can it help us put pressure on moscow regarding the future negotiation process between ukraine and russia? well, theoretically yes, in fact it is true, if we say that ukraine controls a certain russian territory, russia occupied a certain ukrainian territory, that is, theoretically it would be possible to talk about it, but i do not think that it is possible, in principle, under the current leadership of the kremlin, that is, i no... i think that putin is ready for such shameful negotiations for him, that is , to imagine that putin will agree to trade russian land publicly, well, what kind of the great emperor, that is, he is talking about the fact that ukraine has no right to exist in general, and there are some negotiations regarding the kurt region, of course, that putin will not go for it, i think, and now the situation in principle on the entire front is such that russia trying to break through

defense both in the pokrovsky direction, and in the chasovoy yar, and in the turkish direction, the ughledar direction, but the ukrainian troops are obviously seizing the initiative, that is , now it cannot be said that the russian offensive has already been stopped, or that the situation has been reversed, but obviously, the russians do not have enough reserves to not only attack in all the named directions, but without this, in principle, they cannot see success in donbas, they do not have enough resources and reserves. even in order to break through the ukrainian defenses in the pokrovsky direction, at the same time they have to do something with the kursk region, and obviously they have a plan, they promised, i mean the russian generals , to putin that they will sort out the skurd region by october 1st, so i can predict what russia will be at the moment nevertheless, more and more forces are being drawn into the kursk region, trying to show some results by october 1, that

is, it is possible that there will be counterattacks, perhaps some counteroffensive actions of the russians in the kursk region, this can be expected, but a competently constructed operation that resists, a ukrainian operation that relies on the seim river, for example, on geographical conditions, at the moment i do not see the prerequisites for the russians to somehow significantly change the situation in the kursk region, we will observe, to what extent they... will be able to strengthen their group in the kurt region with reserves, then it will be possible to talk about the further development of events. well, obviously, it will all depend on what kind of weapons will be in the armed forces of ukraine, because it is clear that the decision that the united states of america and great britain can make regarding strikes on the territory of the russian federation may or may not be their weapons not to be meanwhile, it became known about...

that ukraine has developed its own high-precision planing bomb, which can become a key a weapon for attacks on russian military facilities, forbes writes about this with reference to a video of a bomb test, which was published the other day by the air force of the armed forces of ukraine, this bomb is equipped with a rocket accelerator, retractable wings and a gps system, its flight range can reach 65 km. the publication notes the similarity of the bomb with the french french french hammer and predicts that if ukraine sets up the serial production of these bombs, it will be able to strike the territory of russia with the same frequency with which the armed forces of the russian federation are shelling ukraine with similar projectiles. this is good news, mr. mykhailo, the only question is to what extent ukraine can now fix the syrian situation. production of any weapon,

including this high-precision planning bomb, do we have these capacities, do we have these capabilities, most importantly, taking into account the constant strikes of the russian federation on the objects of the military-industrial complex of ukraine. i think there is no problem imposing the production of such bombs now, because technologically this product is not something there some kind of pinnacle of technological thought, it is not a ballistic missile that ukrainian engineers are working on, it is not other super -developed types of weapons, such types of weapons have been in service with various countries of the world for decades, so i think that ukraine has every opportunity to do it, in terms of production, production facilities, i don't think that again there is a problem to find underground ee workshops, underground, let's say, facilities where you can produce

such products, and so, well, again, the important thing here is that, it's an organization production, this the personal responsibility of the state officials who... head this program, we have one big problem, a fundamental one: we still do not have such a concept in the arms production system as the head of the state program for the production of arms, be it a ballistic missile, drones, or , for example, an aerial bomb, that is, there must be a clear system, a clear responsibility of a specific official for production, coordination, concentration of budgets, organization of just that. and so on, that is, if it is done, i do not see at all there are no problems in setting up mass production, such bastards. and oleksandr syrskyi, commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, stated in an interview with cnn that ukraine has narrowed the gap in the ratio of ammunition

with russia, which is now almost one to two. i will quote mr. asyrsky: the ratio is actually one to two, one to two and a half. a year ago, that figure was 1 in 10, one in six. we compensate for this difference with unmanned systems. does this mean, mr. michael, that the drone war that is going on now, in most regions of ukraine, by using unmanned systems, it changed the character of this war, because it started with one weapon, and this weapon is that. in armaments, russia had an advantage, and russia gave in to ukraine rather quickly, ukraine gained momentum and actually made the weapons that are now, in principle, the most used on the battlefield. there are two aspects here, indeed from the point of view

