more precisely, the leader of today, here some hard-working person throws something at him, but it was not explained, guess for yourself, but the worst thing is that they do not explain to the servants of the people, and they have 130-150 servants who vote just like that, because they vote , because well, well, damn, that’s how it’s supposed to be, they kind of explained arahamia there, they really told him the truth, yes, and why explain to the rest, so... now these good people are trying to tell us all something new energy is needed, what passions are new there or something more passionate what did the president have in mind, he always speaks in gibberish and in riddles, because if he talks about passionarians like that, there is a popular ukrainian proverb that is worse. a fool, a fool with

an initiative, yes, we need new fools, maybe we need competent people, or just people who will obey the president’s office, as you said, there are no markers according to the government’s program, they will say, well, wait serhii, what are you saying, there, like during the war, we can accept some government programs in ukraine until the year 2000, we would win, there will be a victory, then we will see, but they will not explain to us... why they fired these people, no one will explain, guess for yourself, or an explanation, but today zelensky will come to the servant of the people faction, and will not explain why the abomination was removed these, and those who carry cash were not removed there, and why so, well, because we have a suspicion, and that's not all, they are now there , how many up to a dozen ministers are there , or will reassign or appoint ours there.

the three ministries were already without ministers, and they will not appoint under which new ministers were chosen by the criteria, because it is assumed that these criteria are very clear and understandable, yes, for example, i graduated from the academy of public administration there, everything is clear there, strategic thinking, the ability to select and arrange staff, communication, ee, professionalism, stress resistance, in general resistance, including to orders. from the president's office, will you bow to them there or not, and in the end, decency, but no, a criterion will be applied, yes, we love the tsar or not, we obey the ermak or we don't obey, well, there may be some other criteria, we carry it, we bring it in or we don’t bring it in, that’s all, there are three criteria that are needed when choosing a minister, yes, no, not in all ministries it is necessary to carry out, yes there, well, the fourth one, what else can there be, well... no one no no no no one will remember there

is a marker there, as if it were the perception of the society, and who cares, no, of course, they will not take the completely tainted, but no one needs such a criterion there, as there is the perception of society's perception of this minister, who in the end is interested in the opinion of society, well, maybe somewhere in the background g7's opinion and that's all, well, by the way... this whole story with the change of ministers is quite so strange, because i still expected to the last that the prime minister of ukraine would be changed, and denys shmyhal would be replaced by another manager , a top manager in zelenskyi's team, and in fact denys shmyhal is such a long-term prime minister in the history of ukraine, the longest, it seems to me, but collectively the longest. more collectively

, the prime minister was yulia tymoshenko and yanukovych, two figures who could compete there, i can't remember exactly now their years are in quantitative years, but denys shmyhal is still the prime minister of ukraine for the fifth year, mr. serhiy, how is such a figure, a political figure, denys shmyhal in the sense in which we... . are used to seeing the head of the government, a person who is responsible for the situation in the country, a person who answers all questions, a person who goes out to the public, a person who is not afraid of people, a person who is not afraid of journalists, and a person who can to answer for one's words, you know, this is a kind of comparison, if you compare shmygal with tymoshenko or yanukovych, because all those previous premiers, any without there, it doesn't matter what they did there.

good or bad, but in any case, all these prime ministers, they were the result of a political compromise or political agreements in the parliament, that's why they were political figures. and if these are political figures, then it is, accordingly, a completely different story than when now under a monomajority and still in wartime conditions, a person is appointed without any consultation with other political parties, this is also a different situation, a different situation, which actually lays zero responsibility on shmyhal for what he does, because in any case the government, which is now a monopoly everywhere in our country, is responsible, and shmyhal, he is not a political figure, he just is. is a manager who performs the work, previous prime ministers, they were somehow forced to adjust their actions with other political forces, otherwise the coalition, situational or long, which was formed in the parliament, simply did not hold together and then it would have been necessary to change

