the only way to get out of the crisis, nothing like that, everything did not go as radislav sekorsky said, but as we said, it went, so that such people are also wrong, they do not really understand our internal intricacies, despite the fact that that i respect both him and his wife very much, that is, i have known them for many years, so don't make him an enemy, this is the first part, the second, since it has already become a discussion of the essence of the issue, yes there... the referendum and everything else, then this is the answer given by the ministry of foreign affairs, well, let's put it this way, russia is also there in its own way, well, this question does not fly to anyone in a way with no referendums there, you and i know that this, in principle, this is more likely to play along with the russian position than the ukrainian return of crimea, so there is no need, i think, to inflate it, why it turned out like that, i will tell you, what it was at first.

the rain has gone that the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyy, behaves harshly with the poles, it appears in the polish press, and then suddenly it appears, and the representative of poland also acts like this at our meetings, that's all, i think, as it arose, it is emotional informational duel, it will end, there will be no further continuation, but if suddenly we hear such a position again officially, from anyone, from the polish government, if it is confirmed that they are calling for such a line, then yes, i would answer correctly, diplomatically, but not even everything is in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs, there can be even clearer accents, this is an unacceptable position, it does not lead to anything good, because it is now only grist to the mill of the russians in this situation , well yes, which say that in fact...

crimea remained russian, this is also their position regarding sikorsky's statement. they also reflected and said that there is no need for us to hold any more referendums there, that's why we have such a reaction for now. another important decision that awaits ukraine is the decision on its permission for our western partners to strike with long-range weapons on the territory of the russian federation last week. the president of the united states of america , joseph biden, met with the prime minister of great britain, keir starmer, and before therefore, the secretary of state of the united states of america and the minister of foreign affairs of great britain visited ukraine, they participated in the forum, in several forums that took place in ukraine, so there was an expectation of what would happen after the meeting. the president

of the united states of america and the prime minister of great britain, nevertheless, the position of these two countries will somehow be articulated, regarding the decision, or regarding the decision only by stormshedov, that these missiles can fly over the territory of the russian federation, and even the guardian wrote about that , which great britain has almost already adopted such a solution, or everything, everything is clear in this story, whether this solution is possible. maybe, but it can be publicly articulated already after these missiles fly over the territory of the russian federation. well, i would like to emphasize, excuse me, that we are talking about long-range missiles. in fact, these are short-range missiles. we had such missiles, maybe a little less distance. we

simply already used them, such rockets, well, i have them, period, the same rockets that were still produced there in small quantities to a large-scale invasion, that is, these are not new, not new missiles for ukraine, we have the right to use them, moreover, i think that we very much hope that in the near future we will see a wider ... application of ukrainian production of missiles of such a range , that is, a range of 300, 500 and up to 1000 km, this is a short range, i think that we have lost information, i read all even our rocket journalists, well, the range is correct, it’s like a comparison yes with what we have today, but it no short-range missiles, long-range missiles, i would consider it long -range missiles, yes there. above 5,500 km, the average

range of the missile is 1, 5, 5, in this interval, that is, what we are talking about with our partners, about the missiles that we have, we just don't have enough of them... enough, we are talking with partners, completely incorrectly formulated the informational submission, we constantly emphasized, when i say we, of course, i did not emphasize this, but i say, we, ukrainians, presidents, others, emphasized, give us further missiles to hit, and not more missiles, but give us accurate, humane, weapons, missiles are humane weapons, because they, as it were, are a sidekick in this, in my opinion, yes, in this sidekick, put them in, they definitely hit, well, drones said there, well, i think, something seems to me that there was a missile there, so they definitely hit there, this is only my conclusion, i do not pretend that

it was some kind of position, so that they do not say that i read it somewhere, no, i just saw the video, i saw an explosion similar to that from rockets, so 500 are already being used there, how many 30. that is, we have our own, so nothing new, just the number is less, and the russians use iskanders, they hit odesa, they kill people, ours beat humanely, exactly in warehouses, they do not kill residents, and what do we do next, and what do we ask , that we should beg, from whom, that is, we should not beg, but simply rush and throw everything into the production of these types of missiles, and then no one would... well, it has already been done, well, time has passed, and now, what is there, you know, the difference is which rocket will fly there to russia, one or the other, just the quantity is needed, and now, the quantity is escalation, no, because the russians got iranian ballistic missiles, the russians got korean ballistic missiles, what are we

