the work of the government after the replacement of nine ministers, after the replacement that took place yesterday, so yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have your own opinion, please leave it in the comments below this video, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381 if you think there will be an improvement in the way the government works, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free... vote, at the end of the program we 'll sum it up voting, and today is friday, today is traditional for us our journalistic friday, my colleagues, one colleague came to the studio, and the other one, i hope he will join via skype, so today we have andriy dyanitsky, andriy, congratulations, good evening, and we are still waiting for bohdan butkevich to join, and i hope , that after all he will contact our editorial office. and will be broadcast, well, since

andrei, we ask our viewers, tv viewers, whether they expect an improvement in the work of the government, well, it seems like such a rhetorical question, especially considering, considering our extensive experience of observing governments by rotations, well, it seems like a rhetorical question, and yet i will ask, we are not the first to say that the government performs such a decorative function that the decision-making center is actually in the president's office, and the government... performs such a ceremonial function, consecrates, all these decisions, well, they even tell me that almost every ministry has an adviser, well, before i said a watcher, but now they say an adviser who advises the minister on how to do the right thing, and obviously, if you just change the name of the ministers, without changing the team in general, no i will change without putting a person who will be more independent as the head of the government. with his vision, with

his, with his initiative, nothing will change, well, it's interesting that zelensky is actually talking about the fact that there will be new energy, new people, although if we look at these appointments, now we will see, here are nine as for the new ministers appointed by the verkhovna rada of ukraine, they were, in principle, in this bracket before, they were either acting , or somewhere... they were close to or worked in the office of the president of ukraine. so, olga stefanishyna, she became a minister of justice, and was the vice-prime minister for european integration. andrii sybiga, minister of foreign affairs, was the first deputy minister of foreign affairs, oleksiy kuleba, vice prime minister for reconstruction, minister of community development, and worked as the deputy head of the president's office, herman smitanin, minister of strategic industries, and worked. in ukroboronprom, vitaly koval,

the minister of agrarian policy, was currently the head of the state property fund, and before that, the head of the rivne regional military administration, mykola tochytskyi, that is a staff diplomat, and he was the deputy minister of foreign affairs, and was the deputy head of the office of the president of ukraine, and became the minister of culture and strategic communications. natalya kalmykova became the minister of veteran affairs and matvii bidny. minister of youth and sports, he was acting. svitlana grynchuk became the minister of environmental protection. well , to be honest, i have heard half of the surnames of these people, but i do not know anything about them, but from this list, of course, such surnames as mykola tochytsky deserve attention, because he became the minister of culture and strategic communications, apparently it is being created in our country. well, probably this ministry

will now be called rather, well, the minister, the ministry of propaganda and counter-propaganda, well , maybe during the war it is justified, but by the way, i wanted to emphasize the only positive story in with these appointments, that the ministries that did not have leaders for a long time , where there were acting officials, finally got their managers, and this is really positive, because any organization is managed by a temporary manager. then and the efficiency of this management is not very good, the subordinates think that this is a temporary boss, and it is possible not to listen to him very much and perform his duties quite formally, when now managers have already been appointed to the same ministry of information, for example, then obviously the work should go faster , this is the only plus, and what else i would like to note about...

thus the authorities decided to remove it, i heard it from one of the deputies from the parliamentary majority of the monomajority, that concerns. and such a request of the people for elections, because during the war elections should be held it's difficult, well, not as formal as russia is holding, where they just draw, but real elections are difficult, because some people are abroad, some are in the trenches, and it was shown by such and such a change of government that it was as if some kind of renewal of power had taken place, well, this this is also a purely psychological story, i don't think ukrainians will feel it, because i think there are percentages somewhere. 60 or 70 people cannot even identify or even say who oleksiy kuleba became the minister of development, there was already such a kuleba dmytro, so this is the brother or son of kuleba, yes