premieres, so these are different stories, but in general i think that i agree with mr. victor, it is certain that shmygal will be kept until the new year, that is, then it is necessary, when towards the end... it will be necessary to show renewal, hope, maybe he will change the prime minister then, and again there will be no special explanations, but it will be just such a symbolic sacred step that they say, here we have a change of personnel, a new, even newer energy is coming, and now it will be better, but you know, i still want to emphasize that these are all political now, and here are such semi-political steps in the conditions of wartime, they are actually are of little consequence, because when the time comes... the conditions of an open policy again in ukraine, whether it will be some kind of strategic pause in the war or whether we all wish for a victory, when this open policy resumes, then a lot will depend on the results of the war, and it is much more will affect political schedules,

political ratings, than any current personnel reshuffles, and it is the results of hostilities that will create a new policy from the point of view. support for the ratings of political forces, and now this is all that is happening, it has such a local significance, it shows that the authorities are changing something, something is ready to change one for another, without much explanation, but this is not of such decisive importance that it would lay the foundations for us, for example, to now predict who will be the next prime minister after the elections , well , theoretically, you are talking about this very early, everything will be resolved after the conditions of democracy become possible in our country. freedom of speech, free competition, then everything will be completely different, and all these personnel changes will actually have very little meaning that anyone will remember them at all. thank you, mr. serhiy, friends, i am addressing our viewers and tv viewers, i would like to remind you that we are conducting a survey during the entire broadcast, today we

are asking you about whether you consider it timely to update the personnel of the ukrainian government, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if there are your comments, which you... go beyond two unequivocal answers, please write under this video. if you watch us on tv, take your expensive smartphone or phone and vote for the numbers. if you consider the personnel update of the ukrainian government timely 0800 211 381 no 0800 211382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote at the end of the program , we will sum up the results of this vote. let me remind you that viktor boberenko and serhiy and. iran and gentlemen, we will talk, i hope, now about putin's missile terror, during the last few weeks we see how putin is trying to increase the degree of hatred of russians towards ukrainians and the degree of

the russian-ukrainian war, shelling in sumy, in kyiv, in kryvyi rih, in dnipro, in kharkiv, early today. have arrived cruise missiles to lviv, and so far our western partners avoid intervening in the situation, the poles say that we would help you rebuild what was destroyed in lviv, but we will not use our weapons to shoot down these air targets , which are launched by the russian federation, this is the policy of our western... partners, mr. viktor, what can it lead to? er, i don't know, to be honest, no, there's not enough evil, because, well, putin has already moved, er, everything, and, well, it seems that he specifically the event is annoying, showing the blows, there,

the last two blows in total, when it flew there along freedom avenue, and there on the kursk microdistrict, when it flew into the former kindergarten, but there... it was now , oh my god, well, you were called a foster child, yes, i was creating this salary, i forgot, it flew out of my head, as if it were bad luck, but... it flew, windows fell in hundreds of apartments, it flew clearly and specifically there and next to it, and next to it, there are none there infrastructural facilities, god forbid the military, it just flew into the microdistricts, v residential neighborhoods, i flew to poltava, i flew to lviv, and it seems to me that this is already becoming a position that they can show anything there on the domestic market... say, well, that's the same, these, that, that, there ,

there were a lot of soldiers there, everything was there, that’s why we hit on it there, but how to explain it to the westerners, well, how to explain it to the world, that they are stupidly hitting on civilians, not on any military objects, and they shrug their shoulders, they say, and that's how it was, and i think it's on purpose, they... test the power of the west there, like, well, what do you say to all that one thing, you won't shoot there, give ours on this, i'm on this, i'm on that, and that is, i'm afraid that this is just a test of a test, well, he thinks that he's testing us too, it's clear that experience is historical experience, including the experience of dresden and the experience of hiroshima shows that this in no way brings the nation out of itself and does not force it to surrender. but he shows the west that they can kill just people and

