yes, it automatically cuts off all kinds of possibilities for their physical destruction, that is, the poles either have to make some adequate and reasonable decisions, yes, or at all remain silent about the fact that they have a desire, even over their territory, over their own territory, to shoot down some russian means of destruction , it is entirely the fault of the poles that they don't want it, that means they don't want it, and all their excuses are worth watching. should i shake hands? yes, there are a lot of questions for our neighbors, well, actually, which ones for the north atlantic alliance, since, you understand, i'm sorry to interrupt you, the poles give more and more stupid answers to these questions, do you understand? oh, well, there was no such thing at all, even the nato watchers did not think that the pilot should look at the object, maybe it was a lost ukrainian plane, which ukrainian plane is flying and wandering now? near the borders of poland,

this is a rhetorical question, i completely agree with you. mr. valery, president zelenskyi said just a week ago that ukraine is preparing or testing new ballistic missiles, as soon as ukraine can go into mass production of long-range weapons, when these weapons can be used deep in the russian federation? well, in about the 26th year at best, you, you just shocked me now with the terms, because i understand that two years of war, an intense war, such as it is now, in principle, well, they do not give a chance for that that these ballistic missiles will be made, and the president, the first sentence was that the missile was successfully tested. and let's say this, if

we assume to skip the middle part, the second sentence was that there is no money in the budget the ministry of defense for its further development, this, this , this all sounds very sad, to be honest, well, that is, they will try to attract private money, yes, and private money, well, you understand, when in general, for americans , private companies produce everything, most of the weapons, yes , but in our country everything is produced by state-owned companies. in addition to drones, there are also certain types of military equipment, that is, there is no money, there are no missiles, and this is a very difficult process, the most difficult type of weapon is the development of ballistic missiles, so it is good if we manage to get the main components, for example, fuel, high-calorie fuel, yes, if you can get it, because we have no experience with solid-fuel rockets at all. we didn't produce, we produced

liquid-fuel missiles, and for operational-tactical missiles, a liquid-fuel engine is nonsense, that's why we need a lot of money, we need components that helped us speed up this process, and the issue of production, we produced missiles in dnipro, now it is somehow, well, there is gunpowder where it would be possible to produce, say, fuel for solid propellants. wagons on their base, yes you can, that is in sum, now all these cities are under fire, under frequent fire, near-frontline cities in fact, in fact, in addition to this announcement of this ballistic missile, zelenskyi also said that the ukrainian defense forces used the ukrainian long-range polyanytsia drone missile for a military purpose for the first time territory occupied by russia.

of the crimean peninsula occupied by russia in august of this year, what kind of missile, drone, drone is this, do we understand which ones, what is the configuration of this drone missile, and again, how many of these drone missiles can be in ukraine at production adjustments? well, as for the configuration, we only know the aerodynamic one. scheme, this is a classic aerodynamic scheme without elements of stealth technology, this is not it, this is a volunteer rocket, what was shown to us as a clearing is a slightly different product, here is a typical scheme, a duck, so it has horizontal front feathers, we were shown with with the rear arrangement horizontally, well, with the rear arrangement of the control rudders, let’s say this, about this rocket,

you see, nothing specific is known, even geometric dimensions, but to do assumptions, it is necessary to tell for a few minutes on the basis of what... such assumptions are made, and since there is no information, and well, the first rocket flew, i do not think that these are test launches, i think that this, let's say, is the beginning of small-scale production, as it can be, it can be scaled, that's why i hope that with cruise missiles we will have success with the production of cruise missiles and their use in battles in battles in our country. there will be more success, i.e. you should also wait for a baby girl, not earlier than the 26th year, well, if not, palyanitsa, yes, we are palanitsas, i was already the first launch, i hope that by the end of the year our troops will receive some number of these missiles, the question is how many, and the question

of the characteristics of this missile, and the question, and this is not a rocket, it is a drone with a jet engine , in any case, this is how it was announced, a rocket is another, a rocket is another... a high-precision product, and a drone is one for area purposes, that is why it is generally a simpler product, and in order to use it successfully, they are necessary much more than rockets, because, for example, with a pair of stormshadows, we can hit any protected or unprotected object in crimea, and drones are needed for this, well, more than a dozen, another topic, mr. valery. which is relevant enough and remains relevant, is the f-16 crash on august 26 of this year, the day russia used more than 200 air targets to attack ukraine.

