population, in russia 130, russia can replace the population in crimea, increase it, which is what it does, they have been doing it for a long time, blur the role of the crimean tatar people, ukraine cannot do this objectively and it is not interested in it, let it be consciously to do, russia is interested in this and it is being done deliberately, if you put yourself in the place of erdogan, you will understand that it is beneficial for you that crimea is ukrainian, even without any emotions, just clean cold calculation, along with that you want to maintain a relationship with russia, because it is economically beneficial for you. tourists, profit from the fact that you help russia circumvent sanctions, and with that, you have to balance here not to fall out with the west, so you explain this relationship with russia by the fact that you want to be mediators, and brics me in this situation does not bother me much at all, andrei, i have already said that i believe that brics is not a russian, but a chinese kilb, and it is very important for erdogan to be part of the global south, if russia no... was in

brix, he would have gone there too, even me said, he would be more likely to go to brics than if russia were not there, because the very presence of russia in brics erodes the concept of the global south. russia is not the global north. this is global north. yes, this is global north, absolutely. so, all the other countries that are there are countries of the global south. and in this situation, of course, erdogan continues to balance. and we could assume that if he submits an application to brics, then he will not speak so harshly on the crimean platform, the very fact of his appearance on the crimean platform, this is already the second time, it seems to me that he made a similar statement last year as well, he is already infuriating the russians quite a lot, because i remind you that when the crimean platform began in 2000 20 the first year, it was probably the anniversary independence 55, how many?

20 years of ukraine's independence, 30 years in 2021, 30 years in 2021, and he wasn't there, the then minister of foreign affairs of turkey was there, the inhuman shoglu, came, but erdogan did not speak before the participants of the summit, and now he is for the second time stands out, and of course, this pisses off putin and company, because he is talking about the territorial integrity of ukraine, precisely when talking about crimea, which is always the most rare place for russians. well, as we can see, erdogan will, of course, continue to sit on these two chairs, and of course, we will also observe various kinds of assistance to russia from the side of turkey, and, conditionally speaking, support of ukraine at certain moments, such a position, nevertheless of this state.

glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on the air of the espresso tv channel, the west studio program, we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular we will analyze the situation with the so-called negotiations, overt and hidden, there are extremely many signals, but we understand that there are only a part of them. language as a veil. our guests today are the extremely informed daniel frith and oleksandr morozov. now the iconic american diplomat, ex-coordinator of the united states state department on sanctions policy, ambassador daniel frith will be on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, dear mr. ambassador, i am glad for you see espresso on air. glory. well, it's an extremely difficult situation. we understand that there is a question on the table now. permission for our

military to use american weapons, british weapons, in general the weapons of the euro-atlantic community for strikes on military facilities on the territory of the russian federation, we understand that extremely difficult debates have been going on, but there is hope that maybe we will receive this permission, and the key story is to get enough ranged weapons, yes, because clearance is extremely important, but the number of... certain units that can fly to strategic russian airfields, is no less important. i hope that the united states and the british government will lift restrictions on ukraine's use of long-range weapons for self-defense. in my opinion, ukraine should abide by the laws of warfare without any other restrictions. ukraine was attacked for no good reason, and i believe the biden administration. considers his next steps. i very much

hope that soon a decision will be made to remove these restrictions. i understand that some people are worried about russian. yes, russia has nuclear weapons, but we also have them. we must allow ukraine to defend itself according to the laws of war. but no other restrictions are appropriate. at one time, 100 years ago, the polish prime minister paderewski, addressing his british colleagues, asking for weapons, asking for ammunition, he... said that the poles were paying with blood in order to maintain the versailles order, as well as now ukraine is paying with its blood in order to maintain the world order, world, international treaties and so

on, and we understand that we need a closer cooperation, a clearer strategy, a joint strategy, yes, which would allow us to win as soon as possible... we are talking about ukraine and, accordingly, i would like to ask you about the so-called plans, your vision, your feelings about what is called the ukrainian victory plan, because a certain for some time there was such a concept to prevent ukraine from losing, but the victory of ukraine and not the loss of ukraine are significantly different things, but in any case, ukraine pays with the blood of its best children. for the international order to be respected. you have it is true that ukraine is fighting for the principles of what we are used to calling the free world. it is about the principles according to which some countries should not encroach on others for the purpose of conquest,

