i encourage everyone to visit our beautiful tustan, and now we move on to the traditional sub-section of magnetic storms, and i want to say that today and tomorrow, if you have a severe headache or some such discomfort in your well-being, do not be surprised, do not be afraid, well, today strong magnetic storms are observed and tomorrow, as you can see, activation is expected at the end of the day, so that's if there are even any exacerbations. cardiovascular diseases, of course you should obviously consult with professional doctors, but it can be such effects increased geomagnetic activity of the earth, so please take care of yourself, without any excesses and keep some familiar medicines that you trust nearby. let's move on to the weather forecast, what is expected tomorrow in ukraine, and there is also news about instability, about a bad year. because tomorrow

the weather will be determined by a cyclone, which is located in the southwest of europe, so the weather will be changeable, accordingly, people who are meteorologists may feel uncomfortable, but let's start, we traditionally start from the western regions and now let's see what the weather will be like there tomorrow, well, as i said, rains, rains in places, thunderstorms are possible, the air temperature in the west is not very high, somewhere around 20, 23, 20, 24°, it is the maximum in the northern... part ukraine, we will finally wait for rain, i hope, and sometimes even with thunderstorms, and here the air temperature in the north will be higher, much higher than in the western part of ukraine, 26-28°. in the eastern part of ukraine, er, the temperature is similar to summer, well, it just corresponds to the summer period, although it is already autumn, 30-31°, there the probability of rain with thunderstorms, well, it is possible in most of the luhansk districts of the luhansk region without significant ones. precipitation, the central

part of ukraine will also be affected by a cyclone with atmospheric fronts, therefore, from vinnytsia to dnipropetrovsk region , rain is expected periodically, although there will be thunderstorms in places, carefully, carefully, 26.30 above zero. in the southern part of ukraine also, tomorrow, as in most regions, there is a fairly high probability of short-term rains, thunderstorms and high air temperature, as you can see, the rains will not greatly affect the temperature... regime +26 +31°, and in kyiv, the capital is also expected to rain tomorrow, with thunderstorms in places, but the maximum air temperature, as you can see, is very high up to +28°. on september 13, such unstable weather with periodic rains will still hold, but in the future, these doshas, ​​which we hope to see tomorrow, are almost the only ones in the near future, except for the western regions, so be careful. still and according to the updated

weather forecasts on the espresso channel. yes, well, there is some more news, well, how should i announce it, first of all, russia lost its lawsuit regarding the frozen assets in the european union, we are talking about 70 billion euros, this money will not be returned. well, there are details of why russia lost, but not about that, and also this trial in smila of a man who beat a 28-year-old man, who beat a veteran of the armed forces of ukraine, a 28-year-old suspect, taken into custody for 60 days without bail, the situation will be clarified, it happened in smila. well, thank you for being with us, it was a big broadcast on the espresso channel, goodbye until tomorrow at 6:10 pm, take care, good evening.

vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv, andriy smoliy and invited experts based on facts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events. if you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday politics club, every saturday on espresso. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already approached the serpent himself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live kamikaze drone attacks. political analytics. objectively and meaningfully. there is no political season. exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. freedom. frankly and impartially, you

draw your own conclusions.

this is a very important question because historically, presidential debates have not had much impact. in the minds of american voters, however , earlier this year we witnessed a decisive debate when joe biden faced off against donald trump in june. a debate that essentially ended biden's bid for the democratic nomination and paved the way for kamela harris. the current debate had a different dynamic. donald trump spoke out against a woman of another race for the first time. which we know can throw him off balance sometimes. during the debate , kamela harris had to stand up to trump without looking belligerent and showing unpresidential behavior.

