continued to work, do you have a plan, i asked you, well, i don't have a plan, because i'm not president yet, but if i become president, we will think about such a plan, and this plan will be cheaper, and it will have different options , and you 're going to hear about it, not long, soon, or madam vice president, you know that congressman sanders...proposed to get rid of the middleman and private insurance and leave only public insurance, do you support it? well you know what i want to say i will answer your question now but i want to respond to what my opponent said, especially regarding fracking and taking guns away from people, first of all, stop lying because i own a gun myself. and i

'm not going to do that, as far as the health care plan that's available to the people, let's understand, 60 times he tried to get rid of that plan, 60 times, i was a senator at the time, and i'll never forget when on the beginning of the working day, in the morning we always had to vote, and the honorable john mccain, who at that time still... lived and worked, he made you think about what you were doing and you disgraced him even though he was an american hero and he said no you won't vote on it no you won't put it to a vote because you can't repeal it , that means if we repeal it, these people will not get any care, medical care, if they have the virus.

strengthen this health care system, even you, the american people, you've seen what i'm doing, he said he's going to make medical drugs so that they don't... he didn't, but we did, we made it so that older people, pensioners, don't pay more than a certain amount of money for medicine, and i will continue to work on that, i believe that health care should be a right, and not a privilege, and this plan should be to strengthen this affordable health care plan, not what president phraim is proposing, i want to... move on to the next discussion, the next

question, and i want to give the answer is that congressman mccain has defended for four years, first, you know what, i want to say that we can do a lot better, and she doesn't want to let private health insurance be implemented, have people pay privately for their insurance, they a... they want everyone to depend on public insurance, to have you wait six months for surgery, thank you president trump, we have other questions to ask the answer, especially what is interesting to the younger generation of voters, questions about the environment, ecology, clean water, we said, mr. vice president, what will you fight for,

environmental protection, first of all, i want to tell you that president trump wants to always tell everyone that all these fears about what is being done to the environment are all made up, that it's all just an illusion, there are a lot of people out there who don't know where to run, where to go, where to hide from that , what's happening in the environment, we've put trillions of dollars into clean energy, and we 've created manufacturing jobs at historic levels to invest money in industries that help to create clean energy. enterprises,

we create jobs, he lost jobs places, we know that in order to build a clean economy. and for these products to be made in america, it can all be done, we can open up the auto plants instead of closing them down like the previous president did, they cut 10,000 jobs by the way, they're building big auto plants in mexico, many of these places own these factories china. there they will make cars and sell them in america, and it is precisely because those people did it, they serve, they pander to the chinese, they cannot come into our country, we have to put big tariffs on it, and whether the cars are made in

detroit or in north or south carolina, what they have done to business and manufacturing in our country is terrible, they have nothing to show for it. what they did, biden especially cannot do it because china, hundreds of millions of dollars, they have this money, from ukraine or to ukraine, why do you support ukraine, why are you so loyal to ukraine, or china or others, or to the mayor, the wife of the mayor of moscow, or something else, because this administration is distorted, she abnormal and she can't do what she needs to do, and that was a historic event in the presidential debate, and we 're done with that.

on the air, espresso said that iran is likely. handed russia about 200 missiles with a range of more than 80 km, let's hear what he said. when there was the last interaction regarding the transfer of iranian missiles, it was about such parameters as 200 units. but again , these missiles are not the same missiles with a range

of 300 km that are currently on the screen, they are smaller, that is, for example, the armanovo bel has a range of 800 km, she actually. more similar to the jemelers rocket in terms of its, shall we say, capabilities. mr. mykhailo, how does the supply of iranian ballistic missiles to the russian federation change the nature of the russian-ukrainian war and does it change the nature of the russian-ukrainian war? well, in fact, here i would still call more geopolitical consequences, since the first deliveries of iranian missiles are a test, a check... of the international reaction, how will the united states, the european union, great britain, the un, other organizations, sanctions for iran no longer means anything, it unequivocally, and therefore, after the delivery of the fatih 360, which really has a range there of 80, 100-120 km,

the delivery of other missiles may follow, which will already have a more operational significance, that is, these missiles are still more tactically operational. significance, and they will affect the combat zone and the border, front-line zone, where russia will be able to strike on ukrainian territory, on ukrainian troops, on critical infrastructure facilities , and so on, but these will be limited strikes, limited effect, if they will continue to transmit, the world community will not will not be able to influence iran and russia in any way, then this will mean that russia will receive, in addition to north korean ballistic missiles, which they... use to hit ukrainian territory, and in terms of range, they are approximately equivalent to the iskander in terms of power, and iran can also significantly strengthen russia's missile potential even in conditions when russian resources cannot allow the mass release of missiles,

