it does not allow this to be done, at least because none of such persons, if we even now hypothetically named them, are not ready to go to ministerial positions, and then we see that the reserve bench in the office of the president, in the current government, it is not just short, but it is empty, but empty, empty places that no one is ready to come to, because they understand that decisions are not made in the government, but go to people who have a serious reputation, who have a serious name , which... have connections, competences, etc., in a situation where they will bear responsibility for other people's mistakes, and they themselves will not be able to realize what would correspond to their level of ambition, then it is clear that they will not do it, therefore the problem here is not the formation of a unity government, but the problem that reinstitutionalization needs to be carried out, it is necessary to figure out what the institutional balance and institutional responsibility should look like in the conditions of war while preserving the democratic. on

the agenda and democratic practices, but in conditions where a number of functions are centralized in one way or another, because to return to the pre-war we cannot change the situation, it was not ideal, firstly, and secondly, it is simply ineffective in the conditions of war, and the conditions of a short war, when all the power was concentrated in the hands, the role of the parliament, government, etc. was not elected, it also itself exhausted, this model does not go any further, accordingly we need a third one, i would call it rationalization. and now there are changes in the government, they will show whether they are trying to carry out cosmetic changes and simply replace the surname, but not fundamentally change the model of relations between the government and other branches authorities, or maybe they will go to reboot the system itself, and then the surname will only be derivative. well, one more topic of personnel, which is relevant today, which sounds, is the dismissal of volodymyr kudrytskyi from his post.

the head of the ukrenergo company, the supervisory board on monday voted for the dismissal of kudrytskyi, the director of the energy research center, oleksandr kharchenko, expressed surprise at the dismissal of kudrytskyi. he considers this decision illogical. let's listen to what kharchenko said. at least, no argument was publicly given as to why at all this process is taking place, and it is very difficult to assess it, what it is based on in principle. as for... how i assess the activity of the head of ukrenergo, i assess it very positively, what i saw, his leadership in joining the european energy grids, his leadership in the construction of physical protection, what the company did in order to to collect the maximum resources for the restoration of energy in a permanent mode, the 15 billion dollars provided by ukrenergo's partners, which is three times more than the entire other industry has collected. 500 million, this is for

me, well, clear indicators of a person's effectiveness. no one is perfect, but show me who in ukrainian energy did more during the war for ukrainian energy. unfortunately, i do not see such a person. by the way, after the dismissal of kudretskyi, the head of the supervisory board of ukrenergo, danielel dobeny , and its member peder anderson submitted applications for the early termination of their powers, and they say that there... was political pressure, so how should we perceive these events in general in the conditions of wartime and in the conditions of war , there are personnel rotations that do not have er , there are only explanations, motivated explanations, the opinion, the supreme commander-in-chief's position, but the question is, in wartime, the supreme commander-in-chief's position is the body that... decides whether

kudrytsky or another official there will be the head of the company or not? obviously not, it is difficult for me to assess the effectiveness of kolorivskyi's work, because i do not have expertise in the field of energy, and accordingly i cannot say whether he was a high-quality or low-quality manager. the only thing i can confirm is that we did not see him among the key figures scandals, this is already an achievement in ukrainian realities, secondly, there is the position of the expert environment. profile, which for sure, which definitely do not support the fact that he is part of evil, that is, at least we see that even in the expert environment there are no bright claims to him, for sure all the key problems that currently exist were not associated with him, that is , at least we can say that he was definitely not the worst manager, further there can be debates and evaluations from specialized specialists who can indicate what were the weak points, what are the strengths and ultimately on balance. what

we have at the end, but from the point of view of the very removal of mr. kodrytskyi, the problem here is not even the competences, but the problem in the procedure and what was obviously being pushed now and... dismissal and it was a political decision that contradicts the nature of the reforms, which were carried out from the point of view of the corporatization of the sector and independent management and the obligations that ukraine undertook to our western partners within the framework of, in particular, the unification of the energy grid, therefore it causes serious concerns, and the fact that now two of the board members, in particular the chairman of the board, who are among the independent foreign...partners appointed to the board, are leaving, and they are leaving clearly stating that they do not agree with such a decision and consider it wrong, of course, this is scandalous and image-wise for ukraine, it will be extremely bad now , it can seriously undermine our reputation, and for the authorities it will be a challenge in communications with