admittedly, here in philadelphia, she managed to do just that. during the debate , the candidates exchanged... for example, kamela harris said that trump lied during the debate, and trump called harris a dangerous and not very smart woman. has this trend continued throughout the debate? yes, one of trump's most controversial remarks was his. comment that he didn't understand how kamala harris could be both indian and african, and he said it to her face, she handled it gracefully, not taking it as a personal attack, but rather expanding on the question

of how we embrace racial diversity in the us. she said voters don't want divisiveness or vicious racial debate. instead, she emphasized that america is a multicultural country. and people want to move beyond trump's views on race. what questions caused the most uncomfortable moments for both candidates? in particular, what about the topic of the war in ukraine? certainly not often seen. such an emphasis on foreign policy during presidential debates like this one. the focus is usually on domestic issues, because americans understandably care about issues like the economy, jobs and abortion rights. although these issues were discussed,

foreign policy, especially ukraine, took center stage. kamala harris directly challenged trump, saying that... european and nato leaders are concerned that if if trump was president, the war in ukraine would have ended with a quick victory for vladimir putin. she argued that trump cannot be trusted to negotiate with such authoritarian leaders, rather harsh words from kamela harris. i have seen several memes on social media and images.

does this mean she really thought trump was running away? and what do you think? maybe you noticed something? in the us, there is always a lot of discussion about the sign language of the candidates during the debates, it is not only about their words, but also about how they react physically. theirs behavior tells voters how effective a president they can be if elected. there was much discussion that harris remained calm and composed

despite trump's comments about her race and record. she even managed to turn the situation against him. one of the key points was inviting voters to attend one of trump's rallies, noting that people often get bored and leave early. this seems to have struck a chord with former president trump and prompted him to go on a little tirade about that immigrants in the united states eat pets. it was one of his not-so -best moments during the debate. so they both had the opportunity to demonstrate through their behavior how they react to each other. i know the rules for this presidential debate were the same as the june debate.

have you noticed any violations of the rules by this or that candidate? well, every campaign discusses the rules for each individual discussion, this time there was a lot of discussion about whether the microphones would be muted or whether they would work in direct kamela harris' team believed that having the microphones on would give donald trump more time to say the wrong thing . there are many rules regarding response time and in the past candidates have always had a live audience. this is changing now. there are only two candidates and moderators in one hall, and the media and spectators are in other places. certainly it affects how the candidates deliver their

lines and interact with each other: the rules of the debate are incredibly important, and i think we saw them work today. it is known that before the start of the debate, the authorities erected barricades outside the national constitutional center because many expected protests during the event. did such protests take place? yes, tonight i was in front of the national constitutional center and saw several protesters. most of them stood up for palestinian rights and spoke about how palestinians were treated during the war in gaza. obviously, this is a key issue here in the united states, especially for many young people. voters we have seen some of these protests and several clashes between protesters and police in other

parts of the city. but nothing serious that could disrupt the debate itself. of course, before such a major political event in the us , a separate stage was erected for trump supporters, while kamela harris supporters held their own rallies. walking through the city, i saw a whole busload of young garis supporters carrying placards through the streets. so the city definitely saw a variety of activity. and who do you think was more convincing? well that question is left to the discretion of the american voter. what we have to remember about these debates is that they generally don't change the minds of people who are already committed to one of the candidates. we know what donald trump will be like. in office, because we witnessed four years of his presidency, and we understand that approximately 35-40% of voters

will remain loyal to him, because they are deeply committed to his ideas. it is also known that kamela harris has significant support among democrats, but the main focus should be on those voters who are not yet decided who does not see any attractive option among the candidates. on election day, they will have to in a matter of seconds. to decide whether to go to the elections at all. it is these voters who will have the decisive influence, and it is not yet clear whether they will hear anything from the candidates that will convince them, so we leave it to them. discretion, do you think the poll results will change after this debate? this is exactly what we have seen throughout the history of us presidential debates, will there be a significant jump in the results polls in favor of one of the candidates, it

is not a fact, what really matters is the few states that can become the arena would. states that can vote democratic or republican on election day. these are states such as georgia, pennsylvania, michigan and other midwestern states, as well as some of the so -called sun belt states in the southwest . these states will ultimately decide who receives the 270 electoral college votes needed to become president of the united states. i want to add what... kamala harris has experience as a prosecutor, so maybe that experience helped her during the debate? what do you think? of course, each presidential candidate brings his personal experience to the debate. i covered kamela harris in the us senate as a congressional correspondent for voice of america. i saw her at congressional hearings

