the bones of weapons and whether ukraine's partners in the western world will stand on these rails of war also have a significant impact on whether ukraine will be able to win in the russian-ukrainian war. we will wait for the decision of our partners, obviously it will be discussed at the meeting between joseph biden and kyr starmer, because the talks in washington are about to take place. tony the leaders of the two countries of great britain and the united states of america, announced for friday the 13th, we hope that friday the 13th will be a happy one for ukraine. so far so far there is no news from washington, but we are waiting for comforting news, including regarding ukraine's permission to strike the territory of the russian federation with western weapons. however , a lot of international conferences and meetings took place in kyiv this week. our western partners participated. platform

, the yalta european conference was held in kyiv today, and at this yalta european conference, zelenskyi reprimanded his partners for not wanting to help ukraine repel attacks, including terrorist ones, from the russian federation, said that only one country is currently shooting down russian shahedis, besides... it is belarus, such irony was on the part of zelensky, let's listen to how it was when we hear that new missiles have arrived in russia for iran, this is the same evil, which the allies have already had to shoot down in the sky of the middle east, if the allies together shoot down missiles, shoot down a drone, in the sky of the middle east, then why is there still no... logical

solution about the joint shooting down of russian missiles and iranian shaheds in the sky of ukraine, and this is not done even when the missiles and drones are heading literally to the territory of our neighbors, only belarus was distinguished by the downing of russian shaheds. well, this is one of the elements of the kvartal 95 studio, not the european yeltsin conference, the joke seems to be a good political one, but it is not clear, colleagues, why president zelensky is trying to do everything during this long period, it is clear why he is convincing western leaders to give permission to strike on the territory of the russian federation, it is not clear why our western partners... are delaying this, what is, on your

opinion, the reason why our western partners restrain ukraine and try to postpone the decision regarding strikes on the territory of the russian federation, larisa. well, i think that firstly, there are not many options left to show putin some red lines that the west is willing to cross, after putin commits another e. another war crime, another murder, because now we are appealing to what: iranian missiles, here they have appeared, this is already something new, it is officially recognized, at least one of the officials of iran said it directly, and that's why let's say, let's cross some red lines that you have set for yourself, regarding that putin, the west understands that this is what they are talking about, they have an escalation management strategy, as they call it. and

they say that when putin does something, we also take some step to show him our displeasure, and there are not many of these steps left, because sanctions have been introduced, secondary sanctions have also been introduced for six months, and they are also getting stronger, all this is good, all this is really works for our victory, we see that ukraine receives weapons, high-precision weapons, long-range weapons, airplanes, on, on, it all goes on, but on the other hand, there is an awareness that the war can last a long time, this is their illusion that... putin can wage a war for a long time, it seems to them that it is possible, although in reality , as we can see in fact, neither russian the economy, nor the russian, the russian military, they are not capable of a long war, this is the same bluff, but nevertheless it is necessary to demonstrate that, as they say, if putin does something else, we will push some red line, i think that these are delusions , that is, from this side, and me too, you know, here i am i just wanted to add that it is very symbolic that... the words about the next red lines that

the west must dare to cross were said precisely on the yalta platform, because let's remember that ukraine, the ukrainians also had their own red... lines , it happened precisely in crimea, we saw them when the russian army left the barracks, when it began to block ukrainian parts, when this occupation, annexation, attempt actually began annexation of crimea was absolutely defiant, absolutely demonstrative, then we faced the situation that many ukrainian military, ukrainian policemen on the territory of crimea were not ready to use weapons, that is, it is a shock, russia is behaving defiantly, and codes when you encounter this defiantness. it is very difficult to raise arms, and therefore, when volodymyr zelensky calls on our western partners to start shooting down these drones, these missiles, in fact, it is primarily for their benefit, they do not understand this, but if putin ever dares to take more daring actions against nato countries, and this can be against

