to israel and other allied countries, therefore at the moment pagers and radio stations served as a means of destroying precisely the leaders and activists of these organizations, but an operation to order them was very successfully carried out, that is, an agency was working that was oriented that there would be such a transition of precisely the representatives and it's not the same, it's not just the lebanese, it's hezbollah, it's from other hamas structures, it's their allies on... closer, it can even be representatives of iran, so at the moment it's just such categories that are really fighting against israel, conduct special operations, and precisely the use of such means was also prepared by the israeli special services through various front companies, which produced the same pagers on behalf of taiwanese, for example, companies, and, of course , already handed them over for purchase, as i understand it, to the control agency of precisely this lebanese group. thank you, mr. general, let's go back to the russian terrorists, to

the terrorist activities of putin's army, russia continues to carry out terrorist attacks on the sumy region, the shahed and missile strikes are obviously aimed at destroying the energy objects in the region, whether this can be considered russia's response to the actions of ukrainians on the territory of kurshchyna, or whether the russians are forcing the withdrawal of the armed forces of ukraine in this way. on their territory, or are the russians planning to create some territory in the sumy region, a segment of the territory that would be simply unfit for life? well, first of all , russia usually has a lot of targeted tasks, this is the first situation, this is revenge, many analysts say, but no, they are not taking revenge, i just know the leadership of russia, it is a clearly defined sign for them. they take revenge

for all our successes at the front, they did not expect that we would enter the territory of the kurt region, create a buffer zone, as putin once wanted to create on our territory, because he says how they entered the territory of russia, but simply entered, what putin wanted to create a one-hundred-kilometer buffer zone on the territory of ukraine at the expense of our territories, and russia controlled it, so we passed so that they did not attack sumy oblast, actually with troops, kharkiv oblast, logistical routes in this format and did not place fire equipment there. which would have already massively delivered sumy to sumy oblast, kharkiv oblast, and other territories of our state, so the law is acting here, on the other hand, why are they hitting sumy and kharkiv, this is not only revenge, but it is really carrying out such attacks in the plan to force us somewhere possibly to retreat, possibly to react, especially citizens who will already protest against it. the actions of the authorities regarding the fact that we do not

agree on peace, on a cease-fire, but here russia is already ready, and we already have a plan, but only on the terms of the russian federation, it is controlled, occupied territories, then they are ready for some kind of truce, then prepare new, just aggressive attacks, therefore forcing people by means of terror to express a position against the actions of the authorities regarding the protection of the state and not an agreement on peace, but on the terms of russia, is one of the factors. which they use against sumy, against kharkiv and against all citizens of ukraine, every night, we remember, drones and even missiles of various types fly every night, all the way to lviv, so at the moment the border towns, sumy, are really suffering first of all , for example, kharkiv, others are populated points, but also suffer, of course, all others, citizens who are really exposed to attacks and our people die in all cities of ukraine. these are

large-scale acts of terrorism, if we evaluate in general, putin calculated that the ukrainians would unite and give them a decent feeling of their aggression, so today the question is for him to suppress the spirit of the ukrainians, by means of terror, but it does not succeed, it causes a backlash, therefore, he is still close to forcing us somewhere, perhaps, to go into a state of fear, protests, but he does not succeed, yes will take revenge, will protect... the tour will strike energy facilities in the fall, will simply kill people to liberate, as he says, the territory, but by the method of terror murders, this is the essence of russia today, so there is no wonder here, but how to strike those axis installations that shoot at the same sums, drones, missiles of various types, you , mr. general, you, mr. general, literally took the next question off my tongue. because

it is clear that these rocket launchers and these platforms from which drones are launched from the territory of the russian federation is a legitimate target, a military target for... the armed forces of ukraine, and over the last week we have been waiting for the decision of our western partners regarding permits, strikes with their weapons on the territory of the russian federation, but despite the meeting that took place at the end of last week between biden and colleague from great britain, it is meant with the prime minister of great britain, keir starmer, but there is no such decision, what in your opinion was the reason for such a non-decision? well, first of all what the president of the usa officially declares, he is afraid of a new escalation of the war, and it is initiated not only by some general