where she was very harsh on witnesses. the fact that she was a former prosecutor. in my opinion, it is very important that ukraine is mentioned so often in today's debates, it brings back foreign policy, in particular the war in ukraine, to the attention of american voters, at a time when we are dealing with many complex domestic issues here in the united states. so, it will reignite a debate that has been out of focus since congress approved the latest round

of us aid to ukraine earlier this year. it's great that i'm bringing this question back... thank you for the interview and good luck in the further rounds of pre-election debates. thanks, i hope the election season is quick, take care, it was nice talking to you.

greetings, to begin with, i want to show you a video that gives you a little understanding, and what is actually wrong with putin, you know, memories from childhood, you know, there is a famous story about how putin attacked a rat there, it drove this rat away somewhere there, and then this rat from the corner rushed at putin himself, and after that all analysts say that putin began to imagine. himself a rat, and therefore he cannot be driven into a thick corner, because he will rush somewhere there, well, a kind of legend, which actually has little, judging by everything, well, such in common with reality, that is, he, he of course, a rat, but he is the kind of rat that will run away somewhere, hide under some plinth and sit quietly, here, and this story, this is somewhere, as my so very so

tireless and talented colleague denys kazanskyi, whom i actually ... i just encourage you to watch and read, he is a very good guy, so he reminded me of a story told by schoolchildren, well , some of putin’s friends, as well as his teacher, and it would seem, you know, well, the story about how putin killed ducklings, well, it could be such a prologue to, i don't know, a biography there was chikatila. or yanoprianka of some serial maniac killer, well, but it became a prologue to putin's biography. i now suggest you play. in the game, i will show you the object, and you will tell what putin is here for, the red blanket. are you familiar with the red blanket? this is the blanket to cover yourself with when you

want to take the life of little geese. ducklings everything was very simple. the fact is that vera dmitrievna sent us on a hike one by one. today one goes to the grocery store, tomorrow another. and here is our alyokhov mykola divovyzhny, was sent to the nearest settlement to find some food. and here we are sitting, waiting, and for some reason he is gone for a long time, and suddenly alkhovov comes from above and grazes several pieces of these same ducklings. these ducks still had to be liquidated somehow, there was no way we could take them alive to leningrad. the fact is that the ducklings did not want to jump into the cauldron. who did not want to cut off their heads, everyone felt sorry for the birds. everyone refused. then volodya stood up and said: "then what will happen if we are left without dinner,

without food?" and here, as always, the most difficult, the most unpleasant thing had to be done by putin. well, that is, a normal story, when all the children, no one wants to kill the little ducklings, but you ... well, someone likes it, and it was putin, well, i’m telling you, this is how maniacs usually start, first they kill, then dogs, then kittens, and so on and so forth, and then people, and this is probably how putin’s fate would have turned out, that is, he would have ended up somewhere in ran, killing someone somewhere in the landings, well, that is, as i expected, but you know, no, it turned out that he had that teacher is like that, you know the kind... even a duck doesn't say the word kill, but says to eliminate, because the ducklings are to be eliminated, like some ducklings, terrorists or ducklings,

saboteurs, that is, only like that, well, that's probably the slang of some old hebeian knocker there, probably, and here is this old hebist, so she made such a signpost for the whole distance from this story. biography of putin, because it would be too simple to just kill, just eat, yes, probably, and well, in principle, it is clear, well, yes, people kill various animals and eat them, there is nothing here, no, they didn't just kill them, they decided to make it so that the ducklings themselves were to blame for killing them, that they literally provoked putin to kill them, you know, classically... the story that we we all see now, after that, literally everyone is provoking putin to commit murders, it is real , so as not to offend the ducks, there was a real verdict that

