efforts of saudi arabia and other arab countries to provide humanitarian aid and contain the flow of refugees. at the same time, the expert notes that the war in sudan has an indirect effect on ukraine. we could tell the ukrainians to sudan, but again, any systemic crisis in africa, which provokes crises in other countries, increases the movement of migrants, increases the movement of refugees, that is , new migrants who want to work, and people who saved in the war, it strengthens the position. of the far right, destabilizes europe, and this increases the possibility of escalation and instability, that is, it will hit russia as well, there is no need to create illusions that russia is not affected by this, but at the same time, unfortunately, it does not add to our stability, in fact , it is common, it is sad, this is what, unfortunately , the developed world cannot pay enough attention and provide competent and adequate help to the sudanese people, that is, if ukraine ... needs help and in fact permission

to inflict the necessary damage on russia, then the students need help in dealing with two groups of fanatics who seek to seize military power in the country. even during the time of yevgeny prigozhin, russia placed several units of wagner's mercenaries on the territory of african countries. to some extent, western analysts say, the kremlin controls the situation in sudan, mali, and nigeria. however, how long the kremlin will maintain control over the three african countries remains a big question. moreover, this week beijing announced plans to invest at least us$50 billion in the next three years in african countries. dollars this means that beijing has

a long-term strategy to increase its presence on the african continent, which moscow does not. in addition, the daring and successful offensive of the armed forces of ukraine in the kursk region has already led to the fact that part of the units of russian mercenaries were withdrawn from africa and transferred to the territory of the kursk region. putin does not give up hope on the belarusian regime of lukashenka. this week, the authorities of this country announced increased attention to the border regions with ukraine. however, at the same time, lukashenko does completely opposite things. yes this week, the air force of belarus shot down russian shaheda attack drones that flew into the airspace of belarus for the second time this week. with this, lukashenko is sending a signal. certainty, in other words,

demonstrates to ukraine and the west that it is not worth considering him as a moscow protege until the end. this program was conducted for you by me, major of the armed forces of ukraine, taras berezovyts. thank you for being with us, thank you for watching, together to victory. glory to ukraine. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on air.

tv channel, west studio program, we will organize the most important events of this week, we will include the most competent and informed experts in our broadcast, of course, the key events of this week are major reshuffles in the cabinet of ministers and the situation at the front, but in addition we will also analyze the international so-called security dimensions. today's guests of zahid studio are oleg hrybachuk and glen grant. now the espresso tv channel will feature a retired colonel of the british army, a well-known military expert, glen. grant, godsave the king, glory to ukraine, dear mr. colonel. good safe the king, glory to the heroes. we understand that there are extremely many events, and all of them are extremely important, but we understand that the situation in the pokrovsky direction requires additional attention. yes, we understand that the enemy has made this a general direction for himself, although finally the direction of the great russian-ukrainian war, in particular in the donbass, has not become easier, i.e. such

a feeling that the enemy has thrown all his available resources in order to breach our defense . it is quite clear that russia will continue to advance in the east of ukraine and... it cannot be stopped at the moment, however, what is really important is that we, for our part , must maintain an integral line of defense, it is absolutely impossible to allow the formation of cauldrons, by the way, one of them is currently forming in the zoryanyi area, that is, we must be very be careful and keep the front line as straight as possible, as this allows us to commit fewer troops directly to the forward positions, as soon as the line of contact is distorted by large areas moving back and forth, more troops will need to be committed to counter to the russians, so we must keep the front line as straight as possible, even if it means losing a few forces with the priority of preserving our personnel. the problem in the east right now is that we don't have a long-term vision of how to get

the military to focus on the terrain they are defending. armies fight best when they own specific territory. if you look. last year, when a specific brigade was responsible for its area, it fought well and held its positions. however, how they have just begun to transfer them, they have to study the terrain anew. so it is worth remembering that tactics and terrain are not separate. tactics directly depend on the knowledge of the terrain, and if the soldiers are not familiar with it, there is no hope for significant success. it is extremely important that the troops remain. where they are, reinforced and strengthened in their current positions, unfortunately we don't, we move them back and forth like horses on a chess board, and that's not good, every time they are moved they have to learn a new one terrain, adapting your tactics, because

fighting in the field is not the same as fighting in the forest. there is a need to focus on established stability in the east, and that certainly means creating divisional headquarters. currently, the main headquarters are too far away and do not have proper communication with what is happening on the ground. the generals in the corps headquarters simply cannot effectively direct the battle because they are too far away, they are not aware of what is really happening on the battlefield. small infantry groups in large numbers, strengthened by artillery fire, sams and so on, plus aviation, and we understand that in principle. the enemy has prepared resources for this, at one time it was assumed that the enemy would try to strengthen the two main directorates, that is, for example, the pokrovsky direction and the north, in particular, when we are talking about the kharkiv region, but i have a personal feeling, i do not have relevant professional knowledge, but there is a feeling that

