in the jewish settlements in this territory, because now any situation can become really explosive and lead to the opening of new fronts in the middle east, and in principle i do not see now any possibility that it will somehow stop for one simple reason. there are a lot of forces that are interested, but do you remember a month ago, everyone expected an attack from iran on israel like this. all mass media there counted 24 hours 48 hours there monday tuesday wednesday on friday this didn't happen but in your opinion it has already passed well, at least 30 calendar days have passed, why did it happen anyway, and could iran have taken such a position in anticipation in order to strike back, you know, and then i didn't quite understand why everyone was expecting why everyone was expecting a retaliatory strike.

a missile arsenal is needed to strike back. ugh. iran clearly used up its entire missile arsenal in the previous strike against israel. ugh. and to think that he has the same number of missiles in his warehouses, with which he can deliver an adequate blow, it is also somehow very strange. whoah, whoah. well, that's as we expect some blows from russia. and you said at the beginning of our conversation, the kurdish region is the answer. but it's not like that, everything works. russia actually amortized its missiles from warehouses in the first months of the russian-ukrainian war, remember when there were massive bombings every day throughout the territory, remember, these were missiles from warehouses, and now russia can us to bomb exclusively with what it accumulates or what it receives, let's say from iran or north korea, well, it is clear that you do not get a special number of drones in such a situation there, then and north korean missiles are behind them, realistically speaking, well, in such a situation , russia has to be fired with what... it

produces, and in order to paralyze the air defense system, you need a large number of missiles, because if you are every month shoot what you have developed, then you will simply be hit by all the missiles and not a single missile will hit the target and it will all be completely in vain, so russia collects missiles and after that conducts such massive attacks for a couple of days, after which these attacks end until at that moment, until it produces again, assembles again and attacks again, and in principle, if we...were specialists in the military-industrial complex of russia and understood how many rockets russia produces per month and how many it has used to paralyze at least partially the air defense system of ukraine, you and i could draw up a schedule of russian attacks on ukrainian territory for the next five years. frequency, number, combo attack, what should be, should be more drones, should be more. possibilities yes

in this way to divert the attention of air defense, well, the same is iran, but in order to strike israel, it needs to collect a sufficient number of missiles and drones for a combined strike, and i want to draw your attention, andriy, to a larger number than it was, because the number that was already used to strike israel led to the defeat of iran, none of the missiles hit the target, none, so now these... there should be twice as many, relatively speaking, or one and a half, i don't know, again , i'm not an expert on missile strikes, but if i were a specialist, i would tell you exactly what the quantity should be and how long it would take to produce them? i assure you that as soon as israel is defeated and has enough arsenal, it will attack israel. and i'll tell you one more thing, even if there was no killing of ismail haniyeh tehrani, this strike would still have happened as long as the... there were enough missiles,

just like the russian strike happened without any kurdish region after a sufficient number of missiles were found in russia. that's it and there is a formula for war that everyone should be aware of who is in the countries that are conducting military operations during the 20s of this century. mr. vitaly, thank you, thank you to our tv viewers, listeners, viewers on youtube for watching, for being... with us, and i hope we talked, discussed all the most important topics for the current week, mr. vitaly, once again thank you for, thank you, and let's hold on, everything will be ukraine, and we will meet with you next saturday, at the saturday political club, bye.

glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on air tv channel studio zahid will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular , we will try to predict how the kurdish operation of the armed forces of ukraine can affect the stability of the russian regime, but we will not only talk about this. my guests today are roman bezsmertny and andriy pionkovskyi. and now the iconic ukrainian politician and diplomat roman bezsmertny will work on the espresso tv channel. glory to ukraine, roman petrovych, glad to see you. glory to the heroes, sir. well, first of all i would like to ask you how you are you see the strategic directions of the deployment of the situation of the big august-september operation, i.e. what to expect in the coming days in september, we understand that the armed forces of ukraine conducted an extremely successful raid in

the kursk region of the russian federation, this raid is not over, the situation there is very serious, and at the same time the enemy is not stops its attempts to increase the pressure on donetsk region, that is , extremely... great effort is involved both in terms of personnel and equipment, on the other hand, we understand that there is also a dimension of international assessment of what is happening on the battlefield, i would like you to characterize the current moment and try to predict what we can expect in the near future. well, mr. antin, as can be seen from the situation, the silence that followed after august 6 with the start of the operation. whether it will be called kursk in the textbooks or something else, that is a matter for historians and a matter of time, but the delay will pass, and it should be noted that it passed much faster among the partners, and actions began there, and we

