with your quality and deep sleep dreamlight mattress pillowcase call on the 17th. o'clock in ukraine, bring to your attention a news release on the espresso tv channel. iryna koval works for you in the studio. we begin the issue with disturbing news in kharkiv. the occupiers ransacked the city with at least six cabs. it is already known about 35 wounded as a result of the russian strike. three children are among the injured. damaged civil infrastructure in nemyshlyansky district. in particular, the enemy hit a multi-story residential building and hit the 10th floor. there may be people under the rubble. fire in bought four floors from the ninth

to the 12th - informed the mayor igor terekhov. two adults are in a serious condition, there are also settlements in the targiv district, dergechiv district, there is destruction of civilian infrastructure, civilian enterprises in fact. the north of donetsk region has light again. specialists completed the repair of the power system after the morning russians. shelling, power supply was restored to sloviansk, kramatorsk, druzhkivka and kostiantynivka, the regional military administration reported. also the enemy of the morning twice attacked pokrovsk. one person died. the occupiers fired artillery, hitting an outbuilding near the gas station. the russians also shelled the western part of the city. in the last week, the defense forces eliminated more than 8.5 russian military personnel

, the commander of the ground forces, oleksandr pavlyuk, announced data on the losses of the occupiers. ukrainian defenders managed to destroy 44 tanks, about 170 armored combat vehicles, more than 300 artillery systems, six salvo systems and five enemy air defense installations. also, ukrainian defenders disabled more than 460 units of vehicles and 37 special vehicles of the enemy. in addition, thanks to the successful ones. of our soldiers, the russians lost a su-30 aircraft, four missiles and 370 operational-tactical level unmanned aerial vehicles. and in order for our military to fight even more effectively, the espresso tv channel and the vesna charitable fund opened a fundraiser for the purchase of modern drones and electronic warfare systems for the third separate assault, 110th and 47th brigades of the armed forces of ukraine. for... defenders on

donetsk direction, they hold back enemy attacks every day, defend our freedom and future. it was these soldiers who stood to the last and defended the avdiiv direction in the spring. therefore, the brigades urgently need drones and modern means of countering enemy drones. our goal is uah 3.5 million, and there will already be almost 2 million in the accounts. so, please join the collection using the qr code you see on the screen. good health, dear ukrainians, we are fighters of the first assault battalion of the third crimean assault brigade, who defend our native land on the front line, we urgently need your help, we need means of radio electronic warfare against the enemy's small bpola and kamikaze drones, we are asking for your help, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes , glory to the heroes, with a vyshyvanka in the heart. in zhovkva

, lviv region, more than 20 wives of captured, missing and illegally convicted military personnel in russia came to the main square of the city for a manifesto meeting. during the communication, special attention was paid to the psychological support of families. the participants of the action are sure that such meetings are not only important for the local military, but also for the international community, because they draw attention to the topic of prisoners of war, illegally convicted and missing persons. in november, women and children left. to paris with a touch of loss action to once again remind the world about ukrainian defenders. i am halyna mylostyva, i am the wife of the prisoner vitaly mylostyvy, he is a prisoner of war, at the moment he is in makiivka, his country was imprisoned by the aggressor for 29 years. such promotions are generally very important, because we want to remind world, we want to let people know and... so that people don't

forget, so that people remember that someone died for them, someone is in prison for them, someone doesn't see their family, and hasn't seen their family for years, today we want to attract the public. that the lives of ukrainian children, ukrainian citizens continue to hang like the sword of damocles. we want to draw attention to the fact that we need the whole world to know these barbarities, what the russian army is doing, russian aggression. we start with a pumpkin and end in paris, near the eiffel tower, with the women, mothers of the azov regiment. at such a time it is necessary to support those people who have experienced grief, and of course, to show the whole world that despite what they have lost. their husbands, they are women, they are strong, indomitable, walk, work and wear embroidered shirts, and this is their small protest, also a small information war. it is planned

to increase the term of basic general military training of servicemen. the corresponding project can be launched in october-november this year, - said the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine oleksandr syrskyi during a meeting with commanders of combat brigades and chiefs. educational institutions. the participants discussed problems that affect the quality of training of soldiers, as well as opportunities for improving training programs. currently, the creation of a school of instructors and the involvement of motivated training specialists with combat experience are being worked out. currently, on average , basic military training lasts a month. the usa plans to transfer a significant aid package to ukraine by the end of september. this was said by white house national security adviser jake sullivan on annual conference of yalton european strategy in kyiv. according to him, ukraine has repeatedly called for more air defense systems, and the us is currently in the process of receiving such systems

