legal force, i was inconvenient to the local government, in my opinion, and i applied to occupy an administrative position in this court, of course, this is your inner conviction, yes, i believe that this became the basis for creating an artificial such a criminal case. it is also known that in her scientific article olena panchenko, contrary to the rules, used information from a russian-language source, translating it through google translate. use, well, but it's a literal translation of three sentences, i don't know how, if you didn't use it, how it could get absolutely verbatim into your work. maybe i didn't accidentally link to, well, i'm not ready to say now, but of course, it wasn't on purpose. judge for 10 years. in kyiv and rents an apartment, allegedly according to

a verbal agreement, she assures that during this time she has not been able to find real estate with an official lease. since the 14th year, i have lived in the city of kyiv, in different periods in different apartments, i did not indicate that i live with relatives or relatives or somewhere else, i clearly indicated the apartments in which i live, this was necessary in order to be registered as an internally displaced person. and... i did not conclude an official written lease agreement with any landlord, so i actually did not mention it, about the lease. the owners of the apartments do not want to enter into such contracts, as they did not want to take us to these apartments and rent them out in the 14th year, that is exactly what is happening. in the end, the higher qualification commission of judges recommended that elena be fired panchenko. the submission should now be considered. the supreme

council of justice. for today, i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to tell about a dishonest judge, write to me on facebook or to the email address you see on your screens. see you in exactly one week. it's all good. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, the program studio zahid, we will analyze the most important events of this week, in particular, we will carefully analyze the situation with the so-called negotiations, overt and hidden, there are extremely many signals, but we understand that some of them are just smoke signals. curtain, our today's guests

are extremely informed daniel fried and oleksandr morozov. now the iconic american diplomat, ex-coordinator of the united states state department on sanctions policy, ambassador daniel frith will be on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, dear mr. ambassador, glad to see you on spresso. glory. well, it's an extremely difficult situation. we understand that now there is a question on the table. permission for our military to use american weapons, british weapons, and in general weapons of the euro-atlantic community for strikes on military facilities on the territory of the russian federation. we understand that there have been extremely difficult debates, but there is hope that maybe we will get that permission, and the key story is to get enough long-range weapons, yes, because the permission is extremely important, but the number of certain... units that

can fly to strategic russian airfields are no less important. i hope that the united states and the british government will lift restrictions on ukraine's use of long-range weapons for self-defense. in my opinion, ukraine should abide by the laws of warfare without any other restrictions. ukraine was attacked without any good reason. and i believe that the biden administration is considering. your next steps. i very much hope that soon a decision will be made to remove these restrictions. i understand that some are concerned about russian escalation. yes, russia has nuclear weapons, but so do we. we should allow ukraine to defend itself in accordance with the laws of warfare. but no other restrictions are appropriate. at one

time, 100 years ago, polish prime minister paderewski, addressing his british colleagues, asking for weapons, asking for ammunition, he said that... poles are paying with blood to maintain the versailles order, and so is ukraine now pays with his blood in order to maintain the world order, world international treaties and so on, and we understand that we need closer cooperation, a clearer strategy, a joint strategies, yes, that would allow us to win as soon as possible. we are talking about ukraine, and accordingly i would like to ask you about the so-called plans, your vision, your sense of what is called the ukrainian victory plan, because for some time there was such a concept that ukraine would not be allowed to lose, but the victory of ukraine and not

the loss of ukraine - these are significantly different things, but in any case, ukraine pays with the blood of its best children for the fact that... the international order was observed. you are right that ukraine is fighting for the principles of what we used to call the free world. it is about the principles according to which some countries should not encroach on others for the purpose of conquest, and that there should be no empires, but only nation-states living in peace with each other and respecting the rules of the international order. definitely ukraine. this is exactly what the united states, great britain and those countries that we used to collectively call the free world are fighting for. russia, on the other hand, is fighting for an empire, putin's empire of greed and vanity, the russian empire of oppressing other peoples. it

not the path to stability, it is the path to eternal conflict. ukraine rightly claims that its struggle is also our struggle. the victory of ukraine will be the victory of the entire free world. we understand that american sanctions and european sanctions act rather slowly. but sometimes the moment comes when russians start looking for food. in the literal sense. i remember how at one time, in the late 80s, russians came to ukraine to buy sausage. accordingly, i don't know if this scenario will be repeated now, but... the more often i hear from representatives of the kremlin the words that sanctions should be lifted, the more i understand that biullina and not only her are beginning to understand the situation in which their economy is, but for now it is standing, and for now we understand that the chinese the people's republic and india put