there were many versions, maryana bezugla, a people's deputy, wrote that it was apparently a friendly train, then there was a public discussion between. round and olyshchuk, who headed the air force of the armed forces of ukraine, olyshchuk advised her not to go there until the end of the investigation, then oleshchuk was dismissed, what do you think could have happened to the american plane and to that plane and most importantly to the pilot, because the main value of this situation is that a person who knew how to fly an f-16 died , you see, here... technical, well, it could be anything, none of the versions is turned off, even friendly fire, according to the latest information, this version does not turn off, so it means that something could have happened here, well, a technical failure is unlikely or, because

the pilot did not have time to eject, and that's fine the reasons for the fact that everything happened instantly, the pilot nevertheless went through a serious training course, a former pilot... the commander of mig squadron 29, a lieutenant colonel, posthumously received the rank of colonel, he is a very experienced person, and how to pull on himself, that means, two handles catapult chair up, he would instantly find his way, here is either a-ah, a sudden loss of control, what with the control system, or really friendly fire, but so far, there is no information, so to speak , no official... information on this topic, or, for example, alternatively, he tried with a gun to shoot down a shahed or a cruise missile, well, because in general the f-16 is capable of doing this and is able to do it relatively easily, but the projectiles could initiate the detonation

of the warhead with damage to the aircraft, this would also happen instantly, because shooting was from well up to 1 km at a distance, so there are many options. and i support the opinion of the commander, the former commander already, unfortunately, yes, that we have to wait for the official version, because there are really many reasons, there may be many, this plane wreck, could it be the reason for that these planes will start arriving in ukraine more slowly, or in some way our western partners will say, well, they don't know how to use these machines at all, let's teach them even more and... the period from the transfer of the planes to their use will also be stretched into time, these are not mutually, not interconnected things, we have been told so far that we have an unchangeable six or an unchangeable ten, here is different information, this means that

no matter how many aircraft we lose in combat, we will still have 10 aircraft at all times , or six aircraft, whichever so, well, there are different versions of how many planes we... received, in total we were supposed to receive 10 planes from denmark and the netherlands, and in september, by the end of september, we must prepare for... pilots, well, for these planes, actually, and therefore, it means that some kind of, well, it is necessary, yes, indeed, a normal flight training course should last, should last 30 months, for precisely this and for such a period of time they train f-16 pilots for slovakia and for bulgaria, yes, and that is why the americans were dissatisfied , when we... went through a shortened training course, nevertheless, for now, so finish the funding

by the americans, well, by the united states , the training of the second group of pilots will be completed in september, at the end of september, well, so the money should run out, so, according to the allocated plan for this financial year, the training of... ukrainian pilots at the base in romania, at the feteshti air base, yes , has not yet been financed by the american side, that is, the issue of training further pilots was not resolved before the plane crash, and they are not related to each other. thank you, mr. valery, for the conversation, it was valery romanenko, aviation expert and leading scientist employee of the state museum. friends, i remind you that we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our

youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live there, please subscribe to our pages, like this video, and vote in our survey, today it sounds like this: do you consider it timely to renew the personnel of the ukrainian government? yes, no, it's pretty simple on youtube, either yes or no, if you have an opinion, please leave it in the comments below this video if you watch us that on the air, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote by numbers. if you consider it timely to update the personnel of the ukrainian government - 0800-211-381, not 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free. vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next , ihor reiterovych, political scientist, head of political and legal programs of the ukrainian center for social development, will be in touch with us. mr. igor, i congratulate you, thank you for... joining our broadcast, good evening, let's talk about personnel changes in

shmyhal's government, they have already started today, the verkhovna rada of ukraine dismissed from her post the vice prime minister for european and euro-atlantic integration of ukraine olga stefanishyna, tomorrow she may be reappointed as the head of the joint ministry of justice and european integration, the deputies also dismissed oleksandr kamyshin from her post minister of strategy. from the post of minister of environment protection and natural resources and denys malyuska from the post of minister of justice, but at the same time the dismissal of vice prime minister iryna veryshchuk and the head of the foundation was failed vitaliy koval state property. in fact, this is what my colleague journalist tetyana nikolayenko explained by saying that today is the anniversary of grigory surkis and... those who always vote as a servant of the people went to the 75th anniversary

