for example, i am now again, this is not any suspicion of certain officials in the west, but the same different people, and when we remember the story that the president of ukraine once voiced, that before the counteroffensive that was supposed to take place in the 23rd year to the south, there zaporizhzhia region, the offensive plan was in the kremlin before it began to be implemented, and therefore it was not as successful as we would have liked. and now, when in the united states of america they say, you give us the targets on which you plan to strike, and we have again there is such a segment of public opinion leaders, people either from the military or close to the military, and they say, yes, now we will go through the goals, and then there, well, naming certain names of such politicians loyal to russia who want to negotiate, they say, and then all this will be surrendered, they will place anti-aircraft defenses there and all these shots will be, as they say, into milk, and... what is the reason here, well, that is, you

give permission, we will not hit the place where nuclear missiles are stored there, let's say something that will have a threat, according to the kurdish aes or there according to some other as, but give us the right to strike, as if we are not doing anything so threatening to the planet, why is there a need to provide a clear plan and, as they say, a hit map? it seems to me that here in ukraine, a few things have been somewhat mixed up. in one, in fact, secretary of state blinken, he repeated several times, in recent days, starting his visit to london, then in kyiv, and today in warsaw, when he held a joint press conference with the polish minister of foreign affairs sikurski, that it is not about that to ukraine has provided a whole list of where it wants to hit, so that ukraine can lay out its plans for the next... and, let's say, for the next stage

of the war, for the next year, that is, what, so that the united states can assess what, what exactly ukraine needs, what kind of help, so that they can plan what kind of help to provide, and what's on the whole list, it seems to me that in fact president zelenskyy himself made it public, and i think that it was mentioned that when the ukrainian delegation was in washington last week that she passed list of all these actually, i think there is no secret here, because it is known where the relevant russian military facilities are located on russian territory, that, i would say, you know, these are such elements of public diplomacy, all these lists, plans, actually, er, what is read between the lines, if you translate all this from diplomatic language, then i think that first of all it is important that both the american and british foreign ministers communicated in kyiv. with

the leadership of ukraine, and it is also very important that joe will meet tomorrow in washington biden and kier starmer, and i think that positive decisions towards ukraine should be expected, although they will probably not be announced publicly, but i say it again, the russians will feel it for themselves, i have two questions here, first, let's make the first one shorter, because it is for the future, and the second one will be about the debate between trump and garis, and as far as i understand, there is their debate. vice presidents, for the first time, if i'm not mistaken, again on september 13th , the fiscal year of the united states of america is to end, and the issues of new finances, and this is a critically important question for ukraine, there is no doubt about it, especially with regard to military aid, it will be acute. please explain, if it is possible to simply explain, here it is, the new financial year, there should be a budget, what will be allocated to ukraine, who will take care of it now? understanding

that in the usa all this is superimposed on the presidential elections, which should already be held in november, that is, in fact, october, and finances are also needed there, and the budget, and elections, and it is not known who will win, and all of this is somehow what it is now a threat to financial and military aid for ukraine, well , military aid is also money, and we understand perfectly well, shouldn't we be worried here, there these and these issues are not related, and those people who deal with finances, they will figure it out themselves, and that which has already been approved will be paid. and then other decisions will be made there, please, i think there is no need to worry, because there is a part of the money that is allocated not for one fiscal year, but for two, that is, until september 30, 25, the money that must be used by september 30 of this year, yes two options, either the congress will pass a simple resolution with just one sentence that these funds can be used and continued in the next fiscal year, or ukraine receives a very large aid package. so that

all the funds are used, that is, this aid will certainly be stretched over time, but there is definitely no need to worry about this, but as for the budget, well, most likely, the congress will decide. a temporary budget for the period before the new president takes office, then, after that, there will be a new administration with a new congress, congress is also re-elected to work on the permanent budget for the next fiscal year. and the debate, how did they react, because we have, you know, those who want to see kamlogari with the president of the united states of america, well, maybe there are people who want to see trump as president, such people are everywhere. and in ukraine obviously too, everyone, well, as they say, this is not football, here there is no score on the scoreboard, and therefore you cannot say who won, but there is no 3:0, 3:2, penalty shootout, then that’s it it is clear, well, but how to evaluate whether garis won or lost and whether won or lost trump, how it is evaluated in