and, or or there, sibiga became the minister of foreign affairs, well, that is, even for us, for people who have been watching politics and personnel appointments and the minister for a long time. i remember, well, even 5 or 6 years ago , we clearly tracked who or how he came, what kind of person he was, and now they all basically follow the passport of one or two people, each minister used to be an individual , we looked at what plans this minister had, what approaches, how he, well, i remember he wrote a lot about transport, the minister was there vinny, he developed it primarily for... the difference, and when he was pivovarsky, he primarily blamed airplanes and brought low-cost islands here, that is, everyone had their own personal approach, and now, when we look at these ministers, well, the surnames are changing , and the approaches do not change, but regarding sebigi, i heard positive

reviews even before he became a minister, they said that he was one of the president's speechwriters, helped... write these speeches, which then gathered these applauses in all the parliaments of the world , and e, when he was appointed first deputy minister of foreign affairs, it became clear that he was already being prepared to become a minister, and when the scandalous order was issued not to issue, not to provide consular services to men abroad without presenting military registration documents, despite the fact that the law.. . the mobilization itself had not come into force at that time, so this scandalous order was signed by sybig, and not by dmytro kuleb, and then it became clear who is the master of the house and who is actually the minister, i.e. already at that moment it was

clear that sabiga was essentially in charge by the ministry of foreign affairs, and what was the claim against koleba, as colleagues from ukrainian pravda and other publications write. that he didn't want to see if it was feasible, i read it, that he didn't want to waste his hands, he didn't want to sign such dubious laws, orders from the point of view of the law, well, accordingly, they got rid of him, well, it must be said that the renewed government now has three people who are staff diplomats, that is, people who, or rather two for sure, this is andrii. sibiga, because he is not an accidental person, he was an ambassador, extraordinary and authorized ambassador to turkey, ukraine, and worked, as you said, as a speechwriter for zelenskyi, then he was a deputy for yermak and from april he began to perform the duties of the first deputy

minister of foreign affairs, but mykola tochytskyi is also a diplomat, and a career diplomat, that all those people who for a very long period... were in the diplomatic service, he was the ambassador to belgium, worked in euro-atlantic structures, and a person who graduated from the kyiv institute of international relations, although he was there , his first education was in philology faculty, he was a translator from the french language, by the way, he studied at the time when i was at the university, i remember him from tochytskyi university. and he was recently about to be appointed, i.e. instead of sybig, he came to the ministry of foreign affairs instead of him, and he went to the office of the president of ukraine and now he is the minister of culture and strategic communications, this should obviously be enough for such a separate

serious job, regardless of all these managers who are in the office of the president of ukraine, because after all... during the war, they are strategic communications is not only communications with a single telethon, it is about creating a system of propaganda and counter-propaganda that will work both in... europe and throughout the world, because, unfortunately, we do not have a foreign language as such, that is, there is a freedom, there is a house and what else is there, the whole united 24, well, this is a formal, at least not a state history, but rather as a public one, although we understand very well that it is still a tool, but such resources as it has, for example, and russia abroad, the united states of america abroad, germany actively works abroad, well many powerful countries have this... mouthpieces of their own that influence audiences

abroad, that is, we don't have this, obviously tochytskyi will do exactly this, do you think he will succeed? well, i don't know him personally, i also read his biography, i liked it, by the way, he worked a lot with kuleba and kuleba, well, i would actually see kuleba in this position, well, i understand that after the ministry of foreign affairs, he will head the ministry of information policy now strategic... strategic communications is not, probably in his eyes it would be downgrading, i don't know where he hasn't gotten tired of over the years, but if we talk about resources, it's not always all about resources, it's clear that we will never be able to compete with russia in terms of financing information campaigns, but let's see, what russia has achieved, all its attempts to influence the world through rashata. through the satellite, where they poured millions, billions, billions of dollars over the years, they