children, and that, and you can do nothing, i am afraid that this is the very moment, a new stage of the test of ukraine and ukrainians begins precisely because we will destroy you in apartments, and not only in some objects there. and how, mr. viktor, do the people of sumy react to these shellings? i know, late last night. they fired at the poltava polytechnic university yes, that is, yes, it flew there, and before that , it flew to the kursk microdistrict, it flew to rehabilitation, rehabilitation centers in the kursk massif, yes, yes, children, yes, there, where children are gathered before they are given there for adoption or something, yes, it is a small institution and that's where she flew, well, again... it didn't scare anyone, that is, if the enemy hopes that it will scare people, and someone

here will shout to zelensky there, smile under any conditions, then no, no, it only causes irritation, yes, we grind our teeth, grind, yes there, but we are no longer afraid, but hatred, that's for sure, i want people to know it, i think that the events in poltava and lviv will also prove it, not only that... in the direction of sumy, but all 10 bombs that flew in the direction of sumy, all cabs, they dumped on suja, they, right now they are first of all erasing suja from the face of the earth, so what can we get from this enemy, who fights with people? with the army, with the army, you see, it is difficult to fight, even in the pokrov direction, on suzhansky, but he fights with

people, including his own, well , the enemy has such a method, what can you do, but he does not add fear, does not add panic , yes, he adds caution, yes, someone took the children there, someone else somewhere else, but it’s just hatred, that’s all, thank you, mr. viktor, mr. sergey, yesterday the russian occupiers struck at... at the poltava institute communication and commenting on this tragedy, the president of the united states of america joe biden once again expressed the unwavering support of ukraine by the united states of america, i quote biden. i condemn this horrific attack in the strongest possible terms. this attack is a tragic reminder of putin's constant and outrageous attempts to break the will of a free people, but for 2.5 years the people of ukraine have stood firm, and so has the united states. continue to stand with him, including by providing air defense systems and capabilities

necessary to defend their country. not only did biden say in this speech or in this comment that the united states of america are ready to provide long-range weapons that will hit the territory of the russian federation, because in principle, the concept of capabilities necessary for the defense of ukraine, this concept absolutely fits, why. in your opinion, the united states of america and our western partners are watching now how putin is shooting the peaceful, peaceful population of ukraine, civilian cities. and at the same time, they say that you are holding on, you are fighting for freedom and a free world, and in this way our western partners seem to act as guarantors of putin's security, not ukraine. well, the strategy is understood in the west, and it can be explained by only one thing, which is that both the united

states and those countries that are part of the nato bloc, they protect their interests first and foremost, like any other. another country in the world is primarily protecting its interests, and from the point of view of the biden administration, these interests are to help ukraine to survive, but at the same time, so that there is no such escalation that could theoretically lead to the fact that a nato country, and therefore the united states will enter into a direct military confrontation with russia, well, this is the strategy in them, if ukrainians were wise in the 90s, and we then became members of the north atlantic alliance and... were under the umbrella of nato, and russia would have attacked some other country, and we would have helped this country, probably most ukrainians would have done the same did not want ukraine to directly participate in hostilities, because, first of all, each country is concerned about itself, so there is simply no need to be too idealistic, any country always does this, and the biden administration has always done this and will continue to do so in the future, if after

after the elections, supporters of the democratic party will remain in the white house and they will carry out the same... the same policy there, so we should not be offended here, we just need to understand it, but of course, well, we also understand the second run of this case, which is that if the west will not react, then the war will come to them, regardless of whether long-range weapons are provided to ukraine or not, because putin will feel impunity, but again, the nature of democracy is that until it happens, then in the west they are waiting for they hope that everything will be like this, that somehow it will subside. and nothing, and this wave of violence will not reach the western countries, but i, on the other hand , want to remind you that in the west, the troops still provide ukraine with weapons, and very different ones, but they do it so quietly, imperceptibly , so as not to cause unnecessary entertainment of putin, because i will remind you that a lot of those weapons, american weapons, including those that