i.e. they cannot increase to the volume when they could actually deliver massive ballistic strikes rockets, such a development events it means that the world community is again failing the exam to control the situation, well, it's the same as when putin went to mongolia and demonstrated that in fact the international ... the court can do nothing, the un can do nothing, and international law now already actually destroyed, the same and iran and russia are now demonstrating that no regimes have restrictions on the supply of missile technology, in principle hints at nuclear technology, which i am sure are being transferred to iran and the north korea now, by the way, iran is a lot it has already been reported several times, is on the verge of receiving food. weapons, i do not rule out that iran already has these nuclear weapons, and such an increase in military-technical

cooperation between russia and iran can have truly global consequences, i am not talking about the consequences for ukraine, which will be forced to feel all these shortcomings. let's say , the international system. is it possible, mr. mykhailo, that this situation will encourage our western partners to make the long- awaited decision in ukraine. the decision to allow strikes by western weapons on russian territory federation? we would like to believe, we know that it all depends on the opinion or the position of the united states, in the united states actually on one person, this is president biden, who is actually already at the final stage of his political career, but he, again , like the entire biden administration, are actually now hostages of the election campaign. of the harries company, which obviously, i mean, not even kamala herself, but her political technologists

would obviously like to push the ukrainian topic away, push it into a state so that it, in general, this the topic was not mentioned somewhere, because for some reason they think that the president, the candidate for the presidency , trump can somehow use it against kamala and lower her rating, so i think that the only chance actually... remains, this is the emotional decision of president biden, already the last decision is strong, which may go against the political technologists of kamala harris, maybe it will theoretically cause some damage, although, in fact, i do not understand how this decision can harm harris' rating, this decision can be adopted during a personal meeting, possibly the last one in a while biden's presidency meeting the president. zelenskyi and biden in the united states,

which may take place during the session of the un general assembly, and here it can be so emotional, biden can, for example, due to the fact that zelenskyi will give appropriate arguments, allow ukraine to strike on russian territory, and if there will be biden's approval of the united states, then of course everyone else will follow. that is, there are currently no such outspoken opponents who would not allow their weapons to strike on russian territory, except for the united states, which are setting the tone here, and in fact for the united states, our other allies dare not allow it. it is possible that this issue will be discussed at the end of this week in kyiv, because the secretary of state of the united states of america, anthony blinken, is coming to kyiv. and the head of the british foreign ministry, david lammy, the purpose of the visit has not yet been announced, but

it will obviously include the expansion of the capabilities of the armed forces of ukraine in strikes on the territory of the russian federation. we will wait and see what the decisions will be and what the statements will be. at that time, we see how the russians are trying to put pressure on donetsk region, mr. mykhailo, and... we see how we are trying to put pressure on the russians in the kurdish direction, how would you characterize the situation in these two directions now, and can we use the kurdish operation of the armed forces of ukraine as an argument in this situation , whether it can help us in putting pressure on moscow regarding the future. of the speech process between ukraine and russia, well, theoretically yes, in fact

it is true, if we say that ukraine controls a certain russian territory, russia occupied a certain ukrainian territory, that is, theoretically one could talk about it, but i do not think that it is possible, in principle, under the current leadership of the kremlin, that is, i do not think that putin is ready for such shameful negotiations for him, that is, to imagine that putin will agree to trade... russian land for everyone, well, what a great emperor this is, that is, he is talking about the fact that ukraine has no right to exist in general, and there are some negotiations regarding the kurdish region, of course... putin won't go for it, i think, and now the situation is in principle on everything the front is such that russia is trying to break through the ukrainian defenses both in the pokrovsky direction, and in the chasvoy era, and in the turkish direction, the ughledar direction, but the ukrainian troops are obviously seizing the initiative, that is, now it cannot be said that the russian offensive has already been stopped, or that the situation

has been reversed, but it is obvious that the russians do not have enough reserves not to... just to advance in all the named directions, without this, in principle, they cannot see success in donbas, they there are not enough resources and reserves, even to break the ukrainian one defense in the pokrov direction, at the same time they need to do something with the kurdistan region, and obviously they have a plan, they promised, i mean the russian generals, to putin that they will deal with the kurdistan region by october 1st, so i can predict that on the present moment... russia will, after all , pull more and more forces into the kursk region, still trying to show some result by october 1, that is , it is possible that there will be counterattacks, possibly some counteroffensive actions of the russians in kursk oblast, this can be expected, but

