friends are not yet with roman tsimbalyuk on youtube, then join his page for operational comments from roman tsimbalyuk, well, i hope that today there will be operational comments from roman for the espresso tv channel. so, let's start with the diplomatic war that moscow is starting against british diplomats, well obviously and not only against british diplomats, moscow has already charged six employees of the british embassy. in espionage, they say, signs of intelligence-subversive work were found in them, as reported with reference to the fsb, the representative of the russian foreign ministry, maria zakharova, accused the british embassy in moscow of subversive actions. i will quote zakharova: we fully share the statements of the russian fsb and the assessment of the activities of the british diplomats. the british embassy went far beyond the boundaries outlined by the vienna embassy. conventions, but the most important thing is

that it is not only about the formal side of the issue and the inconsistency of the declared activity, but about primitive actions aimed at causing harm to our people, it is fair in quotes of zakharov, about justice, about vienna conventions and everything else. so, as evidenced by this diplomatic war, it means that the british will be first, then the americans, then. there will be the french, then there will be the germans, well, potential members of the future coalition, which can give us the weapons that will fly to moscow, so here zakharova must correct sergiya, because she wrote to our people, but the population will be correct, it is not one and the same, the difference is very, very important, you know, a diplomat is inclined to use passports and... the most terrible thing that can happen in this

situation, a person will get on a plane and fly home to cloudy, cloudy london via istanbul and then change the embassy and accordingly work in another country, so there is no tragedy for diplomats in this case, here you know, i would i looked at the other, this is what comes out, so the following thing comes out, the british say: take missiles, kill russian soldiers, and this seems to be such a terrible answer, well, if this is all that the russian federation is capable of, well, to a certain extent this is also evidence of modernity situation in international relations and in general, so it is important here, after all, as far as i'm concerned, in terms of missiles, they found out with the diplomats, everything will be fine with them. er

, the english language will be there for those who need it, ah, well, the only thing that putin will teach, they already speak chinese. the issue with missiles, we don't need announcements that we allow or anything else, we want to wake up in the morning, or even in the afternoon, and read that an important military facility on the territory of russia was destroyed, first of all, of course, we are talking about ... airfields and launchers, who are talking about stand-ins, that's what we need in this situation, well, a diplomat is like that, masha , she has such a job, she doesn't burst with anger, but vyacheslav volodin and dmitri piskov burst with anger this week, who commented on the fact that as if it were already a fact that great britain gave permission to strike storms... gave ukrainians on the territory

of the russian federation putin, apparently, after piskov and volodin were at the warm-up , he came out and said that in general this leads to war with nato. then the question is, what are they? 2, for years they told the russians that they were fighting with the nativites on the territory of ukraine, it turns out that they were lying until now, but now they are seriously talking about the fact that the alliance... can enter into a war with the russian federation or russia is at war with the alliance, but let's listen to putin himself, because this is also an example, well, i would say so, of political schizophrenia, because we still need to show our tv viewers, forgive me, let's show putin what he said, if this decision is adopted , then... will be adopted,

this will mean the direct participation of nato countries, of the united states, european countries, in the war in ukraine. this is their direct participation, and it significantly changes the very essence. the nature of the conflict, it will mean that nato countries, the usa, european countries, are at war with russia, and if this is so, it means a change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will pose to us, roman, i can't understand when british, american or german tanks...cars drive around the kursk region, is it the participation of the north atlantic alliance in the war against russia, or what on what is happening to kurshchyna is already rejected by putin, and it is only about long-range weapons, and he says that we will,

that means, if the essence of the conflict will change, we will make appropriate decisions, based on the threats that will pose to us, what, what he says and how to explain it all? well, in fact, he is just reaching for a nuclear bomb now, but he is reaching very carefully and does not use this phrase nuclear weapons, because he already got a little bit of all of them and, as they say , the reds on the red lines have grown, i don't i know there is still a little red viburnum on these red lines and it will actually grow, everything is really interesting here and... it is filmed, if you notice, it is like on the street, but on top of the house, that is, in this way they always think about save the life of this

maniac, and this is also such an interesting sign, in general, i want to say the following: not what you called the russian federation, western weapons are already being used non-stop there, this should simply be emphasized, and including and rockets, remember, we they are already used to the fact that the black sea fleet does not exist, but it used to have a headquarters, and the first such, well, such a demonstrative missile strike was right there, it was destroyed in sevastopol right there on... there was this building on the hill, it was destroyed and what, what they, they pretended that this is how it should be, now in fact we have to wonder what arguments vladimir putin has, and they

