can judge if our colleagues who are engaged in the investigation got their hands on something incredible, you know it perfectly well, and here on any other channel. the first thing they're going to do is they're going to meet with lawyers to properly file that information to defend against a possible lawsuit against specific people, against specific organizations. and next to us there is a boz, which can say anything about anyone, and there will be no responsibility for it, it cannot be. because this is the end of civilization, you know, not only of ukraine, it means that the liar will always win, freedom of speech is not freedom to lie, i say this all the time, i am saying that the bbc standards are completely wrong, when you give two positions, one of which is true and the other is a lie, you can give two different interpretation of one fact, but you cannot force a person to discuss with this person who is simply from...

tobresh, do you remember how it was with the story of the downing of the malaysian plane by a russian missile, so it was necessary to present two positions, one position was ukrainian, dutch, that it was a russian missile, and here some russian official, who was quoted, said that it was actually a ukrainian plane that shot down this plane, although there was no ukrainian plane in the sky, nothing at all related to ukraine, in this track but they talked about it, they lied, but at least they were officials, there was some press secretary of sechin, lyons, he just said it with his lips, and we already knew that it was a lie, and that even if this lie corresponds by the bbc's standards, it doesn't actually meet any standards of decency, just an ordinary lying scumbag who hypes up the deaths of innocent people, and now he will imagine that this guy from lyons or someone else...

a russian propagandist will create an anonymous channel, why would he create it, he probably created it a long time ago, and will report all this, all this information, yes, as if he is not a russian propagandist, but a ukrainian official, how can he protect himself from this? well, if telegram or twitter allows it, if after elon musk bought twitter, there are verified users who were socially with... significant persons, these blue verification ticks disappeared, remember, right? ugh, ugh, and this extravagant billionaire started trading these ticks, so now any person who is a nobody can buy this verification mark and spread misinformation under this verification mark, well i always thought that this verification mark, when it was there in my profile, it means that... i am, i am

a ukrainian journalist, i am responsible for my words, twitter confirms that i am a ukrainian journalist so that people know that they read a real person, now i don't have any verification mark, because that's what this crazy buyer of twitter wanted, who, as we know, now bought it with the money of people close to russian oligarchs, they lent him money, peter's son avina lent him money, avina himself, as you know, is close to putin, here is the whole story for you, but he did not give the fool as if it were money, alisha rusmanov, a person close to putin, so this is really true political madness, not a medical diagnosis, but political diagnosis, and it is necessary to simply return to common sense.

not only the ukrainian verkhovna rada, the ukrainian verkhovna rada among other parliaments of the civilized countries of the world. protection of freedom of speech is protection of freedom of truth. again, i will repeat, i have not finished this thought. cnn and fox news may have completely different interpretations of the storming of the capitols. and this is absolutely logical in a situation where there are different television or media platforms. but neither cnn nor fox news will hide from their viewers. of the storming of the capitol itself, and russian television, let's say that it hides the facts from those who watch it, and that's what the anonymous telegram channels do, they hide the facts and they make up the facts, and that's how they plunge people into total darkness, into an abyss from which there will never be a way out , and when you and i read such channels, we are professional journalists, we know how to analyze information, we understand... how anonymous

information differs from verified information, we may even be interested, yes, as if we bought tickets with you to some theater, or us led to some mental hospital, and we can look through the glass. what 's going on with her patient, but imagine a normal person with no information skills, this is just normal psycho psychological rape of people, that's all i can tell you, unfortunately, we have what we have, as i say , this applies to both telegram and other social networks, in principle, i think, the verkhovna rada, our people's deputies and the world community in general, and mr. vitaly is right, it is necessary to comprehensively, methodically and comprehensively approach this issue that we have in recent years, it has already grown to incredible proportions,

the issue of disinformation in the world and in ukraine, it has grown to simply unprecedented proportions. there are still other issues, and these issues are being raised again, unfortunately, this is the issue of relations, relations between ukraine and poland, here we have again a topic that relates there, historical contexts, yes, and mr. vitaliy and i have discussed it several times, another scandal , the prime minister of poland, stated that ukraine will not join the european union until it resolves historical issues, so called with ukraine, whether it will settle the historical problems. at the same time, this scandal affected the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, mr.