from its partners. he also noted that the united states of america is trying to help ukraine protect more energy infrastructure facilities. the us army suddenly transferred additional forces and resources to alaska. the move was necessary as a response to russia and china launching large-scale joint naval exercises in the pacific oceans - writes bizness insider. in this way, the united states demonstrated the ability to skillfully and inconspicuously transfer forces and assets even to the most remote places. in particular , hymars installations were moved from near washington to the north of the usa. means of communication with hawaii and other equipment and military forces. premiums for offline learning. in the zaporizhzhia region, teachers who work part-time will receive a 25% supplement to their salary. this amount is approximately from two to 2,500 hryvnias

every month, - said the head of the regional military administration, ivan fedorov. 45 teachers will receive additional payments. for this, you need about uah 60, which will be taken from the local budget and subventions. currently, 122 schools in the region are working offline. let me remind you that five underground schools are also being built in the region, where children study in shelters due to the proximity to the front and the danger of russian shelling. and six underground schools are being built in the kharkiv region, in particular, the construction of one such educational institution in the kharkiv district is planned to be completed in november. it can accommodate 300 students in several shifts. this one the school should become one of the safest facilities in the region with autonomous power supply and underground communications - said the head of the regional military administration oleg sinigubov. another 16 similar projects are under development. it is planned that

13,000 children will study offline in the kharkiv region this academic year. and more. look for interesting videos on the espres youtube channel, be sure to subscribe, because there are live broadcasts of ether, all news releases, programs and special projects that can only be seen here. also short videos on hot topics in the shorts section, share them, comment and be around. such were the news at that time. our team works to ensure that you always get the latest news on time, so wait for the next news release . greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda.

we have already approached the serpent himself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live drone attacks, kamikaze. political analysis objectively and meaningfully, there is no political season, exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest spots the front shot! freedom of life, frankly and impartially, you draw your own conclusions. vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv, andriy smoliy and invited experts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events based on facts. if you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday political club. every saturday at espresso. she actively

spoke about ukraine, and this was one of the key points in the debate. camila harris failed to personally negotiate with putin. trump would like to cut off substantial funding to ukraine as soon as possible. twice its host directly asked: would you like ukraine to win this war? with russia, donald trump is a disgrace to the united states, she has said this publicly several times and in this way has made trump mad. all debates were only about ukraine. no, a trump win, a harris win, or a tie. this is an obvious victory. you are watching the state situation video podcast, in which we talk about the elections in the states, in america, and the presidential elections. well, our navigator... the political pilot in the american election race will be a professor of political science at baylor university

serhii kudelya in texas. sergey, i congratulate you. hello, rostislav. greetings. so, we're going to analyze now the first election debate between kamala harris, the current vice president, and former president donald trump. they took place, let me remind you, on september 11 in philadelphia. these were the first and perhaps the only ones. election debate between trump and harris. the second point is interesting that it was their first face-to-face meeting in general. another interesting point: donald trump is considered the most experienced debater in america. this is his third election campaign. i will briefly recall 2016 year he debated several times with hilary clinton, and won this election. next is 2020, the debate with joe biden and trump lost that election. and now here is the election debate with kamala harris in the 24th year, kamala harris also had

debate experience, she debated vice president mike pence in 2020. who won today in philadelphia? what was said about ukraine and the war? i will say right away that it is clear that this woman was actively present during the debate, but she was not the first, not the most important. so let's start like this. still from ukraine, donald trump repeated his an approach that will end the war in ukraine very quickly, in 24 hours, they say, and even before he takes office as president, already after his victory, in the event of victory, he said that, and i will quote here, best suits the interests of the united states , so that the war ends, and still put an end to it, conduct negotiations on a peace agreement, because we have to end all this, so that people's lives are not destroyed. trump said that if he were

president, putin would not have attacked ukraine. for her part, kamala harris, what did she say? she actively spoke about ukraine, and this was one such key point in the debate. she said that if trump were really the president, then putin would have taken over ukraine, that now trump would be sitting in kyiv. she said: "if donald trump were president, putin would be sitting now." in kyiv and that putin would not have stopped in ukraine, he would have gone further to nato, in particular to poland, and haris added, by the way, that because of his friendship with putin, the russian dictator would be able to eat trump for lunch, even such a quote. so, we see disagreements, very serious disagreements in the ukrainian issue. sergey, how do you see these intransigence between garis and trump. well, actually, we haven't heard any new ideas. from trump or harris: we see trump trying to use ukraine

to point out the weakness of the biden administration. he notes the direct connection between the withdrawal of american troops from afghanistan and putin's decision to enter and start aggression against ukraine. we also heard some very interesting accusations against the biden administration that camila harris failed personally agree with putin to prevent war. although kamela harris answered him that in fact she had never met putin and that was not her goal. so, ukraine is once again considered primarily as an aid tool. which opponents try to blame each other, discredit each other's positions, and neither of the two candidates, neither trump nor kamela harris , have really talked in detail about how they're going to help ukraine end the war and how they're going to try to help ukraine win, and actually from trump we