of drone-centricity of this war, it is obvious that drones are foreign, both air and sea, they have changed the nature of hostilities, the nature battlefields, here... there is no doubt that ukraine is the leader in this process, but in relation to the ratio of artillery, it is a slightly different process, remember, about a year ago , europe, the united states decided to finally invest in the production of ammunition, just then started implementation and national projects related to the expansion of opportunities and capacities for the production of ammunition, a czech initiative was born regarding procurement in third countries, not in... nato countries or the ramstein project, in third countries, which are often even anonymous, but for money from the allies of ukraine, and just a year later, in fact, all these initiatives began to bear fruit, by the way,

western production has not yet reached its peak or even its optimum, that is, we are now in such a situation that, in fact, there are already 80% of the implementation of projects to increase . the amount of ammunition production and the peak of these projects in the western countries will be released somewhere around the beginning of the 25th year, because a year ago, in the summer of the fall of the 23rd, this word at the beginning of the 25th year was perceived very, very negatively, since everyone said: well, what if we are going to fight without ammunition, in principle this is how it turned out, we remember how difficult it was... it was the 24th year, the first half of the 24th year, when there was a failure in terms of ammunition, a failure in the american help, that's why right now we are experiencing the implementation of those projects that were started a year ago, and in this way we are getting a ratio that is already more or less acceptable in the confrontation with russian

artillery. another important topic, mr. mykhailo, is air defense systems, which are so necessary for ukraine, and zelensky has already asked... italian prime minister giorgio meloni publicly announced to mediate in the negotiations with the united states of america on the transfer of the patriot air defense systems to ukraine, as reported by the italian publication messenger. according to the publication's sources , zelensky would like melonia, as the head of the g7, to push washington to transfer a significant number of patriots to the presidential elections in the united states of america by the end of the year. of course, everyone. patriot systems, we will not be able to close the ukrainian sky, those that are coming to us, in what other way is it possible avoid these strikes, missile strikes, constant, drone attacks, combined strikes, what ukraine should do and where

ukraine should move in order to do this, there was less and less. well, look, we are at the beginning of the conversation. you talked about iranian missiles, they are ballistic, ballistic missiles can be shot down by the patriot, well short-range, by the way, we would like those fateh 360 missiles that are flying there in eights. 50-100 km, an israeli iron dome would be good, again, we know that israel will not hand over these systems to us, regarding long-range ballistic missiles that iran can transfer, that north korea is transferring to russia, and russia has its iskanders, well, there is more patriot after all, and regarding whether ukraine can get a patriot to close the entire ukrainian territory, maybe, because the united states has there are enough of them on the continental united states, dozens of them. according to some data, even hundreds, well, let's say dozens, because we don't really know

the technical combat condition of these machines, of course, they are not all new, maybe even from the cold war, but they can to restore, it would have been possible to restore, after all, the war has been going on for the first day, and the united states could hand over to ukraine 25, for example, patriot complexes, which would, in principle, block the main ukrainian facilities. territory, and if we transferred even more, then we could safely ensure virtually guaranteed protection of ukrainian territory with a high probability of protecting ukrainian territory from russian ballistic missiles and not only. unfortunately, explain to me logically what arguments can be found why the united states ignores the transfers ukraine has patriot systems, which the armed forces of the united states do not need at all. i'm just emphasizing, they stand on the continent. part of the united states, with a range of 150 km, the territory

of the united states, neighbors, that is, canada and mexico, from whom the united states is going to defend itself, so it is not clear, this is a tactical system, this is an army system on the scale of the united states, they use for anti-missile defense, including ballistic, completely different systems, petrio is not even located there the nomenclature of these anti-missile systems, so ... i think the idea is to somehow, in any way, persuade biden, with the help of melons, with the help of any arguments, that the united states could transfer these systems to us , i think that they should be used now, for example, i even advocated such a project, transfer to europe, to european countries, for example, romania and poland, transfer 30 systems. they can then be restored and gradually transferred to ukraine, it would be better than just

talking about what romania is transferring to us there the single patriot air defense complex, or poland and romania should shoot down some aerial objects over ukrainian territory, well , you know it all, it's delaying, it's confusing the situation, we need concrete solutions right now, this second, not endless negotiations, right now 25 meters which are available, which are just sitting in wastelands in the united states and are of no use. thank you, mr. mykhailo, for the conversation, it was mykhailo samus, military expert, director of the new geopolitics research network. friends, we continue to work directly on the air of the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are now watching us there live. please subscribe to our pages and take part in our survey. today we ask you about this, do you think it is real. hostilities in ukraine already this fall, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have your own