kuleba, in particular, kuleba also stated that, or rather, he mentioned the vistula operation, this. also one of the infamous pages of the history between ukraine and poland, he reminded that these people were hanged from ukrainian territory, resettled in fact on the territory of the western part of the republic of poland, and many polish politicians, in particular from the right wing, say that kuleba should be banned entry into poland, well, that is, there are such exchanges of statements, but the fact that there is already a level of the prime minister who says that ukraine will not join the european union, this means that we are entering for the next round of these discussions and discussions, perhaps,

including in the context of the upcoming presidential elections, which will take place already in may 2025, i.e. next year, but less than that, this issue is still necessary... it will be somehow to decide, it will be necessary to somehow discuss, and ukraine, of course, that it will be necessary to defend ourselves, but also to talk with poland, to talk with polish colleagues, how to reach some kind of result. er, mr. vitaly, why again, why again the last months, i also remember july, we talked with you, and now it's the end of august again the same thing. here is this situation, why, it would seem now, when it is already clear to poland that ukraine is currently fighting against a russian terrorist, that we understand that this

issue also needs to be resolved somehow, why now, why is it being raised now, and what should we do about it context, at least in the coming months, at least understanding that there will be elections in poland, and this is an issue. will be used, will be, here we will not get anywhere without it, well, first of all, i have to say that we may not do anything in the coming months, because the issue of ukraine's accession to the european union is not an issue of the coming months and the coming years, secondly, i would like to clarify to you that, as far as i understand, polish politicians attacked dmytro koleba, not because he mentioned the vistula operation, but because he called the territories from which ukrainians were evicted ukrainian, however, he misspoke, he meant ukrainian ethnic territories, but again, we call them that... and in poland, the poles do not think that it is ukrainian ethnic, as you understand, and here too it is necessary to realize, especially to people who are there in high diplomatic positions, that in a certain situation you need to be careful with statements, and not to answer, not to mention the vistula operation when

you are asked about the situation with gumming, because these are completely different tracks, each one is important, but diplomacy itself is in principle, and you yourself are like that, it never leads to... satisfactory results, this is also an absolutely obvious thing for me, but i am absolutely not going to throw stones at dmitry koleb, so that it is absolutely obvious to me that his discussion with radoslav sokorski was simply used in order to... raise hype on this topic, it is clear, there is absolutely such an obvious reality, a reality that concerns , first of all, our contacts with neighboring countries, and i talk about this reality all the time i say that if someone thinks that ukraine will be able to join the european union without regulating complex issues with neighboring countries, he is mistaken, i think i have been saying this for many years in a row, and i always give the example of the republic of north macedonia. which initially could not join

nato because it could not settle the issue of its constitutional name with greece, and greece clearly said that as long as macedonia is called macedonia, it will not join any nato or european union. finally, macedonia found the moment maybe we too will one day find this moment when greece was in power with such an unconventional government for greece, i would say very much. the left, even, i would say, the left-wing government of prime minister tsipras, and this government was not so excited about the historical legacy as the traditional greek right-wing and left-wing parties, which always made a career out of history, and this government was able to agree with macedonia that it would be renamed north macedonia, macedonia would remain, but would be northern, and macedonia was able to join... nato, but this is where the problems with the eu started, because when the story with the eu started, neighboring

bulgaria said no, there will be no negotiations until you accept the bulgarian idea of ​​what northern macedonia is, until you accept that bulgarians have always lived there too in this territory, and in general, bulgarians consider macedonians bulgarians, the macedonian language is bulgarian, and this is such a complicated story, bulgaria began to block north macedonia's negotiations on joining the union, and they blocked exactly until the macedonians, who were fed up with it all, voted in the elections for patriotic parties who don't like the fact that north macedonia is called north macedonia, and now greece can also block these negotiations, and the question arises how many years this continues 10, 10 years as macedonia is a candidate for the european union, and what about the negotiations, nothing, how long can it continue, it's another 25, honestly. to the macedonians, that it ended quickly for them, but i do not yet see objective reasons, and that the same fate awaits ukraine, maybe so, and it is

very dangerous, it is true, and it is dangerous not only for our neighbors, but also for us, because i always remind, if we sit like this, in front of the doors of the european union, we will conduct negotiations, our neighbors, whether they are poles, whether they are hungarians, whether they are slovaks, whether they are romanians, will demand from us what we cannot do in order not to disturb our... public opinion, then in the end russian influence will increase here after the war, and the majority of society will say: listen, well, we have been waiting for the european union for 15 years, well we had a war with russia 15 years ago, but we they don't want europe, and russia wants us, then we can join the eurasian union, why would our parents there be such idiots who boasted about this european union, it's better to be with russia, it doesn't put forward any conditions for us, well, if russia will not put forward, of course, but the danger... is enormous, and this must be explained to polish politicians, and hungarian politicians, and

slovak politicians, and romanian politicians, all this will be a problem, and we can already see this from the claims that hungary is exhibiting there, now these are also historical claims on the recognition of transcarpathia as a historically hungarian historical territory, the fact that it will be more difficult with poland than with hungary when it comes to practical issues, i guarantee you that. and here, too, you can't do anything special, as you understand, but we really need to think about it, well, if not today, then tomorrow. how to think? we need to look for mediators. whoah, whoah. mediators there, say, in france, in germany, to create joint commissions, to seek a compromise, to create a joint commission of historians. with the participation, say, polish, ukrainian, french historians, well... for example, that there should be some kind of referee, that countries, other countries, neutral

