for the fact that they do not explain to the people's servants, and they have 130-150 servants who vote just like that, because they vote, because well yes, well yes, damn it, that's the way it's supposed to be, they explained the arachamiy there, to him they really told the truth, yes, but why should they explain to the rest, and now these good people, yes, are trying to tell us... everyone, something, what, some kind of new energy is needed, what passions are new there, or something more passionate, that had i mean, the president, in general, he always speaks in gibberish and in riddles, that’s it, because if he talks about passionaries, there is such a thing as ukrainian folk proverb, a fool is worse, a fool with initiative, yes, we need new fools there, maybe we need competent people, or is it just that? who will

obey the president's office, as you said, there are no markers on the government's program, they will say, well, wait, sergey, what are you saying there, like, how can we, during the war , accept some government programs there in ukraine until 2000 , some year, we would win , there will be a victory, then we will see, but they will not explain to us why they fired these people, but no one will explain, guess for yourself, or the explanation is today... zelenskyi will come to the servant of the people faction and won't explain why they removed the abomination, instead of removing those who carry cash, and why so, well, because we have a suspicion, and that's not all, they are now there, the number of ministers there, up to a dozen, will be changed or reappointed, or they will be appointed, there we have three ministries and there were no ministers, and they will not appoint according to what criteria he was. new ministers are elected,

because it is assumed that these criteria are very clear and understandable, yes, for example, i graduated there the academy of public administration, everything is clear there, strategic thinking, the ability to select and deploy staff, communication skills, professionalism, stress resistance, general resilience, including to orders from the president's office, will you bow to them there or not, and in the end, decency, but no, it will be... the applied criterion is yes, we love the tsar or not, we obey the ermak or we don’t obey, well, there may be some other criteria we carry, we bring it in or we don’t bring it in, that’s all there are three criteria that are needed when choosing a minister, yes well, not all ministries should be carried out yes there, well, fourthly, what else can there be, well, no one , no one, no, i won't remember there, a marker there, like if it were the perception of society. and who

cares, no, of course, they won’t take the completely tainted, but no one needs such a criterion, as there is the type, society’s perception of this minister, who ultimately benefits, society’s opinion is interesting, well, maybe somewhere in the background, the opinion of g7 , and that's all. well, by the way, this whole story with the change of ministers is rather strange, because i expected it. the latter, who will replace the prime minister of ukraine, and denys shmyhal will be replaced by another manager, a top manager in zelenskyi's team, and in fact denys shmyhal is such a long-term prime minister in the history of ukraine, the most, it seems to me, but overall, the most, overall, the prime minister was yulia tymoshenko, and well , yanukovych, two figures. who could

compete there, i can't remember their exact years now, in quantitative years, but denys shmyhal is the prime minister of ukraine for the fifth year, mr. serhiy, how is such a figure, a political figure , denys shmyhal, in vol in the sense in which we are used to seeing the head of the government, a person who is responsible for the situation in the country, a person. who answers all questions, a person who goes out in public, a person who is not afraid of people, a person who is not afraid of journalists and a person who can answer for his words. well, you know, it's a kind of comparison if you compare shmyhal with tymoshenko or yanukovych, because all those previous prime ministers, any, it doesn't matter what they did good or bad, but in any case these are all prime ministers, they were the result of a political compromise. or political agreements in

the parliament, that is why they were political figures, and if they are political figures, then it is accordingly a completely different story than when now under a monomajority and even in... wartime conditions a person is appointed without any consultation with other political parties. this is a different situation, a different situation, which actually imposes zero responsibility on shmygal for what he does, because in any case the government, which is now everywhere in our country, is responsible monopoly, and shmyhal, he is not a political figure, he is just a manager who does the work. previous premiers, they were somehow forced to adjust theirs. and with other political forces, otherwise the coalition, situational or long-term, which was formed in the parliament, simply did not hold together and then we would have to change prime ministers. therefore, these are different stories, but in general , i think that i agree with mr. victor,