the baltic countries and against the airspace of the same sweden, as we saw it recently, one must have strength, one must already be morally ready. to fight back here and now, because otherwise, the west may find itself in a situation where they will simply be morally not ready to use weapons against the russian federation, so for me it is also the red lines that they are building there and how we are trying to force them to cross them is not only for our sake, it is for their sake. thank you, larisa, kateryna, you have followed this whole series of information during this week as well. and that's how they were accompanied by each other the international forum, the second international forum, the statements of zelensky, the statements of blinken, who was in kyiv, and obviously, obviously, starmer was also in kyiv, did you have

the feeling that our partners would say, well, that's it , we give you permission to strike on the territory of the russian federation, because i personally, because... i had a feeling that this would happen, well, by the end of the week and that we would have such a result, especially since the guardian wrote about the fact that they say, well, the americans still doubt whether to give us permission to strike attacks specifically on the territory of the russian federation, but storm shedov will definitely fly over the territory of the russian federation, and there is always an expectation, and we understand that the us secretary of state does not just come to such companies. yes, here i want to reflect on what mrs. larisa said about, and reminded of this moment, russian troops were in crimea, the russian army had its bases on the territory of ukrainian crimea, and then began to occupy this ukrainian crimea, i

wonder, if you talk to a 17-year-old person, a child is no longer a child and a person, how to explain this, but what was the russian army doing in general on the territory of sovereign ukraine there, it seems to me, if we also return to those, well, not fears, but perhaps arguments, why the measure does not work as it should ukrainians wanted, not so radically, not so quickly, not so boldly, but this is putin's statement that was issued on thursday regarding the fact that this permission in ukraine to strike with western weapons on the territory of russia, what would this mean direct participation of nato countries. the russian-ukrainian war, probably, it was this moment, direct participation in the russian-ukrainian war, that was the main issue of this red line, so that this would not happen, although, de facto participation in this war is taken by everyone who helps with a penny or weapons, obviously, about

what i think we have to see, well , so many meetings, visits, different statements this week that we have to see. some result, this is all happening against the background of the presidential election in america, the beginning of the week was and you and i watched the debates, democrat harris and republican, republican trump, globally, in context, the question of peace was raised again, and from trump's vice-presidential candidate, jaydee vance , there was a clearer, but still blurred version of how the end of the war with the gray could ... look zone on the territory of ukraine, and this, of course, cannot please ukrainians, on the contrary, it speaks of two points: either that these things sound in opposition, perhaps

to the candidates of democracy, or perhaps it is that indeed, as the trump team and trump himself think, but he himself is not yet engaged to express such... specific things in public, so that if this or rating him does not interfere or whatever, it is perceived, but nevertheless these conversations escalate, and so... the western media also wrote about what biden has there there is already a plan for the victory of ukraine, zelenskyi says that he will be ready to present a plan for the victory of ukraine by the end of the year, and to the team of the democratic candidate and the trump team, that is, something is happening, the issue of these really red lines, they are constantly pushed, but we also see that it is russia strengthens its cooperation. with its partners, and those iranian missiles, they are also a reminder that here, by the way, about

larisa's thesis, is russia ready for a long war, and sometimes it seems that with such a partnership, with such long-term agreements, with such the support that russia has, with such a pace, albeit slow, but progress at the front, with huge sacrifices of its military, with huge losses of manpower and equipment, russia still, in spite of everything, meter by meter, wants to advance, then it is possible, after all russia is ready for a long war. the question here is to what extent the western partners will be ready to push their red lines so that ukraine does not simply endure and somehow stand for years, but that ukraine wins and as soon as possible. katerina, you mentioned what putin said in response to the announcement, perhaps. not a decision regarding our western partners, regarding weapons, the use of weapons on

the territory of the russian federation, but these weapons are used, well, not long-range, but in general, the weapons of our western partners are already on the territory of kurshchyna, that is, the armed forces are not there entered with soviet equipment or post-soviet equipment, it entered including those tanks and armored vehicles that were produced by our... partners and uses weapons there, including on the territory of the russian federation, and putin during these two and a half years years constantly talked about the fact that russia is at war with nato, and their propaganda machine constantly spun the mantra that russia is not at war with ukrainians, they are fighting on the territory of ukraine, but with nato countries, that's why putin's thesis is that now nato is entering the war. against russia, well, it is not that convincing, well, maybe it can be convincing only in one case, if