threats, but through the intelligence channels between putin and biden, and this is through naryshkin and the director sira beyoncé, there is a constant warning: will you give the blows? on the territory of russia, we will consider that the usa and russia are in a state of war, and of course, then we will strike at american facilities and at the facilities of nato allies, absurd, because russia will not stand, but it is clear that biden reacts, is very careful about granting permission, only sectorally, and believes that we must defend our territory, and gradually displace the enemy at the expense of that aid, but it is very limited, this is a fundamentally strategically incorrect position. er , the enemy can only be seen by those means that he does not expect, these are the latest high-tech means, and on the territory of russia, the occupied territories and on the battlefield, this symbiosis of three components will have prospects of victory for both ukraine and the west, then they will not fight ourselves, nor the members of nato, europe,

nor even the usa, because we will fulfill this one a big, difficult and sacrificial job, but with their support, and therefore the work of persuading our allies in britain. france gives the opportunity and the usa is held, i think in the coming periods, maybe a few weeks, after all, the permission will be given first of all by britain, and practically in parallel with them by the usa, but i will say one more thing, not only these missiles, there are very few of them, there are many of them more is needed for them to play a key role, just like the f-16, not 10, but at least 60, but today the alternative, what we say is to hit these launchers, that everyone strikes... and drones, and shoot missiles, strategic, and s-300, s-400, which will be in kharkov, in sums, very close to the city in a minute and kill people, these are our drones, their hundreds and thousands, which have a ballistic format that can strike up to 200 km, deliver

to morozovsk, to strategic bombers, where they launch iskanders and tu-22s, cruise missiles, and these are both planes and launchers, those centers , respectively, which launch shaheds, this is, for example, on the territory of russia, krasnodar region, the kursk region, where we specifically know where they are, these are specific objects, how should we strike daily with tens or even hundreds of drones so that they raise their heads, imagine if we strike at strategic, so to speak, airfields, where bombers, control systems and missile ammunition warehouses are continuously on the clock. by the airfield 250-300 km, there are cabs, if those who are striking today in the same amount, on kharkov and on our people, and on fighters, most importantly, on a wide front, just as well on drone launchers, and there will be no place for them, because

new strikes will be waiting every second, and they will really hit both these objects and ammunition depots, as literally this night, a very effective, active operation was carried out just in time. on the destruction of various types of missiles against aircraft and cabs, respectively, and against s 300 s 400 missile systems, this is the right approach, but it should be massive, then we will prevent strikes both night and day, mr. general, when putin talks about that there will be consequences after allowing ukraine to attack the territory of the russian federation from afar. western weapons, what does he mean, what are the consequences for the world of the decision by great britain and the united states of america to hit the territory of the russian federation with atakams and storm shadow missiles,

there will be no consequences for these countries and for europe, russia, i i can clearly state that the potential of the whole of russia and its leadership, there is no potential today to fight with... nato countries, so the consequences of such war plans with the baltics, with the poles, who are actually members, will definitely not be there, the only factor in them today , what they are about by... keeps saying, these are nuclear weapons, which they keep saying is a red line, that is, giving permission to strike, and they can use tactical ballistic weapons, i emphasize once again, according to international agreements and through the same channels the same intelligence of birch, naryshkil, according to the pentagon and the ministry of defense of russia between belarus and austin clearly defined priorities: you will deploy tactical nuclear weapons. or even more strategic, we will precisely target your objects, and they are constantly populated in the online system, all