did not lead to anything, and here are the latest showers of the fsbs, which were exposed by khristo groziv and belinket and the insider, show that the fsbs themselves admit that spending on rasha today is no longer effective, and no one accepts such blatant propaganda, so they begin to act in a different way, to mimic ukrainians, local ones. some activists and imitate the mass media, for example, create fake pages of fox news and thus try to influence the citizens of other countries, well, in the states they generally thought of creating simply millions of these advertising messages with the help of artificial intelligence, so that each , to influence each group of voters with with the messages that these voters can... push, that is, i am leading to the fact that it is not so much about money, but about innovations and approaches, and if the new

minister can find some innovative approach to promote ukrainian messages abroad, it was going to be good, well, it must be said that in fact no one tried to create since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, no one tried to unite all the journalists working in... ukraine and make of them some kind of strong fist in opposition to the russian occupier , that is, they will tell you about the telethon, why not, well, the telethon solves an internal problem that is quite serious, but i mean, well, there are enough people who could join this great propaganda in the good sense of the word and in some formats to work with is a big problem, that our government has spoiled relations with... ukrainians abroad, i have already talked about it once again, but i will repeat,

the problem still exists, we have refugees who have left, maybe russia is also influencing the split here, trying to quarrel those who went and those who remained, and this cannot be allowed, ukrainians who are abroad, they remain ukrainians, they leave ties with their homeland, they send money, they defend the ukrainian position abroad, they go to rallies, protests and call on the governments other countries to give weapons to ukraine, this work must be coordinated, and this is a possible joint work of both the ministry of foreign affairs and the mini-ministry of culture, and a third ministry may appear there, the ministry of the return of ukrainians, and this is also quite such an interesting story, and i'm not i rule out that kulebi may have been offered to head this ministry, because it actually is. will carry out part of the powers currently vested in the ministry of foreign affairs,

but i recognize mr. knyazhytskyi's proposal to create a ministry of demographic policy or a ministry of how to solve the demographic problem, it is a similar story, let's say with the return of ukrainians, i have more skepticism, why that, unfortunately, in a situation where the return of ukrainians depends on... many factors, security, economy, economy, housing and everything else, i.e. everything that our citizens who were forced to flee the war have now, but... when it comes to the ministry of return of ukrainians, well, not in the literal sense of return, ukrainians are already all over the world enough, that is , maybe this is the ministry of the diaspora or i don’t know, but the word ministry scares me the most in this story, but when i imagine that a whole bureaucratic machination will sit down, start stamping these

orders, how long will there be something else return, return, return ukrainians and... ukrainians no, no, they will not want to return themselves, well, we will create the preconditions there, we will conduct negotiations there to finally bring these ukrainians home, we have many such ministries under which there is actually no large developed infrastructure, even the ministry of strategic industry, despite such a big name , well, the first years of its existence, i remember, we analyzed the purchases of this ministry, they bought furniture, cars, that is , the activity of the ministry was to master... budgets for salaries and for furniture and by car, then, well, when komyshyn was already in charge of the ministry, and when the ministry was actually transferred to the ukroboronprom department, well , there was already some kind of movement, but to create a superstructure over ukrabronprom simply so that, well, you might have some additional voice in the government during the voting ,

ukraboronprom can itself be a ministry, well , it is a big one, it is the main asset and all that . so to create a new ministry, i constantly remember the words of viktor penzenyk, who was both the vice-prime minister and the minister of finance, the minister of economy, who said that if you do not want the country to have no apples, then create a ministry of apples, it is not always fair, it is clear that some ministries are needed, but why create them on every occasion, i think , that quite these ministries that already exist can deal with the return. just create conditions, create programs, work, because in fact there are no secrets here, people are afraid to return because bombs, rockets are falling, even in the west of the country, we have seen recently, the tragedy in lviv, and in poltava, that is, not even in the front-line territories,