ukraine now has, they also did not want to provide at first and also did not want to provide at first... with the same rhetoric, so that there would be no escalation, and then little by little, step by step, missile by missile, these weapons were provided, so i think that even now with regard to long-range missiles that the americans may provide us with, there will be approximately the same pattern: the biden administration will say no, no, no, this may lead to escalation, and then little by little they may provide those weapons, but not much to the point of opening up the possibility, and then amplifying that possibility with...or more weapons. well, of course, we would like to be given a lot of weapons at once, but it was necessary for this in ukraine to think all the years of independence so as not to have any illusions about russia, but to announce the course for joining nato, this should have been done back in the 90s, then we would not have all these problems that we have now. well, i think

that in any case now the west remains our partner, i think that it is not a surprise for anyone if i say that it is largely thanks to the support of the west that the ukrainian army can defend itself, because the west provides weapons, the ukrainians have courage, and the weapons are western, after all, and that's why they are we have partners, we have them, there are no others, and in any case, it is these partners who help us now and will help us, but of course, i repeat, they are primarily concerned about themselves, so they do not provide us with the weapons that we would like . to provide it with a lot of it at once, well, since all the agreements that were in effect after the signing of the budapest memorandum have been destroyed, and in principle we also made a commitment that we would not be a nuclear state and surrender nuclear weapons, perhaps there is a point in principle to start some discussion in ukraine regarding the renewal

of the nuclear status of ukraine, someone says that this non-nuclear... status and neutral status of ukraine is written in the declaration of state sovereignty of 1990, and they say that we should not depart from it, but if we take the constitution of the current ukraine and the declaration of sovereign state sovereignty of 1990, the constitution already clearly states that our course is towards nato and towards the european union, that is , there will be no neutral status in ukraine in the future, because it is foreseen. constitution and our move to nato, is it possible at the current stage to get the nuclear trump card and try to play it, mr. viktor. i think it is necessary to do this, not only that, many countries thought about the nuclear status after we disarmed and russia

attacked us, yes, that is, step one, we disarm, step two, russia attacks, that is, and it turned out that the signatories, well, the united states itself, there is britain, europe, no one came forward for us with military power to say that stop, you can’t do that, now it’s all obvious to everyone that you need to have the status of a nuclear state, at least the status, at least a few bombs that are lying there, we can say that we also have a nuclear club, in view of this , ukraine should at least talk about it, that it is lying there, okay, we will restore it, we have the potential, we have the opportunity, we have there, well, i don't know how we have enriched... in the morning there, but like, we will go to this to renew our nuclear status, why? because we are afraid of russia, there are madmen near us, they can only be restrained so that the nuclear blackmail

is mutual, that is why we have to go from statements, but to the maximum, well, i would, let's say this, well , to the next governments, to the next government that will replace zelensky, i would recommend that they be restored. nuclear status of ukraine, this is correct, because it was ours, our barrier against, well , against, against the russians. thank you, mr. viktor, mr. serhiy, this scenario is when ukraine will at least start a conversation, although this conversation, by the way, was started by zelensky before the big russian offensive in february 22nd at the munich security conference. he talked about it, then the russian propaganda twisted it and said "well, listen, they are already going to make a nuclear bomb there, so we, we have no

option left. is it possible to raise this question at all now, and what could be the result? i think that now the question should be asked not whether it is necessary, the question should be asked how. so, for any country to be able to develop nuclear weapons, first of all, this requires the colossal will of the political leadership of this country, and it is necessary for this country to be independent of others, because the club of nuclear countries is all without exception, they always are categorically against if any other country develops nuclear weapons, and in this case will be against... russia and the united states, and france, and all those who have nuclear weapons, that will be, they will all be against ukraine developed nuclear weapons. such is the nature of the nuclear club. therefore, ukraine, first of all