probably that the shmygal is kept for the new year, that is, then it is necessary, when at the end of the year it will be necessary to show renewal, hope, maybe then the prime minister will change, and again there will be no special explanations, but this will be... just such a symbolic, sacred step that they say, here we are changing personnel, new, even newer energy is coming, and now it will be better, but i also want you to know what to emphasize, here are all the political steps that are now semi-political in the conditions of wartime, they actually have little meaning, because when the conditions of open politics come again in ukraine, well , it will be some kind of strategic pause in war or whatever. we all want it to be victory, when this open policy is resumed, then a lot will depend on the results of the war, and this will have a much greater influence on political schedules, on political ratings than any current personnel reshuffles, eh, it is the results of

military operations that will create a new policy with from the point of view of supporting ratings, political forces, and now this is all that is happening, it has such a local significance, it shows that the authorities are changing something, something there is ready to trade one for another, without much explanation, but it is not of such decisive importance, which would lay the basis for us, for example, to now predict who will be the next prime minister after the elections, well, theoretically, it is too early to talk about it, everything will be decided after the conditions of democracy, freedom of speech become possible in our country, free competition, then everything will be completely different, and these are all personnel changes in fact. will matter very little, if anyone remembers them at all. thank you, mr. serhiy, friends, i am addressing our viewers and tv viewers. let me remind you that we are conducting a survey throughout the broadcast, today we are you we ask about this, do you consider it timely to update the personnel of the ukrainian government, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if

you have comments that go beyond two unambiguous answers, please write under this video if you watch us on tv , take to... a smartphone or phone and vote by numbers if you consider it timely to renew the personnel of the ukrainian government (0800-211-381, not 0800-211-382). all calls to these numbers are free, vote at the end of the program and we will sum up the results of this vote. let me remind you that viktor boberenko and serhii taran are on our broadcast today, and gentlemen, we will talk, i hope, now about putin's missile terror. over the past few weeks, we see how putin is trying to increase the level of hatred of russians towards ukrainians and the level of the russian-ukrainian war, shelling in sumy, in kyiv, in kryvyi

rih, in dnipro, in kharkiv, today early in the morning cruise missiles arrived in lviv , and so far our... western partners avoid interfering in the situation, the poles say that we would help you to rebuild what was destroyed in lviv, but we will not use our weapons to shoot down these air targets launched by the russian federation, this is the policy of our western partners, mr. viktor, i don't know what it can lead to, to be honest, no, evil. enough, because putin has already gone over everything, and it seems that he is specially annoying the west, showing the blows there , the last two blows in total, when it flew there along freedom avenue and over there in

the kursk microdistrict, when it flew into the former kindergarten, but there where was he now? oh my god, you are a foster child, we were called yes i... i created this salary, i forgot, it flew out of my head out of spite, but it flew, it rained down windows in hundreds of apartments, it flew clearly and specifically there and nearby. and there are no infrastructural facilities nearby or , god forbid, the military, it just flew into neighborhoods, into residential neighborhoods, flew to poltava, flew to lviv, and it seems to me that it is already becoming a position that uh, well, they in the domestic market, they can show anything and say, well, it's the same that's the same ee there were a lot of military people there, that's all, we... there they beat on it, but, how to explain it to the westerners, well, how

to explain it to the world, that they stupidly beat on civilians, not on which military facilities, and they shrug their shoulders, they say, and that 's how it was, and i think it's on purpose, they 're testing the power of the west, there like, well, what do you say to that, anyway, you won't shoot there either our a... and that is, i am afraid that this is just a test, a test, well , he thinks that he is also testing us, it is clear that experience, historical experience, including the experience of dresden there, and the experience of hiroshima, show that this does not in any way bring the nation out of itself and does not force it to surrender, but it shows the west that they can kill just people and children, and what, and... you won't do anything, i'm afraid that right now , a new stage of testing ukraine and