can see how it has become actualized now and aid in ukraine, especially, was intensified our closest partners, the baltic states, centrally. european and so on, they are better, faster, more deeply aware and obviously informed about what is happening, well, obviously at the level of leaders they were informed about what the likely prospects are, and secondly, as you can see, there is no delay in the kremlin, because , apart from the reflexive bombing of the 26th, the kremlin still has no tools. opposition to this operation, and the fact that they are babbling, it actually shows that the kremlin does not understand what is happening, for what happens, what are the prospects. in addition to the fact that lukashenko of belarus was frightened and began to bring his forces to the border,

although it must be understood that today the cellars with ammunition stocks are empty, the equipment is almost complete. is located in russia and has already been used on the russian-ukrainian front, but he can do all kinds of subversive things and launch an informational and psychological attack with the appearance there of two or three, maybe even 5,000 personnel with certain armored vehicles. now a few words about with citation about how in there is a reaction on the international level, well , what surprised the world the most is the reflection of donald trump, who in denver, meeting with the national guard association, and this meeting was dedicated to commemorating the fallen

american soldiers during the evacuation of the contingent from afghanistan, well, everyone remembers the shelling then the airport and the fighting at the gate, where 13 soldiers died, and august 31 is the commemoration of the date of the end, the withdrawal of american troops, meeting with the veterans' association at... national guardsmen, trump threw the following phrase: that you see, ukrainians are rushing to russia, you will have the third world war, so he said, not ours, well, it is always typical of politicians to distance themselves from the people, especially such a temperamental one as trump. as for the reaction of the europeans, it is positive, and especially the military... analysts, from the very beginning they did not understand and knew neither

the plan nor the goal, but seeing the speed of the advance and the moderate withdrawal of troops from the east in order to save the situation in the area kursk region, they began to positively evaluate even the zmi they took this quote from trump and those revealed to trump's team on... positive consequences and intentions, as they consider this operation, but the importance is that the majority of serious analysts in the west point to this, that this course of events and this operation in the kursk region the field is multivariate, and this actually puts many in a stupor, and the majority does not understand the plan, does not see the goal. which is not voiced, but in the meantime they look positively at the number

of prisoners of war, at the results of the introduction of hostilities, and even more note that that, but then it can develop in any direction with any consequences. well, part of it says that it is necessary to consider what is happening, let's say, in the eastern, southeastern direction in donbas and what is happening. in the area of ​​the kursk region, and here it is necessary to understand and balance this situation, but from my point of view, what is happening now on the front line, which has expanded and has already reached almost 700 km, shows that the general staff controls the situation, they understand the threat that arises in the donbas area. district pokrovska, they see this threat and

are maneuvering in the area of ​​the kursk region, it is clear that these steps will spread, including in the belgorod region, this is shown by the last days, including the chance of encircling the group there in the range of 3-5 thousand, which fell in the ring in the kursk region, this is written in the west, they write very actively, explaining the possible positive and negative consequences, and the information that appears in ukraine, in particular what was said at the forum of the meeting of the heads of state with mass media at the press conference of the president, regarding the preemptive nature of this strike, regarding the disruption of a possible offensive in the kharkiv region. that is, all this reveals more and more, let's say, thoughts, because i

never, you know, i told you about this, mr. antin, that i don't understand, if steps are taken in it, in these steps two bets are made there for two or three goals, usually when something is done, one goal is defined and you can understand that this will be the result, and as far as i can see, these tasks that are solved are just... tasks to implement the goal, what is the goal is, well, we still need to find out, it will be, and , by the way, they are also actively writing about it, especially british journalists who deal with issues of similar things, military operations, tactical operations, strategic developments and so on, in america the situation is simplified by the fact that that the elections would return the analysis of any... any military operation to the level of election slogans. when we talk about

certain tactical, and perhaps not only tactical moments, these are two settlements on the territory of the russian federation, this is the city of kurchatov, there, where the nuclear power plant is located and the city of kursk, as such, the regional center, so we understand that the military operation is not over yet, on the other hand, we understand that the stakes in such operations always increase, so well... now he is starting to talk about changing his nuclear concept, on the other hand, he immediately invited the magate delegation to visit kurchata, on the other hand. we understand that the kremlin seized two ukrainian nuclear plants at the time, namely the chernobyl nuclear facility and the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, yes, he captured them with battles, well, and accordingly we understand that something is happening, well, maybe it would be possible to implement certain exchange operations, i don’t know how

