it's too late now, how can i propose something, it will be too late, so i think that if this was a serious plan for victory, its preparation and discussion would be completely different, because if they contained elements that require decisions by the parliament, relevant decisions by the government , well, then there would be all these meetings, and this is more like the formalization of certain public initiatives that we will hear about. very soon all this will be announced in public, just as a rule, why so? well, we see that the president of ukraine loves volodymyr zelenskyi namely, unlike his predecessors, he likes to be the first to give exclusives to foreign media, so for some reason he is more comfortable, i don't know why he is so comfortable, and foreigners, by the way, there are nuances, because with foreigners, certain interview conditions are also agreed upon, which ukrainian journalists are not always. accept,

because they are also part of this, this process here in ukraine, we have our own rules, so, that 's why it's only because of using the un platform, the meeting in washington for the first such message, you remember, for example , the formula of peace, it was also voiced, well, in this form in the twenties, not in ukraine, yes, well, that is, in the grand scheme of things, there is nothing catastrophic here, it is more important that all this... was carried out, that these things came to fruition, and not so that later , when they rushed to find money for the second half of the year for the army, and there is none, because for some reason everyone was waiting for peace already this summer, such things should not be in the plans, well, and the last thing, i have already talked about it, i do not want to repeat myself, but i'll say it briefly, if you don't have a strategy, and we don't have a vision, one is asymmetric strategy, strategy of balances with...

balancing with russia is there, waiting for changes in russia, different strategies, if you don't know what the main strategy is now, then you can't write realistic plans, it is claimed, and you can't write scenarios, so strategy must be adopted, well, the correction must be made in today’s conditions , taking into account the forces, resources, means, external factors, the presence of the same ukrainian missiles, their... number, what we receive from partners, the availability of european funding in the conditions difficulties in the usa, all this, i am concerned that there is a mood among many that somehow putin will agree to end the war, i do not understand where these arguments came from, i have no signal yet that russia, at least in winter will leave us alone, no, it won't, and it will continue, unfortunately. you have already mentioned,

mr. valery, the situation with these 6 billion dollars of remaining funds for military support of ukraine. pentagon spokeswoman sabrina singh said that the united states department of defense is working with congress to secure an extension of the president's authority to allocate $6 billion beyond the end of the fiscal year to... let's hear what she said. we are committed to using every dollar and every cent within this mandate. but the problem is also that we cannot provide aid packages without having the necessary weapons in our warehouses. this is something we are also working on, and i will remind you that for six months, until we had additional funding, we could not replenish our warehouses. that's why we need congress to

expand this authority so we can continue to provide arms packages. mr. valeriu, given that the united states of america has entered the presidential campaign, and it is clear that now each of the candidates will play the way that is more convenient for him and the way that is more profitable for him in the current situation, can we expect that the congress will expand these powers about what? says sabrina singh about using that remaining $6 billion. ms. singh was responding to the question of ostap yarysh, a journalist of the voice of america, in washington, who asked a very direct and precise question, even with a proposal, how to solve it without kenrsu at all, that is , the answer was, she did not answer me... i was not convinced at all, well, i will start with the fact

that zabrinakh does not know these nuances due to the nature of her activity, she is still engaged in a different profession, so as and... they wrote the thesis, she said: in fact, the truth is that despite all the nuances with the presence of weapons, the approach was such that 6 billion were not used until 1 october, the congress is useless here, it could all be done by the executive branch, moreover, now you can inform the congress and move it all there further, but it is not about the difficulties, they are there, they are always there, and the work of the congress with ... the executive power with the white house, the state department always continues, they always discuss the nuances, but they will not convince me that these 6 billion could not be used before october 1, it was possible and necessary, why is this happening, the usa is dragging, well, the first