ukrainians begins precisely because we will destroy you, in apartments, and not only at some objects there. and how, mr. viktor, do the people of sumy react to these shellings? i know, late yesterday in the evening they fired at the poltava polytechnic university, and that is, they flew there. and before that it flew to the kursk microdistrict, i mean the flight lot, rehabilitation centers in the kurdish massif, yes, yes, yes, well, children, yes, where children are collected, before they are handed over there for adoption or something, yes, it's a small establishment, and i flew there, well, again, it didn't scare anyone, that is, if the enemy hopes that it will scare people, and someone here will shout there... zelensky, keep calm under any conditions, then no, no, it only causes

irritation, yes, we grind our teeth, we grind our teeth, yes, but we no longer have fear, but hatred, that's for sure, i want people to know this, i think that the events in poltava and lviv will also prove it, not only that, in the method of management on the rasseyushke, beat your own so that strangers are afraid, and yesterday... at night we had an urgent alarm there, it took off from kursk, flying in the direction of sumy, but all 10 bombs that flew in a hundred directions sum, all the cabs, they dumped on the sujja, they, they are now first of all erasing the sujja from the face of the earth, so well, what can we take from this enemy who fights with people, not with the army, with the army, you see, it is difficult to fight, even on the pokrovsky direction, on suzhansky, but he fights with people, including with... his own, well, such the enemy's method, what can you do, but it doesn't add fear, it doesn't add panic, yes,

it adds caution, yes, there, someone there took the children, there, someone somewhere else something else, but it's just hatred, that's all, thank you , mr. viktor, mr. sergey, yesterday the russian occupiers attacked the poltava institute of communication, and commenting on this tragedy, president of the united states of america, joe biden. once again expressed the unwavering support of ukraine by the united states of america, quoting biden. i condemn this horrific attack in the strongest possible terms. this attack is a tragic reminder of putin's ongoing and outrageous attempts to break the will of a free people, but for 2.5 years the people of ukraine have stood firm and the united states continues to stand with them, including by providing air defense systems and the capabilities necessary to defend their . country, biden did not say only in this speech, whether in

this comment that the united states of america is ready to provide long-range weapons that will hit the territory of the russian federation, because in principle, this concept absolutely fits into the concept of capabilities necessary for the defense of ukraine. why do you think that the united states of america and our western partners are watching now as putin...shoots the peaceful, peaceful population of ukraine, civilian cities, and at the same time, well, they say that you hold on, you are fighting for for freedom and for... a free world, and this is how our westerners seem to speak partners are the guarantors of putin's security, not ukraine. well, the strategy is understood in the west, and it can be explained in only one way, that is that both the united states and those countries that are part of the nato bloc, they protect their interests first, just like any other country in the world

protects first of all interests, and from the point of view of the biden administration, these interests are to help ukraine to survive, but at the same time, so that there is no such escalation that could theoretically lead to the fact that a nato country, and therefore and the united the states will enter into a direct military confrontation with russia. well, that's their strategy. if ukrainians were wise in the 90s, and we then became members of the north atlantic alliance and now we would be under the nato umbrella, and russia would have attacked some other country, and we would have helped that country. probably the majority of ukrainians. i would also not like ukraine to directly participate in hostilities, because first of all, every country is concerned about itself, so there is simply no need to have too much idealism, any country always does so, and the biden administration has always done so and will continue to do so, if after the election there will be supporters of the democratic party in the white house and they will pursue the same policy there, so you should not

be offended here, you just need to understand it, but of course, well, we also we also understand the other side. of this case, is that if the west does not react, then the war will come to them, regardless of whether long-range weapons are provided to ukraine or not, because putin will feel impunity, but again, nature of democracy is that until it happens, the west is waiting for, hoping that everything will be like this, somehow it will calm down and nothing, and this wave of violence will not come to western countries, but i, on the other hand , want to ... given that the west is still providing ukraine with weapons little by little, and they are very different, but they are doing it so quietly, imperceptibly, so as not to cause putin too much trouble, because i will remind you that there are a lot of those weapons, american weapons, including, which ukraine now has, they also did not want to provide at first, and also, at first did not want to provide with the same rhetoric,

