you come, if he is a manager, none of the representatives of the office of the president of ukraine make decisions, because they are managers, managers do not make decisions, they provide. so, there is one person who, until 2019, was engaged in anything but politics, and this person is in a situation where the question is whether this state will exist on the political map of the world tomorrow, or has disappeared as if it never existed and will become part of russia, one person makes all decisions in accordance with some to... reports and views offered by people who are not interested in a political career, and most importantly, not interested in a political career, because a minister should be interested in a successful political career, in how to find a dialogue with people, not with zelenskyi, but with citizens who will to vote for him later, because he is a politician, annalina burbak is not thinking about how to please olaf scholz, she is thinking... how to please the people who

will vote for the green party in the following years, that is, to be effective in the position of minister of foreign affairs in in the eyes of the people, not in the eyes of scholz, the german finance minister, lindner is thinking about how to be effective in the eyes of the free democrat voters, not in the eyes of scholz, if it turns out that they are trying to solve something with the chancellor, they are immediately punished, as it happened now. in the last regional elections in germany, and everyone says that this is their punishment for forgetting that they are politicians, ugh, so the names of ukrainian ministers do not matter, what matters is the effectiveness of decision-making, whether the decisions made in conditions of the absence of political life, no, because then it turns into a lottery, today you can make some decision, tomorrow you make some fatal decision that leads to the collapse of your own state and defeat. of your army,

can it be so? of course it can, because there are no competing opinions. in any democratic state, again, if we do not want to build russia or belarus here, and if we do, it is not clear why we are at war with russia, we can join it and calmly build together with it what we like yes if we don't want to build russia and belarus here, then we need a political life, which is why i always insisted on the need to create a government of national unity, because i know for sure that the ministers of this government, especially if they are statesmen, and we understand that in our national-democratic parties, unlike this party, which was molded, it is not known why it won the elections in 2019, it is the politicians themselves, or they are experts who are supported by statist political forces, thanks to which ukraine in general has three the decade exists, and has not disappeared a long time ago, as it was planned in moscow. you understand, if we did not have national-democratic political ... there would be neither independence in

the 90s, nor ukraine's survival during the kuchmiv period, there would be no national democrats, the kuchmiv oligarchs would have joined this unfortunate ukraine before the russian federation, even before putin, neither the maidan of 2004, nor the maidan of 2013-14, none of this would have happened, it would have been here a long time ago, well , if not russia in the full sense of the word, then belarus, and it would have been here a long time ago a russian would sit governor, and not a single word on television for a long time. no one would have spoken in the ukrainian language, and long ago the flag would have been red and blue, and not the one that you and i are now protecting together with the state, everything ended a long time ago, because the majority of the population would have watched it completely calmly, because she voted for pro-russian politicians, it would be so, and that is why i believed that the government of national unity is a guarantee that once again ukrainian society will not make a suicidal mistake in conditions where the survival of the state is

the main question for everyone, because now it is not just about the survival of the state, but about the fact that russia will undoubtedly destroy and expel the vast majority of ukrainians, and all those who watch television today will be looking for themselves, if they are not in their graves, what i am far from sure of, they will seek their fate in other worlds, in the conditions of the greatest migration, i would say, test in the history of europe in the 21st century, all this, can it all be, of course it can, you can't even imagine the scale . what can be, then why should we hope that the lottery will take us out, not take us out, the lottery has never taken anyone out, because in the lottery you can make a good decision, and you can make a bad one, if there are conditions of competition, if a person who is in the government is a minister the minister of defense, the minister of foreign affairs, the minister of the interior, the minister of finance, they understand that they have a political future, they can say no to the president, it is necessary to...