during the company did not really want to emphasize, then they are pulling, they don't want them to run out of resources, yes, to support ukraine, by the way, yes, but look, i said that... for a year there are only all these leftovers, that is, we have no new solutions, and in these conditions, i will remind you that a year passed, as it passed, they pulled out on these balances at the end, even there the accounting department counted, serious people, auditors, accountants sat down and counted a few billion more, that is, i think that their strategy is wrong now, it can was basic, correct at first, now it is wrong, they understand that... anything is possible be, there may be other directions, money will have to be spent, weapons will have to be had, they are pulling so that if they wear out putin and on him, they will still show him every time that there are still resources, but resources are now the key the word that is being discussed is,

in fact, still next year, somehow everyone understands, but what to do in the 26th year, no one understands, and putin does not understand what he is doing in the 26th year, that is the paradox, what can . just at the stage when ukraine will get chances, just give up, give up ukraine, to be honest in this situation, therefore, well, i think it is good that journalists ask direct questions, but i would very much like that these direct questions to partners were not asked by the president, did not impersonate, regardless of his surname, the president of ukraine, no you have to introduce yourself, there are other ways of working, these tasks are such... difficult and not very pleasant issues are decided by the national security adviser, the advisers, well, in our case it is the foreign policy adviser, that is, i don't know why all this and what in the first part, you and i talked, everyone applause here or there attention, and that's all

this current, such a complicated mechanism of work, everything depends only on the first person, it should be rolled out and told to our partners, i have... a very simple solution, well listen, don't feed us with with these stories about your complex mechanism, i will tell you how complicated it all is for us, so what, we chose a solution, said that the package was allocated, yes, by the way, and ukraine also took part in this, its friends involved, and the congress participated, which has the right to leave now a person and talk, but we didn’t use this money, yes, but the congress, everyone, is this your joint decision, this... i want to ask, that is, now i think that the congress should press and here without surnames, why so it happened, why there, where in that decision, where was the victory plan, the allocation of funds, why there was no corresponding, even public report, why these funds are used in this way, why

ukraine was not given concentrated weapons this year, logistics are difficult, not always there are weapons in warehouses, i understand that, but everything is fine, i know the partners our usa is doing its best. i have those when they are commissioned, when they are commissioned, they are the us military, the us national guard, they will pull it all, i know, these are people who are doing a great job, but they need political decisions, money and political guidance, and then the pentagon, intelligence and the state government will do everything, and the americans in this regard, they are very efficient and professional, so these are purely political decisions related to strategy. the united states, no more, no less, i claim it and i can provide arguments. thank you, mr. valery, i will remind our viewers that throughout our broadcast, we conduct a survey, we ask you about whether you take the kremlin's nuclear threats seriously, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes

or no, write your own thoughts and comments under the video on youtube, if you watch us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on the numbers, do you take the kremlin's nuclear threats seriously 0800 211 381 or 0800 211382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote on... at the end of the program we will match the results of this voting, mr. valery, yesterday the polish foreign minister radyslaw sikorski made a statement about crimea, and our closest neighbor says that crimea is symbolic, important for russia and for putin, and strategically important for ukraine. so he does not see how the two countries can come to an agreement without demilitarizing

the peninsula, and he proposes to put crimea under a un mandate for 20 years, which sikorsky says: we could put crimea under a un mandate to prepare an honest referendum after checking who is legitimate residents and so on, and we could put it off for 20 years. in response, the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine declared inadmissibility. compromises regarding the status of crimea and the territorial integrity of ukraine. crimea is the center of gravity of the european security architecture, its full restoration is possible only after the complete de-occupation of the entire territory of ukraine, including the ukrainian peninsula. how do you assess, mr. valery, sikorsky's statement, considering that the un is not a powerful organization now, whose mandate will be which mandate will the same russia consider. let me answer another question that they asked, in fact,