and that there should be no empires, but only nation-states living in peace with each other and respecting the rules of the international order. certainly. ukraine is fighting for exactly this, and it is supported by the united states, great britain and those countries that we are used to collectively call the free world. russia, on the other hand, is fighting for an empire, putin's the empire of greed and vanity, the russian empire of oppressing other peoples. this is not the path to stability, it is the path to lifelong conflict. ukraine rightly claims that its struggle is also ours. and the victory of ukraine will be the victory of the entire free world. we understand that american sanctions and european sanctions act rather slowly, but sometimes the moment comes when the russians start looking for food,

literally, i remember how at one time, in the late 80s, russians came to ukraine in order to to buy a sausage. accordingly, i do not know will this scenario be repeated now. but the more often i hear from representatives of the kremlin the words that the sanctions should be lifted, the more i understand that nabiulin and not only her are beginning to understand the situation in which their economy is, but at the moment it is standing, and at the moment we understand that the chinese the people's republic and india shouldered the russians , we have to change that, on the other hand , we understand that this requires the consolidation of all civilized... humanity, but on very sorry, we see different international signals that certain states want to play that game with russia, that is, we dump and buy cheaper resources, whether it concerns oil, whether it concerns gas and so on, and this

somewhat postpones the effect of the shock economy. the sanctions imposed on russia by the us, europe and the g7 countries have dealt a blow to the russians. economy, they caused pressure on the russian military machine, but this blow was not painful enough. implementing sanctions is like a game: you implement them, and the object of the sanctions tries to avoid them, you try to fight evasion methods, and therefore, the object finds new ways to avoid them. this is what is happening right now. in june and august, the biden administration for... carried out new sanctions aimed at evaders. these are good steps, but not enough. there are ways in which the united states and europe can increase the pressure on russia. for example, the usa and europe should as soon as possible decide on the use of frozen russian sovereign assets for

the benefit of ukraine. i would prefer to take all these assets, because it is about 280 or 300 billions of dollars and use them. to help ukraine. the alternative agreed upon by the g7 is to transfer to ukraine at least the interest earned on these immobilized assets. of course, this is not a bad amount, but apart from them, i would continue to insist on using the entire amount of frozen russian assets for ukraine's needs. this is what the us and europe can do. the second thing we can do is to increase the pressure on the sale of russian oil. price limits at which russia can sell its own oil is very expensive for her, but she finds ways. enter this sanction. we must focus our efforts on

limiting russia's financial capabilities through the oil and gas sector and other sources of income. it is important to find effective ways to reduce their income, in particular, by imposing additional sanctions and creating obstacles to the sale of oil. as for third countries such as china that are troop suppliers. this will apply not only to chinese companies, but also to banks cooperating with russia. it is important to make sure that help russia has become more risky and economically unprofitable for these countries. sanctions, as you pointed out, will not immediately collapse the economy, but they can create long-term pressure. which will weaken putin's ability to support this illegal and immoral war. mr. ambassador frith, i

would like to ask you about iran's containment strategy, yes? well, the information is already almost confirmed, that the ayatollah regime is transferring ballistic missiles to russia. yes, they are of different types, there is a different, different range of them, but we have no doubt where these will fly rockets, right? we, we don't know. whether they will kill me there, whether they will kill our translator there, whether they will kill one of the children, whether they will be directed at energy facilities, we simply do not know, but we know that iran has dared to do this , we understand that for them this is a wrong decision, and iran must pay for it, pay the full price of blood, on the other hand, we realize that we in ukraine, from the fact that some additional sanctions will be imposed on iran, well, it doesn't get any easier, that is, our blood is more important to us than the fact that the regime can start in iran

waver, and we understand how much ukraine and russian aggression against ukraine are connected to the situation, including in the middle east, and at the same time we are very worried that the regime of the ayatollah and the regime of the kremlin are beginning to converge in what is called the military component, we had other expectations from the updated new iranian. you are quite right that russia and iran are now acting as allies, a kind of axis of authoritarians has formed. china, russia and iran cooperate with other countries that hate the concept of a free world and believe that russia should be supported in its efforts to restore its empire, because these countries believe in empires and spheres of dominance, iran wants to be led'. a state in the middle east. russia wants to dominate the post-soviet space and the former

territories of central and eastern europe, and china wants to absorb taiwan again. instead , countries that value freedom, such as ukraine, poland, the european union, the united kingdom, the united states, and other free countries, believe in an order based on the principles of peace, cooperation, and sovereignty. this is not naivety, as it seems, but the basis of strategies that developed during the second half of the 20th century and continue to be relevant today. we share these values ​​together with ukraine, because we understand that the protection of freedom and democracy is key not only for ukraine, but also for our own national interests. this is what poland, the usa, ukraine and many others believe. because we know no alternative. this vision of a free world order is opposed to