the ughledar direction will strengthen, this is the southeast of donetsk region, and accordingly, as far as i understand, the enemy would like to work in the so-called wide coverage, strengthening... on pokrovsk and opening and intensifying offensive actions in the south, is this generally possible considering the described tactics of russian small infantry groups plus artillery and plus aviation, so they are trying to save armored vehicles at the moment, this also indicates something , so we understand that all the dirtiest, bloodiest work should be done by russian infantrymen, who die literally by the thousands. you can always expect a helluva storm from russia, because they still have reserves, and what they are receive their armored vehicles, indicates their hope for a breakthrough, in order to quickly drive this vehicle to kyiv, this is their goal, and that is why they are waiting for

the moment when they can bring their armored vehicles forward and when they can no longer be stopped, and that's it but first of all there must be a breakthrough, so it is important to prevent it, not giving the enemy an opportunity. on his armored vehicle on our side of the battlefield. russia will try to act where, in their opinion, we are not ready. i hope that belarus has already got over this war. it seems that belarusians realize that they should be on the side of the west, and not on the side of russia. they already had many opportunities to fight for russia, but they did not do it. so it's fair to assume that the belarusian border is not where they 're going to attack, but they have... many other places from which they can strike, you see, russian doctrine is involved, which means that they will continue the pressure in the east, in particular in the pokrov direction, looking for where else to pull our reserves. the enemy knows that most of our reserves are on

midnight, and he will search, attacking somewhere else, then in another area. the russians are definitely preparing something similar. to be yourself. the initiative, which they lost, entered the kursk region to regain it, was opened. the territory of the russian federation, the enemy did not expect this, this was not expected, neither choigo, no one, they did not know, it was a made-up story, it was also a military one, because there was no proper viza, the enemy did not expect, they entered the territory of the region, and they are still going on. it's not just about certain people there, not about stupid people

and about certain strategic points, at one time according to my, so to speak, assumptions, there was a certain part of what is called the anti-missile continental defense system, and this is a painful blow for the russians. the breakthrough of the armed forces in the kursk region came as a surprise to everyone, and it is wonderful. it was only demonstrated that the operational security of the defense forces was at a high level. during the first few weeks, the initiative was on the side of the ukrainians, but now we are facing an increasingly strong russian defense. the operation can turn into another section of the defense line, if our troops cannot break through somewhere again. looking at the map, it is difficult to say where the greatest pressure in the kurdish direction is now, but we can be absolutely sure that russia is already preparing and will definitely carry it out. offensive, they will try to push our troops out of kurdistan, and then it will be a matter of resources,

in the next two or three weeks it will be unclear what will happen next, we cannot predict that, instead we can only watch, hope and believe that the armed forces of ukraine are ready for everything that russia will deploy against them, whether in the kurdish direction or in the east of ukraine, and yet the pressure from russia will remain, without a doubt. we are talking now about the simultaneous introduction of the pokrov operation of the defense plan and the offensive operation in the kursk direction, and you wrote an important article in which you insist on perspectives and the need to make some distinctions. authority, on the one hand, this is a very important signal, i would like you to explain now what you mean, so

what, command in the army assumes that there is one commander who will give instructions very clearly, and everyone will follow them and answer in case of their non-fulfillment, this is called army responsibility, on the other hand, we understand, the most brilliant commander, he needs a strong team, which he can trust which will be implemented. but mistakes can also happen, how do you think it would be right to strengthen the work of our same general staff? versatile questions, and some of them i did not reveal in my article. the main point that i expressed, is that the job of the chief of the general staff is not to fight. if he is fighting, then he cannot do anything else, that is, there are two separate types of duties that take place at the same time. one of them is to fight, and the other is to manage the defense, and now the defense management

is not properly performed. the problem is not how we fight, we know how to fight. some of the ukrainian brigades demonstrated world-class professionalism, given the resources available to them, no one could have done better, not just aces in battle, but when no one doesn't manage the defense properly, when nobody is making the system work, then the troops on the front are not getting enough support, because... that the system is not functioning properly, the commander's job is to make the system work, to ensure that the combat operations are properly supported and to make sure that everything in the system is functioning smoothly and he can't delegate those responsibilities to others, he can't delegate training or recruiting or any of these specific important tasks. his role is to make the system work, but he's not in the right place right now. syrsky is fighting and no one else is engaged in reorganization. perfecting the system, improving the efficiency of structures, he tries to do everything himself, and as a result