talking about, that is, this is, i think this is the moment where we can talk tough in private, because tough why, because when was realistically the moment that some arguments worked there, i can’t understand, but now what arguments, no arguments, and what red lines, he kursk, the kursk region entered the territory of russia, what arguments can you still have, there are no arguments, only in public it is not necessary there it is all strong to blow things up, to blow things up there, and not just publicly show the situation, i think that it will be solved in reality, well, because there are no real... arguments that the americans had before and our partners, they are not there now, all those that were, closed, due to the unreasonable actions of russia, the increase of escalation on their part, now why i say that i emphasize once again, this is a humane, this is a high-precision

sniper missile weapon, ukraine should be armed with exactly these types of weapons, so that there is no contact battle with a kalashnikov or there even a javelin ... namely contactless combat on distances with uavs, with such missiles, with the same hymers, that is, this is something that can somehow , at least a little, establish a balance with the russians, and in principle, well, i know, we have been talking about it for a long time, of course, i will not reveal the secret here , that it's not what i invented there, our negotiators don't talk there, they talk, but for some reason i still think that in this... issue, we could act creatively, well, more creatively, to get around this such an inflexible political position, well, even now, i think it will be difficult to see it until the election day, but for me

it seems that even before the election day in the usa in november, well, i think that from the first days of november, there after the fifth, we just saw the use of this type of... partner missiles, now the question is how many, right here and not only quality, there is a range, but the quantity, and by the way, germany, taurus, well, what arguments will chancellor scholz have next to keep these missiles, that is, it seems to me that this is all a political decision, it is overripe, but in fact we will find out somewhere in november , the european parliament turned to the application ukraine's western partners and... called on the immediate lifting of restrictions on ukraine's strikes by western weapons against the russian federation. the speaker of the state duma of the russian federation , vyacheslav volodin, criticized this appeal of the european parliament and once again threatened the west with nuclear weapons. let's listen to what volodya said.

just think about what they are discussing. they discuss the task of striking our civilians. cities, moreover, they are discussing, believing that it will not affect them, it is not so, we will answer, and we have something to answer, mr. valery, they for so long they have been announcing their powerful, more powerful weapons, but judging by what cia director burns said about how he talked to naryshkin in 22, at the end of 22, and warned the russians about the consequences of using nuclear weapons against ukraine, because there was such a threat. said burns, do they clearly understand in the kremlin what

, what will be the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons, whether tactical or strategic, of any kind, and how will this end for the current regime in russia? they understand everything perfectly, do not listen to what is there volodin is speaking from the rostrum of the state duma, these are internal messages for them, the king is. there are nobles, and there are serfs, and serfs have to live in this sense, there are so many lies fed to the serfs that it is hard to believe, russia will not use any strategic missiles, this is obvious for two reasons, firstly, the potential of russia incomparable to the potential of the usa, together with britain there or, well , if it were comparable, everyone says, it will all be destroyed, there, in fact, russia knows that they... they fly like that, not that every now and then, the missile itself, but what about the charges, they

they don't know me at all, although, you know, these bots attack me when i comment that russia has not conducted nuclear tests, but i state once again that, unlike the usa, which found a way to test without an actual explosion of a large-scale nuclear warhead, russia is so technologically no, and that is why there are no normal tests of nuclear weapons in russia, without a normal... no country should use nuclear weapons, except at such a moment when hundreds of warheads are flying at you there, only at this moment, already desperate, in another the situation will not be applied, this is the first, second, why would they use nuclear weapons if they blew up the tile, that is, it flooded man-made with huge consequences, well, in operational terms, it is also an operation, then they have the zaporizhzhia station under control, which... constantly under threat, we don't know this, but the specialists there constantly know, the situation

sometimes looms, then decreases, and when they hit our transformers at nuclear power plants, which then endanger the normal operation of nuclear power plants, in crimea, if event the crimean titan or whatever it is called there now is also a dangerous object, we had a russian invasion in 1700. 17 such dangerous objects on our territory, yes, why should they, they first of all think about how to use it in reality, and not nuclear weapons, which they constantly threaten there, that is, nuclear weapons are for china they have balance, it's for another, but it's definitely not for this war, and the second thing is that they know that if only they do it, at least one tactical charge will be used there. everything, them, them they are finished, they are finished, putin knows it, that is, they do not have such comparable forces to

withstand such a confrontation, they were warned, so i believe that the threat is nuclear, it is in the course of the war, as we see it now, it not that it doesn't exist, it exists, but the way it's being hyped up, out of fear, you know, actually the paradox is that the russians have died now, i would say... ten times more than the russians, just , only the military, only those who set foot on our land ten times more than would die from several tactical nuclear warheads, you understand that they simply do not explain to their people, people do not know on what scale they are being killed there, so we need to give more information, not to follow their line, partners to explain the situation, i would turned attention is now more on facilities such as the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which are captured by the russians, this is a real threat. well, by the way,