so that there would be no escalation, and then little by little, step by step, missile by missile, they provided these... weapons, so i think that even now in terms of long-range missiles that the americans may provide us with, it will be approximately the scheme itself, the biden administration is going to say no no no, it could escalate, and then little by little they might provide these weapons, but little by little, so as if to open up an opportunity and then increase that opportunity by providing even more weapons, well of course we wanted to i wish we were given a lot of weapons at once, but... but for this , ukraine had to think for all the years of independence, so as not to have any illusions about russia, and to announce a course for joining nato, this had to be done before in the 90s, then we wouldn't have had all these problems, what now, well i think the west is still our partner anyway, i think

it's no surprise to anyone if i say , that largely thanks to the support of the west , the ukrainian army can defend itself. because the west gives weapons, the ukrainians have courage, and the weapons are western, after all, and therefore, what partners we have, we have such, there are no others, and in any case, it is these partners who help us now and will help us, and, but, of course, i repeat, they are the first to worry about themselves, that's why they don't provide us with the weapons that we would like to be provided immediately and very much, well, since all the agreements that were in effect after... under the signing of the budapest memorandum have been destroyed, and in principle, we are also obligations took, regarding the fact that we will not be a nuclear state and surrender nuclear weapons, perhaps it makes sense in principle to start some kind of discussion in ukraine regarding the renewal of ukraine's nuclear status. someone says that this non-nuclear status and neutral status

of ukraine is written in the declaration on state sovereignty of 1990, and they say that we should not... we should depart from it, but if we take the constitution of the current ukraine and the declaration of sovereign state sovereignty of 90- th year, the constitution already clearly states that our course is towards nato and towards the european union, i.e. no neutral status in ukraine in the future it won't happen, because this is provided for by the constitution and our move to nato, is it possible at the current stage to get a nuclear ... kozer and try to play with it, mr. viktor. i think it is necessary to do it, not only that, many countries thought about the... nuclear status after we disarmed and russia attacked us, yes, that is, step one, we disarm, step two, russia attacks,

that is, and it turned out that the signatories, well , the united states itself, there is britain, europe, no one intervened for us with military power, to say stop, you can't do that, now it's all obvious to everyone that... we need to have the status of a nuclear state, at least the status, even if there are a few bombs lying there, we can say that we also have a nuclear club , in view of this, ukraine should at least talk about it, that it is like okay, we will restore it, we have the potential, we have the opportunity, we have there, well, i don't know how we have enriched uranium there, but like, we're going to go to that to renew our nuclear status, why, because we're afraid. russia is next to us, there are crazy people, they can be restrained only so that the nuclear blackmail is mutual, that's why we have to go

from statements, but at the maximum, well, i would, let's say this, uh, well, the next governments , yes, the next government that will replace zelensky, recommended restoring the nuclear status of ukraine, this is correct, because it was ours, our barrier against... well, against against the russians. thank you, mr. victor. mr. serhiu, this is the scenario when ukraine will at least start a conversation, although this conversation, by the way, was started by zelenskyi before the big russian offensive in february 22, at the munich security conference, he talked about it. then the russian propaganda twisted it and said: "well, listen, they are already gathering nukes there." to make a bomb, that's why we, we have no option left, or is it possible to raise this question at all now, and what

could be the result? i think that now the question should be asked, not what is necessary, the question should be asked how? so, in order for any country to be able to develop nuclear weapons, it first of all needs a circle. the will of the political leadership of this country, and it must be this the country was independent from others, because the club of nuclear countries, all of them without exception, they are always categorically against if any other country develops nuclear weapons, and in this case russia, and the united states, and france, and all those those who have nuclear weapons, i will, all of them will be against ukraine developing them. nuclear weapons, this is the nature of the nuclear club, so ukraine first of all needs to become economically and politically independent from any other