realistic it is, because conspiracists talk about it out loud there or write in their or others... in tweets, but how do you see the prospect of this? first, all the things that are connected, say, with the tasks that are being solved along the way, to them i include, say, the creation of a fund for the exchange of prisoners of war, then the topic of the exchange of territories, then the topic of the same exchange of nuclear facilities of energy, and at the same time , the fact that this is one of the belts, the kursk region and the territory is one of the belts, where the relevant anti-missile and anti-aircraft defense objects of the former soviet union are located, and these data, which to date appear in a minimal volume about the fact that

underground bunkers have been found there and so on, this is only the beginning of the disclosure... of the big truth, because eventually these things must be made public, eventually they will know about them, because i think that especially the people of frankiv, ternopil, they are in the forests even now may find some wells, the depth of which is impossible to determine, well, these are objects, former objects of the soviet union system, so now we have a situation in which on the territory of belogorodsk, kursk, voronezh. there are a whole complex of these in the bryansk regions, and it is obvious that the situation will develop in the future, and this whining of the moscow führer, and the escape from the topics, from the key problem through the discussion of economic issues, budgetary issues, this is evidence that he was affected personally,

and the whole system, which, which can be... to attribute to what was called the second army of the world there and so on. as you can see, the reflection of chechen units and russian officers is, well, unusual, if only from the point of view of 11 years of war. i'm not talking about the press service of the general staff and so on. that is, something is happening behind the scenes. we, shall we say , evidence, and secondly, pay attention to the mood of the ukrainian military and political leadership, which, even in matters related to the fact that it is necessary to achieve maximum permissions and the removal of restrictions on the use weapons of american, british,

french, and the positive thing that we did not notice before, that is, in fact. it should also be noted that in this situation arguments appeared that were not expected in washington, london, paris, berlin, or brussels. yesterday's meeting of nato ambassadors, and the quick response that nato will increase, is obviously a response to information that, from my perspective, i cannot identify. nature, but i understand that something is happening that cannot be made public for the time being , and a very important thing that is also not you can ignore the quotes thrown by the moscow führer at a meeting in moscow that the strengthening of the economy is a guarantor

of the success of the soviet union, as he said, it actually reads like this: the war is a guarantor of the growth of the russian economy, that is, it was taken there, as in its time by the nazi fuhrer hitler, the course for the complete militarization of russia, this is a very important component, because it means that this is where the threat comes from in 2025, the kindling of war by russia, including with the nato countries, because... for fuhrer moskovsky, ukraine is only part of the war against that evil enemy nato, the united states of america and. so on, and when these things are combined, add here lukashenko's reflection, which, well, it

resembles a game of soldiers, but not participation in the war, especially on the side of the enemy, especially when he realizes the voice, his voice trembles in lukashenka, we understand that in the 25th year he would like to re-appoint himself, for this he consulted with the chinese. they don't want him in moscow, and on the other hand, you very rightly said that our euro-atlantic friends can solve the issue once and not always the so-called suvalk corridor, we understand that this or that provocation may happen, so why not level this bridgehead that russia is trying to use to incite possible aggression against nato countries, against the baltic countries, then why not play against belarus like this ... how, for example, it would fit, yes, especially since according to the podzdam agreements, kaliningrad was supposed to be

returned to its rightful owner in 1986, and the placement of nuclear weapons on the territory of denuclearized belarus, at one time, russia there returned, well, this is a violation of many conventions, well, plus, one or another provocation of the military plan may happen, so what about minsk, so to speak... who guarantees him what? well, here we can say with complete confidence that the argument for lukashenka , the moscow fuhrer , is that the kursk operation can also return to the north, after that to the west, that is, you understand, in fact, the development of events surrounding the situation in the kursk region, he so multi-component, multi-variant, and approaches to its implementation. that we are not alone sometime we will see the wet pants of both lukashenka and putin. another thing is that certain decisions are very important in this situation, which must be

implemented in washington, brussels, london, paris and berlin. and if all this converges, and for this there are those arguments that were obtained during the kurdish operation, then it means that it is possible to... talk about a certain turning point in the development of events, but i say again, for this it is very important to understand that neither the elections in the united states of america, nor any winds in europe, but failed to break not just plans, i am not talking about plans here, here we are talking about the persistence of ukraine's position, to save europe and the world from deployment. war, because once again i want to return everyone to what the führer said at the meeting: he is preparing to ignite the fires of war in other places, it can be felt in