do otherwise, the government can say no to the president, the president can understand what the recommendations are government, to agree with them or not to agree, because there may be a situation where the right of the president is against the government. it was not like that either, and this is a competitive job, what is happening here, what should be the fate of all these people who left the government, some of them can only think that they will start a political career, but as a rule, such a thing never happens with the former ministers in our conditions don't happen like that, in our country, on the contrary, even politicians cease to be politicians after becoming ministers, and after that their rating is zero, well within the margin of error, and if... this is a manager, well, he will transfer, someone will transfer to work at some state company, or not state, private, i will consult, someone will be, maybe an ambassador somewhere, because now even diplomatic work has really turned into a theater in our country, someone else

will be someone else, it doesn't matter, that is, these people, when they are in ministerial offices, they think about anything but their political future. and i will repeat once again, thinking about the political future means thinking about people, not thinking about your political future is to think about one person, about volodymyr zelenskyi, which means that the citizens of ukraine should decide for themselves who their ministers should think about, about them or about zelenskyi, if i were now the minister of any affairs, from internal affairs to foreign, why should i think about citizens who will not vote for me, i am not a politician, i was invited to work for the president, if i do something that he does not like... my work will be blocked, i can be removed from office, my department will suffer, so of course i have to do it everything is possible and impossible to please this person, and that is why these people, they write, they speak, andriy sibiga clearly said that

working in the office of the president of ukraine is the best time of his life, for a person who becomes the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, these are very... important and necessary words in order to continue a career in these circumstances, yes, it is possible soviet words, or when andriy melnyk, former ambassador of germany and now in brazil, calls zelensky the best diplomat almost there 21st century, c public interview, this is absolutely soviet behavior of officials, i saw this only at the congresses of the communist party, when all interviews began with the words, what a genius leonid brezhnev is, but... again, i absolutely do not i do not blame sibiza, melnyk, or any other ukrainian officials, because they exist in a system where they depend exclusively on the approval of one person, they no longer depend on the ukrainian people at all, the ukrainian people have no influence on their

further punishment yeru, and they are officials, them they need to advance along the line, they need to work in embassies, be ministers, implement some of their ideas about how a ministry or an embassy should... work, without the favorable attitude of a single person, the president of ukraine and those managers who serve this person, as he himself says, it is impossible to do anything in the country, this is such a vertical of power, this is a super-presidential republic since 2019, which after 2022 got rid of another important regulator, who was, after all, who could in critical moments to replace the absence of politics, this is social... control, because people understand that it is not necessary to respond harshly to certain actions of the authorities, because it can also end in the collapse of the state and be in the hands of russia, and i'm sorry parliamentary control, whatever it was, they also got rid of, because they at least came and there was an hour

of questions to the government, at least the ministers sometimes reported, but it was also a fiction, listen, if, if people voted for ministers whose names they found out voting, you say, they did not report, they voted for the government in the 19th year, they are people whose surnames none of the voters who voted for them knew, they voted for ministers whose surnames they did not know at the time of voting ugh why control those you don't know i 'm sorry if you marry a person you don't know and you never see that person again even though she is considered your wife how will you control her and what report do you want to hear at the time of divorce, andrii, if it wasn't between you? communications, i , moreover, i think that some of the people's deputies do not even know the surnames of those whom they dismissed and whom they appointed, let's be frank, of course it sounds like that, but the main thing is that the president knows the surname, in this it is important for the system that the president knows his last name, because this is the tool

of power, well, unfortunately, we have what we have, and this is how the reshuffle took place in our government, if that is possible. call it a reshuffle, but we have a short break and will return to you live in literally two minutes, no switch czech republic ukraine is only for me, the national league is waiting for the national team, where it is necessary to collect maximum points. support our boys on september 10 at 21:45, exclusively on mego. in verezneva, there are discounts on sudokrem, 15% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. september discounts on zzilor 20%. in pharmacies you will find plantain and savings. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my

name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, frontline, component, serhii zgurets. but how do you live? it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to catch up on economic news, time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr sulks in the hood with me, and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters. about cultural news, alena chechenina, our art watcher, is ready to tell, good evening. the presenters, who have become like-for-like to many, are already in front of me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished studio guests. mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of crimea. vasyl zema's big broadcast,

a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening at espresso. verdict with serhiy rudenko, from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about... the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you you can express your opinion on a bad day with the help of a telephone survey, turn on and turn on, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, from tuesday to friday from 20 to 22. get closer to victory together with the central security service of the sbu, join one of the best special forces in the country. we are expanding and hiring. we invite civilian specialists of various fields.