, the system does not work, and we see it, tck work, but not as it should be, no one manages them, and no one controls them, they just continue to exist , killing morale and doing things that are not useful to the country, the commander in chief needs to either step back and let his officers conduct the war properly by choosing the right commanders for it, or go. and become combative the commander, allowing someone else to be in charge of the general staff and the entire defense system, he cannot do both, the day has only 24 hours, if... syrsky, tearing between the pokrovsky and kursk directions, then this cannot continue, because this absurdity. you need two competent commanders. one is focused on kursk and is clearly determined to advance, and the other is on pokrovsk, aimed at holding positions in the east. currently there is no such thing. we don't have these commanders, because the boss tries to do everything himself, and it doesn't work.

the most gaps are in the defense system. i can count 30 numbers. things in the defense system that are not working properly, somebody has to take care of them, you can say that it is the job of the chief of staff, but i would say that the chief of staff should work to ensure that the system is working properly, not to act as a commander, a chief should focus on tasks such as amending laws, regularly informing the government and the president, and ensuring that rules and regulations are correct, which is about everything. currently, this... is not happening, we are still fighting with soviet doctrine, soviet rules and regulations, soviet practice and the soviet personnel system. if we do not change all this, then we will lose the war. someone has to become the real commander-in-chief and reform the system, while the conduct of hostilities should be entrusted

to someone else. this is what i want to convey in my article. yes, it's hard and tough, but it's real. known reality, because people in social networks everywhere and every day write about problems that need to be solved, if this do not do, then soon nothing will be left of the fighting spirit of the army, because the fighting spirit is the most important thing that we have in ukraine, without a high morale there will be no victory, dear mr. colonel, two years ago, yes, when the main idol and the main the military expert and the favorite expert of our... public was aristovych, who told fairy tales that people wanted to believe, so we talked about the fact that a long, protracted, very difficult war was promised, and we also understand that, unfortunately, but despite the optimistic cover many, so to speak, oracles who are engaged in commenting on this war, so you said that they do not promise to let

the enemy wear down, and now we have entered autumn, chu, bloody, extremely difficult autumn, right? and the enemy does not show fatigue, and the enemy shows a readiness to throw their soldiers at our lines of fire, that is, they throw meat in the literal sense, this is a question of resourcefulness, on the other hand, we understand the question of resourcefulness - it is a question of the correctness of the organization of this resource, and this is a question of additional blows, in particular in depth russian territory. we should focus on dealing damage to the army directly in front of us and not worry too much about countermeasures, but if we are going to strike deeper targets using the long range assets we already have then we should focus on because it affects the population, that is, it does not kill it, it actually has a negative effect. we are already

actively reducing russia's fuel reserves, which will affect the heating situation in winter, but we must... make sure that the effect will be long-lasting and that we are not just wasting effort on resources that they have in excess. we should pay attention to infrastructure damage that will really affect the daily lives of russians, such as sewage systems. we also have to focus on the main bridges, in cities like st. petersburg, where they simplify the routes for people, their destruction can make life difficult for people. next autumn will be difficult, because russia still has a lot. and it seems that they are not running out of them, they still manage to recruit 29-30 thousand soldiers every month, and although we can kill as many, they are still filling their ranks and moving forward. we cannot hope that things will get easier for us. this means we need to focus more on the front line. we cannot allow the current situation to wear us down. we should use the front line

more effectively. one of the problems is that if we keep moving our... troops they lose vital communication with the artillery, trust between the artillery and units is critical, if you keep moving units around they will not know the language of communication or tactics that prevent cooperation, so the focus must be on what we must do now, not what we would like to do or hope the us will allow us to do, our time must be spent fighting in that battle. in which we find ourselves today, and not in the one we would like to lead. if we don't focus as fall approaches, we will simply be pushed back. dear mr. colonel, i would just like to clarify. ot. the current activation of the enemy, in particular and on pokrovsk and in general on the donbass front line of the russian-ukrainian war, it is temporary, or will it still fit into some wider campaign, well

, in simple words, the enemy has now become extremely active on the ground, pokrovsk, ugledar and so on down the list, so they are waiting for the american elections, so afraid that a candidate who is not profitable for them will come, so to speak, or are they still just ready to keep a similar... pace as long as they have the strength, and there is a feeling that, well, they can drive their own until a certain period military in position. i think they will continue to move forward. the russian doctrine is very clear: use success. that is, if you succeed, you keep moving forward. you don't stop and direct everything you have where the success is. currently, this success is in donbas, so they continue to advance there. and will try not to distract the reserves deployed there, in light of this, they will increase fire support to donbas with more artillery and other resources,

because they believe that they are close to a breakthrough, and they really believe it, because every day they achieve certain successes. the russians will continue to move forward and will not stop suddenly. we must be ready for it. we have to anticipate their continuous advance and establish a line of defense and better positions. no, which we will be able to maintain. we must also be prepared for the fact that they will overcome kilometer after kilometer. fortunately, they are moving slowly, which gives us time to adjust our system. however, we do not use this time effectively we waste it by acting without considering the long-term consequences of our actions. if we want to win this war, we have to think about the long term. if we continue from enter without preparing to move forward, then retreating 50 or 100 km, we will face the same problems as today, we have to change the system, which i have already