we see what problems we have with education, the year has begun. and many children came to school and saw again that there are no normal shelters, no teachers, these elementary problems, if we solve safety and quality education, it will be easier if we also find money to support families, because many people simply have nowhere to return , there are no bombed-out houses or occupied territories where these people can settle, in other countries housing is provided, they are provided with furniture. they give money for clothes, for food, how can ukraine compete here? we need to watch, create special programs. regarding personnel rotations in the government, people's deputy of ukraine yaroslav zheleznyak urges not to look for logic in these personnel rotations. let's listen to what yaroslav zheleznyak said. this is a banal technical

replacement of some people in power, really. of the executive branch of government on other people of the same type who are from the executive branch of government, there is no logic in this, from the fact that the minister or his deputy will change business card, it seems to me that it is unlikely that anything in our system will change, with all due respect to them, i absolutely support it, there is nothing to say here, there is no logic in this, also because when i announced... about changes, it was still, as far as i can remember , when the general was changed, they said in february, and the president’s position was that we are not just changing the head, we will have extensive, major personnel changes, and well , 16 generals were fired then, well, i don’t know about all the generals, but it was about the fact that the government changes and everything changes, but we

we see that these changes have stretched for more than a year, that is, in words and actions... very often there is no unity, well, that is, if it was necessary to change some ministers and make qualitative changes in the work, then this should have been done immediately, that is, when he said in february, i don't like the work of this minister, this one, that one, and not to make a show out of this, that is, not to recruit this pool of nine ministers, to change them, and there are also a lot of questions about these ministers, like ulha stefanishyna there... colleagues write, yes, colleagues write about this anti-corruption, higher anti-corruption court, on october 3 this year , a case involving a new minister is being considered. justice, that is, it is nonsense in general and looks very, very bad. well, or the russian relatives of the minister of youth and sports, and matvyi bidnyi, because he is the son-in-law of dashutin

, a former people's deputy of ukraine from the party of regions, and he is accused of working for the russian federation in the interests of the russian federation, a military-industrial complexes of ukraine, and this is also a big issue, big challenges, well , that is, very much. logic i want to note when they removed the minister, when they removed the minister of infrastructure and regional policy, they said kubrakov first, so they said exactly that they would divide the ministry, and we see that it is not that they did not divide, they even added the ministry of reintegration iryna iryna veryshchuk, and it turns out that instead of separation of the ministry, since... well , it is impossible to simply manage only affairs , at the same time the minister simply did not pay attention to regional policy, was only engaged in infrastructure, or vice versa, only

regional policy, but not infrastructure was engaged in, here we need to dilute these flows, but we are promised to do it in two, three, four months, and i will remind you that they announced, well, they did not announce publicly, but they announced in the press that there will be a replacement of the head of the government, so here are the replacements the head of the government did not happen. and as colleagues say that in fact shmagal once again beat everyone and defended his seat, but agreed to internal changes, well, they say that he was defended by his arahamiya, davyd arakhamia, the head of the servant of the people faction, watching these endless divisions and unifications ministries for the past 30 years, i cannot understand the logic of this division. division, division, then reunification, then there were state secretaries, then there were many such things over the course of 30 years that

this system, in the end, does not work as we would like, as if ukrainians, voters, and as the president's office would like, it works, because it is very profitable when you have low-paid civil servants. there are few of them, they have many duties, and it is easy to fire them, and these people, well in fact, there are either good people who strive for stability and are afraid to take any initiative, or people who are dirty and manage everything, mostly not these people who are full-time employees, but a bunch of advisers, consultants on grant funds, by the way. . i want to say hello to all our foreign sponsors who support the civil service in such a strange way, when the money is not given for raising the salaries of civil servants, which would be logical, for some