president zelenskyi today welcomed the resolution of the magathe, which confirms the need for ukraine to restore full control over the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant power plant and withdrawal of russian troops and personnel from this plant. he reminded that nuclear safety is the first clause of the peace formula, quoting president zelensky. i am pleased to see that today's resolution of the magathe general conference contributes to these important efforts, which only through collective determination and principled action will we be able to compel. stop blackmail and terror - wrote zelensky on the social network x. mr. valery, does the resolution oblige the magathe to react to russia and can the magathe apply to russia and rosatom, in particular any sanctions, because we know that russia is building a lot

of nuclear power plants all over the world, and no one has yet imposed any sanctions on rosatom. does not apply, if i am not mistaken , personal sanctions to rosatom, there are one or two cases, but you are right that rosa somehow feels very comfortable in this situation, and the reasons for not applying sanctions against rosatom are not magate, let's be fair, here are the decisions of many countries, including european countries, and the usa, by the way, as well, and this surprises me, because sanctions for rosat they should have... for a long time, now with regard to the magats, they are already adopting the second such resolution at the un, they also mentioned these issues, the magat is a structure of oonivsk, but the most interesting thing is that mr. grossi always says exactly that, it is not a matter for the magats to talk about there about to leave the station, here it turns out that at the level of the general conference, that is, this

is all announced when 150 un members gather, well, 178 are included in the magat, well, 150. now , it seems, there is a general conference in vienna at the 68th, so everything is fine , magat can do the following statements, and it is our task for ukraine to make as many such statements, resolutions, and fixing documents as possible for two purposes, firstly, it is a constant process of pressure on the release of the zaporizhia nuclear power plant, because it is in danger due to the occupation now in first of all, but also the people who work there. there, the russians were not able to start their own, to replace the ukrainians, and there people keep it all professionals, just so that it does not explode, that is, everything is held and for how long it has been the third year, that is why it is all very difficult, that is the question, and the second question is the responsibility for these crimes afterwards, it is still necessary to consider the convention on nuclear terrorism, that is, it

still has not been reached, why has it not been reached, here i will tell you a very good example, the resolution, the president stated, i see, he stated, everyone made statements, in fact, in fact, this is just an example when the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine works correctly, er, we must give credit to mr. tsimbalyuk, when he was in vienna, he was engaged in this as a representative, and now, when it came to us an absolutely unjustified pause with the appointment before in vienna, he started doing it from kyiv, and when, i think so, the minister is new, it is also you. he paid attention to these issues and work began, they worked there for a week, a week in difficult conditions, i will remind you that there are still elections for another body of the magat, in addition to the general conference, there is also a board of governors, 11 new countries were elected, as far as i know , met with these countries, that is, normal

diplomatic work went on, so i have a big question, if we can do it here, so can the ministry of foreign affairs, why do we have it? delegation in the board of governors of the magat, which is not copes with his tasks, as we see what can be achieved, why then, well, why this, let them decide in the office, the minister of energy is in charge, they go there a couple of times to vienna, the point of this, well, you know, not that , well, the minister of energy has a task here in ukraine, we have a winter that we don’t know how to get through, and the minister of energy is visiting vienna here, i would first change, well, at least japarov, he is not there today, he no longer works, replaced him with tsymbalyuk in the delegation of the board of governors, and i would still consider the second in favor based on the results of the work, i would consider replacing the head of the delegation. this is a task that will increase efficiency, here is a concrete example of how it worked well in this particular case, but the russians work constantly, with money, the russian representative

meets, has dinner, but, well, i don’t know, he has dinner there every week, ours can have dinner ? only the ambassador can speak, and there is no ambassador in our country, so these are simple questions, they add efficiency and should be resolved, i think that this issue is overdue, to manage in the city the manager has a diplomat, this is the first thing, and now at least give the representative of the ministry of foreign affairs an authorized assistant, more resources, work opportunities, he showed tsymbalyuk that he can do it... mr. valery, the very end of our big conversation, i would like to show you and to tv viewers, a fragment from an interview with the ukrainian newspaper. of the eu ambassador to ukraine kateryna maternova, who says that it is a realistic forecast that ukraine can join the european union by the end

of this decade. let's hear what she said. i already said in an interview earlier, and i repeat, i believe that the goal set by president michel, the accession of ukraine to the eu by the end of this decade, is realistic. yes. i believe that this is real, but the accession to the eu, and this must be realized, is not only a technical process of membership negotiations, which of course also takes time, but it is also a political ratification in all member countries, because the accession of a new member means changing the eu treaty, therefore it must be ratified in the format required by each of the eu countries, and this always takes away some time, so during the 2004 expansion it took about a year and a half. well, that is, mr. valery, there are six years ahead, if, if we proceed from this deadline, which is until the end of this