you will not find such a statement from the minister of legal affairs of poland in any public resource, except in the media, right? and why? and because it was said at an evening meeting as part of one of the forums there, and as a discussion of various options. i simply do not want to make radyslav sekorsky an enemy of the ukrainian people, but... i can say that in such discussions, even such respectable people can be wrong. i know at least despite all his achievements and consistency, i know a case when i was part of this process there, and rosslav sikorsky made a mistake, in short, this is his 14th year, the maidan council, his coming to press for us to sign the agreement with the people, and the people agreed to sign an agreement with yanukovych, and he then convinced that this was the only way... to get out of the crisis, nothing like that, everything did not go as radislav sekorsky said, but as we said,

it went, so, uh, and such people are wrong, they do not really understand our internal subtleties, despite the fact that that i respect both him and his wife very much, that is, i have known them for many years, so don't make him an enemy, this is the first part, the second, since it has already become a discussion of the essence of the issue, and there is a referendum and everything else. then this is the answer given by the ministry of foreign affairs, well let's put it this way, russia is also there in its own way, well, this issue does not take off in any way with no referendums there, you and i know that in principle this is playing along with the russian position rather than the return of ukraine crimea, so there is no need, i think, to inflate it, why so it worked out, i'll tell you what it was, at first the rain went away. that the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyy, behaves harshly with the poles, it appears in the polish press, and then suddenly

it appears, and the representative of poland also seems to do the same at our meetings, that's all, i think that's how it came about , this emotionally informative duel will end as it is, nothing will continue, but if suddenly we hear such a position once again officially, from anyone, from radisław syukorski from... from the government of poland, if this if it is confirmed that they are calling for such a line, then yes, i would answer correctly, diplomatically, but even not everything is in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs, there you can make even clearer accents, this is an unacceptable position, it does not lead to anything good, because she is only now pouring water into the mill of the russians in this situation, well, yes, who are talking about the fact that the crimea... was and remains russian, this is also their position regarding this statement by sikorsky, they also

reflected and said that in general we have there is no need to hold any more there referendums, that's why we have such a reaction so far, another important decision that awaits ukraine is the decision on its permission for our western partners to strike with long-range weapons on the territory of the russian federation last week, the president. joseph biden of the united states of america met with the prime minister of great britain, keir starmer, and before that they visited ukraine. secretary of the united states of america and the minister of foreign affairs of great britain, they participated in the forum in several forums that took place in ukraine, there was an expectation that after the meeting of the president of the united states of america and the prime minister of great britain, the position of these two

countries would be somehow articulated, regarding the decision, or only regarding the decision. shvedov's storm that these missiles can fly over the territory of the russian federation, and even the guardian wrote about the fact that great britain has almost already made such a decision, is everything clear in this story, is it possible that this decision can be made, but it can be articulated publicly already after these missiles fly over russian territory federation. well, i would like to emphasize all the same. sorry we're talking about long-range missiles, they're actually short -range missiles, these missiles, maybe a little less distance, we had, we just used them already, these missiles, well, i mean point at, there, the same the rockets themselves, which were still

there in small quantities, were produced to a large extent. invasion, that is, these are not new, not new missiles for ukraine, we have the right to use them, moreover, i think that we really hope that we will see in the near future in the future, a wider application of ukrainian production of missiles, such a range, that is, a range of 300, 500 and up to 1000 km, this is a short range, i think that we have lost information, i read all... even our journalists of missiles, well, long-range is correct, this if a comparison, yes, with what we have today, but these are not long-range missiles, long-range missiles, i would consider them to be long-range missiles, yes, there are above 5,500 km, the average range of missiles is 15.5 in this interval, that is, what we

talk about with our partners, about the missiles that we have there are, we just don't have enough of them. we are talking with our partners, we have formulated this presentation incorrectly, we constantly emphasized when i say we, of course, i did not emphasize this, but i say, we, the ukrainians, the presidents, others emphasized, give us more missiles to hit, and no more rockets, give us accurate humane rocket weapons, rockets are humane weapons, because they, as it was in this... well, a parapet, in my opinion, yes, in this parapet, warehouses, they definitely hit, well, they said there are drones, well, i think, something seems to me that there is a missile was, so they definitely hit there, this is only my conclusion, i do not pretend that this is some kind of position, so that they do not say that i read it somewhere, no, i just saw the video, saw the explosion similar to rockets,