the united states of america, well, first of all, of course, the media, what they write about it, and what those people who are considered well-known and professional experts say, please. you know, if you evaluate the debate simply from the point of view of two political opponents meeting and debating about, about current affairs, about plans, then the conclusion here is absolutely one, that kamele harris simply destroyed her opponent, that is, destroyed intellectually, morally, she destroyed trump in this debate, and that, by the way this is the common opinion of both liberal commentators in america, and so-and-so... well-known conservative respected commentators, such as , for example, carol roeg, he, he is saying today, he is such a republican of the republicans that she just destroyed trump at the debate, but debates are not elections, and no matter how people perceive these debates,

they are not voting in elections, in elections, people will vote, that is, they will fill out ballots, drop them in the appropriate boxes. it will take place on november 5, or someone will be early to vote, and the debate has no direct influence on the vote, you see, the fact is that in the united states there is a very polarized society, the majority is divided, and what is polarized by politics, the economy, the issue of migrants, which is the main polarizing thing now, if you look back . from the society of the united states of america, this is political and ideological polarization, that is, there is a part of society, approximately half, which is devoted to the values ​​of liberal democracy, freedom, human rights, and there is another half of society, part of which of this half, she is simply not satisfied

with her life, the other part, she adheres to such very right-wing ideological views, and this is what determines how people voice. the vast majority of voters made up their minds a long time ago, and no matter what happens in the debates, they will not change their views, not a single trump voter will vote for, well, you are talking about the nuclear electorate and, that is, there are, but still there are people who hesitate, there are, how many are there, five or six states in which there will be, there are seven states, which are decisive votes, the main ones are michigan, wisconsin, pennsylvania, and also... georgia, north carolina, arizona, and nevada, in these seven states the fate of the election will be decided, and it will be decided by only a few tens of thousands of votes of voters in these states, voters who are not politicized, who do not adhere to any ideology, who vote simply because of their perception of modernity,

the current current situation, how they see their future, how they see that under which government, under which president they will live better, and the struggle goes on precisely for... these voters, i would say that for sure kamela harris managed to encourage some part of these voters to vote for her after the results of the debate, a small part, but still she has to work very hard to encourage more, because it's a few tens of thousands votes that decided the fate of the election in the 16th year, which decided the fate of the election in the 20th year, and they will decide the fate of the election in the 24th year, and therefore both candidates, they understand this, by the way. both are fine, they will campaign in these seven states, for example haryat, who today is conducting campaign events in north carolina, and trump is in arizona, they will constantly travel to all these states, talk to voters there, will conduct quite

aggressive advertising there on television, in other media, in social networks, will attract volunteers to you just literally had people knocking on doors and talking to voters, so it's going to be like this... a tight fight, harris looked at the debate, just better, i'm saying, she destroyed trump, and that's the way liberals think, so and so and conservatives, you know i... it can't have any influence on the results of the election, i'm not a fan of taylor swift, but i like this person, she's successful, i 've always wondered who she reminds me of, yesterday i saw a photo of her with a cat where she said , that i am a cat woman without children, and childless is there a cat woman or something or a cat mother, something like that, she reminded me, there was once a preacher in america, cathy john kuhlman, it was somewhere in the 60s and 70s, who had a huge influence in the states, well, this is such a... a charismatic woman who made herself and also has a huge influence, and a phenomenon taylor swift and the fact that she supported

kamelogaris, it will have some significance, in general, the support of other movie idols, pop idols, sports idols, because we know that in the united states there is, well, say, there is baseball, which also has its idols, basketball, or is it, or is it so, conditionally one can hope that it will affect something, in general, everyone will think with their own head, and taylor of course. what she said there, well, that's our life, she 's fine anyway, well, yes, it can matter, especially, mostly, i would say, among young voters, because there are young voters political ones who don't even want to register to vote at all, she is really very popular, and this popularity of hers can be such an echo among young voters that, well, if she said that she would catch fire, then maybe , maybe then i too... must, must think about politics, register, go vote, that is