russian facilities, it will be a powerful counterattack, there will be no prospects here, so russia will continue to threaten, creating these red lines, so that we do not disagree with our american and british colleagues, but they are simply not ready and will not be able to apply it, therefore that this is the end for the russians, americans and everyone who lives on earth, modeling the situation. of nuclear war, which i conducted several times in washington, i watched movies practically online, destroys humanity, so putin knows it, sinzipin also watched this movie, so clearly focuses on what will happen in the future, and putin and his entourage are not suicidal, someone says, but no, he is ready there, no, he is afraid to let anyone in even at a distance, we remember, even because of covid, and now he has a three-tiered security guard from various so that they don't collude, that's why it will be ee... demolish what they give permission, we will strike, but a very small number of these rockets, atakams,

stromsheds and sculpts, today the alternative, i emphasize again, we emphasize very much only for foreign aid and dachas permission, our drones are hundreds of times more, if we say 350, 500 already, drones that can cover all these launchers, airfields, warehouses, logistics centers. it will be 100 times better and further up to 200 km than atakamsya. thank you. thank you, mr. general, it was mykola molomush, the former head of the foreign intelligence service of ukraine. friends, we continue to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those currently watching us live on youtube and facebook, please vote in our poll. today we ask you the following: do you expect biden's approval of the victory plan with... literally next week , zelenskyi is flying to the united states of america, the

un general assembly will be held there, and within the framework of this general assembly , zelenskyi expects to meet with the president of the united states of america, so on it's pretty simple on youtube, it's either yes or no, and if you're watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and also vote on 0800 211 381 if you're optimistic and hoping for the biden plan to be approved victory is green. no. 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free. vote at the end of the program, we will tally up the results of this vote. next, we will be in touch with oleg hrybachuk, head of the center for joint actions, ex-vice prime minister for european integration and former head of yushchenko's presidential office. mr. oleg, i congratulate you. thank you for being with us today. good evening. thank you for the invitation. well, let's start with the plan of victory. which no one has seen yet, but which has been announced for a long time by

president zelenskyi's team and for himself president zelensky, he said that literally today, our victory plan is completely ready, all points and details have been determined, now it is important to implement it with determination. yesterday, in an evening video message, zelensky announced a strong military content of the victory plan. let's listen to what the supreme commander-in-chief of the armed forces said. of ukraine. the first meeting regarding the military content of our victory plan for ukraine. worked together with the military command, prepared a good, strong content for a military package of exactly what can significantly strengthen ukraine according to the victory plan. mr. oleg, you are an expert and an experienced person, a person who knows very well american politics and... their politicians, were you involved in the creation of this victory plan, do you know about its content, and what

exactly this victory plan should contain , since this is a plan for the victory not only of zelensky, but of the entire ukrainian state, well, not me, i think that there is no one there from civil society, i have strong doubts that they were involved, not only that, i can say that they were not all the political forces in ukraine, i have heard the speeches of people's deputies, can say that they were involved, respectively, even from the party, i think, well, maybe maryana, but you see, she was transferred to other committees, she will already be, she now will be in foreign affairs. by the way, so what are you waiting for, yes, yes, then she will probably strengthen the implementation of this plan, well , but to be serious, well, yes, i have had conversations and will continue, i am leaving there tomorrow for certain meetings, conferences, which will include american participants

international participants karl bilt and this is his traditional club, and of course it will be discussed there and i... there were meetings in kyiv with those americans, some of whom were at the yalta conference, then we simply exchanged opinions, but it is not about involvement, this is about feelings, and the americans were interested in whether anyone in ukraine saw this plan, what we can say about it, my answer was that in reality we do not see this plan and cannot see it, we just imagine that there are certain components of this plan, you see, you said today, that the president already... said, he is completely ready, there was still 90% there yesterday, then from various foreign sources, as is traditional in ukraine, we will learn some features of this plan, the american side confirmed that it had already seen it, in a word , we see a lot of information there , such a background that prepares public opinion for the fact that now in washington this