the imperial one. it is a better and more efficient system. however, it is this order that putin hates it is his allies, such as iran, who are trying to destroy him. easy to say and not easy to do. it is easier to talk about a free world order than to oppose dictators and aggressors who seek to destroy it. however. we must take seriously the challenges of our time, because much depends on the outcome of the russian-ukrainian war. as an american, i can say that there will be fewer problems in the world if... ukraine wins, helping ukraine is not charity, it is in our interests, because our values ​​and interests are inseparable are related i don't know what the situation will be in the american budget now, or how actively the british government will work, but i know that in order to hold the country, we need more,

constantly more, such a sad logic of war that simply eats away. all the resources, that is, the war eats up money and so on, but there is also such a story as certain negotiation tracks, dear mr. ambassador, frit, so we understand that one or the other is going on, sometimes behind-the-scenes discussions, sometimes even public stories are going on at one time called istanbul summit with the participation of the russian side, and we understand what the kremlin is now counting on, that the unshakable... will of the collective action may be reduced in terms of financing and providing us with specific financial and military resources, that is, it is not a question of that it will be completely leveled, and on the other hand, the kremlin hopes that their tactics of destroying our energy system will be able to force ukrainians

to look at the war and the prospects for its end in a different way. i understand that this is too broad a field to talk about, but i would like to ask you now outline different scenarios that you think are realistic, yes, because there is mr. trump, there is ms. harris, there are a lot of different figures in the world, on which in principle our victory and the fact that our country resists russian aggression depends, well in any case , putin's plan is plus-minus. we've seen that over the last few years: sustained attacks, using ground strikes, missile strikes, and so on, but i'd like you to look at the different approaches in what's called a coercion perspective the negotiating table of the kremlin. in the west, there are ongoing

debates about support for ukraine, some. argues that the war is impossible to win, that russia will eventually achieve its goals, and that an early peace on russian terms should be insisted upon to stop hostilities. former president donald trump, during a debate with kamela harris, said that his goal is not to win ukraine, but only to end hostilities, presumably on putin's terms. there are many in the west who share this position. however, the leaders of the leading european countries, as well as the administration biden, continue to resolutely support ukraine. ukrainians now sometimes express concern over delays in american decisions on weapons systems and slow deliveries. i understand these complaints and agree with them. however, the biden administration has already done

a lot for ukraine, as has germany, for example. although sometimes germany's position seems... incomprehensible to me, it has also invested significant efforts in supporting ukraine. poland has also done a lot for ukraine. ukrainians are not alone in their struggle. discussions at the event are understandable, but they should end with a decision to continue supporting ukraine. during the pre-election debates, kamela garis strongly and repeatedly supported this idea. she criticized donald trump, claiming that he will be'. and all of europe. she used the language of harm to ukraine and will endanger the poland of american presidents such as harry truman and ronald reagan, who defended freedom and opposed aggressive dictators. many ukrainians would say that these are nice

words, but the americans must act faster and more decisively. support of ukraine, and i am with it i agree as i have already mentioned, i hope that the united states and great britain will lift restrictions on the use of long-range weapons by ukraine on the territory of russia. ukraine has the right to defend itself, and russia cannot expect its territory to remain safe while it attacks all of ukraine, killing civilians and terrorizing ukrainian society with bombs. missiles and attacks on energy infrastructure, worsening the life of the ukrainian people. russia has no right to any privileged status, i hope. that in the near future the united states states will lift these restrictions. i was pleased to hear how kamela garis spoke in defense of the freedom of ukraine. this shows that not

only joe biden supports ukraine, but also the younger generation of american leaders also understands that ukraine's struggle is our common cause. dear mr. ambassador, frith is one of my favorite poets. thomas stearns eliot once wrote a poem: barren lands, or desolate lands, yes, i would not like ukraine to become a desolate land, so we understand what we are talking about say because the russians are going to hit very clearly our civilian targets, so that 's not news at all, and accordingly, any major political or political military decisions, other than that they have to be bold, they have to... to be quite quick, and then there was information that the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyy presented certain elements of his plan, his vision to the american establishment, i do not

know what is included, well, it is probably a state secret, i don't know what is included in zelenskyi's plan, but in any case we understand that certain things must happen rather quickly, and there was information that a forum, a second forum dedicated to... the peace formula, could be held this year. in my opinion, ukrainian diplomacy during the last peace summit in switzerland was at its best. ukraine chose a wise approach, trying to reach the widest possible consensus on issues that would unite as many countries as possible, especially in the so-called global south. and in my opinion, the ukrainians coped quite well with this task, they managed to achieve progress in obtaining or will collect' brazil, which did not sign the statement, but