russia will use nuclear weapons, it will say: well, it is nato that has already attacked us, but larisa, or maybe in the current situation , putin should use this one on the highest card, the ace, get the nuclear ace and say: well, now i will beat all the cards, and we will actually put an end to this. the fact is that... he talks about it for so long and for so many reasons, i will remind you that nuclear blackmail sounded very clearly, just laugh about it to hit the crimea, that's all, radioactive ash, and what, when he puts forward his demands, he says: now nato has entered the war, well, if you give such permission in kurshchyna, and what they wrote in their constitution , zaporizhia, kherson, donetsk, luhansk oblasts of crimea. it is not russia, it is not the weapon used there, well, from the point of view of putin himself, and then what? at this moment, the party had

the opportunity to actually show pride, but what? and here i think that for putin, for him, he is blackmailing with nuclear weapons, it is his, you rightly say, sergey, this is the last argument, and when it is the last argument, he cannot use it, because after that he has nothing, absolutely nothing, moreover, there are big ones. experts have questions about the combat capability of this nuclear arsenal to be used against whom, well, against the united states, but i just want to understand what he plans to fight, that is, he will withdraw his troops near pokrovsk, go take washington and london, well, this is all madness, this nuclear of his weapons, well, we see the quality of his latest weapons, all these analogues have no again, we know that in 2014, by the way, just after the occupation of crimea and the start of the war in donbass by this military company of putin's,

ukraine stopped servicing the russian nuclear arsenals, and that satan's missile, which they called the sarmatians, they cannot repeat it in any way , it does not fly with them, they have already during this entire period not been able to repeat a single missile carrier, which at one time was supplied to them by ukraine, moreover, ukraine served precisely their nuclear ... potential, all this fuel, all this other, not the fact that russians generally know how to do it, so it's a big question of what he can do, but he can blackmail, and if he just tries to use... nuclear potential, well, it won't have an effect, it's suicide, it's just plain suicide , yes, maybe he will take with him a certain number of people, a large number of people, but for him personally this is the end, and what is the profit from all this as a result, because after that, even if it is not a blow

nuclear countries, such as nato countries, and by a country such as ukraine, or by a neutral one a country on which putin will not be able to use this scarecrow after this, it is the only and last one he has, i very much doubt that he is capable of somehow having such a large number of nuclear weapons and really starting a nuclear war, he is not in a position to end it, this will be its end, not the end of humanity, and zelensky at today's yalta european conference, or the yalta european strategy, it's so called, also outlined the fair, fair ways of ending the russian-ukrainian war. let's hear what said the president of ukraine. wars of aggression, such as russia's war against ukraine, can end fairly in a number of ways, either the occupying army is pushed out by force or

by diplomacy, ensuring that the country's real independence is preserved and cleansed. from occupation, in both the first and second cases , ukraine needs strong positions, and the united states can help with this. ekaterina, apparently, zelensky is now setting a meeting, a future meeting with president biden, and obviously, it will be somewhere between september 25-30, when it will take place meeting of the un general assembly. our president is flying to the united states of america and will meet with biden there, and obviously this victory plan, which he is talking about, and this plan, obviously knows zelenskyi’s closest circle, and well, ukrainian society has not yet been informed about the details of this victory plan, but the president clearly says that

the united states of america can help with all of this, or is it time for washington to implement a victory plan? zelenskyi, well , ukraine. colleagues, you know that i am here now i'm watching the news, gromadsky reports information from reuters that they have already said in washington that the us does not plan to announce any changes in the policy of using western weapons, long-range missiles for strikes on the territory, this was said by john kirby, an adviser to belyagodom of communications in the field of national security, he said that in the united states. direct participation in this war, while we see that the news in this sense is disappointing for ukraine, indeed the period with the us elections, it is just some kind of 50-50 roulette, none of the experts who deeply understand