experienced commanders will ensure your high-quality training and education. fill out the questionnaire and choose the direction where you can be most effective. we are waiting for you in the team of tssoa asbu. together we will write the history of victory. details on official. sbu pages. saturday political club, direct egter, we are coming back, and now we will talk about other topics that concern, in particular, our country, and of course, of course, europe, of course those political processes taking place in europe. and not only in europe, ah, we will talk about the situation

with turkey, yes, which consists of brics, which consists of the possible entry of this country into brics, and i think we will talk, probably about rammstein , yes, about those conclusions, because somehow we couldn't talk about it in the first one the part when we had security. bloc, however , i think we need to return to this and also speak, because it is important for our country and it is important for us to understand what kind of help we will get for ukraine, what political processes took place and are taking place there. let's probably start with romstein then, yes, mr. vitaly, another meeting was held, volodymyr arrived there. zelensky personally, which is also interesting by the way, because he usually does not

go there, not always the president, or rather, not even always, and the president does not go there, this representation is much lower, whether it is the minister of defense, or the minister of foreign affairs or others, or military leaders, but still , president zelenskyi came there, he made a statement, he made harsh words about putin, he... actually talked about missiles, about weapons that putin receives from the worst regimes in the world to kill children, and here i completely agree and cannot object. because it's absolutely true, about rammstein, what are the first results we 're seeing now, and yet, what do you think to wait after, whether we will receive increased aid, whether we finally receive a sufficient amount of air defense, whether our international partners, who very often nevertheless

slow down in many issues of aid to our country, will hear, at least after this, and one more thing: very important, president after ramstein , he flew to italy, and today, if i am not mistaken, he is participating in one of the forums there, the economic forum, and we know that italy also has its own position regarding, regarding missiles, regarding strikes on the territory of russia, mr. vitaly, whether please, well, i think so the most important thing, why the president took part in these in this summit at all, is that this is the first rapstein after the course operation, and in his vi'. at this meeting, zelenskyi emphasized kurdish operations, which is in principle an absolutely correct approach. why? because it was the kurdish operation that changed the political character of the war. we talk a lot about how it changed the security nature of war. and we say that in reality it is russia that occupies 27% of the territory of ukraine, and ukraine has taken control of several

districts in kursk oblast, it cannot be compared territorially. the gains of russia, the gains of ukraine, and you can agree with this, but at the same time you have to understand something else, that ukraine transferred the war to the sovereign territory of the russian federation, that before this kurdish operation, the war could be considered as taking place exclusively on the territory of ukraine, that is, a special military operation of the russians on our territory, and this is a real war, that is, the russian-ukrainian war, not in words, but in reality, and it was very important to see how it was perceived by... allies and it turned out that they take it calmly, because, well, just a few months ago, if you and i discussed the possibility of how the invasion of ukrainian troops into the sovereign territory of ukraine would be perceived by the west, we discussed that, probably, he would not like it very much, they would condemn , from the word of the judge, they will say that this is

absolutely unacceptable, that the war must take place exclusively on the territory of ukraine, that it cannot be fought on the territory of russia. to spread, to be afraid of the word suja, to be afraid of escalation, but not all of that happened, on the contrary, all leading western leaders said that the war could take place on the territory of russia, because this is exactly the territory from which the aggression against ukraine is carried out, well, maybe with the exception of donald trump, who began to scare with the third world war, but we know that the former american president has a specific position when it comes to russia, and it seems to me that we , too, could agree on this. make sure, this is one point so very important, another point is no less important, it is that western countries calmly accepted the fact that during this operation western weapons are used, they did not start saying that ukraine has its own weapons to be used in this war. no, no, they said, yes, it's normal, it's