will happen, the main main expectations, or the main... risks or i don't know this plan in that its success actually depends exclusively on support or not support president biden, and something tells me that we will hear from the administration of president biden, it seems that when trump was asked by the moderators at his debate with harris, if he supports the victory of ukraine, he said that he supports peace in ukraine. and something tells me that it is possible that when there is a direct question whether president biden fully supported zelenskyi's plan there, he will talk about the fact that he has always supported and will support ukraine, that's how i feel, i have such feelings about that , so that you remember the americans who have already confirmed that they have seen the peace plan or zelensky's victory plan, the permanent

representative of the united states of america to the united nations, linda thomas greenfield. says that this plan of the president is already on the table somewhere in washington, let's hear what she said. we have seen president zelensky's peace plan, we believe that it contains a strategy and a vision that can be implemented, and we need to see how we can contribute to this by communicating with all the heads of state who will be here in new york. so, again, we hopefully making some progress, that's what we're doing here. you, mr. olezh, also mentioned various international publications that write about the fact that in this plan of victory, lemon wrote today that zelensky

hopes to receive from joseph biden an invitation for ukraine to join nato, before that. .. the president of the united states of america, biden, will leave the white house, this is part of the victory plan that he will present in washington. could, could it be part of this grand plan of victory, given the the fact that this is quite a difficult decision, and biden, if he will voice it or somehow articulate it, then exclusively, obviously, in order to play some role in the election campaign of vice president kamala harris or not? but there are risks here, because it is the involvement of the united states in the third world war, this is the card that trump and his vice president are increasingly using, they are talking about it directly, and and and trump's last interview that he, he does not sure that china or

russia are enemies, he does not see them as enemies, and obviously he will try not to ... annoy, just like the biden administration, they still hope that with russia there will be an opportunity to return to business as usual, some kind of reboot, this is a certain tradition in every american administration, but here the situation is even more complicated because biden's desire for ukraine to receive this invitation is not enough, we remember that bush in the last months there with... his president, president bush, he sincerely wanted, i spoke with his team, he it's just that the team was like that, and the advisor from his national security and his team tried so hard to slow him down, but he really wanted... ukraine to receive an action plan regarding the membership of ukraine and georgia, and he visited both georgia and ukraine, and he met opposition, in particular from chancellor merkel. biden has scholz,

who does not differ in active support, therefore, even if somewhere politically it would sound like the desire of president biden, then we cannot count on the fact that we will receive a formal invitation on behalf of the entire nato of ukraine, so this.. .it's more, it's more talk about, again, we'll be with you as long as it takes. mr. olezh, this whole story with the preparation of zelenskyi's victory plan coincided with the discussion by the leaders of the united states of america, great britain about giving ukraine the right to strike with their weapons, western weapons on the territory of the russian federation, and the president. from the united states of america met with the prime minister of great britain last friday the 13th and they also tried to discuss it somehow, i understand, but judging by the

according to information coming from the white house, there is no such solution. why is there no such solution? well, we can go back to scholz, who literally two days ago said again that the communards will never, never be slaves, scholz will never be german. no , there is no answer there, there is simply a firm one who will provide us with intimidation, let me ask what the hell, the political position, accordingly, this conversation about granting permission to use missiles, firstly, in terms of military experts say that the radius of a large effect is 1000 km, and up to 1000 km, these are not even rockets of a long range, of course, if we have 80, 100 there now, for us it is already 300 km... meters, it seems a long range, but this is a technical issue, and a political issue, most likely a decision will be made to grant permission to use missiles this range

of up to 1000 km, not american production, and we heard about it that it is great britain, italy, maybe, but again before the change of the presidential administration in washington, i do not expect from ... and his sullivans such a principled decision, this one must understand that this will be a challenge for the next president of the united states. well, but now, mr. olezh, the challenge for the whole world is the provision of ballistic missiles by the iranian side to russia for strikes on the territory of the ukrainian state. last week, london, washington, and... france , including paris, made decisions on sanctions, another set of sanctions against iran, but to me, to be honest, it is incomprehensible why ukraine