a shoulder to the russians and we have to change that, on the other hand we understand that this requires the consolidation of all civilized humanity, but... on it is a great pity, we see various international signals that certain states want to play that game with russia, that is, we dumping and buying cheaper resources, whether it 's oil, whether it's gas and so on, and it kind of postpones the effect of the shock economy. sanctions imposed on russia by the us, europe and the g7 countries have dealt a blow to the russian economy. they put pressure on the russian military machine, but this blow was not painful enough. the introduction of sanctions resembles a game: you introduce them, and the subject of sanctions tries to avoid them. you try to fight the ways of evasion, and

then the object finds new ways of them avoidance. this is what is happening right now? in june and august, the biden administration introduced new ones. sanctions are directed against evaders. these are good steps, but not enough. there are ways in which the united states and europe can increase the pressure on russia. for example, the usa and europe should as soon as possible decide on the use of embargoed russian sovereign assets for the benefit of ukraine. i would prefer to take all these assets, because it's about $280 or $300 billion, and use them to help. ukraine. an alternative to which the big seven agreed to transfer at least interest to ukraine. earned on these immobilized assets, which is about 50 billion dollars. of course, this is a good amount, but apart from them, i would continue

to insist on using the entire amount of frozen russian assets for ukraine's needs. this is what the us and europe can do. the second thing we can do. is to increase the pressure on the sale of russian oil. these new restrictions on how russia can sell its oil are costing it dearly, but it is finding ways around them. we have focus efforts on limiting russia's financial capabilities through the oil and gas sector and other sources of income. it is important to find effective ways to reduce their income, in particular, by imposing additional sanctions and creating obstacles to the sale of oil. as for third countries, such as china, which are suppliers of military products. this will apply not only to

chinese companies, but also to banks cooperating with russia. it is important to make russia's aid more risky and economically unprofitable for these countries. sanctions, as you pointed out, won't cause an immediate collapse of the economy, but they could create long-term pressures that... frith, i'd like to ask you about the containment strategy for iran, right? well, the information is already almost confirmed, the fact that the ayatollah regime is transferring ballistic missiles to russia, yes, they are of different types, there are different, different ranges of them, but we have no doubt where these missiles will fly, yes, we, we do not know, whether they want me there, whether they are beating our translator there, whether they will kill one of the children, whether they will

directed at energy facilities, we just don't know, but we know that iran dared to do this, we understand that this is a wrong decision for them, and iran has to pay for it, pay the full price of blood, on the other hand , we realize that for us in ukraine , the fact that some additional sanctions will be imposed on iran does not make it any easier, that is, our blood. for us is more important than the fact that the regime in iran may begin to shake, and we understand how much ukraine and russian aggression against ukraine are connected to the situation, including in the middle east, and at the same time we are very concerned that the regime of the ayatollah and the regime of the kremlin are beginning to converge in what is called the military component, we had different expectations from the renewed new iranian. the president you are quite right that russia and iran are now acting as allies.

a peculiar axis of authoritarians was formed. china, russia, and iran are working with other countries that hate the concept of a free world and believe that russia should be supported in its efforts to rebuild its empire because these countries believe in empires and spheres of dominance. iran wants to be a great power. in the middle east, russia wants to dominate the post-soviet space and the former territories of central and eastern europe, and china wants to absorb taiwan again. instead , countries that value freedom, such as ukraine, poland, the european union, the united kingdom, the united states, and other free countries, believe in an order based on the principles of peace, cooperation, and sovereignty. this is not naivety, as it seems at first glance. and the basis of strategies that developed during the second half of the 20th

century and continue to be relevant in our days we share these values ​​together with ukraine, because we understand that the protection of freedom and democracy is key not only for ukraine, but also for our own national interests. this is what poland, the usa, ukraine and many other countries believe. because we don't know the alternative, this vision of a free world order is opposed to the imperial one, it is a better and more efficient system, however, this is the order that putin hates and it is this order that his allies like iran are trying to destroy, it is easy to say and not easy to do, talk about a free world order is easier than confronting dictators and aggressors who seek to destroy it, but we must... take seriously the challenges of our time, because much depends on the outcome of