separate opinion, please leave it in the comments under this video, if you are watching us on tv, take your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381, if you believe that the cessation of hostilities is real, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote, then we will be in touch with volodymyr tsibulko, political analyst, writer, national deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations, glory, glory to the heroes. mr. volodymyr, shmyhal's government was reorganized last week, the cabinet of ministers has already renamed the ministry of culture and information policy at the ministry of culture and strategic communications, it was headed by mykola tochytskyi, ex. diplomat or diplomat, in addition, the ministry of development of communities, territories and infrastructure has been renamed

the ministry of development of communities and territories, that is, it was first divided, then brought together, now it is divided again, brought together again, with what and what fundamentally distinguishes the current government and the current one structure from what we had before the beginning of september 2024, well, first of all, what unites them? some government officials are appointed illegal as well as the absence of a government program. we do not know what this government is working for, whether it is working for victory or whether it is working for defeat. he does not report to society, he does not inform society about his intentions, but now how is he different, what is different is that during the american elections we will have a transition period, uh, that is, relatively speaking, a period of irresponsibility, and it will last

as at least until the end of the american elections, then, given the uh... the candidate chosen by the american voters, the authorities will have to adapt very quickly to the program of the new president of the united states, well, and accordingly, most likely to look for some forms of survival, most likely because we all somewhere so conditionally count on the fact that there are reasons for continuing. a war on the part of russia with the election of a new president will not happen either, that is, it will be exhausted, since the united states cannot afford to play in such a situation of strategic uncertainty, they will most likely do everything so that ukraine quickly finds itself in the european union and nato , and nothing to russia

there is no other, that is, there will be no choice, except for... ukrainian territory, otherwise russia will never get out of the system of sanctions, i want to remind you that jackson venick's law, which is a ban, which was adopted due to the ban by the soviet union, for the departure of jews, it still exists in one form or another, well, now for russia it exists in russia, they know very well that the american sanctions are for a long time and... they are starting to behave more or less according to the rules of world coexistence, or they will exhaust their resources to the last. mr. volodymyr, obviously, how the world will perceive ukraine will now depend on the ministry of culture and strategic communications, because earlier it was the ministry of culture and information

policy, and this information policy was reduced to the formation of a single one over the past 2.5 years. mararan of the unified information space, if now we are talking about strategic communications, a diplomat comes there, obviously, this ministry will be entrusted with the external, foreign and informational work of ukraine. by the way, before being appointed as the minister of culture and of strategic communications tochytsky emphasized that the preservation of cultural identity in ukraine requires the support of foreign partners, according to him, the government should develop an effective system of strategic communications. let's listen to tochytskyi's vision of what the ministry of culture should be as a strategist. our struggle on the front lines and the preservation of our cultural identity require increased support from our foreign partners.

international aid depends not least on time. changing the motives and goals of our struggle, it is necessary to communicate them qualitatively to our friends so that they know who we are, what we are for and why we are here. today, it is very important to think in terms of what culture can do to ensure that the issue of ukraine remains on the agenda. information policy is the main component, it is important for... this is a matter of national security. we must build an effective system of strategic communications. yevgenia kravchuk, deputy head of the parliamentary committee on humanitarian and information policy, says that mykola tochytskyi is a professional diplomat, very experienced a specialist who was engaged, in particular, in cultural diplomacy. i see further strengthening of the ministry, specifically in international work in

broadcasting ukrainian narratives abroad. why, mr. volodymyr, so... until now there was no talk of these strategic communications, and now even in the president's office dmytro lytvyn, an adviser on strategic communications, who until now was zelensky's speechwriter, has appeared, that is, communications are already at such a high level in ukraine, on strategic communication, what does it mean? in general, i want to remind you that everything is personnel rotation - this is such a cover. from public responsibility, that is, as long as the new appointees enter the working stream, no one will ask anything from the government, that is, it is somewhere... well , a vacation for two months, so that society does not attack the newly appointed ministers, when minister tochytskyi spoke about the fact that

the marathon is very useful, i fell out of my underwear, i realized that it is hopeless, that it is, so to speak, how shriveled, cemented in some kind of frame the official diplomat, who, he simply does not think in terms of communication categories, first of all... communications like as a rule, in order for them to be effective, the state outsources it, because where an official deals with communications, there is always a lack of creativity, there is always clumsiness and schematism, for me the shock was the story of how ukraine and the official lost the information battle, in including tochytskyi, because he worked at the bank at the time when the occupying forces blew up. povska hpp it was a tragedy on which you could build a simply unique informative strategy, and on this build a, well, broad coalition

support of ukraine. moreover, use, for example, left-wing movements, because this is an ecological disaster. and the left-wing movements could be well tightened so that they, well, are also included in the environmental agenda somewhere. in the black sea, in the azov sea, in the caspian sea, because the russian troops destroyed tens of thousands of dolphins there, in the caspian sea of ​​caspian seals, this is a problem on which a new alliance with ukraine should be built, an alliance of such environmental movements, well, probably the left is not needed shun, but instead we see that in essence tochytskyi clearly attached to the ministry , to be honest, i was even scared at a certain moment that culture had disappeared from the name of the ministry, but then it turned out that