so that 500 are already used there as much as 30 km, i.e. we have our own, so nothing new, just the number is less, and the russians use iskanders, they hit odesa, they kill people, ours beat humanely, exactly in warehouses, they do not kill residents, and what are we going to do next, and what are we begging for, what we beg, y who, that is, we should not beg, but just rush and throw everything into the production of these types of missiles, and then no one would, well, it was done in... already, well, time has passed, and now, what is there, you know, already the difference is which missile will fly there to russia, one or the other, just the quantity is needed, and now, the quantity, this is an escalation, no, because the russians have received iranian ballistic missiles, the russians are receiving korean ballistic missiles, what are we talking about, that is, this i think this is the moment where we can speak privately

tough, because tough, why, because when there was a real moment that, well... some arguments worked there, i can’t understand, but now what arguments, no arguments, and what red lines, he kursk, the kursk region, crossed to the territory of russia, what other arguments can you have, there are no arguments, only in public it is not necessary to blow everything up there, to inflate it there, and not to just show the situation publicly, i think that it will be resolved in reality, well, because there are no real arguments, which... were with the americans before and with our partners, them now there are none, all those that were, have closed down, due to the unreasonable actions of russia, the increase in escalation on their part, now... why do i say that i emphasize once again, it is humane, it is a high-precision sniper missile weapon, ukraine should be armed with exactly these types of weapons , so that it is not

a contact battle with a kalashnikov or there even a javelin, namely a non-contact battle at a distance with uavs, with such missiles, with the same hymers, that is, this is what can somehow , well... a little balance be established with the russians, and in principles, well, i know, we have been talking about for a long time this, of course, i won't reveal the secret here, that it's not something i made up there, our negotiators there don't talk, they talk, but for some reason i still think that in this matter we could act creatively, well more creatively, in order to circumvent this inflexible political position, and now i think... it will be difficult to see it until the election day, and i think that already until the election day in the usa in november, well, i think that from the first days of november there, after

the fifth, we simply saw the use of this type of partner rockets, now the question is which one quantity, not only the quality, there is the range, but the quantity, and by the way, the german taurus, well, what further arguments will chancellor scholz have to keep these missiles? that is, it seems to me that this is all a political decision, it is overdue, and in fact we will find out sometime in november, already in the month of application. the european parliament appealed to ukraine's western partners and asked and urged them to immediately lift restrictions on ukraine's strikes with western weapons against the russian federation. the speaker of the state duma of the russian federation vyacheslav volodin criticized this appeal to the european parliament and. which threatened the west with nuclear weapons. let's listen to what volodya said. just think about what they are discussing.

they discuss the tasks of strikes on our peaceful cities. in addition, they discuss, believing that it will not affect them. this is not so. we will answer, and we have something to answer. more powerful weapons stand. ready, stand ready, mr. valeria, they've been announcing their powerful, more powerful weapons for so long, but judging by what cia director burns was saying about how he talked to naryshkin in the 22nd year, at the end of the 22nd year, and warned the russians about the consequences of using nuclear weapons against ukraine, because there was such a threat, as burns said. do they clearly understand in the kremlin what, what will be the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons, be it tactical or strategic,

any, and how will it end for the current regime in russia? they understand everything perfectly, don't listen to what volodin is saying there or from the rostrum of the state duma, this is an internal message for them, there is a king, there is a battle. but there are serfs, and serfs have to live in this understanding, there are so many lies being fed to the slaves that it is impossible to get to the head, russia will not use any strategic missiles, it is obvious, for two reasons: firstly, the potential of russia is incomparable, with the potential of the usa, together with britain there or, well, if comparable, everyone says, it will all be destroyed, there, in fact, russia knows that they have them... isn’t it the case that after a while the missile itself, and what about the charges, they don’t know at all, although you know me, these bots fly in when i comment that russia has not conducted