took place only by the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine, and we diplomatic relations are still maintained with iran, you don't know, that's how iran was baptized or what they are doing there and swore that he did not give any rockets. through the mouth of its foreign minister, that's all, you're lying, iran, which is known for being easy, told us, we remember the situation with the downed plane, that he's very simply telling lies, but so far it's like a situation of genocide in ukraine, when an international institute was held here and they said that there is not enough evidence that this is actually genocide, or maybe they just kill you somehow without... without genocidal intentions, the same is true here, the world now still lacks evidence that such missiles were set in russia, but when

the facts will happen, when the debris will be found there, analyzed, some time will pass, but then we will think, this is a very strange position, because it should have been the case that the world acted based on prejudice, well, let's not we have to wait until something terrible happens again in ukraine. an information wave will pass, and then in response to another level of unprecedented crimes, we will be given the opportunity to take some countermeasures, but this is all a reactive position, and putin feels this weakness very well, when there are doubts, the red lines that you talked about there with your husband, that the intelligence agencies are communicating there, but they are drawing... something, some other threats, that this time is no longer acceptable, that if now, we will

definitely be there for you then i'm sorry all over your american european capitals with nuclear weapons, well, we can react to it in different ways, but people like biden, scholz and some other european politicians are actually affected by it, and since the whole political struggle is huge, especially growing there oppositional sentiments between germany, france has a difficult situation, russia uses it very skillfully, that's what russia knows how to do, it knows how to play. weaknesses of the western world, they have studied the psychology of the western world quite well, and the western world, through the eyes of the same biden or scholz, still has not understood putin and does not know how one should really behave, but the british are drastically different here, the countries that were neighbors are different of the soviet union in the baltics or scandinavia, but in fact, what is biden, what is

salt in this regard. it's just very easy to predict and putin plays quite elementary on their phobias. another dictator and self-proclaimed president of belarus , lukashenko, speaking on the day of national unity in belarus, warned the west against attacking belarus, because he says that there will be a third world war. let's hear what he said. western special services talk about belarus as a possible city. these are escalations, i just want to warn our adversaries, our rivals, and those who do not understand yet, not to do this, it will not benefit not only the region of europe, but also the entire planet, an attack on belarus, remember, this is the third world war in short, mr. oleg, what do you think about the role, the current role?

it is clear that he now leans more towards beijing, and that is why he can talk about the third world war here and that his roof is actually much wider than we imagine, that is, not only putin's roof, well, he already has now missiles with nuclear warheads, and he can deliver a tactical strike with them, lukashenko reminds himself from time to time, but please note that even our special services do not perceive these maneuvers of his at all. when they are pulling something under the border there, threatening, threatening with counterattacks, it’s just that he, well, he already has this roach, no one really takes him seriously, but he is obviously afraid that he can simply be removed imperceptibly, and that is why he is there, maneuvers, common training with china is doing, looking for some of its own usefulness, but the level of threat to us from lukashenka

has dropped significantly, because... he understands, as our military said, well, before we get to minsk , we will pass through the forest in a few days, and he understands that support is in belarusian society will be much greater than the support of the russians in kursk oblast, that's why he says so, but the threat from him is less and less. thank you, mr. olezh, for the conversation, it was oleg hrybachuk, former deputy prime minister of ukraine and former head of yushchenko's presidential office. friends, we... we continue to work live on the espresso tv channel, we will look at the results of our poll, these are the interim results of the television poll, we ask you this, do you expect biden to approve zelensky's victory plan 37%, yes, 63%, no. next we have bbc news, a 15 -minute segment, and after this segment we will return to the studio, we will have political experts vitaly kulyk and serhiy taran. stay with us, it will be interesting.

thousands injured, more than ten killed in explosions of pagers and other devices in lebanon and syria, most of the victims are hezbollah groups, they blame israel for the explosions, tel aviv does not comment on this. so what is known as of now and how did it happen that thousands of pagers went off at the same time? the next 15 minutes of the broadcast will be about this bbc in the studio in london jafer umerov. where did it all start? pagers started going off in lebanon and syria on tuesday afternoon. witnesses saw how with...