american politics, is not ready to say what to expect from kamela garis until the end of the incomprehensible. although it is obvious that in the majority it will continue the politics of joseph biden if he is taken as the president of the united states, and on the other hand trump and the trump team are revealed, as if even more, but it is still the same and it is not clear where the roulette can return there, how it can to play that, which is surely a big factor, is how the american public will react. and will support certain statements or plans from american candidates, because we are we understand that the elections will be held in the new year, and a new president will fill everything in the usa, that is, we are waiting, of course, to see what biden's plan for the victory of ukraine will be presented there, but it can only be implemented if such a malagasy

is obvious she will become president there, and now those statements and all statements. that come from the candidates, they can be aimed, among other things, at checking the reaction of american voters, looking at how the ukrainian issue will affect the rating of this or that candidate, and here, on the one hand, the shaky foundation under the ukrainian question, on the other hand, public opinion in america can play some other role, in general, a fair conclusion. in principle, this war is unfair, and of course, the victory of ukraine and the preservation of territorial integrity, the return of ukrainian territories, this can be called a fair conclusion . nevertheless, those losses, both human and territorial, and destroyed cities, and cities to which some of our fellow citizens will never be able

to return, because they simply do not exist, and relatives who are simply not there because of this war, that is, no matter how fair the end of the war was on paper, it is still the result with great, huge losses, of course it is interesting whether the vision and those plans... which are being worked on in office of the president of ukraine, and with the vision that exists in the white house today, it is interesting, but all the previous statements tell us somewhere that what is for ukraine, for ukrainians is fair, in particular the return of all territories under the ukrainian control of kyiv, and the fact that ukraine must win, which means defeat. russia, all this raises the question to which you and i have heard the answer before, well , it seems that the west is not ready for the defeat of russia, although they are ready to support ukraine to

the end, as western leaders have stated more than once. thank you, katerina, and to finish this topic, larisa, do you think we will hear comforting news from washington, and this delay with this decision regarding giving ukraine the right to use long-range weapons on the territory of the russian federation. how does this threaten the russian-ukrainian war, well, the development of the russian-ukrainian war specifically for ukraine? well, look, in my opinion, after the beginning of the kursk operation, it is obvious that ukraine did not have permission to use these leopards and hymers, which, by the way, are also american weapons on the territory of kursk, but when we went there and started doing what we we do, well, everyone was forced to agree, moreover, then there was a statement, and the same kirby talked about the fact that ... they do not see any violation of american red lines regarding the use of american weapons, he said that in response to madame zakharova's tantrum about the fact that look, look, this

is an american weapon, my god, my god, and then he said, no, no, we don’t see it, but immediately there came some idea that no, no, no, we don’t see it here, but there are some attacks that are so terrible that no, here, here we have yes, here we have red lines, so then the united states could just pretend that everything is fine. and not to start putting out some specific nomenclature of own weapons, when other weapons are already used for, as the russians call it, canonical american territory, i think they will continue these negotiations with putin, this is all an attempt to make curtseys, again, they are ready for the defeat of russia there, they are not ready for the defeat of russia there, this is a very strange story, because i will remind you that under during the first world war , germany lost, it was advancing, its army... stood less than 100 km from paris, not a single foreign soldier, not a single one was not on the territory of germany, but germany lost this war when its soldiers were on

another territory, why, because it lost an army, and now russia risks precisely this loss, but the question is different, when germany then had the opportunity to increase its military potential in several decades, including at the expense of such allies as stalinsk. russia, in general, began the continuation of the first world war, that is, the second. in this case, the loss or not of russia is not the result of the desire of the united states not to think about itself there. this is the result of the madness of vladimir putin, who destroys in idiotic, absolutely, excuse my french, attacks, well, well, absolutely not unreasonable to pass a meter, two or three, he destroys dozens, units of equipment, he destroys entire platoons and companies and battalions of his own people, well , that is, well, you can’t do that, he behaves like

