which, in principle, are not very interesting to moscow. did you start with the fact that they are trying to lure russia, and they perceive russia as such a dog? here you showed her a piece of sausage, livery to the scholz mentioned today. a piece of sausage was shown and we are like this: we ran to this conference. first, they need to liberate the kursk region. well, so that they clean up the reports. vanya rightly said now, so what, will we agree to participate later? well, that is , suddenly and if you give back the kursk region , then of course not, but what then? by the way, here we are when they showed lavrov, they also drew attention to the fact that somehow he suddenly stopped being a minister and became a ministerial candidate for russian propagandists, they rubbed him like this, well, we don't know why this is so, but maybe some hint of this well, it must already be... have it somehow differently,

well, returning from lavov to these conversations, well, if you look more frankly at what they are saying, then the point is, you know, that on this stage in order to go to negotiations, well, it is dangerous for putin, for the kremlin, because it is a loss of power, actually, because it is a complete, literally failure to achieve the goal, and well... well, as if, you know, it will be perceived as a failure in general of their entire special operation, and that is why the ministerial candidate lavrov is talking about , that no, you can't sit down and talk now, because that's not the point, and that's why they're trying to return to some such conversation, if the world would help them destroy ukraine as such, that's why which i repeat once again only the destruction of ukraine as a whole. the destruction of ukrainian statehood, well

the leveling of ukrainianness as such is the achievement of the goals of the kremlin and putin, this is exactly it, and not some separate pieces of territory, and that is why by shutting putin's mouth with some territories, we can only provoke putin to take further military steps, and that's why other options? now, as for scholz's statements, this search is already underway, it has been going on for more than a month, minsk 3, which they are developing for us. look what scholz said, he said, let's freeze the fighting on the front line. what does it mean on practice? we agree that kherson

cannot be returned to us. second moment. it is not for nothing that they cling to the kursk region. they want to create an exchange fund. for example, at future negotiations to say: we will leave the kursk region, and you will leave the zaporizhia region, we are exchanging one for the other. and then what comes out. then this minsk-3, which they are developing and which some, even in the press , like this one. idea, this will lead to the following: first, a crisis for us in power, then we leave, cancel the results of our referendum in september 22nd, then: it turns out, we were not able to occupy donetsk, zaporizhzhya, or kherson until the end, except for luhansk, after that they will start shouting about our defeat, well , you feel that there is some kind of contradiction, or you say that what... what territories are for you

unimportant, yes, or you say that no, we can’t, because how is it, and kherson then whose, well, that is, that is, no, and the territories are important, because it is clear that if we capture more territory, well, this is an easier way to destroy ukraine, well, what is there, honestly speaking, well, actually, you know, what else, well, what all of them are based on this confidence that i... it is necessary to demand more, to demand that more ukraine be seized, to demand that ukraine be destroyed there, to demand some such status of ukraine, some other than that it is just a country, independent, all this is based on the fact that that they continue to talk with russia, and any other statement that there should be some kind of negotiations actually inspires them to have these talks, because if it were about... that there cannot be any such conversations,

there can be no freezing of the conflict, there would be no such hopes of the russians that they they will be able to survive, but every such conversation... inspires them that no, we will push, we will push, and now, now we will hold out a little longer, and finally we will get our way, after this, as the russians think, after everything will be as usual, we will again travel the world with our ballets and petrodollars, and everything will be fine with us again, but if it were not for this constant hope given by various interlocutors who tell that you need to invite somewhere... russians, you need to talk to them somehow, you know, maybe the russians would behave completely differently, and in this context, of course, the biggest and best way to peace, that's what our defense forces demonstrated this morning, they just hit

moscow, and there, you know, near moscow, on some airfields that are there, there were no planes flying in the morning, there was this is, as they say, the carpet plan covered all the airfields. moscow and this is the only and truly effective way to peace, because not after talking about how to talk with russia again, they really want to sit down and somehow think, do something somehow, somehow leave ukraine altogether, no, no after this, they start thinking about it only after something flies through the window, at night the ukrainians carried out a massive attack on moscow and'. podolsk. in ramensk, ukrainian drones in the lyubertsy city district, ramensk and hit houses, sports passageways and high-voltage streets. five

people were injured, a 46-year-old woman died. in total , russia's air defense systems intercepted 144 ukrainian uavs that night. of these , the region attacked 20 enemy drones, 124 drones were shot down over the central regions of russia, 72 over the bryansk region, 14 over kursk, eight over bilhorod, 13 over tula, seven more over kaluska, five over voronetska, four drones were shot down on approach to lipetsk region and one more over orlovska. well, there are 144 arguments, literally for peace. that's what i understand, and you know, they impressed the russians, they really remembered them, it can be seen from the way they recorded the video, what a beautiful dawn, a very beautiful sky, the sky, this is ramenskoe, high-voltage,

it turns out, at night did they beat us for something, the gentlemen for something? here's the neighboring house, here's what's on earth is being made, where should we run?