attended the summit. so i think it's quite possible that ukraine will make even more progress at the next peace summit. progress can be defined as the unification of a significant number of countries to support the maximum possible number of agreed ukrainian. positions i don't know what an agreement to end the war will look like, it's not for me to talk about, since i'm an american. what conditions will be decided by the ukrainians? i don't know how this war will end, but it certainly won't end with kiev blowing up russian flag. putin has already missed this moment. we, as a collective event, must prepare to strengthen the security of ukraine, so that after the end of this phase of the war... russia would not be tempted to start aggression again. ukraine should not remain in the gray zone, the danger zone on the other side of the front line, outside

the borders of nato and the european union. the gray areas are a green light for putin's further aggression. currently, in order to join the european union, ukraine must meet eu requirements. joining nato requires an agreement on how the alliance can help ukraine defend. himself. we in the west must realize that stability in europe depends on ukraine becoming part of our community. if this does not happen, russia will choose a convenient moment for its next strike. that is why, in the 90s, nato decided to accept new members from among the former satellite countries of the warsaw pact, which restored their independence. this decision was made because it was reasonable. that the gray zone is not a zone of stability, an eternal temptation for russian aggression. of course it is will require efforts from the ukrainians themselves.

there is no automatic right to eu membership. ukraine must meet his requirements. but i believe that after the war , the ukrainian people will insist on transformations that will be worthy of their huge sacrifices. they will want to build a european ukraine, and i am sure. that ukrainians will be able to achieve this. we must help ukraine achieve this goal. its future should be connected with nato and the european union. and as for the future of russia, it must depend from the choice of the russian people. thank you, dear ambassador frit, for this difficult, difficult, but honest conversation on the air of the tv channel. i want to remind our viewers. that ambassador daniel frith, ex-coordinator of the united states department of state for sanctions policy, was currently working for them. glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes. in

the latest issue of ukraine magazine, it is about the heroes who gave their lives for the freedom of ukraine. how does a country honor its defenders, how do loved ones communicate a loss, how does society choose a site for military cemeteries? heavy issues that cannot be ignored. ask at points about... or pre-pay online with the country at the center of the main events. in september, there are discounts on linex forte of 15% in the psaryznyk, bam and ochad pharmacies. in september, there are discounts on mukaltin, 10% in the pharmacies psyllanyk, bam and oskad. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is

vasyl zima, this is a big broadcast on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime. two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component. serhiy zgurets and what the world lives on. yuriy fizar is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morchavka field with me. and sports news. i invite you to talk. for two hours in the company of the favorite presenters of the cultural news, our tv viewer is ready to talk, good evening, presenters, who for many have become like a day , she is ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as the distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i greet you, good day, events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening for espresso. we are

servicemen of the griga separate unit, named after volodymyr griga, of the platoon of unmanned aviation complexes of the 76th separate battalion of the 102nd separate brigade. in the zaporozhye direction , combat clashes occur daily due to constant enemy assaults. this does not bypass the gulyaipil direction, which our battalion is already defending almost two years. currently we'. we need three times more means of correction and applying fire damage from the sky, so we are appealing to everyone who cares to collect funds for 20 judi mavic classic drones and 10 mavic 3t, yes, the amount is not small, but the lives of brothers and your relatives are much more expensive, we really hope for your support , donate and spread, let's not let the occupier take a step further together and accelerate the victory together, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, now on the air

oleksandr morozov will work on espresso tv, a well-known publicist, political analyst, who is in prague. greetings, oleksandr, glad to see and hear. good day, anton. good day to those who watch and listen to us. well, the key story is the so-called parameters of what is not there. in particular, we are talking about the negotiation process, which does not exist. everyone is talking about him and from time to time splashes of one or another plan reach us, and in general the situation reminds me of a room filled with some kind of cotton wool, yes, but this cotton wool is unfortunately full of blood and blood, in particular in ukrainian, we understand that certain processes are being carried out, certain signals and impulses are being transmitted, in such a way that, in principle, it briefly indicates that these or other negotiations are taking place in various capitals, i don't know, from india and beijing

to... the war with brussels , that they are talking about something, so we understand that we again have many questions for our partners and allies, which concern the supply of heavy weapons to us and permits for their use on the territory of the aggressor state, that is, the process is definitely underway, how do you see it and what are its main parameters? firstly i would say that we we have to be careful and cultured about clickable headlines, because all the time we... as media consumers, react that there is a headline, and someone has declared that he stands for peace, and every time it causes a violent reaction and a feeling that somewhere something is happening and it is being hidden from us, but in reality when leaders like olaf scholz or another european leader