, this, this can have an influence, maybe, maybe, among young voters, especially, and with regard to actors, there, say, athletes, well it less influence has, of course, that because taylor svi today there is such a star, who is loved by many, many people, especially young people, so it can have an impact among young people, in particular, it can encourage those young voters who were not going. trump and his vice-president jaydy vance, regarding ukraine, it will have an effect on at least a conditionally significant part of the voters, well, this is a global war, and a war against russia, a war against this tyrant. is there minimal, minimal impact, it won't be a very

big impact, but look, even during the debate kamalagarya turned to american americans of polish origin, who live in the state of pennsylvania, there are 800,000 of them, so that they think about it, for whom they will vote, that is, it can have such and such an influence, especially from these pig states and wherever there is such a diaspora from the central region. of eastern europe and that, including the ukrainian diaspora, that is, people, people should think about how, how it will affect ukraine, mr. ihor, here the only question has almost surfaced, but i can't, well, let there be such feedback from by our contributors in youtube, me i will ask one short question, and you will say yes or no from amazing johnny, he writes: ask mr. igor, does he agree with kamalegara's words that trump would surrender ukraine in 24 hours, yes or no? yes, he himself said about it that he, he, he is going to end the war in 24 hours, and she

told him exactly that, that you will surrender ukraine, and you yourself will surrender to putin, he will eat you for lunch . thank you very much for participating, thank you for your comments, i wish you a nice day, ihor eisenberg was with us, professor mangetenskyi university this is the mood in the usa, but in any case, as far as i understand, from this conversation, in this story, the fight will go until the last second, as they say, nose to nose, well, if ... what suddenly will happen, well , what happened today during the day in ukraine, let me tell you literally in a moment. there is a war going on, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. we are engaged in propaganda. russia is throwing millions of petrodollars into turning ukrainians into little russians. ukraine will become russia. we oppose information attacks of the russians from... chronicles of the information war with olga ley. tuesday-thursday at 17:15, repeat,

tuesday-friday at 22:00. great return of great lviv. conversations, discussions, finding solutions, the largest conversational format of ukraine in the evening prime time. in general, i think we need two things. money and weapons. we did not start this war, but we must finish it and we must win. every thursday at 9:15 p.m. in the project, velikiy lviv talks about the most important things on the espresso tv channel. good evening, we are from ukraine! well, we start with attack on kharkov, because the enemy attacked literally closer to the evening, so the russians hit the capital of the slobodzhan region, the occupiers directed guided air bombs at the city, private

homes were targeted, more than 15 homes were damaged, two women and a child were rescued from the rubble, told... city mayor ihor terikhov, four people turned to doctors with an acute reaction to stress. we wish recovery, of course, to those who suffered. unfortunately, one person died, six more were injured in the dobropil community. damaged houses, power lines, a gas pipeline and a car. also, the enemy repeatedly shelled myrnograd in donetsk region, the local market is on fire. more than 30 trade pavilions caught fire, the state emergency service reported. in the morning, the invaders also attacked the city and were full. destroyed the dmitrivsky bridge between myrnograd and pokrovsk. videos and photos of the destroyed building were published by local telegram channels , the local authorities of pokrovsk confirmed that the russians shelled the overpasses in the city the night before and tonight. so are they cut off the water supply. 75 wells for public use were drilled in pokrovsk in the city, as well as

drinking water and water were organized, and we understand that the situation in pokrovsk is becoming more and more difficult, not only in terms of the military. yes, and front-line, but in terms of humanitarianism, and now not only shelling, but also logistics, because there is a bridge and a water supply. firefighters rescued a seven-year-old boy during a fire in mykolaiv. the incident happened the day before. it is reported to the derss emergency service. on the second floor a multi-storey building was occupied by an apartment. the rescuers took the boy out of the occupied room and provided him with an ambulance before it arrived. the necessary first aid was provided by the medics, later the medics took the child to the hospital, we wish the child a speedy recovery, and again about the traumatized and the wounded, three people were wounded in komysany in the kherson region, the occupiers targeted the house, where at that time, where there were people at that time, now just a second, i have it, okay, we'll do it differently.