country, or at least less dependent, unfortunately, this is not relevant for ukraine now, because ukraine is very dependent on western arms supply, but here is what i want to say, you say we should start a conversation, no, we don't. to start a conversation, because the examples of countries that, despite the opposition of the world, developed nuclear weapons show that we need to talk less, we need to do more, for example, india, and then pakistan and maybe israel, when they were developing nuclear weapons, they did not talk about it, they first developed it, then tested it, and then announced to the whole world that they had it, if they spoke, then the world... how much they opposed it, how much they resisted it, that it would be very difficult for them to do something about it, so really for the ukrainian government, well, for sure it will be

the next generation of the ukrainian government, it may become very relevant, and i think it was right, it became the development of our own nuclear weapons would be relevant, but at the same time it is not important, you don't need to do it loudly, you don't need to make a show, pr or promise about it, it's tomorrow, as we sometimes do now. it must be developed, and then announced, then it will be in this sense, and the world will then be forced to accept it, just as it accepted the fact that india has nuclear weapons or pakistan or israel, well, it is true there in israel they say that maybe it is a bluff, but at least they say that they do not have it, if, but if necessary, they will apply it, there is such a formula, well, i think that ukraine should approach this issue, and an alternative to nuclear weapons, if it exists in principle, then it can only be one, it is ukraine's entry into... under the nuclear umbrella of nato, then it can somehow compensate for this conversation, and to things, it can be a very constructive conversation with our western partners, when i simply

explain to them... that we have no way out: either you take us into nato and protect us with your nuclear shower, or we develop our nuclear weapons, and then it will be substantive conversation, this will be a very powerful argument for the event to speed up the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine. by the way, more nuclear weapons will be developed in the west now, because everyone perfectly understands that this is a russian threat, it can be a threat to the west again, so this conversation will be very relevant. but it must be done professionally, taking into account the experience of other countries that did develop nuclear weapons, even though it was very difficult. thank you, mr. sergey. serhiy taran, viktor boberenko were guests of our program today. gentlemen, thank you for participating in the program. let me remind you that throughout our broadcast we conducted a survey and asked you friends about the following: do you consider it timely to renew the personnel of the ukrainian government, let's see the results of the television survey, 24%, yes 70. no, on

youtube we have a ratio of 37% yes, 63% no, friends, we put an end to this, it was a program of the verdict of serhiy rudenko, i wish you well, take care of yourself and your relatives, bye see you, there are discounts for september. 10% off at the terme in travel bam pharmacies and savings. read in the august issue of the magazine kranaya. how did the maidan and the volunteer movement form a new ukrainian identity? the phenomenon of ukrainian stability. why did the enemy underestimate the power of freedom? from the gray zone to the european one stronghold? what lesson did ukraine teach the world? ask at press outlets or pre-pay online. country. in the center

of the main events, listen, in the pharmacy it will improve the condition of everyone, relieves spasm, helps bile, but wait, it has coal, not black, bile, not sour, nettle, not sting, garlic, not that, allochol , took it, alahol prevents gallstone disease and the development of cholecystitis, stimulates the secretion of bile and improves digestion processes. alohol is a natural benefit for the liver and gallbladder. the book women at war is a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the duh i lettera publishing house. the book is based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the ranks of the military. women at war, search in bookstores

of ukraine. with the support of the kostyantyn zhivago charitable foundation. ukraine-albania only on megago. conclusions after the euro are made. now it's time for the nations league, where we need to win every match. cheer on september 7 21:45. exclusively on megogo. fm halychyna. listen to yours. in the hands of a specialist, the medicinal plant belladonna, so dangerous in nature, turns into belastesin. an ally in the fight against spasm. belastesin is a medicine with belladonna extract. with gastritis and sharp pains in the stomach. v. vasyl

zima's big broadcast, two hours of airtime, two hours of your time, two hours to learn about the war and what the world is like, two hours to keep up with economic news and sports news, two hours in the company of your favorite presenters, presenters , which have become like family to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, espresso in the evening. in ukraine, the 14th edition of the news tells about the most important things of this hour. i am anna yavomelnyk, thank you for being with us. lviv is recovering after a missile and drone attack.