tell there, well, they have such a topic there, what if something flew into alena on the tu95 airfield, it must have been launched from nato. these uavs and propaganda say that they must be struck some kind of super bomb, so i want to say, russian monsters, you are already using all your super bombs, which seem to have no analogues, and i would very much like our western partners, they would not engage in this diplomacy, this public rhetoric that we sometimes we give permission, sometimes we don't, by the way, today, september 13, this issue should be discussed by the president of the united states and the prime minister of great britain, there is no need to make any announcements, especially with technical support, for example, talk about that we we give permission to strike and indicate the number

of kilometers, well, any one is just a general, he is simply shocked by such a policy of western leaders, because you have to determine what you want, what do you want to destroy? planes, then it is necessary to destroy them first, and then say something, well, this is a military aspect, a diplomatic one, i understand that this is one of the reasons why so many of these messages are now in the air, in fact, the western world uses it , including such a negotiating position that a maniac, a pavzai, is coming to the peace summit in november, it is necessary to end the war, and if you you won't do that, then the ukrainians... we'll hand over the missiles, well, i don't know how i feel, it's still a false story, first you need to strike, burn the planes, and then say the same thesis that crawl away, well, at least it will have a chance of success, but now, well, it is clear that it

will drag on for quite a long time. keir starmer, this is the british prime minister, in response to the statement of the kremlin dictator about nato and the fact that... the west, they say, wants a war with russia, said that putin started the war himself in ukraine and can end it at any time what time to quote keir starmer. we are not looking. we have no such intentions in any conflict with russia, but they started this conflict, and ukraine has the right to self-defense, - said keir starmer on the way to the united states of america, by the way, a meeting between keir starmer and the president is scheduled to take place today joseph biden in washington, and there they will discuss the obvious possibility of allowing ukraine to use western missiles to strike deep into the russian federation, you still ... i understood so, roman, don't think that until the peace summit and, in general, before the end

of the presidential elections in the united states of america, there will be no such decision, or if there is one, then it may not be announced, well, at least there will not be this red carpet where joseph biden will appear there and kerr starmer will say, well, that’s it, we have now decided on the stormshades first, as the guardian wrote, by the way, that... the stormshades will already be beaten on the territory of the russian federation, this announcement will not be made, but this, can this be taken as the last chinese warning for russia? well, it looks like it in the big picture, let's be honest, we don't care how the russian invaders will be killed, whether it will be a shadow curtain or american missiles, we are interested in the number, and actually we are interested in the cessation of this air terror on the part of the russian federation. because somehow it, you know, is strangely happening, all the western powers here, negotiations, negotiations,

one, third, fourth, 110th peace plan, and at the same time they fly to russian cabs for soums and not only for soums, to vladimir putin, who, how does he justify this, that it is ukrainian the army, it cannot use stormshadow missiles on its own, well, i want to say the following, you talk a lot about the ukrainian army... i thought stupid things, i even remember his phrase like this, but take power into your own hands, ukrainian military, i it will be easier for you to come to an agreement, well, others may, but these are just negotiations, this statement by putin, it sends us to the historical background of the common, and some years ago, answering my question, he said the following:

there are no post-soviet or ukrainian weapons anymore , because the intensity of the fighting is very high very big, it’s all ours, our hummers, our bradleys, and all this nomenclature, so if vladimir putin wants to play a game, we are not there, but this is the second round, and it is important, of course, that it is clear that the western countries, they always have this idea in their head that... they have a nuclear bomb, it is still important that they do not, as they say, back down, and

demonstrate that hitting russia is normal in a situation where they launch rocket-bomb strikes, and in moscow itself, by the way, no one says that it is necessary to nine-story buildings, or some other buildings, there are more than enough military purposes, and this should be done demonstrably, so. wonderful moscow, where it is still forbidden to turn on the air-raid warning signals, there are always demites somewhere, as if they choose a new putin, and the old one is thrown out the window, this is a very important, important thing, then many people will begin to think that, well, what vladimir putin is what he is, there is an option for the letter x, and from the point of view. without common sense, he is just an idiot and a maniac, well, just me wanted to say either x or m, well maniac or x.