, needs to become economically and politically independent from any other country, or at least less dependent. unfortunately, this is not relevant for ukraine now, because ukraine is very dependent. western supply of weapons, but here is what i want to say, you say we need to start a conversation, no, we don't need to start a conversation, because the examples of countries that developed nuclear weapons despite the opposition of the world show that we need to talk less, we need to do more, for example, india, but then pakistan and maybe israel, when they were developing nuclear weapons, they didn't talk about it, they developed it first. then they tested it, and then they announced to the whole world that they had it, if they spoke, how much the world would oppose it, how much it would oppose it, what would they have to do with it

it is very difficult to do something, so really for the ukrainian government, well, for sure it will be the next generation of the ukrainian government, it could become very relevant, and i think it was right, the development of its own nuclear weapons would become relevant, but at the same time , it... not it's important, you don't need to do it loudly, you don't need to make a show, pr or promise about it, it's tomorrow, as we sometimes do now, it needs to be developed and then announced, then it will make sense, and then the world will be forced to accept it , as accepted the fact that india has nuclear weapons or pakistan or israel, well the truth is that there in israel they say that it might be a bluff, but at least they say that they do not have one, if, but if necessary, they will apply it, there is such a formula, well, i think that ukraine should approach this issue, and alternatives... of nuclear weapons, if they exist in principle, then it can be only one, it is the accession of ukraine to nato under the nuclear umbrella of nato, then it can somehow compensate.

conversations, and by the way, it can be a very constructive conversation with our western partners, when you simply explain to them that we have no way out, or you take us into nato and protect us with your nuclear umbrella, or we are developing our nuclear weapons, and then it will be a substantive conversation, this will be a very powerful argument for the west to accelerate the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine, by the way, the west will now develop more nuclear weapons, because everyone... perfectly understands that this is a russian threat, it can be a threat to the west again, so this conversation will be very relevant, but it must be done professionally, taking into account the experience of other countries that did develop a nuclear weapons, despite the fact that it would be very difficult. thank you, mr. serhiy, serhiy taran, viktor boberenko, were guests of our program today, gentlemen, thank you for participating in the program, i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast, we conducted a survey and your friends asked you whether you consider timely

personnel. the establishment of the ukrainian government, let's look at the results of the television poll: 24% yes, 76% no, on youtube we have a ratio of 37% yes, 63% no, we put an end to this, friends, it was the verdict of provia program serhiy rudenko, wish you good, take care of yourself and your relatives, goodbye. and what do you think about the lakaloot fix? reliably fixes, my dentist advised me, even particles of food do not get under the denture, and the price is good, the right choice for my pension, lakalot fix is ​​a new cream for extra strong fixation of dentures and healthy gums, so your choice is lacalut fix, in in beresna, there are 15% discounts on linux forte at

the pharmacy. traveller, bam and savings. fm: galicia. listen to yours. the book women at war. a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the spirit and letter publishing house. the book that based on reports. the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the ranks of the military. women at war, search in bookstores of ukraine. with the support of the konstantin zhivago charitable foundation. tingling, numbness or crawling tingling in the limbs occurs spontaneously and worries you. a special complex of active

substances dolgit antineuro. helps in normalizing the functioning of the nervous system. long-term antineuro helps to return to normal without tingling and numbness in the limbs. dolgit antineuro capsules - help for your nervous system. czech republic, ukraine only on mego. the league of nations is waiting for the national team, where it is necessary to score maximum points. support our boys on september 10 at 9:45 p.m. exclusively on meego. in september, there are discounts on magne b6 antistress. 15% in pharmacies plantain bam and oshchad. read the august issue of ukraine magazine. how maidan and the volunteer movement formed a new ukrainian identity. the phenomenon of ukrainian stability. why did the enemy underestimate the power of freedom? from the gray zone to european stronghold. what lesson did ukraine teach the world? ask at press outlets or pre-pay online. country. in the center.

main events laughter, physical activity, sneezing. even during such a small load, urinary incontinence can make itself felt. feminost uro helped me. thanks to the natural ingredients, feminost uro helps restore control over urination. uro, urination under control. in september, there are discounts on mukaltyn. 10% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. these are chronicles of the war, and in view of recent events two days, to donate to drones, this is an even more relevant and necessary idea, so i remind you that the espressu tv channel and the vesna charity fund are collecting funds for the purchase of modern drones and electronic warfare systems,