we are trying them, yes, yes, the verdict was read, and what did it look like, the poacher was convicted, the sentence was the death penalty, well, somehow, the trick was that our ducks swam, and one was whole time swam sideways, they ordered her to be the first. so she was the first, that is, vladimir putin put on a robe, acting as a judge, he did not read the verdict, he got this unpleasant, difficult task, to chop off her head, he took an ax, you just tell me and that's it once, twice, three times and then i will strike , that is , he eliminated the duck with his eyes closed so as not to look, maybe with open, maybe with closed, but eliminated. well, he started with the elimination of ducks, because they provoked him, and he continues in the same spirit, you see, now we finally know where he is coming from, that everyone is fooling him and everyone is provoking

him into some kind of atrocity, that's where it comes from, and you know, this story is very useful for those who want to negotiate something with putin, so that she just shows his way of thinking in general, he will declare any victim to be guilty. in the fact that he attacked her, and this, well, this is actually the behavior of a psychopath, i'll tell you this, and you can't negotiate with psychopaths, because you're only fueling their psychopathy, you're only you confirm them in the opinion that, well , there is such a picture of the world, that’s how they do everything right, and yes, they must be killed, because everyone around them is provoking, but no, this week , conversations began again about the fact that it is necessary somewhere to invite to... some other talks with putin, to sit down there, well , olaf scholl told about it, of course, as usual, it was not a very good continuation for him,

because... here is the first thing that immediately sounded, it is that, well, russian propaganda immediately rejected it simply immediately, moreover, exactly the fact that sholtz spoke about the negotiations gave russian propaganda, well, such a gift, once again mocking shultz, that is, to make it clear to you, everyone who will talk about any negotiations will immediately be called in russian. i believe that now is the time to discuss how we can quickly get out of this war situation and achieve peace. this means that

there will be. peace talks, peace conference, there will probably be another peace conference, and the ukrainian president and i agree that russia should be there, just an idiot, just idiot, well, this is such a general definition in general, which is circulating on all russian tv channels, and you know, this is such a friendly reaction, it is of course caused by the fact that it is the reaction of the state of russia itself. this is how the russian federation, its authorities, react in general to the proposal for negotiations, and this was voiced immediately by lavrov, he very clearly said that they do not need any negotiations, because, well, he began to invent, as usual, in the same spirit about ducklings, you know, that probably the ducklings themselves are to blame, that's how they started to tell, well, we attacked the ukrainians, because the ukrainians themselves are to blame.

it is not about where to gather. in which circle we are talking about what to discuss, if we discuss calls to cease fire and think about territorial exchanges, then this is not serious, because the problem is not in the territories, the problem is in the rights of people, there are hints that let's proceed from the fact that territorial issue, to be resolved taking into account the realities on the ground, it is not about... we never wanted someone else's land, we just wanted people who are an integral part of the russian world, russian culture, russian language, history, religion, so that they are treated humanely, well, the captured crimea is especially convincing, how they did not want the territory, as well as the captured donetsk and luhansk, and even the attempt to capture kherson, which has already

been said. about this seizure of territory, well , russian propagandists, of course, immediately rushed to explain why the territory is not important, and something else is important, and that these are all traps, well, if we translate all these explanations from some such, well, whimsical to human, the point is actually that, first of all, the territories are so important for them, and this is a way for them to destroy ukraine as such, and therefore... the point is really in ukraine, the point is not to seize some separate territories, the point is to destroy ukraine as such. they seriously think about the issues in the territories, the issues in the status of ukraine. they talk about possible territorial concessions, which in principle are not very interesting in moscow. you started with the fact that they are trying to lure russia,

and they perceive russia as such a dog. they rushed to this conference, first they need to liberate the kursk region, well, let them the reports have been cleaned up. vanya rightly said now, so what, will we agree to participate later? of course not. well, that is, suddenly, and if you give it back to the kursk region. no of course, but what then? by the way, when we were showing lavrov, we also noticed that there was something strange about him, he suddenly stopped being a minister and became a ministerial candidate for russian propagandists, they opposed him somehow like this, well, we don't know why this is so , but maybe some hint about this, that it is already necessary...