and let's read these for a second, yes let's read these news differently, because i have some certain problems, let's talk about what this is, so the occupants of the explosives from the drone . it was reported to the regional administration a few hours earlier. a 54-year-old man was seriously injured due to an uav attack, his leg was torn off, unfortunately, and his arms were damaged, doctors are now fighting for his life, well , we will continue to talk about what, well,

today is happiness for many residents, today is happiness for many residents of the capital, for a long time the metro branch was not working, it concerns the demiivska metro station, well, this branch, there were repair works, there were certain problems caused, again for various reasons, well, but today finally the subway trains started running, let's see, from teremki to the heroes of the dnipro, the blue branch of the capital's metro is fully functional again, i remind you, for nine months, part of the residents of the holosiiv district returned in 2010, when lipitka was the last stop of the metro. every morning and every evening there was nowhere for an apple to fall on lybitskaya. the station became a transport hub for the citizens of the six stations that were closed for repairs. between teremky and demiivska instead,

shuttle traffic was organized, and several duplicate or auxiliary routes were launched above ground. the most popular bus numbered 2m, which completely reproduced the train route. in soma , it was possible to replace the subway with approximately one hundred units of ground transport. some kyivans managed to adapt during these nine months, and some even to practice with the help of buses for two. was it difficult, how much did it make life difficult? you know, it's even faster than the metro was working, well... i just adjusted to the schedule of the metro, i saw that if i take the metro, i arrive later than if i take the bus, i don't know, why did it turn out like that, i drove. by buses, which were offered as an alternative by the kyiv administration, of course, it was much more difficult and longer, on foot in bits, we walked as long as it took, for 15 minutes,

us residents who live in lybitsk, dimeyevsk, we were left with that coin , in general, everything, the metro, and the market, and all, as they say, the benefits of civilization, it's hot, there are a lot of people, stuffy, try to get there. you, while you are waiting in line, you can drive three or four pieces, with your feet, with your own feet, legs walk, sand walk mostly. the official reason for stopping the metro on this section on december 8 last year was errors at the design and construction stage. in particular, it refers to the lack of chemical fixation of soils, inappropriate stiffness tunnel and the unaccounted level of groundwater. repair work lasted nine. months, and now the trains of the blue line of the metro are running on their usual route again, the works cost the capital uah 383 million. during this time

, the construction site was prepared, more than 200 cable networks were laid, in particular the network of detek, ukrtelecom, and others, a pit with a depth of more than 15 m was developed, the old part of the tunnel with a length of 27 m was dismantled and a new one was built, and the tunnel frame was strengthened on both sides, which at ... is waiting for a new section, new tracks have been laid, all engineering has been restored networks, established safe systems of train movement. from now on, trains will again run from teremki to the heroes of the dnipro, and instead of celebrating the opening of the long-awaited stations in troeshchyna or the winegrowers, kyivites are rejoicing at the restoration of the existing ones.

two hours to learn about war and how the world lives, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening for espresso. good evening, we are from

ukraine. we return and continue, this is a big broadcast on the spresso tv channel, let me remind you, my name is vasyl zemaev. we are now having an important conversation about such an important body, which has well, at least to make it impossible for the breeding and growth of corruption in ukraine, and... the perspective is to destroy it altogether, this is the highest anti-corruption court, we will speak with radyslav tkachenko, he is a lawyer, mr. radyslav, i congratulate you, good evening, here are 5 years of work by vaksa, etc. go out into the street, ask people, did you feel that corruption is being fought in ukraine, that it has been overcome, or that it has been at least a little bit beaten down somewhere, i don’t know that people will answer, but anyway, let’s go, as they say, or let’s start in let's talk about what wax actually is, why it was there created, and how do you rate the cooperation. of the anti-corruption court with other anti-corruption bodies, institutions, as they say, some found suspects, well , then investigative actions and as a result a fair