our partners, and for society, at the moment , such withdrawal is not explained, it is not, does not have an unambiguous positive assessment from the side. let's say the expert environment, so that the society believes them, and it is clear from the authorities that there is a certain skepticism about the decisions of the authorities in society, accordingly, it will be perceived negatively, therefore, in the dry balance, we have dubious compliance with the procedure for its removal and have a low level of trust in such the decision was made because of the scandalousness of the government's personnel policy in general, therefore without clarification, without explanation, without understanding who is being replaced and under what tasks. this is just another situation that will add to the series scandalous personnel changes. will this now lead to some kind of political crisis, a serious crisis in relations with partners, i think not, it will simply be another blow that undermines trust both within our state, between

societies and the authorities, and between the authorities and our partners, but we still have such blows we can withstand it, there is still a certain margin of safety, and unfortunately, it will be abused, because the war, after all,... actualizes slightly different challenges and creates a certain threshold of strangeness and, in particular, elements of self-censorship, which are applied both by society and our partners, and on some things, gritting their teeth, but nevertheless ready to close their eyes, but the war is also not an excuse that we make some decisions without any explanations, without any communication with society, after all, ukrainians participate in the war , and they fight for... for their freedom and independence, including the right to know or the right to understand what is happening in the country. this is an abuse of trust, and it cannot last for a long time, accordingly, in what situation it can break, and every time it is a probing of the limit of what is permissible. it is obvious that with ukrenergo's situation is not so

clear to the public that this would be the last straw in distrust of personnel policy, but it is clear that the government is burning with such a step. part of their resource and capital, which will end at a certain moment, and society will not be ready to turn a blind eye to everything. thank you, mr. oleg, it was oleg sahakyan, political scientist, co-founder of the national platform for stability and cohesion. friends, we continue to work live on the espresso tv channel and continue to conduct the survey that we are asking you today. the question is: do you support renaming the penny to chess? well , it means the proposal of the national bank to call small money in... a shag, the historical name of this small coin, and instead of a kopeck, which comes from the russians, so yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube if you have a separate opinion , please write in the comments, if you watch us on tv or on other

television platforms, then please take a smartphone or phone and vote by phone 0800 211 381, if you support. renaming a penny to a chess no 0 800 211 382. then we are in touch with yevhen magda, executive director of the institute of world politics, mr. yevhen, i congratulate you and i am glad that you are with us today, congratulations, mr. serhiy, glory to ukraine, to the heroes glory. zelenskyi is going to the united states of america and according to yakon today he writes that zelenskyi will visit new york, where the un general conference will take place. the un assembly will try to convince the biden administration for the last time to allow the use of long-range missiles on the territory of the russian federation. at the end last week they visited merav and yermak in washington. in addition to long-range weapons, we are talking

about zelenskyi's victory plan or ukraine's victory plan implemented by zelenskyi. how successful do you think they will be? attempts by zelenskyi and yarmak, and in this case umerov, to convince the americans to grant us permission to use weapons on the territory of the russian federation. of course, i would like to hear your opinion on what the victory plan should be, because we only know the title of the work, zelensky’s victory plan, the content of the work itself, i think so far no one has seen and no one understands what this plan might be and how different it is from zelensky's plan, the peace plan? i think that the victory plan should not be zelenskyi’s, but ukraine’s victory plan, because only hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of ukrainians, who

have been fighting for the freedom and independence of their country for more than 900 days, and many of unfortunately, many of them gave their most precious life and health, so here i am not belittling the role of the president as such, but i do not want to hypertrophy him, i think it is wrong, i believe that we... should talk about things that actually exist at the moment, a delegation visited the states, well, in a fairly familiar composition, which was formally headed by first vice prime minister yulia sveredenko, in reality it was headed by the head of the president's office andriy yermak, that is why yermak had various meetings, including with the political advisers of leading western leaders, i... you know, there is actually a simple assessment, they are carrying out a mandatory

program, well, without this mandatory program, i think that it would be more difficult for us, but not for me i see, unfortunately, i don't see how ukraine can offer a victory plan before the presidential elections in the united states, and that there will be a biden visa on... it, or a joint visa for trump and harris. i understand that the issue of ukraine will be in the debate of the presidential candidates next week and in the final stage of the presidential campaign in the united states, but imagine for today that the plan will be such that we all can together, because we are all interested in our victory. we can to convince the americans to provide us

with long-range weapons, to increase various capabilities, i am not sure, i am not sure for the simple reason that the stakes in the elections are very high in the presidential elections, and therefore there will be sociologically measured whether it is beneficial for the democrats, because only the democrats can really increase help country, and trump in this case will criticize it, and we must also understand that he will criticize everything that the government will do from the position of an opponent of the government, so we should strengthen internal stability more, and not play with head of ukrainian energy, it would be better for us to strengthen internal stability, and not to change personnel as we do, they change in a kaleidoscope, you know, we have a third of them... they are acting, but there are still ministers and vice - there are no prime ministers, there are instead