decade, six years are for us to go through all the procedures for joining the european union, or whether we will go through it so quickly, taking into account the claims of some of our neighbors on various issues, first, without joining nato, or in some way'. protection and this umbrella from russia , there is no further prospect, none the eu will not help this situation, the eu is not involved in this, there are no effective levers in the field of security, so i look at it calmly, on the contrary, i think that the prime minister's statement that we should enter was, but if it is meant , so that ukraine unilaterally accepts all political demands, starting from historical memory, starting from there... to give up their heroes, this, or there, as the hungarians demand something new every time, well, this, you know, this is such blackmail, which we

should not allow to use the negotiations with the eu on sections of joining the european union as a political tool for our neighbors, i would say so, because mainly they are neighbors, i.e. poland, hungary, i.e. slovakia, we will see all this, and new liras will come there. leaders, politicians, there will be elections and they will keep us constantly, you know the bait, what do you want in the eu, so let's give it to us, you need it, so now i would put the emphasis on nato, on security, on our partners poes said, listen, eu integration is a two-way street, and let's go, ukraine is in a hurry, taking its time, quietly working on negotiating position. we have made political decisions, ukraine will be in the eu, there is a candidate, we will calmly work on the working bureaucratic agenda, and nato is

an issue that needs to be resolved this year or next year, that is the key issue here. thank you, mr. valery, for the conversation, it was valery chaly, diplomat, plenipotentiary and extraordinary ambassador of ukraine. friends, we continue to work live on the espresso tv channel. i remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct polls and questions. you about this, do you perceive the kremlin's nuclear threats to ukraine are serious, forgive me and ukraine? so, everything is quite simple on youtube, yes, no, and there is also a function to leave your comment, regarding this, this is the first, well, let's look at the results of the interim survey, television 33% yes, 67% no. in september there are discounts on amiksin ic. 10% in pharmacies plantain bam and savings. in september, there are

discounts on nephrobam. 10% in podorozhnyk bam and oskad pharmacies. in september, there are discounts on relief, 10% in pharmacies, plantain pam and oskad. in september, there are discounts on sudocrem. 15% at podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. an unusual look at news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresen had done so, he would have gone to prison. a special view on the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, and beyond its borders, who is china then, my heart hurts. in september saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. one hundred thousand square meters of damaged property. apartments, houses that are

needed. to rebuild, about the situation with recovery in different regions of ukraine, about rights, opportunities and personal experiences of people. this is what olga's house looked like last year, and this is what it looks like now. i am not spending money at the moment. however, how to unite the country in the process of recovery in the project of the urban reconstruction and development program. every saturday at 18:30 at espresso. every week, the saturday political club helps to understand the processes taking place in ukraine and the world. vitaly portnikov, khrystyna yatskiv, andriy smoliy and invited experts based on facts give their assessment and forecast of the development of events. do you want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, see the saturday politics club every saturday on espresso. we are servicemen

of the griga separate unit, named after volodymyr griga, of the unmanned aviation complexes of the 76th separate battalion of the 102nd separate brigade. in the zaporozhye direction , combat clashes take place daily due to the constant assaults of the enemy. this is not a vyminaypil direction, which our battalion has been defending for almost two years. right now we need three times as many modifiers and fire damage from the sky. therefore, we appeal to all who are interested in collecting funds for 20 dji mavic classic drones and 10 3t mavics. yes, the amount is not small, but the life of your siblings and relatives is much more expensive. we really hope for your support, donation and sharing. let's not let the occupier take a step further together, and let's speed up the victory together. glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes.

greetings, friends, live on the espresso tv channel, the second part of the verdict program, my name is serhiy rudenko, today is the traditional friday journalist club on espresso, and today we will talk about the following: 100% ready. your plan to win volodymyr zelenskyi will present to us president joe biden next week what surprises may await ukrainians when the content of zelenskyi's plan is also announced to them. a new stage of decolonization. hundreds of settlements received new names without imperial narratives, but there are exceptions. how the parliament became the weakest link in the toponymy process.

cleaning of ukraine. servants flee abroad. people's deputy andrii odarchenko, accused of trying to bribe the leadership of the reconstruction agency, is wanted. why the border remains transparent for deputies runaways we will talk about this and more for the next 45 minutes. i remind you that we work live on the tv channel, as well as on ... platforms in youtube and facebook, for those who are currently watching us live on these platforms, please subscribe to our pages, be sure to like this video in order for it to be promoted in youtube and facebook trends, and take part in our survey, today we ask you the following: do you take the kremlin's nuclear threats seriously? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, and the answers are clear if you get the answers right.