mentioned several times. finally, putin both wants and fears increased mobilization in russia. will he go for it or not? currently another mobilization putin doesn't need it, he still gets by with his ridiculous money offers, and... always gets the amount of troops he needs to continue the battle. he may decide to use mobilization in case we break through and take kurdsk, which may be an excuse for that. but now it's not just that he doesn't need mobilization. i'm not sure he has the management system to handle the large influx of people. putin lost many of his officers, and those who knew their business well. therefore, the management of additional troops will be a difficult task. after all, the military will be trained by school teachers and it specialists, not experienced soldiers, because putin does not have enough trained

personnel to handle a larger volume of tasks than the one he is currently managing, so he will continue the current process as long as he can. thank you very much, mr. colonel, for this extremely important conversation on the air of the tv channel, i want to remind our tv viewers that now a colonel of the british ... americans, let's try everything first we will win by simply doing what is wrong and then finally doing something right. laughter, physical activity, sneezing. even during such a small load, urinary incontinence can make itself felt. feminost uuro helped me. thanks to the natural ingredients, feminost uro

helps restore control over urination. feminost uuro - urination under control. czech republic, ukraine, only on mego. the league of nations is waiting for the national team, where it is necessary to score maximum points. support our boys on september 10 at 9:45 p.m. exclusively on megogo. september discounts on lyudyaniki bronchialik 20% in pharmacies psylansky, bam and oskad. in september, there are 15% discounts on sudokrem in the pharmacies psylansky, bam and ochad. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of air time, two hours. of your time, i and my colleagues will talk about the most important thing, for two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front-line, component, serhii zurets, and what the world is like, yuriy fizer is already

in front of me, and it's time to talk about what. .. yuriy took place outside the borders of ukraine good evening, two hours to keep up with economic news, time to talk about money during the war, oleksandr morchavka, winter field and sports news, i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation, two hours in the company of favorite presenters, cultural news, alina chivchenina, our tv viewer is ready to tell good evening presenters, who for many have become as if one day is already next to me, i am ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us mr. mustafa. i congratulate you. good day events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast. a project for smart and caring people. espresso at dinner. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals, and russia is already on the verge of exhausting

its resources. topics that challenge... this is the question of trump's victory, what it is, an analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us, what else the russians can do, are they capable they use, let's say, the resources of the lukashenka army allied with them, vitaly portnikov and the guests of the project, read the explanation, accept my union, thank you, it was difficult, but i was just interested, but this is absolutely not true, they help to understand present and forecast. the future offered the united states to conclude a bilateral security agreement with us. a project for those who care and think. political club. every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. oleg rybachuk, former vice-prime minister for european issues, will be working on the tv channel now of integration, former head of viktor yushchenko's secretariat, co-founder of the movement. honestly, glory

to ukraine. no, i’m glad to see and hear you, well, let’s start our conversation, first of all , i would like to talk about the big reshuffles, reshuffles , furniture in our government. it is not known what will happen to them, but the key story is that prime minister denys shmyhal breathed a sigh of relief that nothing will fundamentally change with our government, well, glory to the heroes. here if just to make a basic analysis, when the president was explaining the need for all this chaotic movement of chairs in the government chamber, he said that new energy is needed, people are tired, and we should theoretically expect the appearance of some new energetic such officials. with new

strength, with new ones there, with new zeal, but all this is not happening, we are really analyzing which bed, from which corner was moved to which corner, well, so to speak, some beds were upgraded, becoming bunk beds, well, the key story, in us weakening the office, strengthening it, are these specific decisions of the same andriy yermak, well, for example, there is the vice prime minister. vereshchuk moved to the office at the level of yermak's deputy, or rather yermak's deputy. yes, social issues, well, first of all, this is a real promotion for her, because it must be honestly said that she had a ministry there, which was filled with unknown things and it is unknown what they did. she has a lot of energy there, what she doesn't lack is the energy and desire to become the minister of defense there, she has the education,

she has the past experience, and she doesn't get tired it's to demonstrate, but actually something else that would be visible from the point of view of ours there, i don't think it's known there at all, our partners in the european union or our western partners, because it's not there, but it's become more ermak, it's just that almost all commentators note that when we analyzed the footage earlier. changes, what the media looked at, yes, which group is pushing this person, is it akhmetov's group, is it from pinchuk, is it from kolomoisky, they were looking for some political connections, now in fact, all these groups converged in one person of yermak, and when analyzing personnel changes, literally because of one last name, an argument arises that this person is either from yermak's orbit, or close to yermak, or... this

person is supported by yermak, that's why we have it.