of surkis, and did not vote for these resignations, how do you see this personnel rotation, it is, as they say, changing the beds in the government, maybe something else needs to be changed, or to what extent it is in time, what it gives and whether it gives in conditions when all... power is concentrated in in the hands of five or six of zelenskyi's managers. i, by the way, about koval and veryshchyuk heard slightly different versions, not only related to the anniversary of surkis, but that there is also the reluctance of part of the faction to simply vote for the resignation of kovel, so that he will then go to the ministry of agrarian policy, and they are not very satisfied with this, and according to ms. veryshchyuk, it is also fun story, she did not really want to leave her post and, as it were, asked that she, well, not be voted for, but she was not enough. conversation with the president, the president offered her a new position in the office of the president, and she will actually go to work there, and that's what

the funniest thing, probably, well, these people are really there , ms. vereshchuk, mr. kamyshyn, who will go to the president's office, they think that this is a promotion for them, although, well, formally, of course, in a parliamentary-presidential republic , the position of a minister or a vice, especially a vice-premier of the prime minister, it is much more significant than the position in the office of the head of state, but we understand that there are some informal moments here, and these informal moments are dominant today. about this whole story in general, well, on the one hand , it is expected, because the conversations about the need for personnel changes, they have been going on for a long time, well, we had five ministers who were acting ministers. one way or another, they had to be appointed as full-fledged heads of the ministries themselves, but also in other ways, well, it was felt that the president had a certain desire to add a new impulse, or perhaps, you know, to make such a shock from the side in order for the cabinet of ministers to be more active, worked more effectively, people who will come to certain positions, they were more motivated, because i was surprised

to learn today that some ministers who went to resignation, they are emotionally in... burning, they were tired of working there for 5 years as a minister, they should be thanked, they accomplished some feat, well , to put it mildly, it surprised me, to some extent even outraged me, because many people elected officials really wrote about this, well, i just have a simple question, for example, a teacher at a school or a teacher in a kindergarten, they do not burn out emotionally, and their work seems to me to be many times more difficult than that of a minister, but at the same time they are not leave, do not write statements, let them go let's go somewhere, we need to rest. to reboot there and so on, but the point is that the president's attempt is clear, it is clear why the cabinet of ministers as a whole is not touched at all, that is, they do not change, they do not nominate a new prime minister, they do not fire shmygal, and so on , the issue here is not what the speaker of the parliament said, that it seems that this cannot be done during the legal regime of martial law, it can actually be done, but these

are, you know, partial decisions, which according to the logic of the president's office... should and to change the attitude towards the cabinet somewhat, and to divert the attention of citizens from some problems, and in principle to have arguments later, they are reasonable enough, but i think they will be used, that something will not work out, because while new people have arrived, people need time, when they have already worked there for a couple of months, then we will actually ask them, but in fact it all looks like this, although i think that in the best case, in the best case, we will not just lose what we actually had in the context . the work of the government there until today day, in the worst case, we will of course have very big problems, because there are questions about certain candidates, but the main thing here is not even that, the main thing is that all these people are new, they need time, they need time to understand their activities their ministries, and there is really no time today, and sometimes people come there who are far from the sphere where they

will actually work, that is, they will need even more time than for an example for a person who, after all, let... . maybe new, but a professional in one or another field, here , in fact, there are questions throughout the entire list regarding the fact that they will very easily understand the specifics of the work of a minister in the field that will be entrusted to them and will be able to effectively perform the tasks assigned to them. we will now listen to what zelensky says about personnel changes in the government and why they are necessary. please. first, we need more interaction between the central government and... communities, especially now during the preparation for the winter season. second, ukraine has already achieved significant results in defense production. and this should be strengthened at all levels. in particular , so that it would be easier to attract investment from partners in our strategic