additional positions that are not fixed in this civil service architecture. which are external ones, which are present today, will be gone tomorrow, they may be super pros, but all their development later goes with him. and we don't build this institutional memory in this way, it changes, the government changes, the sponsor that credits advisers and consultants changes, and all the hard work that has been done is lost. well, do you have the feeling that zelensky is in some kind of personnel capsule and, well, in isolation, you can say so, and he may not see in... everything or he does not see as it really is, exclusively through the prism these five or six managers, one of them suddenly resigned this week from the position of

deputy head of the office of the president of ukraine, but the same oleg tatarov, the same andriy yermak, the same, now iryna vereshchuk, who is returning there, that is, as far as the president in your opinion is already in the sixth year of the presidency, as far as he understands. what is happening, and what needs to be done in the state administration, i think that not only the president, but also the president's office itself, and the employees of the president's office are very often biased and are in such information bubble, as we are all surrounded by our friends in our social networks, we have some circle of communication, and we receive information that is not weighted, not balanced, but from these people, as well as the president, we remember the bigus-info investigation, when they ... they published analytical reports that are given to the president, transferred to the president's office, about what kind of criticism is shown on ukrainian tv channels, and all the negativity that was shown there,

it was written that it was all nonsense, the opposition, that is, even when it was not about political criticism, about objective criticism of affairs in the state, for some reason this analytical contour, which, by the way, is connected with one of the deputies of the servants of the people, she painted it as the tricks of the opposition, that is, any criticism in the office of the president is perceived in such a way as non-constructive, political, politically colored in the first place, and that is why they do not react to it, or even worse, it happens that they do the opposite, we see very often how journalists are already asking the president questions at a press conference, why you keep oleg tatarov in office, while that there are a lot of questions for him, and the president reacts to it quite emotionally, and as a result, it seems to me, the whole effect of his press conference, with these statements about tatar

, about tatarov is not... said things, but everyone remembered only about tatarov, who killed chechens in kyiv, it is still not clear what it was, the president's reaction was quite sharp, and it simply extinguished everything that was the main thing at this press conference. well, in principle, we will monitor how events will develop with those nominees who appointed and who... was appointed by the president of ukraine and the verkhovna rada voted, the only thing is that i listened to a stream today on the natali mysiychuk channel, where serhii leshchenko was talking about the fact that iryna vereshchuk is a super professional, and her return to the president's office is in fact, there is a promotion, he said, that is, from the position of vice prime minister and minister, the president's office. yes, a promotion,

but he said one thing there that absolutely answers why these appointments, because she was, starting on february 24, '22, right next to the president, i.e., she never left the office, and this loyalty and this sense of the elbow becomes decisive when determining who will be in which position, it seems obvious to me... that we need not just a government of national unity, we need a government of national salvation , in the situation that has developed today, in general, i am not only talking about the military, but also about the socio-economic situation, we see a budget deficit, we see problems that force us to raise taxes, and it would be a logical solution to create a technocratic a government of the best professionals that there are in this country, regardless of their political

views, but we see that... the logic of appointments is completely different, precisely because of the personal loyalty to the president and the lack of political ambitions in those who are appointed, and the fact that, the way it is communicated by serhii leshchenko and other agitators of the president, well , sometimes, it seems to me too like that, even too sweet, we remember serhii leshchenko as very sharp. investigative journalist in his time, and when he chose the path of being a politician, well, i hoped that he will also be a sharp debunker, a sharp critic, but with this president and with this government, he is their advocate, i hope not the devil's advocate, but sometimes his arguments, well... how

can you at least question them? friends, i would like to remind you that we are working live, we are conducting a survey throughout our broadcast and we are asking you about the following: do you expect the government's work to improve after the replacement of nine ministers? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have your own opinion, a separate opinion that goes beyond unequivocal answer, please write in the comments under this video. unfortunately, bohdan butkevich did not join our broadcast, although... although he was announced in this program, i immediately apologize to our viewers, well , if you watch us on tv, please vote on the numbers 0.800 211 381, if you expect an improvement in the work government after replacing nine ministers no 0.800 211 382 another thread is short enough but i hope it's in...