you know, solovyov had a wonderful reaction to this, he didn't shout, how is it, it's there somewhere to hit berlin, not yet, he immediately began to find out who in his country should be hanged there or plant this is what i understand correctly, yes, yes, yes, well, that is , you see these blows somehow in their head , they awaken something like that, a desire to understand yourself in your country, and this is correct , yes, because, well, how else can you

awaken something like that there you who shoot and teach in particular, respectable media. you just explain to me who you work for... we have us here, and then usually mother, you are idiots, there is nothing sacred at all, you who are filming this joyfully, oh man, look, what are you thinking in what place? you have instead of a head what is located, you joyfully explain it, it is what and why, what do you want to do with it, behind this is the entire mental and intelligence and creative apparatus of 50 foreign special services, which comes up with a wide variety of topics, how to hide the sound of a flying drone what to organize passing through the darknet something, it's absolutely clear that... everything conventional hollywood can come up with is used to deliver strikes and

hide these strikes from air defense systems. when you post these videos. bastards, you tell me, who do you work for, you creatures? it would be very correct to take you idiots and throw them behind bars. a huge fine and jail time. the fine is gigantic, and to prison. well, that's all about who... will be imprisoned, this is all talk in order, you know, not to talk about the obvious thing, there would not have been these strikes, if there hadn't been, the attack on ukraine hadn't happened war in ukraine, there was no attempt to seize the territory of ukraine, and the simplest way, in fact, to prevent this from happening to the russians, is to withdraw the troops from ukraine, and that's it, and everything will stop, in one fell swoop. day immediately, nothing will happen, it is clear to anyone, that is, there will be no strikes on

russia, if there are no russian troops in ukraine, if russia will not fight in ukraine, a simple available opinion, and every such strike this opinion, well, literally kills in russian heads, because there is no other way, don't come any other way, because that's what they have you see, in my uncle's house, like at the beginning, they are there... you want to eat someone, let's say, let's condemn him and say that he himself is to blame, everything is straight, you know, like in the fable, you are already guilty of what do i want to eat, well , in order for this not to happen, it should fly in response, the only option that produces some thoughts, moreover, i will tell you, some practical thoughts have begun in solovyov about the fate of the homeland. his, well, some downright realistic, for the first time, he directly thought about what his future holds, what the future holds for

russia, and such deep thoughts appeared, he suddenly became interested in what the defeat of the russian federation was, that is, it is not how they will reach delamanche there, no, that's all, that's it , he's already talking about it, well, so that they can pretend a little as if he's there in he is hysterical, but... when he wants to know something so serious, he has a question, but how will it be, what does the defeat of russia mean? how do they imagine the strategic defeat of russia? what is russia's strategic defeat: ukrainian-german troops in moscow? the division of the country into 190 small countries, self-disappearing nuclear weapons. what is it, how do you do it do you see are you entering the territory of russia and

starting to control? what and how powerful nato troops, ringing lacquered bells, will run to do what? what will it look like in modern warfare? no one even tries to answer this question? and it can be seen that this worries solovyov very much, because of course, what are they going to do there on the territory of russia, well, the first thing they are going to do is imprison solovyov, convict him, maybe anything can happen, you know, they can condemn him to life , maybe up to the death penalty, anything like that is possible to be, so, yes, a serious question, but these are good, you know, all the options he described are in principle not bad, and they can be, well , the most interesting thing is that they did mention that, well , there is a defeat of russia, and strategic defeat. it happened more than once, and somehow this bright thought suddenly

occurred to them so directly, that is, they seriously began to think about it somehow, i believe that the right, correct direction of thoughts was given to these eyes, you know, i think such peacemakers strikes on russia, as for strategic defeat, i i don't agree, they see a strategic defeat in the complete destruction of russia, and... and it already happened, this is the collapse of the russian empire, the strategic defeat of the russian empire, the empire has disappeared, this country has disappeared, the second strategic defeat of the soviet union. union, this country also does not exist. the russian empire disappeared and stalin's soviet union appeared. oh, they won then. the soviet union also disappeared. this is a long-term strategic defeat. a strategic defeat, i understand, carthage that disappeared. this is a strategic defeat. a strategic defeat - the incas and the otsteks, who

disappeared well, what if solov'ov believes. that carthage must be destroyed, well, carthage must be destroyed, let's not argue, and you know, here's all the talk about the fact that the russian empire disappeared twice, first the empire, then the soviet union, it might seem, yes, and then with russia appeared, which attacked again, but look, every time after the collapse of the russian empire, finland and poland liberated themselves, in essence, they became separate countries that no one put under neither that these are individual countries, nor that they are entitled to their independence, it became a fact of history, they liberated themselves, if you imagine this territory, the russian federation, as such, you know, well, i, the personification of hell on earth, this is it, yes, this is one of the personifications of hell on earth, well