nuclear tests, but i also claim once, unlike the usa, which found a way to test without an actual explosion of a large-scale nuclear warhead, russia does not have such technology, and therefore there are no normal tests of nuclear weapons in russia, without a normal test no... what country should use nuclear weapons, except in such a moment when hundreds of warheads are flying at you there, only at this moment it is already desperate, in another situation it will not be used, this is the first, second, why would they use nuclear weapons if they blew up the tile, that is, it flooded man-made with enormous consequences, well, operationally, also an operation, then they have the zaporizhzhia station under control, which is constantly under... we don't know this, but the specialists there are constantly aware of situations that are looming, then decreasing, and when they would they are running on our transformers at nuclear

power plants for what later. endanger the normal operation of the as, in the crimea, if the west, the crimean titan, or whatever it is called there now, is also a dangerous object, we had a russian invasion in 1700, 17,000 such dangerous objects on our territory, yes, why should they, they first of all think about how to use it in reality, and not nuclear weapons, which they are pogroms. constantly there, that is, nuclear weapons are a balance for china, it is for another, but it is definitely not for this war, and the second thing is that they know that if only they do it, at least one tactical charge will be used there, that's all, they, they, they are over, they are over, putin knows it, that is, they do not have such comparable forces to withstand such a confrontation, they were warned, so i think that the threat is nuclear, it's... in the course

of the war, as we see it now, it's not that it doesn't exist, it exists, but the way it's inflated, out of fear, you know, actually the paradox is that the russians died now, i would say so, ten times more than the russians, only, only the military, only those who entered our land ten times more than would die from a few tactical... nuclear warheads, you understand that they they simply do not explain to their people, people do not know on what scale they are being killed, there, that's why we need to give more information, not to follow their line, to explain the situation to our partners, i would now pay more attention to objects such as the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which are captured by the russians, this is a real threat. well, by the way, president zelenskyi today welcomed the resolution of the magathe, which confirms

the need for restoration. ukraine's full control over the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant and the withdrawal of russian troops and personnel from this plant. he reminded that nuclear security is the first clause of the peace formula, i will quote the president zelensky. i am pleased to see that today's resolution of the magathe general conference contributes to this important effort. only through collective determination and principled action will we be able to force the aggressor to stop the blackmail. and terror, zelenskyy wrote on the social network x. mr. valery, does the resolution oblige the magathe to respond to russia, and can the magathe apply to russia and rosatom, in particular, any sanctions, because we know that russia is building a lot of nuclear power plants all over world, and no one has yet imposed any sanctions on

does not apply to dew. i am not mistaken, there are one or two cases of personal sanctions against rosatom, but you are right in that rosatom somehow feels very uncomfortable in this situation, and the reasons for not applying sanctions against rosatom are not impossible, let’s be fair, here are the decisions of many countries , and including european countries, and the usa, by the way, too, and this surprises me, because sanctions against rosat should have been in place for a long time, now... in relation to the magat, they are already adopting the second such resolution at the un, they also mentioned these issues , the magat is a structure of oonivsk, but the most interesting thing is that mr. grosti always says, it is not a question of the maga to talk about leaving the station, here we are at the level of the general conference, that is, it is all announced when 150 un members gather, well 178 are included in magat, well, 150 have gathered

now. the eighth, it seems, general conference in vienna. therefore, everything is fine, the magat can make such statements, and it is our task for ukraine to make as many such statements, resolutions, and fixing documents as possible for two goals first of all, this is a constant process of pressure on the zaporizhia nuclear power plant to be released, because it is in danger due to the occupation, now first of all, and also the people who work there, the russians were unable to do so. to start their own, to replace ukrainians, and there people keep it all by professionals, just so that it doesn't explode, that is, they keep it all for the third year already, so it's all very difficult, that's the question, and the second question is the responsibility later for these crimes, it is still necessary to consider the nuclear convention terrorism, that is, it still hasn't reached its hands, why it hasn't, i'll tell you.