four, that is, mini ministers and three ministers and the head of the state property fund, who, it seems, has not worked in his position for a year, they will be dismissed, that is , we have, you know, the impression that a children's toy kaleidoscope was found in the president's office. they spin it in front of their eyes and they look at the configuration, and how will it be better, how will it be more attractive? it will be more attractive when it will work in the interests of ukraine, now and when it will be effectively communicated in the interests of ukraine. and when we continue, er, donate in the podolikiad information space, where the adviser to the head of the president's office can afford to say that the entire ukrainian society in principle. tolerates corrupt actions, well, i don't know why to say such things

in the conditions of war, why to give such arguments to our opponents, enemies, i would say frankly, because the opponents, they are more or less those who criticize us and do not try to destroy us, they can be understanding, but the enemies will not be understanding towards us, mr. yevgeny, to kyiv... the general director has arrived of the international agency for atomic energy magate and raphael grossi, before that he was at the kursk nuclear power plant, now he came to kyiv to convince ukrainians to be more careful when dealing with the kursk nuclear power plant, and before going to the occupied zaporizhia nuclear power plant, he should talk to zelenskyi, zelenskyi himself says that currently ukraine is only taking political steps in order to return the occupied zaporizhzhia as under its control. let's listen to what the president of ukraine has to say. regarding

the return of our station, i believe that today there are... only political steps, and, unfortunately, they are not enough, otherwise, the station is already back under our control, it is safer for ukraine to control the zaporizhzhia station, and for now from the point of view polyba vision, and i don't see the possibility, but the possibilities that are definitely there, they are... dangerous, so we believe that politically it is necessary to return our station, at least we talk about it on all platforms. so, mr. yevgeny, how harsh is kiev's reaction in your opinion, or is

it enough, this reaction is enough, we lost contact with yevhen magda, thank you. told the directors, er, next, friends, we will talk about the zaporizhia os, but zelensky says that there is no solution to the zaporizhia os yet, although we understand that the russians are now trying to use our capacities, energy capacities for the occupied regions of ukraine, and they drive this electricity and access of ukrainians there. there is no access to this large nuclear power plant, for the third year this plant has been under the supervision and control of russian terrorists, and this question is again before how magate together with rafael grossi react to this, we have yevhen magda in touch again, mr. yevgeny, what should

be the reaction of the magathe to the situation at the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. station, because grosius constantly pretends that this is normal, that the russians control the station, maybe they will protect it from the shelling of the ukrainian army, well, judging by his rhetoric, he goes there, he is met there and they say, we welcome you to russian soil, he calmly reacts to this too, isn't it time for something more to categorically ask ukraine about nuclear terrorism on the part of the russian federation and, accordingly... the introduction of sanctions against rosatom, which is now trying to build a nuclear power plant in mongolia, promised to build it, just hit nuclear energy economically russian federation? unfortunately, unfortunately, we

have no connection with yevgeny magda, sorry , dear tv viewers, obviously, obviously, we will follow... raphael grossi to kyiv and his reaction to the situation at the zaporizhzhia and kursk nuclear power plants, well, in the meantime the president of russia, the self-proclaimed president of russia vladimir putin came to visit mongolia, despite all the objections of the world community, he demonstratively flew to ulaanbaatar. and actually there he tried to show that any international rules are not for him. having agreed to putin's visit, mongolia assumes part of the responsibility for russian war crimes - said the spokesman of the ukrainian foreign ministry, hegorhiy tykhiy, on the x social network, what the spokesman

of the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs says. mongolia allowed the accused criminal. avoid justice, thereby sharing responsibility for his war crimes. we will work with our partners to ensure that there are no consequences, that this has consequences for ulaanbaatar . well, in fact, we are talking about the fact that putin has absolutely no choice in the international legal field, and mongolia as well, because mongolia says that we are dependent on russia, so you see, we let putin go, no one will arrest him, and on the phone. we have yevgeny magda again, mr. yevgeny, i hope you hear us, yes, i hear, i see, everything is fine, yes, er, look, well... the situation with mongolia and putin, in fact, it calls into question the operation of international legal acts, which is the rome statute, which

regulates the very existence or validity of the decisions of the international criminal court, putin specially flew, apparently to mongolia in order to to demonstrate to the whole world that, in addition to the security situation, it can also influence international law. situation, that is , by destroying the security system, he is trying to destroy the international legal scheme, which is the situation that exists in the world now. in what way can the world prevent this? i would also like to say a few words about energoatom, rosatom, sorry, russian. the fact is that funds for the russian budget, and among those who buy nuclear or uranium ores for their own, i