the russian-ukrainian war. as an american, i can say that there will be fewer problems in the world if ukraine wins. aid to ukraine is not charity, it is in our interests, because our values ​​and interests are inextricably linked. i do not know what the situation will be in the american budget now, or how actively it will work. british government, but i know that in order to hold the country, we need more, constantly more, such is the sad logic of war, which simply eats up all resources. that is, the war eats up money and so on, but there is also such a story as certain negotiation tracks, dear mr. ambassador, frit, so we understand that one or the other, sometimes behind-the-scenes discussions, sometimes even public stories are going on, the so -called istanbul summit took place at one time with the participation

of the russian side, and we understand what the kremlin is counting on now, which is adamant the will... of collective action may be reduced in terms of financing and providing us with specific financial and military resources, that is , it is not a question of it being completely leveled, and on the other hand, the kremlin hopes that their tactics of destroying our energy system will be able to force ukrainians to look at the war and the prospects for its end in a different way. i realize that this is too broad a field to talk about, but i would ask you now to outline different scenarios that you think are realistic, yes, because there is mr. trump, there is ms. haris, there are a lot of different actors in the world, on whom our victory and the fact that our country is facing

russian aggression depends, well, in any case , putin's plan plus or minus... we have seen this during the last few years: continuous attacks, the use of ground strikes, missile strikes and so on, but i would like you to analyze the different approaches in what is called the perspective of forcing the kremlin to sit down. in the west, there are ongoing debates about support for ukraine, some argues that ... that the war is impossible to win, that russia will eventually achieve its goals, and that peace on russian terms as soon as possible should be insisted upon in order to stop hostilities. former president donald trump, during a debate with kamela garis, said that his goal is not to win ukraine, but only to end hostilities.

presumably, on putin's terms, there are many in the west who share this position. the leaders of leading european countries, as well as the biden administration, continue to strongly support ukraine. now ukrainians sometimes express concern over delays in us decisions on weapons systems and slow deliveries. i understand these complaints and agree with them. however, the biden administration has already done a lot for ukraine, as has germany, for example. although sometimes germany's position seems incomprehensible to me, it has also made significant efforts to support ukraine. poland has also done a lot for ukraine. ukrainians are not alone in their struggle. the discussions at the event are understandable, but they should end with a decision to continue supporting ukraine. during during the pre-election debates, kamala harris strongly and repeatedly supported this idea. she

criticized donald trump, saying he would be willing to accept. in the language of american presidents such as harry truman and ronald reagan, who stood up for freedom and opposed aggressive dictators. many ukrainians would say that these are nice words, but the americans should act faster and more decisively in support. and i agree with that. as i have already mentioned, i hope that the united states and great britain will lift restrictions on ukraine's use of long-range weapons on the territory of russia. ukraine has the right to defend itself, and russia cannot expect its territory to remain safe when it attacks all of ukraine, killing

civilians and terrorizing ukrainian society with bombs and missiles. and attacks on the energy infrastructure, worsening the life of the ukrainian people. russia has no right to any privileged status. i hope that in the near future the united states will remove these restrictions. i was pleased to hear how kamela harris spoke in defense of the freedom of ukraine. this shows that not only joe biden supports ukraine, but also the young generation of american leaders. also understands that ukraine's struggle is our common cause. dear mr. ambassador, frith, one of my most favorite poets, thomaster. eliot once wrote a poem: barren lands, or waste lands, yes, i would not like ukraine to become a waste land, yes, we

understand what we are talking about, because the russians will hit very clearly on our civilian objects , right? this is not news at all, and accordingly, not of any importance political or political military decisions, in addition to the fact that they should be bold, they should be... quite fast, and so there was information that the president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky presented certain elements of his plan, his vision to the american establishment, i do not i know what is included, well, it is probably a state secret, i do not know what is included in zelenskyi's plan, but in any case, we understand that certain things must happen quite quickly, and information about what might happen next year forum, the second forum is dedicated to the form. peace in my opinion, ukrainian diplomacy during the last peace summit in switzerland was at its best. ukraine chose a wise approach,

trying to reach the widest possible consensus on issues that would unite as many countries as possible, especially in the so -called global south. and in my opinion, the ukrainians coped quite well with this task, they managed to achieve progress in gaining or maintaining support. decisions of the peace summit in switzerland, or at least you received some support from such countries, like india and brazil, which did not sign the declaration but attended the summit. so i think it's quite possible that ukraine will make even more progress at the next peace summit. progress can be defined as the unification of a significant number of countries to support the maximum possible number of agreed ukrainian positions. i don't know what an agreement to end the war will look like, it's not for me to talk about, since i'm an american. what conditions will be decided by the ukrainians? i don't know how