at the moment i do not see a well-constructed operation that relies on ukrainian, which operation relies on the seym river, for example, on geographical conditions. those prerequisites, so that the russians could somehow significantly change the situation in the kursk region, we will observe how much they will be able to strengthen their grouping in the kursk region with reserves, then we will be able to talk about the further development of events. well, obviously, it will all depend on what weapons will be in the armed forces of ukraine, because it is clear that a decision that the united states of america can make. great britain regarding strikes on the territory of the russian federation with their weapons, it may or may not be. meanwhile , it became known that ukraine has developed its own high-precision planning bomb, which can become a key weapon for strikes against russian military facilities. forbes writes about this with reference to a video

of a bomb test, which was published a few days ago by the air force of the armed forces of ukraine. this bomb is equipped with a missile. accelerator, retractable wings and gps system, its flight range can reach 65 km. the publication notes the similarity of the bomb with the french, french hamme, french hammer and predicts that if ukraine sets up serial production of these bombs, it will be able to strike the territory of russia with the same frequency with which the armed forces of the russian federation fire ukraine similar. projectiles, this is good news, mr. mykhailo, the only question is to what extent ukraine can now establish the serial production of any weapon, including this high-precision planning bomb, whether do we have these capacities, do we have these capabilities, the main thing, taking into account the constant attacks of the russian

federation on the objects of the military-industrial complex of ukraine. i think there is no problem. to recall now the production of just such bombs, because technologically this product is not some kind of peak of technological thought, it is not a ballistic missile that ukrainian engineers are working on, it is not other super-developed types of weapons, such types of weapons are already in the service of various countries world for decades, so i i think that ukraine has every opportunity to do this, in terms of production... production capacity, i don't think that again there is a problem to find underground, workshops, underground, let's say, capacity where you can produce such products, and so, well , again, it is important here that, this is the organization of production, this is the personal responsibility of the state officials who lead this program, we have

one big problem, fundamental, we still have in the arms production system. there is no such thing as the head of the state programs for the production of weapons, whether it is a ballistic missile, drones, or , for example, an aerial bomb, that is, there must be a clear system, a clear responsibility of a specific official for production, coordination, concentration of budgets, organization of production and so on, that is, if it will be done, i see no problem at all in mass debugging. and oleksandr syrskyi, commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, in an interview with cnn stated that ukraine has narrowed the gap in the ratio ammunition with russia, which is now almost 1/2, to quote mr. syrsky, the ratio is actually 1/2, 1/2, a year ago this figure was 1

to 10, one to six, we make up this difference with unmanned systems, does that mean sir mykhailo, the war of drones, which is currently going on in most regions of ukraine with the use of unmanned systems, er... it has changed the nature of this war, because it started with a single weapon, and this weapons, russia had an advantage in this weaponry, and russia quickly conceded to ukraine, ukraine gained momentum and and really made the weapon that is now basically the most used on the battlefield, well there are two aspects here, really from the point of view of the drone. centrality of this war, it is obvious that drones, both ground, air, and sea, they have changed the nature of hostilities, the nature of the battlefield, there is no doubt

that ukraine is the leader in this process, but in relation to the ratio of artillery, it is a little another process, remember, a year ago about europe, the united states decided to finally invest in the production of ammunition, just right then the implementation of national projects related to expansion also began. opportunities and capacities for the production of ammunition, a czech initiative was born regarding procurement in third countries, not in nato countries or the ramstein project, in third countries, which are often even anonymous, but for the money of the allies of ukraine, and just a year later, in fact, all these initiatives have begun to bear fruit, by the way, western, western production has not yet reached its peak or... even its optimum, that is, we are now in in fact, there is already 80% implementation of projects, an increase in the production

of ammunition, and the peak of these projects in western countries will be reached somewhere around the beginning of the 25th year, because a year ago, in the summer of the fall of the 23rd, this is the word at the beginning of the 25th of the year, well, it was perceived very, very badly. negatively, since, well, everyone said, well, what if we will fight without ammunition, in principle, that's how it turned out, we remember how difficult the 24th year was, the first half of the 24th year, when there was a failure in terms of ammunition, a failure in american help, so right now we are experiencing the implementation of those projects that were started a year ago, and in this way we are getting a ratio that is already more or less acceptable in the confrontation with russian artillery, another important one... the topic, mr. mykhailo, is air defense systems, which are so necessary for ukraine, and zelensky has already publicly asked italian prime minister giorgio meloni to