their business, when our weapons come into their service, they can do whatever they want with them... and here, of course, a logical question arises, why with your military with machines you can do anything that will be replaced, but with missiles you can't, why with your combat vehicles you can do anything you want on the territory of russia, not ukraine, but you can't do that with missiles, this is a beautiful question, as far as i'm concerned, and it seems to me that everyone who was at ramstein's meeting heard this very question, even if it was not clearly expressed, and that , that was... the meeting of the president of ukraine with the secretary of defense of the united states lloyd moschin, this is also an important thing, because you understand, we are now talking about a short distance, this short distance, it is approximately from september 20024 to march 2025, this what can she do at this time

administration, and i think that president biden once dreamed that at the end of this ... his term of office there might at least be a suspension of the wars in ukraine in the middle east, now it's kind of not a lot to hope for that, maybe, although on the other hand, if we put himself in putin's place, maybe he would be better off agreeing to stop the war right now, when the expected biden is the clear course, and he doesn't know what to really expect either from trump or from khairis, ugh, but again in putin's head we live with you, fortunately, and in to this plan it may be ... some such short-term arrangement, what else can this administration allow to compel russia to peace, whether it will allow the use of its far. combat weapons, of course, now the americans say no, but i have no doubt that the situation can change, and most importantly, it can change not publicly. of course,

it is necessary that the nato allies agree. because zelensky is in italy, talking to prime minister giorgia meleni and other italian politicians. this is also important from this point view that italy is categorically against the use of its weapons for strikes on the territory. russia, and thus there is no unity among the leading nato member countries. well, in any case, we can clearly say that the situation is what it is, and that in ramstein it was possible to see about a simple thing, that the west in principle agreed to the possibility of using its weapons on the territory of the russian federation, that all subsequent packages weapons are discussed with this trend in mind, they are trends. and no one said that the way the kurdish operation took place, it cannot another bryansk or bilhorodsk will take place tomorrow. at least the russians should

think about it, should think that their borders can be breached with the help of modern western technology, which they very often have nothing to oppose, and accumulate forces on the border to prevent such a breach. i think that this is very important as a result of this kurdish operation, which you and i... always have to remember, is that the russians will now be forced to keep significant forces on the border with ukraine, which they did not keep, who is there was aware of the regions which soldiers, and now a strong army will be needed, which must prepare for the next breakthrough, this is an important thing, so in this regard , i think that rampstein showed it, showed it, and from the point of view of these dancing on the kurshchyna, showed that ukraine needs a new help to stop the offensive in... in the direction of pokrovsk, but it is no coincidence that just now reports began to appear that the russian advance is slowing down and that they may not

capture pokrovsk, but they would very much like to capture pokrovsk, we understand that, and not only from a strategic point of view, but also from from an economic point of view, because they believe that they will thus destroy all our metallurgy if they capture pokrovsk with its coking coal, so everything is very simple if we are talking about a visit vze'. whom to italy, i.e. ramstein, then italy, the economic forum, a meeting, it is clear with the prime minister giorgia meluni, what is the interest of ukraine in italy as of now, and we also see the position of italy, which is different from the position of other states , they say absolutely not. we are not allow us to strike with our weapons on the territory of russia, as far as i understand, in general, that is , we are not even talking about strikes, deep down, we are talking

about the fact that italy generally prohibits the use of its weapons outside the constitutional territory of ukraine. what is the interest of our state there, why is zelenskyi in italy today, and how can we convince italy to change its decision? i think we can't. to convince the italians to change their decision, one way or another we have to influence them, influence public opinion. ugh. in the end, this government will not always. well, george maloney does support ukraine, but her coalition consists of three parties, two of which are known for their long-standing ties to the kremlin. yes, now they have somewhat, i would say, changed their attitude, but we vividly remember the story of matteo salvini, giorgi melani's current partner in the coalition, and silvio berlusconi, who led the party until his death. which was headed, is now headed by the minister of foreign affairs of italy , alberto tajani, that they were constantly in moscow, they met with putin and others by russian politicians, berlusconi did not

