the nations league where we need to win every match. cheer on september 7 at 9:45 p.m.,

exclusively on meego. every week, maria gurska meets with the head of the committee on foreign affairs of the polish sejm , the representative of the polish government for the restoration of ukraine, pawel koval. as always, we talk about the most important things that happened this week in poland, ukraine, and europe. what is being said about ukraine in the eu, how should we perceive the statements of european politicians and what will our accession to the eu look like. in the project close to politics, close to the world with maria gurska. every sunday at 15.30 with a repeat at 22:00 in collaboration with seestre eu. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals. russia is already on the verge of running out of resources. topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory, what is it? analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can

the russians do? are they able to use, say, there the resources of the lukashenka army allied with them? vitaly portnikov and the guests of the project, read the entire text, accept my singing, i thank you, it was difficult, but i was just interested, but it was absolutely not, they help to understand the present and predict the future, they offered the united states to conclude bilateral security with us an agreement, a project for those who care and think politclub every sunday at 20:00 on espress. 13-year-old nikita diyachenko, 15-year-old bohdan fabrychny and 16-year-old mark bakharev. all these guys disappeared in time of a full-scale war on the territory of the temporarily occupied luhansk region, and where they are now is unknown. but i really hope so. that with

your help the children will be able to find. first of all, i am addressing the residents of luhansk region. i know that not everyone has the opportunity to watch ukrainian tv channels, and maybe someone sees this program on social networks. please look closely at the children's faces. nikita diyachenko. in this photo, he is younger than his 13 years, but i hope this will not prevent him from being recognized. nikita has an oval face, dark hair and kariu. bohdan factory, he is now 15, the boy is thin, has dark hair and light eyes, and this is mark bakharev, he is 16, the boy has straight dark brown hair and an oval face. information about the disappearance of all these children came on the first day of the full-scale war.