heard that his main problem is that... that america spends too much money on ukraine, he mentioned the amount of 150 billion dollars, said that in fact it is the responsibility of europe, it is not the responsibility of the united states to help ukraine. so, we see such hints, indirect hints that trump would like to stop significant funding of military aid to ukraine as soon as possible and force ukraine to somehow make concessions to russia in order to achieve an end to hostilities. i am that noticed that trump several times exaggerated the number of victims of the russian war with ukraine, that is, he said several times about millions, that is, these are clearly exaggerated numbers, but he also accused kamala harris that she was recently supported by putin, whom, by the way, harris herself called a russian dictator. another interesting moment, which i will draw

attention to, he twice, twice his presenter directly asked if you would like... ukraine to win in this war with russia, he twice avoided a direct answer to this question, why? well, precisely because it seems to me, in trump's opinion, this victory impossible, and he believes that the war should end as soon as possible. in fact, he has said that he is going to put zelenskyi and putin at the negotiating table, even before he becomes president, it is not clear how he is trying to do that, and actually to ... get them to agree on something that zelenskyi will agree on with putin is also not completely clear, but here it is also important to realize that trump believes that all the problems of the world order will be solved by his return to the white house, precisely because he is perceived by world leaders as a strong political player who is able to not

only talk, not only threaten, but do ... concrete forceful actions, and he gave the example of his negotiations with the leader of the taliban, during which he directly threatened the leader of the taliban that he would destroy his family, will destroy his house if the taliban does not agree to peace agreements with the united states, so in this magical imagination of donald trump, his very return to the white house will help the united states, the united states to project power to ... other regions of the world and to resolve any conflicts that are currently occurring in the world. and i also noticed, by the way, that he bragged a little bit about the fact that other powerful world leaders said that they were afraid of his trump. several times, so to speak, he quoted the hungarian prime minister viktor orbán, whom he also called a strong politician, that this trumpian moment, such machismo, political, geopolitical, that others

fear me, are afraid and will be afraid, yes, you too noticed, just like that, and e. it is also important to note that kamela harris did not succeed only in the case of foreign policy, but on many other issues, to point out such weak points of donald trump and force him to defend himself all the time, to put himself in the position of a person who actually has to prove to others that he is stronger, that he is worth something, and it was very an important element of the debate, i think, which helped camila harris at the end of the eh... according to many observers to still win this debate, and when it came to foreign policy, she cited the military several times, generals who worked for donald trump, who worked in his administration, and who , after they left it, said that donald trump was a threat to the national security of the united states, she

also gave examples of statements by foreign leaders who said that donald trump is a disgrace to... the united states, she said it publicly, repeated it several times, and thus drove trump out of his mind, he was forced to defend his positions all the time. and i will also pay attention to what, when they talked about whether it was possible to turn away russia's war against ukraine, this aggression, this attack, haris said that she just met with zelensky a few days before the russian attack, and in general had five meetings with him in total, and that she tried to... warn that they say, maybe the attack is inevitable, she was passing on information from intelligence, that's what she wanted to do, to emphasize that she wanted to save ukraine, and trump said it right on the field.' on the fact that if he were the president, then putin would not have attacked, well, somehow, even here there are such differences, that is, even these contacts some, and that trump also said that

he met with zelensky, that he knows him personally very well, that is, this moment is such a warning, and they say, you did not do enough anyway, that is , this is the approach of the two electoral camps, and so on and it seems to me that trump believes that his personal relationship with vladimir putin is also important. a factor that would allow him to prevent the start of military aggression against ukraine. we thus see that in reality trump does not understand the deep root cause, the origins of this war, he does not understand that the war is not only about putin's perception of trump or anyone else, but about the global vision of vladimir putin and other dictators in the world on how to behave. authoritarian states, what are their goals, how do they want to conquer new zones of influence, new regions, or am i wrong, it seemed to me that there are still slightly different

approaches to the influence of the russian-ukrainian war on the world order, because trump said, as i noticed that russia is a nuclear power, and that this could lead to the third world war, and haris was just talking about the need to strengthen nato and help ukraine. further, that is, that putin will not stop at ukraine, that is , both trump and garis are concerned about the future and where russian aggression against ukraine can lead, but it is a little different, right? yes, and here it is important to note, and we will also talk about the topic of immigration a little later, and that trump's position and his emphasis, the threat of the third world war, the possibility of using nuclear weapons by russia, it resonates. with the position of many populist forces of the far right in europe, who are trying to sell voters the need for quick peace agreements between