another event that happened on thursday , september 12, and it is also quite revealing, when the russians attacked a civilian cargo ship in the black sea that was transporting wheat to egypt, and this also, in principle , happened exclusively in the economy. zone of romania, according to the romanian coast guard, around the 23rd local time, being in the exclusive economic zone of romania, that is... in the territory controlled by romania, or in these waters, sea waters, it happened, it happened this strike, that is, russian planes flew and hit this ship, but we do not see any such concern even on the part of the same egypt, although

the ship was sailing there under some other flag, that is, it is not egyptian, as is usually used by various countries there. the fourth countries of the world, and romania was also, i think, embarrassed by this attack, that is , it had not happened for a long time, and again it happened, this is this, this shows that putin is trying to show his impunity every time, it is like the flight to mongolia , it's like blows on ships that are in the exclusive economic zones of the countries that are part of the north atlantic alliance, it is like fighter jets that accidentally cross there... have some unauthorized borders with the alliance, he is specially in the role of a gopnik trying to test the world and show that he can everything, but they can't do anything to him? well, it is clear that the action shows this, it is the same as killing three employees of the red cross, yesterday, well, it is an event of the same order,

to show that you cannot do anything to us, but we can, well, there are options in the black sea. answers, in fact we have to, they won't understand any other way, we have to hit them, and if someone thinks that they are attacking a civilian ship, then we can attack a civilian ship, the only thing is that we have to choose very carefully here, it is clear that this should be under the russian flag, and the novorossian one, as experience has shown, is a base that is not protected from everything and from... everyone, and it seems to me that our nato friends, they seem not to react in any way, but they are still preparing a military response , but i still get out of it, no need to think that the alliance is such a team of those who do not have the political will to take active action.

once again, the technical and military-technical answer, it is obvious, it is... inflicted damage, moreover, nato has enough mechanisms to understand where this missile was launched from, if it is from a military aircraft, then it must be shot down, it seems to me that other options are available , and it will still come, another interesting event took place this week, or rather an episode in the crimean platform, when the president of turkey. erdogan stated that in a video message, stated that crimea occupied by russia must return to ukraine, in accordance with the norms of international law, that recep tayyip erdoğan, whom putin considered his friend and believed that it is quite possible in a regime where he is not expected anywhere, and in turkey too , by the way, they are not waiting, because this

week there was information that putin demanded that his fighter jets accompany him. to turkey, that is, the russian side, and the turkish side said: "well, listen, we have systems, nato systems, patriots, they will simply shoot down these two or three fighters that will accompany putin, but let's listen to recep tayyip erdogan, what he said about crimea." our support for the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of ukraine remains unwavering. the return of crimea to ukraine is a requirement of international law. ensuring the security and well-being of the crimean tatars, one of the indigenous peoples of crimea, is also one of the priorities of our foreign policy. piskov said that the issue of belonging to crimea belongs to the category of disagreements between russia and turkey

their position, and erdogan did not understand their position and has not understood what happened in crimea in 10 years. how do you, roman, assess the position of erdogan, who does a lot for ukraine, recognizes territorial integrity, says that crimea is ukrainian, and at the same time tries to create some joint projects with putin? well, apparently, this is called politics and foreign policy, in general, now recep erdogan, in the issue of crimea , it must be emphasized, turkey has never had it. of such double-mindedness or duality positions, we heard a lot from various european politicians, sometimes even in the status of vice prime ministers, the turkish language here... is absolutely clear from the very beginning of the seizure of the ukrainian crimea, and for that i thank them, because even you see, 10 years have passed , and when these various plans

are heard, they all, even western politicians, see it as the impossible return of crimea, although in reality everything rests again on the number of missiles that we receive from our partners, there is a military-technical way for that... so that it to carry out this operation, and in fact all nato generals know this very well, ah, this mantra of dmitry piskov, that these are disagreements, there is something else, he has been repeating it for 10 years, ah, in fact, nothing will change, including that from this conflict, from the conflict, from the russian invasion, turkey is one of the states that is the recipient of bonuses in every sense of the word, so their position is clear, but in matters of principle, you know, as international law, it does not prohibit in

the war to ban your neighbors, but what it is clearly written there about the inviolability of borders, territorial integrity, it is 100% on our side, so it seems that vvh, after all, in the near future... he does not visit turkish people there, it seems to me that he has not been to ankara after the 14th year , in fact, it is in ankara, by the way, if we talk about the position of erdogan himself, we can recall how a russian plane actually once violated the territorial space of turkey, and the turks , without thinking at all, simply shot it down, well, that is, from syria, it flew into the territory turkey and then moscow, there are some tomatoes they didn't want to buy turkish or whatever the boycott was announcing. erdogan, but after all, the country of turkey is a big country, it has a lot of resources, and thank god that turkey is on our side, it is very important from the point of view