a player who bets everything he has is on the line, including his wife, his horse and his last pieces, that is, he is a gambler, and here he is doing it, he, he is burning his army, he is her burns, and at some point he'll get to a point where he just... won't be able to continue the war, so it's not the united states, this is what he said, these are not my words, these are timati snyder, who said that the west cannot save russia from defeat, no matter what he does, but there is another story, very important, the west can prevent ukraine from winning , which actually happens from time to time, in this case, when we see this plan of the united states for the victory of ukraine, well, it's not really a global plan for our victory, it's ... that the administration has to come up with a plan within a few months, and so they provided a plan for those 61.

billion, six of which are already burning, because the congress has to shuffle them somewhere, this is the whole question of redistributing the 60 billion that they allocated to help ukraine, of which real aid is not 60, but less than 20 billion, and which still need to be used in due time, so there is no need to build illusions that the united states knows how to defeat putin and force him to surrender, no, they are not busy with that right now, but the question is that we we should be busy with what we should be busy with. then stand, because we have no other choice. thank you, thank you larisa. friends, i would like to remind you that we are working live on the tv channel, as well as on our platforms in youtube and facebook, we are conducting polls throughout our broadcast and we are asking you whether the permission to kill in the depths of russia with western missiles will bring ukraine closer to victory. everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, write your opinion in the comments under this video, if you watch us on tv, vote for the numbers 0800 211 381, yes 0800. 211 300 211 382 no, all

colleagues, calls to these numbers are free, at the end of the program, we will sum up the voting results. there are a few more events that happened this week that require my comments , and i hope that we will go over these events briefly but meaningfully, these events, for example, i was struck by three events that took place in smila. in frankivsk and in kyiv, when servicemen of the armed forces of ukraine or veterans were beaten, and in smila, it happened on september 3, it became known this week, on the streets of smila, in cherkasy region, a local resident beat a former serviceman who tried to solve the traffic conflict that occurred the day before with the parents of a military man, the police detained the suspect on september 11, the court sent him

to custody. well, they say that he is some kind of criminal authority, well, no, it's not important, the main thing is that it became public, this information became available, and the police just started to deal with it. in frankivsk, on september 11, three young men beat a participant in the hostilities in the center of ivano-frankivsk, before that a verbal conflict arose between them, which later turned into a fight, and a random passerby got who tried to intervene. the police detained three attackers, they admitted their guilt and. also, on the same september 11, in kyiv , three unknown persons beat metropolitan klyment of crimea and simferopol, who is a serviceman, by the way, of the armed forces of ukraine. the attack took place when he was on his way to the mykhailiv monastery. so, kateryna, all these facts indicate that something is wrong with ukrainian society, because those who wear pixels become them. that is

, by the object or subjects that are exposed beatings and in general, in general, people do not understand that these people, in principle , ensure your peace, peace in the country and risk their health, and sometimes even their lives, in the fight against the russian invaders, what is wrong with ukrainians? i would not ask the question like that, because any of these cases that happen, which are in the news. expand very much, they do not characterize the whole society as somehow sick, as somehow not so, the majority of society obviously understands the importance of the work of military personnel, the majority of society has either or exactly is attached to, or has family members attached to the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine, who protect there and also we see among them tired servicemen who can go to the christmas tree there or stay in conditionally

peaceful cities after being wounded. of ukraine and we can see them also in different conditions, well, this is a part of society from among the people who left and joined the ranks of the armed forces of ukraine. this morning, the zpresso viewer had the opportunity to see svoboda ranok on the air, we talked about this topic, and we also talked with the patrol police, there they say that there is no separate qualification, like the presence of military personnel, obviously, according to the criminal code, usually such cases are qualified there as ... hooliganism or causing bodily harm, indeed, what was seen in smill, this is what happened to develop after the society found out about what happened there, and then there was already information about some criminal authority that he was detained, and olena berezhna, spokeswoman for the national police, told us on the air that in smillie, the district police chief, he is now suspended.