hide his good relations with putin even after the beginning of the great russian-ukrainian war, this is such a coalition, i would say that we georgi melena are lucky that she plays the main violin in this coalition, because she won the elections with a much more obvious result than its coalition partners, and therefore its position under... ukraine is absolutely accepted for them, they cannot oppose anything not even to this position, but to the weight of the party of brothers of italy in the italian political system, but again, this italy, where everything can change, the right can be replaced by the left, and there will be a completely different situation, because as you understand, if the democratic party of italy is ready to support ukraine in the future, then... movement, five stars or whatever there were stars or seven stars, i'm sorry, i think that five

is so, because he. takes a position on the left spectrum, very similar to the position of the far-right italians, also from the same league, and if a democratic center-left government is formed there, then we will again have a coalition in which part of the coalition will for the support of ukraine, and some are against, so we need to talk with italian politicians, if we understand that the war is for a long time, and we will need support for a long time, maybe all this for ten years, then one way or another... we have to be there and influence this situation, that's all, but in any case italy, we have to understand, it is an important partner of ukraine, that is, we need to talk with italy and of course what to convince, convince and demonstrate that we are in no way, even despite the position of the italians is not, so to speak, in opposition to this country and understands... well, i think that allowing

the use of italian weapons on the territory of ukraine is already a big mistake, yes, no matter what, we need more weapons here too, if you take into account that the main military operations are taking place here, yes that this is an absolutely obvious thing, if we are still talking about italy, then we can also, i think, then talk about france, yes, if we are talking about what is happening... about the coalition negotiations, then in france, these coalition perepetias are also taking place, and these coalition ones chants are not in favor of the winners, yes, although the winners in principle, as such, are not like that, and there are no clear winners in the morning after the parliamentary elections, and in the end we are watching a stolen victory, at least that is what

the french say... the left they they are calling for protests, again france and protests, this is an equal sign, you can put it here. why did this happen? but because french president emmanuel macron appointed a new prime minister of the country, and it was headed by 70-year-old 73-year-old michel barnier, the oldest, the oldest prime minister in history. michel barnier himself is a former european commissioner, minister, senator, republican, supporter of a liberal economy and a strong and influential european union. well, mr. michel cannot be called such a leftist, so to speak. it is impossible to name, and that is why the situation usually turns out to be after the parliamentary

elections. the early parliamentary elections, in which the right from marie le pen's party could have won, the left won, and the de facto winner, as of now, can be called macron. well, again, it's very risky game, look at what macron is doing: the far-right wins the elections to the european parliament, they occupy an absolutely unprecedented number of french seats in the european parliament. macron dissolves the national. the assembly of france appoints early parliamentary elections, there is no need for this, the parliament could continue to work quietly, and it conducts these elections under the slogan of stopping the far-right, and people who want to stop the far-right in the second round of parliamentary voting vote for the party's candidates macron and for the left, for the socialists and for the representatives of the recalcitrant france party, who are simply withdrawing their candidates from the second

round of elections. one anti-ultra-right candidate won, an anti-ultra-right candidate, such solidarity, and thanks to this solidarity, the left and macron's party become the winners of this election, in first place is the left front, popular front, in second place is macron's party, in third place is only marine le pen, so right, even in third place, that's what the leftists obviously think is theirs now the position of prime minister. but the prime minister in france is appointed by the president. the only thing the parliament can do is express no confidence in michel barnier and his government. but now the following question arises. of course the left would like to do this because they feel they have been duped. but if marine le pen's party, which is far-right, and barnier, he is a moderate conservative. she will express no confidence in the barnier government.