of the european union offer their version of solving these problems, many such things, many things depend on how much we are able to explain to poland, that there are problems of a national nature, and there are problems of a local nature, because for poland, all relations with ukraine rest on the fact that... and in fact, for the people who live in kharkiv. oblast or poltava region. poland is as different a country as france or belgium. ugh. they have nothing to do with poland. i mean in terms of conflicts, in terms of the past. and it is the poles who cannot understand that what is for them a central political issue is actually a regional issue for them. that people in kyiv and in lviv

look at these polish-ukrainian relations completely differently, that this... for galicia and for volhynia, poland is a great subject of past history, because the territories were part of the polish crown before the war poland, but what to do with the territories that were parted with poland back in those days bohdan khmelnytskyi, have they never been part of poland, just like kharkiv or dnipro or odesa, they have never been to poland, they do not understand at all what polish politicians are talking about, you see, they have... a completely different historical and political heritage context in poland, such frankly pro-russian, maybe former now marginal political forces are also playing along, for example, the same confederation, which you and i also talked about on live broadcasts, it is already gaining 12 to 14% in poland. and they are also hammering it all and it is clear that they will be,

will raise this issue, and the russian forces in poland, which are also disguised. under the polish forces, they will raise this issue in a similar way, so here, as they say, we all, moderate people, people who understand this context on both sides, need to somehow think, somehow come to an agreement, somehow develop a common vision for a common future, and one more topic that i would like to... discuss today, of course, is the press conference of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, it took place this week, the president said, answered journalists' questions about the situation at the front and about the kursk region, it is clear that there were certain pressing questions,

the topic touched upon mr. tatarov, and of course the united states. america about the president's entourage, that is, there was a certain set of issues that society usually discusses today, some positively, some negatively. in general, mr. vitaly, how do you rate this press conference, how do you like the quality of the presentation, the quality of the answers, were you satisfied as a citizen of ukraine with the answers given by the president, and... it is clear, whether you and i, as citizens , are satisfied with the questions that were asked to the president, whether all the questions that concern us today were asked, i do not know, andrei, i proceed from the simple truth of journalism, that the press conference is not news, i didn't watch this press conference, i just watched some theses that the president presented, what was important to me, i noticed there, but i

spent exactly 10 minutes reading these things, i think that things what, what can be. said at the press conference, this is already news there is no, ugh, ugh, that's all, i can't tell you about the quality there, about all of that, i'm not one, you know, i don't remember how many years i've been to any press conference, i haven't been to any press conference ukrainian president, i haven't been since 1994, and because i believe that if people say something to a large number of journalists, it has nothing to do with politics, really, well , it's just my point of view, so i can't tell you answer, and why any questions? and why , even now, even i understand that it is not discussed as much as it probably is it was before a full-scale invasion, of course we're not before a full-scale invasion, i also didn't understand why everyone

was talking about it, but more than that, i still agree with you that now it's probably not ... that important to society , i did not see such a large number of discussions as before the full-scale 2nd, i noticed that the central topic of this entire press conference was that the president answered about the deputy head of his office, it seems tatarova, right? yes, yes, yes, yes, it seems so, well, that's also very strange, because the president has repeatedly shown since 2022 that he is ready to defend his ugh, employees in front of journalists, ugh, ugh, er, er, because i believe that this is part of his political image, his political power, together with that we will not to forget that when the president decides to get rid of one of his closest associates, he is also a journalist. doesn't ask about it and doesn't pay much attention to public opinion, right? that is, he, well, remember that andrii bohdan was the head of his office, i think i already forget these people, bohdan,

yes? yes, yes, here, and this bohdan, it seems, was also criticized no less than oleg tatarov, and the president defended him with the same fervor as oleg tatarov is defended now, and then one fine day he kicked him out of office and no longer mentioned about its existence right? well, well, the same was the case with any other people, even with socially resonant people such as valery zaluzhno, if the president decides to dismiss someone, he is absolutely not interested in what journalists or non-journalists think about it. , if he someone is going to be left in office, he is absolutely not interested in what questions he is asked about this matter, he simply does not notice or is annoyed, because this is, i would say, this is the style of ruling, and he is a composition. ukrainians voted in the presidential and parliamentary elections, this is a model of one-man rule that is based not