industries. third, we must significantly strengthen our work with nato. this requires a special interaction. the fourth is the european union. actual membership negotiations, preparation of relevant parts of the future membership agreement. this is a very clear, simultaneous, legal and political work. there will be personal responsibility for it. and fifth, it is necessary to combine everything that ukraine has achieved in relations with partners. well. in short, a lot of things said the president, the only thing he didn't say was why the president's office actually initiates changes in the government, because we live in a parliamentary-presidential republic, there are only two ministers, or rather three: prime ministers, the minister of defense and the minister of foreign affairs , who can be changed or submitted to the verkhovna rada by the president

of ukraine, and in this situation he said a lot about the fact that... it is necessary to strengthen cooperation with nato, it is necessary to strengthen cooperation with the european union, many directions, and in this story for me it is absolutely incomprehensible why the statement the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine dmytro kuleva wrote about the dismissal, and today there is information that the consideration of this issue in the verkhovna rada has been urgently postponed for the time being, and this was reported by people's deputy yaroslav zheliznyak, without specifying the reason. do you understand, mr. igor? the logic of the actions of zelenskyi's team, given that dmytro kuleba is perhaps not the most professional and the most prepared minister in shmygel's government, but look, here is an interesting one. moment, mr. arakhamia wrote that when they met with the president, andrii sybiga was going to the ministry of foreign affairs, that is, this issue was raised, and it

was not really considered by the factions, and as i understood it, it was one of the first, that is , maybe tomorrow there will still be an attempt to satisfy the resignation of kuleba and appoint sabiga himself, why is this happening in relation to the ministry of foreign affairs, well, look, this is an interesting moment, on the one hand it is really difficult to find any negatives. moments, well, such frankly negative moments in kuleba's activity. he was definitely in his place, he did a lot, tried a lot, wasn't afraid to make tough enough statements represented ukraine's position, but i think that two factors worked against him somewhere. the first factor, after all, when he actually agreed to the role that was imposed on him by the office of the president, and i mean that according to our legal framework in general , he ... should be the second person in the country, which is actually responsible for foreign policy after the president, but he gave up this place, and a lot of functions that actually

belong to him and his ministry, he took over the office of the president and individual persons of this office, for example, the head of the office andriy yermak, we all know very well what issues he deals with, the president assigns them to him, and this is purely a function of the ministry of foreign affairs. kuleba agreed to this, he was in principle actively against it... he did not speak out, but i think that there were still certain fears in the office that he was not so loyal to his own person, let's put someone who worked in the office, i will immediately note, by the way, that in relation to mr. sibigi, there are no reservations at all from the point of view professionalism, this is a very high-class, highly professional person who is perfectly familiar with the work of a diplomat, has a lot of experience there and so on, he will definitely be a good minister, but in this case we are saying, why exactly is the hesitation being taken there. therefore, most likely, they want maximum loyalty and, in general, even the absence of any hints of their own position, which is inseparable from the position of ukraine,

but which may not have been previously agreed with the president's office. and there is another moment, it seems to me that a certain one is possibly emotional there is fatigue in the relationship between kuleba and the president himself, his closest entourage. well , it seemed so to me, because i remember recently, when there was a press conference of the president, and... just then the issue of the ministry of unity was touched upon, the journalists said that it was the idea of ​​the kuleba, the president said, well, not offended, that in fact the situation a little different, this is my idea in general, and why did it look like that, and why is it being promoted as if it were kuleba, although kuleba did not say anything extraordinary there, and it is possible in the aggregate, well, that’s all this leads to the fact that he also actually wrote this statement, but it is interesting that they really did not vote for it today, and maybe there are still some negotiations going on and some... a decision is being made, because it will be strange if he at least will remain without a job and will not be involved in some directions that are important for ukraine. and you know, here is one more point, just the president, when he made

his statement there, his first point was about strengthening and improving the interaction between the central authorities and the central authorities and local self-government bodies. i'm just looking at the list of those ministries that are being changed, well, except for the ministries of the ministry of the region, in principle all the others up to local self-government have a very yes... such a relationship, in the context of the heating season, the minister of energy had to be dismissed first of all, but in everything is fine, the head of ukrenergo was fired instead, and the minister of energy continues his work, although it seems to me that he has the most questions and he should definitely be on the list of those who will leave the current cabinet. dmytro kuleba, currently in his capacity as minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, commented on how mongolia violated its international obligations, in particular regarding... the detention of people who have warrants issued by the international criminal court, in an interview with cnn, dmytro kuleba said that