the rhetoric, he sees the failure of the situation in ukraine, he cannot understand and allow himself to accept the fact that he is so strong, but he cannot cope with the situation that is developing, so much so that... in ukraine, the president says during a briefing: well, maybe who is there, we'll see who will be there after putin, with whom it will be necessary to negotiate. why did putin go to the north caucasus at the time of the kurdish operation? we understand that the troops that are used there are, first of all, his de facto labor guard, which should ensure one or another stabilization scenario, that is, we understand that there is no such reserve there. army, first, he runs away from problems, and that too, a signal, in fact, it is in the style of the kgb,

the fsb, in general, the tactics of the kgb, the fsb are short diversionary actions, as soon as he gets into the situation that he faced during the offensive of the ukrainian armed forces, he will run away from problems, he fled first to beslan, then to baku. well, at least there was an answer, because it was necessary to ensure the transportation of the shaheds across the caspian, in this regard baku plays a key role, that is why he convinced aliyev not to interfere, plus it was necessary to complete the agreement on azerbaijan joining brics, or in kazan, at all the brics forum will take place soon, and so on, that is, at least there you can find words to cover your own escape from issues, but his unintelligible phrases in beslan with the women victims of the beslan

tragedy. testified that he was not ready, as well as the limited information on azerbaijan, i am not talking about the fact that he met with durov in order for durov to warn him that he would probably be detained, and therefore the telegrams should to clear from the special service the information contained there, because it could fall into the hands of a potential enemy of russia, all this information... detailed analysis, analysis of the situation, and now it becomes clear that in the talks in tehran, which shoigu led at the time, were not aimed at stopping iran's reflection against israel, but at agreeing on additional missiles and missiles, remember, then everyone in the world answered, and what missiles, which missiles, now it turns out that the situation is developing in such

a way that... there are those who need not only shaheds, including missiles, various systems, and all this indicates that, well, as in the famous fairy tale, or not it so happened that during the kurdish operation, well, if they did not find kashcheev's needle, then they found a duck or a goose, in in which is the egg, in which is the needle, but something is happening. what, well, i can’t even explain how radically the tonality has changed, and this tonality has changed both in the kremlin and in europe, and trump’s reflexive return to the rhetoric that he is now not in 24 hours, but in a month , it will solve the problems of the whole world, it also shows that there are some things

that are very strong. seriously influenced the course of events, but specifically roman petrovych, the potential of the situation, which would have a perspective to be reflected in the so-called second peace summit, so we understand that there are no grounds for saying that it will be more successful than the first, but there was a story that russia or russian representatives could, could, i emphasize, be at it present, we also understand from the other side that there was also a story that putin was... ready for some kind of negotiations, but he wants to take over 30% of ukrainian territories, and we, of course, will not go for it, and it is unlikely our overseas and european allies will agree to this, but, as you said, there are also so-called levers in this story, and one of them is in kursk oblast, maybe he is not the only one, it is important that the first reaction was sluggish,

halmonut’s reaction of the führer was as follows: ukraine raises the stakes for negotiations, yes? yes. where does that reaction come from? i had to be at the negotiations with the russians, and at one time the osce made a schedule where before the start of each round of negotiations, they very actively attacked and shelled ukraine. in this way , they created, if the compulsion to certain actions, not understanding that from the ukrainian side... there are people walking around who are spitting on how many times they are smacking around, but they did it. this reaction of the führer shows that he has fallen into a trap, because it is clear that he was given certain steps and certain steps were taken, and these steps missed the piece with the kurdish operation, and therefore he could not say anything else, as he appeared, he said yes, i

was driven because... coercion to force, to peace, coercion to peace, to negotiations, this is not the ukrainian way, this is the way, the way of the führer, and pay attention, he reflects based on that everyone is like us, like them, like russians, this is evidence that he got into something, now the results, and i would like to draw your attention and our viewers to the smile on the face of the ukrainian. when he was asked about the next peace summit round of negotiations, whether or not he was, he smiled and said, yes, online, and put an end to that , that's great, and he did it with a smile, like, well, what, , that is, everything that happens around qatar, now saudi arabia, united arab emirates...