what was saved for the name in the name of the ministry of culture and strategic communications, because the first days with well, and when there was talk about the appointment of tochitskyi, it was only about strategic communications, i am not sure, he is... in his diplomatic positions, tochitskyi was probably not the worst specialist, but this is a completely new field, and in it, if he will act, then as part of the strategy mykhailo podoliak, and we know for sure that all these strategies are losing, the bank will lose, especially international platforms and returning to these international platforms is already in sight, well, with zelenskyi. in the form of such an information ram, it is already impossible, lost time, and it is impossible to make up for this time. tell me, is it clear to you why

denys shmyhal was not dismissed, or is this the second act of this play, which will obviously take place sometime in november or december? well, the fact is that the resignation of the minister is, well, a reboot of the entire government. and what about them its. they are afraid because there is no majority in the parliament. we see one important thing: 226 representatives of the people's servants did not vote for any of the newly appointed ministers. 190, well, about 195 votes, that is, there is no monomajority in the parliament. but what is the new government? a coalition must be formed under the new government, because there is no majority. votes, but to make a coalition with these scumbags, opz, that, well,

that is, they actually made such a coalition, it is clear that without declarations, but in order to create a new government, it will be necessary a formal coalition, it will be necessary to vote for each minister, to find votes, and for that, let me remind you that... that a simple majority does not work, for that a coalition will have to be created, and a coalition can be created only by factions, not deputy groups, factions of parties of regions or opzzh no longer exists, it is divided into parliamentary groups, the voice faction is unlikely to be fully included in the coalition, well, unless the homeland, but if the homeland enters into a coalition with a servant, it will... well , it will bury its, well, small trust society, which is still left, and even then, this trust does not guarantee the re-election of the servant

of the people party. oh, the fatherland party in the parliament of the next convocation, and for, for example, a union with european solidarity will have to enter not just into difficult negotiations to create a coalition, but european solidarity, which has a unique experience of creating coalitions, that is, then in the format of petro poroshenko's block in the previous convocations, this is precisely where european solidarity will twist the hands of the majority. well, that is, within the framework of the coalition, i will serve the people as necessary to renounce the status of the youth party of the party of regions, the party of the servant of the people. very short question, and i hope for a very short answer. tonight will be the first debate between kamala harris and donald trump. by the way, the espresso tv channel will broadcast these tv debates live. what do you expect from

the first tv debate of the two? candidates for the presidency of the united states of america? well, the fact is that kamala garis has not participated in a similar format in a similar debate, and this will be a new test for her. well, she, she has public experience of public policy, a lot good, she has experience in conducting cases in courts, so i hope that this will be a victory for her, this debate will be a victory. thank you, it was volodymyr tsibulko, fly... expert, thank you, mr. volodymyr, i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct a poll, we ask you about this, whether you consider a real cessation of hostilities already this fall, so let's look at the interim survey results: 16% yes, 84% - no. in september there are discounts on amiksin ic. 10% at podorozhnyk vam and oschad pharmacies. there are in march discounts on fairveks. 20% in pharmacies. traveller,

bam and savings. in september, there are discounts on relief, 10% in podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations, friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have huge arsenals, and russia already has them. on the approach to exhausting the resources of the topic that resonates in our society, this is the question of trump's victory, what is it? analysis of processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do? are they able to use, say, the resources of the lukashenka army allied with them there. vitaly portnikov and the guests of the project, read the entire service, accept my speech, thank you, it was difficult, but i was just interested, but it was

absolutely not. understand the present and predict the future suggested that the united states conclude a bilateral security agreement with us. a project for those who care and think. politclub every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives. news, of course. the tape reports on them, however, it is not enough to know what is happening, it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly evaluate the events, analyze them, modeling our future. every saturday at 1:10 p.m. with a repeat at 2:00 a.m. studio event with anton borkovsky at espresso. get closer to victory, together with the central security service, the sbu. join one of

the best. from the subdivisions of the country. we are expanding and hiring. we invite civilian specialists of various fields. experienced commanders will ensure your high-quality training and education. fill out the form and choose direction where you can be most effective. we are waiting for you in the team of tssoa asbu. together. let's write a story of victory. details on the official pages of the sbu. we are servicemen of the griga separate unit, named after volodymyr griga, of the unmanned aviation complexes of the 76th separate battalion of the 102nd separate brigade. in the zaporozhye direction , combat clashes occur daily due to constant assaults.