of the black sea, from the point of view of the recognition of our territorial borders and our independence. another character this week who started talking about plans to end the war in ukraine, or? his attitude to the war in ukraine of the russian federation, this is donald trump, there was a debate between kamala harris and donald trump, he is not very good at something clearly articulated, it's obvious after that the candidate for vice president of the united states of america, vance, came out and he announced that presidential candidate trump's plan to end the war may involve creating. demilitarized zone in the ukrainian territories occupied by russia and ukraine's refusal to join nato, let's hear what vance said. i think it

will look like this: trump sits down and says to the russians, ukrainians and europeans: you guys need to figure out what a peaceful settlement looks like. and it will probably look like it roughly the same as the current dividing line between russia and ukraine. it will become like a demilitarized zone. it will be strongly fortified so that the russians do not invade again. roman, do i understand correctly that vance, through whose mouth trump is saying that they are allowing the conflict to be frozen along the line, along the current front line, and that russia will control part of the territory of ukraine, and that suits the republican presidential candidate donald trump. well, they told others about it. but there is another important nuance here: do you remember when you voted in the congress these billions of ukraine, then

a decision was made there that it is legislative, that the white house should explain the plan of action and the goals of the current administration of joseph biden after the war, so what vance will say, it is... worthy, it resonates very strongly phrases such as values, international law and blah, but let's ask ourselves a question for a second, the fact that the candidates for vice president are, as i said, disgusting, that's understandable, but, but they clearly declare, and there is a lot, important the nuance is that this border will be strengthened so that they do not go further. it's me simply to the point that this is no longer the worst option for us, it is not at all clear what is meant by a demilitarized zone, occupied because of the territory, well, it is occupied, that there cannot be a demilitarized

zone. they do not react to this, but to be clear, you need to study all the statements of american politicians, but for this to be considered in practice, they must win the elections, there are nuances, or they will win or, well, i will return to the wrong time, which will be, but to our present moment, so someone heard a clear plan, biden, and what is he it's real, because, american generals, they, like other generals in democratic states, set a military-political task, and they take into account the number of missiles, so i understand that the president of ukraine is going to come to washington right now and say: "joe, we 've heard, and this, well, i've also heard it many times, that somehow, in order for you to..." well remembered,

so for you to remember well, you have to bomb them, you have to kill them, not a game game, and you can go there, you can't go there, and so on, that's where the most important thing arises, because i'm just to that the rhetoric is largely different, and that in practice, let's put a big question mark, and even after... joseph biden, it could be worse for us. thank you, roman, for the conversation, it was roman tsymbalyuk. i remind you that this is a ukrainian journalist, blogger, a person who has a large youtube channel. join roman tsimbalyuk's youtube channel. thank you, roman, for the conversation, all the best. well, the very end of the program, friends, i will say that the international film festival in toronto decided to cancel the screening of the film russians at war, in russian.

skis of anastasia trofimova, who whitewashes the russian invaders fighting in ukraine. the consul general of ukraine in toronto oleg nikolenko expressed outrage at the intention of the international film festival in toronto to show the tape of the russian director russians at war, quoting the consul general of ukraine in toronto. it is appalling that the festival defends its decisions to show the russian propaganda film, russians at... war, by justifying its funding with the funds of canadian institutions, particularly in a situation where one of these institutions has already withdrawn its an internal investigation showed support for this film, and the consul general writes about this on his facebook, and it is truly a shame that the russians allow the russians to enter the international film festival and allow the film russians at war to be shown, to justify, as it were, those who are fighting against. ..

of ukraine. friends, throughout our broadcast, i remind you that we are conducting a survey, there will be this survey in the second part of our program, which will start at 21:15. we are asking you today whether the permission to kill in the depths of russia will bring the victory of ukraine closer western missiles. so what are our viewers talking about? let's look at the results of the interim survey. 89% say yes, 11% - no. eh, we will continue this survey in the second part of our program, news from the bbc is waiting for you ahead of you, in 15 minutes we will return to the studio, we will have my colleagues in the studio, larisa voloshina and kateryna nekrecha, we have a traditional journalistic club on slaughterhouses, i hope you will be happy to join our program, so i will say goodbye to you for a little while, stay tuned espresso tv channels, watch bbc news.

ukraine may be allowed to use storm shadow missiles for strikes on the territory of russia, according to american officials. there are no confirmations, while putin intimidates the west, says it will mean war between russia and nato, draws another red line that can be crossed. we are talking about this on the bbc broadcast live from london, i am evgenia shedlovska. british prime minister kirstarmer is in washington where he is meeting with joe biden, and they are expected to discuss authorization for of ukraine to strike on the territory of russia.