so this hell became less, at least for poles and finns, after. to the russian empire, and then there were also hard times and everything is not easy, but hell does not break easily, after the collapse of the soviet union, well, already, a lot of countries have been liberated, and hell has also become less, after this war, it will become more this is less hell, and in the end our task is to make this hell smaller, if we cannot... it is completely possible to eliminate it, to completely destroy the hell on earth, this is the russian federation, well , we can make it smaller, for us the main thing is to stay on the other side the border from this hell, this is our task now, the most, everything else, well, it may be good, but it is unattainable there, someone will say, yes, but it is attainable not to be in

hell, and we should not be in it, the only way, so strategically the defeat of the russian federation is very good for them, that they are already preparing for it, come on they are preparing more, let them be afraid, let them wait, because it will certainly happen, this strategic defeat for the russian federation, and hell will become less. see you events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskiy and invited experts soberly assess events, analyze them, modeling our future, every saturday at 1:10 p.m., with a repeat on sunday at 10:10 a.m. studio event with anton

borkovsky at espresso. new. a week on espresso, a weekly summary information and analytical program, a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, an analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts for the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and join the discussion, spend your monday evening summary with us and step confidently in the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smoly every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. green! on august 20, just before independence day, the parliament banned activities russian orthodox church and its branches in

ukraine. after receiving the tomos on autocephaly and the creation of a local church, this is the most important act for our national security in the field of religious organizations. i am proud to have been involved in these two historical events, which will finally cut off the tentacles of russian peace in ukraine. so we still have many challenges ahead of us. the law must work, and not turn into a nice declaration, as it often happens in our country. and we will make sure that the government does its job. but the most difficult the road has been covered. how was it? let's recall this dramatic story from almost. detective stories, but first subscribe to my channel, and together we will continue the struggle for spiritual independence. the story of the priest of the moscow patriarchate viktor talk from borodyanka khrestom. for the entire branch of the russian orthodox church, after the occupation of the town he turned the church into a russian prison, we were lined up under the fence of the church with cars, supported by military equipment, and at that

moment father viktor came out of the church with some man, well, i understand that this of the special services, and he told us that we are detained, a special check will be conducted on us, it will take somewhere until budvi, at this moment, the father said, place people, i will tell you so if... his victims survived and after the release of the bearded woman testified about the crimes of this priest. the sbu initiated criminal proceedings. in total, the special service exposed 72 priests, 22 of them have already received court sentences. some went to the russian federation on exchange. they were propagandists, adjusters, spies, saboteurs. the active work of the security service was the result public pressure on the authorities, because during the invasion of the ukrainians was shocked by the mass facts of the vryasach collaborators working against the enemy, but it was clear that point methods would only have a temporary effect, reduce public

irritation, but it was not a matter of specific persons, of the entire institution, which for moscow became its second army inside ukraine. the problem needed a holistic solution, because of the 800 parishes of the moscow patriarchate, only 10% severed ties with the russian orthodox church. all others. still in the status of official representatives of russia in ukraine. even after patriarch kirill and the council convened by him declared the war against ukraine sacred. only a law could be a legal solution to this threat to national security. and in the fall of the 22nd year, i wrote it and submitted it to the verkhovna rada for consideration. law project 8221 was supported by deputies from all pro-ukrainian factions of the parliament, from the homeland. european solidarity, servant of the people and voice. a number of regional councils voted for its adoption. a coalition of public organizations was created to support the document. it was issued from

taking into account the judicial practices of the european union. we did not intend to tell whom and how to pray. we aimed to sever ties with the aggressor state. the petition on the need to adopt draft law 8221 received the necessary 25,000 votes. the profile committee of the parliament also supported him. however, the cabinet of ministers was already preparing its draft law, it eventually received registration number 8371, and although i had a number of reservations about it, in particular, because of the cumbersome, ineffective scheme of banning the activities of the russian orthodox church, which could drag on for decade, i still voted for this project in the first reading. political ambitions in such an important matter are inappropriate. i understood that the government bill had a better chance of being voted on, and i decided to do the best i could. to participate in its improvement, meanwhile the ukrainians were boiling again. after a short list in the 22nd year, the priests of the russian orthodox church took up the old work again a year later. why are you