russia and ukraine precisely under this discussion of the threats associated with a nuclear catastrophe, and the rhetoric that donald trump uses in matters of the ukrainian-russian war, as well as in matters of immigration and many other issues , it resonates very precisely with... the rhetoric of the far-right populists in europe, but here we see that actually donald trump is the key republican candidate, he is a very influential politician, the far-right in the majority european countries still remain rather marginal political forces that do not come to power, in the united states we see a completely different dynamic. uh, about nato, because this is also a very important and extremely interesting issue for the ukrainian audience. trump, he has an approach. he boasted that he was forcing the europeans to pay for american, so to speak, protection, security guarantees in nato and that they would continue to insist on this,

and kamala harris said that this is the most successful alliance in history and that everything should be done for strengthening nato ties with european partners, that is, as the future of nato, which, as trump sees him and as haris, serhiy sees him, trump's position is not only that ... other european countries should pay more for security, but the position trump's idea is even that if some countries cannot pay as much as is necessary to invest in the nato defense fund, then the united states will not guarantee their security, thus undermining the very essence of the agreements on which they were based the north atlantic alliance, when the security of one state is guaranteed by all others, and participation. in the defense of this state is not discussed, it is not questioned, and donald trump thus wants to revise the foundation on which all european

security and transatlantic security has been based since the end of the second world war, that is, these are very significant changes, which he does not directly, but apparently offers american voters. a few more foreign policy aspects that are not directly related to ukraine. so, the middle east, trump says. says: it is necessary to put an end to the war in gaza so that there is an agreement here, and that the war in gaza would not have started if he were the president. haris' interesting message was that she advocates two states in the future, a two-state solution, that is, for israel to exist as a state with security guarantees, and a palestinian state to emerge. next is afghanistan, you have already talked a little, the chaotic withdrawal, they say, of american troops from afghanistan, that too. trump insists that biden was too hasty with the chaos and casualties, while kamala harris insisted that it was trump who worked out the agreement with the taliban,

his... further on china, what we see, trump, jobs, china takes away, trade imbalance, and that we need trade, import tariffs on chinese products, kamala harris herself reproaches him that he used to admire, glorified all the depredations and admired the strong hand that they say rules such a large country as china. we see that there are disputes, what is the world now, what conclusions does the rest of the world draw for itself after... watching these philadelphia debates donald trump, kamala harris, what conclusions does the world for itself in their visions, in their approaches? well, donald trump perceives the world primarily in economic terms, that is , it is important for him that the united states maintains its economic power, so in his relations with china, he sees problems primarily in the economic sphere, he does not say much about china's authoritarianism,

he does not talk about desire to dominate china in its region, about the possibility of taking over taiwan, he says first of all that chinese cheap cars, for example, are going to come into the american market and destroy american jobs, and so this is a very pragmatic, non-ideological approach that was actually inherent in the administration of donald trump when he was president, kamela harris, on the contrary , emphasized all the time that the united states is not just... the issue of trade, not just the economy, it's politics and ideology, and that one of the tasks of the united states is to oppose autocracies in the world and authoritarian leaders, and that's what she emphasized that for donald trump authoritarian leaders are the role models he wants to emulate, he's proud of his relationships with various authoritarian leaders, said that she, he wrote love notes to the leader of north korea,

for example, and admired their relationship, so she wanted to emphasize that donald trump is absolutely not interested in maintaining the influence of american democracy in the world and supporting other democratic states. let's talk about other very important, even i would say, priority issues for americans, though so are the debates themselves, and in terms of the amount of time that this discussion took up, the issues of the economy, migration and abortion. dominated , however, so that our audience did not get the impression that all the debates were only about ukraine, no. let's start with migration, because there are really strong approaches and disagreements here, differences between the teams, between trump and harris. even, donald trump says that the administration of biden and kamal garis did not pay attention to migration, illegal migration to the states, that is, that it became a serious problem, even donald trump

has said that some are illegal. migrants are criminals who go to america, i.e. , those who come, arrive, sneak across the border are the worst, and he even said that some migrants, they say, allegedly eat cats and dogs there, domestic americans, that is, what was it at all, really we've seen almost every question donald trump has been asked, he's pivoted to immigration and constantly emphasized that camela. and joe biden, they are trying to destroy america by letting in millions of people from the outside from others countries this is a topic for donald trump, perhaps for him, he finds it winning, precisely because it fits into his vision of the future in the event that kamela harris wins. he paints all the time such apocalyptic scenarios, catastrophic scenarios of american decline, destruction

of american. state and he points to immigrants, to the millions of immigrants who come to the united states in his opinion and do all kinds of bad things, as proof that in fact for kamela harris the issue of immigration is not a priority, and therefore america will be destroyed from within, and therefore he also emphasizes that kamela harris during her vice presidency did not take any concrete steps to limit migration, she was actually responsible. for immigration issues at the beginning of the biden administration, and we see that the number of immigrants, it increased during the presidency of joe biden, and therefore for donald trump, it is important because it appeals to the concerns of ordinary americans.