legal verdict, isn't that how it works? uh, you know , if you ask people on the street whether they feel the activity of anti-corruption bodies in the state, in principle, i think that people will say yes, because scandals... in recent years have become much more, that is some kind of deep-seated corruption began to be revealed, which had taken root in the ukrainian language society and trivially prevented us from developing further, we have been living with this for decades, and something had to be done about it, and of course, the creation of anti-corruption bodies is a positive, let's say, path that our state has decided to follow, and the creation, including the higher anti-corruption court promotes. in the fact that today we are starting to fight corruption more actively and in the end i hope that someday we will reach the level where, let's say, no, maybe we won't overcome it.

corruption in general, but let's reduce it to some more or less level that will not interfere ukrainian society to develop and ukrainian statehood to be built in a dignified manner. as for the court itself, it was created precisely to hear cases of top-level corruption, because we had a huge problem with the fact that there was a lot of latent corruption, because of which citizens simply did not ... know about it, and did not even imagined its scale, and even if some scandals arose, they were often either somehow hushed up or simply faded away, they stopped talking about them, and the people who really were involved in such top-level corruption, they did not were punished, and due to the fact that there is no punishment, of course, that people will understand that it is possible to continue with impunity.

to do what they were doing, with the creation of the higher anti-corruption court, this situation changed in a very positive way , in the sense that cases of top corruption really began to be considered, the higher anti-corruption court has already issued more than 200 verdicts, which sentenced two two hundred and 77 people , of which, by the way, i want to emphasize 30 people he found innocent, that is, we... we are talking about the fact that in fact the top corruption can be investigated in ukraine, it can be investigated effectively with real punishments for those who engaged in corruption. well, yes, but let's say there are stories when representatives of, say, the ministry of defense, after a loud scandal there with purchases, different at different prices, and there for weapons, food for the troops, there for ekir, and then

looks like this. .. well, somewhere there, someone is still under investigation, there is no verdict, he got out, he was released, he was on bail, he disappeared, and here how can we ask if yes, who do you know in particular, so that it was just a famous name, and it was there, relatively speaking, and a civil servant of the first rank, because that's how she is, you know, as it always turns out, something happens in the department, it could be the regional state military administration there, it could be a ministry, we won't even go down there. there to the departments, but still some deputy deputy is always to blame, a third one who creeps up, someone else, and even those somehow later disappear somewhere, dissolve like that, no one is watching over me, now there is no time to watch over everyone those things, and if some journalist somewhere writes that what do you know, they released a petrenko there, everyone, who is he, and what, jackets, eggs, but everyone has already forgotten what it is, that's why the question is , which is still some bright case where people would feel, well, justice. there is, i won’t remember,

maybe you will tell me, here i want to make a warning right away, because here you can, let ’s say, get caught in a wrong opinion, expect some big case so that people feel that there is supposed to be justice, it is not quite correct from the point of view of real justice and from the point of view of the principles of criminal justice, because we should not judge, let's say, the work of the court by how many high-profile officials, big officials, it imprisoned. and how it really adheres to the procedure, how it, how the court adheres to the general principles of criminal proceedings, because the court should not be just a conveyor belt that fulfills the public request for the landing of people whom everyone considers guilty of something, in this, by the way, in my opinion, there is a big problem in ukraine today, with the fact that we in advance, we consider all people guilty, without understanding, without understanding the essence of the case, in

the presence of evidence, in that... there really are valid reasons to consider a person a suspect, accused, and in principle guilty, so it seems to me that we should form society's expectations in general, that we should measure the effectiveness of the court, based on the fact that it should imprison someone, let's say, significant, this is not quite right, however, as of today, it is the highest anti-corruption court, it reports on what... it was a number of people's deputies were sentenced, 29 judges who were found guilty of crimes, a number of prosecutors, members of the government were sentenced, and in principle, this is already, let's put it this way, in my opinion, an indicator that big cases really can be investigated, however, in my opinion,

if... evaluate from the point of view, then evaluate.