so much on the constitution as on opportunities, because when in our conditions of a parliamentary-presidential republic you have a full majority in the parliament, you can ignore the parliament and can transform the government to the department in the president's office, by the way, this is not the first time in ukrainian history, as you remember, it has already happened. and after 2010 it was like that, in principle, you can ignore public opinion, because you have such a huge mandate of 73% support, and i remind you again that this is not the choice of volodymyr zelenskyi, he did not choose himself that way or something seized power through a coup d'état, this is the choice of the ukrainian people, the ukrainian people gravitated towards this, as i said, paternalistic one-person model management, i am not surprised by this either, because the most popular politician among ukrainians for many years, if not ten years , was and will be oleksandr lukashenko. it is absolutely clear that if the conditions are created for such a model of government to emerge in ukraine, it will emerge, i am not surprised by this. but mr. vitaly,

if we are talking about the context of press conferences in general, are they necessary now in the form in which they are, that is, the connection of the president with society through the medium of the media, and if not, and if they are necessary, if we are talking about what they are really necessary, then... still , journalists, in my opinion, have the right to ask similar questions, and probably they want to hear some answers to these questions, of course, but you should not forget that when journalists ask questions in countries, where there is a quick electoral response, let's say there, when journalists come to a briefing in the white house, then the people who meet them know that if they do something wrong, they will be able to answer questions, they will meet not as journalists, but ... as a voter , and when you and i are in a situation when there is no quick answer to such an election, so of course in this situation the very form and substance of the answer is not of great importance,

that's all i wanted to tell you, that is, if even there journalists or society did not like an answer, then in my opinion authorities, this is not a problem for them, and it will not affect anyone. the perception of the government system will not be affected at all, as far as i understand it will be affected, it will not be affected, what does it matter if there are no elections, well , it was affected, and what, we are in the same boat from the government, if the government sinks, we will also sink in the conditions of war, if you sink, then the government will also sink, we are on such a titanic, we need to weave it so that it is not a titanic, but a ship that can overcome a catastrophe, already when we will sail, there it will be possible to talk about some electoral issues, but i don't think that this is a quick story, as you understand. well, yes, here we actually see

that the public's attention, considering the fact that the war is going on in our country, considering the fact that our country is going on daily shelling, daily terrorist acts of russia, we observe that attention. to such measures, it is minimal and not what it is during, at least, election cycles, that is, when the presidential election is expected or the parliamentary election of the country is expected, then of course people pay more attention to what the president says, what the speaker says, more specific period, andrei, well, you understand, a more specific period. in the war, you captured some territory, you captured it, it's a fact, ukrainian troops entered suja, it's a fact,

russian troops ended up in... somewhere there kilometers from pokrovsk, it’s a fact, i’ll destroy it, a russian missile hit somewhere near the territory of the kyiv hydroelectric power station, it’s a fact, you see, you can’t buy a railway ticket, there isn’t one, you can hold 45 press conferences to tell how great the railway works, and then you want to buy a ticket, but there is none, and what will the press conference cost you, these are still concrete facts. this is the difference between a time of crisis and a time when people can comfort themselves with illusions, you know? september discounts on lactial, 20% in pharmacies plantain, bam and savings. fm halychyna.

listen to yours. ukraine-albania - only on megaogo. the conclusions after the euro have been made. now it's time for the league of nations where we need to win every match. cheer on september 7 at 9 p.m. exclusively for the first of september, there are 10% discounts on motorx at psyllanyk, bav and oskad pharmacies. in the hands of a specialist, the medicinal plant belladonna, so dangerous in nature, turns into belastesin. an ally in the fight against spasm. belastezin is a medicine with belladonna extract, for gastritis and sharp pains in the stomach. repeat there are discounts on amixin ic. 10% in pharmacies

plantain, memory and savings. song discounts on reza stol, 10% in psarynsky, bam and oskad pharmacies. every week, maria gurska meets with the head of the committee on foreign affairs of the polish diet, the representative of the polish government for the restoration of ukraine, pawel kowal. as always, we talk about the most important things that happened this week in poland, ukraine, and europe. about ukraine in the eu, how we should perceive the statements of european politicians and what our accession to the eu will look like, in the project close to politics , close to the world with maria gurska, every sunday at 15:30 with a repeat at 22:00 in collaboration with seestre au. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresen had done so, he would have gone to prison. a special view on events in

ukraine, so there is no need. to say that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, and beyond its borders, then who is china, me, my heart hurts, all this in the information marathon with mykola veresny, saturday 5:10 p.m., sunday 6:15 p.m. on espresso. two hours to to learn about the war and what the world lives by. a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. 2 p.m. in ukraine news time on the espresso tv channel. greetings to all the viewers in the iryna koval studio. and we begin our issue with the situation

in kharkiv, because the occupiers. continues to terrorize the city and kharkiv region.