this war will end, but it certainly won't end with kiev blowing up russian flag. putin has already missed this moment. we, the collective event, must prepare to strengthen the security of ukraine, so that after the end of this phase of the war, russia... will not be tempted to start aggression again. ukraine should not remain in the gray zone, the danger zone on the other side of the front line outside the borders of nato and the european union. the gray areas are a green light for putin's further aggression. currently, in order to join the european union, ukraine must meet eu requirements. an agreement is required to join nato about how the alliance can help ukraine defend itself. we in the west must realize that stability in europe depends on whether ukraine becomes part of our community. if this does not happen, russia

will choose a convenient moment for its next strike. that is why, in the 90s, nato decided to accept new members from among the former satellite countries of the warsaw pact, which restored their independence. this decision was made because there was an understanding, something. the ira zone is not a zone of stability, an eternal temptation for russian aggression. of course it is will require efforts from the ukrainians themselves. there is no automatic right to eu membership. ukraine must meet his requirements. but i believe that after the war , the ukrainian people will insist on transformations that will be worthy of their huge sacrifices. they will want to build a european ukraine, and i am sure that... they will be able to achieve this. we must help ukraine achieve this goal. its future should be connected with nato and the european union.

and as for the future of russia, it must depend on the choice of the russian of the people thank you, dear ambassador frit, for this difficult, difficult, but honest conversation on the air of the tv channel. i would like to remind our viewers that ambassador daniel frith, ex-coordinator of the united states state department on sanctions policy, was currently working for... glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes. in september, there are discounts on amiksyn ic. you save 10% in plantain pharmacies. fm: galicia. listen to yours. in beresnev, there are

10% discounts on sina baam at podorozhnyk va and oshchad pharmacies. exclusively on the air of our channel. congratulations friends, the politclub program is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week: nato member countries have a huge arsenal. russia is already on the verge of exhausting the resource. topics that resonate in our society. this is the question of trump's victory, what it is. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. what else can the russians do, are they able to use, say, the resources of the lukashenka army allied with them. vitaly portnikov and guests of the project read the entire condemnation. accept my song. i thank you it was difficult, but i was just curious.

but these are absolutely not the same. help understand the present and predict the future, offered the united states to conclude bilateral security agreements with us, a project for those who care and think politclub every sunday at 20:00 on espresso. two hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become akin to many, as well as respected presenters. guests of the studio, events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, espresso in the evening. we are military personnel of a separate unit of the grig named after volodymyr hryga, a unit of unmanned aviation complexes of the 76th separate battalion of the 102nd separate brigade. in the zaporozhye direction , combat clashes occur daily due to constant

enemy assaults. it does not go away. the direction that our battalion has been defending for almost two years. right now we need three times as many modifiers and fire damage from the sky. therefore, we are appealing to everyone who cares to collect funds for 20 duj mavic clasic drones and 10 3t mavics. yes, the amount is not small, but the life of your brothers and sisters and your relatives more expensive we really hope for your support, donation and sharing. let's not let the occupier take a single step further and accelerate the victory together. glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, oleksandr morozov, a well-known publicist, political analyst, who is in prague, will be working on the air of the tv channel. greetings, oleksandr, glad to see and hear. good day, anton. good day to those who watch and listen to us. well, the key story is the so-called

parameters of... what is not there, in particular we are talking about the negotiation process, which is not there, everyone is talking about him, and from time to time splashes of one or another plan reach us, and in general the situation reminds me of a room filled with some kind of cotton wool, yes, but this cotton wool is unfortunately oozing with blood, and blood, in particular ukrainian. we understand that certain processes are being conducted, certain signals and impulses are being transmitted, so that, in principle, it is a cursory indication that these or other negotiations in various... capitals, yes, i don't know, from india and beijing to berlin and brussels, that they are talking about something, so we understand what we have again many questions to our partners and allies regarding the supply of heavy weapons to us and permits for their use on the territory of the aggressor state, that is, the process is certain, how do you see it and what are its main parameters? first, that we have

to be careful. but to treat clickable headlines, because all the time we, as media consumers, react that there is a headline, and someone has declared that he stands for peace, and every time it causes a violent reaction and a feeling that something is happening somewhere, and from they hide it from us, but in reality, when leaders like olaf scholz or any other european leader or diplomat mentions peace, it means... only one thing: everyone who has anything to do with russia's war against ukraine would like peace has come, that's obvious. however, at the same time , diplomacy cannot be built differently. we cannot imagine that someone supports ukraine, militarily supports ukraine, and at the same time did not declare that peace is necessary.