mongolia should be responsible for these violations, because in fact it is a matter of doubt, that the international legal framework in general is being questioned, let's listen to what kuleba said. we sent them a very clear signal on the eve of the visit, it was ignored. we sent a clear signal after the visit started, it too is ignored. we will discuss further actions in ukraine and with our international partners after the war criminal's visit to mongolia. mr. igor, it is obvious that what happened in mongolia is probably putin's touchstone. in the event that this will be repeated with other states that have signed and ratified the rome statute, and perhaps even delegated their judges to the international

criminal... you know, i think that, in fact, there are no other precedents yet will be, and at least for quite a long period of time, this is not an excuse for mongolia, but it is necessary to take into account the specifics of the situation of this country, it actually, well, it should not have invited putin, but we understand why it happened and who asked that they putin's principles were accepted, but they physically don't have... the ability, not even to detain putin, to even try to hand him, for example, a warrant, so i think that this situation will not go further for now, the only thing that the international criminal court really need somehow react to it, introduce some certain, well, restrictions for mongolia, well, of course, not exclude it there and so on, but nevertheless , some, well, punishment is certain, yes, it is within the limits of that regulatory and legal framework, it should be, and others countries should

think very carefully about this precedent, understand what to repeat, well, well, what to repeat what mongolia actually did, but something tells me that, for example, to the same armenia or some other country, putin will not fly, because there will be a completely different situation, that is, to things, he did not fly to the south african republic, because he was directly hinted there that it is better not to do this, i think that other countries that have ratified the rome statute, they will now be very cautious about such visits, russia will try to do this throughout history to use the information somehow. but i will tell you that even according to the actual analysis of some of their internal publics, it did not achieve the result that putin was counting on, it did not turn out to be a super critical situation, it did not work out very well for him to show himself as a winner either, because everyone perfectly understands why mongolia in particular, why the visit took place now, who asked for it, and what were the real opportunities in mongolia, what were the ways to detain him there, so i think that it will simply continue until

it goes, until it goes , but this is also a signal... for the iss, including, it is possible to make some adjustments to its legal framework, relations with various other countries and do everything to ensure that a similar precedent does not repeat itself in the future, because it will already be not very good looking you know, it can still be somehow understood when it happens several times, well, this is already a trend, and this trend is clearly negative for the iss as a whole, as well as international justice, by the way, the european union expressed regret about what. .. bolya hosted the head of the kremlin and did not arrest him, as required by the warrant of the international criminal court, well, let's hope, mr. igor, that this warrant of the international criminal court will still get to putin sooner or later, especially since this warrant is not can be revoked, that is, it is written out and that's all, it is already for life for putin, there can be no arguments and no objections from the kremlin, because the war criminal is

the leader of the current russia. thank you for the conversation, it was ihor reiterovych, a political expert. friends, we work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. during the entire broadcast, we conduct polls. we ask you about the following: do you consider it timely to renew the personnel of the ukrainian government. yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, if you have a separate opinion, write it anyway please comment under this video. and, let me remind you, the phones for voting, we will continue in the second part of our program, this is a vote 0800 211 381, if you consider the personnel update of the ukrainian government timely, no 0800 211 382, ​​if you show now, dear directors, the interim results of our survey television, yes 26%, yes 74% no, in 15 minutes we will return to the studio, we will have viktor

boberenko and serhiy. aran political pundits, then news from the bbc, stay on espresso. for the fourth day in a row, russia is shelling ukrainian cities, that night lviv was under attack. rockets hit the city center, killing seven and wounding dozens. do they testify? daily shelling about the new tactics of the russians, what is the purpose of this missile terror, we analyze in today's edition of the bbc, i am olga polomaryuk. in lviv, the demolition of the rubble after the night shelling was completed, seven people were killed , two of them children, and 64 people were injured, this is the data of the local authorities. at first drones flew at the city, then rockets.