think that this is the secret of why we we do not see any sanctions against this monster, which is really a monster, because the monster is influential. rafael grossi, in any case, colleagues, energy experts, they note that he at least... plays back to russia, and it is obvious that russia is worried about the prospect of losing control over the kurdish as, but it is equally clear that ukraine will not behave in any in any case, the kurdish as, the way russia behaves in zaporizhzhia, because the ukrainian military, they are not invaders, they are not occupiers, they are defending their homeland. what as for changes in the attitude towards russia, changes in approach, then my recipe is very simple: we have to create... a system in which it will be clear how the world will work without russia, how we should achieve this, how we should

dismantle russia, how we must convince of this, as we must do everything to convince the world that without dismantling russia and without deputizing those remnants or those pieces of russian. federations that are formed as a result of this dismantling, the world will not be calm, you understand, the logic of actions and rhetoric is russian, which currently exists, it shows that this is essentially a neo-nazi regime, which is misanthropic, which produces hatred for ukrainians and not only for ukrainians, and a sluggish reaction to all this, it will ... just drive the problem deeper, you know, it will be such a huge geopolitical abscess in the size almost one-sixth of the landmass of the world, the largest abscess in size, and it

will be a very, very serious ri, to act as a surgeon who can cut it open and do everything so that this abscess no longer spoils the life of civilization. the world well, by the way, the president taiwan said that if china's claim to taiwan concerns territorial integrity, then the prc should also return the lands that were transferred to russia in the 19th century. if we are talking about territorial integrity, then why not return the lands occupied by russia, in accordance with the aigun treaty. russia is now very weakened, isn't it? zakharova already reacted from moscow. to the statement of the head of administration to taiwan, and here in principle, of course, she reacted in her own style,

but this is the story with the lands that were transferred russia in the 19th century, in a completely different way, could be used in our information and psychological special operations against the russians, because the transfer of part of its territories to china. russia, this is also an excuse to continue the same theme that vladimir putin tries to play on constantly, returning there to the times of lenin or to some ancient times. in your opinion, mr. yevgeny, will our partners in the world be able to use such situations in order to bring putin to his senses? i think that our partners, they will see through, but see through very slowly. it would be very nice if they saw more quickly, because the citizens of ukraine are paying for their insight with their lives and health, and this insight is necessary for the world. but

i cannot say that it is ahead of schedule, although on the other hand it is much faster than, say, in the period up to february 24, 2022, and we can compare those sanctions that were after the 14th year, those sanctions that currently exist, although even today they are insufficient. we did not find ourselves alone with russia, no, but it is ukraine that bears the burden of confrontation with russia. and this we have to wrap information correctly and use it correctly, we have to convince the world that it can do without russia. thank you, mr. yevhen, it was yevhen magda, executive director of the institute of world politics. september discounts on bronchial tubes. 20% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. in september, there are discounts on kombi grip, 20%

of leaflets. psyllium bam and ochad in september there are 15% discounts on magne b6 antistress in the pharmacies of psyllium bam and ochad. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals, and russia already has them. on the approach to exhausting the resources of topics that resonate in our society, this is the question of trump's victory, what it is, an analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do, are they able to use, say, the resources of the lukashenka army allied with them. vitaly portnikov and the guests of the project, read the entire condemnation, accept my singer, thank you, it was difficult, i was just interested, but that’s it

absolutely not stylish. to deal with the present and predict the future offered the united states to conclude a bilateral security agreement with us, a project for those who care and think politclub every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. every week, the saturday political club helps to understand the processes taking place in ukraine and... vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv, andriy smoliy and invited experts based on facts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events. if you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday politics club, every saturday on espresso. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp presentation of facts and

competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresin had done so, he would have gone to prison, a special view on the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, and beyond its borders, then who is china , my heart hurts, all this in an informational marathon with mykola veresny, saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. congratulations. friends, live on the espresso tv channel, the second part of the verdict program, and for the next 45 minutes we will talk about the following. extension of the axis of evil. mongolia must share responsibility for the war crimes of its russian guest. why does the world allow putin to destroy the international legal system so easily. a plan to win.

the president's office is preparing a document that should convince the americans to increase military support for ukraine, is it possible to defeat russia relying solely on external forces? tax increases have been curbed. the verkhovna rada failed the draft law on changes to the tax code for the period of martial law, what might change on a re-second reading? friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us on these platforms, please subscribe to our pages, take part in our survey, today we ask you about that is, do you support renaming the kopeck to shah, meaning a small kopeck, a small coin that is now in ukraine, to shah to the historical name of this kopeck. therefore,