mediate in negotiations with the united states of america on the transfer of patriot air defense systems to ukraine, and this is reported by the italian publication messenger. according to sources edition, zelensky would like maloney, as the head of the big seven, by the end of the year to prompted washington to transfer a significant number of patriots to the presidential election in the united states of america. of course, we will not be able to close the ukrainian sky with all the patriot systems, those that come to us, in what way can we still avoid these strikes, missile strikes, constant, drone attacks, combined strikes, what should ukraine do and where should it move . ukraine , in order to do this, was less and less, well , look, we talked about at the beginning of the conversation

iranian missiles, they are ballistic, ballistic missiles can be shot down by the patriot, well short -range, by the way, we would like those fateh 360 missiles that fly there at 80-100 km, the israeli iron dome would be good, again, we know , that israel will not transfer these systems to us, but... regarding the long-range ballistic missiles that iran can transfer, which the north korea is handed over to russia, and russia has its iskanders, well, there are still more patriots here, and regarding whether ukraine can get patriots to close all ukrainian territory? maybe because in the united states there are enough of them on the continental part of the united states, dozens of them, according to some data even hundreds, well, let's say dozens, because we don't know the actual technical combat condition of these machines, they... of course, not all of them are there new ones, maybe even from the cold war, but they can be restored, it is possible, it would have been possible to restore them, after all, the war is not the first day, and...

the united states could transfer to ukraine 25, for example, complexes patriot, which would in principle cover the main ukrainian facilities and territory, and if we transferred even more, then we could safely ensure virtually guaranteed protection of ukrainian territory with a high probability of protecting ukrainian territory from russian ballistic missiles and not only. unfortunately, explain to me logically what arguments can be found, why... the states ignore the transfers of the patriot system to ukraine, which the armed forces of the united states do not need at all, i will simply emphasize, they are located on the continental part of the united states, with a range of 150 km, maybe the territory of the united states states, neighbors, that is, canada and mexico, who the united states is going to defend against, so it's not clear, it's a tactical system, it's an army system on

the scale of the united states, they 're using. for anti-missile defense, including ballistic, completely different systems. the patriot isn't even in the nomenclature of those anti-missile systems there, so i think the idea is to somehow, in any way, convince biden with the melon, with whatever arguments the united states could give us these systems, i think they have use now i, for example, even advocated for such a project, transfer to europe, to european countries, for example, romania and poland, transfer 30 systems, they can then be restored and gradually transferred to ukraine, it would be better than just talking about the fact that romania there , the patriot air defense unit is handing over to us, or poland and romania are supposed to shoot down some aerial objects over ukrainian territory, well, you know all that, it's

procrastination, it's have fun situations, we need concrete solutions right now this second, not endless negotiations, straight up there are currently 25 patriots in stock that are just sitting in deserts in the united states and not doing any good. thank you, mr. mykhailo, for the conversation, it was mykhailo samus, military expert, director of the new geopolitics research network. friends, we continue to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms for... those who are currently watching us live there, please subscribe to our pages and also take part in our survey, today we you are asked about this, whether you consider the termination to be real hostilities in ukraine already this fall? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, if you have your own opinion, please leave it in the comments below this video, if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381 if you consider the cessation

of hostilities to be real, no 08'. 2011-382 all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we have volodymyr tsibulko, political analyst, writer, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. congratulations, glory, heroes, glory. mr. volodymyr, shmyhal's government was inaugurated last week. the cabinet of ministers has already renamed the ministry of culture and information. of politics into the ministry of culture and strategic communications, it was headed by mykola tochytskyi, a former diplomat or diplomat, in addition, the ministry of development of communities, territories and infrastructure was renamed the ministry of development of communities and territories, well, that is first they divided, then brought together, now they divide again, bring together again, what and what fundamentally distinguishes the current government from the current one.

structure from what we had before the beginning of september 2024. well, first of all, what unites them is that some of the government officials are appointed illegally, as well as the lack of a government program. we do not know what this government is working for, whether it is working for victory or it is working for defeat, it does not report to the public, it does not inform the public about its intentions. well, now, what, what is he cut off. differs in that we are in the period after the american elections, we will have a transition period, that is, conditionally speaking, a period without responsibility, and it will last at least until the end of the american elections, then, given the candidate chosen by the american voters, the authorities will have to

adjust very quickly. follow the program.