beating the military? in the spring of 2023 , the government's inaction on the issue of the legal ban of the russian orthodox church caused a radical reaction from society. after beating a serviceman zsu clerics of the moscow patriarchate. in the holy intercession cathedral in khmelnytskyi, ukrainians decided to do the government's work on their own. in a number of regional centers, the churches of the russian orthodox church, under the pressure of the community , transferred to the local church, and the city councils of lviv, khmelnytskyi, lutsk, and ivano-frankivsk terminated lease contracts for communal property and land with the moscow church. this is a separate big problem that the newly adopted law should solve. i talked about it in detail in my documentary church without christ. we are going to lviv. agency ngl media has done a fantastic

research. they created a map on which they put all the lands that are owned or used by the russian orthodox church. this list was cleaned as much as possible from those who are not in the pcmp, only those who are mentioned in their name in one way or another remained, right? and if? there are, for example, i know such cases when the russian church, and the land and the building itself are simply registered to natural persons, here is an example of an infographic, in cherkasy, yes, 96% communal property, whether in sumy or in transcarpathia, we see and how much well, actually there are, even in chernivtsi oblast i see the majority of communal ones, in chernivtsi oblast, for example, in odesa oblast we see 258. that’s 97% of which is communal property yes 97% is communal property the same kharkiv oblast well in the end we see there is even the lviv

region and everything here. 1 hectare, but we see that it is the smallest amount in ukraine, yes, but, well, even of this 91% is communal property. you have just watched an excerpt from the documentary church without christ, here at the bottom of the link, you can watch it completely and you will not regret it, because in this film we talked about all the crimes, lies, history, activities of the russian church in ukraine, and it was part of a huge company, it was important for us to convince... ukrainian politicians to listen to ukrainian society and finally ban the russian orthodox church in ukraine, in particular its activities. and it wasn't just one movie. we made another film about how the russian church struggled with what happened with the passage of the bill in the second reading and in general for it to become law, which only they didn't, but we still won. so, as of now, we have a powerful octopus, in the center of which is vadym novinsky, the moscow patriarchate, onufry

near... for him, a high-class international lawyer robert amsterdam and the star of trumpian propaganda takar carlson, as well as the influential lobbyist william burke white, they spread misinformation and trying to influence us senators and congressmen, as well as people's deputies of ukraine. the ultimate goal is to preserve the structures of the russian orthodox church in ukraine. why did the moscow patriarchate obey and hired a whole lobby network in the usa. because we, people's deputies, did everything very correctly. in the committee on humanitarian information. politicians, representatives of different factions put aside their political differences and together focused on creating a high-quality document based on the government draft law 8371. i would especially like to note the constructive work of the committee chairman nikita poturaeva. a lot depended on him as a representative of the pro-presidential majority. his sharp statements in defense of the parliamentary version of the government document, obviously, not everyone at the bank liked them. but

i have already said, the ban on the activities of the russian orthodox church in ukraine. this is not a reason for political jealousy, but an existential question. so when the moscow patriarchate saw that the deputies were already at the finish line, they decided to scare them, that is, us. colleagues who are in favor of recommending that the verkhovna rada consider bill number 8371, please vote. kutraev for. thank you, colleagues, the decision was taken unanimously. i congratulate you on ... passing this very important piece of legislation in committee. robert amsterdam wrote as many as two letters to the address parliamentarians, where he threatened american sanctions if the law was passed. my name was also mentioned there, as one of the biggest supporters of banning the activities of the russian orthodox church in ukraine. at the same time , pro-russian deputies in the parliament became more active. they blackmailed their colleagues, threatened them. if

the moscow patriarchate in ukraine does not have. relation to cyril and the kremlin, as they claim, then why did they put up such aggressive resistance? the question is obviously rhetorical. someone was really scared by such threats. it is known that americans have always been sensitive to religious freedoms. and that is why our bill, first mine, and then the consensus, parliamentary one, was not about faith, but about the constitutional system and, in particular, national security. protecting them is the unconditional right of any nation and the basic duty of any government. the verkhovna rada could adopt this document in the spring, but incomprehensible political intrigues began again. sponsors and lobbyists of the moscow patriarchate did not give up. they even involved state structures. the position of the state committee on ethnopolitics is destructive in some moments and of freedom of conscience, which openly overwhelmed the draft law, first surprised, then outraged. the profile committee of the verkhovna rada even adopted a special statement condemning the discrediting of its work. the issue of protecting

the religious rights and freedoms of ukrainian citizens is considered through the prism of national security, which allows to clearly separate and protect the religious freedom and security of ukrainians from the activities of religious organizations associated with the aggressor. it is for this purpose that the preamble of the draft law contains references to article nine and article 11 of the european convention on human rights and the decision of the national security and defense council, which initiated the development of the draft law. so the law. the project does not in any way interfere in the sphere of a person's religion, but only regulates the activities of organizations operating in the religious sphere. the committee is extremely surprised by the pseudo-critical comments that have been made recently by various commentators on the text of the bill 83-71. these statements give the impression that these experts, first of all, have not read the text of the draft law before second reading secondly, they try to...